Ku gans o he Eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s.
P elimina y epo on an a chaeological su ace su ey
in he 2022 season
Jakub Ha lík– Vendula Dědko á– Kah amon Toshaliye
ABSTRACT
The eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s, sou he n Uzbekis an, ha e ecen ly shown o be apa icula ly ich egion
in e ms o a chaeology. Among awide ange o a chaeological si es sp eading ch onologically om he
Neoli hic o P e -Mode n pe iod, ku gan mounds u ned ou o be apa icula ly equen ea u e cha ac-
e is ic o he a eas su ounding he na ow i e alleys. This epo p esen s new da a on he occu ence
o ku gan mounds ga he ed by he Czech -Uzbekis ani a chaeological mission in he sp ing season 2022.
By means o a a ge ed ex ensi e su ace su ey, he Czech -Uzbekis ani eam ocused on ou p incipal
a eas: 1) no h o he illage o Ka abag, 2) eas o he illage o Khojaulkan, 3) he alley o Alamlisay,
and 4) he a ea be ween he illages o Kha ak and Panjob. The su ey yielded in o al 188 ku gan mounds,
no coun ing hund eds o o he a ious a chaeological ea u es iden i ied. The o al numbe o ku gans
eco ded so a in he eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s exceeds ou hund ed, indica ing an in ensi e pas
exploi a ion o he highland a eas o he nowadays Su khanda ya p o ince. This epo ocusses on he
mo phology and spa ial dis ibu ion o newly de ec ed ku gan mounds and a emp s o pu hem in he
con ex o p e ious esea ch.
KEYWORDS
Cen al Asia; No he n Bac ia; ku gans; cai ns; landscape a chaeology.
INTRODUCTION
Since 2014 he Czech -Uzbekis ani a chaeological mission has in a ious ways sys ema ically
ocused on mapping and in es iga ing he pas cul u al landscape o he eas e n oo hills o he
Kugi ang moun ain ange (Su khanda ya p o ince, sou he n Uzbekis an). The p ima y impe-
us o he ini ia ion o long - e m ac i i ies in his a ea had been he disco e y o wo, so a
un eco ded, ku gan ields nea he illages o Ka abag and Kay i , espec i ely (S ančoe al.
2014, 31–32). Al hough he main in e es quickly mo ed owa d he in es iga ion o se lemen
si es da ed om he La e B onze Age o he Ea ly I on Age (S ančoe al. 2016; Kysela– Au-
gus ino á– Kinas on 2018), An iqui y (S ančoe al. 2020; S ančo 2021), and Middle Ages
(Damašeke al. 2020), he s udy o ku gan mounds emained cons an among he objec i es
o he expedi ion, ei he as apa o he gene al su ace su ey ac i i ies (S ančoe al. 2018),
o as asole ocus o aspecialised sub -p ojec conduc ed be ween 2017 and 2018 (Ha lík–
S ančo– Ha líko á 2017; Ha lík– Ha líko á– S ančo 2018; Ha líke al. 2018). Up o 2018
hese e o s had esul ed in mo e han i e hund ed s one and/o ea hen -made s uc u es
being eco ded. Mo e han wo hund ed o hem ha e been classi ied as ku gan mounds.
In he sp ing o 2022, asmall eam o he Czech -Uzbekis ani mission ocused on su eying
he a eas o he eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s, which had no been in es iga ed in de ail o
a ious easons in he cou se o p eceding p ojec s. Going om he wes o he eas , hese
STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1, 203–236
204 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
a eas (Fig. 1) comp ise: 1) he a ea o he no h o Ka abag illage in he di ec ion o Za au say
and Kyzyl Alma illage, 2) he a ea o he eas o Ka abag, be ween he illage i sel and he
illage o Khojaulkan, 3) he alley o Alamlisay and i s su oundings, and 4) he a ea be ween
he illages o Kha ak and Panjob. Based on he s udy o sa elli e image y and he ield su ey,
he objec i e o he ield season was o comple e image o he dis ibu ion o ku gan mounds
in he eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s, as well as o assess he a chaeological po en ial o hese
a eas. Al hough he in es iga ion o ku gan mounds concen a es on asingle landscape ea u e
ca ego y, in conjunc ion wi h o he ield p ojec s, i a emp s o con ibu e o he long - e m
goal o he Czech -Uzbekis ani a chaeological mission, i.e., abe e unde s anding o he pas
cul u al landscape o he oo hill s eppe zone as awhole. This epo ou lines he p elimina y
esul s o he 2022 sp ing season and, ha ing no in en ion o p oposing i s de ailed analysis a
his poin , in oduces he lis o eco ded ku gan mounds accompanied by ield obse a ions
on hei dis ibu ion and mo phological cha ac e is ics.
Following he local e minological p ac ice, he e m ku gan is h oughou his ex used
o a egula , ci cula - o o al -shaped mound (cai n, umulus) o appa en an h opogenic
o igin made o s one o ea h, ega dless o i s ac ual pu pose (sepulch al, i ual, e c.).
Fig. 1: No he n pa o he eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s. Dis ibu ion o ku gans. Ku gans eco ‑
ded in 2022 a e ma ked whi e. Map by J. Ha lík. Basemap: Es i.
205JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
RESEARCH AREA AND BACKGROUND
The Kugi ang moun ain ange wi h i s highes peak a Ai i Baba (3139 m.a.s.l.) is loca ed on he
bo de lands o wo Cen al Asian epublics, Uzbekis an and Tu kmenis an. I s well -de ined
idge op o ms aconside able pa o hei sou he nmos bo de line. The eas e n oo hills o
Kugi ang sp ead ou owa ds he Su khanda ya dep ession in he e i o y o he Uzbekis ani
p o ince o he same name, occupying aconside able pa o he She abad and Baysun dis ic s.
A an al i ude o ca. 1200 m.a.s.l., he sha p idges a e al e na ed wi h he d y olling s eppe.
The dis inc i ely hilly s eppe en i onmen is in e spe sed wi h i e alleys o med by he
igh bank ibu a ies o She abad Da ya and Amu Da ya and adjacen la i e e aces and
ele a ed pla eaux. E en hough hey a e no he only passable a eas in he piedmon s, he
p edominan ly no hwes o sou heas o ien a ed i e alleys ep esen impo an na u al
co ido s used equen ly by mode n a ic, aking ad an age o conc e e oads. The local
clima e is semi -a id con inen al, cha ac e ised by d as ic empe a u e a ia ions be ween
bo h day and nigh and summe and win e . While illage mic ooases wa e ed om nume -
ous sp ings o e he oppo uni y o localised ho icul u e and small -scale ag icul u e, he
as s eppe a eas beyond he illages a e o mos o he yea exploi ed o g azing, and only
occasionally allow ain - ed ag icul u e in sui able loca ions.
