scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Critical success factors in BPM implementation: Creating AI supported decision engine for the business

Abstract

In today's rapidly evolving business environment, achieving operational efficiency, transparency, and market responsiveness is crucial for success. Business Process Management (BPM) is a critical tool in this pursuit, encompassing the design, configuration, enactment, and analysis of business processes to drive continuous improvement. Recent advancements in Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models offer new opportunities to enhance BPM through improved decision-making and progress-tracking capabilities. However, there is a significant gap in the literature concerning the systematic development of AI-powered decision engines to support BPM implementation. This thesis addresses this gap by partially employing Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) with some limitations described in the document to develop a decision engine artifact tailored for BPM adoption. The research utilizes concept of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) essential for BPM, incorporating AI to automate and optimize decision-making processes. The methodology involves a thorough literature review, the conceptualization and design of a decision engine model, and the development of a prototype. This prototype is evaluated through expert reviews, providing critical insights into its effectiveness and practical applicability. The findings indicate that the integration of AI, particularly GPT models, can significantly enhance BPM by providing dynamic insights and automating complex decision-making processes. The developed decision engine prototype offers a structured approach to BPM adoption, tailored to different organizational stages and supported by a comprehensive list of CSFs. This research contributes to both academic knowledge and practical applications, offering a foundational framework for organizations to enhance their BPM efforts and advance the dialogue on data-driven decision-making in business process implementation.

Read accessible full text

Critical success factors in BPM implementation: Creating AI supported decision engine for the business

Author: Lipov, Victor
Year: 2024
Source: https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/175043/1/TGI3564.pdf
Mas e Deg ee P og am in
In o ma ion Sys ems and Technologies Managemen
C i ical success ac o s in BPM implemen a ion: C ea ing AI
suppo ed decision engine o he business.
Vic o Lipo
Mas e Thesis
p esen ed as pa ial equi emen o ob aining he Mas e Deg ee in In o ma ion Managemen
NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School
Ins i u o Supe io de Es a ís ica e Ges ão de In o mação
Uni e sidade No a de Lisboa
MGI
NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School
Ins i u o Supe io de Es a ís ica e Ges ão de In o mação
Uni e sidade No a de Lisboa
C i ical success ac o s in BPM implemen a ion: C ea ing AI suppo ed decision engine o
he business.
by
Vic o Lipo
Mas e Thesis p esen ed as he pa ial equi emen o ob aining a Mas e 's deg ee in
In o ma ion Managemen , specializa ion in In o ma ion Sys ems and Technologies
Managemen
Supe ised by
Ped o Manuel Maia Mal a, PhD
NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School
July, 2024
i
STATEMENT OF INTEGRITY
I he eby decla e ha ing conduc ed his academic wo k wi h in eg i y. I con i m ha I ha e no
used plagia ism o any o m o undue use o in o ma ion o alsi ica ion o esul s along he
p ocess leading o i s elabo a ion. I u he decla e ha I ha e ully acknowledged he Rules
o Conduc and Code o Hono om he NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School.
[Lisboa, 13/07/2024]
ii
ABSTRACT
In oday's apidly e ol ing business en i onmen , achie ing ope a ional e iciency,
anspa ency, and ma ke esponsi eness is c ucial o success. Business P ocess Managemen
(BPM) is a c i ical ool in his pu sui , encompassing he design, con igu a ion, enac men , and
analysis o business p ocesses o d i e con inuous imp o emen . Recen ad ancemen s in
Gene a i e P e- ained T ans o me (GPT) models o e new oppo uni ies o enhance BPM
h ough imp o ed decision-making and p og ess- acking capabili ies. Howe e , he e is a
signi ican gap in he li e a u e conce ning he sys ema ic de elopmen o AI-powe ed
decision engines o suppo BPM implemen a ion.
This hesis add esses his gap by pa ially employing Design Science Resea ch Me hodology
(DSRM) wi h some limi a ions desc ibed in he documen o de elop a decision engine a i ac
ailo ed o BPM adop ion. The esea ch u ilizes concep o C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs)
essen ial o BPM, inco po a ing AI o au oma e and op imize decision-making p ocesses. The
me hodology in ol es a ho ough li e a u e e iew, he concep ualiza ion and design o a
decision engine model, and he de elopmen o a p o o ype. This p o o ype is e alua ed
h ough expe e iews, p o iding c i ical insigh s in o i s e ec i eness and p ac ical
applicabili y.
The indings indica e ha he in eg a ion o AI, pa icula ly GPT models, can signi ican ly
enhance BPM by p o iding dynamic insigh s and au oma ing complex decision-making
p ocesses. The de eloped decision engine p o o ype o e s a s uc u ed app oach o BPM
adop ion, ailo ed o di e en o ganiza ional s ages and suppo ed by a comp ehensi e lis o
CSFs. This esea ch con ibu es o bo h academic knowledge and p ac ical applica ions,
o e ing a ounda ional amewo k o o ganiza ions o enhance hei BPM e o s and
ad ance he dialogue on da a-d i en decision-making in business p ocess implemen a ion.
KEYWORDS
Business P ocess Managemen ; A i icial In elligence; Decision Engine; C i ical Success Fac o s
Sus ainable De elopmen Goals (SDG):
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S a emen o In eg i y ...................................................................................................... i
Abs ac ............................................................................................................................ ii
Lis o Figu es ....................................................................................................................
