IN LITHUANIAN
LANGUAGES
SANDAROS
STUDIES
IN LITHUANIAN
KALBOTYROS
QUESTION-
S, XXVI
(1987)
II
JUOZAS
ABARAVICIUS
METAPHORA
STRATEGY
J.
BALTUSIO
IN FUEL
The e is a
lo o
ead
abou me apho s.
I has been
calcula ed
ha i
me apho s
a e used
<much a
he same
a e as
now, i
2039
m.
common
me apho s
y éju
skaigius
Pp alenks
y
me y
wo ld
"Zmoniy
skai iy?".
Such a
o ecas
is no
easy o belie e.
Bu indi idual
i
bibliog aphies
p o ide
me apho ical
wo k ha is
wo h
eading.
An ai
1971
m.
V.
In Sibelius's
bibliog aphy,
which includes
wo ks in
yes e day's
languages,
me apho is
mean o mean.
3
posi ion*.
Todél ne
i
A g ea
me apho ologi-
ne
s can always
ha e illusions.
_ju, ha
says wha
he heo y
o
me apho
i
has no
ye
disco e e-
d.
Wi hou claiming
o be a g ea e
i
heo e ical
no el y,
J.
Bal u3io ki iniy
me apho in
he con ex o
communica ion
s a egy.
S a egy is
unde s ood as
a uni o
language such
o ganiza ion,
such
i8dés ymas
acco ding o
he w i e ’s
in en ion
jy
‘and a plan
ha only
con eys
ne
a is ic
in o ma ion,
bu aims o
in luence
he eade ’s
i
eac ions.
i
‘Communica ion’
i
,,me apho “.
Wha can
be in
common
be ween
sa oky
u
?
A
can me apho
be a eliable
means o
communica io-
n?
A e all,
o use a
me apho
—
is o use
Zodj by
ne
di ec ing o
designa e, is,
jo
in Pikéiling’s
wo ds, “ o
J.
make a
‘ e olu ion in
seman ics’”.
jo
Ji
is a seconda y
means o
cha ac e ising
i
he nomina ion.
I is igh ly
said ha he
seman ic
duali y o
me apho does
no ag ee wi h
he usual
su
communica i e
pu pose o he
subjec
—
p edica e o
i
he main
—
elemen o he
sen ence: o
he subjec o
he language,
he symbols
being oo
ji
subjec i e,
he p edica e
needs o
o
—excessi ely,,mi-
glo a“,
ne e -ending*.
In his sense,
he me apho
o he ex is
a p agma ic
ins uc ion o
he eade . I
seems,
accu a ely
he la e
desc ibes
A.
Okopien-Sla inska
Zodiiais:
sqmoningai as
jus such an
unusual
(me apho ic-
al) bid: I wan
you o
unde s and,
ha 's wha
ka
I'm going o
say'.
In mos
cases a
me apho
J.
The analogy
in he
whi e-whi e
can be
desc ibed by
such a
ela i ely
abs ac ed
p agma ic
ins uc ion
o he
eade :
The e
you a e.
He e I w i e
me apho ical-
ly, because I
wan o
con ey in my
own way
pe cei ed,
el ,
ep esen ed
exp ession
essence.
Ja
Reade , see
wha is said
in he
ansla ion
Zodziu
1
Z .
S awinski
J.
Really
mo ed
in o ma ion.
—
Tex s:
Theo y o
li e a u e.
C i icis-
m.
In e p e a io-
1980,
n, no.
6
(54),
s.
1.
?
Shibles
W.
A.
Me apho :
An
Anno a ed
Bibliog aphy
and
His o y.
—
Whi ewa e
(Wisconsin),
1971.
*
Apy ionosa
H.
J,
Me adopa.
—
B
xu. :
The li le
ones.
Ouymxnonequs.
M., ec.
1979,
140,
“
Okopien-S awinska
A.
Me apho
wi hou
limi s.
—
Tex s
1980,
o ..., N .
6
(54),
s.
26.
71
i
jo
con ex .
Such a
s a egic
p agma ic
a i ude o
me apho iza io-
n, as I said, is he
basis o many
me apho s o
pe soni ica ion,
especially
i8plés iniy.
Typical
gia bi y
he
ollowing
example:
Mixkas
p o e b.
La ge,
anspa -
jo
en
aSa os
debéjo on
each
Saku és
i
each lea ,
begged a
a led
winding
wais ,
Swingin'
he
bladde 's
ches ,
enkési
hal y
me igies
i
long hung in
he bi en
spiky ends,
hen ell
o
Zemén,
ku ciai
papséda-
mos j
ilkaZole.
