LITHUANI-
AN
KALBOT-
YROS
KLAUSIMAI XXXVII (1997)
LEXICOGRAFIES
IR
LEXICOLOGY
PROBLEMS
Gied é
CEPAITIENE
DIRECTIV-
ES IN THE
LETTERS
OF JONAS JABLONSKIS
Cu en ly
he
p o esso 's
A noldo
Pi oékino
upesciu
a e
published
424
Jono
Jablonski-
's Le e s
(Jablonskis
1985;
Jablonskis
1991).
Majo i y
&iy laisky
agylie u-
i8kai
i
some
(353),
usiSkai
one
polki8kai.
(70),
o
The con en
o J.
Jablonski's
le e s is
usually
objec i e,
so he e is
li le
pe sonal
mo
a
emo ion in hem.
In his
sense,
somewh-
a mo e
di e e-
n
le e s o son
Cons an ine,
pa
Kazimie ui
The e's
ano he
le e
i
o
Jokan y.
In his le e s, J.
Jablonskis usually
uses e e ences only
a he beginning o
he le e o does no
use hem a all.
Le e s o
be
appeal
acco ding o
he
objec i es
o he
applica ion
1)
a e wo old:
i
o discuss
he issues
o he
ipimos
language,
a
book
publishing
public
o ganiza ions
(plg.
Jablonskis
1985:
47,
94,
324-352
i
e al.);
2)
add essed
o he
heads o
a ious ins i u ions.
The la e
le e s
usually
begin wi h
he name
o he
add essee,
e.g., P o .
M.
Bi ziskai,
humani a inio
akul e o
dekanu :
Minis y o
Educa ion
K.
Jokan ui;
Humani a ian
Facul y
To he
dean p o .
V.K é -Micke ič.
Simila beha io is
ound in some
le e s add essed
i
o
Juozui
Tumui.
They also
o en
begin wi h
he name
o he
add esse-
e's class
(Kun.
J.
Thus, he
o
ph ase is
ei he used as
a p eposi ion
o as a su ix.
be
O cou se,
he o he
non-ad e -
bial o ms
a e
di e en ,
no
sui able
o he
a o emen-
j
ioned
g oups.
Now he
add ess is
usually used
by he
pe son
(i.e.
noun) Alias,
some imes
iSplés as
pazyminiais
—
(LKG
III:
689-683;
DLKG:
637-638).
J.
In
Jablonski's
le e s,
he
endency
o he use
o oslo eniy is somewha di e en .
He e much
mo e o en
used o
desc ibe he
add ess
j ai iis
j a dZiuo iniai
bid a dziai
pazymimuyjy
be
Zodziu.
Mos o en
add essed
binomial
honou able
(hono able,
hono ed).
Yes
J.
Jablonski
beha ed
almos all he
yea s o his
li e
(1904-1926),
Almos all
co esponden s
we e add essed
j
in his way.
Remembe
ha once in
né
he
emaining
le e s
This is no
applied only
a ew
j
Zmoniy
—
aSy oja
Jona
Biliiina,
j
Pe a
Leona,
Po ila
Vi8inskj
i
j
blue
Cons an ine.
This
add ess is
no used in
i
he
iSlikusiuose
laiškuose
Vincui
You' e a ool.
]
he pe sons
e e ed o
J.
Jablonski-
's
add essed
wi h
o
Wa me
Wo ds, i
is
pe missible o assume ha
Siuos
People
we e
connec -
ne
ed by a
mo e
han business ela ionships.
A he
beginning o
he mee ing,
he o m was
used a couple
o imes,
" espec ul masses".
Bo h
o ms
J.
Jablonski is
ap aS¢s in
g amma .
