scieee Science in your language
[lt] (orig) [en] [de] [fr] [it] [es] [pt]

Danguolė Mikulėnienė. „Lietuvių tarmėtyra: genezė, raida ir paradigminiai lūžiai. I dalis. Ikitarmėtyrinis laikotarpis. Lietuvių tarmėtyros pradžia: tarmių skyrimas, tyrimų perspektyvų užuomazgos ir jų tipai“

Read accessible full text
Machine-translated document

This is a machine-generated translation of the original document and may contain errors, omissions, or changes in meaning. Do not rely on this translation for quotations, citations, or authoritative references. Please consult and cite the original document.

Danguolė Mikulėnienė. „Lietuvių tarmėtyra: genezė, raida ir paradigminiai lūžiai. I dalis. Ikitarmėtyrinis laikotarpis. Lietuvių tarmėtyros pradžia: tarmių skyrimas, tyrimų perspektyvų užuomazgos ir jų tipai“

Author: Vytautas Kardelis
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.35321/all82-12
Source: https://journals.lki.lt/actalinguisticalithuanica/article/download/1033/1407
202 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXII This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he wen ie h day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o he Eu opean Union.
VYTAUTAS KARDELIS
Vilniaus uni e si e as
Resea ch a eas: dialec ology, his o y o language,
cogni i e seman ics, a ia ion in language DOI: h ps:
doi.o g/10.35321/all82-12
Danguolė Mikulėnienė (Spanish p onuncia ion)
LITHUANIA TARMTYRA: This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he wen ie h day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o he Eu opean Union.
GENES, RAIDA and
The pa adigm shi .
This is DALIS I. I'm no going o lie o
you. I'm no going o lie o you. The
Commission shall be empowe ed o adop delega ed ac s in acco dance wi h A icle 26 o supplemen his Regula ion by laying down de ailed ules o he applica ion o his Regula ion.
TYV UŽUOMAZGOS AND i s ypes
Vilnius: Cen e o he Publishing o Science and
Encyclopedias, 2018, p. 319
This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he wen ie h day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o he Eu opean Union.
( i s olume)
Fo a long ime, he ba s o he his o y o he s udy o he Li huanian language
we e domina ed by he b igh and ou s anding igu e o P o esso Algi das
Sabaliauskas and his classic se ies o wo ks on he his o y o Li huanian
linguis ics "The his o y o he s udy o he Li huanian language" (Sabaliauskas
1979; 1982; 2012). Wi h all due espec o P o . A. Sabaliauskas and his wo k, i mus
be said and celeb a ed ha P o . Danguolė Mikulėnienė opened a new page in he
his o y o Li huanian linguis ics, dedica ed o he his o y o Li huanian
ansla ion. D. Mikulėnienė is he au ho o a ilogy o monog aphs, he i le o
which "Lie u os a mė y a: genezė, aida and pa adigma ic b eaks" indica es
ha in he h ee desc ip i e and c i ical discou ses (D. 1: "The in e im pe iod. The
beginning o Li huanian li e a u e: he classi ica ion o li e a u e, he p ospec s
o esea ch, and i s ypes. D. 2: "P egeolinguis ic and geolinguis ic pe iods o he
Li huanian language". Twen ie h-cen u y esea ch: ypes and di ec ions o esea ch. D. 3: The Neogeolinguis ic pe iod. a XXI Li huanian ansla o : mul i unc ional
Danguolė Mikulėnienė. Lie u ių a mė y a: genezė,
aida i pa adigminiai lūžiai. I dalis
Re iews o he Re iew 203 ansla ion model aims o e eal he ansla ion o Li huanian
as a scien i ic pa adigm o language a ia ion, he o ma ion and de elopmen o
Li huanian language (p. 9). In he wo ds o he au ho he sel , […]So his monog aphic
ilogy […] is he i s a emp o desc ibe mo e sys ema ically he o igins and
beginnings o Li huanian linguis ics, o encou age he sea ch o o go en da a and old
a chi al ma e ial o new pages o Li huanian linguis ics, i.e. o ind ou how he
scien i ic knowledge o egional a ie ies was o med, including in con empo a y
linguis ics[…] (p. 10). Bo h he i les o he ilogy o monog aphs and he pu pose o he
ilogy jus quo ed clea ly show ha D. Mikulėnienė ook a di e en pa h in w i ing he
his o y o linguis ics han he classic A. Sabaliauskas. To highligh he essen ial
di e ence be ween hese wo app oaches and s o y elling s a egies, I will no be
o iginal. The monog aph "Mani es ua ing Clay", published in 2017 by his colleague his o ian
Au elius Giedo, con ains he ollowing hough o P o esso Al edo Bumblausko a he
op o he galle y: "The his o y o his o iog aphy has long been abou who, when, wha
w o e. Au elius Gieda chose a di e en pa h: he w o e a book abou who, wha , and how
he hough . He was able o disco e Li huanian his o y and ell us hings we had ne e
seen be o e. The desc ip ion o his applica ion by P o . A. Bumblausko can be applied
almos o he whole dic iona y and o he book by P o . D. Mikulėnienė "Lie u ian
e minology: genesis, de elopmen and pa adigma ic b eakdowns". Pa one. The in e im
pe iod. The beginning o he Li huanian dic iona y: he classi ica ion o dic iona ies, he
p ospec s o esea ch, he o igins and ypes o dic iona ies […] […] I can ha dly desc ibe
and e eal he essence o he book mo e accu a ely. The e o e, in he wo ds o P o . A.
