Pragmatics for developing a terminological glossary: UNESCO’s Internet Governance Glossary

5 9Te minologija | 2017 | 24 P agma ics o de eloping a e minological glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance Glossa y BLANCA STELLA GIRALDO PEREZ In o e m (In e na ional In o ma ion Cen e o Te minology) KEYWORDS: e minological glossa y, specialised communica ion, digi al di ide, In e ne Go e nance Glossa y (IGG) me hodology, e minological p inciples and me hods, con en 1. BACKGROUND FOR THE INTERNET GOVERNANCE GLOSSARY DEVELOPMENT The swi de elopmen o in o ma ion and communica ion echnologies (ICTs), he g owing knowledge socie ies and he poli ical aim o educe digi al di ides o all so s a e issues high on he agenda o decision mak- e s in indus y, public adminis a ion and academia. To imp o e he e - iciency and e ec i eness o specialised communica ion and knowledge sha ing, he upg ading o exis ing me hods and concep ions o new me h- ods and applica ion o ools a e needed. The e a e se e al p oposals o de eloping knowledge ools ha con ibu e o he c ea ion o sui able con en ha can be eused, e-pu posed and en iched while os e ing in e ope abili y and sus ainabili y. Glossa ies p ope ly de eloped a e basic ools o le e age he e iciency and e ec i eness o specialised communi- ca ion and knowledge sha ing. Fo unde s anding he ela ion o a glossa y and i s alue o he digi- al di ide one needs o know abou he digi al di ide and he issues ha i comp ises. In i s gene al meaning, ‘Digi al Di ide’ e e s o he gap be ween demog aphics and egions ha ha e access o mode n ICTs. Andy Ca in (2000) s a ed: “The digi al di ide is one o he mos impo - an ci il igh s issues acing ou mode n in o ma ion economy.” Ne e - heless, access o he In e ne , o In o ma ion and ICTs ha e p o ed no su icien o educe he digi al di ide, which as Ca in highligh ed, is also abou con en , li e acy, pedagogy, and communi y. Nowadays, i e en goes beyond hese dimensions. “Digi al exclusion is pa o a b oade di ide con ibu ing o social and economic exclusion o people. Mul iple 6 0 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance Glossa y aspec s: economic, geog aphic, languages, gende , e c.” (Pa u 2008). As a social issue, he digi al di ide is becoming mani es in se e al di e en o ms, which di e en s akeholde s and public o p i a e o ganiza ions y o o e come. Howe e , “Closing he digi al di ide will no su ice o close he knowledge di ide o access o use ul, cul u ally ele an know- ledge is mo e han a ma e o echnology access.” (ibidem) “In e go e nmen al o ganiza ions such as UNESCO and global o ganiza ions such as he In e ne Co po a ion o Assigned Names and Numbe s (ICANN), in addi ion o egional o ganiza ions, non-go e nmen al o ganiza ions (NGOs) and o he s a e highligh ing he indispensable ole o languages in building in- clusi e Knowledge Socie ies. Each language o e s a unique es imony o i s ci iliza ion’s cul u al genius and con ibu es o he wo ld’s he i age – no o men ion i s c ucial ole in building in e cul u al dialogue, econcilia ion and peace.” (UNESCO 2017) UNESCO’s message he e: “In a globalized wo ld wi h in e connec ed socie ies, in e cul u al dialogue is i al i we a e o li e oge he while acknowledging ou di e si y. In an unce ain wo ld, he u u e o na ions depends no only on hei economic capi al o na u al esou ces, bu on hei collec i e abili y o unde s and and an icipa e changes in he en i- onmen - h ough educa ion, scien i ic esea ch and he sha ing o know- ledge.” (Wikip og ess knowledgebase n.d.) The e o e, designing s a egies ha con ibu e o educe