Lis o Tables .................................................................................................................... i
Lis o Abb e ia ions and Ac onyms ............................................................................... ii
1. In oduc ion ................................................................................................................ 1
2. Li e a u e e iew ........................................................................................................ 2
2.1. Key Concep s and De ini ions o AI- ela ed hings ............................................. 2
2.1.1. A i icial In elligence (AI) .............................................................................. 2
2.1.2. La ge Language Models (LLMs) ..................................................................... 2
2.1.3. GPT (Gene a i e P e- ained T ans o me ) .................................................. 3
2.1.4. Business P ocess Managemen (BPM) .......................................................... 3
2.1.5. C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) ...................................................................... 3
2.1.6. Decision Engine ............................................................................................. 3
2.1.7. Sen imen Analysis ........................................................................................ 3
2.2. De ailed Explana ions o AI Componen s ............................................................ 3
2.2.1. Machine Lea ning (ML) ................................................................................. 3
2.2.2. Na u al Language P ocessing (NLP) .............................................................. 4
2.2.3. Deep Lea ning ............................................................................................... 4
2.3. Iden i ica ion o cu en s a e o bpm adop ion o legal en i y ........................... 4
2.4. Role o AI in BPM ................................................................................................. 6
3. Me hodology .............................................................................................................. 9
3.1. P oblem Iden i ica ion ......................................................................................... 9
3.2. Objec i es o a Solu ion ....................................................................................... 9
3.3. Design and De elopmen ..................................................................................... 9
3.4. Summa y o An icipa ed Ou comes ................................................................... 10
4. Empi ical S udy ......................................................................................................... 12
4.1. App oach o decision engine p o o ype ............................................................ 12
4.2. Decision engine p o o ype ................................................................................. 13
4.3. Simula ed Example o p ac ical applica ion. ...................................................... 16
5. Resul s and discussion .............................................................................................. 19
5.1. Exposi ion o Empi ical Resul s .......................................................................... 19

i
5.2. Valida ion o Empi ical Resul s .......................................................................... 19
5.2.1. CEO ............................................................................................................. 20
5.2.2. CFO .............................................................................................................. 20
5.2.3. Manage ...................................................................................................... 21
5.2.4. Summa y o he eedback: .......................................................................... 21
5.3. Discussion .......................................................................................................... 22
5.4. DE P o o ype Implemen a ion Adjus men s Based on Expe Sugges ions ....... 22
6. Conclusions and u u e wo ks ................................................................................... 24
6.1. Syn hesis o he Wo k Done wi h Highligh o he Recommenda ions Made ... 24
6.1.1. Key Recommenda ions: .............................................................................. 24
6.2. Limi a ions o he Wo k Done ............................................................................ 25
6.3. Fu he Wo k Possible o Do .............................................................................. 25
Bibliog aphical Re e enczoes ......................................................................................... 26
Appendix A - E hics Commi ee Repo ......................................................................... 28
Appendix B – Decision engine p o o ype ...................................................................... 29
Appendix C - Expe Ques ionnai e ............................................................................... 30
LIST OF FIGURES
Figu e 2.4.1 - BPM li ecycle en iched wi h AI ............................................................................ 7
Figu e 4.1.1 - DE p o o ype logic ............................................................................................. 12
Figu e 4.2.1 - BPM Adop ion S age P og ession ...................................................................... 15
Figu e 4.2.2 - CSF Sco ing App oach ........................................................................................ 15
i
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.3.1 - Top 10 ac o s a ec ing BMP implemen a ion (Cas o e al., 2019) .................... 5
Table 2.3.2 - CSFs o di e en s ages o BPM adop ion (Buh e al., 2015) ............................... 6
Table 4.2.1 - BPM Adop ion S ages ......................................................................................... 13
Table 4.2.2 - C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) o S age 1 .......................................................... 14
Table 4.3.1 - BPM adop ion simula ion ................................................................................... 16
Table 5.4.1 - DE adjus men s based on eedback .................................................................... 22
ii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AI
A i icial In elligence
BPM
Business P ocess Managemen
CSF
C i ical Success Fac o s
DSRM
Design Science Resea ch Me hodology
GPT
Gene a i e P e- ained T ans o me
LLM
La ge Language Models
NLP
Na u al Language P ocessing
ROI
Re u n on In es men
SDG
Sus ainable De elopmen Goals
DE
Decision Engine
7
domains and asks (Teubne e al., 2023) and GPT-like models, ha e signi ican ly enhanced
he abili y o analyze and iden i y bo h explici and implici p ocesses wi hin an
o ganiza ion. I means ha you can apply GPT-like models o s uc u ed and uns uc u ed
da a o dig he p ocesses o de elop solu ion o he p oblem.
In he esea ch done by (Weinzie l e al., 2024), he e a e h ee equen examples o using
ML:
• p o iding decision suppo h ough p edic ions
• disco e ing accu a e p ocess models
• imp o ing esou ce alloca ion.
Keeping his in mind, esea che s ha e de eloped se e al BPM-speci ic solu ions ha
ex ac in o ma ion om ex ual documen s using Na u al Language P ocessing
echniques. (G ohs e al., 2023)
In his esea ch, G ohs e al., 2023 illus a ed how LLM can be u ilized o p ac ical BPM
asks which equi ed ex ual documen s as inpu . Cha GPT4 was u ilized o his ask. Fo
all h ee asks, GPT4 pe o ms simila ly o o be e han he benchma k, i.e., speci ic
applica ions o he espec i e ask (G ohs e al., 2023).
The e a e also inc easing numbe o se ices o Con e be ween P ocess Models and
Na u al Language Tex u ilizing g aphical modeling languages. I allows s akeholde s o
collec i ely desc ibe execu able business p ocesses on a concep ual le el. (F ey ag e al.,
n.d.).
Comp ehensi e li e a u e e iew being done on he opic o “Machine lea ning in business
p ocess managemen ” by (Weinzie l e al., 2024). Resul ed in en iched BPM li ecycle BPM
li ecycle o Dumas e al. (2018). Which gi es highe le el p ac ical iew pe spec i e on he
a eas, whe e AI can be applied.
Figu e 2.4.1 - BPM li ecycle en iched wi h AI

8
F om he pe spec i e o ou esea ch, i helps o unde s and be e he ongoing p ocesses
in he o ganiza ion and ack he p ocesses which a e adop ed o BPM.
Machine Lea ning (ML) has been pa icula ly use ul in imp o ing ce ain pa s o Business
P ocess Managemen (BPM). These imp o emen s mos ly happen in a eas whe e he e is
a lo o da a, such as disco e ing new p ocesses, analyzing hem, and keeping an eye on
hem o e ime. In hese a eas, da a abou business ac i i ies is usually a ailable in
de ailed eco ds, which ML can easily use (Sa ke , 2021; Weinzie l e al., 2024).
Howe e , esea che s sugges ha we could make e en mo e p og ess by using
echniques om ields like na u al language p ocessing (NLP) and compu e ision. NLP
helps compu e s unde s and and wo k wi h human language, while compu e ision helps
hem unde s and images and ideos. By combining hese echniques wi h ML, we could
c ea e new and be e ways o manage business p ocesses ha go beyond jus using da a
logs. This could lead o inno a i e solu ions ha a e mo e e ec i e and e sa ile.
Weinzie l e al., 2024 also p opose o conside he en e p ise p ocess ne wo k ins ead o
isola ed business p ocesses. In doing ha , ML applica ions ecei e inpu da a om
mul iple da a sou ces, including con ol- low in o ma ion om di e en business
p ocesses and p ocess con ex in o ma ion ela ed o he business p ocesses.
Le e aging LLMs and GPT models acili a es comp ehensi e p ocess iden i ica ion,
dynamic oadmap de elopmen , eal- ime implemen a ion moni o ing, and he acking
o quali a i e me ics. These capabili ies add ess signi ican gaps in adi ional BPM
app oaches, pa ing he way o mo e e ec i e and e icien sys ems. By con inuously
in eg a ing AI-d i en insigh s, o ganiza ions can ensu e hei BPM ini ia i es a e no only
success ul bu also adap able o u u e challenges and oppo uni ies (G ohs e al., 2023;
Weinzie l e al., 2024).