Red Mike
R
IV
55°,
To
unde s a-
nd why he
w i e
unexpec -
edly
changes
he code
—
o
hough , i
akes a lo
o
imagina ion.
(no
,,slenka
Black,
hick
clouds"
i
al eady
»began o
dus «),
—
»swea «
miskq,
iSplés ine
me apho
depic s
,,his ea s”,
i is
—
necessa y o
e alua e all
he signals o
seman ic
signi icance
o such
in o ma ion.
I
ne
only
pe soni ica ion,
i s démens (,, he
o es c ied“,
»dides,
anspa en
aSa os“,,, he
ed o es “...)
jo
ansmi ed,
bu longe
con ex
seman ic
impulses
i
(,,saulé
eka
kazkokia
gels a,
mieguis a“-
,,,bla’kosi
ne amios
a nos“,,,s-
alikelés
Oh, so
cu e.
Siugida“,-
,,ku éiai
Zuzen
ain on
lea es*
i
e c. ).
Wi h all hese
signals o he
impo ance o
he con en ,
he a is ic
whole o he
image, he
i
a is as i
says: mixkas
ap auda
ge iausig
shephe d
,,zmogy’
Jonq.
Thus, in
o de o
p ope ly
unde s and
he con ex
ka
o he
me apho
gi en by he
w i e , i is
necessa y
o ha e
be o e he
eyes he
whole
in e p e a -
o y o he
ex called
he
me apho ,, -
equi ed
ho izon“, o
o he wise
—
‘au o a
associa ions’.
I is known
ha he
s a egic
au ho 's
p o isions,
he
P agma ic
ins uc ion,
o be
meaning ully
i
encoded in
me apho ic-
i
al con ex
and la e o
be b ough
o he
ho izon o
i
desi ed
meaning ul
associa ion-
s, equi es
ce ain
condi ions.
Fi s o all,
eliable signals o
seman ic
ele ance,
con ex ual
mo i a ion® mus
be exposed o he
me apho ’s
su oundings and
o he
in e connec ed
—
componen s o
meaning o med
i
by he me apho
i sel . The eade
mus be
ju
pa icula ly
ca e ul when
me apho izing
—
J.
Fo Bal us i
is a
simul aneous
—
hing,
simul aneous-
ly
encompassing
se e al eal
nomina ions,
namely, bu
con ex ual
mo i a ion
connec s
seman ic
signals o
con en
impo ance
wi h he
hing.
i
Such
me apho iza i-
on we ind, Fo
example,,, in he
ale o
"Jusa".
Remembe
he scenes
a he end
o he no el,
when
,, he e
came
ano he one
Zima".
»Unexpec-
ed, no Called.
I¥
s a clouds,
p i inke
unbea able,
dla iniai.
Ne
in he sky
slinko,
0
p essé
belly
The
i
ea h
c acked,
he ields collapsed
uz
Kai abales
i
paciq
Kai abale.
I
ne
P ope -
a
I'm
lea ing,
o
I'm
lea ing,
I'm lea ing.
Snioks ino
i
in i s
mids ."
Nex , i is
depic ed how
he winds o
he day
swep up
Kai abale,
how all ha
is ali e in i s
ice, caugh
he ba ks
po
Sal is, as
a ound
»g own up
i
onZ audojo
wol es a
nigh “.
I
Finally,
" he los
sleep"
Juzos
,,p omiegiu’’
Seeing
images in
—
he
i
eali y o
ision.
,,Young i s lady
Salciy
isklais in as
[menu],
ue
G oom,
inge s in
hai .
P isélino
a he
house
languy,
a ka iai
I'll ake
j
he money.
Tyli
i
Yes e day.
Zin i, ind
I
a y um
nebe a.
As i
d eaming, as
i wai ing
ko
R
VI
248.
®
The
i
ollowing
examples
a e
i§
p o ided by he au ho
,,.Ras y
(R):
Bal usis
J.
Ra¥ ai,
—
V.,
1981—
1983,
.
1-8
(Roman
nume als
Zymi oma,
a abiSkasis
pages).
—
*
Okopie i-S a i iska
A.
Up.
ci .,
s.
27.
72
Thus, wi h a
no e y
balanced,
mo e
simul aneous,
associa i e,
si ua ional,
su
wi h Juza’s
eelings
ela ed
pe sonaliza i-
on o eali y,
he eade is
p epa ed o
Vinciiné’s
mu
e u n, o
he las
con e sa ion.
su
Juza.