E en hough he piedmon zone o e s a chaeologis s amuch be e p ese ed landscape
han he lowland a eas ans o med beyond ecogni ion by he So ie -pe iod collec i isa-
ion (S ide 2004, 132–133; S ančo 2019a, 14–15; S ančo 2019b, 380–383; Ha líke al. 2022;
c ., Man ellini– Be dimu ado 2019), he deg ee o mode n human impac on he olde
cul u al landscape causes signi ican limi a ions o su ace su ey. The wa e way ne wo k
and gene al e ain elie a e no a ec ed he e by mode n ag icul u e, as in he case o low-
lands, ne e heless, ploughing o la pla eaux and i e e aces caused signi ican losses
in mic o opog aphy, a ec ing many ea u es o he cul u al landscape, especially hose o
smalle size, ku gan mounds among hem. Foo hill d y a ming has along adi ion in Su -
khanda ya p o ince (Mae 1879a, 304–305; Mae 1879b, 92–94), eaching i s highes scale
p obably igh be o e he ini ia ion o la ge -scale lowland i iga ion p ojec s in he 1960s. I
he mois u e condi ions allow, ele a ed ields a e also being sown oday. In addi ion o he
damage caused by ploughing, he p ese a ion o a ious s one s uc u es in he oo hill
a ea su e s om he s one collec ion o building pu poses, usually wi hou any in e es
o locals in obbing he indings hidden po en ially benea h he s uc u e. Cai ns and s one
se ings loca ed nea dwellings and oads a e na u ally mos exposed o his h ea , howe e ,
wi h popula ion g ow h, he s one collec ion ac i i y a ec s an inc easingly la ge a ea mo e
in ensi ely. Du ing he las en yea s, he eam membe s o he Czech -Uzbekis ani mission
no iced a apid deg ee o disappea ance o s one -made a chaeological ea u es, ap essing
impe us o in ensi y an a emp o map and documen as la ge numbe o endange ed objec s
as possible be o e i is oo la e.
Because he impo ance o his a ea has been ecognised ela i ely ecen ly, he a chaeo-
logical mapping o he eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s canno p o i ex ensi ely om p e ious
esea ch. Be o e launching se e al in e na ional esea ch p ojec s in he 2000s, he oo hill
alleys we e subjec o only cu so y econnaissance su eys o small -scale exca a ions
(R eladze 1974; Bobokhojae – Annae – Rakhmano 1990) ha had shown no g ea
in e es in mino a chaeological ea u es such as ku gans, which emained unno iced (o
unpublished) excep o J. Duke’sb ie men ion o his exca a ions o ku gan ield o Loyal-
agan (Duke 1975). I is no wi hou in e es ha , in con as o neighbou ing egions, whe e
a equen occu ence o a ious ku gan bu ial g ounds has been eco ded al eady du ing
206 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
he second hal o he 20 h cen u y (Mendelsh am 1975; Li inskiy– Sedo 1984, 104–120),
he e idence o he occu ence o his peculia bu ial o m commonly associa ed wi h mobile
pas o alis s o he Eu asian s eppe zone, is su p isingly sca ce in he a ea o he nowadays
Su khanda ya p o ince as awhole (Li inskiy– Sedo 1984; Pugachenko a– R eladze
1990, 44; S e chko 2007, 9–15). Consequen ly, he mo i a ion o he Czech -Uzbekis ani
a chaeological mission had become o shed mo e ligh on his phenomenon, especially in e-
la ion o aspa ial co espondence be ween he ku gan concen a ions disco e ed a he ini ial
s age o he in es iga ion and an excep ionally well p ese ed clus e o si es a ibu ed o he
Yaz Icul u e (c ., Ha lík– S ančo– Ha líko á 2017; Ha lík– Ha líko á– S ančo 2018;
Ha líke al. 2018). In some cases, he exca a ion o mounds con i med ha hey a e coe al
wi h Yaz Icul u e se lemen , in he p e ailing numbe o mounds he ch onological clues
a e a he unclea . Su p isingly, he exca a ion has no p o ed he ela ionship be ween he
ku gans o he Kugi ang piedmon s wi h (a leas p ima y) sepulch al unc ion (Ha líke al.
2018; Ha lík– Ha líko á– S ančo 2018, 156–157), lea ing an a ea o u u e esea ch.
OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY
Following up on he sub -p ojec ‘Ku gans o he Eas e n Kugi ang Piedmon s’ ha ook place
in 2017–2018, he esea ch design o he 2022 in es iga ion closely e lec ed i s objec i es and
me hodology (c ., Ha lík– S ančo– Ha líko á 2017; Ha lík– Ha líko á– S ančo 2018).
To assess he cha ac e is ics o hei occu ence and po en ial ela ion o he su ounding
physical and cul u al landscape, mapping ku gan mounds by means o ex ensi e su ace
su ey became he main ocus o he 2022 season. Amajo di e ence om p e ious su ey
seasons was he employmen o his o ical HEXAGON sa elli e image y o iden i y loca ions
o asubsequen ield su ey. While combina ion o he CORONA and mode n eely a aila-
ble image y (Google Ea h, Es i) used by he Czech -Uzbekis ani mission be o e 2022 has no
p o ed o be pa icula ly sui able o iden i ica ion o a he small ea u es like ku gans in
he ugged piedmon s eppe landscape, he high esolu ion HEXAGON image y (c ., Hamme –
Fi zpa ick– U 2022 o i s employmen in a chaeology) depic ing he esea ch a ea in he
ea ly 1970s has shown i sel o be well u ilisable o his pu pose, e ealing aconside able
numbe o so a un eco ded po en ial ku gan mounds and o he e ain anomalies. Howe e ,
ce ain bias mus be expec ed in a ou o iden i ica ion o ku gan mounds in his o ically
ploughed a eas, whe e ku gans and o he p o uding anomalies a e highligh ed by plough
ma ks a oiding he pa icula ea u e, and hus o ming acha ac e is ic len icula shape well
isible on he sa elli e image y (c ., Fig. 10). O he ac o s limi ing he ex en o he su eyed
a ea we e he bo de s o he Uzbekis ani side o Kugi ang na u e ese e and he p esence
o gua d dogs p o ec ing sheep olds, and also e y e ec i ely elimina ing he passabili y in
hei su oundings.
The ield su ey was conduc ed a p e -selec ed loca ions co e ing bo h a eas eme ging
om emo e sensing as p omising in e ms o he occu ence o e ain anomalies and hose
a eas which did no yield such da a, howe e , ha e no been su eyed in de ail by he Czech-
-Uzbekis ani eam ye . Gi en he cha ac e o he piedmon a ea and i s expanse, he su ey
ope a ed in an ex ensi e way, ocusing on e i ica ion in he ield o he p e iously iden i ied
ea u es in combina ion wi h econnaissance -o ien a ed ield walking. E en hough no de-
sc ibed in de ail in his epo , he o he a chaeological ea u es (s one se ings, ield e aces,
abandoned co als, collapsed walls, ences, wa e channels, e c.) and a e ac sca e s we e
eco ded as well o be e -examined and published sepa a ely. The iden i ied ku gan clus e s
207JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
we e su eyed in de ail in o de o map hem op imally o hei ull ex en and o collec any
su ace ma e ial ha could gi e abe e idea o he da ing o pas human ac i i ies a apa -
icula loca ion. The collec ion was conduc ed in anon -sys ema ic way o ake ap elimina y
g ab sample as small as possible. Indi idual mounds we e spa ially eco ded using ahandheld
GPS de ice, measu ed, and desc ibed in e ms o size, cons uc ion, s a e o p ese a ion,
o ien a ion, and posi ion wi hin he clus e and su ounding e ain. A en ion was egula ly
paid o he way o he ku gan clus e ing, possible s uc u al and spa ial pa e ns o he s udied
ku gans, and o he ela ions be ween he ku gans and a ious o he ea u es in he landscape,
bo h na u al (i.e., ca dinal di ec ions, e ain ea u es, i e beds, e c.) and an h opogenic (i.e.,
se lemen s, i iga ion, pe oglyphs, e c.) including hei isual (in e )connec i i y.