he digi al di ide as well as de ining p inciples ha impac he in o ma ion socie y ha e always been majo opics o UNESCO’s p og ammes and ac i i ies. S a is ical epo s usually indica e an inc ease o In e ne use s and echnology ma ke pene a ion. In e ne Wo ld S a s p o ide use ul s a- is ical in o ma ion abou In e ne use s in he wo ld. Global Digi al Snap- sho p o ides key s a is ical indica o s o he wo ld’s In e ne , mobile echnology and media use s. Mos o hese igu es show g owing ends and p edic amazing swi changes in he coming yea s. The accele a ed change does no occu e enly in all sec o s, as i should be. F om he igu es shown by he s udy o he Scien i ic Fo esigh Uni (STOA) on he ‘language equali y in he digi al age’ abou he le el o suppo o machine ansla ion (MT) by language, only ew languages bene i om good-quali y so wa e and esou ces in ce ain applica ion a eas, while he es o languages ha e no so wa e o esou ces o MT suppo . E en mos o he languages used in he Eu opean Union do no enjoy equal 6 1Te minologija | 2017 | 24 oppo uni ies wi h espec o in o ma ion, communica ion and he know- ledge sha ing ha is equi ed in ou globalized wo ld. “While mul ilingualism is one o Eu ope’s g ea es asse s, i is also one o he mos subs an ial challenges o he c ea ion o a uly in eg a ed EU. A ound 80 languages a e used in he EU, and language ba ie s ha e a p o ound e ec , no only on he es ablishmen o a common Eu opean iden i y, bu also on wo ke mobili y and c oss-bo de e-comme ce, ade and public se ices. This s udy, published by STOA in Ma ch 2017, cha s he eme gence o new ech- nological ad ancemen s, based on inc eased compu a ional powe and access o big da a, h ough which human language echnologies (HLT) a e becoming e- al solu ion o o e coming language ba ie s. Howe e , mos o he echnical p og ess so a has been wi h only one language, English.” (Pa aki, Dawood 2017) No only MT, bu also all a eas ha co e in o ma ion and communi- ca ion a e subjec o as g ow h o he In e ne and ICTs ha b ing abou new op ions o access, p ese e, c ea e, and sha e in o ma ion and knowledge. Sha ing implies a ailabili y o people wi h he possibili y o ha e global impac . Consequen ly, in o ma ion and knowledge should be equally a ail- able o communi ies wi h highly de eloped specialised languages as well as hose wi h less de eloped specialised language and e minologies. “In i s ea ly de elopmen , he In e ne would o en be assessed om a echno- logical pe spec i e. Howe e , du ing he las decade, o he issues, o en quali- ied as “so ”, ha e eme ged ocusing on opics such as human igh s, democ- acy, p i acy, social equi y, inclusion, local con en c ea ion, in e dependence, and o he cul u al, educa ional, economic and poli ical aspec s o In e ne use. Such discussions ha e been ongoing since he c ea ion o he In e ne Go e n- ance Fo um (IGF), which esul ed om he wo Wo ld Summi s on he In o - ma ion Socie y (WSIS in Gene a, 2003, and Tunis, 2005) and WSIS+10 Re- iew P ocess and ou comes. In his con ex , ‘language’ inc easingly is ecog- nized as an issue, as he u iliza ion o language oday is highly suppo ed by ICTs and he In e ne . The e o e, he lack o ele an e minology indi ec ly a ec s digi al and knowledge di ides. Today, he in e na ional communi y has se e al mul i-s akeholde mecha- nisms o he dialogue and implemen a ion o solu ions o In e ne go e nance issues. The WSIS e en s and IGF belong o some o he majo ones. To pa - icipa e in in e na ional mul i-s akeholde p ocesses, coun ies and hei na- ional ep esen a i es need also o be equipped wi h language ools ha acili- a e unde s anding, coope a ion and coo dina ion. One o he la e a e he apidly g owing mul is akeholde pa ne ship mechanisms ela ed o he go - e nance o he In e ne .” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 12) 6 2 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance Glossa y Gene ally speaking, when language ools a e de eloped o di e en communi ies, ICTs ake he lead, and he de elopmen o echnological aspec s has p io i y. Bu wi h espec o language ools, con en de elop- men and esou ces a e a he o e. Examples o language esou ces a e: w i en and spoken co po a, compu a ional lexicons, e minology da a- bases, speech da a collec ion and p ocessing, e c. Basic so wa e ools a e also impo an o he acquisi ion, p epa a ion, collec ion, managemen , cus omisa ion and use o hese language esou ces and o he kinds o con en . Howe e , as he u iliza ion o language oday is highly sup- po ed by in o ma ion and communica ion echnologies (ICT) and he In e ne , he lack o ele an e minology indi ec ly, bu ine i ably, es- ablishes digi al and knowledge di ides, which can mani es hemsel es in di e en ways. The e is, he e o e, a need o con inuous e minol- ogy planning, ins i u ional capaci y building and e ec i e coo dina ion mechanisms a egional and coun y le els. (See: In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017) Hence he de elopmen o e minologies ha con ibu e o he exchange o in o ma ion, knowledge and o ac i e pa icipa ion in specialised com- muni y discussions, cons i u es no only a g ea oppo uni y o use s o lesse de eloped languages bu also o he de elopmen o s uc u ed con en wi h a iew o in e ope abili y and sus ainabili y. The e a e se e al p oduc s wi h e ms ep esen ing concep s such as hesau i, dic iona ies, da abases, glossa ies. A glossa y is a ype o e mi- nology esou ce whose alue depends on he aim and way i is de eloped. B oadly, “A glossa y, also known as a ocabula y o cla is, is an alphabe ical lis o e ms in a pa icula domain o knowledge wi h he de ini ions o hose e ms. A co e glossa y is a simple glossa y o de ining dic iona y ha enables de ini ion o o he concep s, especially o newcome s o a language o ield o s udy. I con ains a small wo king ocabula y and de ini ions o impo an o equen ly encoun e ed concep s, usually including idioms o me apho s use ul in a cul u e.” (Wikipedia) The e a e di e en ypes o glossa ies: monolingual, bilingual (usually a lis o wo ds wi h equi alen s and explana ions in ano he language) and mul ilingual. Some o hem may include pic u es o symbols o ep esen concep s. The e a e also glossa ies in he o m o a ocabula y, including de ini ions o he concep s. 6 3Te minologija | 2017 | 24 Such glossa ies a e aluable esou ces o unde s and he e minology o a domain o speci ic subjec . I hey a e o ganized acco ding o such domain/subjec knowledge, hey can be mo e use ul o use s o app e- hend he concep s. Thei alue becomes mo e p ominen in he new specialised ields whose quick de elopmen demands o p ac ical solu ions ha la e can be sha ed, upda ed, eplica ed o imp o ed acco ding o he needs o hei use s. “[…] a language which lags behind in i s e minology o a gi en domain o ac oss many domains, isks losing he abili y o communica e in di e en he- ma ic domains o ha language o e ime. A language communi y whose lan- guage has no de eloped scien i ic and echnical e minologies is una oidably o ced o use some o he , mo e de eloped o eign language o hema ic do- main communica ion.” (UNESCO 2017) A e ha ing ou lined some o he issues in connec ion wi h he digi al di ide and he ole o a glossa y, his a icle in