5 9Te minologija | 2017 | 24
P agma ics o de eloping
a e minological glossa y: UNESCO’s
In e ne Go e nance Glossa y
BLANCA STELLA GIRALDO PEREZ
In o e m (In e na ional In o ma ion Cen e o Te minology)
KEYWORDS: e minological glossa y, specialised communica ion, digi al di ide, In e ne
Go e nance Glossa y (IGG) me hodology, e minological p inciples and me hods, con en
1. BACKGROUND FOR THE INTERNET
GOVERNANCE GLOSSARY DEVELOPMENT
The swi de elopmen o in o ma ion and communica ion echnologies
(ICTs), he g owing knowledge socie ies and he poli ical aim o educe
digi al di ides o all so s a e issues high on he agenda o decision mak-
e s in indus y, public adminis a ion and academia. To imp o e he e -
iciency and e ec i eness o specialised communica ion and knowledge
sha ing, he upg ading o exis ing me hods and concep ions o new me h-
ods and applica ion o ools a e needed. The e a e se e al p oposals o
de eloping knowledge ools ha con ibu e o he c ea ion o sui able
con en ha can be eused, e-pu posed and en iched while os e ing
in e ope abili y and sus ainabili y. Glossa ies p ope ly de eloped a e basic
ools o le e age he e iciency and e ec i eness o specialised communi-
ca ion and knowledge sha ing.
Fo unde s anding he ela ion o a glossa y and i s alue o he digi-
al di ide one needs o know abou he digi al di ide and he issues ha
i comp ises. In i s gene al meaning, ‘Digi al Di ide’ e e s o he gap
be ween demog aphics and egions ha ha e access o mode n ICTs.
Andy Ca in (2000) s a ed: “The digi al di ide is one o he mos impo -
an ci il igh s issues acing ou mode n in o ma ion economy.” Ne e -
heless, access o he In e ne , o In o ma ion and ICTs ha e p o ed no
su icien o educe he digi al di ide, which as Ca in highligh ed, is
also abou con en , li e acy, pedagogy, and communi y. Nowadays, i e en
goes beyond hese dimensions. “Digi al exclusion is pa o a b oade
di ide con ibu ing o social and economic exclusion o people. Mul iple
6 0 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological
glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance
Glossa y
aspec s: economic, geog aphic, languages, gende , e c.” (Pa u 2008). As
a social issue, he digi al di ide is becoming mani es in se e al di e en
o ms, which di e en s akeholde s and public o p i a e o ganiza ions
y o o e come. Howe e , “Closing he digi al di ide will no su ice o
close he knowledge di ide o access o use ul, cul u ally ele an know-
ledge is mo e han a ma e o echnology access.” (ibidem)
“In e go e nmen al o ganiza ions such as UNESCO and global o ganiza ions
such as he In e ne Co po a ion o Assigned Names and Numbe s (ICANN),
in addi ion o egional o ganiza ions, non-go e nmen al o ganiza ions (NGOs)
and o he s a e highligh ing he indispensable ole o languages in building in-
clusi e Knowledge Socie ies. Each language o e s a unique es imony o i s
ci iliza ion’s cul u al genius and con ibu es o he wo ld’s he i age – no o
men ion i s c ucial ole in building in e cul u al dialogue, econcilia ion and
peace.” (UNESCO 2017)
UNESCO’s message he e: “In a globalized wo ld wi h in e connec ed
socie ies, in e cul u al dialogue is i al i we a e o li e oge he while
acknowledging ou di e si y. In an unce ain wo ld, he u u e o na ions
depends no only on hei economic capi al o na u al esou ces, bu on
hei collec i e abili y o unde s and and an icipa e changes in he en i-
onmen - h ough educa ion, scien i ic esea ch and he sha ing o know-
ledge.” (Wikip og ess knowledgebase n.d.) The e o e, designing s a egies
ha con ibu e o educe he digi al di ide as well as de ining p inciples
ha impac he in o ma ion socie y ha e always been majo opics o
UNESCO’s p og ammes and ac i i ies.