In addi ion o adi ional pe o mance me ics, acking quali a i e me ics such as
sen imen and in ol emen (how people eel and how in ol ed hey a e in hei wo k) is
i al o comp ehensi e BPM e alua ion. AI echnologies, including sen imen analysis and
engagemen acking ools, can analyze quali a i e da a o p o ide deepe insigh s in o
employee mo ale, cus ome sa is ac ion, and o e all o ganiza ional engagemen . These
insigh s p o ide a deepe unde s anding o he wo kplace a mosphe e and cus ome
expe iences, allowing o ganiza ions o pinpoin a eas ha need imp o emen and ake
speci ic ac ions o enhance o e all BPM esul s.
9
3. METHODOLOGY
This sec ion ou lines he me hodology adop ed o his esea ch, aiming o iden i y and u ilize
C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) wi hin BPM o de elop a decision engine a i ac ha suppo s
BPM implemen a ion.
The ini ial idea was o apply Design Science Resea ch Me hodology (DSRM) as a amewo k
o his s udy (Hasan & Sha i zadeh, 2020; Hunzike & Blankenagel, 2024). Howe e , due o
he lack o access o a eal-wo ld company, i was no easible o accomplish s ages o DSRM
such as Demons a ion and E alua ion ully. Ne e heless, some pa s o DSRM we e applied,
such as P oblem Iden i ica ion, Objec i es o a Solu ion, Design and De elopmen . De ailed
desc ip ion p o ided below:
3.1. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
Objec i e: The p ima y goal a his s age is o iden i y he cu en challenges and gaps in
BPM implemen a ion. This in ol es a deep di e in o exis ing li e a u e and esea ch o
pinpoin a eas whe e BPM p ac ices a e lacking, pa icula ly ocusing on he sys ema ic
de elopmen o AI-suppo ed decision engines. The objec i e is o es ablish a clea
unde s anding o he p oblems aced by o ganiza ions in adop ing and op imizing BPM
sys ems.
App oach: A comp ehensi e li e a u e e iew was conduc ed o ga he insigh s in o he
cu en s a e o BPM adop ion, common challenges, and he po en ial ole o AI in
enhancing BPM. This in ol ed analyzing a ious schola ly a icles, indus y epo s, and
case s udies o iden i y ecu ing hemes and issues. The li e a u e e iew also included
an examina ion o exis ing AI echnologies and hei applica ions in BPM, p o iding a
ounda ional unde s anding o how AI can be le e aged o add ess iden i ied challenges.
A his s age we iden i ied impo ance o CSFs o BPM adop ion as well as b eakdown o
BPM adop ion o di e en S ages (s a es o o ganiza ion).
3.2. OBJECTIVES OF A SOLUTION
Objec i e: The nex s ep is o de ine he goals and equi emen s o he AI-suppo ed
decision engine. This in ol es se ing clea , measu able objec i es ha he decision engine
aims o achie e. The objec i e is o ensu e ha he p oposed solu ion add esses he
iden i ied challenges and gaps in BPM implemen a ion e ec i ely.
App oach: Insigh s om he li e a u e e iew and expe in e iews we e u ilized o
ou line he objec i es. The objec i es we e e ined h ough i e a i e eedback, ensu ing
hey a e aligned wi h he needs o o ganiza ions and he capabili ies o AI echnologies.
This app oach ensu ed ha he solu ion is bo h heo e ically sound and p ac ically
ele an .
3.3. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
Objec i e: The p ima y goal he e is o de elop he decision engine a i ac based on he
iden i ied CSFs and he de ined objec i es. This in ol es a de ailed design and
10
de elopmen p ocess, ensu ing ha he decision engine is obus , scalable, and capable
o add essing he iden i ied challenges in BPM implemen a ion.
S age 1: Iden i ica ion o Cu en S a e o BPM Adop ion
App oach: The cu en BPM adop ion s age o he o ganiza ion was assessed using a
s uc u ed amewo k. This amewo k was de i ed om he esea ch o Buh e al.
(2015), which ca ego izes BPM adop ion in o a ious s ages and iden i ies associa ed
CSFs o each s age.
S age 2: Iden i y CSFs o Respec i e S a e
App oach: The lis o c i ical success ac o s (CSFs) was condensed om Buh e al.
(2015) esea ch o ocus on he mos ele an ac o s o each BPM adop ion s age. This
in ol ed p io i izing CSFs ha ha e he highes impac on BPM success and a e mos
applicable o he o ganiza ion's cu en s a e. This p ocess included:
• Re iewing he de ailed desc ip ions and jus i ica ions o each CSF.
• E alua ing hei applicabili y based on he o ganiza ion's speci ic con ex and
needs.
• Engaging wi h subjec ma e expe s o alida e he selec ion and p io i iza ion o
CSFs.
S age 3: De elop a Sco ing App oach o Respec i e S a e
App oach: The sco ing app oach was de eloped wi h he suppo o GPT-4 h ough a
se ies o p omp s and p ac ical expe ience. This p ocess in ol ed:
• De ining clea c i e ia o each CSF based on li e a u e and expe inpu .
• De eloping a a ing scale (e.g., 1 o 5) o each c i e ion o quan i y he le el o
achie emen o pe o mance.
• Tes ing he sco ing app oach h ough simula ed scena ios and expe alida ion o
ensu e i s eliabili y and alidi y.
P omp s example:
• Please sugges lis o c i e ia which can be used o sco ing {p oposed sco ing
app oach}.
• Wha kind o scales can be applied o {measu emen c i e ia}.
Responses we e c i ically analyzed and adop ed o he opic.
S age 4: C i ical E alua ion
App oach: In e iews wi h expe s ac oss di e en le els o he co po a e hie a chy
we e conduc ed o e alua e he p o o ype om a ious pe spec i es. This included:
• Conduc ing s uc u ed in e iews wi h CEO le el, CFO le el and line manage s o
ga he di e se insigh s.
• Analyzing he eedback o iden i y common hemes, s eng hs, and a eas o
imp o emen in he decision engine.
3.4. SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED OUTCOMES
The an icipa ed ou comes o his esea ch include:
11
• A lis o C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) o BPM implemen a ion, ailo ed o di e en
s ages o BPM adop ion.
• A heo e ical model o an AI-suppo ed decision engine ha inco po a es hese
CSFs, p o iding a s uc u ed app oach o enhance BPM p ac ices.
• C i ical insigh s om expe s ac oss di e en le els o expe ise in BPM.
This esea ch aspi es o con ibu e o bo h academic knowledge and p ac ical applica ions
in BPM. By p o iding a ounda ional amewo k o AI-enhanced BPM implemen a ion, i
aims o suppo o ganiza ions in achie ing highe le els o ope a ional e iciency,
anspa ency, and ma ke esponsi eness.
