scieee Science in your language
[In] (orig)

Enviromental responsability and corporate social responsability

Abstract

[EN] The environmental management of companies and organizations in general is going to be internalized in the operation and management structures, linking conceptual and chronologically to improve corporate reputation, management excellence, knowledge and innovation. Embracing, undoubtedly too, with the assumption of an ethical commitment of the company to society: environmental sustainability and generational solidarity in the transmission of culture and values of that nature. The existing need to know the potential impact of business operations on society and the environment results in the appearance of a document, which may well be called a Sustainability Report or Social Balance, which is compiled from a series social indicators, which are the instruments responsible to reflect the value of the shares held by the company in social and environmental fields.

Read accessible full text

Enviromental responsability and corporate social responsability

Author: Marí Farinós, Jesús
Publisher: Universitat Politècnica de València
Year: 2015
DOI: 10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2015.4477
Source: https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/10251/69300/1/4477-15356-2-PB.pdf
86
Sa e he wo ld!!! By Pa el Ahmed, 16/06/2010, used unde CC BY 2.0, modi ica ion:cu , sou ce: h ps://www. lick .com/pho os/
pa elahmed/4770270959/
Vi u io
In e na ional jou nal
o A chi ec u e
Technology and
Sus ainabili y
Volume 0
87
ABSTRACT
En i omen al esponsabili y and co po a e
social esponsabili y
Jesús Ma í Fa inós1
1Uni e si a Poli ècnica de València
The en i onmen al managemen o companies and o ganiza ions in gene al is going o be in e nalized
in he ope a ion and managemen s uc u es, linking concep ual and ch onologically o imp o e
co po a e epu a ion, managemen excellence, knowledge and inno a ion. Emb acing, undoub edly
oo, wi h he assump ion o an e hical commi men o he company o socie y: en i onmen al
sus ainabili y and gene a ional solida i y in he ansmission o cul u e and alues o ha na u e.
The exis ing need o know he po en ial impac o business ope a ions on socie y and he en i onmen
esul s in he appea ance o a documen , which may well be called a Sus ainabili y Repo o Social
Balance, which is compiled om a se ies social indica o s, which a e he ins umen s esponsible o
e lec he alue o he sha es held by he company in social and en i onmen al ields.
KEYWORDS
Social esponsabili y ; En i onmen al esponsabili y
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.4995/ i u io-ija s.2015.4477
88
En i onmen al esponsibili y a e Di ec i e
2004/35 / EC and he exis ing En i onmen al
Responsibili y law and he Regula ions ha
pa ially de elop i , ha e p o ided he Spanish
legal sys em o a solid suppo and majo
weapons o p e en , an icipa e and epai
ac ions ha occu , will occu o migh occu o
he en i onmen . Some hing, ha pe haps, in
o he a eas o CSR has no happened so deeply
and demanding, some imes s aying on me e
p oclama ions o p inciple. In ac , en i onmen al
esponsibili y and p o use egula ion a e bo h
a Eu opean and Spanish le el, he o igin o
oday’s mode n concep o co po a e social
esponsibili y and he subsequen egula ions
issued abou his las ma e .
In he abo e sense, hey a e o emphasize some
issues, which a e lis ed below.
Fi s , co po a e social esponsibili y (CSR) should
be unde s ood as a whole o ha monious se
whe e all he elemen s ha comp ise i mus
be also ully in e nalized by he membe s o he
company. I does no seem igh ha a company
being igo ous in he en i onmen al aspec
because, su ely, he e a e Eu opean, na ional
and egional egula ions o cing he company
o do i , howe e , ac ing wi h g ea e laxi y in
ma e s o equali y, labou , human igh s, e c.
Second, he cu en legisla ion on CSR su e s
om being oo p og amma ic, mos pa
disposi i e and a ely impe a i e, as has been
collec ed in he b ie exegesis o A icle 39 o he
Law o Sus ainable Economy as has been done in
his job. A esponsibili y, whe he social, con ac ,
o o wha e e i s na u e, mus espond o an
exis ing p io obliga ion, o ace o on behal
o socie y, s akeholde s o in e es g oups. I
canno be le o who should espond, acul y o
will o do so. The e o e, we p opose a legisla i e
change ha , e en i i is g adually inse s some
obliga ions ega ding CSR: obliga ion o
p epa e an annual epo o all lis ed companies,
obliga ion o he CNMV and he S a e Council
on CSR ; egula ing he p ocedu e o g an ing,
e iew and e oca ion seal socially esponsible
company, obliga ion o e alua e and quan i y
CSR by companies, esul ing in CSR accoun ing,
e c.
In addi ion, one mus unde s and CSR as he
esul o a new social con ac , business and
socie y, whe e his equi es ha some ex a
nego iable de i a i es beha iou s, among
o he hings, ei e a ing wha Howa d R. Bowen
said, no ing ha companies we e and a e “ i al
cen e s o powe and decision-making whose
ac ions a ec he li es o ci izens in many ways.”
The e o e, hey mus espond, in a synallagma ic
way. CSR mus inc easingly be con igu ed as a se
o obliga ions- esponsibili ies in socie y, social
in e es g oups ha aim o imp o e he quali y
o li e in gene al and en i onmen in pa icula .
I is impo an also o no e ha wi hin CSR,
en i onmen al esponsibili y, as bo h concep ual,
p ac ical applica ion and nominal le el i is pa
o he o ganiza ional cul u e, bo h p i a e and
public, companies and ins i u ions: hus people.
