scieee Science in your language
[lt] (orig) [en] [de] [fr] [it] [es] [pt]

Ona Aleknavičienė & Grasilda Blažienė. Povilo Frydricho Ruigio gramatika „Anfangsgründe einer Littauischen Grammatick“, 1747. Faksimilė, kritinis leidimas, vertimas. Ona Aleknavičienė & Grasilda Blažienė. Povilas Frydrichas Ruigys. Monografija, gramatikos

Read accessible full text
Machine-translated document

This is a machine-generated translation of the original document and may contain errors, omissions, or changes in meaning. Do not rely on this translation for quotations, citations, or authoritative references. Please consult and cite the original document.

Ona Aleknavičienė & Grasilda Blažienė. Povilo Frydricho Ruigio gramatika „Anfangsgründe einer Littauischen Grammatick“, 1747. Faksimilė, kritinis leidimas, vertimas. Ona Aleknavičienė & Grasilda Blažienė. Povilas Frydrichas Ruigys. Monografija, gramatikos

Author: Daniel Petit
Year: 2021
DOI: 10.35321/all85-16
Source: https://journals.lki.lt/actalinguisticalithuanica/article/download/2134/2255
Recenzijos / Re iews 331
DANIEL PETIT
École No male Supé ieu e, Pa is ORCID:
h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0001-8432-5600 Fields o esea ch:
Bal ic s udies, Indo-Eu opean s udies.
DOI: doi.o g/10.35321/all85-16
Ona Alekna ičienė & G asilda Blažienė
POVILO FRYDRICHO
RUIGIO GRAMATIKA
ANFANGSGRÜNDE EINER
LITTAUISCHEN GRAMMATICK,
1747. FAKSIMIL, KRITINIS
LEIDIMAS, VERTIMAS.
Vilnius: Lie u ių kalbos ins i u as, 2020, 564 p. ISBN 978-609-
411-264-5
Ona Alekna ičienė & G asilda Blažienė
POVILAS FRYDRICHAS RUIGYS.
MONOGRAPHIE, GRAMATIKOS
INDEKSAI.
Vilnius: Lie u ių kalbos ins i u as, 2020, 414 p. ISBN 978-609-
411-265-2
The Li huanian g amma ical adi ion goes back o he se en een h cen u y
cen u y, o e a cen u y a e he i s documen s w i en in he Li huanian
language. The i s g amma by Daniel Klein (1653) was ollowed by an unb oken
chain o g amma ical wo ks un il he nine een h cen u y. Among hese ea ly
g amma s o Li huanian, he An angsg ünde eine Li auischen G amma ick by
Paul F ied ich Ruhig (1747) occupy a special posi ion. Fo he majo i y o us, he
name ‘Ruhig e okes Philipp Ruhig (16751749), who au ho ed a pa h-b eaking
DANIEL PETIT
332 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXV ea ise on he Li huanian language
(Be ach ung de Li auischen Sp ache, in ih em U sp unge, Wesen und
Eigenscha en, 1745) and a dic iona y (Li auischDeu sches und
Deu sch-Li auisches Lexicon, 1747). His son, Paul F ied ich Ruhig (ca
1721-1722-a e 1784), is no as well known, bu his name emains associa ed wi h
he An angsg ünde (1747), a g amma o Li huanian published in Königsbe g
oge he wi h his a he s dic iona y. Acco ding o Zinke ičius (1990: 260), Paul
F ied ich Ruhigs g amma is based on no es aken by his a he , wi h a s ong
in luence o p e ious wo ks such as Klein (1653), Sappuhn & Schul z (1673) and Hack
(1730). The p esen wo k, published join ly by Ona Alekna ičienė & G asilda
Blažienė, is a c i ical edi ion o he An angsg ünde accompanied by a monog aphy
on i s au ho and on he cul u al con ex in which i was published. acsimile
The edi o s a e o be hanked o making a ailable o he schola ly communi y
his impo an miles one in he his o y o he Li huanian language.