S a is ical epo s usually indica e an inc ease o In e ne use s and
echnology ma ke pene a ion. In e ne Wo ld S a s p o ide use ul s a-
is ical in o ma ion abou In e ne use s in he wo ld. Global Digi al Snap-
sho p o ides key s a is ical indica o s o he wo ld’s In e ne , mobile
echnology and media use s. Mos o hese igu es show g owing ends
and p edic amazing swi changes in he coming yea s. The accele a ed
change does no occu e enly in all sec o s, as i should be. F om he
igu es shown by he s udy o he Scien i ic Fo esigh Uni (STOA) on
he ‘language equali y in he digi al age’ abou he le el o suppo o
machine ansla ion (MT) by language, only ew languages bene i om
good-quali y so wa e and esou ces in ce ain applica ion a eas, while he
es o languages ha e no so wa e o esou ces o MT suppo . E en
mos o he languages used in he Eu opean Union do no enjoy equal
6 1Te minologija | 2017 | 24
oppo uni ies wi h espec o in o ma ion, communica ion and he know-
ledge sha ing ha is equi ed in ou globalized wo ld.
“While mul ilingualism is one o Eu ope’s g ea es asse s, i is also one o he
mos subs an ial challenges o he c ea ion o a uly in eg a ed EU. A ound
80 languages a e used in he EU, and language ba ie s ha e a p o ound e ec ,
no only on he es ablishmen o a common Eu opean iden i y, bu also on
wo ke mobili y and c oss-bo de e-comme ce, ade and public se ices. This
s udy, published by STOA in Ma ch 2017, cha s he eme gence o new ech-
nological ad ancemen s, based on inc eased compu a ional powe and access o
big da a, h ough which human language echnologies (HLT) a e becoming e-
al solu ion o o e coming language ba ie s. Howe e , mos o he echnical
p og ess so a has been wi h only one language, English.” (Pa aki, Dawood
2017)
No only MT, bu also all a eas ha co e in o ma ion and communi-
ca ion a e subjec o as g ow h o he In e ne and ICTs ha b ing abou
new op ions o access, p ese e, c ea e, and sha e in o ma ion and knowledge.
Sha ing implies a ailabili y o people wi h he possibili y o ha e global
impac . Consequen ly, in o ma ion and knowledge should be equally a ail-
able o communi ies wi h highly de eloped specialised languages as well
as hose wi h less de eloped specialised language and e minologies.
“In i s ea ly de elopmen , he In e ne would o en be assessed om a echno-
logical pe spec i e. Howe e , du ing he las decade, o he issues, o en quali-
ied as “so ”, ha e eme ged ocusing on opics such as human igh s, democ-
acy, p i acy, social equi y, inclusion, local con en c ea ion, in e dependence,
and o he cul u al, educa ional, economic and poli ical aspec s o In e ne use.
Such discussions ha e been ongoing since he c ea ion o he In e ne Go e n-
ance Fo um (IGF), which esul ed om he wo Wo ld Summi s on he In o -
ma ion Socie y (WSIS in Gene a, 2003, and Tunis, 2005) and WSIS+10 Re-
iew P ocess and ou comes. In his con ex , ‘language’ inc easingly is ecog-
nized as an issue, as he u iliza ion o language oday is highly suppo ed by
ICTs and he In e ne . The e o e, he lack o ele an e minology indi ec ly
a ec s digi al and knowledge di ides.
