Precedent Proper Names and Their Intercultural Transfer

S aipsniai / A icles 119 ROMAN VASKO Kyi Na ional Linguis ic Uni e si y ORCID id: o cid.o g / 0000-0002-6499-2972 Fields o in e es : diach onic phonology o he Ge manic languages, linguis ic p ocesses o semio iza ion o p ima y ma e ial and spi i ual cul u e a i ac s, his o y o ancien ci iliza ions, his o y o Sume ian and Akkadian w i ing, in e cul u al communica ion, e c. ALLA KOROLYOVA Kyi Na ional Linguis ic Uni e si y ORCID id: o cid.o g / 0000-0001-5541-5914 Fields o in e es : linguis ic an h opology, linguo- and mac ocompa a i e s udies, Indo-Eu opean linguis ics, combina o ial seman ics, in e cul u al ans e . TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA Na ional Pedagogical D agomano Uni e si y ORCID id: o cid.o g/0000-0002-9535-9248 Fields o in e es : signi ican a e ac s, p eceden me apho s, heo y o concep ual in eg a ion, my honyms. DOI: doi.o g/10.35321/all87-06 PRECEDENT PROPER NAMES AND THEIR INTERCULTURAL TRANSFER P eceden iniai ik iniai a dai i jų a pkul ū inis pe kėlimas ANNOTATION The a icle deals wi h he p oblem o in e cul u al ans e o global and p eceden p ope names as educed in e ex s, which a e signs and symbols in an ou going cul u e ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA 120 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII and ansmi new senses in pe cei ing cul u es. As a gene al esea ch idea, we sugges dis inguishing he concep o in e cul u al ans e as a way o ansmi ing in o ma ion o a di e ence in ime, na u e, and in e cul u al communica ion. I in ol es he s udy o he speci ics o linguis ic phenomena in con ac ing cul u es o ensu e he e ec i eness o communica ion. Special a en ion is paid o he s udy o co ela ion o he ela ed bu no iden ical concep s – p eceden and in e ex ual. The i s is associa ed wi h he linguis ic o m o he embodimen o he s e eo ype in he o m o a p ope name, which is a conduc o o sou ce o ixing in o ma ion in a educed o m. The second one is cha ac e ized by he abili y o accumula e in o ma ion by e lec ing on eali y and ex ac ing i om o he ex s in a b oad sense. The p imacy o he p eceden o a p ope name in p o o-cul u e and he seconda y na u e o i s in e ex ual cha ac e wi h in ini e ep oducibili y o new senses ha e been es ablished. The o igin o p eceden p ope names and hei ole as linguocul u al sou ces and in e ex ual in o ma ion has been de e mined. Due o hei igu a i eness, he main ypes o p ope names a e ans o med in mode n mass cul u e, which con ibu es o he o maliza ion o he p ope names’ semio ics and ac ualiza ion o hei iconici y. The ul ima e goal o he p ope name’s o m is he p agma ic impac on he ecipien o he in o ma ion in he ini ial linguocul u e and in he p ocess o in e cul u al ans e . KEYWORDS: p eceden p ope names, in e cul u al ans e , in e ex uali y, educed in e ex , semio ics o p ope names, con ac ing linguocul u es. ANOTACIJA S aipsnyje analizuojama a p au inių i p eceden inių ik inių a dų, kaip edukuo ų in e eks ų, ku ie y a am ik os pi minės kul ū os ženklai i simboliai, pe duodan ys naujas p asmes p iimančioms kul ū oms, a pkul ū inio pe kėlimo p oblema. Pagal bend ąją y imo idėją, siūlome išski i a pkul ū inio pe kėlimo są oką kaip laiko, pobūdžio i a pkul ū inės komunikacijos p asme ski ingos in o macijos pe da imo būdą. Tai aip pa apima i kalbinių eiškinių speci iškumo y imą są eikaujančiose kul ū ose am, kad bū ų už ik in as komunikacijos e ek y umas. Daug dėmesio ski iama susijusių, be neiden iškų są okų – p eceden inis i in e eks ualus – ko eliacijai. Pi moji są oka y a susijusi su kalbine s e eo ipo įkūnijimo o ma, iš eiškiama ik iniu a du, ku i y a in o macijos už iksa imo edukuo a o ma laidininkas a šal inis. An oji są oka y a apib ėžiama kaip gebėjimas sukaup i in o maciją e lek uojan ealybę i su enkan ją iš ki ų eks ų plačiąja p asme. S aipsnyje nus a y as ik inio a do p eceden iškumo pi mumas pi minėje kul ū oje i an inis jo in e eks ualumo pobūdis su ne ibo a naujų p asmių kū imo galimybe. S aipsniai / A icles 121 P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e S aipsnyje nus a y a p eceden inių ik inių a dų kilmė i jų, kaip ling okul ū inių šal inių i in e eks inės in o macijos, aidmuo. Pag indinių ik inių a dų ipų aizdingumas leidžia juos ans o muo i šiuolaikinėje masinėje kul ū oje, o ai p isideda p ie ik inių a dų semio ikos o maliza imo i jų ikoniškumo ak ualiza imo. Galu inis ik