Recenzijos
Als
A gumen ii
eine
solche
Be ach ungsweise
kann
das
li auische
Ve b
zi i y i
Cija,
-ijo)
,,sich
gegensei ig
beschimp en,
sich
zanken,
sich
s ei en;
zége n,
zau-
de n“
(Duse os,
Daugéliskis,
UZpaliai
—
LZ...
1037)
ange iih
we den,
das
als
Denomina i
on
zi i as
,,jemand,
de
sich
s ei e ,
sich
zank *
be ach e
we den
kann.
In
de
einschlagigen
Fo schung
bes eh
schon
langs
die
Einsich ,
dass
ein
Teilgebie
No dos li auens
(Za asai,
Duse os
usw.)
und
das
siidwes liche
A eal?
de
Bal en
und
de
P euSen
du ch
einen
Biindel
Isoglossen
e bunden
sind.
Die
im
Rahmen
de
on
deu schen
He ausgebe n
inanzie en
und
e é en -
lich en
Reihe
Hyd onymia
Eu opaea
e schienene
S udie
,,Bal ische
O snamen
in
Os p euen*
on
G asilda
Blaziené
is
als
eine
o iginelle
und
g iindlich
du chdach e
wissenscha liche
Fo schungsa bei
zu
be ach en.
Simas
Ka aliiinas
Lie u iy
kalbos
ins i u as
P.
Vileixio
g.
5,
LT-10308
Vilnius,
Lie u a
Giacomo
De o o
Bal is ikos
as ai
«
Sc i i
bal is ici
Edi ed
by
Pie o
U.
Dis
and
Boni acas
S unpxa
Vilnius:
Ty o
alba,
2004,
pp.
263[1],
ISBN
9986-16-383-8
Acco ding
o
he
p e ace
(p.
9)
he e
o
he
i s
ime
a e
published
all
o
Giacomo
De o o’s
Bal is ic
w i ings
which
ha e
o
he
mos
pa
his o ical
signi icance,
no
only
in
he sense o
linguis ic
his o iog aphy
bu
also
in
he
b oade
sense o
he
cul u al
bonds
be ween
I aly
and
he
Bal ic
(pa icula ly
Li huania).
Today
newe
disco e ies
and
mo e
mode n
scien i ic
me hods
ha e
gone
beyond
he
heo e ical
and
ac ual
s a emen s
encoun e ed
in
De o o’s
w i ings.
Ne e heless
he
wo ks
published
he e
show
he
ma u i y
o
I alian
Bal ic
s udies
a ained
du ing
he
in-
e wa
pe iod
and
seem
o
emphasize
he
di ec ion
o
hei
u he
de elopmen .
De o o’s
a icles
a e
di ided
in o
wo
g oups,
(i)
Linguis ics
and
(ii)
Li e a u e
and
o he
subjec s.
They
a e
published
in
Li huanian
ansla ion
in
he
i s
pa
o
he
*Vgl.
S.
Ka aui0nas,
Bal y
p aei is
is o iniuose
Sal iniuose
II.
Vilnius:
Lie u iy
kalbos
ins i u as,
2005,
239-240,
310-311.
135
Recenzijos
book
(pp.
37-128)
and
in
he
I alian
o iginal
in
he
second
pa
o
he
book
(pp.
165-263).
The e
a e
wo
in oduc o y
a icles
abou
De o o,
one
by
Pie o
U.
Dini,
“Giacomo
De o o
bal is as:
Nuomonés
i
ci a os”
(pp.
13-29)
=
“Opinioni
e
ci azio-
ni
su
Giacomo
De o o
bal is a”
(pp.
141-158)
and
he
second
by
Boni acas
S undiia,
“Zymiojo
i aly
neoling is o
bal iSkoji
ajek o ija”
(pp.
30-34)
=
“La
aie o ia
bal ica
di
un
amoso
neolinguis a
i aliano”
(pp.
159-164).