The p esen book consis s o wo olumes. The i s olume con ains a
edi ion o he o iginal ex (I 51226), a c i ical edi ion o he Ge man ex on he
le accompanied by a Li huanian ansla ion on he igh (I 227553) and inally a
egis e o no ions, pe sons and places (I 555563). The second olume con ains a
biog aphy o Paul F ied ich Ruhig by G asilda Blažienė (II 17121), an o e all
p esen a ion o his g amma by Ona Alekna ičienė
(II271) and a conclusion on he alue o his g amma in he his o y o Li huanian
philology co-w i en by bo h au ho s (II 273276), ollowed by Ge man summa y (II 277277), a
comple e wo d conco dance (II 289123379), a bibliog aphy (II 380402) and an index o
pe sonal names (II 403413). I is ex emely use ul, and e en down igh essen ial, o ha e
he e a acsimile o he An angsg ünde (I 51226): his opens a di ec access o he ex
and sheds ligh on i s ma e ial p esen a ion. In he o ewo d o he g amma , Paul
F ied ich Ruhig sch eib dass he edac ion o his ex was ini ia ed by his a he ,
who had o ace some obs acles and he e o e asked his son o eplace him. The
g amma i sel is bo h adi ional and inno a i e. In many aspec s, i e lec s a
long-s anding adi ion o g amma ical desc ip ion, beginning wi h ‘le e s
(Buchs aben), i.e. o hog aphy and phone ics, hen mo ing o wo d o ma ion and
declension (nouns, adjec i es, p onouns, e bs) and ending wi h a ew obse a ions on
syn ax. The g amma has exac ly he same s uc u e as Sappuhn & Schul z (1673) and
Hack (1730), bu is conside ably mo e de eloped han Klein (1653), who has no sec ion on
syn ax, and he Uni e si as Lingua um Li uaniae (1737), whose sec ion on syn ax is
p e y puny. The g amma is w i en in Ge man, on a pa wi h Daniel Kleins Compendium
Li uanico-Ge manicum (1654) and Hacks Ku zge ass e Li hauische G amma ic (1630),
whe eas he majo i y o p e ious wo ks was in La in (Klein 1653, Sappuhn, Schul z 1673,
Uni e si as 1737). The choice o he Ge man language, mo i a ed by he in ended
eade ship, implies
Ona Alekna ičienė & G asilda Blažienė
Po ilo F yd icho Ruigio g ama ika
Po ilas F yd ichas Ruigys. Monog a ija, g ama ikos indeksai
Re enzionen Re iews 333 e minological choices, pa icula ly o g amma ical
ca ego ies o o ma ions ha a e no ep esen ed in La in o Ge man. / As a ule, he
La in e minology is simply inco po a ed in he Ge man ex and applied o he
Li huanian language wi hou oo much di icul y, ei he di ec ly (e.g. Vocales ‘ owels,
Consonan es ‘consonan s, Nomina ‘nouns, Conjunc iones ‘conjunc ions,
P aeposi iones ‘p eposi ions, Ve ba ac i a and passi a ‘ac i e and passi e e bs, e c.),
mo e a ely h ough Ge man (e.g. Syllben ‘syllables). The use o he La in e m Ancipi es
(I 69); i is ul ima ely based on he G eek e m δίχρονοι ‘o wo quan i ies used by
‘ wo-headed ( owels)’ o e e o owels ha a e bo h sho o long is s iking
Dionysos Th ax. G amma ical ca ego ies a e usually iden i ied wi h hose o La in.
Th ee gende s a e asc ibed o Li huanian adjec i es, Masculinum ‘masculine,
Fœmininum ‘ eminine and Neu um ‘neu e (I 100). The condi ional (e.g. būčiau ‘I would be)
is called Modus Conjunc i us ‘conjunc i e mood (I 134). The s ong La in empla e may
easily each i s limi s, in pa icula o he desc ip ion o he case sys em, whe e
Li huanian is said (I 85) o possess six cases like La in (Nomina i us ‘nomina i e,
Geni i us ‘geni i e, Da i us ‘da i e, Accusa i us ‘accusa i e, Voca i us ‘ oca i e and
Abla i us ‘abla i e), he la e subdi ided in o an Ins umen .The ‘ins umen al (e.g.
