scieee Science in your language
[lt] (orig) [en] [de] [fr] [it] [es] [pt]

Lietuviški įrašai viename „Knygos nobažnystės“ egzemplioriuje

Read accessible full text
Machine-translated document

This is a machine-generated translation of the original document and may contain errors, omissions, or changes in meaning. Do not rely on this translation for quotations, citations, or authoritative references. Please consult and cite the original document.

Lietuviški įrašai viename „Knygos nobažnystės“ egzemplioriuje

Author: Zigmas Zinkevičius
Year: 1994
Source: https://journals.lki.lt/actalinguisticalithuanica/article/download/1474/1568
LIETUVIY
KALBOTYROS
QUESTION-
S, XXXIV
(1994)
LIETUVIY
LANGUAGES
TARMES
IR
JU
STUDIES
Is
a chi es
F om
a chi es
M
Zigmas ZINKEVICIUS
LITHUANIAN
TRACES
VIENAME
»BOOKS
NOBAZNYSTES’
IN THE EXAMPLE
Vilniaus
Ma yno
Maz ydo
lib a y
”
"Books"
(PDF).
(1653
in he copy,
wi h a
signa u e, is a
A
1/653,
wo-page
p aye ex
w i en in
ka
Li huanian.
Jj
I ha e
b ie ly
men ioned
my
Volume o
he
His o y o
IV
Li huanian Language
!.
Anyway, i
was no
discussed in
he in e iew
mo e b oadly.
P o ided,
pho ocopy
pe ho nas
jo
i
?:
5)
Mol:
V.
nw
BE
Ne ds, hn
in auke h-
ibie a i y
o an un
AO
eenies,
Fn onemius
ca ed i e.
name,
la y s name
in
oe
ei
PBIB: dis
Lh wie, Clunas
umiinisdinachas
ed
LR ie,
hey we e.
Ice, eg
ye
La ge.
I'm su e
you' e
hinking
o he
seabed
dead
meese a ed,
w
c
null pe
es ,
LOwe/iog
San es,
h, hes.
Ln
WMa ios
Ame, isi
ehind
wa
mase ua
ay
elnihel
s
eyhicys.
Thick
Choani e au
m u a
b umgues
iden i ooes
OWN &
cong
beDamii
eyp cli
alice
ge aQey
wey
Taa e
ulo hi de ey myeWehe
wenn dukuchumem, G es
gdh, Shwe anigy eliohis
,
e
Show he
main
ce
window
,
98Y
Tembe mume
Goons
pa iss
Tue,
KeFo e:L emuem
i e, Waleleii
hp
&
ole o ,
agami gju
i
Tanp inihes
:
oes
Ya names
BA
does”
Gligeoe/ie.
L
|
Qawke
ie
ia
s
Z.
His o y
o he
Li huani-
an language, IV:
Lie u iy
in o he languages
XVIII-XIX
a.
Vilnius:
Science,
1990,
p.
186—187.
Del
echniniy
spaudos
ki eiy
ins ead
o aidés
z
su
ans e se
Roo s p essing
cab
166
1
5
10
15
gn
:
Ox
LL
Ly
hou Ad en ou é
A
P ie
ce
ke awe
we
Agams o ac.
muse,
A
eynbe:
anus,
dekdi oa-
me
uco ie -
dieey, og
‘un a
wang 7L-
ga:
cnaekn he
auhaz h
bes Du n
qu eyikes
a ei
,
i
u
mumes
wesig eh
ey, eC ps:
cMa eysi
kuna b ain
u
TIE
A
nucdel
nike
y
ne
cle
awey,
a es
Ba
one
po
Se, we,
ea i in
aeg in
cane
a he
77
cbuiwe,
be elel
TULdU,
dan
munw
u
ose e a ,’
‘gi mu e
&
g aug es
eo enicy
pale im ley
‘ den
Mud ad
sesued
awd ez
he y
ae
Ba
ne
Ya e o
aphecmia,'
ad
ce b ulb ele.,
cla,
e
e
pe
: d
“ih a
pub e,
alibes
[ ho e,
i
inike a
ia han,
Mi
ebies,
D ei. Pe.