ends o summa ize he main aspec s abou he me hodology o he In e ne Go e nance Glos- sa y (IGG) de elopmen and is di ec ed owa ds aising awa eness abou he di e en possibili ies when planning and de eloping his ype o lan- guage esou ce, as well as he po en ial use i can ha e o ‘con inuous e minology planning, ins i u ional capaci y building and e ec i e coo di- na ion mechanisms a egional and coun y le els’. I also aims a sha ing he IGG expe ience which can be scaled up o eplica ed by o he com- muni ies ha do no enjoy he possibili ies o hose wi h highly de eloped specialised languages. A he same ime, i can be an example o many communi ies which do no pa icipa e in mul i-s akeholde p ocesses due o he lack o e minology in new domains o ac oss new domains. “Unde his aspec , A abic-speaking coun ies and communi ies cu en ly ha e limi ed oppo uni ies o be ully engaged in cons uc i e dialogue and join ac- ion in mul i-s akeholde p ocesses due o he inadequa e use o suppo i e language ools. Hence, solu ions a e needed o s eng hen echnical e minol- ogy in he A abic language o acili a e he dialogue on he use o A abic on he In e ne , in an e ec i e, e icien , and coo dina ed manne . Pa ne s in ol ed in he IGG p ojec commonly ag ee ha he In e ne should se e all people a ound he wo ld.” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 12) Finally, his a icle is an oppo uni y o each a wide audience and o show he ac ions ha majo o ganiza ions such as UNESCO and ICANN, he e in coope a ion wi h In o e m, a e unde aking o accomplish hei socie al missions. 6 4 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance Glossa y 2. OVERVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY The In e ne Go e nance Glossa y Me hodology desc ibes “a amewo k o es ablish an A abic glossa y o In e ne go e nance e ms o suppo engagemen in mul i-s akeholde In e ne go e nance and policy making p ocesses by A abic-speaking communi ies on a ious pla o ms, includ- ing he Wo ld Summi on In o ma ion Socie y (WSIS) and In e ne Go - e nance Fo um (IGF).” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 7) F om he e y beginning, he IGG p ojec was de eloped wi h he aim o p o ide A abic-speaking coun ies and communi ies wi h a glossa y on In e ne go e nance (IG) along wi h a gene ic me hodology o he c e- a ion o ha moniza ion o e minology based on in e na ional s anda ds. Howe e , he eal challenge was o li e up o he s a ed expec a ions ha “[…] A abic speaking coun ies will use he glossa y o In e ne go e nance e ms de eloped in a collabo a i e, accu a e and mul i-s akeholde way; • To help o mula e join agendas, con ibu e o decision making p ocesses, communica e mo e e ec i ely and encou age hei engagemen in mul i- s akeholde IG mechanisms; • To pa icipa e in all kinds o mul i-s akeholde p ocesses; • To build ins i u ional capaci ies o and coo dina ion mechanisms among e- gional and na ional o ganiza ions wo king on language issues wi h a iew o con ibu ing o he p omo ion o and access o he A abic language on he In e ne .” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 13) Rega ding he glossa y i sel , i e majo phases we e concei ed o achie e he expec ed esul s: • Sc eeningkeydocumen s o iden i yingco econcep sin he ield o In e ne go e nance (IG). • P epa a iono ad a glossa yo IG e msinEnglish. • Publicconsul a ions. • Localiza iono  heglossa yo IG e msin oA abicandsubsequen  alida ion p ocess. • Dis ibu ion. Pa allelly, in ela ion o he me hodology, i was necessa y o ou line he p elimina y conside a ions unde ou b oad ca ego ies: • Te minologywo k om hepoin o  