ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
5
Wa e ela ions composi ion among Egyp ian co on geno ypes unde wa e de ici
Maamoun A. Abdel-Moneam1 – Waleed A. E. Abido1* – Mohammed H. Ghoneima1 – Ágnes Hadházy2 –
László Zsombik2 – Yase M. El-Mansy3 – Mohab W. El-Shazly3
1Ag onomy Depa men , Facul y o Ag icul u e, Mansou a Uni e si y, Egyp
2Resea ch Ins i u e o Nyi egyhaza, Ins i u es o Ag icul u al Resea ch and Educa ional Fa m, Uni e si y o Deb ecen, Hunga y
3Co on Resea ch Ins i u e, Ag icul u al Resea ch Cen e , Egyp
*Co espondence: [email protected]
SUMMARY
Backg ound: wa e sho age is one o he majo ac o e ec s on g ow h cha ac e s and yield o mos c ops. Objec i e: his s udy was conduc ed
o ge o know he eac ions o some Egyp ian co on geno ypes o wa e de ici . Me hods: The gene ic ma e ials used in his s udy included
hi een co on geno ypes belonging o Gossypium ba badense L., om he Co on Resea ch Ins i u e (CRI), which was de o ed o es ablishing
he expe imen al ma e ials o his in es iga ion. Resul s: he a io o GCA/SCA was less han uni y o all s udied indices, indica ing
p edominance o non-addi i e gene ac ion (dominance and epis asis), which is an impo an in exploi a ion o he e osis h ough hyb id
b eeding. Resul s: The da a showed signi ican educ ion in wa e ela ionship cha ac e s o all pa en al geno ypes unde s ess condi ions.
The Egyp ian a ie y Giza 68 ga e high alues o mos wa e ela ionship cha ac e s. Da a e ealed ha he g ea e he alue o ole ance
index is, he la ge he yield educ ion is unde wa e de ici condi ions and he highe he s ess sensi i i y is becoming. The pa en al geno ypes
Giza 96 showed he highes educ ion in yield unde wa e de ici condi ions. A he same ime, he c oss combina ion Minu y x Aus aly showed
highe alues o yield educ ion ollowed by he combina ions Giza 67 x Aus aly. O he male pa en s, he Russian geno ype 10229 eco ded
he bes GCA alues o mos wa e ela ionship cha ac e s. A he same ime, he emale pa en s, he old Egyp ian geno ype Giza 67 eco ded
he bes alues and exhibi ed good gene al combined o mos wa e ela ionship cha ac e s. The c oss combina ions Giza 86 x Pima S6, Giza
77 x Pima S6, Giza 94 x Dand a and Giza 96 x Aus aly showed signi ican desi able SCA e ec o mos cha ac e s. Conclusion: ela i e
wa e con en %, osmo ic p essu e, chlo ophyll and ca o enoids con en indica es be e a ailabili y o wa e in he cell, which inc eases he
pho osyn he ic a e. Also, he highe le el o p oline accumula ion in he lea es which was eco ded unde de ici wa e sugges s ha he
p oduc ion o p oline is p obably a common esponse o plan unde wa e de ici condi ions.
Keywo ds: co on, wa e ela ions, co ela ion coe icien s, gene al combining abili y, speci ic combining abili y
INTRODUCTION
Wa e sca ci y (sho age) is one o he majo
limi ing ac o s o c op de elopmen and yield. The
an icipa ed demand in addi ional wa e supplies o
ag icul u al p oduc ion will lead o inc ease wa e
sca ci y in nea u u e. Thus, i iga ed c op p oduc ion
such as co on sys em needs a be e managemen o
inc ease wa e use e iciency. B eeding o imp o e
d ough ole an geno ypes equi es o iden i ica ion o
physiological mechanisms and mo phological
cha ac e s con e ing d ough ole ance. In his ega d,
(Iqbal e al., 2011) de ec ed signi ican di e ences
among 80 co on geno ypes o indices o d ough
ole ance. Howe e , (Kashi e al., 2012) no iced
signi ican a ia ion o wa e egimes wi h espec o
some chemical and p oduc i i y cha ac e s. Also,
(Amjid e al., 2016) s a ed ha he co on geno ypes
di e ed signi ican ly o ela i e wa e con en , excised
wa e loss and cell memb ane s abili y. I is in e es ing
o no e ha , he co on pa en s which showed high
alues o RWC% in each condi ion exhibi high alues
in o al wa e con en , ee wa e and bound wa e %,
also showed educed alues in LWD alues as
compa ed wi h he o he pa en s. This due o oxida i e
inju y a he cellula le el unde wa e s ess has high
lipid pe oxida ion, which dec eased s abili ies o cell
memb ane and led o loss mo e wa e om cell
(Sanchez e al., 2002; Abdel-Kade e al., 2015b). The
osmo ic p essu e is conside ed as one o he impo an
mechanisms o wa e de ici ole ance o plan (Khan e
al., 2015), which p omo es he p o ec ion o he plan
cell s uc u es including memb ane and chlo oplas s.
