S aipsniai / A icles 119
ROMAN VASKO
Kyi Na ional Linguis ic Uni e si y
ORCID id: o cid.o g / 0000-0002-6499-2972
Fields o in e es : diach onic phonology o he Ge manic
languages, linguis ic p ocesses o semio iza ion o p ima y
ma e ial and spi i ual cul u e a i ac s, his o y o ancien
ci iliza ions, his o y o Sume ian and Akkadian w i ing,
in e cul u al communica ion, e c.
ALLA KOROLYOVA
Kyi Na ional Linguis ic Uni e si y
ORCID id: o cid.o g / 0000-0001-5541-5914
Fields o in e es : linguis ic an h opology, linguo- and
mac ocompa a i e s udies, Indo-Eu opean linguis ics,
combina o ial seman ics, in e cul u al ans e .
TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
Na ional Pedagogical D agomano Uni e si y
ORCID id: o cid.o g/0000-0002-9535-9248
Fields o in e es : signi ican a e ac s, p eceden me apho s,
heo y o concep ual in eg a ion, my honyms.
DOI: doi.o g/10.35321/all87-06
PRECEDENT PROPER NAMES
AND THEIR INTERCULTURAL
TRANSFER
P eceden iniai ik iniai a dai i jų
a pkul ū inis pe kėlimas
ANNOTATION
The a icle deals wi h he p oblem o in e cul u al ans e o global and p eceden
p ope names as educed in e ex s, which a e signs and symbols in an ou going cul u e
ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
120 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII
and ansmi new senses in pe cei ing cul u es. As a gene al esea ch idea, we sugges
dis inguishing he concep o in e cul u al ans e as a way o ansmi ing in o ma ion
o a di e ence in ime, na u e, and in e cul u al communica ion. I in ol es he s udy o
he speci ics o linguis ic phenomena in con ac ing cul u es o ensu e he e ec i eness o
communica ion.
Special a en ion is paid o he s udy o co ela ion o he ela ed bu no iden ical
concep s – p eceden and in e ex ual. The i s is associa ed wi h he linguis ic o m o he
embodimen o he s e eo ype in he o m o a p ope name, which is a conduc o o sou ce
o ixing in o ma ion in a educed o m. The second one is cha ac e ized by he abili y o
accumula e in o ma ion by e lec ing on eali y and ex ac ing i om o he ex s in a b oad
sense. The p imacy o he p eceden o a p ope name in p o o-cul u e and he seconda y
na u e o i s in e ex ual cha ac e wi h in ini e ep oducibili y o new senses ha e been
es ablished.
The o igin o p eceden p ope names and hei ole as linguocul u al sou ces and
in e ex ual in o ma ion has been de e mined.
Due o hei igu a i eness, he main ypes o p ope names a e ans o med in mode n
mass cul u e, which con ibu es o he o maliza ion o he p ope names’ semio ics and
ac ualiza ion o hei iconici y. The ul ima e goal o he p ope name’s o m is he p agma ic
impac on he ecipien o he in o ma ion in he ini ial linguocul u e and in he p ocess o
in e cul u al ans e .
KEYWORDS: p eceden p ope names, in e cul u al ans e , in e ex uali y,
educed in e ex , semio ics o p ope names, con ac ing
linguocul u es.
ANOTACIJA
S aipsnyje analizuojama a p au inių i p eceden inių ik inių a dų, kaip edukuo ų
in e eks ų, ku ie y a am ik os pi minės kul ū os ženklai i simboliai, pe duodan ys naujas
p asmes p iimančioms kul ū oms, a pkul ū inio pe kėlimo p oblema. Pagal bend ąją
y imo idėją, siūlome išski i a pkul ū inio pe kėlimo są oką kaip laiko, pobūdžio i
a pkul ū inės komunikacijos p asme ski ingos in o macijos pe da imo būdą. Tai aip pa
apima i kalbinių eiškinių speci iškumo y imą są eikaujančiose kul ū ose am, kad bū ų
už ik in as komunikacijos e ek y umas.
Daug dėmesio ski iama susijusių, be neiden iškų są okų – p eceden inis i in e eks ualus –
ko eliacijai. Pi moji są oka y a susijusi su kalbine s e eo ipo įkūnijimo o ma, iš eiškiama
ik iniu a du, ku i y a in o macijos už iksa imo edukuo a o ma laidininkas a šal inis.
An oji są oka y a apib ėžiama kaip gebėjimas sukaup i in o maciją e lek uojan ealybę
i su enkan ją iš ki ų eks ų plačiąja p asme. S aipsnyje nus a y as ik inio a do
p eceden iškumo pi mumas pi minėje kul ū oje i an inis jo in e eks ualumo pobūdis su
ne ibo a naujų p asmių kū imo galimybe.
S aipsniai / A icles 121
P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e
S aipsnyje nus a y a p eceden inių ik inių a dų kilmė i jų, kaip ling okul ū inių
šal inių i in e eks inės in o macijos, aidmuo.
Pag indinių ik inių a dų ipų aizdingumas leidžia juos ans o muo i šiuolaikinėje
masinėje kul ū oje, o ai p isideda p ie ik inių a dų semio ikos o maliza imo i jų
ikoniškumo ak ualiza imo. Galu inis ik inio a do o mos ikslas y a p agma inis
in o macijos po eikis ad esa ui pi minėje ling okul ū oje i a pkul ū inio pe da imo
p ocese.