SURFACE SURVEY
AREA KARABAG ‑NORTH
As he name gi en o his clus e sugges s, he Ka abag -No h ku gan ield is loca ed no h
o he illage o Ka abag, which is commonly conside ed apa o he Pashkhu alley. This
concen a ion was disco e ed in 2011 by L. S ančo and Sh. Shaydullae (S ančoe al. 2014, 31),
and subsequen ly esu eyed in 2017 (Ha lík– S ančo– Ha líko á 2017, 174–179). Howe e ,
pa ly due o he bo de egime a ha ime, his a ea was no walked in i s en i e y in he
no he n di ec ion, owa ds he illage o Kyzylalma. The iden i ied ku gans a e si ua ed on
he igh bank o he Kyzylalma i e , on ele a ed e aces abo e he s eam. The e aces
show clea signs o mechanised ag icul u e. Isola ed s ips o land ha e appa en ly been
ploughed ecen ly. Fo p ac ical easons, he ku gan clus e Ka abag -No h has al eady been
di ided in o wo sub -clus e s ollowing he spa ial g ouping in 2017. The o al o 21 ea u es
was known un il 2017 while 16 mo e we e eco ded in 2022 (see Tab.1). The newly de ec ed
ku gans la gely i o he p e ailing cha ac e is ics o he p e iously iden i ied ea u es in
e ms o bo h dis ibu ion and mo phology: Excep o se e al mo e igh ly clus e ed lines
consis ing o h ee o i e mounds, he ku gans a e a he spa sely dis ibu ed o e he e -
aces ollowing oughly he o ien a ion o he Kyzylalma i e and i s nameless ibu a y.
Gi en he la e ain, ahigh deg ee o in e isibili y wi hin he clus e may be obse ed,
excep o he no he nmos iden i ied sub -clus e KAN_03 (Fig. 2, inse le ). Being asingle
line o six mounds o a ious sizes, sub -clus e KAN_03 is loca ed on he lowe i e e ace
su ounded by slopes on mos sides. All he newly de ec ed mounds a e o simple, a he low,
p edominan ly s one cons uc ion (see Fig. 3). Wi h only se e al excep ions (o igina ing
in ploughing damage?) all he ea u es a e o ci cula shape. No a ached ea u es o s one
se ings we e eco ded.
To he no h o KAN_03, acai n ield was iden i ied consis ing o mo e han adozen small-
-sized (d. up o 1.5 m) s one concen a ions. Gi en he lichen coa ing and soil co e be ween
indi idual s ones, hese ea u es do no seem o be o mode n da e, and a he hey a e ela -
ed o small -sized sys em o wa e channels and ield(?) e aces, e lec ing highly p obably
p emode n ag icul u al ac i i ies o unce ain da e. The a ea o sub -clus e KAN_01 yielded
asmall assemblage o su ace ce amic ma e ial: wo po e y sca e s o limi ed ex en (c .,
Fig.2) ga e a he uncon incing e idence in e ms o ch onology poin ing o (High?) Me
-
die al pe iod. Asingle she d o blue glazed pla e da ed om he High (p e -Mongol) Middle
Ages ound in he icini y o ku gan KAN_01_024 co esponds o he assemblage collec ed
a he no -name epa si e (c ., S ančoe al. 2014, 31; Ha lík– S ančo– Ha líko á 2017, 177),

208 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
Fig. 2: Ku gan dis ibu ion wi hin he Ka abag ‑No h a ea. Inse igh : no name epa mound. Map
by J. Ha lík. Basemap: Es i.
209JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
i sel aligned wi h ku gan mounds. The associa ion o he su ace ce amic ma e ial wi h he
ku gans may no be conside ed ce ain, a he i e lec s ac i i ies coe al o he supposed me-
die al se lemen . The inspec ion o he nameless epa (Fig. 2, inse igh ) con i med p e ious
da ing o i s occupa ion (whi e, whi e and black, and whi e and g een glazed po e y she ds
a e abundan in he su ace ma e ial), and e ealed ha he eas e n ex ension o he epa, o
akind o pla o m appa en on he sa elli e image y, is co e ed by o al -shaped s one enclo-
su es. Judging om hei size and o ien a ion hese ea u es may be p elimina ily in e p e ed
as an Islamic ceme e y, likely ch onologically co esponding wi h he occupa ion o he epa.
AREA KHOJAULKAN
The a ea o he wes o Khojaulkan (i.e., o he sou h -eas o Ka abag -No h clus e ), is cha -
ac e ised by asmall numbe o iden i ied ea u es dis ibu ed wi hou apa icula spa ial
pa e n o e a ela i ely la ge a ea. All mounds a e loca ed on he no he n edge o he ele-
a ed pla eau, which is i sel si ua ed abo e in e mi en s eams ha un down h ough he
alley in he di ec ion o he Khojaulkan illage. This discon inuous concen a ion consis s
o en mounds in o al. Th ee o hem– Khj_001, 002, and 004– di e signi ican ly om he
es , being, howe e , almos iden ical o mounds al eady eco ded in he alley o Loylagan
(Ha lík– Ha líko á– S ančo 2018, 160–161). These h ee ea hen mounds a e con ex
and almos pe ec ly ci cula in plan ( hei d. ange om 5 o 6.3 m, h. 0.5 m) and delimi ed
a ound he pe ime e by ashallow di ch (w. 0.2 m; dep h 5–10 cm). The es o he ku gans
signi ican ly ecall hose o he Ka abag clus e (ci cula shape, made o a he small s ones,
diame e anges be ween 4.5 and 13(?) m); howe e , he s a e o p ese a ion is much wo se
he e. Khojaulkan ku gans a e equen ly damaged by ploughing, and ecen ac i i ies a e also
e idenced by s ones piled up on he op o he mounds, mos likely o make way o ac o s
Fig. 3: Ku gan KAN_01_018, iew om he sou h. Pho o by V. Dědko á.
210 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
Tab.1: Ku gans o he Ka abag ‑No h a ea. Only ku gans eco ded in 2022 a e included.
