RECENZIJOS
|
187
—
p.
214
( isu
zemaiciy
Sio
Zodzio
skiemuo
-ki-,
Gia
aseiniskiai
él
okie
sa aimingi,
a sime e
nuo
isy
Zemaiciy,
be
plg.
uuoki. is
—
p.
39,
uuoki.éa—
p.
213).
Vidiikléje
03
03
02
klausiné a,
kaip
a iamas
Jukainiy
kaimo
pa adinimas,
du
Zmonés
is a é
j kain'u,
lyg
i
abejo ina
y a
ji“kai i'u
o ma
(p.
69).
Ko ek i os
klaiduy,
kaip
didelis
umpa egis,
nelabai
no iu
nu ody i,
be
j
okius
duomenis,
kaip
b iol,is
(=b iolis)
—
p.
151,
‘ a.lgi.,daw*
(= d.lgida a)
—
p.
211,
pe ines
(=pe inés)
-
p.
213,
‘é. klu!
(=d?klu)
—
p.
69,
‘abu,di
(abiidu)
—
p.
74,
aSie“da a
(= ahi-da a)
—
p.
206,
is ums
(= is ums)
—
p.
81,
aiSkiai
nu ody ina.
Jaunoji
mokslininke
idéjo
daug
da bo,
ap asé
Sim y
kilome u
plo o
Snek as,
ne enkanéias
désningumo
dalyku,
pa eldé y
a més
ypa ybiy
(no s
da
daugelyje
ie y
galima
as i
i
pa eldé-
osios
désningos
a més
a o ojy),
be
ka
odo,
ai
Dai a
A koéai y é
u bi
i
pa eiké.
Kalbos
is o ijai
i
ai
y a
s a bu.
Reikéjo
eng i
ik
nesu ampanciy
olygiy
o my
i
Zodziu,
abejo inu
akimi kos
s y a imy,
kalban
su
(jauna
a
jaunomis)
issipusciusiomis
me gikémis.
Leisdama
$i
da ba,
jine u éjo
g e a
né
ieno
Zemai elio
a guolelio
padéjéjo,
no s
dékoja
gan
dideliam
bi iui
pa a éju
i
konsul an u.
Vy au as
Vi kauskas
Gau a
2003
05
05
Lie u iy
kalbos
ins i u as
P.
VileiSio
g.
5,
2055
Vilnius,
Lie u a
TEXTKRITISCHE
EDITION
DER
UBERSETZUNG
DES
PSALTERS
IN
DIE
LITAUISCHE
SPRACHE
VON
JOHANNES
BRETKE,
PASTOR
ZU
LABIAU
UND
KONIGSBERG
I.
PR.,
NACH
DER
HANDSCHRIFT
AUS
DEM
JAHRE
1580
UND
DER
UBERARBEITETEN
FASSUNG
DIESES
PSALTERS
VON
JOHANNES
REHSA,
PASTOR
ZU
KONGSBERG
I.
PR.,
NACH
DEM
DRUCK
AUS
DEM
JAHRE
1625
NEBST
DER
UBERSETZUNG
DES
PSALTERS
IN
DIE
DEUTSCHE
SPRACHE
VON
MARTIN
LUTHER
NACH
DER
AUSGA-
BE
AUS
DEM
JAHRE
1545
UNTER
MITARBEIT
VON
FRIEDEMANN
KLUGE.
MIT
EINER
EINLEITUNG
VERSEHEN
UND
HERAUSGEGEBEN
VON
FRIEDRICH
SCHOLZ.
Pade bo n,
Munich,
Vienna,
Zii ich:
Fe dinand
Schéningh,
2002,
LXXXI
+
559
p.,
ISBN
3-506-71681-6.
(Biblia
Sla ica,
Se ie
VI:
Supplemen um:
Biblia
Li huanica,
Reihe
2:
Edi ionsbande,
6.
Publis-
hed
by
Hans
Ro he
and
F ied ich
Scholz
wi h
he
collabo a ion
o
Ch is ian
Hannick
and
Ludge
Udolph.)
In
he
o ewo d
(p.
IX—X)
Scholz
w i es
ha
Johannes
B e ke
(B e kiinas)
comple ed
he
Li huanian
ansla ion
o
he
en i e
Holy
Sc ip u es
be ween
Ma ch
1579
and
No embe
1590,
bu
un il
now
only
he
Psal e
had
appea ed
be o e
in
p in .