iewo me hodology: conside ing he subjec ield, a ge audience, and pu pose o he IGG; • Kindso wo k lowdesignandplanning: adap a ion o he majo phases (acco ding o ISO 15188:2001), ules o majo In e na ional 6 5Te minologija | 2017 | 24 S anda ds o ISO/TC 37 “Language and e minology”, and good p ac ice examples; • Documen s obeconsul ed o  hep epa a iono  heIGG,inaddi ion oexpe andpolicydocumen sp o idedbyUNESCO: exis ing glossa- ies, addi ional sou ces, de ining c i e ia o e alua e he documen s; • Te mcandida esand hei con ex sin hedocumen s: aking in o conside a ion he kind o in o ma ion p o ided by he e m candi- da es’ sou ces. Th ee cases we e iden i ied: wi hou de ining con- ex , cases o insu icien con ex , and e ms used inconsis en ly in di e en ex s. App oaching In e ne Go e nance as a speci ic subjec helped o iden- i y dimensions and ep esen a i e co e concep s unde he ollowing pe spec i e: “The ma e o how he In e ne is go e ned is a c i ical one. How we manage his p ecious, global esou ce di ec ly impac s ou economic and social oppo - uni ies a in o he u u e. The Challenge In e ne go e nance e e s o he p ocesses ha impac how he In e ne is managed. As policy make s and echnical expe s wo k o connec he emaining wo- hi ds o he wo ld’s na ions, he WAY in which he In e ne is go e ned will likely ha e an impac on how we use i and how i e ol es. […] The need o c ea e a clea and simple ways o e e yone - ega dless o backg ound - o unde s and and be a pa o how he In e ne is un is c i i- cal. […] In he policy wo ld, his is alked abou as he “mul i-s akeholde ap- p oach.” Basically, i means ha e e yone who has a s ake in he u u e o he In e ne needs o ha e a oice in how i ’s un.” (In e ne Socie y) In b ie , i can be said ha a dynamic ield such as IG unde goes apid echnical and concep ual de elopmen . Poli ically, i is a highly sensi i e ield wi h many con o e sial e ms implying s a egic impo ance o indus y, socie y and policies/public adminis a ion. Besides, he cul- u al dimension o he In e ne has g ea impac on he p ese a ion o he cul u al he i age. As IG is essen ial o e e y coun y and e e y ci i- zen, he IGG con ibu es o cla i ying co e e ms and acili a es a be e unde s anding o all in e es ed pa ies. The me hodology o p epa ing he IGG while ollowing in e na ional s anda ds had o be adap ed o cope wi h he cha ac e is ics men ioned abo e. Based on he s a e o he a o li e a u e in he ield, i was s uc- 6 6 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance Glossa y u ed in o se en dimensions: In e ne go e nance gene al; in as uc u e and s anda diza ion; economic dimension; legal dimension; de elopmen and socio-cul u al dimension; s akeholde s, and o ganiza ions, o ums, ne wo ks, g oups, con e ences, egula ions and legal ins umen s. Fo mu- la ions we e c a ed as neu al as possible om he poin o iews o in- e es g oups. A he same ime, IGG en ies we e o mula ed as use - iendly as possible add essing well-educa ed eade s. In o he wo ds, he needs o he a e age use s had o be duly conside ed. In e ne Go e nance has adop ed he mul i-s akeholde app oach whose lexibili y allows “In- di iduals and o ganiza ions om di e en ealms pa icipa ing alongside each o he o sha e ideas o de elop consensus policy.” (In e ne Socie y 2016) F om he expe s’ poin o iew his app oach aims a se ing on a numbe o ools o p ac ices a he han one single solu ion. Hence, s ake- holde ’ c i ical issues had o be ca e ully add essed, as hey a e no he same o each s akeholde . Bea ing in mind he need o ansla ion was ano he equi emen o be ollowed. This esul ed in an alphabe