Code Longi ude La i ude Wid h
N‑S (m)
Leng h
E‑W (m)
Heigh
(m)
Max. s ones
diame e (m) No e
KAN_01_014 66.78563100 37.81904500 4.5 5.2 0.25 0.1
badly de ined edges;
ci cula shape; mos ly
ea hen-made, s ones only
a ely on he su ace
KAN_01_015 66.78546800 37.81930900 5.3 5.3 0.25 0.15 
KAN_01_016 66.78487900 37.81981900 5.4 1.2 0.2 0.35 dis up ed on sides
KAN_01_017 66.77716156 37.82157480 4.5 60.4 0.3
some s ones piled up
ecen ly on he op o he
olde s uc u e.
KAN_01_018 66.77700855 37.82162532 5.5 60.2 0.4 a low mound; la ge gaps
be ween s ones
KAN_01_019 66.77713000 37.82161267 10 9 0.1 0.3
a e y low mound;
dep ession in he cen al
pa
KAN_01_020 66.77687000 37.82168600 1.2 1.2 0.2 0.3
a small ci cula -shaped
mound; compac and low;
made mos ly o small s ones
KAN_01_021 66.77424800 37.82251300 7 7 0.3 0.2 
KAN_01_022 66.77350249 37.82331140 4.5 50.3 0.3 some s ones excep ionally
la ge (d. up o 0.5 m)
KAN_01_023 66.76655900 37.82555200 3 3 0.2 0.4 a small mound made o
la ge s ones
KAN_01_024 66.75855017 37.83147517 6 8.5 0.5 0.15
ela i ely la ge mound
made o small s ones and
ea h; se e al la ge s ones
(d. a ound 0.5 m); a High
Medie al she d disco e ed
in he icini y
KAN_03_001 66.74648300 37.83540300 6.45 6 0.4 0.3 
KAN_03_002 66.74620000 37.83587200 10.5 11.1 0.5 0.3 
KAN_03_003 66.74603000 37.83609700 2 2 0.2 0.3
a small ci cula -shaped
ku gan; one la ge s one
(0.45×0.45 m) on E side
KAN_03_004 66.74602400 37.83628800 2.5 20.2 0.2 a small i egula -shaped
ku gan
KAN_03_005 66.74586733 37.83635633 2 2 0.2 0.3 a small i egula -shaped
ku gan
KAN_03_006 66.74580667 37.83643383 7 9 0.45 0.25
one la ge s one (0.5×0.5 m)
loca ed in he cen al pa o
he ku gan
211JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
Fig. 4: Ku gan dis ibu ion wi hin he Khojaulkan a ea. Map by J. Ha lík. Basemap: Es i.
Fig. 5: Ku gan Khj_003, iew om he eas . Pho o by J. Ha lík.
218 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
Fig. 10: Cen al pa o he Kha ak ‑Panjob a ea as cap u ed by KH‑9 HEXAGON (1978/03/25). Black
a ows indica e e ain anomalies iden i ied as ku gan mounds du ing he ield e i ica ion.
G aph 1: Ku gan diame e equency o he Kha ak ‑Panjob clus e . The diame e co esponds o
he a e age alue o wo (N–Sand E–W) measu ed alues.

219JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
So ie mili a y maps as Kalakoydy uins1 was also inspec ed ( epo in p epa a ion). Being
c ossed by he di oad leading up o he saddle, his si e is loca ed on he sou he n bank o
he Gazak, jus nea he go ge mou h. This a ea (ca. 200 × 200 m) is ma ked by well - isible
emains o hick s one walls o ming la ge ec angula s uc u es. Collec ed su ace ma e ial
indica es High Medie al (monoch ome whi e- o g een -glazed pla es) and P e -Mode n ( hick
she ds wi h plas ic ishne deco a ion and linea combed incisions) occupa ion o his loca ion.
Su eying his a ea in 2018, A. Augus ino á collec ed ce amic assemblage da ed p elimina ily
o he Ea ly Middle Ages (5 h–6 h c. AD). Amino i y o su ace she ds was a ibu ed o he
Achaemenid pe iod, howe e , e idence o his da ing has been conside ed a he uncon inc-
ing (A. Augus ino á, pe sonal communica ion, July 17, 2023).
Being he mos nume ous concen a ion o ku gans iden i ied in he eas e n Kugi ang
piedmon s so a , he Kha ak -Panjob clus e consis s o 146 ku gans. In con as o he clus e s
men ioned abo e, ku gan mounds o he Kha ak -Panjob a e o amuch mo e he e ogeneous
na u e in e ms o he dis ibu ion o mounds in he landscape, as well as hei size and mo -
phology. E en hough ace ain endency owa ds linea dis ibu ion may be obse ed, i seems
ha he e is no de e mina i e o ien a ion among he ku gans o his g oup, and i is ha d o
ind any (uni o m) dis ibu ional pa e n. The e a e se e al lines consis ing o h ee o ou
ku gans o oughly NW–SE o ien a ion, ne e heless, in he eas e n pa o he clus e , he
SW–NE o ien a ion p e ails. In his pa o he clus e , he ku gan dis ibu ion co esponds
o he cou se o he di oad depic ed on he So ie opog aphic maps om he 1980s, which
is nowadays a he ha d o ecognise in he ield. To some ex en , he Kha ak -Panjob clus e
as awhole appea s o be aligned wi h he wo di oads ha un h ough he saddle (c .,
Figs.9–10), which could hypo he ically sugges a ela ion o pas communica ions.
1 ‘разв. Калакойды’, c ., opog aphic map shee J-42-074-B; Fig. 9 below.
Fig. 11: Ku gan KhP_103, iew om he eas . A ypical medium ‑sized s one ‑made ku gan. Pho o by
V. Dědko á.
220 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
Fig. 12: Ku gan KhP_105, iew om he eas . Pho o by V. Dědko á.
Fig. 13: Ku gan KhP_130, iew om he no h ‑wes . No e ha only pa o he o iginal mound is
p ese ed. Pho o by V. Dědko á.
221JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
In e ms o mo phology, egula ly ounded conca e ku gans made p edominan ly o
s ones o a ious sizes a e he mos cha ac e is ic (see Figs. 11–13). Thei diame e s ange
om 3 o 10 m, wi h some la ge excep ions (KhP_087; 105; 145). These ku gans esemble hose
eco ded by he Czech -Uzbekis ani mission h oughou he Kugi ang piedmon s, pa icula ly
nea Kay i , Ka abag, and Loylagan (Ha lík– S ančo– Ha líko á 2017, Ha lík– Ha lík-
o á– S ančo 2018, 151–157), o nea Khojaulkan and Alamli desc ibed abo e. Co espondingly
o dis ibu ional p e e ences o he p e iously known clus e s, he e is ace ain endency
owa ds linea i y. This is he case o asub -clus e KhP_007–014; KhP_037–041, which seems
o ollow an abandoned di oad in SW–NE di ec ion, o NW–SE o ien ed KhP_143–145 si -
ua ed on asligh ly ele a ed p ominence. The same o ien a ion may be obse ed in he case
o KhP_098–106, which also consis s o smalle o badly p ese ed ku gans– mos ly due o
equen ploughing, which causes he o e all bad s a e o p ese a ion o he mounds. Nex
o he ploughing ma ks and ela ed o his ac i i y mode n ield clea ances loca ed equen ly
on he op o ku gans, s oneless dep essions in he mounds cen al pa s ep esen ano he
kind o damage, caused p obably along ime ago in an e o o obbing he ku gan mounds.