ESMINIAI ŽODŽIAI: p eceden iniai ik iniai a dai, a pkul ū inis pe kėlimas,
in e eks ualumas, edukuo as in e eks as, ik inių a dų
semio ika, są eikaujančios ling okul ū os.
INTRODUCTION
Cogni i e onomas ics (Ka penko 2010, 2015; Ju ka 2009) is one o he
new b anches o cogni i e linguis ics. The main ask o cogni i e onomas ics
is o de elop heo e ical undamen als and me hodological p ocedu es
aimed a s udying he mechanisms o men aliza ion o p ope names/onyms
(Héois 2020; Vaxelai e 2016) bo h in he indi idual and in he collec i e
language consciousness o ep esen a i es o a ce ain linguis ic cul u e.
I is he possession o backg ound knowledge ha is pa o he cogni i e
base and has an in a ian cha ac e , i “allows he indi idual, acco ding o
D. B. Gudko , o na iga e in he space o linguocul u e and comply wi h
i s no ms and ules” (2003). The basis o such knowledge in he cogni i e
base o linguocul u e is p eceden phenomena (Bahan 2014; Kal’čenko 2014;
Saxa uk 2011, e c.).
Wi hou going in o he his o y o he de elopmen o he heo y o he
p eceden , we will b ie ly dwell only on hose poin s ha co espond o he
classi ica ion o phenomena ela ed o he p eceden . A he same ime, we
no e ha he me hodology o s udying hese phenomena began o be ac i ely
de eloped only a he end o he 20 h – he beginning o he 21s cen u y.
In ou opinion, he e m “p eceden ex ” was mos widely used. I apidly
acqui ed a numbe o double s, including he iden i ie “p eceden ” in i s
composi ion. And he mo e ac i ely his se ies was eplenished, he mo e clea ly
he need o hei di e en ia ion ma u ed. O e ime, he e m “p eceden
phenomenon” was p oposed as a hype nym o all hyponyms wi h he iden i ie
“p eceden ”.
The e iew o scien i ic li e a u e shows ha he ollowing hyponyms a e he
mos common ones: 1) “p eceden ex ”, 2) “p eceden si ua ion”, 3) “p eceden
s a emen ” and 4) “p eceden p ope name”.
ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
122 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII
Recen ly, we ha e been wi nessing he app oba ion o he e m “p eceden
wo ld”, o example, in he wo k o Genadij G. Slyškin’s Linguocul u al concep s
and me aconcep s (2004: 154). The scien is de ines he p eceden wo ld as a se o
indi idual p eceden phenomena (names, s a emen s, si ua ions), 1) ascending
o a single sou ce, 2) pe cei ed by na i e speake s as in e connec ed, 3) egula ly
upda ed in a ious combina ions wi h each o he (Slyškin 2004: 154). A he
same ime, G. G. Slyškin belie es ha an appeal o p eceden wo lds makes
i possible o con ey mo e complex cul u al meanings han an appeal o
indi idual p eceden phenomena. Howe e , such a s a emen , in ou opinion, is
no con incing enough, since each o he abo e ypes o p eceden phenomena
(names, s a emen s, si ua ions) equally mee s he abo e h ee condi ions and
con ibu es o he ansmission o a complex seman ic con en .
To a gue ou poin o iew, we p esen he de ini ions a ailable in he scien i ic
li e a u e o each o he ou hyponyms o p eceden phenomena, aking in o
accoun ou co ec ion. A “p eceden ex ” is a complex sign amilia o a
ep esen a i e o he linguocul u e, he appeal o which is o en esumed in he
p ocess o communica ion wi h he help o s a emen s and symbols associa ed
wi h his ex . A “p eceden si ua ion” is a kind o p o o ype si ua ion wi h
conno a ions cha ac e is ic o i s s e eo ype. A “p eceden s a emen ” is a piece
o speech con aining a well-known quo a ion. A “p eceden p ope name” is
an indi idual name associa ed ei he wi h i s widely known quo a ions and
e en en i e ex s ha ha e become p eceden o wi h si ua ions known o
ep esen a i es o he linguocul u e.
As o he p eceden p ope name, i is easy o see ha i s scien i ic scope is
closely ela ed o he p e ious h ee ypes o p eceden phenomena. Le us
jus poin ou he ac ha oday in he wo ks on onomas ics one can obse e
he ac i a ion o a ious op ions o es ing he e m “p eceden p ope
names”, such as “p eceden onyms” (Naximo a 2011), “p eceden oponyms”
(Be ezo ič 2009), e c., wha we will alk abou below in he esea ch pa o
he a icle and, in pa icula , ha he heo y o p ecedence is he ounda ion
o he heo y o in e ex uali y. Thus, e u ning o he ques ion o he essence
o he e m “p eceden wo ld” in he iew o G. G. Slyškin, he e is e e y
eason o asse ha complex meanings do no ansla e o he ac ual p eceden
phenomena, bu hose ha ha e acqui ed an in e ex ual s a us (bo h indi idually
and in combina ion wi h each o he ).