Me apho in
pa icula
in ensi ies
seman ic
p ocesses,
i
which
_,,s a egically*
o ien he
whole
mechanism o
he Ku dish
language.
G ea , o
example, is
he powe o
me apho o
s eng hen,
change he
onali y o
he
na a i e.
Fo example,
when a
o es is
b oken, he
conc e e,
ealis ic
depic ion o
ea changes
o a mo e
ly ical one.
O
pe soni i-
ed images
o na u al
phenomena
i
The
me apho ic
exp ession
o you
isions
ein o ces
he one o
ague likes i,
la e
ansi ioning
o us y
j
Vinci inés
cha
su
You' e a
on.
I is ema kable
i
ha he w i e
me apho ically
c ea es an
indi idual
phenomenon o
na u e,
‘cha ac e j’:
+.
S anding
whi e-shi ed
Be Zas, as i
Heenpjo y
summe
mo ning,
c iipcioja
ebulé like a
ba ma gi l,
he e,
Zi i ék,
s opped uosiy
o
Young man,
squeezed
by a
né
su
swee -sm-
ell-in- he-mou h...'
R
IV
42.
Fo such
me apho iza ion
bidingi
simul aneously
occu ing
»na u e cases«
exp essions,
elie s, de ailed
sculp u es,
indi iduals o
plan s and
animals,,cha ac e-
s*, c ea ed by
me apho izing,
pe soni ying he
ema kably
i
obse ed
cha ac e is ics
jy
(,,s anding
whi e
bi ch“,,,sc e-
aming
d ebulé“...).
O
subjec i e
akiy
cha ac e iy
peculia i ie-
s,
speci ici y
Zymiy
Composi ion
j
makes he image
i
o he whole
objec indi idual,
un epea able.
Some imes
me apho s
ac i a e
The wo d
sequence
ha gi es
he de ail
a symbolic
meaning.
Such a
meaning
acco di-
ng o olk
symboli-
sm has
ka kly
k au jas
win e
—
ed
,, ik om
ziedy
hapu ém“
lowe ing
ca na ions.
Plg. :
Al eady
he i s
@ asa q
po
ka klyu
blood ell
wa
Zmonéms
on he
head
R
VI
143.
ISplés iniy
me a o y,
symboliy
sense can be
iden i ied,
based on he
signals o he
impo ance
o he
con en o
he a
in o ma ion,
going
i8
The
seman ic
po en ial
o he
wo d, i s
su
meaning in con ex .
I8
he ising
ho izon o
he need
o ha
knowledge,
as well as
he w i e 's
i
s a egic
posi ions,
should be
kep in mind
e en when
edi ing
indi idual
ex s
Zodj.
I
so a
abs ac
s a emen s
abou
s a egic
p o isions can
be conc e ed.
A e all,
we ha e
i
he
w i e 's
own
hough s
abou
indi idual
images,
a chi ec-
i
u al de ails, e c.
Ano he
hough
o such a
w i e
can
easonab-
ly be
conside -
ed ypical
he
in e p e a i-
on o he
e m ‘p agma ic ins uc ions’.
Cia ik y
ememb-
e dél
,,Pa duo u
asa ą“
language
co ec i-
no
on caused
con o e-
sy.
Akad.
J.
Baléikonis,
as
O
cou se,
among
o he
hings,
i
he e
a e
co ec i-
ons o such a sen ence om he a o emen ioned no el:
,,a ie yno
pa énéje
dainuoja
(=
zyzia,
z imbia)
d unk
om he
sun
mosqui o-
“?.
RaSy ojas
J.
Bal uSis
ne
one
occasion
a
aisymag
is
emembe ed.
“Jus as you
say in Sold
Summe s,”
said he
au ho , “a
mosqui o
—
sings in he
ineya d,
—
d unk om
he sun”, I
was
immedia ely
old ha a
mosqui o
canno sing,
i can only
squeal.”
RaS8y ojas
being déking o
linguis s who
e ealed
,,g ea uode
zyzimo
sec e *,
bu unable
o use he
e idence,
ju
since i a3ius
,,zyzia
d unk
om he
sun
mosqui -
o“, sumen-
7
Baléikonis
J.
Sis as
dél
,,Saldu u
asa y“
language.
—
Kn. :
Selec ed
wo ks.
V.,
1978,
.
