Elena Chiocche i Te minology
New Te mbase, New Con en s
Wo k in Sou h Ty ol: New
App oaches, 6 doi.o g/10.35321/ e m26-01
Te minology Wo k in Sou h Ty ol:
New App oaches, New Te mbase,
New Con en s
ElEna ChioCChE i
Ins i u e o Applied Linguis ics, Eu ac Resea ch
AbST ACT
The pape gi es an o e iew o he de elopmen o legal e minology wo k in Sou h
Ty ol. Wo king me hods ha e e ol ed. Mic o-compa ison be ween he I alian and he
Ge man-speaking sys ems (Aus ia, Ge many and Swi ze land) has become a hallma k o
ou e minology wo k. The online sys em bis o (h p://bis o.eu ac.edu/) has also been
enewed o accommoda e changing use needs, e.g. p o iding ad anced il e ing and a
eedback unc ion. A policy o g owing a en ion o a ge use s has led us o include
wo k on legal colloca ions. Fu he use eques s conce n domains like occupa ional
heal h and sa e y. This implies ea ing ele an echnical, medical and o he scien i ic
e minology. Doing his while emaining consis en wi h he me hods applied o legal
e minology poses a no able me hodological challenge. Keywo ds: legal e minology,
Sou h Ty ol, mic o-compa ison, bis o, legal colloca ions, e minology use needs.
ANoTACIjA
O a igo desc e e um esumo da aida de abalho da e minologia ju ídica no
Ti ol do Sul. Me odas são pa obulėję. Exclu i o e ec uados da á ea e minologia
abalhos de aožas i ališkos e okiškos (u ilizadas na Áus ia, Alemanha e
Schweica ijoje) sis emas de línguas compa a ion mic olygmeniu. Tendo em
con a as cin anças necessidades dos consumido es, eno ada in e ne sis ema
bis o (h p://bis o.eu ac.edu/), po exemplo, im a aplica obulesnė il a imo e
e o na i o yšio unção. Cada ez mais a enção p es ando a consumido es
di ecionados, e e inclui colocações do s i o di ei o. Já su ge necessidades dos
consumido es, elacionadas com as á eas de saúde e segu ança ocupacionais,
demos e-se p eciso oma e e minologias cien í icas écnicas, medicininas e
de ou as á eas. Is o ha moniza com os mé odos aplicados à e minologia do di ei o g ande desa io me odológico.
pala as essenciais: di ei os e minija, Sul Ti olis, compa ação mik olygmeniu, bis o,
di ei os s i ies kolokacijos, e minijos consumido es po eikiai.
7Te minologia | 2019 | 26
INTRODUCTIoN by building upon and condensing p e ious esea ch which
illus a es he wo king me hods adop ed o e a ime span o abou 25
he beginnings o e minology wo k in Sou h Ty ol (Maye 1997, 2000),
yea s (Sand ini 1998; Maganzi Gioeni dAngiò, alli 2010; Chiocche i, alli 2016;
Chioc che i e al. 2017, 2019; Chiocche i 2019) and he ools de eloped o
dissemina e esul s (S ei e e al. 2004; alli, And ea a 2018), he pape
aims o gi e an o e iew o he de elopmen o legal e minology wo k in
Sou h Ty ol since Wo ld Wa II.
Sou h Ty ol (Süd i ol Al o Adige) is a mul ilingual p o ince in No he n I aly, wi h abou 525,000 inhabi an s
(ASTAT 2018: 9). Two hi ds o he local popula ion a e speake s o a mino i y language: 70% ha e Ge man as
hei i s language while 4.5% a e Ladin1 na i e speake s (ASTAT 2018: 15). Today, bo h languages a e
o icially ecognised a local le el, albei o di e en deg ees and in a eas o di e en size. Ge man has
co-o icial s a us in he en i e P o ince (P esiden ial Dec ee No. 670/1972, A . 99100). A adminis ação
pública local and he judicia y são ob igados a o e ece seus se iços in he language p e e ed by he
ci izen and o publish legisla ion and o he o icial documen s in bo h I alian and Ge man. All public
employees mus p o e knowledge o hese wo languages by passing an exam which has ou di e en
le els and consis s o an o al and a w i en pa . The e a e schools o all deg ees wi h ei he I alian o
Ge man as a main medium o ins uc ion and he o he language augh as a second language. place names
a e sys ema ically bilingual (Pale mo, Woelk 2011: 301; Albe , Pale mo 2012: 291293). The Ladin language is
o icially ecognised in he alleys o Ga dena and badia in Sou h Ty ol. Ladin speake s a e en i led o use
hei na i e ongue wi h he local public adminis a ion in he wo alleys (e.g. he municipali ies) and wi h
p o incial o ices loca ed ou side he co e a ea, p o ided ha he la e mainly wo k in he in e es o
he Ladin communi y (e.g. he Ladin school boa d). ele an legisla ion is made a ailable also in he local
Ladin a ian o , a p o incial le el, al e na ely in one o 1 Ladin is an ancien hae o- omance language
spoken in i e alleys o he Dolomi es ha a e pa o h ee di e en p o inces in I aly: bolzano, T en o
and belluno. The e a e app oxima ely 30,000 speake s in he en i e a ea (Ve a 2005: 115). Abou 20,000 li e in
Sou h Ty ol (ASTAT 2018: 15), u he 8,000 in T en ino (Lanza ame 2014: 6) and he emaining ew in he
p o ince o belluno. In his pape we shall no deal wi h he his o y and language o he Ladin mino i y in
de ail. Fo mo e in o ma ion consul , o example, Pescos a 2010.