inio a do o mos ikslas y a p agma inis in o macijos po eikis ad esa ui pi minėje ling okul ū oje i a pkul ū inio pe da imo p ocese. ESMINIAI ŽODŽIAI: p eceden iniai ik iniai a dai, a pkul ū inis pe kėlimas, in e eks ualumas, edukuo as in e eks as, ik inių a dų semio ika, są eikaujančios ling okul ū os. INTRODUCTION Cogni i e onomas ics (Ka penko 2010, 2015; Ju ka 2009) is one o he new b anches o cogni i e linguis ics. The main ask o cogni i e onomas ics is o de elop heo e ical undamen als and me hodological p ocedu es aimed a s udying he mechanisms o men aliza ion o p ope names/onyms (Héois 2020; Vaxelai e 2016) bo h in he indi idual and in he collec i e language consciousness o ep esen a i es o a ce ain linguis ic cul u e. I is he possession o backg ound knowledge ha is pa o he cogni i e base and has an in a ian cha ac e , i “allows he indi idual, acco ding o D. B. Gudko , o na iga e in he space o linguocul u e and comply wi h i s no ms and ules” (2003). The basis o such knowledge in he cogni i e base o linguocul u e is p eceden phenomena (Bahan 2014; Kal’čenko 2014; Saxa uk 2011, e c.). Wi hou going in o he his o y o he de elopmen o he heo y o he p eceden , we will b ie ly dwell only on hose poin s ha co espond o he classi ica ion o phenomena ela ed o he p eceden . A he same ime, we no e ha he me hodology o s udying hese phenomena began o be ac i ely de eloped only a he end o he 20 h – he beginning o he 21s cen u y. In ou opinion, he e m “p eceden ex ” was mos widely used. I apidly acqui ed a numbe o double s, including he iden i ie “p eceden ” in i s composi ion. And he mo e ac i ely his se ies was eplenished, he mo e clea ly he need o hei di e en ia ion ma u ed. O e ime, he e m “p eceden phenomenon” was p oposed as a hype nym o all hyponyms wi h he iden i ie “p eceden ”. The e iew o scien i ic li e a u e shows ha he ollowing hyponyms a e he mos common ones: 1) “p eceden ex ”, 2) “p eceden si ua ion”, 3) “p eceden s a emen ” and 4) “p eceden p ope name”. ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA 122 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII Recen ly, we ha e been wi nessing he app oba ion o he e m “p eceden wo ld”, o example, in he wo k o Genadij G. Slyškin’s Linguocul u al concep s and me aconcep s (2004: 154). The scien is de ines he p eceden wo ld as a se o indi idual p eceden phenomena (names, s a emen s, si ua ions), 1) ascending o a single sou ce, 2) pe cei ed by na i e speake s as in e connec ed, 3) egula ly upda ed in a ious combina ions wi h each o he (Slyškin 2004: 154). A he same ime, G. G. Slyškin belie es ha an appeal o p eceden wo lds makes i possible o con ey mo e complex cul u al meanings han an appeal o indi idual p eceden phenomena. Howe e , such a s a emen , in ou opinion, is no con incing enough, since each o he abo e ypes o p eceden phenomena (names, s a emen s, si ua ions) equally mee s he abo e h ee condi ions and con ibu es o he ansmission o a complex seman ic con en . To a gue ou poin o iew, we p esen he de ini ions a ailable in he scien i ic li e a u e o each o he ou hyponyms o p eceden phenomena, aking in o accoun ou co ec ion. A “p eceden ex ” is a complex sign amilia o a ep esen a i e o he linguocul u e, he appeal o which is o en esumed in he p ocess o communica ion wi h he help o s a emen s and symbols associa ed wi h his ex . A “p eceden si ua ion” is a kind o p o o ype si ua ion wi h conno a ions cha ac e is ic o i s s e eo ype. A “p eceden s a emen ” is a piece o speech con aining a well-known quo a ion. A “p eceden p ope name” is an indi idual name associa ed ei he wi h i s widely known quo a ions and e en en i e ex s ha ha e become p eceden o wi h si ua ions known o ep esen a i es o he linguocul u e. As o he p eceden p ope name, i is easy o see ha i s scien i ic scope is closely ela ed o he p e ious h ee ypes o p eceden phenomena. Le us jus poin ou he ac ha oday in he wo ks on onomas ics one can obse e he ac i a ion o a ious op ions o es ing he e m “p eceden p ope names”, such as “p eceden onyms” (Naximo a 2011), “p eceden oponyms” (Be ezo ič 2009), e c., wha we will alk abou below in he esea ch pa o he a icle and, in pa icula , ha he heo y o p ecedence is he ounda ion o he heo y o in e ex uali y. Thus, e u ning o he ques ion o he essence o he e m “p eceden wo ld” in he iew o G. G. Slyškin, he e is e e y eason o asse ha complex meanings do no ansla e o he ac ual p eceden phenomena, bu