1,
p.
288.
73
inished a
pain ing
depic ing
»Swaiginan i
asa os
idu dienio
g ožj,
neiSsemiama
saulés
The
abundan-
ce o
hea , he
g ea ness o all na u e
§ en e”.
O
he
au ho o
his image
needs
iS ySkin i
old
Di da o
smallness.
Ne
in ain
po
This
ideo
goes
Di dos liga
mi is®, Thus a
i
e y speci ic
p agma ic
»di ec i e« o
he w i e , as
should be
unde s ood by
he chosen
me apho ical,
pe soni ied
The
meaning o he wo d.
The eade ,
o cou se,
can only ely
on he
abs ac ed
c ea ion,
agmen
jo
such
,,Di ec i e."
Bu
e e ence is
needed.
This is no
in ended
o be some
a bi e o
he
polemic,
especially
Zodj.
Bu i
seems
ha a
he
w i e 's
will a
mosqui o
i
can sing.
Toki eiki
a ian
He e
p esuppos-
es e en
minimal
con ex ,,d-
unk om
O he wise,
ega dless o
—
ic ion
i
speci ici y,
me apho iza ion
mo i a ion,
objec i es, can
be demanded, only
—
when espec ing
pe soni ica ion,
an h opomo phi-
c; iza ional igh
a
ha na u e
C ea u es
‘bil y’
only
,,in his own
oice”, e.g.
—
wol es
ne
»uzg o y
i
uz audo y
nak imis“,
0
s aug y,
ha
Si mis
ne
,,disau y,
o
Z eng y
ba n“.
O
The w i e
o his
c edo
—
“I belie e in
spi i ualiza -
ion”
—
some imes
mo i a es
mo e
consis en ly, pab éZia.
This is
how he
no el
chap e
begins:
,,M .
iXhea d
once
nakéia:
disauja
Si mis in
he ba n.
I 's ha d
o b ea he.
T ue
The
Human Voice
R
VI
101.
I 's igh o say
ha
me apho iza i-
on s imula es
he p ope ies
o eali y,
o
ne
ZodZio
eikSmé®.
This is
especial-
ly ue o
he
J.
Whi e is a
me apho ic-
al s imulus.
Ne
local case
nu
w i e
would say
,,Na u e
i8
pain ing“ is
a
me apho i-
cal elie
image,
a
caused by
di ec imp ession.
S ai koks
Plas iSkas
clouds
iew, seen
lying o
Ame ica:
below, as
a as you
+++
0
can see,
calm clouds
snow lake-
s.
On one side
he e a e
j
an as ic
ocks
b eaking ou
o he
g ound, in
some places
su
moun ain
anges, deep
da k go ges,
i
sloping
ou c ops,
elsewhe e,
Zi ék,
sun-d ench-
ed
moun ains,
goodhea ed
gian s...“
R
III
112.
Me apho s
o en condense
he eal ac s
ha a e in he
pe cep ion o
he si ua ion,
while ecalling
he w i e 's
spon aneous
eelings.
This is how
he momen
is exp essed
in con ex ,
whe e i is
depic ed as
Juza
wan s o
& emo e
i
aki a o
Ka usés
la ona:
E en
b ea hed a sigh
Ka usé.
I was
i
like a eal
b ea h.
I
wai ed
un il
Yuza
paguldy -
uy
jq
i
wo en
chip in a
co in
ca ed
wi h you
own hands
R
VI
87.
Me apho
helps o
make
sense o
wha
i
Somehow keeps
he eade
démesj. Being a
peculia dominan
o he hough , i
is well combined
wi h eal owns.
Ob iously, he
space o he
a is ic ex ,
h ough which he
su
seman ic
me apho ac s,
becomes a s ong
seman ic
s uc u al
elemen o he
whole. The
pa allelism
be ween he main
and he
me apho ized
The modi ied,
ans e able
i
meaning o
he wo d
c ea es a
e e ence
duali y, wi h
emphasis,
o
a ising dél
i
new
me apho ic,,-
i-
"Ziya's usual
i
pe cep ion
compa ison-
".
Pyz. :
Uzkabino
Juza
honeyco-
mb esidue
Si os
mowing,
i
i
mou h,
an
lieZu io
i
po
I'll ell
I
i
him.
Zaibai in
he eyes,
i
i is such
ha
Zemé
I was a
po
nigh ma e.
i
®
Bal uSis
J.
Abou
he
wo k.
—
Kn. :
Ra& ai.