Today, he in e na ional communi y has se e al mul i-s akeholde mecha-
nisms o he dialogue and implemen a ion o solu ions o In e ne go e nance
issues. The WSIS e en s and IGF belong o some o he majo ones. To pa -
icipa e in in e na ional mul i-s akeholde p ocesses, coun ies and hei na-
ional ep esen a i es need also o be equipped wi h language ools ha acili-
a e unde s anding, coope a ion and coo dina ion. One o he la e a e he
apidly g owing mul is akeholde pa ne ship mechanisms ela ed o he go -
e nance o he In e ne .” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 12)
6 2 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological
glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance
Glossa y
Gene ally speaking, when language ools a e de eloped o di e en
communi ies, ICTs ake he lead, and he de elopmen o echnological
aspec s has p io i y. Bu wi h espec o language ools, con en de elop-
men and esou ces a e a he o e. Examples o language esou ces a e:
w i en and spoken co po a, compu a ional lexicons, e minology da a-
bases, speech da a collec ion and p ocessing, e c. Basic so wa e ools a e
also impo an o he acquisi ion, p epa a ion, collec ion, managemen ,
cus omisa ion and use o hese language esou ces and o he kinds o
con en . Howe e , as he u iliza ion o language oday is highly sup-
po ed by in o ma ion and communica ion echnologies (ICT) and he
In e ne , he lack o ele an e minology indi ec ly, bu ine i ably, es-
ablishes digi al and knowledge di ides, which can mani es hemsel es
in di e en ways. The e is, he e o e, a need o con inuous e minol-
ogy planning, ins i u ional capaci y building and e ec i e coo dina ion
mechanisms a egional and coun y le els. (See: In o e m, UNESCO,
ICANN 2017)
Hence he de elopmen o e minologies ha con ibu e o he exchange
o in o ma ion, knowledge and o ac i e pa icipa ion in specialised com-
muni y discussions, cons i u es no only a g ea oppo uni y o use s o
lesse de eloped languages bu also o he de elopmen o s uc u ed
con en wi h a iew o in e ope abili y and sus ainabili y.
The e a e se e al p oduc s wi h e ms ep esen ing concep s such as
hesau i, dic iona ies, da abases, glossa ies. A glossa y is a ype o e mi-
nology esou ce whose alue depends on he aim and way i is de eloped.
B oadly,
“A glossa y, also known as a ocabula y o cla is, is an alphabe ical lis o
e ms in a pa icula domain o knowledge wi h he de ini ions o hose e ms.
A co e glossa y is a simple glossa y o de ining dic iona y ha enables
de ini ion o o he concep s, especially o newcome s o a language o ield o
s udy. I con ains a small wo king ocabula y and de ini ions o impo an o
equen ly encoun e ed concep s, usually including idioms o me apho s use ul
in a cul u e.” (Wikipedia)
The e a e di e en ypes o glossa ies: monolingual, bilingual (usually
a lis o wo ds wi h equi alen s and explana ions in ano he language) and
mul ilingual. Some o hem may include pic u es o symbols o ep esen
concep s. The e a e also glossa ies in he o m o a ocabula y, including
de ini ions o he concep s.
6 3Te minologija | 2017 | 24
Such glossa ies a e aluable esou ces o unde s and he e minology
o a domain o speci ic subjec . I hey a e o ganized acco ding o such
domain/subjec knowledge, hey can be mo e use ul o use s o app e-
hend he concep s. Thei alue becomes mo e p ominen in he new
specialised ields whose quick de elopmen demands o p ac ical solu ions
ha la e can be sha ed, upda ed, eplica ed o imp o ed acco ding o he
needs o hei use s.
“[…] a language which lags behind in i s e minology o a gi en domain o
ac oss many domains, isks losing he abili y o communica e in di e en he-
ma ic domains o ha language o e ime. A language communi y whose lan-
guage has no de eloped scien i ic and echnical e minologies is una oidably
o ced o use some o he , mo e de eloped o eign language o hema ic do-
main communica ion.” (UNESCO 2017)
A e ha ing ou lined some o he issues in connec ion wi h he digi al
di ide and he ole o a glossa y, his a icle in ends o summa ize he
main aspec s abou he me hodology o he In e ne Go e nance Glos-
sa y (IGG) de elopmen and is di ec ed owa ds aising awa eness abou
he di e en possibili ies when planning and de eloping his ype o lan-
guage esou ce, as well as he po en ial use i can ha e o ‘con inuous
e minology planning, ins i u ional capaci y building and e ec i e coo di-
na ion mechanisms a egional and coun y le els’. I also aims a sha ing
he IGG expe ience which can be scaled up o eplica ed by o he com-
muni ies ha do no enjoy he possibili ies o hose wi h highly de eloped
specialised languages. A he same ime, i can be an example o many
communi ies which do no pa icipa e in mul i-s akeholde p ocesses due
o he lack o e minology in new domains o ac oss new domains.