Dini
no es
ha
Bal ic
s udies
was
no
De o o’s
p ima y
in e es ,
bu
a he an-
cien
languages.
De o o
himsel
w o e
in
he
i s
issue
o
S udi
Bal ici
(1931:
3)
ha
his
only
connec ion
wi h
he
Bal ic
languages
was
a
esul
o
s udy
wi h
W.
Schulze
and
M.
Niede mann,
Pe haps
De o o’s
s udy
o
he
Bal ic
languages
would
ha e
ceased
had
he
no
been
appoin ed
he
edi o
o
S udi
Bal ici.
I
seems
ha
all
o
his
Bal is ic
s udies
began
a
ha
ime
(p.
14).
Among
hese
a e
a icles
which
oday
we
would
conside
pu ely
in o ma ional
(p.
15,
143),
al hough
hey
p obably
did
no
seem
such
in
I aly
o
he
1930s.
Dini
w i es
ha
De o o
knew
he
Bal ic
lands
pe sonally
(p.
18,
146).
In
he
all
o
1933
un il
Decembe
he
s udied
Li huanian
and
augh
a
he
Uni e si y
o
Kaunas.
Du ing
his
pe iod
he
ook
se e al
side
ips
o
isi
P o .
Mikkola
in
Helsinki,
P o .
Endzelins
in
Riga
and
P o .
Kiecke s
in
Ta u.
Al hough
De o o
was
asked
o
con ibu e
o
Endzelins’
Fes sch i
he
was
unable
o,
bu
he wished
o
be
included
in
he
Tabula
g a ula o ia
(p.
19,
148).
Dini
w i es
(p.
25,
153)
ha
De o o
was
one
o
he
mos
eminen
Indo-
Eu opeanis s
o
his
ime
and
ha
his
in e es
in
Bal ic
languages
was
connec ed
wi h
Indo-Eu opean
s udies.
De o o
was
mos
likely
mo e
in e es ed
in
he
classical
lan-
guages,
I alic
languages
and
he
I alian
language.
Pe haps
his
is
why
some
schola s
who
s udied
wi h
De o o
in
Flo ence
a e
inclined
o
a e
his
Bal ic
wo k
as
being
o
hi d- a e
impo ance.
The
a icle
by
Boni acas
S undzia
emphasizes
De o o’s
posi i e
eelings
abou
he
Li huanian
na ion.
S undzia
(p.
34,
164)
quo es
om
De o o’s
a icle
abou
he
Li huanian
language:
“Ma
chi
pensi
che
@
occo so
11
p es igio
di
Dan e
e
dei
g andi
a is i
oscani
pe
da e
all’I alia
la
sua
lingua
le e e ia;
che
ci
son
olu i
secoli di
lo e
da
pa e
dei
e
di
F ancia
pe
consac a e
il
p es igio
poli ico
della
ci a
di
Pa igi
non
meno
di
quello
linguis ico
del
suo
diale o,
ima a
ammi a o
e
so p eso
dall’a dimen o
con
cui
i
pa io i
li uani
hanno
olu o
senza
un
genio
le e a io,
con
una
au onomia
poli ica
ai
p imi
passi,
c ea e
a i icialmen e
ques e
condizioni,
en-
a e
pe
la
p ima
ol a
la
col i azione
in
se a
di
una
pian a
che
non
e a
c esciu a
se
non
a a e so
i
secoli,
len a
e
libe a
da
ogni
olon a
umana.”