Vz
1959
se.
7179
®
I 's abou
H.
JI.
Yeah.
co4u.,
c.
140.
74
o collapse.
i§
Né
Build no
eached
Juza,
kniiibsciomis
pooles p ie
Ropes.
(...)
Long ime
ago, I was
in he mud,
in he
wa e ,
0
wi h my
hands in my hands.
ji
i
pe siliedinéjo
whe e
eaching,
un il nuémé
Zaibus,
machine
pama é
sun
abo e
Kai abalés
R
VI
108-109.
As you
can see
i8
In hese many
i
o he examples,
me apho is a
way o
ha monizing he
signal o
con en
impo ance,
exp essing he
s eng h o
he idea in a
jy
dec easing
o de o he
a
money.
A good
po ion
J.
The me apho o
he whi e man has
he unc ion o
cha ac e izing
he pe son,
desc ibing he
in e nal
cha ac e is ics
o he iSo é.
i
Pyz. :
Some o
he nigh
as blue, so
i was
da k.
i
R
V
233.
The old is
no longe
good, he
ace is
clean
—
The g ound,
lime whi e,
blackened
in he cu .
RV
115.
Juza
hasn'
spoken
o a long
ime.
R
VI
106.
As ali e as a
p as o éejo
in on o
my eyes
[Vinci iné]
all hose
yea s
Kai abaléj.
Ten long
yea s,
a ia
hi es el
he same
bloodq
{
You,
neix aunama,
sii iausiu
swea
neiSplaunama...
R
VI
148.
Pe sonal
pe cep ions help
o cha ac e ize
synaes he ic
me apho s,
wo ds based on
di e en
senso y hemes,
and he use o
speech.
Jy
mos o en
consis s
o ,, isible<
odo s
(plg. :
,,...ai y
pelynq gailiq
i
i a,
kasendusiq
didziuléj
odkinés
opinéj,
galéjai
sugau i
nosimi)*
R V I saw
141,
audible
images
o he
i
’poji iy
kombinacijos’.
AiSku,
i 's no
igh o
say ha
all
J.
Bal us'
me apho s
a e e y
o iginal.
Some o
hem,
especial-
ly hose ela ed o
su
Zmoniy
daily li e
(no o
na u e)
elemen al
ep esen -
a ion, is a
con en ion-
al image y
app oach.
Jy
he
amewo k
image is
usually he
esul o he
ju
use o
popula
me apho iz-
a ion
pos ula es,
o en wi h a
mo e
cons an
s e eo ypy backg ound.
T ue, in one case
ne
s e eo ypy
image is
ac i a ed,
»upda ed«, dél
unusual con ex
acqui es
sugges ions.
Recall he
al eady
gi en
example o
me a a y
s e eo ypes
—
,,Zaibai
akyse“,,,Z-
emé
siiiba o
po
kojom“,,,-
nak is
uzk iu o“-
,,,nuémé
Zaibus“.
They a e
igge ed
by an
unusual
i
si ua ion
con ex , an
elemen o
hype bole.
The w i e
does no
shy away
om
e e ing
o olk
symbolism, con en ional image y and seman ics.
Such a me hod
o
me apho iza i-
on can be
desc ibed in
e ms o
This s a egic
posi ion: I use
he mo e
jo
uni e sal ways
o olk
me apho iza ion
o di e en
exp ession,
i
because he e
a e he mos
o iginal means o
cla i y, he
means o
sugges ion o
condensa ion o
hough .
i
These
means
co espo-
nd o he
w i e 's
way o
ep esen -
ing he
objec s in
pa icula ,
his way o
isual hinking.
Jus a
ew
examples:
»lki au umn
lay down
Aleksiukas,
un il
uzZlopé cu
R
1
235.
Laukians
¥élo
RI
255.
I
ma é: no
longe his
own
(Juza)
cia, a
i e
ha has been di e ed
R
VI
38.
Don' say
ha lo e
was bu ning
e y ho ,
bu dél o
o é
i
neix o eé
o
gaileséio:
i
i
No mo e
clampdowns..."
R
VI
39.
Such a
me apho is
based on
—
con en ional
isual
i
images.
Bu he
jy
connec ion, he
con ex ual
in e p e a ion
s ill e lec s a
ce ain
in e p e a ion
o he concep
o he wo ld,
which in many
places shows
he adi ion o
i
he
“spi i ualiza io-
n” o e e yday
li e, cul u e,
i
meaning he
uni e se in a
di e en way
han in eali y.
jy
I
Yes, i.e.