Elena Chiocche i Te minology Wo k in Sou h Ty ol: New App oaches, 8 he
New Te mbase, New Con en s
wo a ian s (Resolu ion o he P o incial Go e nmen No. 210/2003).
Empleados in he Ladin adminis a ion mus p o e he knowledge o all h ee
o icial languages o he ex en equi ed o hei speci ic posi ion. In Ladin
schools, I alian and Ge man a e equally used as a medium o ins uc ion and
al e na ed egula ly. Ladin is also augh o a ew hou s pe week (Ve a
2005: 120). place names in Ga dena and Badia a e ilingual in Ladin, Ge man and
I alian (Ve a 2005: 118). This b ie o e iew illus a es a si ua ion in which
he wo Sou h Ty olean mino i y communi ies enjoy a high deg ee o
p o ec ion and many essen ial igh s, de ini ely being he bes sa egua ded
mino i ies in I aly (Albe , Pale mo 2012: 290). Ye odays s a e is he esul o
decades o social, economic and poli ical s uggles, including e en e o is
a acks (Fo che , Pe e lini 2010: 338362). Sou h Ty ol had become pa o I aly
in 1919 a e Wo ld Wa I. Despi e all he p omises made a he ime by he
King o I aly, he ascis egime ha ook powe in 1922 sys ema ically
supp essed he Ge man p ess and place names, ully I alianised he school
sys em, he public adminis a ion and he judicia y, and basi273; Pescos a
2010: 366368). Ladin was delibe a ely conside ed a dialec o I alian (Pescos a
2010: 383).
cally o bade he use o Ge man in public (Fo che , Pe e lini 2010: 267–
Fi s mino i y igh s we e g an ed wi h he Pa is Peace T ea ies a e
Wo ld Wa II. Howe e , he ensuing Fi s S a u e o Au onomy
(Cons i u ional Law No. 5/1948), passed by he I alian epublic in 1948, le he
Sou h Ty olean mino i ies la gely unsa is ied. Some language igh s and
mino i y p o ec ion we e es ablished, such as Ge man language p ess and
schools and he possibili y o eaching some Ladin a elemen a y school
(Cons i u ional Law 5/1948, A . 15, 87). Ne e heless, he public
adminis a ion as well as he legisla i e and judicial powe s emained
la gamen e I alian-speaking and basically inaccessible o membe s o he
local mino i y communi ies (see Alcock 2001 o a mo e de ailed his o ical
accoun in English). In addi ion, he use o Ge man o legisla ion, cou
p oceedings and public adminis a ion emained a me e possibili y
(Cons i u ional Law 5/1948, A . 85), hus sca cely pu in p ac ice (Albe ,
Pale mo 2012: 293).
The si ua ion changed adically in 1972, when he New S a u e o
Au onomy (P esiden ial Dec ee No. 670/1972) was app o ed by he
Pa liamen in ome. F om ha momen on, he Sou h Ty olean
mino i ies ecei ed a g owing numbe o igh s and ample au onomy, including
9Te minologija | 2019 | 26 p ima y and seconda y legisla i e powe s in many
domains o adminis aneed o legal e minology. Due o space
ion, which lead o he cu en asse and, no su p isingly, o an inc eased
cons ain s, he ollowing Sec ions will concen a e on he e minological
de elopmen o Ge man bu no o Ladin in Sou h Ty ol.
1. THE BEGINNINGS OF TERMINOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT IN GERMAN
Legal language poses a speci ic e minological challenge in Sou h Ty ol.
Designa ing I alian legal concep s in Ge man equi es pa icula e o s e en
oday, o se e al easons. Fi s , in he pas , Ge man had ne e been used o
exp ess he I alian legal sys em and i s concep s; he e o e, no e e ence
e minology was a ailable (Coluccia 2000: 381). Segundo, po mui as décadas o
desen ol imen o de a Ge man legal e minology o he abo e-men ioned
pu pose was hampe ed bo h by he ascis ban on he Ge man language in
Sou h Ty ol and la e , un il he 1970s, by he ma ginalised s a us o he
mino i y language in he judicia y sys em and in adminis a ion. Thi d, he e
a e o he na ions in Eu ope whe e Ge man is an o icial language a na ional
o egional le el (Ammon e al. 2016: XXXIX). Howe e , due o he di e ences
be ween legal sys ems and he esul ing sys em-bound na u e o legal
concep s (de G oo 1999: 12), Aus ian, Ge man o Swiss e ms, o example,
canno simply be bo owed o exp ess he concep s o he I alian legal
sys em (Albe , Pale mo 2012: 300310; Chiocche i, Ralli 2016: 103105). An e iden
case in poin is he ede al o ganisa ion o Aus ia, Ge many and Swi ze land
ha is e lec ed in hei e minology. Such e ms a e la gely inadequa e o
designa e he mo e cen alised I alian o m o go e nmen . Un il hal a
cen u y ago, he de elopmen o Ge man legal e minology in Sou h Ty ol was
uncoo dina ed and no a ely ad-hoc. Mainly in he 1970s and 1980s, di e en
eams o local academics, lawye s and judges wo king in speci ic domains
joined e o s o ansla e he I alian legal codes pe aining o hei
espec i e ields o ac i i y om I alian in o Ge man. The esul ing pa allel
ex edi ions o he Ci il Code, C iminal P ocedu e Code, Insol ency Code, e c.