Plan s adjus o wa e s ess by lowe ing issue osmo ic
po en ials by he accumula ion o ino ganic ions and /o
o ganic subs ance o pe mi he main enance o cell
u go . Chlo ophyll con en s as chlo ophyll A and B
plays a i al ole in pho osyn he ic p ocess which
ul ima ely inc ease c op g ow h and yield. The ad e se
e ec o wa e de ici on chlo ophyll con en has
p e iously been showed by (Pi zad e al., 2011; Abdel-
Kade e al., 2015a; Kannan e al., 2017). Howe e ,
(Hamayun e al., 2010) s udied he e ec o d ough
s ess on chlo ophyll and ound ha wa e s ess had
dec eased chlo ophyll A, B and o al chlo ophyll.
Te minal o s ess occu ing du ing he p oduc i e
phase, lowe ing and boll, is known o induce boll
educ ion and educe on boll size and weigh as well as
boll 3 shedding (Zangi, 2010). Besides, he e is a
signi ican dec ease in RWC% unde wa e de ici
condi ions was due o educed abso p ion o wa e om
he soil and inabili ies o con ol wa e loss h ough he
s oma a (Rahman e al., 2008; Anan hi and
Vijaya agha an, 2012; Kuma e al., 2013; Hu e al.,
2013). In addi ion, unde wa e s ess condi ions, he
geno ypes showed signi ican dec eased in me abolic
ac o s, such as dec eased in chlo ophyll (A, B),
ca o enoids con en and enhanced accumula ion o
p oline (Din e al., 2011). Indi ec selec ion o s ess
en i onmen based on pe o mance o i iga ed
ABDEL-MONEAM, M.A. ET AL. ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
6
condi ions would be e ec i e (Anwa e al., 2011).
Thus, he p e- equisi e o success equi es
de e mina ion o he ex en o geno ypic a ia ion
wi hin geno ypes o hese ai s and hei ela i e
con ibu ion o economic yield. The impac o wa e
de ici (a ailabili ies a a m ga e) and insu icien
a ailabili y o wa e du ing he sowing pe iod seems o
be he main eason o lessa ac eage co on c op and
educ ion in co on p oduc ion. The e o e, b eeding o
d ough ole ance co on is an impo an ask and
objec i e. Fo e ec i e b eeding o ole an wa e
de ici co on a ie ies good selec ion c i e ia is needed
o iden i y he ole an co on geno ypes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The p esen s udy was done in he Ag onomy
Depa men , Facul y o Ag icul u e, Mansou a
Uni e si y. The in es iga ion was ca ied ou a Sakha
Ag ic. Res. S a . Ka EL-Sheikh, Ag ic. Res. Cen e ,
Egyp , du ing 2014 and 2015 g owing seasons. Gene ic
ma e ials and expe imen al p ocedu e: The gene ic
ma e ials used in his s udy included hi een co on
geno ypes belonging o Gossypium ba badense L.,
om he Co on Resea ch Ins i u e (CRI), which
de o ed o es ablish he expe imen al ma e ials o his
in es iga ion. Expe imen al design and labo a o y
p ocedu es: The hi een pa en s we e c ossed, in such
away Line x Tes e (9x4) ma ing design by using ou
pa en s as a Tes e pa en s i.e. Dand a, Pima S6,
Aus aly and 10229 and nine co on geno ypes as a Line
pa en s i.e. Giza 45, Minu i, Giza 67, Giza 68, Giza 86,
Giza 77, Giza 94, Giza 96 and Giza 69, in 2014 c op
season o p oduce 36 F1 hyb id seeds, and he o iginal
pa en s we e also sel ed. In 2015 season he 36 F1