ical index as a p ac ical quick- inde o looking up he IGG e ms. Based on in e na ional s anda ds and bes p ac ices, a gene ic me hod- ology was concei ed ega ding he ollowing ace s: • E alua ionandselec iono sou ces. • S uc u ing hewhole ieldo In e ne Go e nancein odimensions. • Sys ema icapp oachconce ning hedesigno o he glossa y s uc u e (mac os uc u e), o he indi idual glossa y en ies (mic os uc u e), § e m- ela ed in o ma ion, §desc ip ion- ela ed in o ma ion, §addi ional in o ma ion. • O e alllayou o  heIGGpublica ion. Fo p agma ic easons, a combina ion o desc ip i e and p esc ip i e app oaches ollowing e minology heo y and e minology wo k was cho- sen. This app oach ook in o accoun specialised lexicog aphy app oaches which ocus on he e minology occu ing in he specialised communica ion o a domain. In eal e minology wo k p ac ice, depending on he pu pose and he esou ces (in e ms o human esou ces and echnology) a ailable, each p ojec equi es an adap ed wo k low. Bes p ac ices illus a e how esea che s ha e duly adap ed he ules o majo In e na ional S anda ds o ISO/TC 37 “Language and e minology”. 6 7Te minologija | 2017 | 24 The ollowing diag am shows he IGG wo k low model designed o i s de elopmen phases. Figu e 1: IGG wo k low model “[While] o mula ing he desc ip ions, special ca e had been aken o p o ide c oss- e e ences o concep ually ela ed en ies. This and he ha moniza ion o s yle, layou e c. o all en ies necessi a ed a me iculous adap a ion o he o - mula ions.” (In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: 24) In ac , a inal p ocess o ag ee on all modi ica ions o he Glossa y and o inalise he desc ip ion o he me hodology ook place a e s ep 26. 7 4 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez P agma ics o de eloping a e minological glossa y: UNESCO’s In e ne Go e nance Glossa y A esou ce like he IGG “can be seen as an ini ia i e o comply wi h he need o con inuous e minology planning, ins i u ional capaci y build- ing and e ec i e coo dina ion mechanisms a egional and coun y le els”. (UNESCO 2017) The IGG o simila ypes o e minological esou ces can g ea ly bene i he in ol emen and pa icipa ion in he communica- ion p ocesses o coun ies and communi ies wi h less de eloped special- ised language and e minologies. In his connec ion, i needs o be said ha he demand o con en quali y and con en cu a ion is becoming a c i ical equi emen in he amewo k o In e ne o Things (IoT) de elopmen s. In any case, i high con en quali y needs o be assu ed, bes p ac ice e minological p o- cesses based on pe inen s anda ds mus be ollowed. SOURCES Home » Wha We Do » Issues » In e ne Go e nance. – In e ne Socie y.[Online] [Ci ed: Augus 30, 2016.] h p://www.in e ne socie y.o g/wha -we-do/in e ne -issues/in e ne -go e nance. We a e social & Hoo sui e. 2017. We a e social Special Repo s Digi al in 2017: Global O e iew. – We a e social. [Online] Janua y 24, 2017. [Ci ed: May 20, 2017.] h ps://wea esocial.com/special- epo s/ digi al-in-2017-global-o e iew. REFERENCES Ca in A. 2000: Mind he Gap: The Digi al Di ide as he Ci il Righ s Issue o he New Millennium. – Mul imedia&In e ne Schools.Janua y–Feb ua y 2000, The weekly e-Newsle e om MMIS.com. In o e m, UNESCO, ICANN 2017: Home In e ne Go e nance Glossa y (IGG). – In e ne Go e nanceGlos- sa y(IGG)Me hodology (E. Bahe , C. Galinski, B. Gi aldo, & I. Kasinskai e-Buddebe g, Eds.) [Online] Ap il 4, 2017. [Ci ed: May 3, 2017.] h p://en.unesco.o g/si es/de aul / iles/in e ne _go e nance_glos- sa y_me hodology.pd o h ps://en.unesco.o g/in e ne -go e nance-glossa y. In e ne Socie y 2016: Home » In e ne Go e nance - Why he Mul is akeholde App oach Wo ks. – In e - ne Go e nance-Why heMul is akeholde App oachWo ks.