we e p in ed and dis ibu ed by a local publishing house (Zanon 2001: 178). In
he a e ma h o he New S a u e o Au onomy and due o he new s a us
o Ge man as coo icial language, many o he ex s, such as laws and
adminis a i e documen s o all kinds, we e ansla ed in o Ge man by public
o icials, cle ks
Elena Chiocche i Te minology Wo k in Sou h Ty ol: New App oaches, 1 0 and
New Te mbase, New Con en s
p o essional ansla o s o bo h in e nal and public use. eg e ably, all hese
e o s we e no di ec ed by a cen al o ice and lacked he necessa y
s a egic language and e minology planning. T ansla ions we e o en d a ed
on a needs basis o le o he (p i a e) ini ia i e o o ices, cle ks,
associa ions, e c. conce ned wi h speci ic opics (Maye 1997: 128; Pale mo,
P ös l 1997: 53; Woelk 2000: 213; Chiocche i e al. 25 2017: 8). As a consequence, he
same concep s o en ended up being designa ed by di e en e ms in Ge man
(Maye 1997: 128129; Sand ini 1998: 399 400; Zanon 2001: 178; Chiocche i e al. 2013: 261;
Chiocche i, alli 105 2016: 178; Chiocche i 2019: 178), c ea ing concu ing
designa ions, con usion and e minological unce ain y. Fo example, beni
e edi a i (p ope y belonging o a deceased pe sons es a e) was ende ed
E bscha sgü e in he ansla ed Ci il Code and Nachlassgü e o
Ve lassenscha sgü e in he Ci il P ocedu e Code.
When he New S a u e o Au onomy was app o ed in 1972, i was soon ealized
ha he implemen a ion o he new language p o isions needed o be based on
consis en , comple e and uni ocal legal e minology. I ook o e a decade o
u he uncon olled de elopmen be o e a dedica ed Te minology Commission
was es ablished by P esiden ial Dec ee 574/1988. The Te minology Commission
was se up in 1991 and consis ed o six expe s (bilingual judges, lawye s and
ansla o s). I s manda e was o o icially alida e legally binding couples o
I alian and Ge man e ms in he main subdomains o law (e.g. ci il law, c iminal
law, p ocedu al law, adminis a i e law, e c.). The Commissione s aim was o
de elop a consis en se o well- esea ched Ge man e ms designa ing he
mos impo an legal concep s o he I alian legal sys em, which had o be used
by he Sou h Ty olean legisla u e, judicia y and adminis a ion. These e ms
we e in ended as one- o-one co esponden s o he legal e minology in I alian
and as a means o os e ing legal ce ain y and educing e minological
a ia ion in Sou h Ty olean Ge man (Albe , Pale mo 2012: 977;298; Chiocche i e
al. 2013: 26626 2019: 176178)
Chiocche i, Ralli 2016: 105106).
The I alian and Ge man e m couples we e published p og essi ely in he
local o icial Gaze e in o m o pa allel lis s. F om he momen o hei
publica ion, he o icially s anda dised e minology became legally binding in
Sou h Ty ol. In abou 20 yea s o ac i i y, he Te minology Commission
managed o s anda dise app oxima ely 7,400 couples o e ms. The i s lis
was published in 1994, he las in 2012. In addi ion, u he

1Te minologija | 2019 | 26 I alian legal codes. The e minology con ained in
e minology was al eady a ailable in he pa allel ex edi ions o he main
hese ansla ions was ba ch s anda dised, b inging he amoun o
o icially alida ed e ms in Sou h Ty ol o an es ima ed numbe o 15,000
o 20,000 2017: (Chiocche i e al. 265; 2019: 187).
The Commissione s we e suppo ed in hei s anda disa ion wo k by a
eam o e minologis s and legal expe s a Eu ac esea ch (h p: www.
eu ac.edu://linguis ics) aking ca e o he p elimina y esea ch ac i i ies. The
in e disciplina y eam s a ed wo king wi h a sys ema ic and
domaino ien ed app oach by delimi ing e e y subdomain unde analysis and
acqui ing ele an sou ce ma e ial. F om he e hey ex ac ed, selec ed and
o de ed he mos impo an e ms wi hin he key subdomains o he I alian
legal sys em (e.g. c iminal law, amily law, labou law) in I alian. Then hey
collec ed exis ing Ge man designa ions o hese na ional legal concep s in
Sou h Ty olean ex s. De ini ions and con ex s o use om ele an and
au ho i a i e books o no ma i e ex s we e added, oge he wi h
in o ma ion on hei sou ces (Maye 1997: 126; Chiocche i e al. 2019: 177178).