hyb ids and hei pa en s we e g own in a andomized
comple e block design (RCBD) wi h h ee eplica es
unde wo i iga ed condi ions. The i s one is he
no mal i iga ed 7 i iga ions du ing he g owing
season and he second is he s ess condi ion, h ee
i iga ions only du ing he g owing season. Each
expe imen al plo consis ed o one ow, measu ing i e
me e s in leng h and 0.70 m in wid h, wi h plan s
spaced 30 cm wi hin ow. Two plan s we e le pe hill
a 4 hinning ime. The ob ained da a we e subjec ed o
di e en s a is ical and biome ical echniques
acco ding o hei ma ing sys em. A sepa a e analysis
o a iance o each cha ac e a each en i onmen was
done (Pelc e al., 1997) o de ec he signi icance o he
obse ed di e ences. Fu he line x es e analysis as
p oposed by (Kemp ho ne, 1957) and adop ed by
(Singh and Chaudha y, 1977) was de ia ed o
pa i ioning he gene ic a iance o he F1 op c osses
due o lines, es e s and hei in e ac ions, p o ide
in o ma ions abou gene al and speci ic combining
abili ies o he pa en s and c osses (Table 1). In
addi ion, i also p o ides addi ional in o ma ions abou
he a ious ypes o gene e ec s.
Table 1. The o m o he analysis o a iance o line x es e analysis
S.O.V
D
M.S
E.M.S
Replica ion
-1
MS
Geno ypes
g-1
MSg
σ2e + σ2g
Pa en s
p-1
σ2e + σ2p
C osses
c-1
σ2e + σ2e
Pa en s s C osses
1
Lines
l-1
M1
σ2e + ((Co .F.s-2Co .H.s) + (Co .H.s))
Tes e s
-1
M2
σ2e + ((Co .F.s-2Co .H.s) + l (Co .H.s))
Lines x Tes e s
(l-1)( -1)
M3
σ2e + ((Co .F.s-2Co .H.s)
E o
( -1)(g-1)
M4
σ2e
Whe e, , g, p, c a e he numbe o eplica ions, geno ypes, pa en s and c osses espec i ely.; L = numbe o lines ( emale pa en s).; = numbe
o es e s (male pa en s).; σ2e = plo en i onmen al a iance.
Gene ic componen s
Acco ding o (Kemp ho ne, 1957; Kea sey and
Pooni, 1996) he a iance o gene al and speci ic
combining abili ies o each expe imen was compu ed
om he co a iance's o ull and hal sib amilies as
ollows:
Co Hs (lines) = M1−M3
;
Co Hs ( es e s) = M2−M3
l ; Co Hs (a e age) = 1
(2l −l− ){(l−1)(Ml)+( −1)(M )
l+ −2 −Ml }
σ2 gca = Co Hs = (1+F)
4 = 1
2σ2A ; σ2 sca = Ml −Me
= Co ull sib.; σ2 D = Co ull sib - 2Co Hs.; σ2 sca =
(1+F
2)2= σ2 D
σ2 D = σ2 sca
ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
7
whe e, Co Hs = is he co a iance hal sibs.; Co Fs =
is he co a iance ull sibs.; σ2gca, σ2sca = a e he
a iance o gene al and speci ic combining abili y.;
σ2A, σ2 D = a e he componen o gene ic a iance due
o addi i e and dominance a iances.; F = is he
coe icien o inb eeding which was conside ed equal
one.; σ2 G = σ2 A + σ2 D
Es ima es o he e osis
The alues o he e osis we e de e mined as he
pe cen age de ia ion om he F1s hyb ids o e he
be e pa en s (B.P.) as ollow:
H (B.P.) = F1−B.P
B.P 𝑋100.
The signi icance o he e osis was es ed using he
leas signi ican di e ences alue (L.S.D) a 0.5% le el
o p obabili ies acco ding o he o mula o (S eel e al.,
1997)
L.S.D a 0.05 = 0.05 x sd , sd = √2𝑀𝑠𝑒
𝑟
Gene al and speci ic combining abili ies e ec s
a. Gene al combining abili ies:
Lines g1 = x1..
