scieee Open visual document viewer

Critical success factors in BPM implementation: Creating AI supported decision engine for the business

Lipov, Victor

Abstract

In today's rapidly evolving business environment, achieving operational efficiency, transparency, and market responsiveness is crucial for success. Business Process Management (BPM) is a critical tool in this pursuit, encompassing the design, configuration, enactment, and analysis of business processes to drive continuous improvement. Recent advancements in Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models offer new opportunities to enhance BPM through improved decision-making and progress-tracking capabilities. However, there is a significant gap in the literature concerning the systematic development of AI-powered decision engines to support BPM implementation. This thesis addresses this gap by partially employing Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) with some limitations described in the document to develop a decision engine artifact tailored for BPM adoption. The research utilizes concept of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) essential for BPM, incorporating AI to automate and optimize decision-making processes. The methodology involves a thorough literature review, the conceptualization and design of a decision engine model, and the development of a prototype. This prototype is evaluated through expert reviews, providing critical insights into its effectiveness and practical applicability. The findings indicate that the integration of AI, particularly GPT models, can significantly enhance BPM by providing dynamic insights and automating complex decision-making processes. The developed decision engine prototype offers a structured approach to BPM adoption, tailored to different organizational stages and supported by a comprehensive list of CSFs. This research contributes to both academic knowledge and practical applications, offering a foundational framework for organizations to enhance their BPM efforts and advance the dialogue on data-driven decision-making in business process implementation.

Full text

Mas e Deg ee P og am in In o ma ion Sys ems and Technologies Managemen C i ical success ac o s in BPM implemen a ion: C ea ing AI suppo ed decision engine o he business. Vic o Lipo Mas e Thesis p esen ed as pa ial equi emen o ob aining he Mas e Deg ee in In o ma ion Managemen NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School Ins i u o Supe io de Es a ís ica e Ges ão de In o mação Uni e sidade No a de Lisboa MGI NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School Ins i u o Supe io de Es a ís ica e Ges ão de In o mação Uni e sidade No a de Lisboa C i ical success ac o s in BPM implemen a ion: C ea ing AI suppo ed decision engine o he business. by Vic o Lipo Mas e Thesis p esen ed as he pa ial equi emen o ob aining a Mas e 's deg ee in In o ma ion Managemen , specializa ion in In o ma ion Sys ems and Technologies Managemen Supe ised by Ped o Manuel Maia Mal a, PhD NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School July, 2024 i STATEMENT OF INTEGRITY I he eby decla e ha ing conduc ed his academic wo k wi h in eg i y. I con i m ha I ha e no used plagia ism o any o m o undue use o in o ma ion o alsi ica ion o esul s along he p ocess leading o i s elabo a ion. I u he decla e ha I ha e ully acknowledged he Rules o Conduc and Code o Hono om he NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School. [Lisboa, 13/07/2024] ii ABSTRACT In oday's apidly e ol ing business en i onmen , achie ing ope a ional e iciency, anspa ency, and ma ke esponsi eness is c ucial o success. Business P ocess Managemen (BPM) is a c i ical ool in his pu sui , encompassing he design, con igu a ion, enac men , and analysis o business p ocesses o d i e con inuous imp o emen . Recen ad ancemen s in Gene a i e P e- ained T ans o me (GPT) models o e new oppo uni ies o enhance BPM h ough imp o ed decision-making and p og ess- acking capabili ies. Howe e , he e is a signi ican gap in he li e a u e conce ning he sys ema ic de elopmen o AI-powe ed decision engines o suppo BPM implemen a ion. This hesis add esses his gap by pa ially employing Design Science Resea ch Me hodology (DSRM) wi h some limi a ions desc ibed in he documen o de elop a decision engine a i ac ailo ed o BPM adop ion. The esea ch u ilizes concep o C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) essen ial o BPM, inco po a ing AI o au oma e and op imize decision-making p ocesses. The me hodology in ol es a ho ough li e a u e e iew, he concep ualiza ion and design o a decision engine model, and he de elopmen o a p o o ype. This p o o ype is e alua ed h ough expe e iews, p o iding c i ical insigh s in o i s e ec i eness and p ac ical applicabili y. The indings indica e ha he in eg a ion o AI, pa icula ly GPT models, can signi ican ly enhance BPM by p o iding dynamic insigh s and au oma ing complex decision-making p ocesses. The de eloped decision engine p o o ype o e s a s uc u ed app oach o BPM adop ion, ailo ed o di e en o ganiza ional s ages and suppo ed by a comp ehensi e lis o CSFs. This esea ch con ibu es o bo h academic knowledge and p ac ical applica ions, o e ing a ounda ional amewo k o o ganiza ions o enhance hei BPM e o s and ad ance he dialogue on da a-d i en decision-making in business p ocess implemen a ion. KEYWORDS Business P ocess Managemen ; A i icial In elligence; Decision Engine; C i ical Success Fac o s Sus ainable De elopmen Goals (SDG): iii TABLE OF CONTENTS S a emen o In eg i y ...................................................................................................... i Abs ac ............................................................................................................................ ii Lis o Figu es .................................................................................................................... Lis o Tables .................................................................................................................... i Lis o Abb e ia ions and Ac onyms ............................................................................... ii 1. In oduc ion ................................................................................................................ 