Li hs a g Li h good one) a e p esen ed as adjec i e combined wi h he ‘demoni e
p onoun o ms (I 109q), bu do no ecei e any speci ic name. The g amma ocuses on
and a Localis ‘loca i e’ (e.g. Li h. danguje), which is a i icial. De ini e adjec i es
he Li huanian language as i was spoken a he mid-eigh een h cen u y in Eas P ussia
(based on he dialec s o Ins e bu g, nowadays Черняховск, and Ragni , nowadays
Неман), bu includes a sec ion on o he dialec s (I 195198, c . also II 223234), in which, in e
alia, one inds a b ie , bu in e es ing men ion o he Samogi ian s ess e ac ion (I
196). I is ich in obse a ions on ine-g ained de ails o he Li huanian g amma and
es i ies o a good command o he language. In some aspec s, Ruhigs g amma
ep esen s a signi ican ad ance o e i s p edecesso s. The Li huanian one sys em,
gene ally o e looked in p e ious wo ks (wi h he excep ion o he Uni e si as, 1737), is
submi ed o a b ie o e iew (I 7274), using he Ancien G eek e minology (Acu us
‘acu e, G a is ‘g a e, Ci cum lexus ‘ci cum lex). The aspec ual use o he p e e b
beis duly signaled in a sec ion on ‘con inua i e e bs (Con inua, I 169), e.g. Li h. Beeimi ich
gehe so nach und nach o ‘I am going con inuously. The sec ion on syn ax (I 199220)
spiegel he p edominan app oach o syn ax a ha ime, limi ed o a ew ques ions
such as g amma ical ag eemen , he unc ions o cases, he syn ax o p eposi ions,
and inally some e y b ie commen s on wo d o de . I does no a oid he common
p ejudices o he ime, in pa icula he idea ha ce ain syn ac ic con igu a ions can
be ega ded as mo e ‘na u al han o he s. Ruhig, o example, p esen s he
DANIEL PETIT
334 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXV wo d o de [noun + geni i e] in Sunùs Diewo
‘Son o God as na ü lich ‘na u al (I 218), wi hou pu ing o wa d any g ound in
ha ega d. An impo an componen o any g amma ical desc ip ion lies in i s
exempli ica ion. Mos o he Li huanian examples ound in he An angsg ünde seem
o be d awn om eligious ex s, in pa icula om he ansla ion o he Bible.
The eligious ph aseology is omnip esen ; in some cases, Ruhig e en indica es he
G eek o Heb ew sou ce. O he examples seem o e lec he daily use o he
language. I is no di icul o ack down examples om p e ious g amma s: one
may compa e, o example, Ge iù Wandens ‘I d ink wa e (I 209, G eek πίνω δατος,
Ge man ich inke Wasse ) wi h Ge iu Wandenio (Sappuhn, Schul z 1673: 80, G eek
πίνω δατος, La in Bibo aq am), o Důk mán Důn mi ‘gi e me some b ead (I 209,
Ge man giebôs B o ) wi h Důk man
Důnôs (Hack 1730: 333).
The acsimile is ollowed by a c i ical edi ion o he Ge man ex on he le and i s
Li huanian ansla ion on he igh (I 227553). The use ulness o his ansla ion is
immedia ely ob ious, because i makes he ex a ailable o he Li huanian
eade ship ha can be un amilia wi h he Ge man language. T ansla ing in o
Mode n Li huanian a Li huanian g amma w i en in Ge man in he eigh een h
cen u y is no an easy ask, no only owing o he di icul y o he language i sel ,
bu abo e all because o he a ious p oblems aised by he choice o e minological
equi alen s. The ansla ion is ex emely p ecise and may be used wi h con idence. I
is p obably no useless o poin ou a o m o ch onological pa adox, howe e : he
Li huanian linguis ic e minology used in his ansla ion is gene ally ha
es ablished by Jonas Jablonskis (and o he s) a he beginning o he wen ie h
cen u y, i.e. almos wo cen u ies a e Ruhigs g amma . In mos cases, his
e minological ans e is ha mless: Genus Neu um is ende ed by be a dė giminė (I
100), In ini i us by bend a is (I 128), Modus by nuosaka (I 129), e c., which causes no
p oblem o unde s anding. Some imes, he e minological equi alence is mo e
challenging. I ha e al eady men ioned he La in e m ancipi es ‘ wo-headed used o
e e o owels ha a e ei he sho o long; i has no equi alen in Li huanian. I is
ende ed he e by s y uojančiosios balsės ‘hesi a ing owels (I 251), which is a e all
a good op ion. In a small numbe o cases, one could p opose a di e en ansla ion.