12
4. EMPIRICAL STUDY
4.1. APPROACH TO DECISION ENGINE PROTOTYPE
De elopmen o Decision Engine (DE) can add ess complexi y and add anspa ency o he
p ocess o BPM adop ion. As pe de ini ion, decision engines a e sophis ica ed so wa e
sys ems designed o au oma e he decision-making p ocesses wi hin an o ganiza ion.
I ope a es by analyzing inpu da a h ough a se o p ede ined ules, algo i hms, o
machine lea ning models o make decisions o ecommenda ions wi hou human
in e en ion (pu ely based on a ailable da a). These engines a e pa icula ly aluable in
scena ios whe e as , consis en , and accu a e decisions a e c ucial, such as in c edi
sco ing, aud de ec ion, cus ome se ice, and many o he ope a ional p ocesses.
Fo his pape , we decided s ep aside om gene alized ac o s and align decision engine
wi h di e en s ages o BPM adop ion. To do his, we de eloped he p o o ype in he
ollowing logic:
Figu e 4.1.1 - DE p o o ype logic
The idea behind is ha be o e we s a , we should unde s and whe e we a e now. When
we unde s and whe e we a e, we can decide wha o do nex and how o do i .

13
4.2. DECISION ENGINE PROTOTYPE
F om ou pe spec i e decision engine p o o ype should be adop able and p ac ical. I
should guide he end use h ough he di e en s ages; he e o e, i should help answe ing
wo ini ial ques ions:
• Whe e he o ganiza ion is now?
• Wha should i do nex ?
To answe o he i s ques ion he p o o ype includes desc ip ion o BPM adop ion s ages
as pe Buh e al., 2015. Iden i ica ion, and Mo ing o wa d ac ions we e de i ed wi h
suppo o Cha GPT4 using p omp s like:
• based on you expe ience, how can o ganiza ion be iden i ied a {S age}
• please sugges possible ac ions o he o ganiza ion o ad ance u he
and summa ized o he able below:
Table 4.2.1 - BPM Adop ion S ages
S age
Desc ip ion
Iden i ica ion
Mo ing Fo wa d
Ac ions
Awa eness and
Unde s anding
o BPM
O ganiza ions
ecognize he
impo ance o BPM.
P ocess
imp o emen is ad
hoc, eac i e, and
uns uc u ed.
BPM is a new
concep o he e is
limi ed
unde s anding o
p ocess managemen
p inciples
o ganiza ion-wide.
In oduce o mal
BPM aining and
es ablish a sense o
u gency o p ocess
imp o emen .
Desi e o Adop
BPM
O ganiza ions a e
mo i a ed o adop
BPM and a e
beginning o plan
hei ini ia i es.
Managemen shows
in e es in BPM, and
ini ial esou ces a e
alloca ed.
Secu e op
managemen
suppo , appoin a
p ojec champion,
and de ine business
d i e s.
BPM P ojec s
O ganiza ions
execu e speci ic BPM
p ojec s wi h de ined
objec i es and plans.
Clea objec i es,
plans, and ex e nal
consul an guidance
a e in place.
Communica e
objec i es, seek
p o essional
guidance, and
mo i a e eam
membe s.
BPM P og am
BPM is in eg a ed
in o he
o ganiza ion’s
b oade s a egy and
p og ams.
Con inuous op
managemen
suppo , p o essional
guidance, and
e ec i e
communica ion a e
e iden .
Ensu e ongoing
suppo , main ain
consul an
pa ne ships, and
iden i y KPIs.
P oduc iza ion
o BPM
BPM p ac ices a e
s anda dized and
Key pe o mance
indica o s (KPIs) a e
Focus on aining,
secu ing op
14
p oduc ized wi hin
he o ganiza ion.
de ined, employees
a e educa ed and
mo i a ed, and BPM
is embedded in
decision-making.
managemen
endo semen , and
e ining p ocesses
based on KPIs.
Fo example:
S age 1: Awa eness and Unde s anding o BPM
• Desc ip ion: O ganiza ions a his s age ha e begun o ecognize he impo ance o
BPM. P ocess imp o emen is ypically ad hoc, eac i e, and uns uc u ed. The
o ganiza ion ecognizes BPM as a po en ial alue-add and begins o unde s and i s
p inciples and bene i s.
• Iden i ica ion: I BPM is a new concep o i he e is limi ed unde s anding o p ocess
managemen p inciples o ganiza ion-wide, i 's likely a his s age.
• Mo ing Fo wa d: In oduce o mal BPM aining and es ablish a sense o u gency o
p ocess imp o emen .
I he desc ip ion ma ches he ype o o ganiza ion, he o ganiza ion can become
awa e o ocus poin s and sugges ions ele an o he s age. In ou example:
• Focus: Educa ion on BPM impo ance and i s impac on pe o mance.
• Educa ion and Communica ion: Conduc wo kshops and aining sessions o
educa e s akeholde s abou he bene i s and p inciples o BPM.
• Visible Execu i e Suppo : Secu e and showcase execu i e endo semen o highligh
he impo ance o BPM wi hin he o ganiza ion.
• Case S udies and Success S o ies: Sha e case s udies o success ul BPM
implemen a ions o illus a e po en ial gains and encou age buy-in.
The same applies o po en ial p oblems. As a esul , he o ganiza ion ge s a lis o
CSFs o conside . In ou example, o he i s s age o BPM adop ion, CSFs include
empowe men o employees, cus ome ocus, and openness o changes (Buh e al.,
2015).
Table 4.2.2 - C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) o S age 1
CSF
Focus Poin s
Ac ions
Empowe men o
Employees
T aining and wo kshops o
enhance unde s anding o
BPM.
Conduc mon hly BPM aining
sessions and in e ac i e
wo kshops.
15
Cus ome Focus
Implemen eedback loops o
align p ocesses wi h cus ome
needs.
In oduce su eys and eedback
o ms pos -cus ome
in e ac ions.
Openness o
Changes
Encou age a cul u e o
adap abili y and con inuous
imp o emen .
De elop and communica e a
s uc u ed change managemen
plan, implemen a ecogni ion
p og am o success ul changes.
By knowing CSFs, he o ganiza ion can de elop sco ing app oaches, measu emen c i e ia,
scales, e c.
Below is a lowcha ep esen ing he p og ession h ough di e en s ages o BPM
adop ion, highligh ing key ac ions and ocus poin s a each s age.
Figu e 4.2.1 - BPM Adop ion S age P og ession
A ada cha showing he sco ing o di e en CSFs helps isualize he s eng hs and a eas
o imp o emen o each ac o .