This
Psal e ,
ansla ed
be ween
he
20 h
o
May
and
he
middle
o
July
1580,
came
in o
he
hands
o
Johannes
Rehsa,
who
e ised
and
published
i
along
wi h
Lu he ’s
Ge man
ansla ion
in
1625
in
he
Lau enz
Segebad
p ess.
The
common
s a emen
ha
Rehsa’s
e sion
di e s
li le
om
B e kiinas’ ansla ion
is
jus
no
ue
as
a
glance
a
he
wo
ex s
will
easily
show.
The
olume
discussed
he e
con ains
bo h
B e kunas’
o iginal
and
Rehsa’s
e ision
on
acing
pages.
A
he
eques
o
P o .
Jonas
Palionis
188
|
RECENZIJOS
o
he
Uni e si y
o
Vilnius
i
was
decided
o
add
a
e sion
o
Lu he ’s
Ge man
ansla ion
appea ing
be o e
1580,
since
his
ansla ion
is
no
always
easily
a ailable
in
Li huania.
This
appea s
a
he
bo om
o
he
page.
The
olume
unde
e iew
he e
is
pa
o
an
ex emely
ambi ious
p ojec
o
publish
he
en i e
B e kinas
Bible
ansla ion
(p.
X1)
in
h ee
se ies,
se ies
1
o
be
acsimile
olumes,
se ies
2
o
be
edi ion
olumes
and
se ies
3
o
be
commen a ies.
So
a
six
olumes
o
B e kiinas’
manusc ip
ha e
appea ed
in
ou
acsimile
olumes.
In
addi ion
a
commen a y
olume
Baus eine
zu
B e ke-
Fo schung
by
Jochen
D.
Range
has
also
appea ed.
I
e iewed
his
la e
olume
and
he
acsimile
olume
o
he
Psal e
in
1993
in
Li uanus
39
(3),
72-84.
I
am
looking
o wa d
o
he
appea ance
o
Scholz’s
commen a y
on
B e kinas’
ansla ion
o
he
Psal e
now
in
p epa a ion.
He e
Scholz
p omises
a
compa ison
wi h
Rehsa’s
ansla ion
and
he
s udy
o
he
ela ionship
o
B e kiinas’
ansla ion
o
i s
a ious
sou ces,
Lu he ’s
ansla ion,
he
ex
o
he
Heb ew
o iginal,
he
Sep-
uagin
and
he
Vulga e.
Scholz
also
desc ibes
his
i s
acquain ance
wi h
he
manusc ip
o
B e kiinas’
Bible
ansla-
ion
in
1949
in
Go ingen
in
he
o ice
o
P o .
Reinha d
Wi am
and
he
subsequen
placemen
o
he
manusc ip
in
he
Geheime
S aa sa chi
in
Be lin.
Fo una ely
Scholz
was
able
o
enlis
he
help
o
he
e y
compe en
Jochen
D.
Range
and
hen
la e
F iedemann
Kluge.
The
in oduc ion
in o ms
us
ha
al hough
he
acsimile
edi ion
is
in
gene al
qui e
good,
he e
a e
some
co ec ions
and
glosses
in
he
ma gins
ha
a e
ha dly
legible
o
no
legible
a
all.
Ina
ew
cases
he
inal
le e s
o
wo ds
on
he
e so
side
o
he
ini ial
le e s
on
he
ec o
side
we e
so
close
o
he
edge
o
he
ex
in
he
old
o
he
manusc ip
ha
he
came a
could
no
pick
hem
up.
Someone
who
knows
B e kiinas’
o hog aphy
and
g amma
would
ha e
no
ouble
in
supplying
hese
o
he
mos
pa ,
al hough
we
do
encoun e
some
su p ises
he e.
Some imes
he
a ying
cha ac e is ics
o
he
ink
can
be
o
help
in
de e mining
an
o iginal
o m.
When
le e s
o
syllab-
les
a e
dele ed
and
new
ones
a e
w i en
o e
he
o iginal,
some imes
he
da ke
ink
o
he
o iginal
is
isible
h ough
he
ligh e
ink
o
he
co ec ion,
allowing
one
o
es ablish
bo h
he
o iginal
and
he
co ec ion
(p.
XX).
Since
bo h
he
o iginal
ex
and
he
co ec ed
e sion
can
only
be
es o ed
by
using
he
manusc ip ,
a
c i ical
commen a y
on
he
ex
is
equi ed
in
addi-
ion
o
he
acsimile
edi ion.