The La in e m Deduc io (li e ally ‘leading away) is ende ed in Li huanian ei he by
edyba (e.g. I 367) o by da yba (e.g. I 372). I would sugges o choose a uni o m
ansla ion and pe haps mo e p ecisely o ende La in deduc io by de i acija.
These a e mino de ails, which do no comp omise he e y high quali y o he
Li huanian ansla ion.
The second olume places Paul F ied ich Ruhig and his g amma in hei p ope
con ex . I begins wi h a biog aphy o Paul F ied ich Ruhig by G asilda
Ona Alekna ičienė & G asilda Blažienė
Po ilo F yd icho Ruigio g ama ika
Po ilas F yd ichas Ruigys. Monog a ija, g ama ikos indeksai
Bewe ungen Re iews 335 /
Blažienė (II 17121). Li le is known abou Ruhigs li e, and he b ie men ions ha can be
ound in he li e a u e a e despe a ely sho .1 E en his da es o bi h and dea h a e
no known wi h p ecision. Mos sou ces indica e ca 1725 o his bi h, a e 1781 o
his dea h, bu Blažienės wo k p oposes di e en da es (ca 1721/1722-a e 1784). Paul
F ied ich Ruhigs bi h place was Wal e kehmen (now Ольховатка) in Eas P ussia. He
began o s udy in Königsbe g in 1740; he was bound o he Li huanian Semina y, whe e
he augh o a ew yea s. La e , he appea o ha e wo ked as a p o es an chu ch
minis e in La ia since 1752 and o ha e been e en ually epa ia ed o Königsbe g
due o men al illness. We lose ack o him a e 1784. The biog aphy by G asilda
Blažienė (II 17121) is he mos ex ensi e ea men o Ruhigs li e o da e. I con ains
all a ailable documen s on he li e and ac i i y o he Ruhig amily, including
p e iously unknown manusc ip le e s. Paul F ied ich Ruhigs da e o bi h (ca
1721:1722) can be in e ed om his posi ion as he elde b o he in he amily (be o e
his b o he Ch is ian Geo g, bo n in 1724:1725) and om his uni e si y egis a ion in
1740 (II 7374). His dea h, commonly supposed o ha e aken place a e 1781, can now be
pos pone o a sligh ly la e da e, since he is s ill men ioned as ali e in 1784 (II 74). The
spa se in o ma ion ha we possess on his li e be o e he publica ion o his
g amma is limi ed o his uni e si y egis a ion in Königsbe g (1740: Paul F ied ich
Ruhig, Wal e kaimensis Bo uss), his au og aph applica ion o m o g an (1743), he
only documen w i en in his own hand ha has been p ese ed, and a ew men ions
o he Li huanian semina y, wo he was ac i e du ing he 1740s. In he o ewo d o his
dic iona y, his a he Philip Ruhig men ions ha he en us ed his son o w i e a
Li huanian g amma . Ruhigs g amma appa en ly had g ea success a e i s
publica ion in 1747. I was men ioned as an impo an sou ce by Go ied
Os e meye (17161800) in his Neue Li auische G amma ik (1791). Johann Se e in Va e
(17711826) uses i in he amous encyclopedia o languages Mi h ida es (1809: 706).
Ruhigs la e li e is less known, and we ha e no p ecise sou ces on his ac i i y in Riga,
on his men al illness and on his dea h. This sec ion is e y well-w i en and
in o ma i e; i enhances conside ably ou knowledge on he cul u al ac o s who
ha e con ibu ed o he p og ess o Li huanian philology in he eigh een h cen u y.
The nex sec ion is a p esen a ion o he An angsg ünde by Ona Alekna ičienė (II 123271).
Ruhigs g amma was i s in ended o he pa icipan s in he Li huanian semina y in
Königsbe g, many o whom could unde s and and speak Li huanian only impe ec ly (II 126);
his explains he choice o Ge man as he common language sha ed by all o hem. In
compa ison wi h p e ious wo ks, 1 C . Bi žiška (II 120121), Zinke ičius (1990: 260), Lie u iu
kalbos enciklopedija (LKE 2008: 459).