In addi ion, i is in eg a ed ac oss he b oade
business o co po a e social esponsibili y, bu
unlike his as a whole, i s implemen a ion and
equi emen is mo e s ingen , p edic ably o
being con ined wi hin manda o y ules and
because socie y as a whole has a mo e clea
conscience, igo ous and demanding in e ms o
companies’ compliance.
Finally, en i onmen al esponsibili y has been
de eloped o p o ide a solid and se led legal
sys em in e io ized could be said in his case
hanks o a se ies o “ i ues” o Eu opean, na ional
and egional ules e e ed o in his pape , which
has ul illed hype egula ion, some imes wi h
he c i e ia and equi emen s o legal ce ain y,
impe a i eness and accomplishing objec i es o
Vi u io
In e na ional jou nal
o A chi ec u e
Technology and
Sus ainabili y
Volume 0
89
gene al in e es pu sued, he eby o se ing he
hipo egula ion o CSR as a whole.
These “ i ues” can be summa ized in he
ollowing i ems:
sȩ 4HEȩ INTRODUCTIONȩ OFȩ OBJECTIVEȩ RESPONSIBILITYȩ
along subjec i e in de e mining, impu a ion,
p e en ing and epai o en i onmen al damage,
and, he e o e, conside a ion o en i onmen al
damage as a disease ha needs no explici legal
ep oach in he sense o equi emen o in en o
negligence. Jus he concu ence o he ha m ul
ac and he causali y ela ion linking i o an ac
o omission o a pe son, na u al o ju idical, o
deploy all esponsibili y pu poses.
sȩ 4HEȩ DECOUPLINGȩ ORȩ RATHERȩ COMPLEMENTARITYȩ
o en i onmen al esponsibili y wi h he ci il
ex a con ac esponsibili y, gi ing alue o he
en i onmen pe se, se ing i as legally p o ec ed.
Insis ha , ega dless o o he p o ec ed igh s,
as may be he p ope y, li e o physical in eg i y
o he people a ec ed by he damage.
Howe e , o he i s ime, en i onmen al
damage equi es epai , p e en ion o es i u ion
me ely because o he damage and ha he e
has been an en i onmen al legal igh . I is wha
we migh call he subjec i i y o cus omizing
he en i onmen . Tha is, na u e, en i onmen
acqui e na u aliza ion as a legal pe soni ica ion,
a leas as a subjec suscep ible o be damaged,
which acqui es i s own igh o be compensa ed.
This is one o he mos signi ican ad ances: he
en i onmen as a subjec o igh s, such as alue
Figu e 1.
90
and legally p o ec ed. Besides, addi ionally, o
o damage caused o pe sons o p ope ies o
hese emains.
The abo e duali y se s an ad anced
en i onmen al law and he adminis a ion,
public au ho i ies mus play an impo an ole, as
con igu ed as ep esen a i es, gua dianship o
p o ec o a e o he en i onmen .
Along wi h hose public au ho i ies, ci izens,
in e es g oups, a e also en i onmen al
olun ee ing and a e se up as public au ho i ies,
bu also o he companies, in o de o p e en o ,
i necessa y, epai , an icipa e and a oid o he
u u e, po en ial damage o he en i onmen as a
subjec o igh s.
Ano he i uous elemen o he new
en i onmen al law is ha i is no only in a
pallia i e le el bu also in he p e en i e one.
No only he pos damnum egula ing ac ions,
bu is in ended o an icipa e and p e en such
damage can e en happen.
The du ies o in o ma ion and pe iodic
epo ing, he obliga ion o ake p e en i e
measu es by companies and o ganiza ions and,
undamen ally, he obliga ion o ha e a inancial
gua an ee (ma e ialized in insu ance policy, bank
gua an ee o cons i u ion o echnical ese es
by a und o his pu pose) wi h a co e age o
20 million eu os, is one o he majo ad ances
o he new en i onmen al egula ions, which also
is a logical co olla y o objec i e esponsibili y
ins i u ed.
In conclusion, we no e and ei e a e ha CSR is a
whole and mus be ea ed holis ically, plus hey
mus also pa ially deploy hei pa icula analysis
and e ec s.
CSR and ins umen s o make i e ec i e
by companies a e pa o he neo-capi alis
co po a e cul u e, o a leas , should be pa ,
because i is one o he bes s ocks o ad ance
sus ained and solida i y and ensu ing business
and peace ul p ocesses inside and ou side he
company.
CSR come oge he and pa icipa e in o he
business elemen s linked o he concep s o
he new business managemen (NBM), such as
knowledge managemen , quali y managemen ,
managemen o ideas and inno a ion. The
in angible capi al, he Economy, o he socie y
knowledge, a e he ones which can help and
con ibu e o he p og ess al eady made in
companies and o ganiza ions, he de elopmen
and excellence o i s esou ces and o hemsel es,
and e iciency.
And knowledge, excellence, e iciency, oday
no e e eally canno be di o ced om he
esponsibili y, indi idually, co po a e (g oup) o
social, because ha dly can someone be quali y
excellen , i speci ic aspec s ha a ec people
a e no aken in o accoun , e en i no om
business ela ionships abou supply o goods
o se ices. Because you canno be e icien i
he cos s a e no a oided no a e wa ned - no
esponding o he legi ima e social demands
ha also con ibu e o he imp o emen o
p ocesses, p ocedu es and p oduc s. Mo eo e ,
a he ime o se ious c isis in which we li e, o
we s and by hese di e en ial aspec s o we can
ha dly su i e, su i e and h i e.
Because knowledge ul ima ely is e e ywhe e,
and like Bal asa G acian s a ed ha he e was no
one who I could no lea n om o anyone who I
could no each some hing, ad anced company
knows ha e e y hing and e e yone has o lea n,
a leas lis en, and always espond when asked
o is equi ed o. Tha is anspa ency, and only
hose who ha e some hing o hide becomes
opaque.
CSR helps o be anspa en , i helps o be i m,
o be a co po a ion. Up o now, he eali y seems
o ge us close o a s a e o anslucency-and
p ecisely he c isis has no come o help, bu