1 2. Li e a u e e iew ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1. Key Concep s and De ini ions o AI- ela ed hings ............................................. 2 2.1.1. A i icial In elligence (AI) .............................................................................. 2 2.1.2. La ge Language Models (LLMs) ..................................................................... 2 2.1.3. GPT (Gene a i e P e- ained T ans o me ) .................................................. 3 2.1.4. Business P ocess Managemen (BPM) .......................................................... 3 2.1.5. C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) ...................................................................... 3 2.1.6. Decision Engine ............................................................................................. 3 2.1.7. Sen imen Analysis ........................................................................................ 3 2.2. De ailed Explana ions o AI Componen s ............................................................ 3 2.2.1. Machine Lea ning (ML) ................................................................................. 3 2.2.2. Na u al Language P ocessing (NLP) .............................................................. 4 2.2.3. Deep Lea ning ............................................................................................... 4 2.3. Iden i ica ion o cu en s a e o bpm adop ion o legal en i y ........................... 4 2.4. Role o AI in BPM ................................................................................................. 6 3. Me hodology .............................................................................................................. 9 3.1. P oblem Iden i ica ion ......................................................................................... 9 3.2. Objec i es o a Solu ion ....................................................................................... 9 3.3. Design and De elopmen ..................................................................................... 9 3.4. Summa y o An icipa ed Ou comes ................................................................... 10 4. Empi ical S udy ......................................................................................................... 12 4.1. App oach o decision engine p o o ype ............................................................ 12 4.2. Decision engine p o o ype ................................................................................. 13 4.3. Simula ed Example o p ac ical applica ion. ...................................................... 16 5. Resul s and discussion .............................................................................................. 19 5.1. Exposi ion o Empi ical Resul s .......................................................................... 19 i 5.2. Valida ion o Empi ical Resul s .......................................................................... 19 5.2.1. CEO ............................................................................................................. 20 5.2.2. CFO .............................................................................................................. 20 5.2.3. Manage ...................................................................................................... 21 5.2.4. Summa y o he eedback: .......................................................................... 21 5.3. Discussion .......................................................................................................... 22 5.4. DE P o o ype Implemen a ion Adjus men s Based on Expe Sugges ions ....... 22 6. Conclusions and u u e wo ks ................................................................................... 24 6.1. Syn hesis o he Wo k Done wi h Highligh o he Recommenda ions Made ... 24 6.1.1. Key Recommenda ions: .............................................................................. 24 6.2. Limi a ions o he Wo k Done ............................................................................ 25 6.3. Fu he Wo k Possible o Do .............................................................................. 25 Bibliog aphical Re e enczoes ......................................................................................... 26 Appendix A - E hics Commi ee Repo ......................................................................... 28 Appendix B – Decision engine p o o ype ...................................................................... 29 Appendix C - Expe Ques ionnai e ............................................................................... 30 LIST OF FIGURES Figu e 2.4.1 - BPM li ecycle en iched wi h AI ............................................................................ 7 Figu e 4.1.1 - DE p o o ype logic ............................................................................................. 12 Figu e 4.2.1 - BPM Adop ion S age P og ession ...................................................................... 15 Figu e 4.2.2 - CSF Sco ing App oach ........................................................................................ 15 i LIST OF TABLES Table 2.3.1 - Top 10 ac o s a ec ing BMP implemen a ion (Cas o e al., 2019) .................... 5 Table 2.3.2 - CSFs o di e en s ages o BPM adop ion (Buh e al., 2015) ............................... 6 Table 4.2.1 - BPM Adop ion S ages ......................................................................................... 13 Table 4.2.2 - C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) o S age 1 .......................................................... 14 Table 4.3.1 - BPM adop ion simula ion ................................................................................... 16 Table 5.4.1 - DE adjus men s based on eedback .................................................................... 