hose ha ha e acqui ed an in e ex ual s a us (bo h indi idually and in combina ion wi h each o he ). In connec ion wi h such a s a emen o he p oblem, he ques ion a ises: is e e y p ope name a p eceden ? The answe o his ques ion is ob ious i we conside ha he p ecedence o he onym is due o i s cogni i e-semio ic unc ion, and subsequen ly o he po en ial abili y o gene a e and ep oduce in e ex ual meanings in he space o he o iginal linguocul u e. I a p ope S aipsniai / A icles 123 P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e name mig a es o ano he linguocul u e, hen in he p ocess o ans e ing i s in e ex ual meanings, i acqui es an in e na ional, i.e. global, cha ac e . In he p ocess o ans e iza ion, he onyms o he o iginal linguocul u e unde go signi ican changes in he o m and meaning in he ecei ing cul u e up o hei eplacemen , bu a he same ime, hey do no lose hei in e ex ual links wi h he dono . Due o hese connec ions, in e na ionaliza ion o globaliza ion o onyms akes place. The scien i ic idea o mula ed in he a icle is ele an and p omising o he u he de elopmen o he heo e ical p o isions o mode n cogni i e onomas ics whose ep esen a i es (Ka penko 2015 and o he s), on he one hand, con ince us ha onyms ha e no only seman ics bu also concep ual ea u es and e en ame s uc u e, on he o he hand, special a en ion is paid o he disclosu e o hei meanings as p eceden phenomena o linguocul u e (Bahan 2014: 44‒45). P eceden phenomena a e able o play he ole o s e eo yping knowledge bo h wi hin he same linguocul u al space and in he p ocess o in e cul u al ans e . The pu pose o he a icle is o conside p ope names as p eceden phenomena o he o iginal linguocul u e and hei abili y o gene a e new meanings in he p ocess and as a esul o in e cul u al ans e in he ecei ing linguocul u es. The objec i es o he a icle: – o cla i y he ela ionship be ween he e ms “p ecedence” and “in e ex uali y”, “in e ex uali y” and “in e ex ”; – o in oduce he e m “onymic in e ex ” in o he scien i ic appa a us o cogni i e onomas ics; – o de elop a me hodological algo i hm o he analysis o he h ee phases o in e cul u al ans e o p eceden p ope names; – based on he examples o he analysis o p ope names, o e eal hei p eceden , in e ex ual and global na u e upda ed in he p ocess and as a esul o in e cul u al ans e ; – o ace new ends associa ed wi h he s age o o mal semio iza ion o p eceden p ope names. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF THE CONCEPTS OF PRECEDENCE, INTERTEXTUALITY AND INTERTEXT The p ocess o globaliza ion o all sphe es o li e in e e y socie y oday equi es a mo e ho ough s udy o he na ional and cul u al cha ac e is ics ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA 124 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII o in e cul u al communica ion, as well as he p ocess o knowledge ans e , he so-called “ ans e ” (P osku in, P osku ina 2017). Usually, wo ypes o in e cul u al ans e a e dis inguished: communica ion i sel and knowledge ans e . Communica ion is always ca ied ou in synch ony, in he same ime pe iod, and he ans e o knowledge in ol es an addi ional appeal o al eady accumula ed knowledge ela ed o di e en ime pe iods, e en s, e c. These s a emen s indica e ha bo h communica ion and knowledge ans e bo de on such phenomena as p eceden , which is based on he s e eo ype o ideas abou agmen s and objec s o he su ounding wo ld and hei e baliza ion in na ional linguocul u es, and in e ex uali y, which is p ima ily associa ed wi h he e lec ion o cul u al con ac s be ween gene a ions. In e ex uali y, acco ding o Ju ij M. Lo man, is a kind o “semio ic memo y o cul u e”, which is cha ac e ized no only by he accumula ion o new in o ma ion h ough he knowledge o agmen s o eali y bu also by he ajec o ies o i s ex ac ion om exis ing ex s (2001: 213). In his ega d, he emphasized (Lo man 2001: 213) ha “ he ex does no exis on i s own, bu i is necessa ily placed in his o ical, eal o condi ional con ex s […]; hus, he pe cep ion o he ex ou side his backg ound is no possible. Conside ing in e ex uali y as a key ool o he ans e o meanings, he o igins o which go back o agmen s o di e en imes, le us u n o he de ini ion o Vladimi N. Topo o , who called he ex as a kind o “diach onic ma ix” (Topo o 1987), in he cons uc ion o which ano he ex is highligh ed. The ma e ial embodimen o he p ocess o in e ex uali y is he in e ex con aining links wi h he dono ex and i s seman ic po