Apeculia ype o ku gans is ep esen ed by egula ly ounded mounds o la ge diame e
(19–40 m). Two ku gans o simila dimensions had been de ec ed be o e 2022 only in he alley
o Gu jak (i.e., no h o Khojaulkan), being conside ed excep ionally la ge in he measu es o
he eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s (Ha lík– Ha líko á– S ančo 2018, 169). The se en de ec ed
mounds o his ype (KhP_025; 036; 062; 083; 131; 132; 146) a e dis ibu ed o e he saddle wi h-
ou any clea pa e n wi h ela i ely la ge dis ances be ween each o he . Excep o KhP_036
which shows no signs o s one cons uc ion, he emains o well -laid s one ings a ound he
pe ime e delimi each o hem. In mos cases, he s one ing is much be e p ese ed on
he wes e n side o he mound (see Figs. 15, 17). Bo h he dimensions and cons uc ion (i.e.,
an ea hen mound wi h as one ing) o hese ku gans ecall Wusun (o Saka -Wusun) bu ial
mounds o he las cen u ies BC in sou he n Kazakhs an (c ., Akishe – Kushae 1963, 235–245;
Baipako – Taimagambe o 2006, 156–160; c ., Chang 2018, 27–29). Howe e , wi hou p ope
exca a ion, no da ing can be a ibu ed o hese ku gans a his poin . In he cases o KhP_025
and KhP_146, he e is a egula ly ci cula s one -made mound loca ed in he cen al pa o
he ea hen s uc u e. These s one ku gans on he op o he ea hen ones a e iden ical wi h
he ype common h oughou he eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s (see abo e). I canno be uled
ou ha , in he case o ku gans KhP_025 and KhP_146, we a e dealing wi h wo subsequen
cons uc ion phases, pe haps a eu iliza ion o olde mounds?
The eu iliza ion o he la ge mounds o Kha ak -Panjob is also e idenced in o he ways:
A oughly 440 m long linea s uc u e (w. ca. 1 m; h. up o 0.3 m) is a ached om he sou h-
-wes o he mound KhP_062. This s uc u e (abaulk o unce ain da e?), p obably la e han
he cons uc ion o he mound i sel , cu es o he no h -wes , owa ds he nowadays di
oad. This linea s uc u e di ides ield s ips ( he ploughing ma ks ollow he cou se o he
s uc u e om bo h sides), p esumably enhancing he po en ial o ain - ed ag icul u e by
ca ching wa e coming du ing ains down om he ocky slopes and gullies in he no h-
wes . Asimila kind o wha seems o be a eu iliza ion o ala ge ku gan mound p esen s he
KhP_025 and he a ea in i s immedia e p oximi y. The e a e wo s one lines (w. ca. 1 m, h. up
o 0.4 m) a ached o he s one ing in he no h -wes di ec ion (see Fig. 16). Going pa allel
o each o he and keeping adis ance o ca. 60 m, hese wo lines a e disce nible o almos
200 m leading owa ds he ocky moun ain slopes. A wo places a leas , he a ea de ined by
he s one lines is pe pendicula ly di ided by wha appea o be ield e aces o unce ain
da e, aking ad an age o wa e coming om he ocky slopes.
222 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
Fig. 14: Ku gans KhP_130–132 ( om le o igh ), iew om he no h ‑eas . Pho o by V. Dědko á.
Fig. 15: Ku gan KhP_025 (d. o he s one ing: 24.3–26.6 m), iew om he no h ‑wes . Pho o by V.
Dědko á.
La ge ci cula ku gans, made ei he o s one o ea h, a e in he Kha ak -Panjob saddle su -
ounded by nume ous smalle (d. less han 3 m, usually a ound 2 m) o less egula ku gan
mounds. Gi en he ac i e mode n ag icul u al use o his a ea, i is equen ly ha d o assess
o wha deg ee he obse ed mo phological cha ac e is ics e lec adi e en cons uc ion
ype, o whe he he p esen -day shape is he esul o damage by ploughing. Excep o
he isola ed ea u es o mounds occu ing wi hin aclus e o la ge mounds, he e a e wo
dis inguishable cohe en sub -clus e s o small ku gans in Kha ak -Panjob: KhP_045–057 and
KhP_064–082, consis ing o 13 and 19 indi idual mounds, espec i ely. Bo h a e loca ed on
agen le ele a ion. In he case o KhP_064–082, he c escen -shaped s ip o land shows only
mino o no signs o ploughing sugges ing adi e en pas ea men wi h his delimi ed a ea,
223JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
Fig. 16: One o he wo s one lines leading o he ku gan KhP_025 om he no h ‑wes e n di ec ion.
Pho o by V. Dědko á.

224 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
jus ens o me e s o he no h om he baulk(?) going om KhP_062 desc ibed abo e. On
he o he hand, igh he e, unc ion o hese mounds as ield clea ances may be sugges ed,
lea ing he in e p e a ion o hei o iginal pu pose a he unce ain.
In addi ion o ku gans, anumbe o o he ea u es ha e been eco ded in he Kha ak -Panjob
a ea, which can be ela ed ei he o he pas i ual o economic land use wi h a e y limi ed
chance o i s exac ch onological a ibu ion. Th ee s one ci cles we e iden i ied in he close
icini y o he ku gan mounds. Ca. 120 m om KhP_025, he e is asligh ly ele a ed, almos
egula ci cle (15 × 14 m) made o la ge s ones. Ve y simila , la ge , ci cle (d. 23.5 m) is loca ed
in he close icini y (ca. 20 m o he wes ) o KhP_132, and jus a ound 80 m o he no h -eas ,
ano he small (d. 5 m) ci cle was de ec ed. O he han he spa ial ela ion o he s one ci cles
o he la ges ca ego y o ku gan mounds canno be con i med a his poin .2 Nex o appa -
en ly mode n ield clea ances sp ead o e he ields, he slopes bo de ing he saddle plain a e
equen ly occupied wi h emains o abandoned ield e aces, enclosu es, and slope ields,
which may e lec p eindus ial, bu also signi ican ly olde , ag icul u al ac i i ies he e. Thei
equen occu ence illus a es a ela i ely in ensi e pas land use, opening space o u u e
esea ch o he midland (uppe oo hill) en i onmen ep esen ed by he Kha ak Panjob saddle.
CONCLUSIONS
By in oducing new da a on he occu ence o ku gan mounds and hus supplemen ing he
p edominan ly se lemen -o ien a ed esea ch ac i i ies, he 2022 su ace su ey season
con ibu ed signi ican ly o along - e m mapping p og amme o he eas e n Kugi ang pied-
2 Simila , hough smalle , ci cles ha e been de ec ed wi hin ku gan clus e s in Kay i (Ha lík–
S ančo– Ha líko á 2017, 165, 168) and Loylagan (Ha lík– Ha líko á– S ančo 2018, 154, 161).