-
“Bu
whoe e
136
Recenzijos
keeps
in
mind
he
ac
ha
he
p es ige
o
Dan e
and
ha
o
he
g ea
Tuscan
a -
is s
we e
necessa y
o
gi e
I aly
i s
li e a y
language
and
ha
cen u ies
o
s uggles
on
he
pa
o
he
F ench
kings
we e
necessa y
o
gi e
he
ci y
o
Pa is
i s
poli ical
p es ige
and
he
p es ige
o
i s
dialec ,
will
admi e
and
be
su p ised
a
he
boldness
wi h
which
he
Li huanian
pa io s,
wi hou
a
li e a y
genius
and
wi h
a
poli ical
au onomy
in
i s
ea ly
s ages,
ha e
wished
o
c ea e
hese
condi ions
a i icially,
o
a emp
o
he
i s
ime
he
cul i a ion
in
a
g eenhouse
o
a
plan
( ee?)
which
has
only
g own
h ough
he
cen u ies,
slowly
and
ee
om
any
human
in e en ion.”
S undiia
adds
hen
ha
p obably
no
o eigne
has
e e
said
any hing
nice .
The
i s
a icle
in
he
linguis ics
sec ion
“Lie u iy
kalba”
(pp.
37-49)
=
“La
lin-
gua
li uana”
(pp.
167-179)
con aining
he
quo a ion
gi en
abo e
(p.
40,
170)
is
a
b ie
gene al
desc ip ion
o
he
Li huanian
language
in ended
o
he
non-specialis .
He e De o o
no es he
appea ance
o
Al ed
Senn’s
g amma
Li auische
Sp achleh e
(Heidelbe g,
1929),
a ha
ime
he
only
g amma
a ailable
o
o eigne s
since
he
publica ion
o
Leskien’s
Lesebuch.
Mino
inaccu acies
such
as
he
co ec ion
o
he
name
o
Senn’s
g amma
o
Kleine
Li auische
Sp achleh e
a e
gi en
in
he
oo no es
o
he
Li huanian
ansla ion
o
De o o’s
a icle
(p.
48),
bu
no
in
he
o iginal
(p.
178).
O
conside able
in e es
is
he
“P is a ymas”
(p.
40)
=
“P esen azione”
(p.
180)
om
he
i s
olume
o
S udi
Bal ici.
He e
De o o
calls
o
ou
a en ion
ha
his
jou nal
is
he
i s
in e na ional
jou nal
de o ed
o
Bal ic
philology
ou side
o
he
Bal ic
coun ies.
De o o
also
announceshis
in en ion
o
publish
a icles
in
languages
o he
han
I alian.
Dini
(p.
20,
148)
w i es
ha
in
he
i s
eigh
olumes
o
S udi
Bal ici
he e
we e
102
a icles
by
au ho s
o a ious
na ionali ies,
app oxima ely
20%
by
I alians
and
80%
by
o eigne s
(p.
24,
153).
A
p esen
ou side
o
he
Bal ic
coun ies
he e
is
only
one
o he
jou nal
de o ed
exclusi ely
o Bal ic linguis ics
and
cul u e,
iz.,
he
I alian
jou nal
Res
Bal icae,
a
wo hy
successo o
S udi
Bal ici.
The
I alian
jou nal
Pon o-Bal ica
could
in
p inciple
also
be
called
a
wo hy
successo ,
bu
i
does
no
emphasize
exclusi ely
Bal ic
subjec s.
In
he
a icle
“Tau a
i
Jaudis”
(pp.
51-57)
=
“Tau a
e
laudis”
(pp.181-187)
De o o
w i es
ha
he
wo d
au a
deno es
he
o iginal
o ganiza ion
o
‘s a e’
o
‘go -
e nmen ’
and
de i es
om
a
oo
* eu a
/*
ou a,
whe eas
Jaudis e e s
o
a
people
wi h
common
inhe i ance
and
de i es
om
he
oo
*leudh-
‘ o
g ow’.
The
a icle
“Lie u iy
dos is”,
la .
uds is”
(pp.
58-64)
=
“Li .
ios is,
Le .
uds-
is
‘suoce o””
(pp.188-194)
no es
ha
o iginally
he
Bal ic
wo d
mean
only
he
‘wi e’s
a he ’
no ,
as
la e
became
possible,
also
he
‘husband's
a he ’.
Fo
his
wo d
De o o
econs uc s
a
oo
OUKJ-
(p.