5 sigs ae
SS yibe
T en, Ha,
dan
e d
lgaigee
adel Yl
|
Byw gioi
ga chank
a
en
Ne
I
God o
he sun
and he
moon, he
god o
he ain,
he god
o he
wind, he
god o
he sea,
he god
o he
wa e .
We
wo ship,
p aise,
and
p aise
he g ea
God, he
Son o
God, he
Lady o
God,
Jesus
Ch is ,
and he
Th one
o God,
who came
in he
win e
o us,
and who
came o
us
h ough
he
sp ing o
he Holy
Spi i ,
and om
he bi h
o he
Vi gin
Ma y, and
who will
come
again and
will sa e
us om
ou sins.
Gi e me
he li e
o he
dead, i
we a e
g a e ul
o you
g ea
igh eou-
sness,
you
hea el
me cy,
you lo e,
you ue
se ice,
you
gene ous
kindness,
you lo e
o us
and you
dea h o
ou loss;
Who is
he Lo d,
he Head,
he
Shephe -
d, he
Waldon,
he
P o ec -
o , he
Media o
and he
Concilia -
o , he
uncondi i-
onal
se an
o he
pe ec ,
u Tewu
Jawa and
u
Dwa ia.
"S'gu un
uméiu
paga bin-
u. Amen.
167
II
1 M . Iezau
X**®
Jzgani oi-
au us. 10
And he
pe ec
wisdom o
ou God,
which we
ha e
denied o
hea , iog
un ha
wa ging
Holy One
i z he
highes o
hea ens o
come, and
u us o
mee , she5
kieys:
S andeysi
kuna and
blood o
ou
sinne s,
no o
awes,
because
sheeey had
honou
wi h Tewg
[awa
be o e he
beginning
o he
wo ld, bu
o us, i
we we e in
he coming
wa s o
he wo ld,
sheeey
would help
us, 11 i
sheeey
would help
us who
we e los ,
and i
sheeey
would call
us o he
igh eous-
ness.
P a zome
Tawe pe
a eimg
awa un
Swie a,
da ik mus
nuodelnik-
ejs
Ma onies
i
b ungiausi
nuopelnai
Jawa;
Jzganik us
nuog
g eek,
wi a
ang y,
galibes
15
[zie ona,
i
umiina
pa kandi-
nima. O
G ea
Fa he ,
in he
name o
he God
o he
Co enan-
, Lo d
Jesus,
apding us
o he
Goddess,
i you
wan o
keep
you
co enan-
, he
Kingdom
o God
will gi e
you
powe
and glo y. Amen
*A copy o he
book
“nobaZnys é-
su
s” in p aye
o ms
{
Maz ydo
lib a y
en e ed
ig
Vilnius E angelical
Re o med Synod.
This is
shown
e en by
se e al
synod
seals
i
j aga on
he second
side o he
i le page
(o he
hand):
Bibl.
Synodi
E ang.-Re o m.
Viln.
Ca .
I.
D.
N2.777.q.
On he
same
page, i
seems,
ano he
hand
polekigkai
j aSy a:
Od
Ksigd/z]a
Kielme iskiego
Zbo u
Cons an
Thumasa.
1880
.
15
o he day
Ma ca
Kelmy.
So
Vilnius
Synod
book
1880m.
o Ma ch
15
d.
ecei ed
iS
Kelmés
e o ma y
kunigo
Kons an ino
Tumo
(Tumaso?
1877—1903
3).
Bo h
p aye
ex s a e
w i en
a he end
o he
book,
oge he
on blank
pages.
The specimen
has mo e
i
han uséiy
pages:
be o e’
p in ed ex
is nine
Jy
(in he
second hal
o he i s
page
some hing is
w i en, i
seems like a
agmen o
he con en ,
bu in he
o he
language he
same pe son
i
w o e he
ne
p aye ;
he e is
mo e small
w i ing, bu
in Polish),
e en blank
pages o
i
p in ed
ex .
po
—
39
The
p aye s
a e ound
po
in he i s
wo pages
o he
p in ed ex .
Bo h
p aye s
asé one
pe son.
They a e
co e ed
wi h black,
now aded
ho n.
The ex
is qui e
old, p.g.
inden
J,
[s
(=
3)
(=
§),
ey, (=ei,
uy
ui).
"Rady y
y y
auks aiziy
a me".