“Unde his aspec , A abic-speaking coun ies and communi ies cu en ly ha e
limi ed oppo uni ies o be ully engaged in cons uc i e dialogue and join ac-
ion in mul i-s akeholde p ocesses due o he inadequa e use o suppo i e
language ools. Hence, solu ions a e needed o s eng hen echnical e minol-
ogy in he A abic language o acili a e he dialogue on he use o A abic on
he In e ne , in an e ec i e, e icien , and coo dina ed manne .
Pa ne s in ol ed in he IGG p ojec commonly ag ee ha he In e ne should
se e all people a ound he wo ld.” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 12)
Finally, his a icle is an oppo uni y o each a wide audience and o
show he ac ions ha majo o ganiza ions such as UNESCO and ICANN,
he e in coope a ion wi h In o e m, a e unde aking o accomplish hei
socie al missions.

6 4 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological
glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance
Glossa y
2. OVERVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY
The In e ne Go e nance Glossa y Me hodology desc ibes “a amewo k
o es ablish an A abic glossa y o In e ne go e nance e ms o suppo
engagemen in mul i-s akeholde In e ne go e nance and policy making
p ocesses by A abic-speaking communi ies on a ious pla o ms, includ-
ing he Wo ld Summi on In o ma ion Socie y (WSIS) and In e ne Go -
e nance Fo um (IGF).” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 7)
F om he e y beginning, he IGG p ojec was de eloped wi h he aim
o p o ide A abic-speaking coun ies and communi ies wi h a glossa y on
In e ne go e nance (IG) along wi h a gene ic me hodology o he c e-
a ion o ha moniza ion o e minology based on in e na ional s anda ds.
Howe e , he eal challenge was o li e up o he s a ed expec a ions ha
“[…] A abic speaking coun ies will use he glossa y o In e ne go e nance
e ms de eloped in a collabo a i e, accu a e and mul i-s akeholde way;
• To help o mula e join agendas, con ibu e o decision making p ocesses,
communica e mo e e ec i ely and encou age hei engagemen in mul i-
s akeholde IG mechanisms;
• To pa icipa e in all kinds o mul i-s akeholde p ocesses;
• To build ins i u ional capaci ies o and coo dina ion mechanisms among e-
gional and na ional o ganiza ions wo king on language issues wi h a iew o
con ibu ing o he p omo ion o and access o he A abic language on he
In e ne .” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 13)
Rega ding he glossa y i sel , i e majo phases we e concei ed o achie e
he expec ed esul s:
• Sc eeningkeydocumen s o iden i yingco econcep sin he ield
o In e ne go e nance (IG).
• P epa a iono ad a glossa yo IG e msinEnglish.
• Publicconsul a ions.
• Localiza iono  heglossa yo IG e msin oA abicandsubsequen 
alida ion p ocess.
• Dis ibu ion.
Pa allelly, in ela ion o he me hodology, i was necessa y o ou line
he p elimina y conside a ions unde ou b oad ca ego ies:
• Te minologywo k om hepoin o  iewo me hodology: conside ing
he subjec ield, a ge audience, and pu pose o he IGG;
• Kindso wo k lowdesignandplanning: adap a ion o he majo
phases (acco ding o ISO 15188:2001), ules o majo In e na ional
6 5Te minologija | 2017 | 24
S anda ds o ISO/TC 37 “Language and e minology”, and good
p ac ice examples;
• Documen s obeconsul ed o  hep epa a iono  heIGG,inaddi ion
oexpe andpolicydocumen sp o idedbyUNESCO: exis ing glossa-
ies, addi ional sou ces, de ining c i e ia o e alua e he documen s;
• Te mcandida esand hei con ex sin hedocumen s: aking in o
conside a ion he kind o in o ma ion p o ided by he e m candi-
da es’ sou ces. Th ee cases we e iden i ied: wi hou de ining con-
ex , cases o insu icien con ex , and e ms used inconsis en ly
in di e en ex s.