Bumblauska, I can say ha he his o y o Li huanian dialec ology (and linguis ics in
gene al) has long been abou who, when, wha w o e. P o . Danguolė Mikulėnienė chose
ano he pa h: she w o e a book abou who, wha and how she hough . She was able o
disco e he Li huanian dialec ology and ell us hings we had ne e seen be o e. Thus,
he ele ance and no el y o he i s pa o he monog aph ilogy canno be doub ed:
he essence o hese aspec s is s a ed in he quo ed quo e. The monog aph, edi ed by
D . Aud a I anauskienė, was published by he Publishing Cen e o Science and
Encyclopedias, illus a ed by he a is Al ons Ž ilius, p o essionally and me iculously
edi ed by Da ius Šimkūnas. The ex o he monog aph is complemen ed by 86 pain ings
(illus a ion and map blocks), so ca og aphe s Vigilija K ikščiūnienė, Ne inga
Ma ule ičiū ė-Tu lienė, Rima S ilienė, Lo e a Šu inienė, illus a ions o he p ess we e
p epa ed by Laima Gelčiū ė. The monog aph summa y was ansla ed in o English by D .
Anna Ruskan.
The monog aph consis s o P a a mė, which con ains no only he a ibu es
ypical o he p ose gen e, bu also p esen s he au ho 's o iginal app oach o
he de elopmen o p ose, one can say, he ex and analysis column o he
u u e monog aph. The au ho s dis inguish h ee s ages o Li huanian
dialec ology: 1) he beginning o ansla ion and p egeolinguis ic, 2) geolinguis ic,
3) neogeolinguis ic (p. 11), and h ee, in he au ho 's opinion, necessa y condi ions o Li huanian dialec ology, such as
VYTAUTAS KARDELIS
204 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXII au onomous linguis ic discipline, consis ing o :
[…]a map o he a ea o language a ian s unde conside a ion wi h clea
bounda ies […]...[…], […]a ques ionnai e p epa ed o he collec ion o e minology
[…]...[…] and […]a classi ica ion o he e minology o a pa icula language […]...[…] (p.
12). The in oduc ion, which names he pu pose and asks o he monog aph ( he key
wo ds o his chap e a e o c i ically e alua e, highligh and upda e, examine and
e alua e sys ema ically, e alua e om he poin o iew o in e na ionali y),
p esen s he me hods, highligh s he no el y, ele ance and signi icance o he
monog aph. The in oduc ion ends wi h a loud p esen a ion o he s uc u e o he
monog aph. The h ee- olume monog aph consis s o ou chap e s, which in u n
a e composed o chap e s and sec ions. The i s chap e discusses he
dis ibu ion o he Li huanian language a ea and ocuses on he in e lingual
nomencla u e o dialec s and he scena ios o language no maliza ion in old
g amma s. The second chap e is de o ed o he p ospec s o language a ia ion
esea ch in he 19 h cen u y ( he e a e analyses o he ips o A. Schleiche , A.
Bezzenbe ge , F. de Saussu e o Li huania; The Commission shall be empowe ed o
adop delega ed ac s in acco dance wi h A icle 26 o supplemen his Regula ion by
laying down de ailed ules o he applica ion o his Regula ion. he insigh s o A.