In connec ion wi h such a s a emen o he p oblem, he ques ion a ises:
is e e y p ope name a p eceden ? The answe o his ques ion is ob ious i
we conside ha he p ecedence o he onym is due o i s cogni i e-semio ic
unc ion, and subsequen ly o he po en ial abili y o gene a e and ep oduce
in e ex ual meanings in he space o he o iginal linguocul u e. I a p ope
S aipsniai / A icles 123
P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e
name mig a es o ano he linguocul u e, hen in he p ocess o ans e ing
i s in e ex ual meanings, i acqui es an in e na ional, i.e. global, cha ac e . In
he p ocess o ans e iza ion, he onyms o he o iginal linguocul u e unde go
signi ican changes in he o m and meaning in he ecei ing cul u e up o hei
eplacemen , bu a he same ime, hey do no lose hei in e ex ual links wi h
he dono . Due o hese connec ions, in e na ionaliza ion o globaliza ion o
onyms akes place.
The scien i ic idea o mula ed in he a icle is ele an and p omising o he
u he de elopmen o he heo e ical p o isions o mode n cogni i e onomas ics
whose ep esen a i es (Ka penko 2015 and o he s), on he one hand, con ince
us ha onyms ha e no only seman ics bu also concep ual ea u es and e en
ame s uc u e, on he o he hand, special a en ion is paid o he disclosu e o
hei meanings as p eceden phenomena o linguocul u e (Bahan 2014: 44‒45).
P eceden phenomena a e able o play he ole o s e eo yping knowledge bo h
wi hin he same linguocul u al space and in he p ocess o in e cul u al ans e .
The pu pose o he a icle is o conside p ope names as p eceden
phenomena o he o iginal linguocul u e and hei abili y o gene a e new
meanings in he p ocess and as a esul o in e cul u al ans e in he ecei ing
linguocul u es.
The objec i es o he a icle:
– o cla i y he ela ionship be ween he e ms “p ecedence” and
“in e ex uali y”, “in e ex uali y” and “in e ex ”;
– o in oduce he e m “onymic in e ex ” in o he scien i ic appa a us o
cogni i e onomas ics;
– o de elop a me hodological algo i hm o he analysis o he h ee phases
o in e cul u al ans e o p eceden p ope names;
– based on he examples o he analysis o p ope names, o e eal hei
p eceden , in e ex ual and global na u e upda ed in he p ocess and as a esul
o in e cul u al ans e ;
– o ace new ends associa ed wi h he s age o o mal semio iza ion o
p eceden p ope names.
1. RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONCEPTS
OF PRECEDENCE, INTERTEXTUALITY
AND INTERTEXT
The p ocess o globaliza ion o all sphe es o li e in e e y socie y oday
equi es a mo e ho ough s udy o he na ional and cul u al cha ac e is ics

ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
124 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII
o in e cul u al communica ion, as well as he p ocess o knowledge ans e ,
he so-called “ ans e ” (P osku in, P osku ina 2017). Usually, wo ypes o
in e cul u al ans e a e dis inguished: communica ion i sel and knowledge
ans e . Communica ion is always ca ied ou in synch ony, in he same ime
pe iod, and he ans e o knowledge in ol es an addi ional appeal o al eady
accumula ed knowledge ela ed o di e en ime pe iods, e en s, e c.
These s a emen s indica e ha bo h communica ion and knowledge ans e
bo de on such phenomena as p eceden , which is based on he s e eo ype o ideas
abou agmen s and objec s o he su ounding wo ld and hei e baliza ion
in na ional linguocul u es, and in e ex uali y, which is p ima ily associa ed wi h
he e lec ion o cul u al con ac s be ween gene a ions.
In e ex uali y, acco ding o Ju ij M. Lo man, is a kind o “semio ic
memo y o cul u e”, which is cha ac e ized no only by he accumula ion o
new in o ma ion h ough he knowledge o agmen s o eali y bu also by he
ajec o ies o i s ex ac ion om exis ing ex s (2001: 213). In his ega d, he
emphasized (Lo man 2001: 213) ha “ he ex does no exis on i s own, bu
i is necessa ily placed in his o ical, eal o condi ional con ex s […]; hus, he
pe cep ion o he ex ou side his backg ound is no possible.
Conside ing in e ex uali y as a key ool o he ans e o meanings, he
o igins o which go back o agmen s o di e en imes, le us u n o he
de ini ion o Vladimi N. Topo o , who called he ex as a kind o “diach onic
ma ix” (Topo o 1987), in he cons uc ion o which ano he ex is highligh ed.
The ma e ial embodimen o he p ocess o in e ex uali y is he in e ex
con aining links wi h he dono ex and i s seman ic po en ial/ he so-called
in a ian (Rjabinina 2007). One o he ypes o such in e ex in i s olded o m
is a p ope name/onym.
Being signs o p eceden ex s, p eceden si ua ions and p eceden s a emen s,
p ope names gain popula i y in linguocul u e and, hus, become ac ualize s
o new meanings in he s uc u e o eady-made in e ex s. In his case, hey
al eady pe o m a cogni i e-semio ic unc ion as cul u ally mo i a ed ma ke s
o signi ican e en s, ac s, and si ua ions, assigning a seconda y ole o he
iden i ica ion unc ion, i.e. labels.