1901
m.
g amma ,
aiSkinan
j a dZiuo in-
iy bid a dziy
sanda g
(He e hey a e
called
duplici ous), i is
s a ed ha
hey
“ he e is
he
i§
o ma ion
o he
i
solid
biwo d
i8 a dzio
jis o he
a i ma i-
256
e
pa ícula
a/’ in he
e b o
he
nomina i -
e, bu
such an
example is
no gi en
in he
exis ing
e b
pa adigms
(Jablonsk-
is 1957:
84-85). I is
also
men ioned
in he
g amma
o 1922
(Jablonsk-
is 1957:
211). As
he
le e s
show,
a e 1905,
Jablonski
himsel did
no use
his o m.
Some im-
es he
le e s
begin wi h
a dea . In
he ea ly
co espo-
ndence o
J.
Jablonski
his
e e ence
is
ex emely
a e — i is
used only
once in a
le e
add essed
o P.
Vi8inski
(end o
No embe
1904). He
se ed in
he
1924–1927
gene al
elec ion. I
has been
used in
le e s o
Juozas
Bal ikonis
(1924 06 11),
Kazimie -
as
Jokan a
(1925 05 07)
and
Me kelis
Raékausk-
as (1927 06
16), and a
couple o
imes o
Zigmq
Kuzmickj
(1927 08 06;
1927 12 16).
Once,
w i ing o
Gab ielė
Pe ke iéa-
i ė-Bi ė on
he days
o he
e i eme-
n , J.
Jablonskis
add esses
he wi h
wo
nickname-
s: Dea ,
es eemed
(1924 10 18).
I is mo e
commonly
used o
e e o
he
belo ed
(belo ed).
This
add ess
was
epea ed-
ly used by
J.
Jablonskis
in
con e sa-
ions wi h
his son
Kons an i-
nas, in
le e s o
Juozas
Tumas-Va-
ižgan as,
he
Li huanian
Scien i ic
Socie y
and
S asys
Dabusys.
By he
way, he
las
le e
nei8likes,
Known
only his
nuo aSas.
In i is
eco ded
he simple
(no
named)
o m o
he
biwo d
mylimas,
which,
acco ding
o A.
Pi o kin,
is
a ibu a-
ble o a
no e y
aS ing
pe aSiné-
ojui
(Jablonsk-
is 1985:
101). A
couple o
imes
used
iSplés i
ad e bs.
They
sp ead
he name
o mine.
The only
known
le e o
J. Biliūnas
is called
Mano
mylimasis
(1905 01 26),
and he
add ess
my dea is
used in
le e s o
P o ess-
o
Edua das
Vol e is
(1926 03 06)
and Z.
Kuzmickis
(1926 03 06).
I is
commonly
said ha
possessi-
e nouns
indica e
ela ions-
hips o
dependen-
ce, he
noun 0
indica es
ha he
objec
belongs o
he
speake
(LKG I: 673;
DLKG: 261).
I seems
ha such
a
de ini ion
in his
case is
no qui e
app op ia-
e. |
junginj
my dea
synch oni-
SkaWe
could see
as j
saying ¢u
es/man
dea
nominaliz-
acijq. In
Indo-Eu o-
pean
languages,
such a
change o
noble/u ili-
y is
common
(Fillmo
1981: 460).
Acco ding
o A.
Rosinas,
cons uc-
ions wi h
possessi-
e
adjec i -
es and
nouns can
be
ega ded
as
pe iph as-
es o each
o he
(Rosinas
1988: 22).
Simila
s a emen-
s J.
Jablonskis
uses o
desc ibe
he use
o a hing
ha has
happened
o
someone
and ha
is o
someone,
and he
explains
ha hey
a e used
“no only
o
desc ibe
he
ad en u -
es o he
hing, bu
also o
indica e
he mos
a ied
aspec s
o i ”
(Jablonsk-
is 1957:
600).
Appa en l-
y, he
a o emen-
ioned
add esses
can also
be
ea ed
as
demons -
a i e
biasing. O
cou se,
his is
de e min-
ed no by
he noun,
bu by he
ad e b.
The e is a
mixed
daik a a -
diniy
k eipiniy.
They a e
ex ended
by
adjec i e-
s, e.g. :
Dea
F iend ( o
V. Kudi ka,
1883 04 14),
Dea
F iend ( o
P.