Figu e 4.2.2 - CSF Sco ing App oach
Including hese ables and cha s enhances he cla i y and p ac icali y o he p o o ype,
making i easie o o ganiza ions o na iga e h ough he s ages o BPM adop ion.
16
4.3. SIMULATED EXAMPLE OF PRACTICAL APPLICATION.
Wi h he suppo o Cha GPT4 we ha e done se ies o p ac ical simula ions on how i can
be applied o he eal-wo ld scena ios.
Company P o ile:
Name: Tech Inno a o s Inc.
Indus y: Technology Solu ions
Cu en BPM Adop ion S age: Awa eness and Unde s anding o BPM
The company decides o s a BPM adop ion smoo hly by ocusing on wo key p ocesses:
he Cus ome Suppo P ocess and he P oduc De elopmen P ocess.
P omp s used:
• Please gene a e lis o possible asks o {s ep} o {ac ion / ask} o {s age}
• Wha possible esul s/ ou comes can be o {s ep} o {ac ion / ask} o {s age}
Table 4.3.1 - BPM adop ion simula ion
S ep
Ac ion/Task
Expec ed Resul
1. Ini ial Assessmen
Su eys
Conduc in e nal su eys o
ga he insigh s om employees.
Clea unde s anding o cu en
BPM knowledge and
engagemen .
In e iews
Conduc in e iews wi h key
s akeholde s.
Iden i y pain poin s and
oppo uni ies o
imp o emen .
Documen Re iew
Analyze exis ing p ocess
documen a ion, aining eco ds,
and pe o mance me ics.
Iden i y gaps and a eas
needing enhancemen .
Ou come
The assessmen e ealed ha while he e was an
acknowledgmen o he need o BPM, he p ocess imp o emen
ini ia i es we e ad hoc, eac i e, and uns uc u ed. This placed
Tech Inno a o s in he "Awa eness and Unde s anding o BPM"
s age.
2. De ine CSFs
Empowe men o
Employees
Enhance employees'
unde s anding o BPM and
encou age con ibu ions.
Imp o ed employee
engagemen and pa icipa ion
in BPM ini ia i es.
Cus ome Focus
Implemen mechanisms o
ga he and ac on cus ome
eedback.
Be e alignmen o cus ome
needs wi h suppo p ocesses.
23
cus ome
eedback, and
os e
adap abili y.
and inc eased
lexibili y.
clea inancial
me ics.
inancial cla i y,
and adap abili y.
De elop
Sco ing
App oach
De elop c i e ia
and a ing scales
o each CSF
based on
li e a u e and
expe inpu .
S uc u ed
e alua ion o BPM
e ec i eness.
Manage : Ensu e
sco ing is simple
and ac ionable.
P ac ical and easy-
o-apply sco ing
sys em o
e alua ing BPM
e ec i eness.
Implemen
Decision
Engine
Conduc BPM
aining sessions,
in oduce
eedback
mechanisms, and
communica e
change
managemen
plans.
Inc eased
unde s anding o
BPM, enhanced
cus ome eedback
in eg a ion, and
highe adap abili y
o change.
CEO: Balance AI
insigh s wi h
human
in e ac ion; CFO:
Ensu e cos -
bene i analysis;
Manage :
Suppo ca ee
de elopmen .
Imp o ed BPM
unde s anding,
be e eedback
in eg a ion, cos -
e ec i e decisions,
and enhanced
employee g ow h.
E alua ion
and Resul s
Measu e
imp o emen s in
employee
engagemen ,
cus ome
sa is ac ion, and
adap abili y.
Demons a ed
imp o emen s in
BPM p ac ices and
s akeholde
engagemen .
CFO: Include
inancial KPIs;
Manage :
Regula eedback
sessions.
Comp ehensi e
e alua ion showing
enhanced BPM
p ac ices, inancial
pe o mance, and
s akeholde
engagemen .
This esea ch con ibu es o bo h academic discou se and p ac ical applica ions in BPM. By
de eloping and alida ing an AI-suppo ed decision engine p o o ype, i o e s a ounda ional
amewo k o o ganiza ions o enhance hei BPM e o s.
The amewo k can be used in any ype o o ganiza ion and on di e en s ages o
de elopmen , bu p ac ical applica ion should be suppo ed by u he esea ches.
The in eg a ion o AI echnologies and human-cen ic design p inciples ensu es ha BPM
ini ia i es a e e ec i e, adap able, and aligned wi h o ganiza ional goals. Fu u e esea ch
could ocus on e ining he decision engine based on b oade indus y eedback and explo ing
i s applica ion in di e en o ganiza ional se ings.

24
6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORKS
In his inal chap e , we syn hesize he wo k done in his esea ch, highligh he
ecommenda ions made, discuss he limi a ions encoun e ed, and sugges possible di ec ions
o u he esea ch.
6.1. SYNTHESIS OF THE WORK DONE WITH HIGHLIGHT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS MADE
This hesis explo ed he in eg a ion o AI-suppo ed decision engines in o Business P ocess
Managemen (BPM) o enhance BPM adop ion and implemen a ion. The p ima y
con ibu ions o his esea ch a e:
Li e a u e Re iew: A comp ehensi e li e a u e e iew iden i ied C i ical Success Fac o s
(CSFs) c ucial o BPM implemen a ion and examined he ole o AI, pa icula ly La ge
Language Models (LLMs) like GPT, in BPM.
De elopmen o a Decision Engine P o o ype: Using some o he componen s o Design
Science Resea ch Me hodology, we de eloped a decision engine p o o ype ailo ed o
di e en s ages o BPM adop ion. The engine was designed o guide o ganiza ions h ough
awa eness, adop ion, p ojec execu ion, and p oduc iza ion s ages, p o iding s age-
speci ic ecommenda ions.
Empi ical S udy: The p o o ype was es ed h ough a simula ed case s udy o Tech
Inno a o s Inc., demons a ing i s p ac ical applica ion and e ec i eness in imp o ing
BPM p ac ices.
Expe Valida ion: In e iews wi h indus y expe s alida ed he app oach and p o ided
c i ical eedback o imp o emen . The ecommenda ions om expe s included
managing expec a ions, inco po a ing inancial me ics, ensu ing clea communica ion,
and balancing AI-d i en insigh s wi h human judgmen .
6.1.1. Key Recommenda ions:
Realis ic Communica ion: Clea ly communica e he bene i s and limi a ions o BPM o
a oid o e hyping and o build a solid ounda ion.
Leade ship Commi men : Ensu e s ong and empa he ic leade ship o d i e BPM
ini ia i es.
Financial Me ics: In eg a e inancial pe o mance me ics o demons a e ROI and
secu e execu i e suppo .
Human In e ac ion: Balance AI insigh s wi h human-cen ic ea u es o build us and
acili a e engagemen .