Schleiche , F. Ku šaičius, A. Bezzenbe ge , S. Mikucki, J. Juškos, J. Ka łowicz on he
speci ici ies o he e minology; he i s a emp s a classi ica ion o e ms in
he wo ks o S. Mikucki, A. Schleiche , F. Ku šaičius, J. Juškos, V. Po zeziński, M.
Akelaičius; A. Ba anausko and K. Young's classi ica ion) a e he main au ho s. The
hi d chap e deals wi h he p og amma ic p ojec s o he Li huanian ansla ion
o he end o he 19 h cen u y and he beginning o he 20 h cen u y (monog aphic
desc ip ions o he ansla ions: F. Fo una o o, A. Leskieno and K. B ugmanno, R.
Gau hio , K. Ju gelionio, K. he i s ques ionnai e in Li huanian; ch es oma ic
publica ions, including […] A. Ba anausko […]Anykščių šilelis[…]. The ou h chap e is
de o ed o discussing and e alua ing he in e lingual discou se o he Li huanian
language a he end o he 19 h cen u y and he beginning o he 20 h cen u y, and
examines he con inua ion o esea ch on he Li huanian language by young
g amma ians. The monog aph concludes wi h conclusions, lis s o ables and pain ings, li e a u e (317 posi ions) and sou ces, summa ies. The abb e ia ion is men ioned a he end in English. In summa y, i can be said ha he monog aph ce ainly mee s all he o mal equi emen s o a publica ion o his gen e.
The main posi i e, as I unde s and i , ea u es and aspec s o his i s pa o he
ilogy o monog aphs a e he ollowing: as al eady men ioned […] he book is abou
wha he dialec ologis s hough , in o he wo ds, i is a s o y abou ideas; i is no
jus a lis o he wo ks made […] i is a c i ical analysis o hose wo ks, a
highligh ing o he s ages o dialec ology dis inguished by he au ho , a pa adigm, an
analy ical and c i ical e iew o he ac i i ies o indi idual esea che s. I is
impossible no o d aw a en ion o ano he impo an s uc u al and con en
componen o he monog aph […] he au ho 's e o s no o analyze, bu o place in
he ch onological con ex o he his o y o science, he his o ical and cul u al con ex , a emp s o obs uc he Eu opean pa adigm o linguis ics […] young g amma ians.
Danguolė Mikulėnienė. Lie u ių a mė y a: genezė,
aida i pa adigminiai lūžiai. I dalis
Re iews by Re iews by 205
The pe iodiza ion o Li huanian dialec ology, al eady men ioned, is o iginal,
based on he mo i es and a gumen s p oposed by he au ho .
In e es ingly, he e m a ia ionism has ecen ly become popula in
Li huanian linguis ics.
Wi hou a doub , a chi al da a a e e y impo an : many o hem ha e no been
published o men ioned un il now […] hey g ea ly en ich he his o y o
Li huanian dialec ology and en ich he esea ch con ex . The use o a chi al
da a is ano he s eng h o he monog aph. I can also be added ha he
monog aph lacks p ope ly desc ibed illus a i e ma e ial, especially hose
illus a i e sec ions ha a e no easily a ailable in publica ions published so a .