Visinskiui,
1903 04 11),
Dea
F iends
( o he
eache ,
1928 11 03),
Dea
Coun y-
man ( o an
unknown
add esse-
e, 1898 11
14), Dea
Coun y-
woman ( o
M.
Zaunei e,
1904 12 09).
I should
be no ed
ha J.
Jablonskis
uses bo h
he simple
o m jq
and he
j a dZiuo-
ing
biid a dz-
io o m in
hese
combina i-
ons. In he
1922
g amma
examples,
we also
ind
sen ences
wi h bo h
he
o dina y
and he
noun o m
o he
ad e b: Ko
e ki,
sesele
jaunoji?
Ko I idi
sesile,
whi e- ail-
ed sesile
(Jablons-
257
small
1957:
408).
O cou se,
he gi en
examples a e
no en i ely
adequa e: in
he i s
sen ence we
me
ha e a noun
add ess,
iSplés a, in
he
noun-p eposi-
ioned o m,
in he second
add ess
i’plés as wi h
a p eposi ion,
—
in he
o dina y
o m.
i
Kalbedama
abou
This kind
o
appeals,
An ané
Kuéinskai é
indica es only
j a dZiuo ines
biid a dziy
o ms as
sui able o
use
(Ku¢inskai é
1985:
62).
Only one
ime o
us
j
Unknown
add ess-
ee
J.
Jablonski
add esses
Spoken
language
in he
usual
o m
S e kas
is ali e
(1926
08
11).
A.
Kuéinskai é
conside s
such
le e s
amilia
(Ku¢inskai é
1985:
72).
So such
J.
Jablonski-
's appeal
seems o
sugges
ha he
ime o
as ing
should be
qui e
close
J.
This is he only
e e ence o
Jablonski in his
ela i ely ex ensi e
co espondence.
Appea ance only
nounziy
—
Sauksmininku
J.
Jablonski-
's
con empo-
a ies we e no gi ing.
No mally
I is used
he e
Zodis
b o/au.
Once, using he
add ess o a
iend's name,
§j
Jablonskis
k eipési
su
J.
j
V.
Kudi ka:
Vincu i
B olau
(1883
07
15).
The
add essee is
he e o e
pa icula ly sensi i e.
Wa mly,
like he
dea es
pe son,
al hough
he ex
o he
le e
does no
con ain
a ious
easons.
Appa en-
ly, wi h
a wa m
add ess
Wi h
wo ds he
ied o
show his
closeness
o his
o me
high school
iend.
Un o u-
na ely,
he le e s
V.
Kudi kas
we do no
know.
Né
j
iena ki a
asmenj
lie u iSkuose
J.
Jablonski's
le e s do no
add ess him
by name, only
in one
pos ca d
J.
Baléikoniui,
men ioning
he name
o he
add essee, bu
He e is he
g ee ing in
La in:
Josepho
e
conso ibus
Joanne wi h
conso es
salu em
dici
(1915
09
24).
Re e ing
o b o/au
especially
equen ly
in imes
Juozui
Baléikoniui
(16
ka e),
Kazimie ui
Jokan ui
(12x), o
Me kel
Raékauskui
(7x), o
Kazimie ui
Biigai
(4x),
Pe e
Leonui
(3x).
Po
ieng ano he
ime so
add essed o he
co esponden s:
j
Young
Basana iciy,
An anq
Sme ona,
Ju gj
Slapelj,
Po ilg
Vi8inskj.
Pagal
The equency
o use o his
appella i e can
only pa ially
ell us abou
he
co esponden-
's
in e ela ions-
hips, because
i8like is no all
i§
ne
J.
Jablonski-
's Le e s.
Be
he e o e, such a
compa ison
equi es an
analysis o he
mu ual
co espondence.
I should be
no ed ha
mos o he
le e s
add essed
su
o b o/au
a e w i en
in
1909-1913
ig
B es o,
G adina
i
G ea .