25
T aining and Educa ion: Conduc p ac ical aining and wo kshops o enhance
employee unde s anding.
6.2. LIMITATIONS OF THE WORK DONE
Se e al limi a ions we e encoun e ed du ing his esea ch:
Lack o Real-Wo ld Company Access: The inabili y o access a eal-wo ld company limi ed
he scope o empi ical alida ion. The simula ed case s udy p o ided aluable insigh s bu
lacked he complexi y o eal-wo ld implemen a ion.
Scope o Expe In e iews: While expe eedback was c ucial, he sample size was small.
A b oade ange o indus y pe spec i es could p o ide mo e comp ehensi e alida ion.
P o o ype Tes ing: The decision engine p o o ype was es ed in a con olled en i onmen .
Real-wo ld es ing migh e eal addi ional challenges and a eas o e inemen .
6.3. FURTHER WORK POSSIBLE TO DO
Fu u e esea ch could add ess he limi a ions and expand on he indings o his hesis:
Real-Wo ld Implemen a ion: Conduc case s udies wi h eal-wo ld companies o alida e
and e ine he decision engine p o o ype in di e se o ganiza ional se ings.
B oade Expe Feedback: Engage wi h a la ge and mo e di e se g oup o indus y expe s
o ob ain comp ehensi e alida ion and insigh s.
Ad anced AI In eg a ion: Explo e he in eg a ion o mo e ad anced AI echniques, such
as ein o cemen lea ning and hyb id AI models, o enhance he decision engine's
capabili ies.
Longi udinal S udies: Conduc longi udinal s udies o assess he long- e m impac o AI-
suppo ed decision engines on BPM adop ion and pe o mance.
Cus omiza ion o Di e en Indus ies: De elop indus y-speci ic e sions o he decision
engine o add ess unique challenges and equi emen s in sec o s such as heal hca e,
inance, and manu ac u ing.
By add essing he limi a ions and pu suing u he esea ch, we can con inue o ad ance
he ield and suppo o ganiza ions in achie ing g ea e ope a ional e iciency and ma ke
esponsi eness.
26
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCZOES
Buh, B., Ko ačič, A., & Indiha Š embe ge , M. (2015). C i ical success ac o s o di e en
s ages o business p ocess managemen adop ion – a case s udy. Economic Resea ch-
Ekonomska Is aži anja, 28(1), 243–258.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1041776
Cas o, B. K. D. A., D esch, A., & Vei , D. R. (2019). Key c i ical success ac o s o BPM
implemen a ion: A heo e ical and p ac ical iew. Business P ocess Managemen
Jou nal, 26(1), 239–256. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2018-0272
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reije s, H. A. (2018). Fundamen als o Business P ocess
Managemen . Sp inge Be lin Heidelbe g. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-
4
F ey ag, T., Kanzle , B., Lege , N., & Semling, D. (n.d.). NLP as a Se ice: An API o Con e
be ween P ocess Models and Na u al Language Tex .
G ohs, M., Abb, L., Elsayed, N., & Rehse, J.-R. (2023). La ge Language Models can accomplish
Business P ocess Managemen Tasks (a Xi :2307.09923). a Xi .
h p://a xi .o g/abs/2307.09923
Han, J., Pei, J., & Tong, H. (2022). Da a mining: Concep s and echniques. Mo gan kau mann.
Hasan, R., & Sha i zadeh, R. (2020). Design Science Resea ch Me hodology As a Solu ion-
O ien ed Me hodology.
Hunzike , S., & Blankenagel, M. (2024). Design Science Resea ch Design (pp. 97–116).
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-658-42739-9_6
Khu ana, D., Koli, A., Kha e , K., & Singh, S. (2023). Na u al language p ocessing: S a e o he
a , cu en ends and challenges. Mul imedia Tools and Applica ions, 82(3), 3713–
3744. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4
Liu, B. (2020). In oduc ion. In Sen imen Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sen imen s, and Emo ions
(pp. 1–17). Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
Sa ke , I. H. (2021). Machine Lea ning: Algo i hms, Real-Wo ld Applica ions and Resea ch
Di ec ions. SN Compu e Science, 2(3), 160. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s42979-021-
00592-x
Teubne , T., Fla h, C. M., Weinha d , C., Van De Aals , W., & Hinz, O. (2023). Welcome o he
E a o Cha GPT e al.: The P ospec s o La ge Language Models. Business & In o ma ion
Sys ems Enginee ing, 65(2), 95–101. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s12599-023-00795-x
an de Aa, H., Ca mona, J., Leopold, H., Mendling, J., & Pad ó, L. (2018, Augus ). Challenges
and Oppo uni ies o Applying Na u al Language P ocessing in Business P ocess
Managemen .
Van De Aals , W. M. P. (2013). Business P ocess Managemen : A Comp ehensi e Su ey. ISRN
So wa e Enginee ing, 2013, 1–37. h ps://doi.o g/10.1155/2013/507984
Weinzie l, S., Zilke , S., Dunze , S., & Ma zne , M. (2024). Machine lea ning in business p ocess
managemen : A sys ema ic li e a u e e iew. Expe Sys ems wi h Applica ions, 253,
124181. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124181
27
Weske, M. (2012). In oduc ion. In M. Weske (Ed.), Business P ocess Managemen : Concep s,
Languages, A chi ec u es (pp. 3–23). Sp inge Be lin Heidelbe g.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2_1
Copeland, B. (2024). a i icial in elligence. Encyclopedia B i annica.
h ps://www.b i annica.com/ echnology/a i icial-in elligence
McDonough, M. (2024). la ge language model. Encyclopedia B i annica.
Cha GPT4. (2024). Cha GPT. h ps://cha gp .com/
Amazon Web Se ices. (2024). Wha is GPT? Amazon. h ps://aws.amazon.com/wha -is/gp /
28
APPENDIX A - ETHICS COMMITTEE REPORT

29
APPENDIX B – DECISION ENGINE PROTOTYPE
S age o BPM adop ion
Focus poin s and
sugges ions ele an o
he s age
Po en ial p oblems a he
espec i e s age
CSFs o add ess and me hods o
use
P oposed Sco ing app oach Measu men c i e ia Scale Da a sou ces Example o insigh and ecommenda ions Decision logic
Empowe men o Employees: O e
aining and wo kshops o imp o e
employees' unde s anding o BPM and i s
bene i s, and c ea e a sugges ion sys em
ha enables hem o con ibu e ideas.
Emplo yee Empowe men : Sco ing could
be based on employee aining ini ia i es,
he p esence o a sugges ions p og am,
and he le el o au onomy employees
ha e in hei oles.
Numbe o BPM- ela ed aining sessions
held.
Employee pa icipa ion a e in BPM
aining and wo kshops.