−x..
l
Tes e s gj = xj…
l −x…
l
Whe e, g1= is he gene al combining abili y e ec .; Xi...
= is he o al alue o c osses in which he line in ol ed
o e eplica ions.; Xj... = is he o al alue o c osses in
which he es e in ol ed o e eplica ions.; X... = is he
gene al o al o c osses; R, l, = a e he numbe o
eplica ions, line and es e s espec i ely.
b. Speci ic combining abili y:
Sij = xij..
−xi..
−xj..
l −x..
l
Whe e, Sij= is he speci ic combining abili y e ec s;
Xij = is he o al alue o c osses be ween lines and
es e s o e eplica ions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Analysis o a iance o wa e ela ions lea es
chemical composi ion and d ough ole ance indices a e
shown in Tables 2 and 3. The da a e ealed signi ican
di e ences among he geno ypes o all s udied
cha ac e s, indica ing he p esence o conside able
amoun o gene ic a iabili ies among he e alua ed
geno ypes. Such a ia ion could be a ibu ed o he
a ied gene ic backg ound. Fu he pa i ioning o
geno ypes means squa es o hei componen s exhibi ed
ha pa en s mean squa es we e signi ican o all
s udied cha ac e s unde s ess and no mal condi ions,
showing su icien a iabili ies among he pa en s
which can gene a e po en ial and p omising hyb ids.
The a iance due o males and emales we e also
signi ican o mos s udied cha ac e s and majo i y
han he a iance due o in e ac ions (lines x es e s),
hese esul s indica ed ha he expe imen al ma e ials
possessed conside able a iabili ies and he wo ypes
o combining abili ies we e in ol ed in he gene ic
exp ession o hese cha ac e s. The es e s con ibu ed
a majo sha e o he gene ic a iance in espec o mos
physiological and chemical cha ac e s unde s ess and
non-s ess condi ions. In his ega d, (Iqbal e al., 2011;
Kashi e al., 2012; Amjid e al., 2016).
Table 2. Analysis o a iance o line x es e and combining abili y o wa e ela ions and lea es chemical composi ion unde
no mal and wa e s ess condi ions
S.O.V
D
To al wa e con en
(%)
F ee wa e
(%)
Bound wa e
(%)
Lea wa e de ici
(%)
Rela i e wa e con en
(%)
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
Replica ion
2
0.14
0.12
0.05
0.01
0.36
0.06
0.01
0.14
17.52**
7.70**
Geno ypes
48
67.50**
21.96**
2.34**
0.48**
45.85**
17.45**
3.52**
5.62**
74.86**
14.31**
Pa en s
12
4.28**
3.10**
0.49**
0.21**
1.99**
2.38**
2.81**
1.90**
4.78**
2.99**
C osses
35
27.15**
14.08**
1.03**
0.52**
18.92**
9.94**
1.76**
1.69**
30.73**
12.16**
Pa en s s
C osses
1
2238.3
523.6**
70.38**
2.01**
1514.9**
460.99**
73.77**
187.70**
2460.4**
225.50**
Lines
8
24.99**
10.95**
1.06**
0.50**
16.75**
7.28**
2.27**
1.26**
26.35**
8.93**
Tes e s
3
112.71**
21.87**
1.49**
0.32**
89.58**
17.01**
2.56**
2.80**
79.07**
16.96**
Lines x Tes e s
24
17.17**
14.16**
0.96**
0.56**
10.80**
9.94**
1.49**
1.69**
26.14**
12.64**
E o
96
1.15
0.85
0.05
0.02
0.88
0.68
0.10
0.11
2.36
1.20
σ2 GCA
0.18
-0.001
0.001
-0.001
0.15
-0.0001
0.01
-0.0001
0.1
-0.01
σ2 SCA
5.29
4.46
0.30
0.18
3.29
3.12
0.47
0.53
7.68
3.76
σ2 GCA/ σ2 SCA
0.03
-0.0002
0.003
-0.006
0.05
0.00
0.02
-0.0002
0.01
-0.003
CV %
1.27
1.33
1.91
1.62
1.28
1.37
3.54
3.31
2.02
1.81
ABDEL-MONEAM, M.A. ET AL. ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
8
Table 2. con inued
S.O.V
D
Osmo ic p essu e
(ba )
Chlo ophyll A
(mg g-1 dw )