These ully- ledged e minological en ies elabo a ed acco ding o
e minological p inciples and me hods (A n z e al. 2014: 211 219) se ed as a
basis o he decisions o he Te minology Commission ha o icially
alida ed one Sou h Ty olean designa ion o e e y legal concep ea ed. In
his way s anda disa ion wo k con ibu ed g ea ly o supp essing old
imp omp u o inco ec e ms and o educing e minological a ia ion in
Sou h Ty olean legal Ge man. Fo example, he s anda dised e m
E bscha sgü e is now he only designa ion used o ende beni e edi a i in
local legisla ion. The sys ema ic app oach allowed o c ea e a s ock o
cohe en Ge man e minology o he mos impo an domains o ac i i y o
he local legisla u e, ju isdic ion and adminis a ion.
2. NEW APPROACHES
The i s change in wo king app oach conce ns legal compa ison. This
me hod allows o compa e di e en legal sys ems agains each o he o
de ec simila i ies and di e ences. The compa ison can in ol e en i e legal
amilies and legal sys ems wi h ega d o hei gene al me hods and
app oaches o legal issues, legisla i e p ac ice, legal in e p e a ion,
ju isp udence, e c. (mac o-compa ison). I can also conce n speci ic
concep s o p oblems. In he la e case he me hod is e med
mic o-compa ison (Zweige , Kö z 1996: 45; Pomme 2006: 8485) and becomes ele an
Elena Chiocche i Te minology Wo k in Sou h Ty ol: New App oaches, 1 2 o
New Te mbase, New Con en s
e minology wo k in he domain o law (Sand ini 1996: 160166; 1997: 126127; Maye
de G oo 2002: 222; Chiocche i 2019: 180182). Mic o-compa ison pe mi e a
unde s and whe he wo designa ions belonging o di e en legal sys ems
e e o he same legal concep o no , i.e. o check whe he he ele an
cha ac e is ics o he gi en concep s coincide o o de ec impo an
concep ual disc epancies ( e e.g. Chiocche i, Ralli 2016: 107110 o examples).
Em elação a e minology wo k in Sou h Ty ol, applying mic o-compa ison
means looking o legal concep s in Aus ia, Ge many and Swi ze land ha
a e concep ually equi alen o he I alian legal concep s unde analysis and
which ha e a simila unc ion wi hin hei espec i e legal sys ems (Maye
2000: 299; Chiocche i, Ralli 10611 2016:1).
A he onse o e minological ac i i ies in Sou h Ty ol, i soon became clea
ha e minology wo k was no possible wi hou cas ing a look ac oss he
bo de . Sou h Ty ol has only o e 300,000 speake s o Ge man (ASTAT 2018: 9),
while he e a e almos 100,000,000 o he na i e speake s in Eu ope, mainly
esiding in Aus ia, Ge many and Swi ze land (bie e 2017: 22). In addi ion, Sou h
Ty ol has always main ained h i ing social, cul u al, comme cial and poli ical
con ac s wi h hese coun ies (Woelk 2000: 213214). Po an o, o a oid an
excessi e egionalisa ion o Sou h Ty olean Ge man and o os e
ansna ional communica ion wi h he o he Ge man-speaking a eas (Sand ini
1998: 408), conside ing he e minology used in he neighbou ing coun ies would
ha e been an ad an age. Also, on e y p ac ical e ms, he Te minology
Commission could adop wo s a egies o ill any e minological gaps: ei he
p oduce neologisms o bo ow o eign Ge man designa ions used o equi alen
concep s. This implied in oducing mic ocompa ison o concep s wi h
non-exis ing o inadequa e designa ions in Sou h Ty olean Ge man (Maye 1997:
129; 2000: 299). A i s , his a he labo ious and ime-consuming me hod (Maye
2000: 297) was applied spo adically o ill e minological gaps o p opose be e
i ing designa ions. No início do new millennium, howe e , an EU- inancing
allowed o ex end he me hod o a g owing numbe o concep s. o e he yea s,
legal compa ison became a undamen al p ac ice o ensu e a high deg ee o
e minological quali y in Sou h Ty ol (Maye 2000: 297), p ima ily by educing
imp omp u and o en li e al ansla ions om I alian and inadequa e Ge man
designa ions. Today, legal compa a ion be ween he I alian ma k o e minology
wo k a Eu ac esea ch (Chiocche i e al. 2019: 178).