The
in oduc ion
(pp.
XXI-XXIV)
o e s
also
b ie
biog aphies
and
e alua ions
o
he
wo k
o
B e kiinas
and
Rehsa.
Following
his
is
a
desc ip ion
o
he
ex
and
he
way
in
which
i
was
p epa ed
o
publica ion.
B e kiinas’
ini ial
e sion
(G undschich ,
abb e ia ed
as
GS)
u nish-
es
he
basis
o
he
ex
p in ed
he e.
A
he
same
ime
co ec ions
which
we e
made
immedia-
ely
o
sho ly
a e
he
ini ial
e sion
was
w i en
down
a e
ma ked
wi h
he
le e s
a,
b,c,
e c.
and
gi en
as
no es
unde
he
ini ial
e sion.
These
co ec ions
a e
labeled
S k
(=
So o ko ek-
u );
la e
co ec ions
a e
labeled
KS
(=
Ko ek u schich ).
Acco ding
o
he
in oduc ion
(p.
XXXVI)
Daniel
Gallus
made
28
co ec ions
(labeled
G)
and
Rehsa
136
(labeled
R).
(On
p.
XVIII
he
explana ions
o
he
abb e ia ions
KS
and
R
appea
wice,
an
appa en
o e sigh
in
p oo eading.)
The
di e ences
be ween
Palionis’
1983
edi ion
and
Scholz’s
edi ion
a e
e iden
om
he
e y
i s
e se
o
he
i s
psalm:
Acco ding
o
Scholz’
es o a ion
o
he
o iginal
(GS)
(
p.
6):
Ge ai
am,
ku ai
newaik{ch=
||
czoia
ode
Diewa
ne ibijanczu
nei
ei
kieliu
g ie{nuiu
nei
iedjia
||
ku
apiok ieghi
iedsia;
acco ding
o
Palionis
(1983:
183):
Palaimin as
<bijans
Diewo
eisus>
i a
as
wi as,
ku sai
ne
waikschczoio
su inkime
Diewo
ne ibijanczuju,
nei
sussisedeghime
apiok uiu
se-
RECENZIJOS
|
189
deio.
nei
an
kelio
g ieschnuiu
s oweio.
Scholz
also
gi es
his
ea ly
Lu he an
e sion:
Wol
dem
de
nich
wandel
im
Ra
de
Go lo en,
Noch
i
au
den
Weg
de
Siinde ,
Noch
i ze
da
die
Spé e
Ji zen.
The
Vulga e,
howe e ,
has:
Bea us
es
i
ille,
qui
non
ambula
in
consilio
imp obo um,
e
iae
pecca o um
non
insis i ,
ac
in
consessu
de iso um
non
deside ;
and
he
Sep uagin
has:
waxde og
aie,
Og
odx
éxope dy
e
Bou g
daeB& ,
xal
e
636
duso o dy
odx
Zo y,
xah
exh
xa9édoa
dowdy
obx
éxa9 ce .
The
King
James
e sion
has:
‘Blessed
is
he
man
ha
walke h
no
in
he
Counsel
o
he
ungodly,
no
s ande h
in
he
way
o
sinne s,
no
si e h
in
he
sea
o
he
sco n ul.’
The
wo ds
Ge ai
am,
ku ai...
‘I
is
good
o
he
one,
who...’
o
B e kiinas’
ini ial
e sion
seem
o
be
close
o
Lu he ’s
Wol
dem
de ...
han
o
he
La in
Bea us
es
i
ille,
qui...
“Blessed
is
he
man
ha ...’
o
G eek
yaxdp og
a qg,
dc...
I
su mise
ha
Lu he
made
use
o
he
Heb ew
o iginal,
he
co esponding
i s
ew
wo ds
o
which
my
colleague
P o .
B.
Halpe n
o
he
Penn
S a e
Jewish
S udies
p og am
ansli e a es
as
‘as é
ha-
is
“Se
he
meaning
o
which
is
no
ha
o
he
appa en
cons uc
s a e.
P o .
Halpe n
no es
u he
ha
he
wo d
‘as é
unc ions
as
hough
i
had
a
leas
implici
p edica ion
in
i
and
he
exp ession
is
o
be
ansla ed
as
‘blessed/
o una e/
happy
is
he
man
who...’
This
seems
o
show
ha
he
Sep uagin
a he s
unde s ood
Heb ew
be e
han
Ma in
Lu he .