Scale: 1 (No
in ol emen ) o 5
(Full in ol emen
and empowe men
in BPM ac i i ies).
In e nal sugges ion
sys ems, HR eco ds.
Ac ionable Insigh : Employees a e no sugges ing p ocess
imp o emen s, indica ing a lack o empowe men .
Recommenda ion:
De elop and implemen an idea managemen sys em o
cap u e employee sugges ions.
Hold egula wo kshops and aining sessions o educa e
employees on BPM p inciples.
Encou age manage s o os e a cul u e ha alues inpu
om all eam membe s.
I he a e age sco e o employee
empowe men is below 3, he
decision engine ecommends
p io i izing employee engagemen
ini ia i es.
Cus ome Focus: Implemen a eedback
loop wi h cus ome s o unde s and hei
needs and expec a ions, and in eg a e his
eedback in o p ocess imp o emen plans.
Cus ome Focus: Measu e he ex en o
which cus ome eedback in luences
p ocess changes and he alignmen o
p ocesses o cus ome needs.
Exis ence and u iliza ion o cus ome
eedback mechanisms in p ocesses.
Numbe o p ocess imp o emen s d i en
by cus ome eedback.
1 (No in eg a ed) o
5 (Fully in eg a ed
and d i ing BPM
ini ia i es).
Cus ome se ice
eedback, p ocess
documen a ion.
I cus ome ocus is a ed high bu
change openness is low, sugges
s a egies o mo e esponsi e
p ocess imp o emen s based on
cus ome eedback.
Openness o Changes: Encou age a
cul u e ha alues adap abili y h ough
egula communica ion abou he bene i s
o change and ecogni ion o eams ha
emb ace and lead success ul change
ini ia i es.
Openness o Change: Assess he
o ganiza ion's his o y and eadiness o
change, he exis ence o change
managemen s a egies, and lexibili y in
cu en p ocesses.
Exis ence and u iliza ion o cus ome
eedback mechanisms in p ocesses.
Numbe o p ocess imp o emen s d i en
by cus ome eedback.
1 (Resis an o any
change) o 5
(Ac i ely emb aces
change).
Chang e log s, p ojec
managemen ools.
In ol emen and Full Suppo o Top
Managemen : Ensu e ha op
managemen no only endo ses bu is also
ac i ely in ol ed in BPM ini ia i es by
leading p ojec kick-o s and egula ly
e iewing p og ess.
Top Managemen In o l emen : Sco e
based on isible suppo om leade ship,
alloca ion o esou ces o BPM, and
communica ion abou he impo ance o
BPM om op managemen .
F equency and consis ency o
communica ion om op managemen
ega ding BPM.
In es men in BPM ini ia i es (budge ,
esou ces).
1 (No suppo ) o 5
(Highly isible and
commi ed suppo ).
Mee ing minu es,
execu i e
communica ions.
Ac ionable Insigh : Top managemen in ol emen in
BPM ini ia i es is minimal.
Recommenda ion:
Schedule egula BPM b ie ings o op managemen o
epo on p og ess and alue.
Appoin a senio execu i e as a BPM sponso o inc ease
isibili y and commi men .
C ea e a BPM s ee ing commi ee including op
managemen o o e see ini ia i es.
I op managemen suppo sco es
less han 3, igge a
ecommenda ion o execu i e
wo kshops on BPM alue.
I a p ojec champion is no
iden i ied o sco es low,
ecommend es ablishing a clea
champion ole wi h de ined
esponsibili ies and au ho i y.
P ojec Champion: Appoin a espec ed
leade wi hin he o ganiza ion o ac as a
BPM champion who will ad oca e o and
d i e BPM e o s.
P ojec Champion P esence: E alua e
he appoin men o p ojec champions o
BPM ini ia i es and he au ho i y and
esou ces gi en o hem.
Iden i ica ion and ac i i y le el o BPM
champions o p ocess owne s.
Impac assessmen o p ojec champions
on BPM p ojec s (p og ess, success
s o ies).
1 (No champion) o
5 (S ong, e ec i e
champion
p omo ing BPM).
P ojec
documen a ion,
s akeholde su eys.
Business D i e s (a Sense o U gency):
Iden i y and communica e he business
impe a i es ha necessi a e BPM, such as
ma ke p essu e o e iciency gains, o
c ea e a sense o u gency o change.
Sense o U gency/Business D i e s:
De e mine whe he he e's a clea
unde s anding ac oss he o ganiza ion o
he need o BPM, d i en by compe i i e
p essu e, e iciency goals, o o he
business impe a i es.
Documen a ion and communica ion o
business impe a i es d i ing BPM
adop ion.
Response ime o c i ical p ocess- ela ed
issues o ma ke changes.
1 (No d i e s
iden i ied) o 5
(Clea d i e s
iden i ied and
communica ed wi h
u gency).
S a egic plans,
in e nal
communica ions.
Clea ly De ined Objec i es and Plan:
De elop a o mal p ojec cha e o each
BPM p ojec ha ou lines i s objec i es,
scope, expec ed bene i s, and imeline.
P ojec Communica ion: Sco e he
cla i y and equency o communica ion
abou BPM p ojec goals, p og ess, and
ou comes.
Cla i y and dissemina ion o p ojec goals
and miles ones ac oss he o ganiza ion.
Numbe o documen ed and
communica ed BPM p ojec plans.
1 (Ve y unclea ) o
5 (Ex emely clea
and well unde s ood
by all s akeholde s).
P ojec cha e s,
communica ion
eco ds.
Ac ionable Insigh : P ojec objec i es and plans a e no
well-communica ed ac oss he o ganiza ion.
Recommenda ion:
U ilize a cen alized communica ion pla o m o
dissemina e BPM p ojec upda es.
Include clea communica ion plans in all BPM p ojec
cha e s.
Es ablish egula all-hands mee ings o discuss BPM
p ojec s and in i e eedback.
When sco es o p ojec
communica ion and cla i y a e
low, he logic emphasizes
imp o ing p ojec cha e s and
communica ion plans.
I mo i a ion o change is high
bu guidance om consul an s is
low, he logic sugges s a e iew o
consul an selec ion c i e ia and
engagemen e ec i eness.
P o essional Guidance o Ex e nal
Consul an s: Engage wi h consul an s
who ha e a p o en ack eco d in BPM
o p o ide expe ise and an ex e nal
pe spec i e.
Ex e nal Consul an s' Guidance: Ra e
he ex en and e ec i eness o ex e nal
consul ancy use, including he ans e o
knowledge and p ac ices o in e nal eams.
Consul an engagemen sco e based on
p ojec ou comes and eedback.
ROI om con sul an -led ini ia i es e sus
in e nally led.
1 (No in ol ed/no
con ibu ion) o 5
(Signi ican
in ol emen /con ib
u ion).