In he p ocess o in e cul u al ans e , a p ope name independen ly as a
olded in e ex ( o designa e i in he a icle we p opose a new e m onymic
in e ex ) wi h al eady acqui ed symbolism and seman ic load in he ou going
linguocul u e o as a componen o he in e ex in he ecei ing linguocul u e
adia es new meanings and acqui es an in e na ional, so-called global, cha ac e
due o i s o iginal p ecedence. The onymic in e ex , he e o e, is “a p oduc o
he ans o ma ion o ano he ex ” (K is e a 1995: 99), which necessa ily goes
h ough he s age o p ecedence in one o he con ac ing cul u es, which la e
S aipsniai / A icles 125
P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e
se es as a gene a o o new meanings in a gi en di ec ion and ime. In o he
wo ds, i is a guideline o he p oduc ion o new meanings on he basis o a
eady-made p eceden .
Discussing he on ology o in e ex and linking i wi h he en i onmen
o exis ence o cul u al concep s, Ju ij S. S epano (2001: 3) poin s ou ha
“in e ex is only he i s language loo o he esul o he in e ac ion o ex s.
The nex “ loo s” consis o un eadable cons uc s – concep s, images, ideas
– “men al wo lds” o hei componen s. In o he wo ds, ac ing as ma ke s o
p o o ex s a he language le el, in e ex ual inclusions a he cogni i e le el
appeal o he cogni i e base o he c ea o s o meanings.
In a b oad sense, in e ex is a complex sign o he o iginal linguocul u e and
he equency ep oduc ion o ph ases (winged sayings, s a emen s o amous
pe sonali ies, quo a ions, e c.) om he discou ses o a pa icula linguocul u e.
We ind a simila de ini ion o in e ex in Galina V. Deniso a, who also de ines
his cons uc as he esul o e e ing o signi ican e en s o cul u al ac s ha
ha e become p eceden , as well as o quo es om amous pe sonali ies (2003:
77). On his occasion, Bo is M. Gaspa o w o e: “[...] language ac i i y is
ca ied ou as a con inuous s eam o ci a ion, which is ex ac ed om he
conglome a e o language memo y. This quo a ion und is illed wi h uni s o
a ying deg ees o comple eness – communica i e agmen s ha a e s o ed
in memo y as i s s a iona y pa s and wi h which he speake ope a es when
c ea ing and in e p e ing meanings” (Gaspa o 1996: 14).
Majkl Ri a e (1980) called in e ex an in a ian o a gi en s uc u al-
seman ic model, he a ian s o which a e p ima ily cons uc ed in he o iginal
linguocul u e wi hin he amewo k o codes cha ac e is ic o i . A he same
ime, linguocul u e is conside ed a space o alue meanings c ea ed by i s
ep esen a i es in he p ocess o hei pe cep ion o he wo ld, and i s codes
as seconda y sign sys ems, whe e a ious ma e ial means a e used o hei
e baliza ion (Ko šo a 2009: 241). The coded alue meaning o ms a sys em o
linguocul u e codes and, in gene al, a language wo ld iew, which e lec s he
wo ld iew o a pa icula socie y (Ibid.).
As o onymic in e ex s, acco ding o ou p elimina y obse a ions, in hei
igu a i e meaning, hey ep esen a ans e o a p eceden winged saying wi h
an onymic componen o seman ics and i s inhe en linguocul u al in o ma ion
o c ea e and ansla e a new in e ex ual meaning bo h wi hin he o iginal
linguocul u e and in he con ac ing language wo ld iew.
Rega ding he p esence o p eceden cha ac e is ics in winged sayings
o ph aseological uni s in a b oad sense, he discussion is s ill ongoing. In his
ega d, he a gumen s o Vik o P. G igo ’e (2000: 578‒580) a e o special
in e es , because hey a e he well-known winged sayings ela ed o he so-called
ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
126 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII
“ ans” ph aseology which a e a new g oup o candida es o in e ex s”.
G igo ’e also no es ha “ he ime o he concep o ansna ional ph aseology
may no ha e come ye , bu he p e equisi es o discussing i s in e ex ual code
ha e al eady ma u ed” (2000: 578‒580). And i we ollow ou assump ions ha
p ecedence is a cogni i e basis o c ea ing in e ex ual meanings, and aking
in o accoun he abo e de ini ions o he ou ypes o p eceden phenomena,
hen he answe is ob iously in a ou o he p eceden s a us o such a
ype o onymic in e ex s as winged sayings. In addi ion, since mos o he
winged sayings/ph ases e lec he s e eo ypes o na ional consciousness, hei
p ecedence is an obliga o y p oposi ional phase o in e ex uali y.
In he si ua ion wi h he p eceden p ope names o global na u e, i is
in e ex uali y ha plays he ole o a ansla o o meanings ha ha e passed
he es o ime and exis h oughou he li e o many peoples in he o m o
a special anscul u al code. And i is no coincidence ha in e ex uali y is
conside ed a b oadcas code o wo ld cul u e – a sys em o adi ional alues o
humani y, bo h ma e ial and spi i ual (Vasko, Ko olyo a 2021).