Use o simila s uc u es as aplace o (commemo a i e) o e ings was no in equen among Tu -
kic peoples (c ., Okladniko a 1986, 81–88; Kuba e 2005, 16), howe e , hey ha e been iden i ied
also as g a e ma ke s: Fo Kushan pe iod in sou he n Tajikis an see Mendelsh am 1975, 64–109.
Simila ela ion could con i m also newly exca a ed Yuezhi pe iod bu ials in he alley o Loylagan
(publica ion in p epa a ion by L. S ančo) ca 12 km as he c ow lies om Kha ak -Panjob a ea.
Fig. 17: Ku gan KhP_146 (d. o he s one ing 39–40 m), iew om he no h ‑wes . Pho o by V. Dědko á.
225JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
mon s. Based on he ga he ed e idence and i s compa ison wi h he p e ious s a e o esea ch,
se e al obse a ions can be made. Al hough he piedmon a ea clea ly does no ep esen
alandscape un ouched by mode n ac i i ies, i s ill o e s a ela i ely good oppo uni y o
s udy a ious ace s (economic, i ual, se lemen ) o he land use da ed p obably om long
be o e he indus ial pe iod and complemen he a chaeological esea ch o no he n Bac ian
lowlands. The 188 ku gan mounds iden i ied in 2022 make a o al numbe o 4063 mounds e-
co ded in he eas e n Kugi ang piedmon s so a , showing hei dis ibu ion li e ally in e e y
piedmon i e alley. The newly mapped ku gans bea simila i y o hose p e iously known:
The s one -made oughly ci cula mounds o medium size (mos usually be ween 5 and 8 m in
diame e ), ha e al eady been well e idenced in he alleys o Kay i , Ka abag, Loylagan, and
elsewhe e, appea ing o be he bes de ined and well ep esen ed ype h oughou he eas e n
Kugi ang piedmon s as awhole (c ., S e chko 2007, 9–15 o simila , less egula ku gans
eco ded in he Baysun piedmon s). The loca ions a ou ed by he pas mound -builde s show
ce ain egula i ies as well, ei he in he endency owa ds he use o ele a ed pla eaux and
i e e aces, o in he p e e ence o linea clus e ing o ku gans, o en along wa e s eams
and co ido s h ough he landscape (c . Ha lík– Shaydullae in p epa a ion). While
hese common ai s indica e acohe en and con inuous pas a i ude owa ds he human
exploi a ion o his a ea, he numbe and sp ead o mounds sugges a a he long pe iod o
hei o ma ion. On he o he hand, he occu ence o excep ionally la ge and mo phologi-
cally dis inc ea hen mounds in Kha ak -Panjob, e idenced so a only a one o he loca ion
in he Kugi ang piedmon s (i.e., nea Gu jak), could sugges mo e complex dynamics o he
ku gan landscape o ma ion. The p ecise da ing and pu pose o he mounds emain unclea ,
and he su ace su ey o e s only limi ed possibili ies o abe e unde s anding o hem.
Gi en he ela i ely small sample size o he exca a ed ea u es (c ., Ha líke al. 2018), he
ela ion o sepulch al use mus s ill be se iously conside ed, and he conduc ed su ey needs
o be comple ed by exca a ions in he u u e o b ing mo e i m da a.
Howe e , he ku gan mounds and dozens o o he a chaeological ea u es eco ded du ing
asingle ex ensi e su ace su ey season ha e unde lined he unexploi ed po en ial o he a ea
and he need o mo e de ailed, sys ema ic ways o i s u u e in es iga ion. As shown by he
esul s o he su ey in he alley o Alamlisay and he saddle be ween he illages o Kha ak
and Panjob, he emo e alleys o mino wa e s eams, as well as he a eas be ween indi idual
i e alleys, dese e mo e a en ion o achie e amo e comple e and ep esen a i e co e age
o he oo hill zone and e en ually be e unde s and he socioeconomic de elopmen o his
a ea in along - e m pe spec i e.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This wo k was suppo ed by he Eu opean Regional De elopmen Fund p ojec ‘C ea i i y and
Adap abili y as Condi ions o he Success o Eu ope in an In e ela ed Wo ld’ ( eg. no.: CZ.
02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000734) and p ojec no. PRIMUS/23/HUM/013 implemen ed a he
Facul y o A s, Cha les Uni e si y.
3 No e ha F ench -Czech -Uzbekis ani exca a ion o wha appea ed o be wo sepa a ed ea u es,
Kay i 01_003 and Kay i 01_004 (c . Ha lík– S ančo– Ha líko á 2017, 169) showed ha hese
wo ea u es eco ded by asu ace su ey we e ac ually badly damaged emains o asingle s uc-
u e consis ing o aci cula mound wi h awell -de ined s one ing and apa hway lined wi h la ge
s ones o ien ed o he Eas ( epo in p epa a ion).
226 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
Tab.4: Ku gans o he Kha ak ‑Panjob a ea.
Code Longi ude La i ude Wid h
N‑S (m)
Leng h
E‑W (m)
Heigh
(m)
Max. s ones
diame e (m) No e
KhP_001 66.87398100 37.98661900 4.5 5.6 0.4 0.4
one la ge s one (d. 0.5 m);
unclea edges (maximum
ex en 6.1×6 m?), badly
de ined mound
KhP_002 66.87448661 37.98076789 1.5 1.5 0.1 0.2
o al-shaped co e, p obably
dis up ed by a ming;
s ones sca e ed a ound
KhP_003 66.87443900 37.98075400 1.6 1.6 0.2 0.2 a small, low ku gan made o
small s ones
KhP_006 66.87156317 37.98001367 1.6 1.6 0.2 0.4 a small, compac ku gan
KhP_008 66.86807083 37.97867917 6.1 7.4 0.4 0.3 unclea edges
KhP_009 66.86766050 37.97854167 4.6 4.6 0.4 0.3 a compac , medium-sized
ku gan made o la ge s ones
KhP_010 66.86693500 37.97795900 6.6 6.6 0.4 0.5
some la ge s ones; signs o
ex ension in E-W di ec ion
(d. 8.2 m?)