22 ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AI A i icial In elligence BPM Business P ocess Managemen CSF C i ical Success Fac o s DSRM Design Science Resea ch Me hodology GPT Gene a i e P e- ained T ans o me LLM La ge Language Models NLP Na u al Language P ocessing ROI Re u n on In es men SDG Sus ainable De elopmen Goals DE Decision Engine 7 domains and asks (Teubne e al., 2023) and GPT-like models, ha e signi ican ly enhanced he abili y o analyze and iden i y bo h explici and implici p ocesses wi hin an o ganiza ion. I means ha you can apply GPT-like models o s uc u ed and uns uc u ed da a o dig he p ocesses o de elop solu ion o he p oblem. In he esea ch done by (Weinzie l e al., 2024), he e a e h ee equen examples o using ML: • p o iding decision suppo h ough p edic ions • disco e ing accu a e p ocess models • imp o ing esou ce alloca ion. Keeping his in mind, esea che s ha e de eloped se e al BPM-speci ic solu ions ha ex ac in o ma ion om ex ual documen s using Na u al Language P ocessing echniques. (G ohs e al., 2023) In his esea ch, G ohs e al., 2023 illus a ed how LLM can be u ilized o p ac ical BPM asks which equi ed ex ual documen s as inpu . Cha GPT4 was u ilized o his ask. Fo all h ee asks, GPT4 pe o ms simila ly o o be e han he benchma k, i.e., speci ic applica ions o he espec i e ask (G ohs e al., 2023). The e a e also inc easing numbe o se ices o Con e be ween P ocess Models and Na u al Language Tex u ilizing g aphical modeling languages. I allows s akeholde s o collec i ely desc ibe execu able business p ocesses on a concep ual le el. (F ey ag e al., n.d.). Comp ehensi e li e a u e e iew being done on he opic o “Machine lea ning in business p ocess managemen ” by (Weinzie l e al., 2024). Resul ed in en iched BPM li ecycle BPM li ecycle o Dumas e al. (2018). Which gi es highe le el p ac ical iew pe spec i e on he a eas, whe e AI can be applied. Figu e 2.4.1 - BPM li ecycle en iched wi h AI 8 F om he pe spec i e o ou esea ch, i helps o unde s and be e he ongoing p ocesses in he o ganiza ion and ack he p ocesses which a e adop ed o BPM. Machine Lea ning (ML) has been pa icula ly use ul in imp o ing ce ain pa s o Business P ocess Managemen (BPM). These imp o emen s mos ly happen in a eas whe e he e is a lo o da a, such as disco e ing new p ocesses, analyzing hem, and keeping an eye on hem o e ime. In hese a eas, da a abou business ac i i ies is usually a ailable in de ailed eco ds, which ML can easily use (Sa ke , 2021; Weinzie l e al., 2024). Howe e , esea che s sugges ha we could make e en mo e p og ess by using echniques om ields like na u al language p ocessing (NLP) and compu e ision. NLP helps compu e s unde s and and wo k wi h human language, while compu e ision helps hem unde s and images and ideos. By combining hese echniques wi h ML, we could c ea e new and be e ways o manage business p ocesses ha go beyond jus using da a logs. This could lead o inno a i e solu ions ha a e mo e e ec i e and e sa ile. Weinzie l e al., 2024 also p opose o conside he en e p ise p ocess ne wo k ins ead o isola ed business p ocesses. In doing ha , ML applica ions ecei e inpu da a om mul iple da a sou ces, including con ol- low in o ma ion om di e en business p ocesses and p ocess con ex in o ma ion ela ed o he business p ocesses. Le e aging LLMs and GPT models acili a es comp ehensi e p ocess iden i ica ion, dynamic oadmap de elopmen , eal- ime implemen a ion moni o ing, and he acking o quali a i e me ics. These capabili ies add ess signi ican gaps in adi ional BPM app oaches, pa ing he way o mo e e ec i e and e icien sys ems. By con inuously in eg a ing AI-d i en insigh s, o ganiza ions can ensu e hei BPM ini ia i es a e no only success ul bu also adap able o u u e challenges and oppo uni ies (G ohs e al., 2023; Weinzie l e al., 2024). In addi ion o adi ional pe o mance me ics, acking quali a i e me ics such as sen imen and in ol emen (how people eel and how in ol ed hey a e in hei wo k) is i al o comp ehensi e BPM e alua ion. AI echnologies, including sen imen analysis and engagemen acking ools, can analyze quali a i e da a o p o ide deepe insigh s in o employee mo ale, cus ome sa is ac ion, and o e all o ganiza ional engagemen . These insigh s p o ide a deepe unde s anding o he wo kplace a mosphe e and cus ome expe iences, allowing o ganiza ions o pinpoin a eas ha need imp o emen and ake speci ic ac ions o enhance o e all BPM esul s. 9 3. METHODOLOGY This sec ion ou lines he me hodology adop ed o his esea ch, aiming o iden i y and u ilize C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) wi hin BPM o de elop a decision engine a i ac ha suppo s BPM implemen a ion. The ini ial idea was o apply Design Science Resea ch Me hodology (DSRM) as a amewo k o his s udy (Hasan & Sha i zadeh, 2020; Hunzike & Blankenagel, 2024). Howe e , due o he lack o access o a eal-wo ld company, i was no easible o accomplish s ages o DSRM such as Demons a ion and E alua ion ully. Ne e heless, some pa s o DSRM we e applied, such as P oblem Iden i ica ion, Objec i es o a Solu ion, Design and De elopmen . De ailed desc ip ion p o ided below: 3.1. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Objec i e: The p ima y goal a his s age is o iden i y he cu en challenges and gaps in BPM implemen a ion. This in ol es a deep di e in o exis ing li e a u e and esea ch o pinpoin a eas whe e BPM p ac ices a e lacking, pa icula ly ocusing on he sys ema ic de elopmen o AI-suppo ed decision engines. The objec i e is o es ablish a clea unde s anding o he p oblems aced by o ganiza ions in adop ing and op imizing BPM sys ems. App oach: A comp ehensi e li e a u e e iew was conduc ed o ga he insigh s in o he cu en s a e o BPM adop ion, common challenges, and he po en ial ole o AI in enhancing BPM. This in ol ed analyzing a ious schola ly a icles, indus y epo s, and case s udies o iden i y ecu ing hemes and issues. The li e a u e e iew also included an examina ion o exis ing AI echnologies and hei applica ions in BPM, p o iding a ounda ional unde s anding o how AI can be le e aged o add ess iden i ied challenges. A his s age we iden i ied impo ance o CSFs o BPM adop ion as well as b eakdown o BPM adop ion o di e en S ages (s a es o o ganiza ion). 3.2. OBJECTIVES OF A SOLUTION Objec i e: The nex s ep is o de ine he goals and equi emen s o he AI-suppo ed decision engine. This in ol es se ing clea , measu able objec i es ha he decision engine aims o achie e. The objec i e is o ensu e ha he p oposed solu ion add esses he iden i ied challenges and gaps in BPM implemen a ion e ec i ely. App oach: Insigh s om he li e a u e e iew and expe in e iews we e u ilized o ou line he objec i es. The objec i es we e e ined h ough i e a i e eedback, ensu ing hey a e aligned wi h he needs o o ganiza ions and he capabili ies o AI echnologies. This app oach ensu ed ha he solu ion is bo h heo e ically sound and p ac ically ele an . 