A
only does
no show
These
a e he
signs o a
ce ain
language
anxie y,
li ing and
wo king
i
a om
Li huani-
a, ku j
laika ne
be
Seimas,
kai
‘i’ aZia o
ik a
o
The meaning
o he wo d
o ea n, as
|
Ame ica”
(Pi oquine
1978:
56)?
Special
uses
J.
The
Le e s o Jablonski
K.
Some hing.
Al hough
he was
J.
Jablonski's
pupil a he
Min auja
Gymnasium
(Jablonskis
1985:
416),
a-
Ciau
These
people
we e only
ne
connec -
ed by a
—
eache --
s uden
ela ions-
hip, bu a
much
ni
close one.
Like
blowjob,
laiskase
i§
B es o
j
K.
Jokan a
o en
called
b o/au,
one ime
in a
—
g acious
o m
b o/ ukai
(1909
10
29).
I8excep ional
i
Con en
o his
message:
J.
Jablonski
cons an -
ly
conside s possible
K.
Joachim's
ma iage
su
o a
i
o eigne
ies o
ad ise him.
In a ow
(1909
m.
no embe
—
decembe mén. ),
Jablonskis, as i
in pu sui o
simplici y, begins
o polemise wi h
J.
imagina y
in e locu o s,
con eying
su
possible
eac ions, a he
same ime using
add esses:
jy
258
I I we e a
young man
and, ha ing
se led in a
coun y ha
is ha d o li e
in and
he e o e
e y
uns able, I
would all in
lo e wi h
such a i gin
o ha
coun y, who
is ex emely
conce ned
abou he
a ai s o
he coun y,
hen, belie e
me, I would
only help he
o deal wi h
he a ai s
o he
coun y and
do e e y hing
o make my
child en good
wo ke s o
ha coun y
(I am no
alking abou
Snekes
anymo e). I I
we e o say,
as I do, o my
own
compa io s,
“Do you
su ende ?” I
would only
squeeze hem
and boldly
say, “I do no
wan o aise
a
he maph odi-
e [...].” When
my own
daugh e
g ows up and
goes
somewhe e in
La ia, in he
coun y o
La ia, I will
say o he :
“You
child en can
only be good
La ians,
ha ’s all you
ha e o do
[...]” [...] In
you las wo
yea s, I hink,
you ha e been
oo close o
alking abou
“pa io ism”.
I I hough
so, I could
boldly
p oclaim:
“Take, man,
he gi ls who
sui you wi h
hei cul u e
and
educa ion,
he people
he e a e
no hing, li e
no in Pil iSki,
no Kupisky,
bu whe e e
you ind
g ow h,
be e you
i cul u e...”
I is
no ewo hy
ha , as i
quo ing om
he
Snekamaja
kalbq, J.
Jablonskis
chooses noun
add esses,
which a e no
common in his
w i ings. I
should be
no ed ha j
duk q is
add essed
askeli,
al hough in
he na i e
dialec o J.
Jablonski he
wo d a/kas,
when
deno ing
kinship,
usually means
siiny. By he
way, his
le e is he
only one in
which he
add ess o
he
add essee is
used no only
a he
beginning o
he le e ,
bu also in i s
inal pa :
“B o he ! I
can’ inge
mysel [...]”.
The las
le e s o K.
Jokan we e
w i en in
1925, when Sis
was Minis e
o Educa ion.
Now he one
o mos o
Jablonski’s
le e s is
somewha
di e en .
The e a e
also
di e en
ypes o
choice.
Almos all
le e s a e
o icially
ini ia ed,
indica ing he
add essee's
posi ion:
Minis y o
Educa ion:
Minis . J.
Jokan u ; K.
Jokan ui,
Minis e o
Educa ion; K.
Jokan ui,
Minis y o
Educa ion.
Some imes,
a e he
naming o a
pe son, a
espec ul
add ess is
used, and
some imes,
wi hou an
add ess a
all, he
essence o
he ma e is
discussed.