KhP_011 66.86652400 37.97759500 4.1 3.6 0.4 0.2
e y close o KhP_012,
c ea ing almos con inuous
o al-shaped pla o m
KhP_012 66.86652400 37.97755300 3.2 3 0.4 0.2
e y close o he KhP_011,
o ming almos con inuous
o al-shaped pla o m
KhP_013 66.86652400 37.97765900 4.1 4.8 0.4 0.3
a compac ku gan made o
la ge s ones; well- isible
ci cle o la ge s ones
delimi ing he edges
KhP_014 66.86652400 37.97730300 2.9 3.5 0.3 0.4
dis up ed on sides by
ploughing; some s ones
piled up on he op ecen ly
KhP_015 66.86652400 37.97952400 2.6 30.5 0.4 an o al-shaped ea u e
KhP_016 66.86652400 37.98700600 5.8 6.1 0.4 0.4 some la ge s ones
KhP_017 66.86652400 37.98415979 6.8 80.4 0.3 
KhP_018 66.86652400 37.98406000 6 5.3 0.7 0.5 
KhP_019 66.86652400 37.98393300 9.1 10.6 10.2 mos ly small s ones (d:
0.1–0.15)
KhP_020 66.86652400 37.98466404 17.5 9.1 0.7 0.3
a la ge o al-shaped objec ,
unclea edges – unce ain;
some la ge s ones
227JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
Code Longi ude La i ude Wid h
N‑S (m)
Leng h
E‑W (m)
Heigh
(m)
Max. s ones
diame e (m) No e
KhP_021 66.86652400 37.98207200 3 3.8 0.3 0.2 mos o he s ones seem
o be piled up ecen ly
KhP_022 66.86652400 37.98057267 2.2 3 0.2 0.1 a small, badly de ined
ea u e
KhP_023 66.86652400 37.97737500 1.9 2.1 0.2 0.3 a small cai n; unce ain,
piled up ecen ly?
KhP_024 66.86652400 37.97740900 2.7 2.3 0.3 0.15 a small cai n; unce ain,
piled up ecen ly?
KhP_025 66.86652400 37.97748700 26.6 24.3 2.5 0.3
a la ge ku gan cons is ing
o wo pa s: soil-made
mound wi h ing on he
pe ime e made o small
s ones (d. ca. 0.1 m) on S
side; a s one-made mound
(8.4×9.1 m) made o la ge
s ones (d. up o 0.3 m)
loca ed on he op; well-
p ese ed; wo lines o
s ones unning om he
ea u e in he NW di ec ion
KhP_026 66.86652400 37.97508400 3 3 0.3 0.1 dis up ed by ploughing
KhP_027 66.86652400 37.97442528 4.5 6.8 0.3 0.3
dis up ed on sides by
ploughing; ploughed ou
s ones p obably collec ed
on he op o he emaining
mound in he ecen pas ;
he e ain elie sugges s
o iginally la ge ex en o he
(ci cula ?) mound: 7 o e en
13.7 m?
KhP_028 66.86652400 37.97437000 3 1 0.2 0.2
badly p ese ed; close o
KhP_029 – o iginally
a single objec ?
KhP_029 66.86652400 37.97432500 3 1 0.2 0.2
badly p ese ed; close o
KhP_028 – o iginally
a single objec ?
KhP_030 66.86652400 37.97322700 4.5 3.8 0.2 0.4 ploughing dis up ions
KhP_031 66.86652400 37.97297300 6.8 9.9 0.4 0.2
i egula shape; pa ly
des oyed on sides by
ploughing
KhP_032 66.86652400 37.97280800 8 8 0.2 0.2 a low mound; almos no
s ones in he cen al pa
KhP_033 66.86652400 37.97302583 9.9 10.6 1.7 0.25
a la ge ku gan wi h
a s oneless dep ession in he
cen al pa ; unclea edges
(maximum dimensions:
15×14.4 m); emains o
an associa ed ea u e – an
oblong-shaped s one se ing
o a s one pla o m (d. 2.5 m)
234 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
Code Longi ude La i ude Wid h
N‑S (m)
Leng h
E‑W (m)
Heigh
(m)
Max. s ones
diame e (m) No e
KhP_132 66.86652400 37.97029368 29 31 1.3 0.25
Mino dis up ion caused by
oad coming h ough he
wes e n pa o he ku gan;
on he wes e n side, clea
signs o a s one ing/plin h
consis ing o se e al lines
o s ones.
KhP_133 66.86652400 37.97026320 10 10 0.6 0.4 a signi ican dep ession in
he cen al pa
KhP_134 66.86652400 37.97131917 4 6 0.45 0.5 dis up ed by he di oad
on he side
KhP_135 66.86652400 37.97117505 3 2 0.2 0.25 a small compac mound
KhP_136 66.86652400 37.97105092 4.5 30.5 0.4 damaged by ploughing on
bo h sides
KhP_137 66.86652400 37.97099000 3.5 20.3 0.3 damaged on sides by
ploughing
KhP_138 66.86652400 37.97192900 4 4 0.2 0.2 a low, incompac s one
mound
KhP_139 66.86652400 37.97296667 5 4 0.2 0.2 a s one line a ached o he
wes e n side
KhP_140 66.86652400 37.97315197 6 4.4 0.4 0.3 
KhP_141 66.86652400 37.97341486 5 6 0.3 0.2 
KhP_142 66.86652400 37.97352502 6 3.8 0.4 0.3 
KhP_143 66.86652400 37.97414600 8.5 7.5 0.4 0.25
some o s one a ound he
pe ime e a e excep ionally
la ge (d. 0.5–0.6 m)
KhP_144 66.86652400 37.97418600 6 7.5 0.3 0.3
some o s one a ound he
pe ime e a e excep ionally
la ge (d. 0.5–0.6 m)
KhP_145 66.86652400 37.97433500 17 17 0.5 0.2 some la ge s ones (d.
0.4–0.5 m)
KhP_146 66.86652400 37.97470050 40 39 3 0.3
mos ly ea hen-made
mound; a s one-made
ci cula ea u e (d. 8 m)
loca ed on he op in he
cen al pa ; emains o
a pe ime e s one ing
on he NW side

235JAKUB HAVLÍK– VENDULA DĚDKOVÁ– KAHRAMON TOSHALIYEV
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Akishe – Kushae 1963 = Акишев, К.А.– Кушаев, Г.А.: Древняя культура Саков иУсуней долины реки
Или. Алма -Ата.
Baipako – Taimagambe o 2008 = Байпаков К.М.– Таймагамбетов Ж.К.: Археология Казахстана.
Алматы.
Bobokhojae – Annae – Rakhmano 1990 = Бобоходжаев, А.– Аннаев, Т.– Рахманов, Ш.: Некоторые
итоги изучения дрeвних исредневековых памятников предгорной игорной полосы Кугитанг–
Байсунтау. История Материальной Кулътуры Узбекистана 23, 25–36.
Chang, C. 2018: Re hinking p ehis o ic Cen al Asia. Shephe ds, Fa me s, and Nomads. New Yo k.
Damašeke al. 2020 = Damašek, L.– Kinas on, R.– K ame , R.– Šmolko á, M.– Pilař, D.– Shaydullae , Sh.–
S ančo, L.: A chaeological exca a ions a Lungi Tepa, sou h Uzbekis an. P elimina y Repo o Season
2019. S udia He cynia 24/1, 159–178.
Duke 1975 = Дуке, Х.: Новый могильник тюркского времени вЮжном Узбекистане. In: Успехи
среднеазиатской археологии 3. Ленинград, 76.
Hamme , E.– Fi zpa ick, M.– U , J. 2022: Succeeding CORONA. Declassi ied HEXAGON in elligence
image y o a chaeological and his o ical esea ch. An iqui y 96/37, 679–695.