Na ional
an
syllabic ype
compounds
na owed, e.g.
un
I
1,
2,
6,
20,
II 3, ‘an ’,
19
b ungus
I
10
‘b angus’,
g.
sg.
.
he wo s
II
13
‘ he mos
expensi e’, Dunguiei zkos
I]
3—4
‘dangiskos’;
umzin
I
4
‘amainas’,
g.
sg.
m.
ence
I
4,
II
15,
16
‘amZino’,
g.
pl.
umziu
I
20,
II
19
‘amiZiy’;
giwin
II
19
‘li ing’,
2.
sg.
impe .
apding
3
G uzewski
B.
Koscidl
E angelical Re o med
w
Kielmach.
Wa saw, Poland
1912,
p.
421.
168
The 17
‘apdenk’. Tags:
idan I 10, II 8, 10,
18, g. sg. m.
pa kandinima II
15-16
‘paskandinimo-
’. The endings ¢,
¢ and -a, -e, <
*-g, *-¢.ne i e
-y, -j
espec i ely
-u, -i, e.g. a. sg.
ga bg II 6
‘ga be’, Tewg Il
6—7 ‘ e e’,
Sp owg I 7
‘dalyka,
eikala’, n. sg.
m. gimes I 8
‘gimes’; i. s.
17–18, 19–20,
21–22, 23–24,
25–26, 27–28,
29–30, 31–32,
33–34, 35–36,
37–38, 39–40,
40–41, 42–43,
44–45, 46–47,
48–49, 50–51,
52–53, 54–55,
56–57, 58–59,
60–61, 62–63,
64–65, 66–67,
68–69, 70–71,
72–73, 74–75,
76–77, 78–79,
80–81, 82–83.
Ziwa e I 15
‘li e’. This
o ien s us o
he na ow
eas e n
Li huanian
a eas be ween
Pas alys and
Vasky. Such a
decision is no
suppo ed by
S a auja, bu
by jj, he ha d
/be o e e ype
ocalism (a),
he p esence
o he
non-in e laced
inal -a < *-a
ins ead o he
common
language -o and
he long owel
@ in he
ki éia ed
monosyllabic
zodizes Salia
wi hou he
in e laced inal
-as (b), as well
as he
assimila ion o
he s ong-end
diph hong
demeny and
he
symboliza ion
o he le e
ey (c), e.g. : (a) 2.
sg. cond.
gale umey II 11
‘ u gale um’, 1.
pl. mi e umim I
12 ‘mes
myle ume’; (b)
g. sg. m. kuna Il
5 ‘kino’, G eek
II 14
‘nuodémés’,
wi a pik a II 15
‘all e il’, wa ga
I 8 ‘ha m’ and
a II 3 ‘ o’, bu
. b ungiausios
II 13 ‘ he mos
expensi e’; c)
pa sey I 16
‘pa sy’, ik ey
I 13 ‘ uly’,
duk ingey I
15—16 ‘dickingly,
wi h hope’, i. pl.
m.
nuodelnikejs II
13
‘pa icipan s’,
n. pl. m.
paskey z i II 18
‘ o ead,
o suppo ’.
Bu plg. a.
pl. mums
II 11, 14
‘mus’.
In he
ex
he e
a e
a chaic
o ms,
which
a e no
longe
used in
he
s a e
and in
gene al in
Li huani-
a, e.g., d.
pl.
Zmonem-
us I 2
‘zmoné-
ms’, all.
s.g.
paku osp
II 11, ad.
s.g. 12–13,
pp. 12–13,
pp. 13–14.
.
Danguiei-
{zkos II
4, 2. sg.
cond.
pade um-
bey II 9, 1.
pl.
ga e um-
bim II 19.
I da es
om he
16 h–17 h
cen u ie-
s. Abo e
he ex
o he
i s
p aye is
he
Polish
an as é
(see
pho oco-
py), which
should
ead as
ollows:
Modl(i w-
a) V na
B(oz)e
Na odze-
nie. So
his
p aye
has a
i h
(Roman)
numbe .
The 5 h
p aye in
he
“Book o
P aye s”
is a
comple -
ely
di e e-
n
p aye ,
so he
p aye is
no
ansla -
ed in o
he
Eas e n
dialec o
he
Uppe
Ta as.