Subjec ma e o he hi d chap e 3.2 subsec ion […]The asse ion o Young
G amma ical Concep s in Li huanian T ansla ion[…] (p. 222[…]239): his is he opic o
[…] ehabili a ion[…] by A. Ba anausko as a linguis and dialec ologis . The mos
cha ac e is ic ea u es o he ex o he monog aph and, o cou se, o i s
con en , in my opinion, a e ch onological eaching and analy ical na u e. In o he
wo ds, he ex has me ged in o a ha monious, logical and analy ical whole, o en
en iched wi h de ec i e elemen s, new ac s om he biog aphies and wo ks o
esea che s ha ha e no been known un il now. I is also impo an ha he
au ho , in exp essing he opinion, which does no necessa ily coincide wi h he mos
es ablished o widesp ead s a emen s, does no assume he ole o a ca ego ical
e alua o o judge. The monog aph lea es a lo o oom o u u e discussion, o
u u e conside a ion, e en o a di e en way o hinking. Pe haps he alue o
each new wo k can be measu ed no only in e ms o he ela ionship be ween he
objec unde conside a ion and he heo e ical and me hodological pa adigms, he
weigh and impo ance o he empi ical ma e ial, bu also in e ms o he ideas,
decons uc ions, in e p e a ions o e ed o discussion. In any case, he e is no
denial o he discussion, i allows us o look a he objec om a di e en angle,
om a di e en pe spec i e and om a di e en poin o iew. Such hings only
en ich he knowledge o he objec i sel . The monog aph o D. Mikulėnienė also
con ains a mo e de ailed discussion o wo hy subjec s. Fo example, I mysel ha e
sugges ed a sligh ly di e en classi ica ion o he s ages o he de elopmen o
Li huanian dialec ology (pa adigms o dialec ology) (see Ka delis 2019: 53[…]54), bu I
ag ee ha he model o D. Mikulėnienė can be discussed and suppo ed wi h
app op ia e a gumen s. I is possible, le us say, o conside he ela ionship
be ween he mode n e ms used in he monog aph and he linguis ic hough o he
pe iod unde conside a ion. Fo example, he a iabili y o he concep , he
ela ionship be ween he pe iod (XIX cen u y) and he pe spec i e o he concep
a e in e es ing, keeping in mind he heo e ical ounda ions o linguis ics a ha
ime. As a as can be unde s ood om Sec ion II […]Pe spec i es o Li huanian language a ia ion esea ch in he 19 h cen u y[…], i is abou , in mode n e ms, dia opic a ia ion, which a ha ime could ha dly ha e had any clea e al e na i es. Thus, he ques ion a ises as o how he au ho s men ioned in Chap e II ha e unde s ood he si ua ion: a iance o in en o y and classi ica ion o cha ac e is ics?
VYTAUTAS KARDELIS
Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXII 206 and i s annexes
Howe e , in iew o he in en ion o D. Mikulėnienė o p epa e a ilogy o
monog aphs men ioned a he beginning o his e iew, i migh be p ema u e and
no en i ely a ional o examine and discuss he i s pa o he u u e ilogy in
de ail now. As he s ill popula saying goes, he chickens coun he au umn, so a
de ailed discussion should wai o he o he wo pa s o he ilogy and a
common, comp ehensi e analysis o he Li huanian ansla ion in he ideo. Then
he whole con ex o he s udy would be seen, he ideas and conclusions would be
c ys allized and in e connec ed. So i 's going o be a lo mo e com o able and
meaning ul o discuss he big pic u e. I is possible o summa ize b ie ly: such a
his o y o Li huanian dialec ology, as D. Mikulėnienė began o w i e, was needed
long ago. I is and will be impo an no only o dialec ologis s, bu in gene al o
he his o y o Li huanian linguis ics, as well as o he o ma ion o esea ch
pe spec i es and he de elopmen o discussions. All ha emains is o wish he au ho he bes o luck and o wai o he o he pa s o he monog aph ilogy.
In he ield o li e a u e
Gieda Au elijus 2017: The Mani es o o he Clown. His o ians and his o y o Li huania
in 1883-1940 yea s, Vilnius: Vilnius Uni e si y publishing house.
Ka delis Vy au as 2018: A eal ypological complexi y o he Li huanian dialec s.
Vilnius Uni e si y publishing house in Vilnius.
Mikulėnienė Danguolė 2018: Li huanian ansla o : genesis, de elopmen and pa adigma ic
ac u es 1: he pe iod o he in e im. The beginning o Li huanian li e a u e: he
classi ica ion o li e a u e, esea ch pe spec i es, and i s ypes, Vilnius: Science and
Encyclopedia Publishing Cen e . Sabaliauskas Algi das 1979: His o y o he s udy o he Li huanian language: un il 1940, Vilnius:
I 's science.
Sabaliauskas Algi das 1982: The his o y o he s udy o he Li huanian language: 1940[…]1980, Vilnius:
I 's science.
Sabaliauskas Algi das 2012: The his o y o he s udy o he Li huanian language: 19802010, Vilnius:
Li huanian language ins i u e.
Deli e ed on 24 Ap il 2020
VYTAUTAS KARDELIS
Vilniaus uni e si e as
Facul y o Philology
The Depa men o Li huanian Language o he Ins i u e
o Speech and Language a he Uni e si y o Vilnius, 5
LT-01131 Vilnius, Li huania y au as.ka [email p o ec ed]u.l