[Online] Ap il 26, 2016. [Ci ed: June 30, 2016.] B ie ing Pape s. h ps://www.in e ne socie y.o g/doc/in e ne -go e nance-why-mul is akeholde - app oach-wo ks. Pa aki Z. G., Dawood A. 2017: Eu opean Pa liamen a y Resea ch Se ice Blog Language Equali y In The Digi al Age. – Eu opeanPa liamen a yResea chSe iceBlog.[Online] May 10, 2017. [Ci ed: May 18, 2017.] h ps://ep hink ank.eu/2017/05/10/language-equali y-in- he-digi al-age/. Pa u M. 2008: IN Slide sha e A ainingquali yeduca ion o all:AUNESCOpe spec i e. [Online] Oc obe 31, 2008. [Ci ed: Sep embe 5, 2015.] Slide 11-12. h ps://www.slidesha e.ne /eden_online/a aining- quali y-educa ion- o -all-a-unesco-pe spec i e-p esen a ion?qid=69b4a61a-3066-4867-8069-0514e 0a125 0& =&b=& om_sea ch=1. UNESCO 2017: Home In e ne Go e nance Glossa y (IGG). – In e ne Go e nanceGlossa y(IGG).[Online] Ma ch 27, 2017. [Ci ed: Ap il 4, 2017.] h p://en.unesco.o g/in e ne -go e nance-glossa y. Wikip og ess knowledge base. – Wikip og essO ganisa ionsUNESCO.[Online] [Ci ed: Ma ch 14, 2017.] h p://wikip og ess.o g/da a/o ganiza ion/unesco. Wikipedia – Glossa y. [Online] [Ci ed: Feb ua y 21, 2017.] h ps://en.wikipedia.o g/wiki/Glossa y. Wo ld S a s 2017: In e ne Wo ld S a s usage and popula ion s a is ics. – In e ne Wo ldS a s.[Online] June 30, 2017. [Ci ed: June 30, 2017.] h p://www.in e ne wo lds a s.com/s a s.h m. 7 5Te minologija | 2017 | 24 TERMINŲ ŽODYNO RENGIMO PRAGMATIKA: UNESCO INTERNETO VALDYMO ŽODYNAS Spa iin o maciniųi komunikacinių echnologijųplė a,didėjan isžinių isuome- nėsi poli inissiekismažin iį ai ių ūšiųskai meninęa ski įy ap io i e iniaiklausi- mai,ku iuoskeliap amonės, iešojoadminis a imoi akademinėspoli ikos o muo- ojai.Kadbū ųgalimapage in ispecializuo oskomunikacijosi dalijimosižiniomis e ek y umąbeinaudingumą,gali eikė i obulin iesamusme odusi ku inaujųme- odųbeip iemonių aikymokoncepcijas.Y ane ienasžinių a kybosp iemonių plė ojimopasiūlymas,p isidėjęsp iekū imo inkamo u inio,ku įbū ųgalimanaudo- ipaka o inai, aiky iki ais ikslaisi papildy i, uopa me uge inan są eikumąbei a umą.Ge aipa eng ižodynaiy apag indiniaiį ankiaispecializuo oskomunikacijos i dalijimosižiniomise ek y umuii naudingumuige in i. S aipsnyjeap a iamikaiku iep ak iniai e minųžodynų engimo, emian is UNESCOin e ne o aldymožodyno(IGG)suda ymopa i imii me odika,aspek ai. IGGme odikaapimap ak inįnus a y ų e minologijosp incipųi me odų,ypačpa- eik ųISOTK37s anda uose,p i aikymąi naudojimą.Jągalima aiky iski in- giems ikslamsį ai ioses i yse, aippa ski ingomsį ai iųišsila inimolygmenų ikslinėmsg upėms. IGGme odikapa odo,kad e minologinioda bop incipaii me odaigalibū ip i- aiky ispecialių iksliniųnaudo ojųpo eikiams.IGGme odikanepakeičiasis eminės e minologijos,be galibū ipanaudo akaiplabaidinamiškaibesiplė ojančioss i ies, okios kaip in e ne o aldymas, e minologinio da bo ge oji p ak ika. Žodynopas e ainėje(h p://en.unesco.o g/in e ne -go e nance-glossa y/abou -igg) ašoma,kad okįiš ekliųkaipIGGgalimalaiky iinicia y apa enkin i ęs inio e mino- logijosplana imo,ins i uciniųgebėjimųge inimoi  eiksmingų egioniniobeinacio- naliniolygmenskoo dina imomechanizmųpo eikį.Tokieiš ekliaigalidaugp isidė i p iešaliųi bend uomenių,ku iųspecialiosioskalbosi  e minijosnė apakankamai išplė o os,įsi aukimoi daly a imoge inimo. Gau a 2017-09-05 Blanca S ella Gi aldo Pe ez In e na ional In o ma ion Cen e o Te minology (In o e m) c/o CO SPACE, Gumpendo e S asse 65/1, 1060 Vienna, Aus ia E-mail sgi aldo@in o e m.o g