App oaching In e ne Go e nance as a speci ic subjec helped o iden-
i y dimensions and ep esen a i e co e concep s unde he ollowing
pe spec i e:
“The ma e o how he In e ne is go e ned is a c i ical one. How we manage
his p ecious, global esou ce di ec ly impac s ou economic and social oppo -
uni ies a in o he u u e.
The Challenge
In e ne go e nance e e s o he p ocesses ha impac how he In e ne is
managed.
As policy make s and echnical expe s wo k o connec he emaining wo-
hi ds o he wo ld’s na ions, he WAY in which he In e ne is go e ned will
likely ha e an impac on how we use i and how i e ol es.
[…] The need o c ea e a clea and simple ways o e e yone - ega dless o
backg ound - o unde s and and be a pa o how he In e ne is un is c i i-
cal. […] In he policy wo ld, his is alked abou as he “mul i-s akeholde ap-
p oach.” Basically, i means ha e e yone who has a s ake in he u u e o he
In e ne needs o ha e a oice in how i ’s un.” (In e ne Socie y)
In b ie , i can be said ha a dynamic ield such as IG unde goes
apid echnical and concep ual de elopmen . Poli ically, i is a highly
sensi i e ield wi h many con o e sial e ms implying s a egic impo ance
o indus y, socie y and policies/public adminis a ion. Besides, he cul-
u al dimension o he In e ne has g ea impac on he p ese a ion o
he cul u al he i age. As IG is essen ial o e e y coun y and e e y ci i-
zen, he IGG con ibu es o cla i ying co e e ms and acili a es a be e
unde s anding o all in e es ed pa ies.
The me hodology o p epa ing he IGG while ollowing in e na ional
s anda ds had o be adap ed o cope wi h he cha ac e is ics men ioned
abo e. Based on he s a e o he a o li e a u e in he ield, i was s uc-
6 6 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological
glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance
Glossa y
u ed in o se en dimensions: In e ne go e nance gene al; in as uc u e
and s anda diza ion; economic dimension; legal dimension; de elopmen
and socio-cul u al dimension; s akeholde s, and o ganiza ions, o ums,
ne wo ks, g oups, con e ences, egula ions and legal ins umen s. Fo mu-
la ions we e c a ed as neu al as possible om he poin o iews o in-
e es g oups. A he same ime, IGG en ies we e o mula ed as use -
iendly as possible add essing well-educa ed eade s. In o he wo ds, he
needs o he a e age use s had o be duly conside ed. In e ne Go e nance
has adop ed he mul i-s akeholde app oach whose lexibili y allows “In-
di iduals and o ganiza ions om di e en ealms pa icipa ing alongside
each o he o sha e ideas o de elop consensus policy.” (In e ne Socie y
2016) F om he expe s’ poin o iew his app oach aims a se ing on a
numbe o ools o p ac ices a he han one single solu ion. Hence, s ake-
holde ’ c i ical issues had o be ca e ully add essed, as hey a e no he
same o each s akeholde . Bea ing in mind he need o ansla ion was
ano he equi emen o be ollowed. This esul ed in an alphabe ical index
as a p ac ical quick- inde o looking up he IGG e ms.
Based on in e na ional s anda ds and bes p ac ices, a gene ic me hod-
ology was concei ed ega ding he ollowing ace s:
• E alua ionandselec iono sou ces.
• S uc u ing hewhole ieldo In e ne Go e nancein odimensions.
• Sys ema icapp oachconce ning hedesigno
o he glossa y s uc u e (mac os uc u e),
o he indi idual glossa y en ies (mic os uc u e),
§ e m- ela ed in o ma ion,
§desc ip ion- ela ed in o ma ion,
§addi ional in o ma ion.
• O e alllayou o  heIGGpublica ion.
Fo p agma ic easons, a combina ion o desc ip i e and p esc ip i e
app oaches ollowing e minology heo y and e minology wo k was cho-
sen. This app oach ook in o accoun specialised lexicog aphy app oaches
which ocus on he e minology occu ing in he specialised communica ion o
a domain. In eal e minology wo k p ac ice, depending on he pu pose
and he esou ces (in e ms o human esou ces and echnology) a ailable,
each p ojec equi es an adap ed wo k low. Bes p ac ices illus a e how
esea che s ha e duly adap ed he ules o majo In e na ional S anda ds
o ISO/TC 37 “Language and e minology”.