en ial/ he so-called in a ian (Rjabinina 2007). One o he ypes o such in e ex in i s olded o m is a p ope name/onym. Being signs o p eceden ex s, p eceden si ua ions and p eceden s a emen s, p ope names gain popula i y in linguocul u e and, hus, become ac ualize s o new meanings in he s uc u e o eady-made in e ex s. In his case, hey al eady pe o m a cogni i e-semio ic unc ion as cul u ally mo i a ed ma ke s o signi ican e en s, ac s, and si ua ions, assigning a seconda y ole o he iden i ica ion unc ion, i.e. labels. In he p ocess o in e cul u al ans e , a p ope name independen ly as a olded in e ex ( o designa e i in he a icle we p opose a new e m onymic in e ex ) wi h al eady acqui ed symbolism and seman ic load in he ou going linguocul u e o as a componen o he in e ex in he ecei ing linguocul u e adia es new meanings and acqui es an in e na ional, so-called global, cha ac e due o i s o iginal p ecedence. The onymic in e ex , he e o e, is “a p oduc o he ans o ma ion o ano he ex ” (K is e a 1995: 99), which necessa ily goes h ough he s age o p ecedence in one o he con ac ing cul u es, which la e S aipsniai / A icles 125 P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e se es as a gene a o o new meanings in a gi en di ec ion and ime. In o he wo ds, i is a guideline o he p oduc ion o new meanings on he basis o a eady-made p eceden . Discussing he on ology o in e ex and linking i wi h he en i onmen o exis ence o cul u al concep s, Ju ij S. S epano (2001: 3) poin s ou ha “in e ex is only he i s language loo o he esul o he in e ac ion o ex s. The nex “ loo s” consis o un eadable cons uc s – concep s, images, ideas – “men al wo lds” o hei componen s. In o he wo ds, ac ing as ma ke s o p o o ex s a he language le el, in e ex ual inclusions a he cogni i e le el appeal o he cogni i e base o he c ea o s o meanings. In a b oad sense, in e ex is a complex sign o he o iginal linguocul u e and he equency ep oduc ion o ph ases (winged sayings, s a emen s o amous pe sonali ies, quo a ions, e c.) om he discou ses o a pa icula linguocul u e. We ind a simila de ini ion o in e ex in Galina V. Deniso a, who also de ines his cons uc as he esul o e e ing o signi ican e en s o cul u al ac s ha ha e become p eceden , as well as o quo es om amous pe sonali ies (2003: 77). On his occasion, Bo is M. Gaspa o w o e: “[...] language ac i i y is ca ied ou as a con inuous s eam o ci a ion, which is ex ac ed om he conglome a e o language memo y. This quo a ion und is illed wi h uni s o a ying deg ees o comple eness – communica i e agmen s ha a e s o ed in memo y as i s s a iona y pa s and wi h which he speake ope a es when c ea ing and in e p e ing meanings” (Gaspa o 1996: 14). Majkl Ri a e (1980) called in e ex an in a ian o a gi en s uc u al- seman ic model, he a ian s o which a e p ima ily cons uc ed in he o iginal linguocul u e wi hin he amewo k o codes cha ac e is ic o i . A he same ime, linguocul u e is conside ed a space o alue meanings c ea ed by i s ep esen a i es in he p ocess o hei pe cep ion o he wo ld, and i s codes as seconda y sign sys ems, whe e a ious ma e ial means a e used o hei e baliza ion (Ko šo a 2009: 241). The coded alue meaning o ms a sys em o linguocul u e codes and, in gene al, a language wo ld iew, which e lec s he wo ld iew o a pa icula socie y (Ibid.). As o onymic in e ex s, acco ding o ou p elimina y obse a ions, in hei igu a i e meaning, hey ep esen a ans e o a p eceden winged saying wi h an onymic componen o seman ics and i s inhe en linguocul u al in o ma ion o c ea e and ansla e a new in e ex ual meaning bo h wi hin he o iginal linguocul u e and in he con ac ing language wo ld iew. Rega ding he p esence o p eceden cha ac e is ics in winged sayings o ph aseological uni s in a b oad sense, he discussion is s ill ongoing. In his ega d, he a gumen s o Vik o P. G igo ’e (2000: 578‒580) a e o special in e es , because hey a e he well-known winged sayings ela ed o he so-called ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA 126 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII “ ans” ph aseology which a e a new g oup o candida es o in e ex s”. G igo ’e also no es ha “ he ime o he concep o ansna ional ph aseology may no ha e come ye , bu he p e equisi es o discussing i s in e ex ual code ha e al eady ma u ed” (2000: 578‒580). And i we ollow ou assump ions ha p ecedence is a cogni i e basis o c ea ing in e ex ual meanings, and aking in o