3.3. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT Objec i e: The p ima y goal he e is o de elop he decision engine a i ac based on he iden i ied CSFs and he de ined objec i es. This in ol es a de ailed design and 10 de elopmen p ocess, ensu ing ha he decision engine is obus , scalable, and capable o add essing he iden i ied challenges in BPM implemen a ion. S age 1: Iden i ica ion o Cu en S a e o BPM Adop ion App oach: The cu en BPM adop ion s age o he o ganiza ion was assessed using a s uc u ed amewo k. This amewo k was de i ed om he esea ch o Buh e al. (2015), which ca ego izes BPM adop ion in o a ious s ages and iden i ies associa ed CSFs o each s age. S age 2: Iden i y CSFs o Respec i e S a e App oach: The lis o c i ical success ac o s (CSFs) was condensed om Buh e al. (2015) esea ch o ocus on he mos ele an ac o s o each BPM adop ion s age. This in ol ed p io i izing CSFs ha ha e he highes impac on BPM success and a e mos applicable o he o ganiza ion's cu en s a e. This p ocess included: • Re iewing he de ailed desc ip ions and jus i ica ions o each CSF. • E alua ing hei applicabili y based on he o ganiza ion's speci ic con ex and needs. • Engaging wi h subjec ma e expe s o alida e he selec ion and p io i iza ion o CSFs. S age 3: De elop a Sco ing App oach o Respec i e S a e App oach: The sco ing app oach was de eloped wi h he suppo o GPT-4 h ough a se ies o p omp s and p ac ical expe ience. This p ocess in ol ed: • De ining clea c i e ia o each CSF based on li e a u e and expe inpu . • De eloping a a ing scale (e.g., 1 o 5) o each c i e ion o quan i y he le el o achie emen o pe o mance. • Tes ing he sco ing app oach h ough simula ed scena ios and expe alida ion o ensu e i s eliabili y and alidi y. P omp s example: • Please sugges lis o c i e ia which can be used o sco ing {p oposed sco ing app oach}. • Wha kind o scales can be applied o {measu emen c i e ia}. Responses we e c i ically analyzed and adop ed o he opic. S age 4: C i ical E alua ion App oach: In e iews wi h expe s ac oss di e en le els o he co po a e hie a chy we e conduc ed o e alua e he p o o ype om a ious pe spec i es. This included: • Conduc ing s uc u ed in e iews wi h CEO le el, CFO le el and line manage s o ga he di e se insigh s. • Analyzing he eedback o iden i y common hemes, s eng hs, and a eas o imp o emen in he decision engine. 3.4. SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED OUTCOMES The an icipa ed ou comes o his esea ch include: 11 • A lis o C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) o BPM implemen a ion, ailo ed o di e en s ages o BPM adop ion. • A heo e ical model o an AI-suppo ed decision engine ha inco po a es hese CSFs, p o iding a s uc u ed app oach o enhance BPM p ac ices. • C i ical insigh s om expe s ac oss di e en le els o expe ise in BPM. This esea ch aspi es o con ibu e o bo h academic knowledge and p ac ical applica ions in BPM. By p o iding a ounda ional amewo k o AI-enhanced BPM implemen a ion, i aims o suppo o ganiza ions in achie ing highe le els o ope a ional e iciency, anspa ency, and ma ke esponsi eness. 12 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 4.1. APPROACH TO DECISION ENGINE PROTOTYPE De elopmen o Decision Engine (DE) can add ess complexi y and add anspa ency o he p ocess o BPM adop ion. As pe de ini ion, decision engines a e sophis ica ed so wa e sys ems designed o au oma e he decision-making p ocesses wi hin an o ganiza ion. I ope a es by analyzing inpu da a h ough a se o p ede ined ules, algo i hms, o machine lea ning models o make decisions o ecommenda ions wi hou human in e en ion (pu ely based on a ailable da a). These engines a e pa icula ly aluable in scena ios whe e as , consis en , and accu a e decisions a e c ucial, such as in c edi sco ing, aud de ec ion, cus ome se ice, and many o he ope a ional p ocesses. Fo his pape , we decided s ep aside om gene alized ac o s and align decision engine wi h di e en s ages o BPM adop ion. To do his, we de eloped he p o o ype in he ollowing logic: Figu e 4.1.1 - DE p o o ype logic The idea behind is ha be o e we s a , we should unde s and whe e we a e now. When we unde s and whe e we a e, we can decide wha o do nex and how o do i . 13 4.2. DECISION ENGINE PROTOTYPE F om ou pe spec i e decision engine p o o ype should be adop able and p ac ical. I should guide he end use h ough he di e en s ages; he e o e, i should help answe ing wo ini ial ques ions: • Whe e he o ganiza ion is now? • Wha should i do nex ? To answe o he i s ques ion he p o o ype includes desc ip ion o BPM adop ion s ages as pe Buh e al., 2015. Iden i ica ion, and Mo ing o wa d ac ions we e de i ed wi h suppo o Cha GPT4 using p omp s like: • based on you expe ience, how can o ganiza ion be iden i ied a {S age} • please sugges possible ac ions o he o ganiza ion o ad ance u he and summa ized o he able below: Table 4.2.1 - BPM Adop ion S ages S age Desc ip ion Iden i ica ion Mo ing Fo wa d Ac ions Awa eness and Unde s anding o BPM O ganiza ions ecognize he impo ance o BPM. P ocess imp o emen is ad hoc, eac i e, and uns uc u ed. BPM is a new concep o he e is limi ed unde s anding o p ocess managemen p inciples o ganiza ion-wide. In oduce o mal BPM aining and es ablish a sense o u gency o p ocess imp o emen . Desi e o Adop BPM O ganiza ions a e mo i a ed o adop BPM and a e beginning o plan hei ini ia i es. Managemen shows in e es in BPM, and ini ial esou ces a e alloca ed. Secu e op managemen suppo , appoin a p ojec champion, and de ine business d i e s. BPM P ojec s O ganiza ions execu e speci ic BPM p ojec s wi h de ined objec i es and plans. Clea objec i es, plans, and ex e nal consul an guidance a e in place. Communica e objec i es, seek p o essional guidance, and mo i a e eam membe s. BPM P og am BPM is in eg a ed in o he o ganiza ion’s b oade s a egy and p og ams. Con inuous op managemen suppo , p o essional guidance, and e ec i e communica ion a e e iden . Ensu e ongoing suppo , main ain consul an pa ne ships, and iden i y KPIs. P oduc iza ion o BPM BPM p ac ices a e s anda dized and Key pe o mance indica o s (KPIs) a e Focus on aining, secu ing op 14 p oduc ized wi hin he o ganiza ion. de ined, employees a e educa ed and mo i a ed, and BPM is embedded in decision-making. managemen