Vi u io
In e na ional jou nal
o A chi ec u e
Technology and
Sus ainabili y
Volume 0
91
should be aken as an ad an age o p omo e
hese aspec s-p ecisely. I he e o e seems
necessa y ha public au ho i ies should
encou age wi h impe a i e de e mined cha ac e
o go om anslucency o anspa ency wi h he
impe a i e legisla ion, a ionalizing ha leads us
o he in e naliza ion, which make he imposi ion
o cul u e change, cul u e esponsibili y.
Because only i we a e esponsible we can be
mo e demanding a leas e hically, ha ing mo e
a gumen s o be demanding. In addi ion, wi h i ,
we will gene a e con idence, con idence ha in
many a eas, we a e missing and needing and is
always in he basis o social ac ion.
In ac , he his o y o humani y, in a mode n
and uni e sal sense, is de ined as he s o y o
cul u al ela ions and scien i ic and echnological
p og ess o human beings and hei socie ies
om i s o igin o he p esen 1, in sho : Cul u e
and science, o he name ha can encompass
bo h: knowledge, and hence he o Knowledge
Socie y2. Wha ad ances and p og ess he human
being, in posi i e sense, is p ecisely he inc ease
in knowledge, as such, i is s e ile and he e o e
hei e ec s un old posi i e and nega i e
consequences on hose human ela ionships
and sel -e olu ion. The e o e, he e hical aspec
ponde s hose ad ances in knowledge in wo
ways: elimina ing he ha m ul aspec s o he
man i sel (p inciple o digni y); and ensu ing
ha he bene i s he eo each all (p inciple o
dis ibu i e equali y).
Such is he impo ance and signi icance o
his business aspec and pe haps i s his o ical
con ibu ion o he u u e o humani y om he
e hical and p oduc i e pe spec i e.
A b ie ou line o his inca dina ion o co po a e
social esponsibili y would be as desc ibed in
he ig. 1.
NOTES
1. In his ega d, UNESCO has emphasized his cul u al and scien-
i ic- echnical side, as he key o unde s anding and peace ul e olu-
ion be ween people and humans and ha monious unde s anding
o he his o y o mankind. A con ibu ion o his was he comple ion
in 2009 o he publica ion o he 51 olumes o he collec ion o Ge-
ne al and Regional His o ies UNESCO, ho ough wo k ha has la-
s ed o abou 57 yea s and has enjoyed he pa icipa ion o mo e
han 1,800 his o ians and expe s in he wo ld. The six collec ions o
UNESCO a e: His o y o Humani y, Gene al His o y o A ica, Gene al
His o y o La in Ame ica, Gene al His o y o he Ca ibbean, His o y
o Ci iliza ions o Cen al Asia and Di e en Aspec s o Islamic Cul-
u e. You see: h p://po al.unesco.o g/geog aphy/es/e .php-URL_
ID=11754&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.h ml.
2. Wha migh be called he “ iple C: Cul u e + Science = know-
ledge”. The e m Knowledge Socie y o Knowledge Socie y e e s o
he ex ensi e and in ensi e use o ICT, al hough hese a e con igu-
ed as ins umen al o media e elemen o he essen ially impo an :
he abili y and he possibili y o inc easing ha knowledge like ne e
be o e ook A e all, hanks o ICTs, and make i a ailable o socie y
as well as e e could be.