S ill, in a
couple o
le e s o
he minis e ,
we ind a
ce ain
Simeon. In one
o hem,
dealing wi h
ma e s o
he
o ma ion o
he
Te minology
Commission,
he
add essee is
no
men ioned a
all and he
add essee is
add essed in
La in: Sa/ e,
Ca issime
(1925 03 16),
and in he
o he , dealing
wi h J.
Jablonski's
summe
plans, he
add essee is
called Dea
(1925 05 07). I
is pe missible
o say ha ,
al hough J.
Jablonskis
usually
espec ed
some
subo dina ion
in his le e s,
he s ill
allowed
himsel no
only o show
espec bu
also o
exp ess his
eelings.
O he noun
o ms a e
a e in J.
Jablonski's
le e s. F om
1906 o 1917,
when he me
wi h his
b o he
Kons an ina-
s, he used o
e e o him
as a keli
(only once in
his le e s he
used
my/imamas).
In he Psko
a’y pe iods,
J. Saulius was
e e ed o
wice as
au ie / (1903
01 26; 1903 02
01). Once in a
le e o J.
Balcikonius
we ind he
add ess
P / e i (1926
12 29). Miisy
day posi ion,
i 's a cle ical,
mos ly
ela ed o
law
en o cemen
agencies,
o icial
appeal.
Acco ding o
A.
Kucinskai é,
i is sui able
only o
o ices
supe ised by
he law
(Ku inskai é
1985: 64).
Knowing ha
J. Jablonskis
and J.
Balcikonis
we e
ex emely
close and
iendly, such
an add ess
seems
s ange. Bu
i s essence
was e ealed
by he
con en o
he ime. A
his ime, J.
Jablonskis
in i es J.
Balčikonis o
collabo a e
wi h he
newspape
“Lie u is”.
Thus, he
choice o he
add ess
pi/ie /p obab-
ly is no
de e mined
by he
ela ionship
be ween he
co esponde-
n s, bu by a
b oade
con ex — he
ac i i y o be
encou aged,
and pe haps
e en he
name o he
day. O he
usisky
laiskuy
add esses.
These le e s
a e usually
add essed o
a ious
scien is s
and o icials.
IS all in
Russian
w i en
le e s 4
add essed o
J. Baléikoni.
Only one o
he le e s
begins wi h
he add ess
Do ogos
Kollega,
whose
equi alen
dea
colleague has
no been
ound in
Li huanian
le e s. In
o he le e s
w i en in
Russian, his
e e ence is
also no longe
used. They
a e
add essed
acco ding o
he usual
adi ions o
Russian
usage: he
name o he
pe son is
indica ed,
o en
accompanied
by a ious
epi he s.
When
add essing
pe sons in
high
posi ions, J.
Jablonskis
chooses
highly
elabo a ed
add esses.
The le e s
o A. Byko ,
Chai man o
he Russian
Language and
Li e a u e
Depa men
o he S .
Pe e sbu g
Academy o
Sciences,
begin: Vase
Vysokop e o-
schodi els -
o, Mylos i ij
Gosuda ,
A anasij
Fiodo o ic (09
May 1897: 21
Ma ch 1899).
To he ec o
o he
Moscow
Uni e si y G.
I ano w o e:
Vase
P e oschodi-
els o
Monogou az-
ajemy
Aleksej
Aleksand o -
ic (1888 03 09).
In he same
s yle J.
Jablonsky
add essed
and | his
p o esso iy
N.
Tichon a o -
a: Vase
P e oschod!-
els o
Nikolaj Sa ic
(1888 10 04).
The le e o
he w i e V.
Ko olenko
begins wi h
he add ess
Mylos i ij
Gosuda ,
wi hou
speci ying
he
add essee's
name and
su name.
O he
ecipien s,
usually
colleagues,
a e
add essed
less
en husias ic-
ally, bu he
name and
su name
mus be
accompanied
by espec ul
ad e bs (e.g.,
1896 06 04 and
1901 02 03
le e s). | A.
Sachma o a,
wi h u ius. J.