Consul an
pe o mance
e alua ions, p ojec
ou come analyses.
People Who A e Willing and Mo i a ed
o Change: Selec p ojec eam membe s
who a e open o change and ha e
demons a ed adap abili y; in ol e hem
in decision-making o keep hem
mo i a ed.
Change Willingness: Measu e he
o ganiza ion's eadiness o change
speci ic o BPM p ojec s, including s a
engagemen and pa icipa ion.
P e and pos - aining assessmen sco es on
BPM eadiness.
Employee u no e a es in depa men s
unde going BPM p ojec s.
1 (High esis ance)
o 5 (Eage
willingness and
mo i a ion o
change).
Engagemen su eys,
pa icipa ion eco ds
in BPM ini ia i es.
Miscommunica ion: I no
e ec i ely communica ed, BPM
can be seen as a buzzwo d a he
han a aluable me hodology,
leading o skep icism.
Insu icien Execu i e Suppo :
Wi h ou s ong leade ship
endo semen , BPM e o s may
no be aken se iously o
p io i ized.
O e whelm wi h In o ma ion:
An abundance o case s udies and
in o ma ion can lead o
con usion abou whe e o s a o
un ealis ic expec a ions.
Cul u al Resis ance: E en wi h
awa eness, he e can be inhe en
esis ance o change wi hin he
o ganiza ion's cul u e ha is ha d
o o e come.
Misalignmen o Expec a ions:
S akeholde s may ha e di e en
expec a ions om BPM, leading
o con lic s o disillusionmen i
no managed well.
Selec ion o Inco ec P ojec s:
Choosing he w ong p ojec s o
ini ial BPM e o s can esul in a
lack o isible success and
diminished c edibili y.
P ojec Managemen Issues:
Wi h ou s ong p o jec
managemen , BPM p ojec s may
ace delays, budge o e uns, o
scope c eep.
Inadequa e Measu emen :
Poo ly de ined KPIs o a lack o
measu emen ools can lead o
ine ec i e moni o ing and he
inabili y o demons a e alue.
Desi e o Adop BPM
Desc ip ion: The o ganiza ion
acknowledges he need o BPM and
is mo i a ed o s a adop ing BPM
p ac ices. The e migh be some
in o mal p ocess imp o emen s, bu
no o ganized e o ye .
The o ganiza ion decides o commi
o BPM p ac ices and s a s o build
in e nal desi e o change and p ocess
imp o emen .
Iden i ica ion: I he e is en husiasm
abou BPM and discussions abou i s
po en ial bene i s a e occu ing, bu
no s uc u ed app oach has been
aken, his indica es s age 2.
Mo ing Fo wa d: De elop a clea
ision and s a egy o BPM and s a
engaging s akeholde s o suppo
BPM ini ia i es.
Focus: Building in e nal buy-in
and p epa ing he o ganiza ion
o change.
Cul u e and Change
Managemen : Fos e a cul u e
ecep i e o change by in ol ing
employees in he BPM discussion
ea ly on. Add ess esis ance
p oac i ely.
S akeholde Engagemen :
Iden i y and engage key
s akeholde s o c ea e a coali ion
ha desi es BPM adop ion,
ensu ing hei needs and
conce ns a e add essed.
BPM P ojec s
Desc ip ion: The o ganiza ion has
ini ia ed speci ic BPM p ojec s,
ocusing on imp o ing pa icula
p ocesses. These a e o en pilo
p ojec s ha se e as p oo o
concep .Speci ic BPM p ojec s a e
ini ia ed, o en as pilo s o ini ial
e o s o apply BPM p inciples o
pa icula business p ocesses.
Iden i ica ion: I he e a e one o
mo e BPM p ojec s unde way wi h
dedica ed esou ces and goals, he
o ganiza ion is in his s age.
Mo ing Fo wa d: Analyze he
ou comes o hese p ojec s o e ine
he BPM app oach and p epa e o
b oade implemen a ion.
Focus: Gaining expe ience in
BPM and demons a ing ea ly
wins.
Selec Pilo P ojec s: Choose
ini ial BPM p ojec s ca e ully,
a ge ing high-impac a eas
whe e quick wins a e achie able.
P ojec Managemen Bes
P ac ices: U ilize s uc u ed
me hodologies and obus p ojec
managemen p ac ices o ensu e
he success o BPM p ojec s.
Moni o ing and Measu emen :
Implemen KPIs o measu e he
pe o mance o BPM p ojec s,
using he da a o d i e decision-
making and con inuous
imp o emen .
Awa eness and Unde s anding o
BPM
Desc ip ion: O ganiza ions a his
s age ha e begun o ecognize he
impo ance o BPM. P ocess
imp o emen is ypically ad hoc,
eac i e, and uns uc u ed.
O ganiza ion ecognizes BPM as a
po en ial alue-add and begins o
unde s and i s p inciples and bene i s.
Iden i ica ion: I BPM is a new
concep o i he e is limi ed
unde s anding o p ocess
managemen p inciples o ganiza ion-
wide, i 's likely a his s age.
Mo ing Fo wa d: In oduce o mal
BPM aining and es ablish a sense o
u gency o p ocess imp o emen .
Focus: Educa ion on BPM
impo ance and i s impac on
pe o mance.
Educa ion a nd Co mmunica ion:
Conduc wo kshops and aining
sessions o educa e s akeholde s
abou he bene i s and p inciples
o BPM.
Visible Execu i e Suppo :
Secu e and showcase execu i e
endo semen o highligh he
impo ance o BPM wi hin he
o ganiza ion.
Case S udies and Success
S o ies: Sha e case s udies o
success ul BPM implemen a ions
o illus a e po en ial gains and
encou age buy-in.
S age #1
S age #2
S age #3
30
APPENDIX C - EXPERT QUESTIONNAIRE
1. In you expe ience, wha a e he key elemen s o ocus on du ing he BPM adop ion?
2. How would you desc ibe he mos e ec i e me hods o in oduce BPM concep s o
he o ganiza ion?
3. Wha ole do you see o leade ship in BPM adop ion?
4. Do you expec any challenges du ing implemen a ion o BPM? How can hey be
mi iga ed?
5. Wha a e he mos c i ical success ac o s o BPM adop ion ha you belie e should
be p io i ized?
6. I you can apply a decision engine model o BPM, wha ea u es do you hink would
help you he mos ? Wha o a oid and how o s uc u e be e ?
7. How do you iew he po en ial ole o AI in BPM, especially in iden i ying and
edesigning business p ocesses?
8. F om you pe spec i e, wha ypes o da a sou ces can be used o he decision
engine? Would ex e nal inpu s like cus ome eedback add alue?
9. Should a BPM ool balance da a-d i en insigh s wi h human judgmen ? O be pu ely
echnical?
31