endo semen , and e ining p ocesses based on KPIs. Fo example: S age 1: Awa eness and Unde s anding o BPM • Desc ip ion: O ganiza ions a his s age ha e begun o ecognize he impo ance o BPM. P ocess imp o emen is ypically ad hoc, eac i e, and uns uc u ed. The o ganiza ion ecognizes BPM as a po en ial alue-add and begins o unde s and i s p inciples and bene i s. • Iden i ica ion: I BPM is a new concep o i he e is limi ed unde s anding o p ocess managemen p inciples o ganiza ion-wide, i 's likely a his s age. • Mo ing Fo wa d: In oduce o mal BPM aining and es ablish a sense o u gency o p ocess imp o emen . I he desc ip ion ma ches he ype o o ganiza ion, he o ganiza ion can become awa e o ocus poin s and sugges ions ele an o he s age. In ou example: • Focus: Educa ion on BPM impo ance and i s impac on pe o mance. • Educa ion and Communica ion: Conduc wo kshops and aining sessions o educa e s akeholde s abou he bene i s and p inciples o BPM. • Visible Execu i e Suppo : Secu e and showcase execu i e endo semen o highligh he impo ance o BPM wi hin he o ganiza ion. • Case S udies and Success S o ies: Sha e case s udies o success ul BPM implemen a ions o illus a e po en ial gains and encou age buy-in. The same applies o po en ial p oblems. As a esul , he o ganiza ion ge s a lis o CSFs o conside . In ou example, o he i s s age o BPM adop ion, CSFs include empowe men o employees, cus ome ocus, and openness o changes (Buh e al., 2015). Table 4.2.2 - C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) o S age 1 CSF Focus Poin s Ac ions Empowe men o Employees T aining and wo kshops o enhance unde s anding o BPM. Conduc mon hly BPM aining sessions and in e ac i e wo kshops. 15 Cus ome Focus Implemen eedback loops o align p ocesses wi h cus ome needs. In oduce su eys and eedback o ms pos -cus ome in e ac ions. Openness o Changes Encou age a cul u e o adap abili y and con inuous imp o emen . De elop and communica e a s uc u ed change managemen plan, implemen a ecogni ion p og am o success ul changes. By knowing CSFs, he o ganiza ion can de elop sco ing app oaches, measu emen c i e ia, scales, e c. Below is a lowcha ep esen ing he p og ession h ough di e en s ages o BPM adop ion, highligh ing key ac ions and ocus poin s a each s age. Figu e 4.2.1 - BPM Adop ion S age P og ession A ada cha showing he sco ing o di e en CSFs helps isualize he s eng hs and a eas o imp o emen o each ac o . Figu e 4.2.2 - CSF Sco ing App oach Including hese ables and cha s enhances he cla i y and p ac icali y o he p o o ype, making i easie o o ganiza ions o na iga e h ough he s ages o BPM adop ion. 16 4.3. SIMULATED EXAMPLE OF PRACTICAL APPLICATION. Wi h he suppo o Cha GPT4 we ha e done se ies o p ac ical simula ions on how i can be applied o he eal-wo ld scena ios. Company P o ile: Name: Tech Inno a o s Inc. Indus y: Technology Solu ions Cu en BPM Adop ion S age: Awa eness and Unde s anding o BPM The company decides o s a BPM adop ion smoo hly by ocusing on wo key p ocesses: he Cus ome Suppo P ocess and he P oduc De elopmen P ocess. P omp s used: • Please gene a e lis o possible asks o {s ep} o {ac ion / ask} o {s age} • Wha possible esul s/ ou comes can be o {s ep} o {ac ion / ask} o {s age} Table 4.3.1 - BPM adop ion simula ion S ep Ac ion/Task Expec ed Resul 1. Ini ial Assessmen Su eys Conduc in e nal su eys o ga he insigh s om employees. Clea unde s anding o cu en BPM knowledge and engagemen . In e iews Conduc in e iews wi h key s akeholde s. Iden i y pain poin s and oppo uni ies o imp o emen . Documen Re iew Analyze exis ing p ocess documen a ion, aining eco ds, and pe o mance me ics. Iden i y gaps and a eas needing enhancemen . Ou come The assessmen e ealed ha while he e was an acknowledgmen o he need o BPM, he p ocess imp o emen ini ia i es we e ad hoc, eac i e, and uns uc u ed. This placed Tech Inno a o s in he "Awa eness and Unde s anding o BPM" s age. 2. De ine CSFs Empowe men o Employees Enhance employees' unde s anding o BPM and encou age con ibu ions. Imp o ed employee engagemen and pa icipa ion in BPM ini ia i es. Cus ome Focus Implemen mechanisms o ga he and ac on cus ome eedback. Be e alignmen o cus ome needs wi h suppo p ocesses. 23 cus ome eedback, and os e adap abili y. and inc eased lexibili y. clea inancial me ics. inancial cla i y, and adap abili y. De elop Sco ing App oach De elop c i e ia and a ing scales o each CSF based on li e a u e and expe inpu . S uc u ed e alua ion o BPM e ec i eness. Manage : Ensu e sco ing is simple and ac ionable. P ac ical and easy- o-apply sco ing sys em o e alua ing BPM e ec i eness. Implemen Decision Engine Conduc BPM aining sessions, in oduce eedback mechanisms, and communica e change managemen plans. Inc eased unde s anding o BPM, enhanced cus ome eedback in eg a ion, and highe adap abili y o change. CEO: Balance AI insigh s wi h human in e ac ion; CFO: Ensu e cos - bene i analysis; Manage : Suppo ca ee de elopmen . Imp o ed BPM unde s anding, be e eedback in eg a ion, cos - e ec i e decisions, and enhanced employee g ow h. E alua ion and Resul s Measu e imp o emen s in employee engagemen , cus ome sa is ac ion, and adap abili y. Demons a ed imp o emen s in BPM p ac ices and s akeholde engagemen . CFO: Include inancial KPIs; Manage : Regula eedback sessions. Comp ehensi e e alua ion showing enhanced BPM p ac ices, inancial pe o mance, and s akeholde engagemen . This esea ch con ibu es o bo h academic discou se and p ac ical applica ions in BPM. By de eloping and alida ing an AI-suppo ed decision engine p o o ype, i o e s a ounda ional amewo k o o ganiza ions o enhance hei BPM e o s. The amewo k can be used in any ype o o ganiza ion and on di e en s ages o de elopmen , bu p ac ical applica ion should be suppo ed by u he esea ches. The in eg a ion o AI echnologies and human-cen ic design p inciples ensu es ha BPM ini ia i es a e e ec i e, adap able, and aligned wi h o ganiza ional goals. Fu u e esea ch could ocus on e ining he decision engine based on b oade indus y eedback and explo ing i s applica ion in di e en o ganiza ional se ings. 24 6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORKS In his inal chap e , we syn hesize he wo k done in his esea ch, highligh he ecommenda ions made, discuss he limi a ions encoun e ed, and sugges possible di ec ions o u he esea ch. 6.1. SYNTHESIS OF THE WORK DONE WITH