DANIEL PETIT
336 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXV
Ruhigs g amma is ela i ex ensi e and de ailed, which accoun s o a la ge pa o i s
success in he ollowing decades as one o he majo e e ence g amma s o
Li huanian. Alekna ičienė u he desc ibes he ma e ial shape o he book edi ed in
1747, i s o ma , i s sc ip , i s pa a ex (II 135). Mos in e es ing is he i s po en ial
sec ion abou in e ex uali y in Ruhig’s g amma (II 152sq.), compa ing i wi h
sou ces (Klein, Sappuhn & Schul z, Hack). Es illus ie pe ek dass li auische philologie
ha ollowed, in seinen e schiedenen his o ischen Pe ioden, he common h ead o a
sha ed cul u al iden i y und soll e nich als die eme gence on some isola ed indi iduals
in a con ex wo he Li huanian language was s ill ela i p eca ious in e ms o i s
sociolinguis ic s a us. The es o he sec ion p o ides a ho ough desc ip ion o he
Li huanian language documen ed in Ruhigs g amma , i s o hog aphy and phone ics (II
234248), i s mo phology (II 249252). Mo e han 9000 Li huanian wo d o ms a e a chaic s age
o de elopmen , wi h he dual numbe s ill ully ali e (II 249), wi h all ou seconda y
ansmi ed. The Li huanian language in Ruhig’s g amma appea s in a ela i ely
loca i e cases s ill in use (II 249), wi h condi ional o ms in -b- (II 252), wi h compa a i e
ad e bs in -(i)aus (II 25 e c2), As i s ands, i o e s us a weal h o aluable da a on Eas
P ussia Li huanian a he mideigh een h cen u y.
The e ollows a e y sho conclusion, co-w i en by he wo au ho s, Ona
Alekna ičienė & G asilda Blažienė, s essing he impo ance o Ruhigs
g amma o Li huanian s udies (II 275276). The olume endes wi h a leng hy
Ge man summa y (II 277287), a e y use ul wo d index (II 298379) and a
bibliog aphy (II 380402).
The e is no doub ha his exempla y wo k will emain he e e ence edi ion o Paul
F ied ich Ruhigs An angsg ünde in he yea s o come. I is no only e y well-w i en
in o ma i e, philologically and his o ically impeccable; i is also well-s uc u ed,
and edi ed wi h he u mos ca e. I am e y g a e ul o he edi o s o his excellen
wo k, which en iches conside ably ou knowledge on he de elopmen o Li huanian
philology in he cou se o i s his o y. Als ich zu Li huanian S udies kam an dem Beginn
de 1990s, ku z nach de Unabhängigkei on Li auen, wa ich so o aszinie on
de mush ooming o philological wo k on Old Li huanian ex s, als ob edi ing ea ly
documen s o he Li huanian language was o ha gene a ion o schola s a means
o eco e ing hei iden i y. The p esen book shows ha , e en nowadays, in a wo ld
o globaliza ion and g owing indi e ence owa ds he pas , i is s ill ewa ding o
look back o he legacy o ancien ex s such as his one and o de o e special
a en ion o hei philological su i al.
Daniel Pe i (ENS & EPHE)
Ona Alekna ičienė & G asilda Blažienė
Po ilo F yd icho Ruigio g ama ika
Po ilas F yd ichas Ruigys. Monog a ija, g ama ikos indeksai
Bewe ungen Re iews 337 /
LITERATURE
Bi žiška Vaclo as 19601965: Aleksand ynas. Al ige li auische Sch i s elle s,
ašiusių o 1865 m., Biog aphien, Bibliog aphien und biobibliog a ien 2, XVIIIXIX amžiai, Čikaga: JAV
LB Kul ū as Fondas, 1963.
Daniel 1653: G amma ica Li anica Manda o & Au o i a e Se enissimi Elec o is B andenbu gici
ado na a, & p æ iâ Censu â p imùm in lucem edi a à M. Daniele Klein Klein / Pa o e Til . Li .