accoun he abo e de ini ions o he ou ypes o p eceden phenomena, hen he answe is ob iously in a ou o he p eceden s a us o such a ype o onymic in e ex s as winged sayings. In addi ion, since mos o he winged sayings/ph ases e lec he s e eo ypes o na ional consciousness, hei p ecedence is an obliga o y p oposi ional phase o in e ex uali y. In he si ua ion wi h he p eceden p ope names o global na u e, i is in e ex uali y ha plays he ole o a ansla o o meanings ha ha e passed he es o ime and exis h oughou he li e o many peoples in he o m o a special anscul u al code. And i is no coincidence ha in e ex uali y is conside ed a b oadcas code o wo ld cul u e – a sys em o adi ional alues o humani y, bo h ma e ial and spi i ual (Vasko, Ko olyo a 2021). To sea ch o he ajec o ies o he eme gence o in e ex ual meanings on he cogni i e basis o p eceden p ope names and hei u he analysis wi h he econs uc ion o he p ima y con en in he o iginal linguocul u e and i s u he ans e o he ecei ing linguocul u es, a comp ehensi e me hodological app oach, and ele an me hods and echniques a e p oposed, which a e desc ibed in he nex pa ag aph. 2. METHODOLOGY OF STUDYING THE INTERCULTURAL TRANSFER OF PRECEDENT PROPER NAMES Using he e m in e cul u al communica ion, esea che s unde s and i as “ he p ocess o communica ion o language pe sonali ies who belong o di e en linguocul u al communi ies and demons a e di e ences […]” (Gudko 2003a: 51), while ep esen a i es o he heo y o in e cul u al ans e de elop me hods o analyzing in e e ences, hyb idiza ions, ans o ma ions ha mani es hemsel es when he meanings o bo h simul aneous and non- empo al phenomena o con ac ing cul u es come in o con ac . Based on he heo e ical p e equisi es o s udying he p ocesses and esul s o in e cul u al ans e , one should apply hose me hods and echniques ha a e aimed p ima ily a econs uc ing he ajec o ies o he “cul u al mo emen ” o meanings. S aipsniai / A icles 127 P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e Today, he discussion con inues abou he need o imp o e he me hodological p ocedu e o analyzing he ways o ans o ming hose concep ual meanings ha a ise when hey a e “impo ed” and “expo ed” om one cul u e o ano he since i is no so much he na ional-speci ic di e ences o a pa icula cul u e (which a e gi en special a en ion in he heo y o in e cul u al communica ion), bu a he many e ealed ajec o ies o mig a ion o meanings (which a e impo an o he heo y o in e cul u al ans e ). The aced di ec ions o he o ma ion o new meanings o p eceden p ope names in he ecei ing cul u es p ima ily e lec hei in e ex ual na u e, since hey a e he esul o a blending (combina ion) o agmen s con aining hese cul u ally signi ican phenomena al eady in he new linguocul u al space. A comp ehensi e me hodology o analyzing p eceden p ope names in he o iginal linguocul u e and gene a ing new in e ex ual meanings on hei cogni i e basis in he p ocess o hei ans e o he ecei ing linguocul u e includes se e al manda o y s eps using he in e p e i e-con ex ual me hod, he compa a i e me hod, he linguop agma ic me hod, and he componen analysis me hod. Le us p esen he me hodology de eloped by us o analyzing he ajec o ies o he eme gence o new in e ex ual meanings o p eceden p ope names in he p ocess o hei in e cul u al ans e . As i was no ed, he mechanism o pene a ion o a i ac s o one cul u e in o ano he is launched wi h he pa icipa ion o he so-called his o ical and cul u al “media o s” (o igins, sou ces) ha ans e knowledge/meaning/in o ma ion o ano he con ex o pe cep ion. Such in e media ies a e, acco ding o he gene alized ema ks o Elena L. Be ezo ič (2009), Ma ija È. Ru (2001; 2008), I ina F. Za a ins’ka (2022), sou ces o linguocul u al mo i a ion wi h hei p o o ypes, among which a special place is occupied by li e a y, ancien , eligious and biblical p ope names, which ha e become, in ou opinion, in e na ional p eceden phenomena in he p ocess o b oad ans e iza ion. Thei ans e o ano he cul u al sys em is a dynamic p ocess consis ing o h ee main phases: selec ion, ans e and ecep ion, which unde lie he p oposed me hodology o s udying p ecedence, in e ex uali y and in e na ionali y o p ope names. The i s s age is a phase o selec ion o a p eceden p ope name in he o iginal linguocul u e, which in ol es he econs uc ion o he sou ces and o igins o he linguocul u al mo i a ion o he p ecedence o p ope names wi h he u he analysis o hei compliance wi h he c i e ia o p eceden phenomena. As a esul o such ope a ional ac ions, a decision on he mo i e will be p oposed. I se es as he sou ce o he u he c ea ion o quo a ions, allusions, eminiscences as a new ype o knowledge and eady-made onymic in e ex s. ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA 134 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII mode n in e iconici y, he p agma ic po en ial o onymic in e cul u al signs is de e mined no by hei meaning and place in p o ocul u e, bu by hei well-known and e ec i e impac . In his case, he e ec o he impac is mo e impo an han he meaning o he message. Mass cul u e exploi s only ha pa o he seman ics o an in e cul u al sign ha is associa ed wi h a s e eo ype, simpli ying complex and mul idimensional phenomena. 5. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, we no e ha p ope names a e able o ac as p eceden phenomena and subsequen ly gene a e in e ex ual meanings in hei olded o m. Gaining wide popula i y in linguis ic cul u e, p eceden p ope names a e o en used as componen s o in e ex s. To designa e his ype o in e ex s, a new e m is p oposed – onymic in e ex , which is he ca ie o linguocul u al in o ma ion, he o igins o which go back o a ious e en s and ac s, and he sou ces – o li e a u e, my hology, eligion, and o he ex s. The p eceden and in e ex ual na u e o p ope names ensu es hei pa icipa ion in in e cul u al ans e , as a esul o which new meanings a ise in he hos linguis ic cul u e. A he same ime, i is no so much he na ional and cul u al speci ici y o he onymic in e ex as a sign o he o iginal linguis ic cul u e ha is signi ican , bu he ajec o y o ex ac ing new in o ma ion om he o igins and sou ces o he ecei ing linguis ic cul u e. Howe e , as he analyzed da a ma e ial shows, o e ime, he linguis ic cul u e in o ma ion o a p eceden p ope name may lose i s o me mo i a ional basis. This leads o he o maliza ion o i s semio ics, he ac ualiza ion o in e iconici y and he p agma ic impac on he ecipien o in o ma ion wi h he help o o m, a he han seman ic con en . REFERENCES Amme Ch is ine, ed., 1997: The Ame ican He i age Dic iona y o Idioms, Bos on, Massachuse s: Hough on Mi lin Ha cou . Bahan Mi osla a P. 2014: Баган, Мирослава П. Заперечення як засіб трансформації прецедентних феноменів [Zape ečennja jak zasib ans o maciji p eceden nyx enomeni ]. – Українська мова [Uk ajinska mo a] 4, 44–51. Be ezo ič Elena L. 2009: Березович, Елена Л. Русская топонимия в этнолингвистическом аспекте: Пространство и человек [Russkaja oponimija S aipsniai / A icles 135 P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e è noling is ičeskom aspek e: P os ans o i čelo ek], Москва: Либроком [Mosk a: Lib okom]. Bohuc’kij Vadim М. 2009: Богуцький, Вадим М. Топоніми як засіб презентації явищ непросторової дійсності (на матеріалі українських, англійських, іспанських паремій) [Toponimy jak zasib p ezen aciji ja išč nep os o o oji dijsnos i (na ma e iali uk ajins’kix, anglijs’kix, ispans’kix pa emij)]. – Семантика мови і тексту: матеріали Х Міжнародної конференції [Seman ika mo y i eks u: ma e ialy X Mižna odnoji kon e enciji] 2, 32–35. Če nja skaja Vale ija E. 2009: Чернявская, Валерия Е. Лингвистика текста: Поликодовость, интертекстуальность, интердискурсивность [Ling is ika eks a: Polikodo os ’, in e eks ual’nos ’, in e disku si nos ’], Москва: Либроком [Mosk a: Lib okom]. De La on en Žan 2005: Дe Лафонтен, Жан. Третейский Судья, Брат Милосердия и Пустынник [T e ejskij Sud’ja, B a Milose dija i Pus ynnik]. ‒ Басни [Basni], пер. А. И. Введенский, ред. В. П. Бутромеев [pe . A. I. V edenskij, ed. V. P. Bu omee ], Москва: Белый город [Mosk a: Belyj go od]. Deniso a Galina V. 2003: Денисова, Галина В. В мире интертекста: язык, память, перевод [V mi e in e eks a: jazyk, pamja ’, pe e od], Москва: Азбуковник [Mosk a: Azbuko nik]. F anko I an J. 1907: Франко, Іван Я. Галицькоруські народні приповідки [Halic’ko us’ki na odni p ypo idky]. ‒ Етнографічний збірник [E nog a ičnyj zbi nyk] 2(2), 301–612. Gaspa o Bo is М. 1996: Гаспаров, Борис М. Язык. Память. Образ [Jazyk. Pamja ’. Ob az], Москва: Новое литературное обозрение [Mosk a: No oe li e a u noe oboz enie]. G igo ’e Vik o P. 2000: Григорьев, Виктор П. Принцип как заязыковой интертекст [P incip kak zajazyko oj in e eks ]. ‒ Будетлянин [Bude ljanin], Москва: Языки русской культуры [Mosk a: Jazyki usskoj kul’ u y], 578‒581. Gudko Dmi ij B. 2003: Гудков, Дмитрий Б. Прецедентные феномены в текстах политического дискурса [P eceden nye enomeny eks ax poli ičeskogo disku sa]. ‒ Язык СМИ как объект междисциплинарного исследования [Jazyk SMI kak ob’ek meždisciplina nogo issledo anija], Москва: Издательство МГУ [Mosk a: Izda el’s o MGU]. A ailable a : h p://e a is .na od. u/ ex 12/09.h m#3_18. Gudko Dmi ij B. 2003a: Гудков, Дмитрий Б. Теория и практика межкультурной коммуникации [Teo ija i p ak ika mežkul’ u noj kommunikacii], Москва: Гнозис [Mosk a: Gnozis]. ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA 136 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII Héois Au élie 2020: When P ope Names Become Ve bs: A Seman ic Pe spec i e. ‒ Lexis 16, 1‒35. Ju ka Flo ina 2009: Li e a ische Onomas ik: Aspek e de li e a ischen Onomas ik am Beispiel de Namengebung in J. W. on Goe hes „Wilhelm Meis e s Jah e“, No de s ed : GRIN Ve lag. Kal’čenko Te jana J. 2014: Кальченко, Тетяна Ю. Аксіологічна функція прецедентних феноменів у поетичному творі (на матеріалі лірики В. Герасим’юка та І. Римарука) [Aksiologična unkcija p eceden nyx enomeni u poe ičnomu o i (na ma e iali li yki V. He asym’juka a I. Ryma uka)]. ‒ Наукові записки Бердянського державного педагогічного університету. Філологічні науки [Nauko i zapiski Be dians’kogo de ža nogo pedagogičnogo uni e si e u. Filologični nauky] 4, 75–80. Ka penko Olena J. 2010: Карпенко, Олена Ю. Когнітивна ономастика [Kogni i na onomas ika], Одеса: Феникс [Odesa: Fenyks]. Ka penko Olena J. 2015: Карпенко, Олена Ю. Когнітивна ономастика [Kohni i na onomas ika]. ‒ Інтегральна теорія англомовної комунікації [In eh al’na eo ija anglomo noji komunikaciji], 13–64. Ko šo a Ma ija L. 2009: Ковшова, Мария Л. Семантика и прагматика фразеологизмов (лингвокультурологический аспект) [Seman ika i p agma ika azeologizmo (ling okul’ u ologičeskij aspek )]: диссертация доктора филологических наук [disse acija dok o a ilolologičeskix nauk], Москва: Институт языкознания РАН [Mosk a: Ins i u jazykoznanija RAN]. K is e a Julija 1995: Кристева, Юлия. Бахтин, cлово, диалог и роман [Bax in, slo o, dialog i oman]. ‒ Вестник Московского университета. Серия: Филология [Ves nik Mosko skogo uni e si e a. Se ija: Filologija] 1, 97–124. Lo man Ju ij M. 2001: Лотман, Юрий M. Семиосфера [Semios e a], Санкт- Петербург: Искусство [Sank -Pe e bu g: Iskuss o]. Naximo a Elena A. 2011: Нахимова, Елена А. Теория и методика когнитивно- дискурсивного исследования прецедентных онимов в современной российской массовой коммуникации [Teo ija i me odika kogni i no-disku si nogo issledo anija p eceden nyx onimo so emennoj ossijskoj masso oj kommunikacii]: диссертация доктора филологических наук [dise acija dok o a ilolologičeskix nauk], Екатеринбург: Уральский федеральный университет] [Eka e inbu g: U al’skij ede al’nyj uni e si e ]. Nomys Ma ij T., ukl., 1993: Номис, Матвій T., уклад. Українські приказки, прислів’я і таке інше [Uk ajins’ki p ikazky, p ysli ’ja i ake inše], Київ: Либідь [Kyji : Lybid’]. S aipsniai / A icles 137 P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e P osku in Se gej G., P osku ina Alla V. 2017: Проскурин, Сергей Г., Проскурина, Алла В. Культурные трансферы и тексты [Kul’ u nye ans e y i eks y], Новосибирск: ИПЦ НГУ [No osibi sk: IPC NGU]. Ri a e Majkl 1980: Риффатер, Майкл. Критерии стилистического анализа [K i e ii s ilis ičeskogo analiza]. ‒ Новое в зарубежной лингвистике [No oe za ubežnoj ling is ike] 9, 35–97. Ru Ma ija È. 2001: Рут, Мария Э. Антропонимы: размышления о семантике [An oponimy: azmyšlenija o seman ike]. ‒ Известия Уральского государственного университета [Iz es ija U al’skogo gosuda s ennogo uni e si e a] 20, 45–50. Ru Ma ija È. 2008: Рут, Мария Э. Образная номинация в русской ономастике [Ob aznaja nominacija usskoj onomas ike], Москва: ЛКИ [Mosk a: LKI]. Rjabinina Olena K. 2007: Рябініна, Олена К. Інтертекстуальність у дискурсі сучасної української преси: лінгвістичний аспект [In e eks ual’nis ’ u dysku si sučasnoji uk ainskoji p esy: ling is ičnyj aspek ]: дисертація кандидата філологічних наук [dise acija kandida a ilologičnyx nauk], Харків: Харківський національний університет імені В. Н. Каразіна [Xa ki : Xa ki s’kij nacional’nyj uni e si e imeni V. N. Ka azina]. Saxa uk Inna V. 2011: Сахарук, Інна В. Типологія прецедентних феноменів у сучасному українському дискурсі [Tipolohija p eceden nyx enomeni u sučasnomu uk ajins’komu disku si]. ‒ Лінгвістичні студії [Linh is yčni s udiji] 23, 