Chlo ophyll B
(mg g-1 dw )
Ca o enoides
(mg g-1 dw )
P oline
(mg g-1 w )
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
Replica ion
2
0.003
0.02
0.01
0.001
0.001
0.0001
0.003
0.001
9.47
188.30
Geno ypes
48
1.47**
1.46**
0.29**
0.10**
0.02**
0.01**
0.04**
0.02**
5014.6**
12172.9**
Pa en s
12
0.73**
0.60**
0.10**
0.01*
0.01**
0.01**
0.01**
0.003**
201.58**
108.66
C osses
35
0.30**
0.42**
0.16**
0.12**
0.02**
0.02**
0.03**
0.018**
4725.39**
4713.9**
Pa en s s C osses
1
51.35**
48.15**
7.02**
0.36**
0.33**
0.079**
1.05**
0.23**
72891.88**
418009.02**
Lines
8
0.38**
0.31**
0.16**
0.12**
0.02**
0.02**
0.03**
0.02**
6050.74**
3523.62**
Tes e s
3
0.45**
0.70**
0.13**
0.09**
0.02**
0.003**
0.02**
0.03**
6815.01**
7810.29**
Lines x Tes e s
24
0.25**
0.42**
0.17**
0.12**
0.02**
0.02**
0.02**
0.02**
4022.40**
4723.55**
E o
96
0.013
0.024
0.007
0.004
0.001
0.0004
0.001
0.001
189.40
229.02
σ2 GCA
0.001
-0.00
-0.0001
0.0001
-0.00
-0.00
0.00
0.00
12.64
-0.17
σ2 SCA
0.08
0.13
0.05
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
1257.21
1474.68
σ2 GCA/ σ2 SCA
0.01
0.00
-0.002
0.003
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0101
-0.0001
CV %
2.96
3.13
2.25
2.08
1.77
1.56
2.32
2.22
4.37
2.56
*, ** Signi ican a 0.05 and 0.01 p obabili y le els, espec i ely, N = no mal i iga ion and S = wa e s ess
Table 3. Analysis o a iance o he s udied co on geno ypes o d ough ole ance indices unde no mal and wa e s ess condi ions
S.O.V
D
Tol
M.P.
H.M.
S.S.I.
G.M.P.
S.T.I.
Y.I.
Y.S.I
R.D.I
D.I.
Replica ion
2
38.76
17.30
10.87
0.05
13.58
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.01
0.01
Geno ypes
48
309.65**
376.38**
391.45**
0.55**
381.21*
0.03**
0.10**
0.03**
0.05**
0.12**
Pa en s
12
367.24**
418.59**
482.05**
0.93**
446.41*
0.05**
0.13**
0.05**
0.09**
0.17**
C osses
35
293.22**
299.66**
298.22**
0.43**
296.44**
0.02**
0.07**
0.02**
0.04**
0.10**
Pa en s s C osses
1
193.62**
2554.96**
2567.36**
0.06
2565.43*
0.003
0.44**
0.003
0.01
0.22**
Lines
8
558.07**
168.81**
150.72**
0.81**
155.63**
0.04**
0.04**
0.04**
0.07**
0.11**
Tes e s
3
175.06**
490.64**
586.95**
0.49**
537.90**
0.03**
0.17**
0.03**
0.05**
0.20**
Lines x Tes e s
24
219.70**
319.40**
311.29**
0.30**
313.20**
0.02**
0.07**
0.02**
0.03**
0.08**
E o
96
34.28
44.70
42.84
0.05
43.46
0.003
0.009
0.003
0.01
0.01
σ2 GCA
1.32
-0.36
-0.24
0.002
-0.30
0.0001
0.00
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
σ2 SCA
60.11
93.31
91.27
0.08
91.69
0.004
0.02
0.004
0.01
0.02
σ2 GCA/ σ2 SCA
0.02
-0.004
-0.003
0.03
-0.003
0.03
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.02
CV %
26.69
8.99
9.05
20.68
8.99
7.05
9.90
7.05
7.04
14.15
*, ** Signi ican a 0.05 and 0.01 p obabili y le els, espec i ely, N = no mal i iga ion and S = wa e s ess
D ough indices which p o ide a measu e o
d ough based on loss o yield unde d ough condi ions
in compa es o no mal condi ions. The analysis o
a iance (Table 3) showed highly signi ican o all
d ough ole ance indices, which indica ed ha
geno ypes we e di e ing o genes con olling such
cha ac e s. Signi ican di e ences we e de ec ed
among pa en s, hyb ids and pa en 's s hyb ids o mos
indices, indica ing he exis ence o a iabili ies among
pa en s and ansmi ed o c oss combina ions.