To sea ch o he ajec o ies o he eme gence o in e ex ual meanings
on he cogni i e basis o p eceden p ope names and hei u he analysis
wi h he econs uc ion o he p ima y con en in he o iginal linguocul u e
and i s u he ans e o he ecei ing linguocul u es, a comp ehensi e
me hodological app oach, and ele an me hods and echniques a e p oposed,
which a e desc ibed in he nex pa ag aph.
2. METHODOLOGY OF STUDYING
THE INTERCULTURAL TRANSFER
OF PRECEDENT PROPER NAMES
Using he e m in e cul u al communica ion, esea che s unde s and i as “ he
p ocess o communica ion o language pe sonali ies who belong o di e en
linguocul u al communi ies and demons a e di e ences […]” (Gudko 2003a:
51), while ep esen a i es o he heo y o in e cul u al ans e de elop me hods
o analyzing in e e ences, hyb idiza ions, ans o ma ions ha mani es
hemsel es when he meanings o bo h simul aneous and non- empo al
phenomena o con ac ing cul u es come in o con ac .
Based on he heo e ical p e equisi es o s udying he p ocesses and esul s
o in e cul u al ans e , one should apply hose me hods and echniques ha
a e aimed p ima ily a econs uc ing he ajec o ies o he “cul u al mo emen ”
o meanings.
S aipsniai / A icles 127
P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e
Today, he discussion con inues abou he need o imp o e he me hodological
p ocedu e o analyzing he ways o ans o ming hose concep ual meanings
ha a ise when hey a e “impo ed” and “expo ed” om one cul u e o ano he
since i is no so much he na ional-speci ic di e ences o a pa icula cul u e
(which a e gi en special a en ion in he heo y o in e cul u al communica ion),
bu a he many e ealed ajec o ies o mig a ion o meanings (which a e
impo an o he heo y o in e cul u al ans e ).
The aced di ec ions o he o ma ion o new meanings o p eceden p ope
names in he ecei ing cul u es p ima ily e lec hei in e ex ual na u e, since
hey a e he esul o a blending (combina ion) o agmen s con aining hese
cul u ally signi ican phenomena al eady in he new linguocul u al space.
A comp ehensi e me hodology o analyzing p eceden p ope names in
he o iginal linguocul u e and gene a ing new in e ex ual meanings on hei
cogni i e basis in he p ocess o hei ans e o he ecei ing linguocul u e
includes se e al manda o y s eps using he in e p e i e-con ex ual me hod, he
compa a i e me hod, he linguop agma ic me hod, and he componen analysis
me hod.
Le us p esen he me hodology de eloped by us o analyzing he ajec o ies
o he eme gence o new in e ex ual meanings o p eceden p ope names in
he p ocess o hei in e cul u al ans e .
As i was no ed, he mechanism o pene a ion o a i ac s o one cul u e in o
ano he is launched wi h he pa icipa ion o he so-called his o ical and cul u al
“media o s” (o igins, sou ces) ha ans e knowledge/meaning/in o ma ion
o ano he con ex o pe cep ion. Such in e media ies a e, acco ding o he
gene alized ema ks o Elena L. Be ezo ič (2009), Ma ija È. Ru (2001; 2008),
I ina F. Za a ins’ka (2022), sou ces o linguocul u al mo i a ion wi h hei
p o o ypes, among which a special place is occupied by li e a y, ancien , eligious
and biblical p ope names, which ha e become, in ou opinion, in e na ional
p eceden phenomena in he p ocess o b oad ans e iza ion. Thei ans e o
ano he cul u al sys em is a dynamic p ocess consis ing o h ee main phases:
selec ion, ans e and ecep ion, which unde lie he p oposed me hodology o
s udying p ecedence, in e ex uali y and in e na ionali y o p ope names.
The i s s age is a phase o selec ion o a p eceden p ope name in he
o iginal linguocul u e, which in ol es he econs uc ion o he sou ces and
o igins o he linguocul u al mo i a ion o he p ecedence o p ope names
wi h he u he analysis o hei compliance wi h he c i e ia o p eceden
phenomena. As a esul o such ope a ional ac ions, a decision on he mo i e
will be p oposed. I se es as he sou ce o he u he c ea ion o quo a ions,
allusions, eminiscences as a new ype o knowledge and eady-made onymic
in e ex s.
ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
134 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII
mode n in e iconici y, he p agma ic po en ial o onymic in e cul u al signs
is de e mined no by hei meaning and place in p o ocul u e, bu by hei
well-known and e ec i e impac . In his case, he e ec o he impac is mo e
impo an han he meaning o he message. Mass cul u e exploi s only ha
pa o he seman ics o an in e cul u al sign ha is associa ed wi h a s e eo ype,
simpli ying complex and mul idimensional phenomena.
5. CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, we no e ha p ope names a e able o ac as p eceden
phenomena and subsequen ly gene a e in e ex ual meanings in hei olded
o m. Gaining wide popula i y in linguis ic cul u e, p eceden p ope names a e
o en used as componen s o in e ex s. To designa e his ype o in e ex s, a
new e m is p oposed – onymic in e ex , which is he ca ie o linguocul u al
in o ma ion, he o igins o which go back o a ious e en s and ac s, and he
sou ces – o li e a u e, my hology, eligion, and o he ex s.