Jablonski was
linked o
259
Jusky Zodyn
by a
long-s anding
coope a ion,
add essed
se e al
imes:
Mnogou aza-
jemy Aleksey
Aleksand o -
ic (11 Janua y
1897; 1 Ap il
1897; 1
Feb ua y
1901; 14
Sep embe
1901 and
o he s);
Dob eisij
Aleksand
Aleksand o -
ic (10
Decembe
1900; 18 Ap il
1901;
Decembe
1901 men.; 7
Janua y 1902
and o he s);
Glubokou az-
ayemij
Aleksey
Aleksand o i-
ch (1914 09 20).
I should be
no ed ha J.
Jablonski
used he las
ph ase no
when w i ing
some
ques ions o
linguis ics,
bu when
asking o
help o his
alen ed
s uden . In
le e s o
o he
ecipien s,
he ad e b
mnogou aza-
jemij is
usually used.
Sepa a e
men ion
should be
made o J.
Jablonski’s
add esses
used in his
le e s o
P o esso
Edua das
Vol e is. IS 4
published 3
le e s in
Russian, 0 one
in Li huanian.
In all his
Russian-lang-
uage
w i ings, J.
Jablonski
add esses
Mnogou aza-
jemij Edua d
Aleksand o -
ic (Decembe
1894 — Janua y
1895; 02 06 1885;
02 15 1905), as
he does o
many o his
colleagues.
The add ess
o he le e
w i en in
Li huanian is
much wa me
- Mano
b angusis (19
Ma ch 1926).
Maybe i
shows he
bi-duali y
ha has
a isen o e a
long pe iod o
communica i-
on, maybe i
was chosen
o adap o
he occasion
o he 70 h
anni e sa y
o he au ho
(E. Vol ai e is
cong a ula -
ed “ eaching
70 yea s o
age”), o
maybe i
e lec s he
equi emen s
o Li huanian
and Russian
language
s yle? So a ,
he e is oo
li le ma e ial
o answe
his ques ion
exac ly, bu
p obably he
di e en
app oach is
esponsible
o all h ee
ac o s. As
al eady
men ioned, o
all published
le e s only
one was in
Polish. Jis
260

dedica ed
o he
Polish
linguis and
olklo is J.
Ka lo iciui.
Sio laisko
kesiphays
i in
a inuo as:
Dea and
kind Lo d! -
Oh, my God!
The analysis
o he
add ess
used by
John
Jablonski
shows ha
se e al
ac o s
in luenced
his choice. I
can be said
ha J.
Jablonski
espec ed
he
adi ions
o each
language
( his is
shown by his
wo ks in
Russian and
Polish). The
adi ion o
w i ing
le e s in
Li huanian
language
was no ye
es ablished,
so in his
le e s J.
Jablonskis
only
ecen ly
began o
use i .
Compa ing
he le e s
w i en in
di e en
languages
we see ha
J. Jablonskis
did no apply
he p inciple
o
mechanical
ansla ion,
bu chose a
speci ic,
Li huanian
way o
co espond-
ing
epis ola y
communica-
ion. His
Li huanian
le e s a e
simple ,
close o
he spoken
language
han o he
high s yle. I
seems ha
J. Jablonski
ook in o
accoun he
public
posi ion o
he
add essee
when
choosing
add esses.
Mos o en
in J.
Jablonski's
ime, people
we e
add essed
by he
j a dZiuo i-
né
bid a dZiy
o ms, he
noun
Sauksminin-
ku was much
less
common.
LITERATURA
DLKG
-G amma
o
con empo -
a y La ian
language,
Vilnius:
Mokslas,199-
4. Jablonskis
J. 1957:
Selec ed
wo ks
ound/1,
Vilnius:
Vals ybiné
poli inés i
mokslinés
li e a i os
leidykla.
Jablonskis J.
1985:
Le e s o
Jon
Jablonskis,
Vilnius:
Mokslas.
Jablonskis J.
1991:
A icles and
Le e s,
Vilnius:
Mokslas.