By combining
s e eo ypes,
con en ional
means o
exp ession wi h
o iginal ones,
he w i e
su
c ea es a a
om
s e eo ypical,
non-s anda d
ne
e ec . As you
know, adi-
73:

he
uncon olled
use o
means o
exp ession
can
s eng hen
he ine ia
o hough .
I s au ho a oids
he use o
s e eo ypical
isual bases, e y
subjec i ely
composing hem
in o an a is ic
whole.
j
Be
he ine ia o
hough
sugges s mo e
me apho iza io-
n, me onimic
ne
exp essions.
o
Pasak
Ziomeko,
me apho
is sough
» o eclassi y
he al eady
known wo ld*,
me onymy being
o
a ce ain
cul u al
ex u e.
u
Fo i s
ans e -
ed
seman ics
su
is limi ed
i
by he
p ecise
conno a i-
i
on aken
by he pa adigm.
Todél me onymie
bý i mnohem
konze a i nější!®,
Al eady long ago
jsigaléjes he
posi ion ha
me apho de elops
in poe y,
me onymie in p ose.
o
—
J.
In Bal uSio’s
poems he
me onymy
o hough
p e ails,
hus he
seman ic
i
igu e o
me onymy.
Su
i s adi ional
conse a ism
can be linked o
i
g ea e dange s
o he ine ia o
he w i e 's
hough .
Bu he
igu e
i sel can
be
no hing.
i
I 's
impo an
how i 's
used.
In gene al, in
me apho ic-
al sense,
he ho izon
o
associa ions
J.
In he wo ks o
Bal us i is
pa icula ly high
whe e plas ics,
s e eoscopics,
explici ly depic he
eali ies o na u e,
whe e hey a e
pe soni ied,
“spi i ualized”,
Me apho s,
especially he
plEs inÉs ones,
inc edibly ac i a e
con ex ual
seman ics.
P ocess-
es ela ed
su
o he a-
S a egic
posi ions.
Less he
w i e
c ea es
o iginal
me apho-
s whe e
he depic s
People's
li es,
pe sonali-
ies o li e.
The w i e
elies
hea ily on
i
con en ion-
al
me apho ic-
al image
seman ics,
symbolism
o olk
o igin.
The adi ional
associa i ene-
ss o meaning in
such means is
ac i a ed,
seman ics is
wa likely
expanded.
jy
CTPATETHA
META®OPH3ALLHN
B
NPOHM3BEQEHHAX
10.
BAJITYUIMCA
Pes ome c a se
B
paccma papae csa
camoOsiTHocTB Me adopu3alMH
mpouspenennax
B
TO,
Bam yu-
maca.
B
acnex e
COMMyHuKaTHBHOM
c paTe un asToPa
Me adopsl,
ocobeHHO
pa3nepHyTs e
HEOOETIHO
MHTeHCHbuyMpyIOT
cemaHTHuecKHe
Mpoueccsl
—
ycwIMBaloT
WIM
MeHSIOT
TOHamb-
HOcTS
(HHO qa
Kom)
noBecTeonanus,
AKTYANM3MPYIOT
CHMBONIMYECKHe
CMBICNbI
HM
accolmanna
HapOTHBIX
HOMMHalMi
ABeHMi,
sBiaIoTCA
CPEACTBOM
TapMOHH3alMM
cH HanoB
,,BaxKHOCTH
comepxKaHAs
H
Cpe cTB
en y
BEIpaxenua.
Tlocpexc Bom
Me adop
pucyioTca
spKne
muquennyama-
SMPOBaHHBIe
peaimu
mpuponei.
Bonnomad
cnoHTaHHo
Bo3HnKIee
BieyaTuieHHe,
MeTadopa
yac-
TO
ABIMCTCA
KOHTeHCalMel
XapakTepHcTHKH
KaKOTO-H60
ABICHHA,
PakTa
H
e o
CHTYaIMORHOTO
BOCIIpHATHA.
Type
u306paxenun
Gi a
mone
MMCATeIb
TBOPYECKH
MCHONb3YeT
H
pa3BuBaeT
ceMaHTHKy
KOHBCHUMOHAJIbHEIX
MeTahopH¥ecKHxX
H
CHMBONMYECKHX
O6pazoB.
10
Z .
i
plg.
Ziomek
J.
Me apho
a
me onimia.
—
Memo ial
Li e acki,
1984,
XXV,
z°
1,
p. 206.