193)
(which
in
con empo a y
ansc ip ion
137
Recenzijos
would
be
*ouk-
wi h
a
long
diph hong
and
a
pala o- ela
k).
De o o,
p esen ing
se -
e al
di e en
possibili ies
o
de elopmen
inds
he
same
oo
in
a
di e en
ablau
g ade
in
La .
dixo
‘wi e’.
Al hough
F aenkel
(1955:
1168)
w i es
ha
he
e ymology
o
ios is
is
‘zwei elha ’
he
quo es
De o o’s
a icle
and
some
o he
schola s
who
ap-
p o e
he
connec ion
wi h
La .
uxo .
Al hough
he
acu e
s ess
implies
a
phone ically
long
owel
one
wonde s
whe he
in
he
Passage
o
*duk-
o
*6k-
he e
was
an
ea ly
monoph hongiza ion
(Schmals ieg
1980:
32-33).
The
a icle
“La iy
kilmé
i
kalba”
(pp.
65-81)
=
“Le
o igini
e
la
lingua
dei
le oni”
(pp.
195-214)
is
a
b ie
popula
accoun
o
he
o igin
o
he
La ians
and
hei
language
and
“K ie imas
i
bal y
ilologija”
(pp.
82-93)
=
“In i o
alla
ilologia
bal ica”
(pp.
215-227)
se s
o h
some
o
he
basic
P inciples
o
he
discipline,
many
(bu
no
all)
o
which
ha e
emained
alid
un il
oday.
The
a icle
“Bal ai
i
sla ai”
(pp.
94-105)
=
“Bal i
i
sla i”
(pp.
228-240)
be-
gins
wi h
a
b ie
a cheological
e alua ion
o
he
ela ionships
and
hen
passes
o
a
linguis ic
e alua ion
which
no es
co ec ly
ha
he
Bal ic
languages
a e
in
gene al
mo e
conse a i e
han
he
Sla ic.
The
b ie
discussion
o
he
ocalic
sys em
(p.
97;
pp.
231-232)
is
eally
unsa is ac o y
om
he
con empo a y
s uc u alis
poin
o
iew.
Acco ding
o
De o o:
“L’a ea
bal ica
non
é
s a a
insensibile
a
con a i
con
ambien e
ge manico:
l’a icinamen o
delle
ocali
0
aa iene
con
le
s esse
modal-
i a
p esso
i
Ge mani
e
Li uani,
e
con
al e
modali a
p esso
Le oni
e
Sla i:
indicando
la
a
p esso
i
p imi
le
due
ocali
b e i
o
4,
p esso
i
secondi
le
lunghe
6
d;
men e
P esso
i
secondi
é
la
o
che
app esen a
le
b e i
e
la
a
le
lunghe.
Inol e,
pe
quello
che
igua da
la
-6
in
posizione
inale,
li uano
e
go ico
anno
d’acco do
nel
a a la
in
modo
speciale
nel
g uppo
-dm.”
In
ega d
o
he
de elopmen
o
Indo-Eu opean
*6
and
*d
one
can
say
ha
hese
phonemes
me ged
in
Ge manic,
Bal ic
and
Sla ic,
bu
he
phone ic
esul
was
he
same
in
Bal ic
and
Ge manic
as
opposed
o
he
phone ic
esul
in
Sla ic.
Accompanying
he
Li huanian
ansla ion
(bu
no
he
I alian
o iginal)
is
a
oo no e
(p.
97)
by
he
scien i ic
edi o
(appa en ly
Boni acas
S undiia,
acco ding
o
he
on
ma e
on
p.
4)
who
co ec s
De o o’s
s a emen
somewha
no ing
ha
*6
and
*d
me ge
as
*d
in
bo h
Li huanian
and
La ian
and
ha
La ian
d
co esponds
o
long
*d
and
only
some imes
o
*6.