Ha lík, J.– Ha líko á, H.– S ančo, L. 2018: Ku gans o he Eas e n Kugi ang Piedmon s. P elimina y
Repo o Season 2018. S udia He cynia 22/2, 147–172.
Ha lík, J.– S ančo, L.– Ha líko á, H. 2017: Ku gans o he Eas e n Kugi ang Piedmon s. P elimina y
Repo o Season 2017. S udia He cynia 21/2, 160–182.
Ha líke al. 2018 = Ha lík, J.– S ančo, L.– Kysela, J.– Cejna o á, P.– Ha líko á, H.– Vo oubeko á, T.:
Ku gans o he Eas e n Kugi ang Piedmon s. P elimina y Repo on Exca a ions in Seasons 2015–2017.
S udia He cynia 22/1, 183–206.
Ha líke al. 2022 = Ha lík, J.– Bobik, J.– Dědko á, V.– Don o á, K.– K čál, J.– Ma zne o á, J.– Pa alo o,
E.– Taasob, R.– Toshaliye , K.– Ždime a, J.– Shaydullae , Sh.: Asys ema ic a chaeological su ey in he
en i ons o Khay abad Tepa (Sou he n Uzbekis an). P elimina y epo on he 2021 pilo season. S udia
He cynia 24/2, 115–140.
Kuba e 2005 = Кубарев Г.В.: Культура древних тюрок Алтая (по материалам погребальных памятников).
Новосибирск.
Kysela, J.– Augus ino á, A.– Kinas on, R.2018: P elimina y Repo s on he Exca a ions a Bu gu Ku -
ganand Bobolanga in 2017. S udia He cynia 22/1, 158–182.
Li inskiy– Sedo 1984 = Литвинский, Б.А.– Седов, А.В.: Культы иритуалы Кушанской Бактрии.
Погребальный обряд. Москва.
Mae 1879a = Маев, А.Н.: Очерки горныхь бекствь Бухарскаго ханства. Материалы для статистики
Туркестанскаго края 5, 280–328.
Mae 1879b = Маев, А.Н.: Рекогносцировка горных путей вБухарком ханстве. Известия Императорского
Русского географического общества 15/2, 87–99.
Man ellini, S.– Be dimu ado , A.E. 2019: E alua ing he human impac on he a chaeological landscape o
Sama kand (Uzbekis an). Adiach onic assessmen o he Taylak dis ic by emo e sensing, ield su ey,
and local knowledge. A chaeological Resea ch in Asia 20, 100–143.
Mendelsh am 1975 = Мендельштам, А.М.: Памятники кочевников кушанского времени всеверной Бактрии.
Ленинград.
Okladniko a 1986 = Окладникова, Е.А.: Квопросу окаменных выкладках вдолине реки Елонгаш.
In: К.М. Герасимова (ed.): Традиционная культура народов Централной Азии. Новосибирск, 74–89.
Pugachenko a– R eladze 1990 = Пугаченкова, Г.А.– Ртвеладзе, Э.В.: Северная Бактрия ‑Тохаристан.
Древность иАнтичность. Ташкент.
236 STUDIA HERCYNIA XXVII/1
R eladze 1974 = Ртвеладзе, Э.В.: Разведочное изучение бактрийских памятников на юге Узбекистана.
In: В.М. Массон (ed.): Древняя Бактрия. Предварителние сообшения об археологических работах на
Юуге Узбекистана. Ленинград, 74–85.
S ančo, L. 2009: The ac i i ies in Uzbekis an in he 2008 season. Tes ing he Google Ea h p og amme as
a ool o a chaeological p ospec ing. S udia He cynia 13, 115–122.
S ančo, L. 2019a: Ex ensi e a chaeological su ey. In: S ančo– Tušlo á eds. 2019, 21–30.
S ančo, L. 2019b: The oasis in ime and space. Dynamics o he se lemen pa e n. In: S ančo– Tušlo á
eds. 2019, 353–386.
S ančo, L. 2021: In he shadow o he Wall. Hellenis ic se lemen in he Baysun and Kugi ang piedmon s.
S udia He cynia 25/2, 64–95.
S ančoe al. 2014 = S ančo, L.– Shaydullae , Sh.– Bendezu -Sa mien o, J.– Pažou , A.– Vond o á, H.: Kay i
bu ial si e (sou h Uzbekis an): p elimina y epo o season 2014. S udia He cynia 18/1-2, 31–41.
S ančoe al. 2016 = S ančo, L.– Shaydullae , Sh.– Bendezu -Sa mien o, J.– Lhuillie , J.– Kysela, J.– Shaydul-
lae , A.– Khamido , O.– Ha lík, J.– Tlus á, J.: P elimina y Repo on he Exca a ions a Bu gu Ku gan
in 2015. S udia He cynia 20/2, 86–111.
S ančoe al. 2018 = S ančo, L.– Shaydullae , Sh.– Augus ino á, A.– Ha lík, J.– Smělý, T.– Shaydullae , A.–
Khamido , O.– No ák, V.: P elimina y Repo o he A chaeological Su ey in he Baysun Dis ic (Sou h
Uzbekis an), Season 2017. S udia He cynia 22/1, 134–157.
S ančoe al. 2019 = S ančo, L.– Shaydullae , S.– Khamido , O.– Augus ino á, A.– Damašek, L.– Bek, T.–
Kmošek, M.: In he oo s eps o Eu hydemus. P elimina y epo o a chaeological su ey in he Baysun
Dis ic (Sou h Uzbekis an), Season 2018. S udia He cynia 23/1, 141–172.
S ančoe al. 2020 = S ančo, L.– Khamido , O.– Shaydullae , Sh.– M o á, P.– Vo oubeko á, T.– Bek,
T.– Kmošek, M.: Iskanda Tepa. P elimina y epo o a chaeological exca a ion in season 2018 (sou h
Uzbekis an). S udia He cynia 24/1, 145–158.
S ančo, L.– Tušlo á, P.eds. 2019: She abad Oasis. T acing His o ical Landscape in Sou he n Uzbekis an. P aha.
S ide, S. 2004: Géog aphie a chéologique de la p o ince du Su khan Da ya (Ouzbékis an du Sud / Bac iane du
no d). Unpublished PhD hesis, Uni e si é Pa is I– Pan heon -So bonne. Pa is.
S e chko 2007 = Сверчков, Л.М.: Археология Байсуна– 2004 г. In: Труды Байсунской научной экспедиции.
Археология, история иэтнография 3. Ташкент, 9–19.
Jakub Ha lík
Ins i u e o Classical A chaeology
Facul y o A s, Cha les Uni e si y
Cele ná 20, P ague 1, CZ-110 00
jakub.ha lik@ .cuni.cz
ladisla .s anco@ .cuni.cz
Vendula Dědko á
The Ci y o P ague Museum
Kožná 1, P ague 1, CZ-110 00
dedko a@muzeump ahy.cz
Kah amon Toshalie
Te mez S a e Uni e si y
190100, 42, Fayzulla Khojae
Te mez, Uzbekis an
[email p o ec ed]