Fillmo C.
1981: Delo 0
padeze.
-No oye
za ubeznom
ling is ike
10,
Ling is ich-
eskaya
seman ika,
Moscow.
Kuéinskai é
A. 1985:
Li huanian
language
e ique e,
Vilnius:
Mokslas.
LKG I
-Lie u iy
kalbos
g ama ika
1, Vilnius:
Min is,
1965. LKG
IU
-Lie u iy
kalbos
g ama ika
3, Vilnius:
Mokslas,
1976.
Pi oékinas
A. 1978: J
Jablonskis
—bend inés
kalbos
puoselé o-
jas,
Vilnius:
Mokslas.
Rosinas A.
1988: Bal y
kalby
j a dziai,
Vilnius:
Mokslas.
WORDS OF
ADDRESS
IN J.
JABLONS-
KIS’
LETTERS
Summa y
The
majo i y
J.
Jablonski-
s’ le e s
a e
w i en in
Li huanian
(373), pa
o hem
a e
w i en in
Russian
(50) and
only one
—in Polish.
In he
Li huanian
le e s
he
ad ess is
usually
some
o m o
adjec i e.
The o m
Ge biama-
sis is used
e y
o en.
Some im-
es we
come
ac oss
b angusis
and e y
seldom
mylimasis.
The e a e
ex ended
add ess
o ms
consis ing
o
adjec i -
es and
nouns:
mano
mylimasis,
mano
b angusis,
mylimas
d auge,
b angus
d auge.
Only once
J.
Jablonskis
uses he
colloquial
o m
S eikas
gy as! The
pe son
whom he
add esses
is no
known o
us. The
add ess
consis ing
o a
oca i e
noun is
no
ypical o
hese
le e s.
The o m
b olau
apea s
a he
only
equen -
ly and
Va ke/i is
used o
add ess
his son
Kons an i-
nas. J.
Jablonskis
add esses
V. Kudi ka
wi h e y
wo m
wo ds:
Vincu i
B olau.
The e a e
no mo e
pe sonal
names in
he
le e s
w i en in
Li huania-
n. The
add esses
in he
le e s
w i en in
Russian
a e qui e
di e en .
We come
ac oss
numbe o
epi he s
used
oge he
wi h
names and
pa onym-
ics: Vase
Vysokop -
e oschodi-
els o
A anasij
Fyodo o i-
ch,
Milos i ij
Gosuda
Ga il
A anasje-
ic, Vase
P e osch-
odi els o
Aleksej
Aleksand -
o ic,
Mnogou a-
zajemij
Aleksey
Aleksand -
o ic.
P o ess-
o E.
Vol e is
add essed
wi h he
wo ds
Mnogou a-
zajemij
Edua d
Aleksand -
o i¢ in he
Russian
le e s,
and wi h
he wo ds
Mano
b angusis
in he
Li huanian
le e s.
The
261
add esses
in he
le e s
w i en in
Polish o
he
amous
linguis J.
Ka lo ich
a e e y
e ined:
Szanowny
i askawy
Panie! - Oh,
my God! I
could be
said ha
J.
Jablonskis
conside -
ed he
e ique e
o he
le e s
w i en in
he
Li huanian
language
mo e
simple,
close o
he
colloquial
speech
which
does no
demand a
highe
s yle.
Tha is
why close
people and
hose
ha ing
many
hings in
common
wi h J.
Jablonskis
a e
usually
add essed
wa mly-b-
olau, in
o he
cases
adjec i -
es
axp essi-
ng
espec
a e used.
The same
pe son
can be
add essed
in
di e en
ways
depending
on
whe he
J.
Jablonskis
w i es o
him as o
samebody
highe in
o ice o
o a
pe son
sha ing
common
ideas. His
le e s
e idence
ha J.
Jablonskis
paid g ea
a en ion
o he
posi ion
he
pe son he
was
w i ing o
occupied,
as well as
o hei
pe sonal
ela ions-
hip,
choosing
he
language
acco ding-
ly.
262