Such a
p aye ,
which
co esp-
onds o
he
o iginal
ex , is
no
ound in
he Book
o
Nobazny-
s és. Bu
he mos
in e es -
ing hing
abou
his copy
is he
new
hand-w i-
en
numbe s,
among
which is
he 5 h.
Appa en-
ly, he
ex was
aken
om
ano he
collec i-
on o
p aye s,
he
con en s
o which
a e
numbe e-
d. A e
checking
he
la ge
collec io-
ns o
p aye s
published
in 1781
and 1845
by he
E angeli-
cal-Re o-
med
chu che-
s, he 5 h
p aye
was
ound,
he same
one ha
was
eques -
ed in he
“Book o
nobazny-
s es”.
The
spelling is
simila :
{(= s)
aidé,
ins ead
o {3 (= 8)
ia B,
ins ead
o 2 —3;
he
diph hon-
gs ay, ey,
uy a e in
he 1781
edi ion,
and in
1845 hey
we e
w i en
aj, ej uj.
The 1781
edi ion
con ains
he
e bal
o ms
wi h -b,
and he
1845
collec i-
on
con ains
mile umi-
m,
duk e u-
mim,
a nau -
umim. The
language
is ypical
o he
middle
a ian
o he
miisy
senyjy
a3 y
language,
so in his
edi ion
he ex
is
w i en
as an ,
b angus,
am3inas,
am3iy,
ik ay
and so on.
No
e e ywh-
e e in he
Wo d,
he e
a e
changes
in he
ex , he
mos
impo a-
n o
which
a e:
4 P aye s
o he
bap ised,
Wi Jokioy
Reykmey
p igulinczi-
os...Ka ala-
uc3uje...
MDCCLXX-
XI (=1781).
Used
Vilnius
Uni e si y
Lib a y
copy sign.
Ly 965. In
1845, he
Uni e si y
o Vilnius
copies
we e used.
LR 695. "
169
In he 1781
collec ion
(in he
1845
manusc i-
p : only
he chan
di e s):
§mone e
gia as
pamegum-
as
Zmonem-
us gie a
wala
Po e
mu u
JE3au
Ch y e
Ponie
Jezau
K is e
iuog i
o a
awo
Diewi iog
i z Sos a
ewi[zka
un
ziemibes
ka an
giamibes
giami kos
o wa ga
i bedas
Zmo iu
nuoi
wa ga
musu
nuodelnik-
eis
de niku
[ o is’
eykey i
J o is
eykieys
awimp’
ik ay
duk e u-
mbim
Tawimp
dukse u-
mim awe
wie nay
ekio um-
bim’,
Tawe
s opiey
ekio um-
im, Tawim
awimi
wienu
cZe e
Ziwa a
pacziu
Ziwa e
obu u ko
pe bulau-
siu The
second
p aye is
no ound
in he
e o med
collec io-
ns o
p aye s.
We
canno be
su e ha
he
au ho o
“Knygos
nobaznys-
és” used
hese
publica i-
ons.
P obably
he e
was some
o he
unlikely
collec ion
o
p aye s,
a possible
hing,
handw i -
en,
w i en in
he
eas e n
highland
dialec ,
om
which i is
d awn. As
he da a
below
shows,
his was
p obably
done in
he la e
18 h
cen u y
o he
i s hal
o he
19 h
cen u y.
Exis ing
a chaic
o ms,
no
espec -
ul o he
language
o he
ime,
could
ha e been
simply
ew i -
en om
an olde
collec ion.
Among
hem, he
Uni e si-
y
Lib a y
o
Wa saw
holds
Kelmés_ -
e o ma y
XVII—XIXa.
The same
handw i -
ing was
ound on
he
se mon.
The whole
ex 's
s uc u-
e and
language
( a mé) is
he same
as ou
common
p aye . In
Gia, he
le e s ,
s (= 5), z
(= 8), ey,
uy (= ei, ui)
a e used.
The
na owed
o ms o
an- ype
syllable
compoun-
ds, e.g.
un ‘an ’,
a. sg.
Dungu
‘dangy’,
ad .
p ide un-
cziey
‘app op -
ia ely’,
[3indien
‘ oday’,
bu dan .