197–203. Slyškin Gennadij G. 2004: Слышкин, Геннадий Г. Лингвокультурные концепты и метаконцепты [Ling okul’ u nye koncep y i me akoncep y], Волгоград: Перемена [Volgog ad: Pe emena]. Soloduxo Èdua d M. 1982: Солодухо, Эдуард М. Проблемы интернационали- зации фразеологии (на материале языков славянской, германской и романской групп) [P oblemy in e nacionalizacii azeologii (na ma e iale jazyko sla janskoj, ge manskoj i omanskoj g upp], Казань: Издательство Казанского университета [Kazan’: Izda el’s o Kazanskogo uni e si e a]. Soloduxo Èdua d M. 1989: Солодухо, Эдуард М. Теория фразеологического сближения (на материале языков славянской, германской и романской групп) [Teo ija azeologičeskogo sbliženija (na ma e iale jazyko sla janskoj, ge manskoj i omanskoj g upp)], Казань: Издательство Казанского университета [Kazan’: Izda el’s o Kazanskogo uni e si e a]. S epano Ju ij S. 2001: Степанов, Юрий С. «Интертекст», «интернет», «интерсубъект» (к основаниям сравнительной концептологии) [“In e eks ”, “in e ne ”, “in e subjek ” (k osno anijam s a ni el’noj koncep ologii)]. ‒ Известия ROMAN VASKO, ALLA KOROLYOVA, TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA 138 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXVII РАН. Серия литературы и языка [Iz es ija RAN. Se ija li e a u y i jazyka] 61(1), 3–11. Tomaxin Gennadij D. 1988: Томахин, Геннадий Д. Реалии – американизмы. Пособие по страноведению [Realii – ame ikanizmy. Posobie po s ano edeniju], Москва: Высшая школа [Mosk a: Vysšaja škola]. Topo o Vladimi N. 1987: Топоров, Владимир Н. Заметки по реконструкции текстов [Zame ki po ekons ukcii eks o ]. ‒ Исследования по структуре текстов [Issledo anija po s uk u e eks o ], 99–100. Vasko Roman, Ko olyо a Alla 2021: Julia K is e a’s In e ex uali y and Hypo he ical Rela ionships o He Theo ies wi h Ancien Types o W i ing. ‒ Reliģiski- ilozo iski aks i 29, 136–156. Vaxelai e Jean-Louis 2016: De la dé ini ion linguis ique du nom p op e. ‒ Langue F ançaise 190(2), 65‒78. Volo a Vik o ija M. 2018: Волова, Виктория М. Стилеобразующий потенциал имен собственных в англоязычном масс-медиальном дискурсе (на материале публицистических текстов периодических изданий Великобритании и США) [S ileob azujuščij po encial imen sobs ennyx anglojazyčnom mass-medial’nom disku se (na ma e iale publicis ičeskix eks o pe iodičeskix izdanij Velikob i anii i SŠA)]: диссертация кандидата филолологических наук [disse acija kandida a ilolologičeskix nauk], Самарa: Самарский государственный социально- педагогический университет [Sama a: Sama skij gosuda s ennyj social’no- pedagogičeskij uni e si e ]. Za a yns’ka I ina F. 2022: Заваринська, Ірина Ф. Фразеологiзми з онімним компонентом в англійській, польській та українській мовах: лінгвокультурологічний аспект [F azeolohizmy z onimnym komponen om anglijs’kij, pol’s’kij a uk ajins’kij mo ax: linh okul’ u olohičnyj aspek ], Тернопіль: Осадца Ю. В. [Te nopil’: Osadca Ju. V.]. S aipsniai / A icles 139 P eceden P ope Names and Thei In e cul u al T ans e P eceden iniai ik iniai a dai i jų a pkul ū inis pe kėlimas SANTRAUKA S aipsnyje analizuojama p eceden inių ik inių a dų, kaip oniminių in e eks ų, ku ie y a pi minės ling okul ū os ženklai-simboliai, pe kelian ys naujas eikšmes į p iimančias kul ū as, a pkul ū inio pe kėlimo p oblema. Daug dėmesio ski iama susijusių, be neiden iškų są okų, okių kaip p eceden iškumas, ku is y a siejamas su kalbine s e eo ipo įkūnijimo o ma, šiuo a eju iš eiškiama ik iniu a du, i in e eks ualumas, ku is s uk ū uoja iš į ai ių eks ų a einančią in o maciją, ko e- liacijai. S aipsnyje nus a y as ik inio a do p eceden iškumo pi mumas pi minėje kul ū- oje i an inis jo in e eks ualumo pobūdis. S aipsnyje apib ėžiamas ik inių a dų p eceden iškumo kilmės i jų in e eks inės in- o macijos šal inių aidmuo. Iškeliama ši p ielaida: šiuolaikinė masinė kul ū a pasižymi ik inių a dų semio ikos o - maliza imu, ikoniškumo ak ualiza imu i p agma ine o mos į aka in o macijos ad esa ui iek pi minėje ling okul ū oje, iek a pkul ū inio pe kėlimo me u. Į eik a 2022 m. ugsėjo 7 d. ROMAN VASKO Kyi Na ional Linguis ic Uni e si y 73, Velyka Vasylki ska S . 03150, Uk aine, Kyi dnis e @uk .ne ALLA KOROLYOVA Kyi Na ional Linguis ic Uni e si y 73, Velyka Vasylki ska S . 03150, Uk aine, Kyi alla.ko olyo [email protected] TETIANA TOLCHEIEVA Na ional Pedagogical D agomano Uni e si y 9, Py oho a S . 01601, Uk aine, Kyi K eoma. [email p o ec ed]om