HIGHLIGHT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS MADE This hesis explo ed he in eg a ion o AI-suppo ed decision engines in o Business P ocess Managemen (BPM) o enhance BPM adop ion and implemen a ion. The p ima y con ibu ions o his esea ch a e: Li e a u e Re iew: A comp ehensi e li e a u e e iew iden i ied C i ical Success Fac o s (CSFs) c ucial o BPM implemen a ion and examined he ole o AI, pa icula ly La ge Language Models (LLMs) like GPT, in BPM. De elopmen o a Decision Engine P o o ype: Using some o he componen s o Design Science Resea ch Me hodology, we de eloped a decision engine p o o ype ailo ed o di e en s ages o BPM adop ion. The engine was designed o guide o ganiza ions h ough awa eness, adop ion, p ojec execu ion, and p oduc iza ion s ages, p o iding s age- speci ic ecommenda ions. Empi ical S udy: The p o o ype was es ed h ough a simula ed case s udy o Tech Inno a o s Inc., demons a ing i s p ac ical applica ion and e ec i eness in imp o ing BPM p ac ices. Expe Valida ion: In e iews wi h indus y expe s alida ed he app oach and p o ided c i ical eedback o imp o emen . The ecommenda ions om expe s included managing expec a ions, inco po a ing inancial me ics, ensu ing clea communica ion, and balancing AI-d i en insigh s wi h human judgmen . 6.1.1. Key Recommenda ions: Realis ic Communica ion: Clea ly communica e he bene i s and limi a ions o BPM o a oid o e hyping and o build a solid ounda ion. Leade ship Commi men : Ensu e s ong and empa he ic leade ship o d i e BPM ini ia i es. Financial Me ics: In eg a e inancial pe o mance me ics o demons a e ROI and secu e execu i e suppo . Human In e ac ion: Balance AI insigh s wi h human-cen ic ea u es o build us and acili a e engagemen . 25 T aining and Educa ion: Conduc p ac ical aining and wo kshops o enhance employee unde s anding. 6.2. LIMITATIONS OF THE WORK DONE Se e al limi a ions we e encoun e ed du ing his esea ch: Lack o Real-Wo ld Company Access: The inabili y o access a eal-wo ld company limi ed he scope o empi ical alida ion. The simula ed case s udy p o ided aluable insigh s bu lacked he complexi y o eal-wo ld implemen a ion. Scope o Expe In e iews: While expe eedback was c ucial, he sample size was small. A b oade ange o indus y pe spec i es could p o ide mo e comp ehensi e alida ion. P o o ype Tes ing: The decision engine p o o ype was es ed in a con olled en i onmen . Real-wo ld es ing migh e eal addi ional challenges and a eas o e inemen . 6.3. FURTHER WORK POSSIBLE TO DO Fu u e esea ch could add ess he limi a ions and expand on he indings o his hesis: Real-Wo ld Implemen a ion: Conduc case s udies wi h eal-wo ld companies o alida e and e ine he decision engine p o o ype in di e se o ganiza ional se ings. B oade Expe Feedback: Engage wi h a la ge and mo e di e se g oup o indus y expe s o ob ain comp ehensi e alida ion and insigh s. Ad anced AI In eg a ion: Explo e he in eg a ion o mo e ad anced AI echniques, such as ein o cemen lea ning and hyb id AI models, o enhance he decision engine's capabili ies. Longi udinal S udies: Conduc longi udinal s udies o assess he long- e m impac o AI- suppo ed decision engines on BPM adop ion and pe o mance. Cus omiza ion o Di e en Indus ies: De elop indus y-speci ic e sions o he decision engine o add ess unique challenges and equi emen s in sec o s such as heal hca e, inance, and manu ac u ing. By add essing he limi a ions and pu suing u he esea ch, we can con inue o ad ance he ield and suppo o ganiza ions in achie ing g ea e ope a ional e iciency and ma ke esponsi eness. 26 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCZOES Buh, B., Ko ačič, A., & Indiha Š embe ge , M. (2015). C i ical success ac o s o di e en s ages o business p ocess managemen adop ion – a case s udy. Economic Resea ch- Ekonomska Is aži anja, 28(1), 243–258. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1041776 Cas o, B. K. D. A., D esch, A., & Vei , D. R. (2019). Key c i ical success ac o s o BPM implemen a ion: A heo e ical and p ac ical iew. Business P ocess Managemen Jou nal, 26(1), 239–256. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2018-0272 Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reije s, H. A. (2018). Fundamen als o Business P ocess Managemen . Sp inge Be lin Heidelbe g. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-662-56509- 4 F ey ag, T., Kanzle , B., Lege , N., & Semling, D. (n.d.). NLP as a Se ice: An API o Con e be ween P ocess Models and Na u al Language Tex . G ohs, M., Abb, L., Elsayed, N., & Rehse, J.-R. (2023). La ge Language Models can accomplish Business P ocess Managemen Tasks (a Xi :2307.09923). a Xi . h p://a xi .o g/abs/2307.09923 Han, J., Pei, J., & Tong, H. (2022). Da a mining: Concep s and echniques. Mo gan kau mann. Hasan, R., & Sha i zadeh, R. (2020). Design Science Resea ch Me hodology As a Solu ion- O ien ed Me hodology. Hunzike , S., & Blankenagel, M. (2024). Design Science Resea ch Design (pp. 97–116). h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-658-42739-9_6 Khu ana, D., Koli, A., Kha e , K., & Singh, S. (2023). Na u al language p ocessing: S a e o he a , cu en ends and challenges. Mul imedia Tools and Applica ions, 82(3), 3713– 3744. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4 Liu, B. (2020). In oduc ion. In Sen imen Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sen imen s, and Emo ions (pp. 1–17). Camb idge Uni e si y P ess. Sa ke , I. H. (2021). Machine Lea ning: Algo i hms, Real-Wo ld Applica ions and Resea ch Di ec ions. SN Compu e Science, 2(3), 160. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s42979-021- 00592-x Teubne , T., Fla h, C. M., Weinha d , C., Van De Aals , W., & Hinz, O. (2023). Welcome o he E a o Cha GPT e al.: The P ospec s o La ge Language Models. Business & In o ma ion Sys ems Enginee ing, 65(2), 95–101. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s12599-023-00795-x an de Aa, H., Ca mona, J., Leopold, H., Mendling, J., & Pad ó, L. (2018, Augus ). Challenges and Oppo uni ies o Applying Na u al Language P ocessing in Business P ocess Managemen . Van De Aals , W. M. P. (2013). Business P ocess Managemen : A Comp ehensi e Su ey. ISRN So wa e Enginee ing, 2013, 1–37. h ps://doi.o g/10.1155/2013/507984 Weinzie l, S., Zilke , S., Dunze , S., & Ma zne , M. (2024). Machine lea ning in business p ocess managemen : A sys ema ic li e a u e e iew. Expe Sys ems wi h Applica ions, 253, 124181. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124181 27 Weske, M. (2012). In oduc ion. In M. Weske (Ed.), Business P ocess Managemen : Concep s, Languages, A chi ec u es (pp. 3–23). Sp inge Be lin Heidelbe g. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-642-28616-2_1 Copeland, B. (2024). a i icial in elligence. Encyclopedia B i annica. h ps://www.b i annica.com/ echnology/a i icial-in elligence McDonough, M. (2024). la ge language model. Encyclopedia B i annica. Cha GPT4. (2024). Cha GPT. h ps://cha gp .com/ Amazon Web Se ices. (2024). Wha is GPT? Amazon. h ps://aws.amazon.com/wha -is/gp / 28 APPENDIX A - ETHICS COMMITTEE REPORT 29 APPENDIX B – DECISION ENGINE PROTOTYPE S age o BPM adop ion Focus poin s and sugges ions ele an o he s age Po en ial p oblems a he espec i e s age CSFs o add ess and me hods o use P oposed Sco ing app oach Measu men c i e ia Scale Da a sou ces Example o insigh and ecommenda ions Decision logic Empowe men o Employees: O e aining and wo kshops o imp o e employees' unde s anding o BPM and i s bene i s, and c ea e a sugges ion sys em ha enables hem o con ibu e ideas. Emplo yee Empowe men : Sco ing could be based on employee aining ini ia i es, he p esence o a sugges ions p og am, and he le el o au onomy employees ha e in hei oles. Numbe o BPM- ela ed aining sessions held. Employee pa icipa ion a e in BPM aining and wo kshops. Scale: 1 (No in ol emen ) o 5 (Full in ol emen and empowe men in BPM ac i i ies). In e nal sugges ion sys ems, HR eco ds. Ac ionable Insigh : Employees a e no sugges ing p ocess imp o emen s, indica ing a lack o empowe men . Recommenda ion: De elop and implemen an idea managemen sys em o cap u e employee sugges ions. Hold egula wo kshops and aining sessions o educa e employees on BPM p inciples. Encou age manage s o os e a cul u e ha alues inpu om all eam membe s. I he a e age sco e o employee empowe men is below 3, he decision engine ecommends p io i izing employee engagemen ini ia i es. Cus ome Focus: Implemen a eedback loop wi h cus ome s o unde s and hei needs and expec a ions, and in eg a e his eedback in o p ocess imp o emen plans. Cus ome Focus: Measu e he ex en o which cus ome eedback in luences p ocess changes and he alignmen o p ocesses o cus ome needs. Exis ence and u iliza ion o cus ome eedback mechanisms in p ocesses. Numbe o p ocess imp o emen s d i en by cus ome eedback. 1 (No in eg a ed) o 5 (Fully in eg a ed and d i ing BPM ini ia i es). Cus ome se ice eedback, p ocess documen a ion. I cus ome ocus is a ed high bu change openness is low, sugges s a egies o mo e esponsi e p ocess imp o emen s based on cus ome eedback. Openness o Changes: Encou age a cul u e ha alues adap abili y h ough egula communica ion abou he bene i s o change and ecogni ion o eams ha emb ace and lead success ul change ini ia i es. Openness o Change: Assess he o ganiza ion's his o y and eadiness o change, he exis ence o change managemen s a egies, and lexibili y in cu en p ocesses. Exis ence and u iliza ion o cus ome eedback mechanisms in p ocesses. Numbe o p ocess imp o emen s d i en by cus ome eedback. 1 (Resis an o any change) o 5 (Ac i ely emb aces change). Chang e log s, p ojec managemen ools. In ol emen and Full Suppo o Top Managemen : Ensu e ha op managemen no only endo ses bu is also ac i ely in ol ed in BPM ini ia i es by leading p ojec kick-o s and egula ly e iewing p og ess. Top Managemen In o l emen : Sco e based on isible suppo om leade ship, alloca ion o esou ces o BPM, and communica ion abou he impo ance o BPM om op managemen . F equency and consis ency o communica ion om op managemen ega ding BPM. In es men in BPM ini ia i es (budge , esou ces). 1 (No suppo ) o 5 (Highly isible and commi ed suppo ). Mee ing minu es, execu i e communica ions. Ac ionable Insigh : Top managemen in ol emen in BPM ini ia i es is minimal. Recommenda ion: Schedule egula BPM b ie ings o op managemen o epo on p og ess and alue. Appoin a senio execu i e as a BPM sponso o inc ease isibili y and commi men . C ea e a BPM s ee ing commi ee including op managemen o o e see ini ia i es. I op managemen suppo sco es less han 3, igge a ecommenda ion o execu i e wo kshops on BPM alue. I a p ojec champion is no iden i ied o sco es low, ecommend es ablishing a clea champion ole wi h de ined esponsibili ies and au ho i y. P ojec Champion: Appoin a espec ed leade wi hin he o ganiza ion o ac as a BPM champion who will ad oca e o and d i e BPM e o s. P ojec Champion P esence: E alua e he appoin men o p ojec champions o BPM ini ia i es and he au ho i y and esou ces gi en o hem. Iden i ica ion and ac i i y le el o BPM champions o p ocess owne s. Impac assessmen o p ojec champions on BPM p ojec s (p og ess, success s o ies). 1 (No champion) o 5 (S ong, e ec i e champion p omo ing BPM). P ojec documen a ion, s akeholde su eys. Business D i e s (a Sense o U gency): Iden i y and communica e he business impe a i es ha necessi a e BPM, such as ma ke p essu e o e iciency gains, o c ea e a sense o u gency o change. Sense o U gency/Business D i e s: De e mine whe he he e's a clea unde s anding ac oss he o ganiza ion o he need o BPM, d i en by compe i i e p essu e, e iciency goals, o o he business impe a i es. Documen a ion and communica ion o business impe a i es d i ing BPM adop ion. Response ime o c i ical p ocess- ela ed issues o ma ke changes. 1 (No d i e s iden i ied) o 5 (Clea d i e s iden i ied and communica ed wi h u gency). S a egic plans, in e nal communica ions. Clea ly De ined Objec i es and Plan: De elop a o mal p ojec cha e o each BPM p ojec ha ou lines i s objec i es, scope, expec ed bene i s, and imeline. P ojec Communica ion: Sco e he cla i y and equency o communica ion abou BPM p ojec goals, p og ess, and ou comes. Cla i y and dissemina ion o p ojec goals and miles ones ac oss he o ganiza ion. Numbe o documen ed and communica ed BPM p ojec plans. 