The inals
g, ¢ and -a,
-e < *-@,
*-é a e
no
eplaced
by -y, j o
-u, -i, e.g. a.
sg. galwg,
p ie z
Sos g,
ape
a pi kimg,
su mey g
‘su meile’,
1. sg.
ziwa e
‘li e’.
Ha d #
be o e a
ype o
ocalism:
Jekle
‘sc a ch’
(impo a-
n o
Nau uan--
Ry y
AukS ai¢i-
ams!),
meyle
‘sc a ch-
’, Guleja
‘sc a ch-
’, 1. pl.
cond.
ga e um-
im
‘galé um-
e’. The
dis ibu -
ion o he
owels @
and o is
he same
in he
gi en
o ms, c .
g. sg. m.
Diewa
‘God’,
[wie a
‘wo ld’,
on zienkla
‘on he
sign’ and
a ‘ ha ’,
ja ‘his’
Salia
iniinés
-ios. See
also he
p onunci-
a ion o
he
i agal-
io ai:
ku sey
‘cou ses-
’, sz ey
‘ ha ’,
dayk ey
‘ hings’,
su
wi ikleys
‘wi h
diape s’,
Labey
‘ e y’...
m.
ku iamuy
‘ku iam’,
ad. s.g.
Diewiep,
all. s.g.
1999. pp.
10.
"Musump,
n pl. m.".
Danguiei{-
zki
‘dangi8s-
ki’, 1. pl.
Dunguiei{-
zkose, e
e
‘ ebenie’,
ad .
Tod in
‘ odél’,
nesang
‘nes’…
The e is
no doub
ha he
w i e o
he
Wa saw
ex is
he same
pe son
who
w o e
bo h
p aye s
in he
“Book o
he
Laws”.
Who was
he
pe son, i
was no
possible
o
de e min-
e. Among
he
au ho s
o he
a su is-
kiy
Kelmes
e o ma-
y
collec ion
is
Alexande
Moeiulsky.
This is
p obably
wha he
au ho o
he
a icle
d ew he
a en ion
o he
his o ian
Inge
LukSai e.
She ga e
us he
own
p in s
and
mic o ilm-
s. Jai
Si ding,
yeah! 8
This was
con i m-
ed by he
LTSR
Cou
Expe ise
Resea ch
Ins i u e
in i s
No ice No.
11—1280 o
16.10.1981.
Esan¢éio
inkin Je,
called
“Zbié
kazan poe
i lie u ių
iš me ų
1742— 1812
i
neda ų”,
old
signa u e
1148, new
—1268.
170

zinomas
e angeliky- e o ma y
leidiniy publishe
Aleksand as
Rapolas
Moeiulsk-
is
(1790—
1866),
gimes
He
i
wo ked
he e
o a
while.
I was
inclined o
hink ha
he ex
p obably
belongs o
he bi en
hand
jo
°.
Ta¢iau
Paweł
Wojcik, a
s uden a
he
Uni e si y o Wa saw,
1992/1993
m.
m.
s aZa e is
Vilnius
Uni e si y, a
my eques ,
checked he
Wa saw
collec ion and
ound no da a
con i ming
his opinion.
i
°.
The
collec i-
on
con ains
eks y, asy y
Alexande
i
Adomo
(mos likely
Adomo
Jok bo,
1749—1832)
Moéiulskiy,
also
Alexande
MeSkausko
(Mieszkowski),
so all he
jy
w i ing is
di e en
om us ough
a Su iskio
(including’
The book
nobagnys és”
j asy y
maldy) ex .
Anyway,
a
*Knygos
nobaznys és”
p aye will be
j aSes
pe son,
wo king
Kelméje
ben
a
susijes
su
Kelmés
E angelical
Re o med
Chu ch.
The
p ies s
o ha
communi-
y we e
o en
b ough
is
Bi zy o
wen o
wo k
i
Bi zus
(bo h
loca ions
ha e
wo ked
o men ion
Aleksand as
Rapolas
i
Adam
Jok ibas
Moéiulskiai),
so ex
y y
auks aigiy
Bi zy
k as o
a me
a p
Kelmes
e o ma y
ank aS¢iy
neu é y
miisy
s ebin i.
Bi zy
k as o
a me
In he ea ly
a.
19 h
cen u y,
he
Re o me s
used i o
publish
eligious
con en .