The p eceden and in e ex ual na u e o p ope names ensu es hei
pa icipa ion in in e cul u al ans e , as a esul o which new meanings a ise
in he hos linguis ic cul u e. A he same ime, i is no so much he na ional
and cul u al speci ici y o he onymic in e ex as a sign o he o iginal linguis ic
cul u e ha is signi ican , bu he ajec o y o ex ac ing new in o ma ion om
he o igins and sou ces o he ecei ing linguis ic cul u e.
Howe e , as he analyzed da a ma e ial shows, o e ime, he linguis ic cul u e
in o ma ion o a p eceden p ope name may lose i s o me mo i a ional basis.
This leads o he o maliza ion o i s semio ics, he ac ualiza ion o in e iconici y
and he p agma ic impac on he ecipien o in o ma ion wi h he help o o m,
a he han seman ic con en .
REFERENCES
Amme Ch is ine, ed., 1997: The Ame ican He i age Dic iona y o Idioms, Bos on,
Massachuse s: Hough on Mi lin Ha cou .
Bahan Mi osla a P. 2014: Баган, Мирослава П. Заперечення як засіб
трансформації прецедентних феноменів [Zape ečennja jak zasib ans o maciji
p eceden nyx enomeni ]. – Українська мова [Uk ajinska mo a] 4, 44–51.
Be ezo ič Elena L. 2009: Березович, Елена Л. Русская топонимия в
этнолингвистическом аспекте: Пространство и человек [Russkaja oponimija

S aipsniai / A icles 135
P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e
è noling is ičeskom aspek e: P os ans o i čelo ek], Москва: Либроком [Mosk a:
Lib okom].
Bohuc’kij Vadim М. 2009: Богуцький, Вадим М. Топоніми як засіб презентації
явищ непросторової дійсності (на матеріалі українських, англійських, іспанських
паремій) [Toponimy jak zasib p ezen aciji ja išč nep os o o oji dijsnos i (na ma e iali
uk ajins’kix, anglijs’kix, ispans’kix pa emij)]. – Семантика мови і тексту: матеріали
Х Міжнародної конференції [Seman ika mo y i eks u: ma e ialy X Mižna odnoji
kon e enciji] 2, 32–35.
Če nja skaja Vale ija E. 2009: Чернявская, Валерия Е. Лингвистика текста:
Поликодовость, интертекстуальность, интердискурсивность [Ling is ika eks a:
Polikodo os ’, in e eks ual’nos ’, in e disku si nos ’], Москва: Либроком [Mosk a:
Lib okom].
De La on en Žan 2005: Дe Лафонтен, Жан. Третейский Судья, Брат Милосердия
и Пустынник [T e ejskij Sud’ja, B a Milose dija i Pus ynnik]. ‒ Басни [Basni], пер.
А. И. Введенский, ред. В. П. Бутромеев [pe . A. I. V edenskij, ed. V. P. Bu omee ],
Москва: Белый город [Mosk a: Belyj go od].
Deniso a Galina V. 2003: Денисова, Галина В. В мире интертекста: язык,
память, перевод [V mi e in e eks a: jazyk, pamja ’, pe e od], Москва: Азбуковник
[Mosk a: Azbuko nik].
F anko I an J. 1907: Франко, Іван Я. Галицькоруські народні приповідки
[Halic’ko us’ki na odni p ypo idky]. ‒ Етнографічний збірник [E nog a ičnyj
zbi nyk] 2(2), 301–612.
Gaspa o Bo is М. 1996: Гаспаров, Борис М. Язык. Память. Образ [Jazyk.
Pamja ’. Ob az], Москва: Новое литературное обозрение [Mosk a: No oe li e a u noe
oboz enie].
G igo ’e Vik o P. 2000: Григорьев, Виктор П. Принцип как заязыковой
интертекст [P incip kak zajazyko oj in e eks ]. ‒ Будетлянин [Bude ljanin], Москва:
Языки русской культуры [Mosk a: Jazyki usskoj kul’ u y], 578‒581.
Gudko Dmi ij B. 2003: Гудков, Дмитрий Б. Прецедентные феномены в
текстах политического дискурса [P eceden nye enomeny eks ax poli ičeskogo
disku sa]. ‒ Язык СМИ как объект междисциплинарного исследования [Jazyk SMI
kak ob’ek meždisciplina nogo issledo anija], Москва: Издательство МГУ [Mosk a:
Izda el’s o MGU]. A ailable a : h p://e a is .na od. u/ ex 12/09.h m#3_18.
Gudko Dmi ij B. 2003a: Гудков, Дмитрий Б. Теория и практика межкультурной
коммуникации [Teo ija i p ak ika mežkul’ u noj kommunikacii], Москва: Гнозис
[Mosk a: Gnozis].
ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
136 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII
Héois Au élie 2020: When P ope Names Become Ve bs: A Seman ic Pe spec i e. ‒
Lexis 16, 1‒35.
Ju ka Flo ina 2009: Li e a ische Onomas ik: Aspek e de li e a ischen Onomas ik am
Beispiel de Namengebung in J. W. on Goe hes „Wilhelm Meis e s Jah e“, No de s ed :
GRIN Ve lag.