A
i s
B e kiinas
ollowed
Lu he ,
whe eas
he
co ec ions
wi h
Palaimin as
‘blessed’
(Pa chlowin as)
o
Rehsa’s
Jschgani ingas...
we e
based
on
he
Vul-
ga e
o
Sep uagin .
In
any
case
i
will
be
in e es ing
o
lea n
wha
Scholz
says
abou
his
and
he
many
o he
p oblems
connec ed
wi h
he
Psal e
in
his
o hcoming
c i ical
commen a y
men io-
ned
abo e.
The
in oduc ion
also
p esen s
an
in e es ing
analysis
o
he
phonemic
sys em
(pp.
XLIV—
LXIV).
Acco ding
o
he
in oduc ion
(p.
XLIV)
he
consonan
phonemes
can
be
ep esen ed
by
one
o
i e
le e s,
e.g.,
>c<
can
ep esen
/c/,
>c3<
can
ep esen
/¢/,
> ch<
can
ep e-
sen
/§/
>
{chc3<
can
ep esen
/8¢/.
On
he
i s
eading
his
would
seem
o
mean
ha
/Sé/
is
conside ed
a
single
phoneme,
an
in e p e a ion
which
smacks
o
a
Sla ic
o ien a ion
(c .
Rus-
sian
1)
and
one
which
would
be
ha d
o
jus i y
o
Li huanian
(see
Klimas
1970:
passim.).
I
One
is
o
in e p e
he
s a emen
as
me ely
deno ing
he
uppe
limi
o
consonan
le e s
in
sequence
hen
he
s a emen
is
inco ec ,
c .,
e.g.,
newaik{chcjoia
‘does
no
walk’
in
which
we
encoun e
he
sequence
o
six
consonan
le e s,
iz.,
>k {chc3<
which
would
seem
o
ende
he
h ee
phonemes
/kS€/.
Mo e
in e es ing
possibly
is
he
ep esen a ion
o
he
ocalic
sys em
whe e
he
le e
sequence
>ie<
is
e y
ambiguous.
In
he
o iginal
e sion
(GS)
i
could
deno e
/ie/,
/6/
o
e en
/e/
a e
a
ela
consonan
whe e
he
le e
>i<
was
used
me ely
o
deno e
pala aliza ion.
Acco ding
o
Scholz
(p.
LII)
la e
in
he
co ec ed
e sion
(KS)
B e kinas
ied
o
elimina e
he
>i<
be o e
he
>e<
ollowing
a
ela
and
whe e
he
sequence
deno ed
e ymolo-
gical
/é/.
Thus
kieliu
‘on
he
pa h’
in
he
o iginal
e sion
is
changed
o
(an )
kelio
in
he
co ec ed
e sion
(p.
6)
and
Kodiel
‘why’
in
he
o iginal
e sion
is
co ec ed
o
Kodel
(p.
10),
c .
con empo-
a y
s anda d
kodel.
The
diph hongal
p onuncia ion
is
co ec ly
and
consis en ly
ende ed,
e.g.,
in
p ieg
‘nea ’
(p.
6).
To
sum
up,
Scholz
and
his
colleagues
a e
o
be
complimen ed
on
he
idea
o
publishing
his
se ies,
and
pa icula ly
his
olume,
which
shows
he
ou s anding
esul s
o
many
hou s
o
ca e ul
and
pains aking
labo .
The
book
is
beau i ully
bound,
on
high
quali y
pape
and
he e-
o e
a
c edi
o
he
publishe
as
well
as
he
edi o s.
Acco ding
o
my
ba h oom
scale
he
book
weighs
mo e
han
h ee
pounds,
making
i
a
weigh y
ome
bo h
in
he
li e al
and
igu a i e
sense.
190
|
RECENZIJOS
REFERENCES
PALIONIS,
J.,
ZUKAUSKAITE,
J.
eds.
1983:
B e kiinas,
Johannes.
Rink iniai
aS ai,
Vilnius:
Mokslas.
KiiMas,
A.
1970:
Some
a emp s
o
in en o y
Li huanian
phonemes.
Th.
F.
Magne
and
W.
R.
Schmals ieg,
eds.,
Bal ic
linguis ics,
Uni e si y
Pa k
and
London:
Pennsyl ania
S a e
Uni e si y
P ess,
93-102.
William
R.
Schmals ieg
Gau a
2003
06
09
814
Co nwall
Road
S a e
College,
Pa.
16803
[email p o ec ed]