I shows
bo h
Mykolo
Ce askio
!°,
bo n
abou
1754
m.
mos likely
Nemunelio
In Rad iliškis,
om
1784
m.
be o e
dea h)
(1824
di busio
Bi zuose,
book
publishing, published
1803
m.
Sample:
”Kozonis
padeka oné-
s”
i
The Old
Ca echism.
The basis o
he i s
bookle is he
dialec ha
we know
(wi h
adi ional
aS y
p e ixes o
he ime), e.g.,
wundeni
‘ andenyje’,
[zwin i
‘s en i’,
ka
‘ko’, ‘ o’,
a
weykey
‘child en’,
ze linksmus
paukszeziey
‘ ie
linksmi
pauké iai’
(li iksmiis).I8
he essence
o he same
language
w i en in
he second
i
bookle
jZanga, bu
po e iy
o he
ca echism
i
subjec s in
i
adi ional,
con inuing
middle
XVI-
XVII
a.
as y
kalbos—
a ian a.
M.
Maz ydo
lib a y
con ains
books o an
unknown
au ho
”Bud
abou
dinne
M .
Mouse.
Oh, Jesus.
Ch is uso”
(unda ed)
xe ox copy o
he ex in
he same
dialec as
M.
Ce askio,
e.g.
wundo
‘ anduo’,
pinkiu
‘penkiy’,
ku
‘ka’,
s alu
‘s ala’,
songs
‘giesme’,
a
‘ o’,
p as us
‘p as i’
(p aise),
ejki
‘mus ’.
Rasé
ne
M.
Ce askis
(di e en
spelling),
bu
ano he
pe son.
I
i is ull o
a chaisms,
e.g.,
nesang
'nes',
be aig
‘be ’,
kiekwienamuy
‘e e yone’, i
we had
‘kad
u é ume’.
Juozas
Tumelis
In Vilnius
has a
se mon
i
giesmiy
ibe
( ecei ed
1968
m.
is
Leono
Gudai io),
which is
j
one
collec ion
1925-1940
m.
he
pain e o sudéjo
Kazys
Simonis,
buying
hose a ms
In Bi zai,
iS
he
elde s o ed
S ei eno
(S ei ono?).
I 's long,
page-long
284
XVIII-
The 19 h
a.
Re o med
Tex s
Collec ion.
Oldes
da ed
ex
is
1726
m.
Maybe i 's
e en olde .
Rage
pe sons
unknown,
excep
1813
m.
ex
au o ly
al eady
—
men ion-
ed
M.
Ce aski.
Many o
he
ex s in
his
collec i-
on a e w i en in adi ional
8
Zinke iéius
Z.
His o y
o he
Li huani-
an language, IV,
p.
187.
:
2
Reiskiu
P.
Wojcik
was gi en
uz
h ee
housand
i
copies o
he
addi ional
ex s.
‘
o
Real_su name is
assumed o
ha e been
Vaskys,
p o é iy
ié e s a
j
la yniska
Ce askj,
o
ou
bibliog aph-
is
e s hey
we e made
Ce auska.
171
as y
language,
bu wi h
e y
abundan
elemen s
o he
eas e n
highland
dialec .
The e a e
some
cha ac e-
is ics
(also in
some o
he oldes
ex s)
ha guide
us in he
Na ow
pa o
he Mi%a
i e ,
especially
in he
Bi zy
a ea, e.g.,
ja ‘his’, a
‘ ha ’,
ejki
‘need’,
pawe éi
‘ u ns’,
sekle
‘seek’,
umpus
‘sho ’ (=
sho ),
ki as asz
i a ‘I am
ano he ’.
The e a e
nume ous
ancien
w i en
examples
o he
language,
e.g.,
nopikon -
oy ‘in
ha ed’,
dewin am
liekam
paguldime
‘in he
nine een-
h
chap e ’,
/zwe am-
uy ‘ o he
holy’,
kunigamus
‘ o he
p ies s’,
poniep,
mu impi,
dangueie -
zkas
‘hea enly’,
ninnaim
‘ o be’.