P æmi a e ad Lec o em P æ a io non minùs u ilis, quàm nece a ia. [...] Regiomon i, Typis &
ump ibus Johannis Reusne i, Anno χριστογονίας cIɔ Iɔc. LIII [1653]. (Faksimilinis Ausgabe:
Pi moji li auische Sp ache g ama ika, 1653 Jah e), a s. ed. J. K uopas, Vilnius: S aa ybliche
poli ische und wissenscha liche Li e a u en Ve lag, 1957. Daniel Klein 1654: Danielis Kleinii
Compendium Li anico-Ge manicum, Ode Ku und gan deu liche An h ung u Li auschen
Sp ache wie man ech Li auisch lesen sch eiben und eden ol. / Cum P i ilegio S. R. M. Pol. e
Se en. Elec . B andenb, Knigsbe g: Ged uck und e leg du ch Iohann Reusne n, M.D.C.LIV.
LKE 2008 Lie u ių kalbos enciklopedija, pa . K. Mo kūnas, ed. V. Amb azas, 2-asse pa iksl. und
zusä z. Ve ö en lichung, Vilnius: Mokslo und enzyklopedienische Ve lagsins i u .
Os e meye Go ied 1791: Neue Li auische G amma ik, Königsbe g: G. L. Ha ung.
Paulauskienė Aldona 2006: E s es li auischen Sp ache G amma ikos, Vilnius: Gim asis Wo .
Ruhig Philipp 1745: Be ach ung de Li auischen Sp ache, in ih em U sp unge, Wesen und
Eigenscha en; [...] on Philipp Ruhig, P a e n und Senio e u Wal e kehmen, im Haup am
In e bu g. Knigsbe g, d uck s und e leg s Iohann Hein ich Ha ung, 1745. (Faksimilinische
Ve ö en lich, e imas in li auische Sp ache: Pilypas Ruigys, Lie u ių kalbos kilmės, būdo i
sa ybių y inėjimas, pa . Vy au as Ju gu is, Vale ija Vilnony ė, Vilnius: Vaga, Sappuhn
1986).
Ruhig Philipp 1747: Li auiſch-Deu ſches und Deu ſch-Li auiſches Lexicon, [...]
on Philipp Ruhig, P a e n und Senio e ʒu Wal e kehmen, Inſ e bu giſchen Haup am es,
Knigsbe g, d uck s und e leg s I. H. Ha ung, 1747.
Ch is up, Schul z Theo ili 1673: Compendium G amâ icæ Li h anicæ Theophili Schul ens Pas :
Ca eno , Regiomon i: Typis F ide ici Reu ne i, [...] Aō: 1673. (Faksimil-Ausgabe: Sapūno und Šulco
g ama ika), pa . K. Eigminas, B. S undžia, Vilnius: Mokslo und encyclopedijų Ve lagsins i u , 1997.
F ied ich Wilhelm Hack 1730: Vocab la i m Li h anico-ge manic m, e Ge manico-Li h anic m,
Da in alle im Neuen Tes amen und P al e be indliche W e nach dem Alphabe h en hal en
ind; Ein Neb em Anhang eine ku ge a en Li haui chen G amma ic Ausge e ige on
F iede ich Wilhelm Haack S.S. Theol. Cul o e, u ei
DANIEL PETIT
338 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXV
Docen e im Li haui chen Semina io u Halle. Halle, D uck s S ephanus O ban, Uni e .
Buchd . (1730) 2. (S udija, indeksai, odyklės), pa . V. Zubai ienė, Vilnius: Vilniaus
Uni e si ä s Ve lag, 2012.
LLinguua um Li uu Uni e si asaniae 1737 Anoniminė 1737 m. g ama ika ‘Uni e si as
Lingua um Li uaniae, pa . K. Eigminas, Vilnius: Mokslas, 1981. Va e Johan Se e in 1809:
Mi h ida es ode allgemeine Sp achenkunde, Vol. 2, Be lin:
Voss.
Zinke ičius Zigmas 1990: Lie u ių kalbos is o ija 4, Vilnius: Mokslas.
Eingelei e 2021 m. 11. Sep embe d.
DANIEL PETIT
École no male supé ieu e
45, ue dUlm, 75005 Pa is, F ance
daniel.pe[email p o ec ed]