Es ima es o a iances due o gene al and speci ic
combining abili ies o indices unde s udy a e
p esen ed in Table 3. Gene al combining abili y o
emale pa en s, es e s, we e highly signi ican o all
s udied indices and la ge in magni ude han male
pa en s. Howe e , SCA a iances which due o
in e ac ions o line x es e s we e also high signi ican
o all s udied indices. The a io o GCA/SCA was less
han uni y o all s udied indices, indica ing
p edominance o non-addi i e gene ac ion (dominance
and epis asis), which is an impo an in exploi a ion o
he e osis h ough hyb id b eeding. Hence, subs an ial
imp o emen in hese indices may be achie ed h ough
ecu en selec ion ollowed by selec ion unde s ess
condi ions. The SCA a iances we e g ea e han GCA
o all s udied cha ac e s unde s ess and non-s ess
condi ions, indica ing mo e impo an ole o non-
addi i e ype o gene e ec .
The p opo ional con ibu ions o lines ( emales)
and es e s (males) and hei in e ac ions o he o al
a iance o di e en cha ac e s a e p esen ed in Tables
4 and 5. The da a e ealed ha he maximum
con ibu ion o he o al a iance o mos s udied
cha ac e s in bo h no mal and s ess condi ions we e
made by lines x es e s (male x emale in e ac ion). A
he same ime, he 7 con ibu ion due o line pa en s
we e g ea e han con ibu ion due o es e s in he
s ess condi ion. The physiological pa ame e s such as
ela i e lea wa e con en (RWC), lea wa e de ici
(LWD), osmo ic p essu e (OPCS), chlo ophyll A,
chlo ophyll B, ca o enoids and lea p oline
accumula ion a e some sensi i e physiological and
biochemical indica o used o s udy he esponse o
co on plan s unde s ess condi ion. The da a p esen ed
ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
9
in Table 6 show signi ican educ ion in wa e
ela ionship cha ac e s o all pa en al geno ypes unde
s ess condi ion. The highes RWC% was obse ed by
he pa en s Giza 77 ollowed by Giza 86 and Giza 67
unde no mal and s ess condi ions. On he o he side,
he Egyp ian ex a-long s aple a ie y Minu y and Giza
96 showed he lowes alues o RWC% unde no mal
and s ess condi ions. The Egyp ian a ie y Dand a
showed dec eased in RWC% and LWD%. The
Egyp ian a ie y Giza 68 (as a common pa en o mos
ex a-long a ie ies) ga e high alues o mos wa e
ela ionship cha ac e s. The obse ed signi ican
dec ease in RWC% unde wa e de ici condi ions was
due o educed abso p ion o wa e om he soil and
inabili ies o con ol wa e loss h ough he s oma a.