Kal’čenko Te jana J. 2014: Кальченко, Тетяна Ю. Аксіологічна функція
прецедентних феноменів у поетичному творі (на матеріалі лірики В. Герасим’юка
та І. Римарука) [Aksiologična unkcija p eceden nyx enomeni u poe ičnomu o i (na
ma e iali li yki V. He asym’juka a I. Ryma uka)]. ‒ Наукові записки Бердянського
державного педагогічного університету. Філологічні науки [Nauko i zapiski
Be dians’kogo de ža nogo pedagogičnogo uni e si e u. Filologični nauky] 4, 75–80.
Ka penko Olena J. 2010: Карпенко, Олена Ю. Когнітивна ономастика
[Kogni i na onomas ika], Одеса: Феникс [Odesa: Fenyks].
Ka penko Olena J. 2015: Карпенко, Олена Ю. Когнітивна ономастика
[Kohni i na onomas ika]. ‒ Інтегральна теорія англомовної комунікації [In eh al’na
eo ija anglomo noji komunikaciji], 13–64.
Ko šo a Ma ija L. 2009: Ковшова, Мария Л. Семантика и прагматика
фразеологизмов (лингвокультурологический аспект) [Seman ika i p agma ika
azeologizmo (ling okul’ u ologičeskij aspek )]: диссертация доктора
филологических наук [disse acija dok o a ilolologičeskix nauk], Москва: Институт
языкознания РАН [Mosk a: Ins i u jazykoznanija RAN].
K is e a Julija 1995: Кристева, Юлия. Бахтин, cлово, диалог и роман [Bax in,
slo o, dialog i oman]. ‒ Вестник Московского университета. Серия: Филология
[Ves nik Mosko skogo uni e si e a. Se ija: Filologija] 1, 97–124.
Lo man Ju ij M. 2001: Лотман, Юрий M. Семиосфера [Semios e a], Санкт-
Петербург: Искусство [Sank -Pe e bu g: Iskuss o].
Naximo a Elena A. 2011: Нахимова, Елена А. Теория и методика когнитивно-
дискурсивного исследования прецедентных онимов в современной российской
массовой коммуникации [Teo ija i me odika kogni i no-disku si nogo issledo anija
p eceden nyx onimo so emennoj ossijskoj masso oj kommunikacii]: диссертация
доктора филологических наук [dise acija dok o a ilolologičeskix nauk],
Екатеринбург: Уральский федеральный университет] [Eka e inbu g: U al’skij
ede al’nyj uni e si e ].
Nomys Ma ij T., ukl., 1993: Номис, Матвій T., уклад. Українські приказки,
прислів’я і таке інше [Uk ajins’ki p ikazky, p ysli ’ja i ake inše], Київ: Либідь [Kyji :
Lybid’].
S aipsniai / A icles 137
P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e
P osku in Se gej G., P osku ina Alla V. 2017: Проскурин, Сергей Г.,
Проскурина, Алла В. Культурные трансферы и тексты [Kul’ u nye ans e y i
eks y], Новосибирск: ИПЦ НГУ [No osibi sk: IPC NGU].
Ri a e Majkl 1980: Риффатер, Майкл. Критерии стилистического анализа
[K i e ii s ilis ičeskogo analiza]. ‒ Новое в зарубежной лингвистике [No oe
za ubežnoj ling is ike] 9, 35–97.
Ru Ma ija È. 2001: Рут, Мария Э. Антропонимы: размышления о семантике
[An oponimy: azmyšlenija o seman ike]. ‒ Известия Уральского государственного
университета [Iz es ija U al’skogo gosuda s ennogo uni e si e a] 20, 45–50.
Ru Ma ija È. 2008: Рут, Мария Э. Образная номинация в русской ономастике
[Ob aznaja nominacija usskoj onomas ike], Москва: ЛКИ [Mosk a: LKI].
Rjabinina Olena K. 2007: Рябініна, Олена К. Інтертекстуальність у дискурсі
сучасної української преси: лінгвістичний аспект [In e eks ual’nis ’ u dysku si
sučasnoji uk ainskoji p esy: ling is ičnyj aspek ]: дисертація кандидата філологічних
наук [dise acija kandida a ilologičnyx nauk], Харків: Харківський національний
університет імені В. Н. Каразіна [Xa ki : Xa ki s’kij nacional’nyj uni e si e imeni
V. N. Ka azina].
Saxa uk Inna V. 2011: Сахарук, Інна В. Типологія прецедентних феноменів у
сучасному українському дискурсі [Tipolohija p eceden nyx enomeni u sučasnomu
uk ajins’komu disku si]. ‒ Лінгвістичні студії [Linh is yčni s udiji] 23, 197–203.
Slyškin Gennadij G. 2004: Слышкин, Геннадий Г. Лингвокультурные концепты
и метаконцепты [Ling okul’ u nye koncep y i me akoncep y], Волгоград: Перемена
[Volgog ad: Pe emena].
Soloduxo Èdua d M. 1982: Солодухо, Эдуард М. Проблемы интернационали-
зации фразеологии (на материале языков славянской, германской и романской групп)
[P oblemy in e nacionalizacii azeologii (na ma e iale jazyko sla janskoj, ge manskoj
i omanskoj g upp], Казань: Издательство Казанского университета [Kazan’:
Izda el’s o Kazanskogo uni e si e a].