legal sys em and he neighbou ing Ge man-speaking sys ems i is he hall-
1 3Te minologia | 2019 | 26
The second change in wo king app oach, abou a decade la e , was a shi
om a sys ema ic and basically s anda disa ion-o ien ed o a mo e
desc ip i e app oach, which also allows o ad-hoc and ex -o ien ed
e minology wo k. This ansi ion became necessa y when he ac i i ies o
he Te minology Commission we e discon inued in 2012 due o se e al
easons. All he Commissione s we e employed ull- ime in o he posi ions, so
ha hey could wo k on e minology issues only occasionally and
s anda disa ion wo k did no p oceed a high speed. In addi ion, only h ee
ou o six Commissione s we e na i e Ge man speake s. These h ee had a
highe wo kload han hei I alian-speaking colleagues, especially when
neology was necessa y. O p ocedimen o o mal pa a pad onização ainda mais
en a ou a i idades, po que as lis as alidadas pela Te minology Commission
p ecisa am se ap o adas po ambos o go e no local e o ep esen an e local
do go e no cen al an es sendo publicadas in he o icial Gaze e. This
mean a sys ema ic delay o six mon hs. o keep up wi h new legisla ion, he
The lack o ime and he leng hy p ocedu e in he end made i di icul
designa ion o new concep s and he necessa y e isions in case o legal
e o ms. Indeed, i happened ha p e iously s anda dised e ms became
ou da ed qui e soon. Finalmen e, se conside amos que he e minological
needs became u gen in 1972 when he
New S a u e o Au onomy was passed and ha he i s s anda disa ion
esul s we e published in 1994, a delay o o e 20 yea s becomes e iden . In he
mean ime, e minological de elopmen kep happening in an uncoo dina ed and
unplanned way, making subsequen s anda disa ion e en mo e challenging
(Chiocche i e al. 2017: 262263). Apesa de odos es es obs áculos, he
s anda disa ion e o s ha e p o ided a ai amoun o es ablished
e minology in se e al subdomains o law and mos impo an ly d awn
a en ion o he quali y o language, ansla ion and e minology as well as o
he exis ing e minological eposi o ies. No all s anda dised e ms we e
accep ed by he use s, e minological a ia ion s ill exis s and he e emain
se e al domains which would need some sys ema ic e minology wo k (e.g. ax
law). Tal abalho sis emá ico é s ill done when new domains a e explo ed, bu a
no able sha e o he e minological ac i i ies a Eu ac esea ch oday a e
ex - ela ed ( o example, when new legisla ion is passed on impo an opics)
and ad-hoc ( o example, when new concep s become ele an o speci ic
eques s a e pos ed). In addi ion, he exis ing s ock o e minology is
egula ly checked
Elena Chiocche i Te minology Wo k in Sou h Ty ol: New App oaches, 1 4 and, i
New Te mbase, New Con en s
necessa y, upda ed. Today, main enance and upda ing a e essen ial s eps o
p ese e he quali y and eliabili y o any e minological esou ce o i s end
use s (D ewe , Schmi z 2017: 37; Zanola 2018: 77). S anda disa ion wo k was
always based on essen ially desc ip i e e minological en ies. Wi h he las
no ma i e s ep being abandoned, he desc ip i e app oach emained in place.
Além disso, desde que i is now easie o dissemina e e minology widely (e.g. ia
he In e ne ) and he aim o e minology wo k oday is no jus de eloping
Sou h Ty olean legal language anymo e, bu acili a ing and os e ing
ansna ional communica ion, s anda disa ion is no needed wi h he same
u gency as be o e. When he e a e s ill doub s on which e m, among a se o
wo o mo e concu ing ones, should be used in Sou h Ty ol, he e minologis s
a Eu ac esea ch consul wi h he o ice o Language Issues, which is
esponsible o he ansla ion and e ision o local legisla ion, and wi h domain
expe s, so ha a join ecommenda ion may be gi en. Howe e , his
ecommenda ion is in no way legally binding and he use s emain ee o choose
based on he in o ma ion made a ailable in he e minological en ies. The hi d
and las change in wo king app oach conce ns coope a ion wi h end-use s. In
he 1990s, he mos u gen domains had been selec ed on a needs basis,
a ou ing he subdomains ha we e mo e ele an o he Sou h Ty olean
public adminis a ion and he judicia y, while essen ially lea ing ou some
o he s such as, o example, ma i ime law and chu ch law. Nas úl imas ês
décadas o go e no local adqui iu adicionais p imá ios e secundá ios pode es
legisla i os and some subdomains ha e gained ele ance, o example
occupa ional heal h and sa e y. Consequen emen e, he cu en app oach o
e minology wo k is e y ocused on he needs exp essed by he end use s. Po
exemplo, he eques o e minology wo k in he domain o occupa ional heal h
and sa e y was oiced by he esponsible o ices wi hin he local
adminis a ion. Te minology wo k on li ing wills was igge ed by a new law
app o ed in 2017 in I aly. Vá ios ad-hoc eques s we e pos ed by o he local
public o p i a e o ganisa ions, e.g. he Cou o Audi o s, he Cus oms Agency
and p i a e use s o associa ions. Esses pedidos são analisados, answe ed and
he esul s a e made a ailable o he gene al public.
Paying g ea e a en ion o he eal needs o use s allows he
e minology wo k a Eu ac esea ch o be ocused on cu en opics and,
same ime, o dissemina e wo k mo e easily among speci ic p o essional
a he communi ies. Wo king on p esen -day legisla ion and deba ed opics as
2 1Te minologia | 2019 | 26
LeGaL eFe enCes
Cons i u ional Law No. 5/1948 (Fi s S a u e o Au onomy). Legge cos i uzionale del 26 ebb aio 1948, n. 5
S a u o speciale pe il T en ino - Al o Adige. A ailable a :
h pwww.consiglio-bz.o g/download/1.S a u o-di-Au onomia-1948.pd [accessado em 19.08.2019]. P esiden ial
Dec ee No 670/1972 (New S a u e o Au onomy). Dec e o del P esiden e della Repubblica del 31 agos o 1972, n. 670
App o azione del es o unico delle leggi cos i uzionali conce nen i lo S a u o speciale pe il T en ino Al o
Adige. A ailable a :
h plexb owse .p o inz.bz.i /doci /dp -1972-670/dec e o_del_p esiden e_della_ epublica_31_agos o_1972_n_670.as-
px [accessed 19.08.2019]. Dec e o P esidencial No 574/1988. Dec e o del P esiden e della Repubblica del 15 luglio
1988, n. 574 No me di a uazione dello S a u o speciale pe la egione T en ino Al o Adige in ma e ia di uso della
lingua edesca e della lingua ladina nei appo i con la pubblica amminis azione e nei p ocedimen i giudizia i.