1 (Ve y unclea ) o 5 (Ex emely clea and well unde s ood by all s akeholde s). P ojec cha e s, communica ion eco ds. Ac ionable Insigh : P ojec objec i es and plans a e no well-communica ed ac oss he o ganiza ion. Recommenda ion: U ilize a cen alized communica ion pla o m o dissemina e BPM p ojec upda es. Include clea communica ion plans in all BPM p ojec cha e s. Es ablish egula all-hands mee ings o discuss BPM p ojec s and in i e eedback. When sco es o p ojec communica ion and cla i y a e low, he logic emphasizes imp o ing p ojec cha e s and communica ion plans. I mo i a ion o change is high bu guidance om consul an s is low, he logic sugges s a e iew o consul an selec ion c i e ia and engagemen e ec i eness. P o essional Guidance o Ex e nal Consul an s: Engage wi h consul an s who ha e a p o en ack eco d in BPM o p o ide expe ise and an ex e nal pe spec i e. Ex e nal Consul an s' Guidance: Ra e he ex en and e ec i eness o ex e nal consul ancy use, including he ans e o knowledge and p ac ices o in e nal eams. Consul an engagemen sco e based on p ojec ou comes and eedback. ROI om con sul an -led ini ia i es e sus in e nally led. 1 (No in ol ed/no con ibu ion) o 5 (Signi ican in ol emen /con ib u ion). Consul an pe o mance e alua ions, p ojec ou come analyses. People Who A e Willing and Mo i a ed o Change: Selec p ojec eam membe s who a e open o change and ha e demons a ed adap abili y; in ol e hem in decision-making o keep hem mo i a ed. Change Willingness: Measu e he o ganiza ion's eadiness o change speci ic o BPM p ojec s, including s a engagemen and pa icipa ion. P e and pos - aining assessmen sco es on BPM eadiness. Employee u no e a es in depa men s unde going BPM p ojec s. 1 (High esis ance) o 5 (Eage willingness and mo i a ion o change). Engagemen su eys, pa icipa ion eco ds in BPM ini ia i es. Miscommunica ion: I no e ec i ely communica ed, BPM can be seen as a buzzwo d a he han a aluable me hodology, leading o skep icism. Insu icien Execu i e Suppo : Wi h ou s ong leade ship endo semen , BPM e o s may no be aken se iously o p io i ized. O e whelm wi h In o ma ion: An abundance o case s udies and in o ma ion can lead o con usion abou whe e o s a o un ealis ic expec a ions. Cul u al Resis ance: E en wi h awa eness, he e can be inhe en esis ance o change wi hin he o ganiza ion's cul u e ha is ha d o o e come. Misalignmen o Expec a ions: S akeholde s may ha e di e en expec a ions om BPM, leading o con lic s o disillusionmen i no managed well. Selec ion o Inco ec P ojec s: Choosing he w ong p ojec s o ini ial BPM e o s can esul in a lack o isible success and diminished c edibili y. P ojec Managemen Issues: Wi h ou s ong p o jec managemen , BPM p ojec s may ace delays, budge o e uns, o scope c eep. Inadequa e Measu emen : Poo ly de ined KPIs o a lack o measu emen ools can lead o ine ec i e moni o ing and he inabili y o demons a e alue. Desi e o Adop BPM Desc ip ion: The o ganiza ion acknowledges he need o BPM and is mo i a ed o s a adop ing BPM p ac ices. The e migh be some in o mal p ocess imp o emen s, bu no o ganized e o ye . The o ganiza ion decides o commi o BPM p ac ices and s a s o build in e nal desi e o change and p ocess imp o emen . Iden i ica ion: I he e is en husiasm abou BPM and discussions abou i s po en ial bene i s a e occu ing, bu no s uc u ed app oach has been aken, his indica es s age 2. Mo ing Fo wa d: De elop a clea ision and s a egy o BPM and s a engaging s akeholde s o suppo BPM ini ia i es. Focus: Building in e nal buy-in and p epa ing he o ganiza ion o change. Cul u e and Change Managemen : Fos e a cul u e ecep i e o change by in ol ing employees in he BPM discussion ea ly on. Add ess esis ance p oac i ely. S akeholde Engagemen : Iden i y and engage key s akeholde s o c ea e a coali ion ha desi es BPM adop ion, ensu ing hei needs and conce ns a e add essed. BPM P ojec s Desc ip ion: The o ganiza ion has ini ia ed speci ic BPM p ojec s, ocusing on imp o ing pa icula p ocesses. These a e o en pilo p ojec s ha se e as p oo o concep .Speci ic BPM p ojec s a e ini ia ed, o en as pilo s o ini ial e o s o apply BPM p inciples o pa icula business p ocesses. Iden i ica ion: I he e a e one o mo e BPM p ojec s unde way wi h dedica ed esou ces and goals, he o ganiza ion is in his s age. Mo ing Fo wa d: Analyze he ou comes o hese p ojec s o e ine he BPM app oach and p epa e o b oade implemen a ion. Focus: Gaining expe ience in BPM and demons a ing ea ly wins. Selec Pilo P ojec s: Choose ini ial BPM p ojec s ca e ully, a ge ing high-impac a eas whe e quick wins a e achie able. P ojec Managemen Bes P ac ices: U ilize s uc u ed me hodologies and obus p ojec managemen p ac ices o ensu e he success o BPM p ojec s. Moni o ing and Measu emen : Implemen KPIs o measu e he pe o mance o BPM p ojec s, using he da a o d i e decision- making and con inuous imp o emen . Awa eness and Unde s anding o BPM Desc ip ion: O ganiza ions a his s age ha e begun o ecognize he impo ance o BPM. P ocess imp o emen is ypically ad hoc, eac i e, and uns uc u ed. O ganiza ion ecognizes BPM as a po en ial alue-add and begins o unde s and i s p inciples and bene i s. Iden i ica ion: I BPM is a new concep o i he e is limi ed unde s anding o p ocess managemen p inciples o ganiza ion- wide, i 's likely a his s age. Mo ing Fo wa d: In oduce o mal BPM aining and es ablish a sense o u gency o p ocess imp o emen . Focus: Educa ion on BPM impo ance and i s impac on pe o mance. Educa ion a nd Co mmunica ion: Conduc wo kshops and aining sessions o educa e s akeholde s abou he bene i s and p inciples o BPM. Visible Execu i e Suppo : Secu e and showcase execu i e endo semen o highligh he impo ance o BPM wi hin he o ganiza ion. Case S udies and Success S o ies: Sha e case s udies o success ul BPM implemen a ions o illus a e po en ial gains and encou age buy-in. S age #1 S age #2 S age #3 30 APPENDIX C - EXPERT QUESTIONNAIRE 1. In you expe ience, wha a e he key elemen s o ocus on du ing he BPM adop ion? 2. How would you desc ibe he mos e ec i e me hods o in oduce BPM concep s o he o ganiza ion? 3. Wha ole do you see o leade ship in BPM adop ion? 4. Do you expec any challenges du ing implemen a ion o BPM? How can hey be mi iga ed? 5. Wha a e he mos c i ical success ac o s o BPM adop ion ha you belie e should be p io i ized? 6. I you can apply a decision engine model o BPM, wha ea u es do you hink would help you he mos ? Wha o a oid and how o s uc u e be e ? 7. How do you iew he po en ial ole o AI in BPM, especially in iden i ying and edesigning business p ocesses? 8. F om you pe spec i e, wha ypes o da a sou ces can be used o he decision engine? Would ex e nal inpu s like cus ome eedback add alue? 9. Should a BPM ool balance da a-d i en insigh s wi h human judgmen ? O be pu ely echnical? 31