Appa en l-
y, a leas
some o
hese
ex s
we e
aken
om hei
ancien
manusc i-
p s o
om
p in ed
publica io-
ns
unknown
o us. In
1948 in
Kaunas,
when I was
b owsing
he copies
o
Mo kiino's
Re o med
Pos il in
he
Vy au as
Magnus
Uni e si y
Lib a y, I
no iced a
s ange
de achme-
n : he
back was
co e ed
wi h
agmen-
s o an
old
Li huanian
handw i i-
ng. The
language
o his
ex
esembles
he
eas e n
a ian o
Russian. I
w o e
down he
ollowing
wo ds:
umzi‘amZ-
iy’, baysas
‘ e ible’,
eyp ‘yes’,
kayp
‘how’, niey
‘no’.
Un o un-
a ely, i is
no longe
possible o
in es iga-
e he
language
o his
manusc i-
p : he
copy has
been
es o ed
and is now
in he
lib a y o
Vilnius
Uni e si y
(new
signa u e
Lp 1620),
while he
o iginal
manusc i-
p is no
longe
a ailable.
As we
know, in
he G and
Duchy o
Li huania
in he
16 h—17 h
cen u ies
books
we e
published
in wo
a ian s
o he
w i en
language:
he
so-called
middle
a ian
(which
o igina ed
in he
dialec o
he
cen al
Li huanian
plains a
ha ime —
he
Kedainiy
K as o
dialec )
and he
eas e n
a ian
(o igina -
ed in he
dialec o
Vilnius and
i s nea by
su oundi-
ngs).
Ca holic
books
we e
pe mi ed
in bo h
e sions:
he i s
was o
he
Zemgaly
diocese,
he
second
o he
needs o
he Vilnius
diocese.
Bu he
Re o me-
s
published
books only
in he
middle
e sion.
The e is
no only
no a
single
book, bu
e en a
manusc i-
p o he
Re o med
ex ,
w i en in
he
eas e n
w i en
language
o he
16 h—17 h
cen u ies.
This
ci cums -
ance is
qui e
su p ising,
because
e o med
(cal inis )
people o
ai h we e
hen no
only in he
eas e n
and
cen al
(Zemaiciy
dis ic ),
bu also in
eas e n
Li huania,
Vilnius and
Uzne io 1!
(Bi zai,
Pane ezy-
s,
Naujamie-
s is,
Papilys,
Ukme gé,
U ena,
Za asai...)
dis ic s.
All he
da a
p esen ed
in his
a icle
compel us
o e ise
a leas in
pa he
obse a i-
on ha
he
Re o med
Chu ch
used only
he middle
w i en
e sion o
he
language.
Appa en l-
y, hey
asé and
eas e n,
bu he
w o e a
book was
no
p in ed o
p in ed did
no
su i e.
Appa en l-
y, i was
no
wi hou
eason
ha in he
i s hal
o he
19 h
cen u y,
he
eache
o he
Bi žai
e o med
school
Kazimie -
as
K is upas
Daukėa
(bo n
abou 1795,
died 1865)
in his
handw i -
en
Li huanian
g amma
( he i s
g amma
w i en in
Li huania-
n!), ”Sho
alk abou
he
Li huanian
language”
based on
he
eas e n
Uppe
Aukš ai i-
jos
dialec , by
he way,
mos ly
spoken in
he Bi žai
egion (he
himsel
came om
he e). He
c ea ed
his own
common
w i en
language in
he
eas e n
Uppe
Saxony 1 I
was also
used by
Kazimie -
as
K is upas
sūnus, who
modi ied
and
simpli ied
i .
Edwa d
Jacob
Daukia
(1836 —
abou
1890).
Appa en-
ly, he
eas e n
Li wa
Zawilejs-
ka was
s ill
called up
be o e§
1860, bu
disappea-
ed om
Bi zy
e o m-
ed p ies
Ka olis
e c.
Abou
he e m
and a ea
z .
Woj ko-
wiak Z.
Za ilejs-
ka
Li huania
in he
15 h and
i s hal
o he
16 h
cen u y,
Poznan,
1980. 12
Plagiau
g .
Zinke iéi-
us Z.
His o y
o
Li huani-
an
Languag-
e, [V,
Vilnius,
1990, p.
190—192.
172
(ieee
ho
Ne lich's
(1808
—
1860)
G amma .
Thus, he
eas e n
highland
dialec has
played a a
g ea e ole
in he
e o med
a ional han
he usual
manonia.