A ailable a :
h plexb owse .p o inz.bz.i /doci ://dp -1988-57/dec e o_del_p esiden e_della_ epublica_15_ab il_1988_n_574.aspx [accessed 19.08.2019].
Resolu ion No. 210-2003 by he P o incial Go e nmen o Sou h Ty ol. Delibe a della Giun a P o inciale del
27 gennaio 2003, n. 210 U ilizzo della lingua ladina da pa e degli en i pubblici e negli a i no ma i i. A ailable
a : h plexb owse .p o inz.bz.i /doc-20141121/i -1571/delibe a_n_210_del_27_01_2003.aspx
[accessado 19.08.2019].
eFe enCes
Albe E., Pale mo F. 2012: C ea ing, S udying and Expe imen ing wi h Bilingual Law in Sou h Ty ol: Los
in In e p e a ion? – Bilingual Highe Educa ion in he Legal Con ex . G oup Righ s, S a e Policies and Glo-
balisa ion. X. A zoz (ed.), Leiden: Nijho , 287–309.
Alcock A. 2001: The Sou h Ty ol Au onomy. A Sho In oduc ion, Londonde y / bolzano: Au onomous
P o ince o Bolzano / Bozen.
Ammon U., bickel H., Lenz A. N. (eds.) 2014: Va ian enwö e buch des Deu schen. Die S anda dsp ache in
Ös e eich, de Schweiz, Deu schland, Liech ens ein, Luxembu g, Os belgien und Süd i ol sowie Rumänien,
Namibia und Mennoni ensiedlungen, be lin: De G uy e .
A n z R., Pich H., Schmi z K.-D. 2014: Ein üh ung in die Te minologiea bei . 7 h ed., Hildesheim: olms.
ASTAT – Landesins i u ü S a is ik / Is i u o p o inciale di s a is ica 2018: Süd i ol in Zahlen/Al o Adige
in ci e, bolzano / bozen: ASTAT.
bie e b. U. 2017: Ein Eu opa – Viele Sp achen: Meh sp achigkei in Eu opa, b ey: Mykum.
bis o – In o ma ion Sys em o Legal Te minology, bolzano: Ins i u e o Applied Linguis ics o Eu ac ese-
a ch. A ailable a : h p://bis o.eu ac.edu/ [accessed 19.08.2019].
Chiocche i E. 2019: Legal Compa ison in Te minology Wo k: De eloping he Sou h Ty olean Ge man Le-
gal Language. – Diszciplínák alálkozása: nyel i köz e í és a XXI. Században. S. Szo ák (ed.), budapes :
OFFI, 175–185.
Chiocche i E., Ralli N. 2016: Ein Beg i , zwei Sp achen, un e schiedliche (Rech s)Kul u en. – Te minologie
und Kul u . Ak en des Symposions, Mannheim, 3.–5. Mä z. P. D ewe , F. Maye , K.-D. Schmi z (eds.),
Munich e al.: Deu sche Te minologie-Tag e.V., 103–112.
Chiocche i E., K anebi e K., alli N., S anizzi I. 2019: 25 jah e bozne Me hode: Te minologiea bei in
Süd i ol. – Te minologie: Epochen, Schwe punk e, Umse zungen. Zum 25-jäh igen Bes ehen des Ra s ü
deu schsp achige Te minologie. P. D ewe , D. Puli ano (eds.), Be lin: Sp inge Vieweg, 175–191.
Chiocche i E., K anebi e K., alli N., S anizzi I. 2013: Deu sch is nich gleich Deu sch. Eine e minolo-
gische Analyse zu den Besonde hei en de deu schen Rech ssp ache in Süd i ol. – Dia opische Va ia ion
in de deu schen Rech ssp ache. M. M. b ambilla, j. Ge des, C. Messina (eds.), be lin: F ank, Timme,
253–285.
Chiocche i E., Ralli N., S anizzi I. 2017: F om DIY T ansla ions o O icial S anda diza ion and Back
Again? 50 Yea s o Expe ience wi h I alian and Ge man Legal Te minology Wo k in Sou h Ty ol. –
Te minological App oaches in he Eu opean Con ex . P. Faini (ed.), Camb idge: Camb idge Schola s,
254–270.
Coluccia S. 2000: Il linguaggio giu idico in Al o Adige. – Heima . Iden i à egionali nel p ocesso s o ico.
An onio Pasina o (ed.), Rome: Donzelli, 379–388.