6 7Te minologija | 2017 | 24
The ollowing diag am shows he IGG wo k low model designed o i s
de elopmen phases.
Figu e 1: IGG wo k low model
“[While] o mula ing he desc ip ions, special ca e had been aken o p o ide
c oss- e e ences o concep ually ela ed en ies. This and he ha moniza ion o
s yle, layou e c. o all en ies necessi a ed a me iculous adap a ion o he o -
mula ions.” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 24)
In ac , a inal p ocess o ag ee on all modi ica ions o he Glossa y and
o inalise he desc ip ion o he me hodology ook place a e s ep 26.
7 4 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological
glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance
Glossa y
A esou ce like he IGG “can be seen as an ini ia i e o comply wi h
he need o con inuous e minology planning, ins i u ional capaci y build-
ing and e ec i e coo dina ion mechanisms a egional and coun y le els”.
(UNESCO 2017) The IGG o simila ypes o e minological esou ces
can g ea ly bene i he in ol emen and pa icipa ion in he communica-
ion p ocesses o coun ies and communi ies wi h less de eloped special-
ised language and e minologies.
In his connec ion, i needs o be said ha he demand o con en
quali y and con en cu a ion is becoming a c i ical equi emen in he
amewo k o In e ne o Things (IoT) de elopmen s. In any case, i high
con en quali y needs o be assu ed, bes p ac ice e minological p o-
cesses based on pe inen s anda ds mus be ollowed.
SOURCES
Home » Wha We Do » Issues » In e ne Go e nance. – In e ne Socie y.[Online] [Ci ed: Augus 30, 2016.]
h p://www.in e ne socie y.o g/wha -we-do/in e ne -issues/in e ne -go e nance.
We a e social & Hoo sui e. 2017. We a e social Special Repo s Digi al in 2017: Global O e iew. – We a e
social. [Online] Janua y 24, 2017. [Ci ed: May 20, 2017.] h ps://wea esocial.com/special- epo s/
digi al-in-2017-global-o e iew.
REFERENCES
Ca in A. 2000: Mind he Gap: The Digi al Di ide as he Ci il Righ s Issue o he New Millennium. –
Mul imedia&In e ne Schools.Janua y–Feb ua y 2000, The weekly e-Newsle e om MMIS.com.
In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: Home In e ne Go e nance Glossa y (IGG). – In e ne Go e nanceGlos-
sa y(IGG)Me hodology (E. Bahe , C. Galinski, B. Gi aldo, & I. Kasinskai e-Buddebe g, Eds.) [Online]
Ap il 4, 2017. [Ci ed: May 3, 2017.] h p://en.unesco.o g/si es/de aul / iles/in e ne _go e nance_glos-
sa y_me hodology.pd o h ps://en.unesco.o g/in e ne -go e nance-glossa y.
In e ne Socie y 2016: Home » In e ne Go e nance - Why he Mul is akeholde App oach Wo ks. – In e -
ne Go e nance-Why heMul is akeholde App oachWo ks.[Online] Ap il 26, 2016. [Ci ed: June 30,
2016.] B ie ing Pape s. h ps://www.in e ne socie y.o g/doc/in e ne -go e nance-why-mul is akeholde -
app oach-wo ks.
Pa aki Z. G., Dawood A. 2017: Eu opean Pa liamen a y Resea ch Se ice Blog Language Equali y In The
Digi al Age. – Eu opeanPa liamen a yResea chSe iceBlog.[Online] May 10, 2017. [Ci ed: May 18,
2017.] h ps://ep hink ank.eu/2017/05/10/language-equali y-in- he-digi al-age/.
Pa u M. 2008: IN Slide sha e A ainingquali yeduca ion o all:AUNESCOpe spec i e. [Online] Oc obe
31, 2008. [Ci ed: Sep embe 5, 2015.] Slide 11-12. h ps://www.slidesha e.ne /eden_online/a aining-
quali y-educa ion- o -all-a-unesco-pe spec i e-p esen a ion?qid=69b4a61a-3066-4867-8069-0514e 0a125
0& =&b=& om_sea ch=1.