We
mus
assume
ha
De o o
knew
Endzelin’s
con a y
opinion,
since
i
was
exp essed
in
he
jou nal
o
which
he
was
he
edi o ,
S udi
Bal ici
(1934-1935:
136):
“Nach
meine
es en
Ube zeugung
dagegen
kann
ein
ide.
6
ein
lau lich
nu
ein
li.-le.
uo
e geben...”
S ang
(1966:
47)
w o e:
“In
Li .-Le .
is
die
Sache
Kla : ieu .
6
is
du ch
uo
e e en.”
Cu iously
enough
his
seems
o
138
Recenzijos
be
con a y
o his
opinion
exp essed
ea lie
(1942:
196,
n.
1):
“Ich
echne
-
im
Gegensa z
zu
Endzelin
—
mi
eine
zwei achen
En wicklung
des
ieu .
6
im
Li .-Le .,
namlich
zu uo
und
4G,
gl.
Gen.
Sg.
ilko
=
la .
lup6
sowie
le .
dasns
(li .
dosniis)...”.
Maiiulis
(1970:
21)
has
sugges ed
ha s essed
Indo-Eu opean
*6
gi es
Li h.-La .
uo,
whe eas
uns essed
Indo-Eu opean
*6
gi es
Li h.
6
and
La .
a
The
s a emen
ha
Li huanian
and
Go hic
ha e
he
same
ea men
o
inal
-om
is
mo e
o
less
ue
(i.e.,
when
he
Li h. inal
-om
p esupposes
he
ea lie
loss
o a ollowing
owel,
as
in
he
da .
dual
ending
-oma,
c .
Zinke icius
1980:
198).
De o o’s
s a emen
is
no ,
howe e ,
pa icula ly
ele an .
Indo-Eu opean
*a
and
*6
me ged
as
*6
al eady
in
Common
Ge manic
(Guxman
e
al.
1962,
116-117),
whe eas
he
passage
o
d
o
6
in
Li huanian
is
ela i ely
ecen ,
examples
o
he
e en ion
o
he
e ymological
4
s ill
being
occasionally
encoun e ed
in
Maz ydas.
He e
we
ind,
e.g.,
*-@
s em
nom.
pl.
mald-as
‘p aye s’
(U bas
1996:
218)
p esumably
wi h
an
-d-
in
he
inal
syllable
(c .
con empo a y
mald-os),
while
Go hic
has
he
e ymological
*-d
s em
nom.
pl.
gib-os
‘gi s’.
Go hic has
a
da .
pl.
(wi h
e ymological
-6m)
gib-om,
bu
Maz ydas
has
an
ins .
pl.
dawan-am-is
‘wi h
gi s’
(U bas
1996:
100)
showing
an
-a-
in
bo h
he
i s
and
hi d
syllable
as
opposed
o
con empo a y
do anomis.
Thus
he
ea ly
Li huanian
passage
o
/a/
o
/6/ has
no hing
o
do
wi h
he
Common
Ge manic
me ge
o
*/a/
and
*/6/
o
any
imagined
Go hic
in luence.
The
a icle
“Tau os
aplinkui
Bal ija”
(pp.
109-119)
=
“Gen i
nel
Bal ico”
(pp.
243-255)
is
a
b ie
sympa he ic
his o ical
s udy
o he
na ions
bo de ing
on
he
Bal ic
Sea.
The
p e ace
o
S o ia
delle
le e a u e
bal iche
(Milan
1957)
is
ep oduced
on
pp.
255-258
(wi h
Li huanian
ansla ion
on
pp.
120-123).
This
book
con ains
a i-
cles
on
Li huanian
li e a u e
by
P o .
Al ed
Senn
(my
own
eache ),
on
La ian
li e a u e
by
E ns s
(no
E nes s
as
gi en
on
pp.
258,
263, 123,
128)
Blese
and
on
Es onian
li e a u e
by
An s
O as.