De G oo G.-R. 1999: Das Übe se zen ju is ische Te minologie. – Rech und Übe se zen. G.- . de G oo ,
R. Schulze (eds.), Baden Baden: Nomos, 11–46.

Elena Chiocche i Te minology Wo k in Sou h Ty ol: New App oaches,
New Te mbase, New Con en s
2 2
De G oo G.-R. 2002: Rech s e gleichung als Ke n ä igkei bei de Übe se zung ju is ische Te minologie. –
Sp ache und Rech . U. Haß-Zumkeh (ed.), Be lin: De G uy e , 222–239.
Depu a i PD 2016: La legge sulle unioni ci ili. Dossie n. 145. A ailable a : h p://www.depu a ipd.i / iles/do-
cumen i/145_La_legge_sulle_unioni_ci ili_(1).pd [accessed 19.08.2019].
D ewe P., Schmi z K.-D. 2017: Te minologiemanagemen . G undlagen – Me hoden – We kzeuge, be lin: Sp in-
ge Vieweg.
Eu ac Resea ch – Ins i u e o Applied Linguis ics. A ailable a : h p://www.eu ac.edu/linguis ics [accessed
19.08.2019].
Fo che M., Pe e lini H. K. 2010: Süd i ol in Geschich e und Gegenwa , Innsb uck: Haymon.
Fo ge P. 2014: La ph aséologie chez les ju ilexicog aphes: les exemples linguis iques dans da deuxième
edi ion du Dic ionnai e de d oi p i é e lexiques bilingues. – Legal Lexicog aphy. A Compa a i e Pe spec i e.
M. M. Aodha (ed.), Abingdon: Rou ledge, 223–264.
Gampe J., Dongilli P. 1999: P ima y da a encoding o a bilingual co pus. – Sammelband de Jah es agung
de GLDV 99. J. Gippe (H sg.), P ague: Enigma, 323–331.
G ass T. 2014: P incipes e minologiques pou la cons i u ion d’une base de données pou la aduc ion ju i-
dique. – Legal Lexicog aphy. A Compa a i e Pe spec i e. M. M. Aodha (ed.), Abingdon: Rou ledge, 103–114.
Heid U., Gows R. H. 2006: A Model o a Mul i unc ional Dic iona y o Colloca ions. – P oceedings o he
XII EURALEX In e na ional Cong ess (Tu in, 6–9 Sep embe 2006), Vol. 1. E. Co ino, C. Ma ello,
C. Ones i (eds.), Alessand ia: Dell’O so, 979–988.
Holde baum A., P ien M. 2004: Kolloka ionen im Web: Zu He lei ung eine zweisp achig ausgea bei e en
Kolloka ionsda enbank. – AREAS 26, 451–472. A ailable a : h p://a eas.iued.uni-heidelbe g.de/a ikel/
band26.pd [accessed 19.08.2019].
Lanza ame F. 2014: Rile azione sulla consis enza e la dislocazione e i o iale degli appa enen i alle popolazioni
di lingua ladina, mòchena e cimb a (15° Censimen o gene ale della popolazione e delle abi azioni – da i de ini-
i i), T en o: Se izio s a is ica della P o incia Au onoma di T en o. A ailable a : h p://www.s a is ica.
p o incia. n.i /bina y/pa _s a is ica_new/popolazione/Rile azionePopolazioniLadinaMochenaCim-
b a.1394031752.pd [accessed 19.08.2019].
Le a P. 2014: Pou des dic ionnai es ju idiques mul ilingues du ci oyen de l’union eu opéenne. – Legal
Lexicog aphy. A Compa a i e Pe spec i e. M. M. Aodha (ed.), Abingdon: Rou ledge, 89–102.
Maganzi Gioeni D’Angiò F., alli N. 2010: Da a modeling delle collocazioni: a e minologia e lessicog a-
ia. – Fachsp achen in de wel wei en Kommunika ion / Specialized Language in Global Communica ion. Ak-
en des XVI Eu opäischen Fachsp achensymposiums, Hambu g 2007 / P oceedings o he XVI h Eu opean
Symposium on Language o Special Pu poses (LSP), Hambu g (Ge many) 2007. W. on Hahn, C. Ve an
(eds.), F ank u a. M.: Pe e Lang, 99–106.
Maye F. 1997: Te minologiea bei in Süd i ol. – Te minologie e T aduc ion. W. os e held (ed.), Luxem-
bou g: O ice des publica ions o icielles, 124–137.
Maye F. 2000: Te minog aphie im Rech : P obleme und G enzen de Bozne Me hode. – Rech slinguis ik
des Deu schen und I alienischen. D. Ve onesi (ed.), Pado a: UNIPRESS, 295–306.
Pale mo F., P ös l E. M. 1997: No mazione linguis ica e u ela mino i a ia / Minde hei enschu z du ch Sp ach-
no mie ung, bolzano / bozen: Accademia Eu opea di bolzano / Eu opäische Akademie bozen.
Pale mo F., Woelk J. 2011: Di i o cos i uzionale compa a o dei g uppi e delle mino anze, 2nd ed. Pado a:
CEDAM.
Pescos a W. 2010: S o ia dei ladini delle Dolomi i, San Ma in de To : Is i u Ladin Micu à de Rü.