LITHUANIAN
INSCRIPTIONS
IN
A
COPY
OF
‘'THE BOOK
NOBAZNYSTES’
Summa y
The a icle
analyses he
handw i en
ex wo
p aye s
ound
o
in
a
copy
o
”
Book
nobaznys és”
kep he
in
M.
Maz ydas
Lib a y
in
Vilnius.
I
was
es ablished
ha he
insc ip ion
had been
made
by
an
e angelis
e o mis
p ies ,
a
na i e he
o
dis ic
o
Bi zai,
who
wo ked
in
Kelmé.
Tex s
w i en he
by
same pe son
can ound
he
collec ion
be
manusc ip s
in
he
e o mis s
o
o
o
Kelme,
a
he
lib a y
o
Wa saw
Uni e si y.
These
ex s
a e
supposed
o
ha e
been
copied
ou some
o
old
p aye
book
ei he
he end
o
he
o
18 h he
o
begining
he
o
19 h
cen u y.
This ex
w i en
is
he
in
Eas
High
Li huanian
dialec .
The linguis
peculia i ies
he
o
Bi zai
egion
can be
be
seen
easily.
The ac s
p esen ed
show ha
he
Eas
High
Li huanian
dialec
played
a
much mo e
impo an
ole he
w i ings
in
he
e o mis s
o
han was
supposed
be o e.
i
KETURI
K.
BUGOS
LETTER
TOREI
TORBIORNSSONUI
1992
m.
geguzés-bi Zelio
ménesj di bau
sla is o bal is o
i
T.
To bjö ns-
son Lib a y
and
A chi es
*,
Uni e si y
o Lund
(Sweden)
Depa men
o Sla ic
S udies.
I me my ex
he e
su
Geo ge, a
$gios
depa me-
n
employee.
A young
man who
in one
in e i-
ew said
he had
w i en
ou
K.
Biigos
laiškus
T.
To bjö nsson
—
was going o
publish hem.
Laisky usy
language
o iginals
oge he wi h
o he
co espondence
su
handw i en in
which ime we e
i
p ese ed
T.
To bjö nsson-
's a chi es.
G.
Many le e s
w i en in a
change, by
placing
diac i ical
ma ks, will
mo e
unde lines.
Unwan ed
likes only
Ja is
(b), which
was no
p esen in
he sea ch
engine, some
ussian
i
wo ds in
La in
le e s
7.
No able o
comple e he
co ec ion
due o illness,
which soon
G.
Fa om
he bed.
When I
i8
wen o
he
hospi al,
i u ned
ou ha
he
o iginal le e s had disappea ed somewhe e.
(a e
ca e ul
inspec ion)
T.
To bjö nsson-
's a chi es a
Lund
Uni e si y
Lib a y
Rank as yno
ca alogue, I
couldn' ind
i
i ).
jy
As he
o iginals did
no appea ,
he le e s
i
emained
un inished
and
unpublished.
i
Al hough
he
le e s
we e no
ully
p epa ed
o
publica io-
n, hey
can be
us ed
(abou
one
ano he
doub ul
hing z .
Explana ions).
G.
Jaugelis
was
conside ed
one o he
bes
publishing
p oo eadi-
ng edi o s
o he
i
Sla is ics
Ins i u e,
be
he has
exempla ily
p epa ed a
numbe o
le e s o
Russian
w i e s
Fo Lund
Sla is s
(a .
Sla ica
Lundensia,
1973.
Vol.
1,
p.
115—140
;
1974.
Vol.
2,
p.
7—
116).
I wan o
hank you
G.
Pe mission
uz
o copy and
publish in he
Li huanian
i
p ess.
*
Abou
T.
To bjö nsson
Lib a y and
A chi es
Z .
S
undZia
B.
Li huanian s udies
Uni e si y
o Lund
//
Mo he
ongue,
1992,
No.
11.
P.
21—25.
Scien i ic
wo k in he
lib a y and
a chi e
The Swedish
Ins i u e
(S enska
Ins i u e )
inanced
Siau ées
Saliy
minis y
a yba
(No dic
Council
o
Minis e s),
he
a els
we e paid
o in
o eign
cu ency
by he Open Li huania Founda ion.
173