De o o
concludes
his
p e ace
by
saying
ha
his
book
b ings
a
wo d
o
solida i y,
unde s anding
and
hope
o
all
men
o
le e s
and
hei
compa io s
be hey
in
hei
homeland
o
in
exile
(p.
258,
128).
The
p e ace
o
he
second
upda ed
edi ion
o
his
book
en i led
La
le e a u e
di
Paesi
Bal ici.
Finlandia,
Es onia,
Le onia,
Li uania
(Flo ence,
Milan 1969)
is
ep oduced
on
pp.
259-263
(wi h
Li huanian
ansla ion
on
pp.
124-127).
The
au ho s
o he
a icles
a e
he
same
as abo e,
bu
P o .
Edoa do
Robe o
Gumme us
was
added
o
w i e he
a icle
on
Finnish
li e a u e.
The
conclusion
o
his
p e ace
is
simila
o
he
p e ious
p e ace,
bu
he e
he
speci ic
wo ds
“nelle
e
epubbliche
so ie iche,
in
Finlandia
e
all’es e o”
ha e
eplaced
“in
pa ia
e
in
esilio”
o
he
i s
edi ion.
139

Recenziyos
Also
ep oduced
he e
a e
a
pho og aph
o
Giacomo
De o o
(p.
2),
pho og aphs
o
he
co e s
o
a ious
issues
o
S udi
Bal ici
(pp.
129-132)
he
co e
o
De o o’s
Sc i i
Mino i
(p.
133)
and
a
pos -ca d
sen
by
De o o
o
Vaclo as
Bi ziéka
(p.
134).
This
book
is
a
aluable
aid
o
esea ch
on
he
his o y
o
Bal ic
s udies
and
is
a
i ing
ibu e
o
he
g ea
schola
Giacomo
De o o,
who
had
he
ene gy
and
he
in e es
o
edi
S udi
Bal ici,
in
i s
ime
he
only
jou nal
de o ed
o
Bal ic
linguis ics
published
in
a
non-Bal ic
coun y.
This
book’s
edi o s,
Pie o
U.
Dini,
Boni acas
S undzia
and
he
ansla o s
Dainius
Bi é,
Rasa
Kliog o ai y é,
Anna
Ka pié
and
Paola
Fe oli
a e
o
be
hanked
o
making
Giacomo
De o o’s
Bal ic
wo k
easily
a ailable
in
book
o m.
REFERENCES
Enpze in,
J.
1934-1935:
Was
is
im
al p eussischen
aus
ide.
6
(und
a)
gewo den?
S udi
Bal ici
4,
135-143.
F a nxe ,
E,
1955:
Li auisches
e ymologisches
Wo e buch.
Heidelbe g:
Ca l
Win e
~
Go ingen:
Vandenhoeck
&
Rup ech .
Guxman,
M.
M.,
V.
M.
Zi munsku,
E.
A,
Maka
&
V.
N.
JaRce a,
1962:
S ayni el’naja
g am-
ma ika
ge manskix
jazyko
II.
Fonologija.
Moscow:
Izda el’s o
Akademii
nauk
SSSR.
Maz uiis,
V.
1970:
Bal y
i
kuy
indoeu opieciy
kalby
san ykiai.
Vilnius:
Min is,
Mai us,
V.
2004:
P iisy
kalbos
is o iné
g ama ika.
Vilnius:
Vilniaus
uni e si e o
leidykla,
Scuma s ies,
W.
R.
1980:
Indo-Eu opean
linguis ics:
A
new
syn hesis.
Uni e si y
Pa k
&
London:
The
Pennsyl ania
S a e
Uni e si y
P ess.
U sas,
D.
1996:
Ma yno
Maz ydo
as y
Zodynas.
Vilnius:
Mokslo
i
enciklopedijy
leidykla,
Zinxe icius,
Z.
1980:
Lie u iy
kalbos
is o iné
§ ama ika
I.
Vilnius:
Mokslas
William
R.
Schmals ieg
814
Co nwall
Road
S a e
College,
Pa.
16803,
USA
140