Pomme S. 2006: Rech sübe se zung und Rech s e gleichung, F ank u a. M.: Pe e Lang.
alli N., And ea a N. 2018: bis o – ein Tool ü meh sp achige Rech s e minologie. – ans-kom. Zei -
sch i ü T ansla ionswissenscha und Fachkommunika ion 11, 1, 7–44.
Sand ini P. 1996: Te minologiea bei im Rech . Desk ip i e beg i so ien ie e Ansa z om S andpunk des
Übe se ze s, Vienna: Te mne .
Sand ini P. 1998: I alienisches Rech in deu sche Sp ache – Te minologische Übe legungen. – I alienisch
und Deu sch im Kon ak und Ve gleich: Ak en des 7. T e ens de I alienischen und ös e eichischen Linguis en
(17–19 Oc obe 1996, Innsb uck, Aus ia). P. Co din, M. Iliescu, H. Sille -Runggaldie (eds.), T en o:
Uni e si à di T en o, 399–417.
S ei e O., Ralli N., Ties I., Vol me L. 2004: BISTRO, he Online Pla o m o Te minology Managemen :
S uc u ing Te minology wi hou En y S uc u es. – Linguis ica An e piensia, New Se ies – Themes in
T ansla ion S udies 3, 203–215.
2 3Te minologija | 2019 | 26
Ve a R. 2005: L’insegnamen o ilingue nelle locali à ladine della P o incia di Bolzano. – In e na ional
Jou nal o he Sociology o Language 171, 115–131.
Woelk J. 2000: Von „Ad oka “ bis „Zen aldi ek ion de Au onomien“. Die Süd i ole Rech ssp ache aus
Sich eines „bundesdeu schen“ Ju is en. – Rech slinguis ik des Deu schen und I alienischen. D. Ve onesi
(ed.), Pado a: UNIPRESS, 209–222.
Zanola M. T. 2018: Che cos’è la e minologia, ome: Ca occi.
Zanon H. 2001: Spu ensuche 1999: Die deu sche Sp ache bei Ge ich in Süd i ol. – Die deu sche Sp ache in
Süd i ol. Einhei ssp ache und egionale Viel al . K. Egge , F. Lan hale (eds.), Vienna / Bolzano: Folio,
168–186.
Zweige K., Kö z H. 1996: Ein üh ung in die Rech s e gleichung. 3 d ed., Tübingen: Moh Siebeck.
Te minoLoGijos da bas PieTų Ti oLyje: nauji Požiū iai, nauja Te minų bazė, naujas Tu inys
San auka
S aipsnyje ap ašoma eisės e minologijos da bo aida Pie ų Ti olyje nuo An ojo
pasaulinio ka o laikų iki šių dienų. Pie ų Ti olis y a daugiakalbė Šiau ės I alijos p o in-
cija, ku ioje kaip mažumų kalbos y a į eisin os okiečių kalba i ladinų kalba. Daugiau-
sia dėmesio ski iama okiškos e minijos a kybai, a skleidžiami me odų i požiū ių
pokyčiai. Sis eminį, į s anda iza imą o ien uo ą požiū į neseniai pakei ė labiau ap ašo-
mojo pobūdžio me odas, suda an is sąlygas specialesnei, į eks ą o ien uo ai e minolo-
gijai. Esmine Eu ac Resea ch a liekamų e minologijos s i ies da bų me odologine ypa-
ybe y a apęs i ališkos i okiškos (naudojamos Aus ijoje, Vokie ijoje, Š eica ijoje)
kalbų sis emų lyginimas mik olygmeniu. In e ne e pa eikiamoje eisės e minijos in o -
macinėje sis emoje (h p://bis o.eu ac.edu/) kiek ienas e minas p iski iamas ienai a
kelioms konk ečioms eisės sis emoms i aip pa odomas sis eminis eisės e minijos
pobūdis. Ku ian Pie ų Ti olio okiečių kalbos e miniją, oks sis emiškumas padeda iš-
eng i pe didelio ie inės eisės kalbos egioniškumo, nes kai ik galimi p iim ini a i-
ik menys užsienio kalba, e minai gali bū i adap uojami i a ojami Pie ų Ti olyje. Ša-
lims bend ada biaujan i p ekiaujan , ai ge ina a p als ybinius I alijos i okiškai kal-
bančių šalių san ykius. Siekian enkin i ikslinių a o ojų po eikius i eikala imus,
2016 m. sis ema bis o bu o iš esmės a naujin a. Daba inė apima eisines kolokacijas,
obulesnes il a imo unkcijas, išplės inį kon eks ą, p ieigą p ie isos bibliog a inės in-
o macijos, g įž amojo yšio unkciją. Va o ojų pageida imu į aukiama naujų s ičių,
pa yzdžiui, p o esinė s eika a i sauga, o ai kelia nemažų me odologinių iššūkių. Kad
e minologijos da bai i oliau u ė ų e ę, jie u i bū i aikomi p ie eisinių, echnolo-
ginių i isuomenės pokyčių. Taikomieji me odai, p iemonės i u inys u i a i ik i kin-
ančius ikslinių a o ojų g upių po eikius, ska in i e minijos sklaidą.
Reciba 2019-08-19
Elena Chiocche i
Eu ac esea ch
Ins i u e o Applied Linguis ics
Viale D uso 1, I-39100 Bolzano
E-mail elena.chiocche i@eu ac.edu