Soloduxo Èdua d M. 1989: Солодухо, Эдуард М. Теория фразеологического
сближения (на материале языков славянской, германской и романской групп) [Teo ija
azeologičeskogo sbliženija (na ma e iale jazyko sla janskoj, ge manskoj i omanskoj
g upp)], Казань: Издательство Казанского университета [Kazan’: Izda el’s o
Kazanskogo uni e si e a].
S epano Ju ij S. 2001: Степанов, Юрий С. «Интертекст», «интернет»,
«интерсубъект» (к основаниям сравнительной концептологии) [“In e eks ”,
“in e ne ”, “in e subjek ” (k osno anijam s a ni el’noj koncep ologii)]. ‒ Известия
ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
138 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII
РАН. Серия литературы и языка [Iz es ija RAN. Se ija li e a u y i jazyka] 61(1),
3–11.
Tomaxin Gennadij D. 1988: Томахин, Геннадий Д. Реалии – американизмы.
Пособие по страноведению [Realii – ame ikanizmy. Posobie po s ano edeniju],
Москва: Высшая школа [Mosk a: Vysšaja škola].
Topo o Vladimi N. 1987: Топоров, Владимир Н. Заметки по реконструкции
текстов [Zame ki po ekons ukcii eks o ]. ‒ Исследования по структуре текстов
[Issledo anija po s uk u e eks o ], 99–100.
Vasko Roman, Ko olyо a Alla 2021: Julia K is e a’s In e ex uali y and
Hypo he ical Rela ionships o He Theo ies wi h Ancien Types o W i ing. ‒ Reliģiski-
ilozo iski aks i 29, 136–156.
Vaxelai e Jean-Louis 2016: De la dé ini ion linguis ique du nom p op e. ‒ Langue
F ançaise 190(2), 65‒78.
Volo a Vik o ija M. 2018: Волова, Виктория М. Стилеобразующий потенциал
имен собственных в англоязычном масс-медиальном дискурсе (на материале
публицистических текстов периодических изданий Великобритании и США)
[S ileob azujuščij po encial imen sobs ennyx anglojazyčnom mass-medial’nom
disku se (na ma e iale publicis ičeskix eks o pe iodičeskix izdanij Velikob i anii
i SŠA)]: диссертация кандидата филолологических наук [disse acija kandida a
ilolologičeskix nauk], Самарa: Самарский государственный социально-
педагогический университет [Sama a: Sama skij gosuda s ennyj social’no-
pedagogičeskij uni e si e ].
Za a yns’ka I ina F. 2022: Заваринська, Ірина Ф. Фразеологiзми з онімним
компонентом в англійській, польській та українській мовах: лінгвокультурологічний
аспект [F azeolohizmy z onimnym komponen om anglijs’kij, pol’s’kij a uk ajins’kij
mo ax: linh okul’ u olohičnyj aspek ], Тернопіль: Осадца Ю. В. [Te nopil’: Osadca
Ju. V.].
S aipsniai / A icles 139
P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e
P eceden iniai ik iniai a dai i jų
a pkul ū inis pe kėlimas
SANTRAUKA
S aipsnyje analizuojama p eceden inių ik inių a dų, kaip oniminių in e eks ų, ku ie
y a pi minės ling okul ū os ženklai-simboliai, pe kelian ys naujas eikšmes į p iimančias
kul ū as, a pkul ū inio pe kėlimo p oblema.
Daug dėmesio ski iama susijusių, be neiden iškų są okų, okių kaip p eceden iškumas,
ku is y a siejamas su kalbine s e eo ipo įkūnijimo o ma, šiuo a eju iš eiškiama ik iniu
a du, i in e eks ualumas, ku is s uk ū uoja iš į ai ių eks ų a einančią in o maciją, ko e-
liacijai. S aipsnyje nus a y as ik inio a do p eceden iškumo pi mumas pi minėje kul ū-
oje i an inis jo in e eks ualumo pobūdis.
S aipsnyje apib ėžiamas ik inių a dų p eceden iškumo kilmės i jų in e eks inės in-
o macijos šal inių aidmuo.
Iškeliama ši p ielaida: šiuolaikinė masinė kul ū a pasižymi ik inių a dų semio ikos o -
maliza imu, ikoniškumo ak ualiza imu i p agma ine o mos į aka in o macijos ad esa ui
iek pi minėje ling okul ū oje, iek a pkul ū inio pe kėlimo me u.
Į eik a 2022 m. ugsėjo 7 d.
ROMAN VASKO
Kyi Na ional Linguis ic Uni e si y
73, Velyka Vasylki ska S .
03150, Uk aine, Kyi
dnis e @uk .ne
ALLA KOROLYOVA
Kyi Na ional Linguis ic Uni e si y
73, Velyka Vasylki ska S .
03150, Uk aine, Kyi
alla.ko olyo [email protected]
TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA
Na ional Pedagogical D agomano Uni e si y
9, Py oho a S .
01601, Uk aine, Kyi
K eoma. [email p o ec ed]om