UNESCO 2017: Home In e ne Go e nance Glossa y (IGG). – In e ne Go e nanceGlossa y(IGG).[Online]
Ma ch 27, 2017. [Ci ed: Ap il 4, 2017.] h p://en.unesco.o g/in e ne -go e nance-glossa y.
Wikip og ess knowledge base. – Wikip og essO ganisa ionsUNESCO.[Online] [Ci ed: Ma ch 14, 2017.]
h p://wikip og ess.o g/da a/o ganiza ion/unesco.
Wikipedia – Glossa y. [Online] [Ci ed: Feb ua y 21, 2017.] h ps://en.wikipedia.o g/wiki/Glossa y.
Wo ld S a s 2017: In e ne Wo ld S a s usage and popula ion s a is ics. – In e ne Wo ldS a s.[Online] June
30, 2017. [Ci ed: June 30, 2017.] h p://www.in e ne wo lds a s.com/s a s.h m.

7 5Te minologija | 2017 | 24
TERMINŲ ŽODYNO RENGIMO PRAGMATIKA: UNESCO INTERNETO VALDYMO ŽODYNAS
Spa iin o maciniųi komunikacinių echnologijųplė a,didėjan isžinių isuome-
nėsi poli inissiekismažin iį ai ių ūšiųskai meninęa ski įy ap io i e iniaiklausi-
mai,ku iuoskeliap amonės, iešojoadminis a imoi akademinėspoli ikos o muo-
ojai.Kadbū ųgalimapage in ispecializuo oskomunikacijosi dalijimosižiniomis
e ek y umąbeinaudingumą,gali eikė i obulin iesamusme odusi ku inaujųme-
odųbeip iemonių aikymokoncepcijas.Y ane ienasžinių a kybosp iemonių
plė ojimopasiūlymas,p isidėjęsp iekū imo inkamo u inio,ku įbū ųgalimanaudo-
ipaka o inai, aiky iki ais ikslaisi papildy i, uopa me uge inan są eikumąbei
a umą.Ge aipa eng ižodynaiy apag indiniaiį ankiaispecializuo oskomunikacijos
i dalijimosižiniomise ek y umuii naudingumuige in i.
S aipsnyjeap a iamikaiku iep ak iniai e minųžodynų engimo, emian is
UNESCOin e ne o aldymožodyno(IGG)suda ymopa i imii me odika,aspek ai.
IGGme odikaapimap ak inįnus a y ų e minologijosp incipųi me odų,ypačpa-
eik ųISOTK37s anda uose,p i aikymąi naudojimą.Jągalima aiky iski in-
giems ikslamsį ai ioses i yse, aippa ski ingomsį ai iųišsila inimolygmenų
ikslinėmsg upėms.
IGGme odikapa odo,kad e minologinioda bop incipaii me odaigalibū ip i-
aiky ispecialių iksliniųnaudo ojųpo eikiams.IGGme odikanepakeičiasis eminės
e minologijos,be galibū ipanaudo akaiplabaidinamiškaibesiplė ojančioss i ies,
okios kaip in e ne o aldymas, e minologinio da bo ge oji p ak ika.
Žodynopas e ainėje(h p://en.unesco.o g/in e ne -go e nance-glossa y/abou -igg)
ašoma,kad okįiš ekliųkaipIGGgalimalaiky iinicia y apa enkin i ęs inio e mino-
logijosplana imo,ins i uciniųgebėjimųge inimoi  eiksmingų egioniniobeinacio-
naliniolygmenskoo dina imomechanizmųpo eikį.Tokieiš ekliaigalidaugp isidė i
p iešaliųi bend uomenių,ku iųspecialiosioskalbosi  e minijosnė apakankamai
išplė o os,įsi aukimoi daly a imoge inimo.
Gau a 2017-09-05
Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez
In e na ional In o ma ion Cen e o Te minology (In o e m)
c/o CO SPACE, Gumpendo e S asse 65/1, 1060 Vienna, Aus ia
E-mail sgi aldo@in o e m.o g