Simila esul s we e ob ained by (Anan hi and
Vijaya agha an, 2012; Kuma e al., 2012, Hu e al.,
2013). I is in e es ing o no e ha , he co on pa en s
which showed high alues o RWC% in each condi ion
exhibi high alues in o al wa e con en , ee wa e
and bound wa e %, also showed educed alues in
LWD alues as compa ed wi h he o he pa en s. This
due o oxida i e inju y a he cellula le el unde wa e
s ess has high lipid pe oxida ion, which dec eased
s abili ies o cell memb ane and led o loss mo e wa e
om cell (Abdel-Kade e al., 2015b). The highes
RWC% was eco ded by he c oss combina ions Giza
77 x Pima S6 ollowed by Giza 86 x Dand a, Giza 86 x
10229 and Giza 99 x Dand a unde well i iga ed and
de ici condi ions. These combina ions su passed all
c osses in wa e ela ion cha ac e s unde s ess and
no mal condi ions. Geno ypic a ia ion o lea wa e
ela ion may be a ibu ed o he di e ences in abili ies
o abso p ion mo e wa e om he soil and he abili ies
o educe wa e loss h ough s oma a. I may be also due
o di e ences in abili ies o geno ypes o main ain
issue ige and hence physiological ac i i ies (Khan e
al., 2015). Da a illus a ed in Table 6 e ealed ha all
13 co on pa en s exhibi ed some deg ee o osmo ic
adjus men in esponse o wa e de ici . The pa en s
Giza 77, Giza 68 and Giza 67 showed he lowe ing
alues o osmo ic p essu e in cell issue unde no mal
and de ici condi ions. Howe e , he pa en s Dand a,
Giza 69, Giza 96 and Aus aly mani es ed high osmo ic
alues o e bo h condi ions. The imp o emen o
osmo ic p essu e usually indica es highe wa e
e en ion capaci y and a lowe a e o wa e loss wi h
highe RWC%. The c oss-combina ion Giza 67 x
PimaS6 ollowed by Giza 68 x PimaS6, Giza 86 x
10229, Giza 94 x Dand a and Giza 77 x PimaS6
eco ded he lowes alues o osmo ic p essu e unde
no mal and s ess condi ions. These c oss combina ions
showed some so o ole an wa e de ici . On he o he
side, he combina ions Giza 45 x PimaS6 ollowed by
Giza 86 x Dand a, Giza 69 x Dand a and Giza 69 x
Aus aly showed he highes O.P.C.S alues. Simila
esul s was ob ained by (Rahman e al., 2008).
Chlo ophyll con en s as chlo ophyll A and B plays a
i al ole in pho osyn he ic p ocess which ul ima ely
inc ease c op g ow h and yield. Da a illus a ed in
Table 6 showed ha unde wa e de ici condi ions.
Chlo ophyll A and B alues as mg g-1 d y weigh we e
educed o he lowes amoun . The pa en al co on
geno ypes di e ed signi ican ly o chlo ophyll
con en s unde no mal and s ess condi ions. The
highes alues o chlo ophyll A we e eco ded by Giza
77 ollowed by Giza 68 and Giza 86 unde no mal and
s ess condi ions. On he o he side, he lowes alues
we e eco ded o Giza 96 ollowed by Giza 69 and
Minu y unde no mal and s ess condi ions. A he same
ime, he alues o chlo ophyll B we e signi ican ly
di e en among co on geno ypes. The pa en s which,
eco ded high alues o chlo ophyll A unde s ess
condi ion, also eco ded high alues o chlo ophyll B.
A highe alues o chlo ophyll con en helps he plan s
o wi hs and wa e s ess h ough be e a ailabili ies o
chlo ophyll, hese esul s a e in good way wi h hose
ob ained by (Hamayun e al., 2010; Pi zad e al., 2011;
Abdel-Kade e al., 2015a; Kannan e al., 2017). The
highes alues we e eco ded by Giza 77 ollowed by
Giza 68, 10229 and PimaS6 unde no mal condi ions,
while Giza 77, Giza 68 and Giza 86 eco ded he
highes alues unde s ess condi ions. I is in e es o
no e ha geno ypes wi h high alues o ca o enoids
concen a ion unde d ough condi ions eco ded high
alues o chlo ophyll A o /and B. The dec emen o
chlo ophyll con en unde d ough o wa e de ici
s ess could be ela ed o pho o oxida ion esul ing om
oxida i e s ess, which may be o ma ion o ee
adicals, which lead o causes o chlo ophyll damage
h ough he oxida i e, which educes pho osyn he ic
p ocess. Unde s ess condi ions, ca o enoids and o he
pigmen a ion may be abso p ion o he hu ul sub
which o med as a esul 9 o ee adicals and a oid he
chlo ophyll om damage. D ough s ess can also al e
he issue concen a ions o chlo ophyll and
ca o enoids. P oline is one o he osmop o ec an s
o med in issues enable he plan o main ain low wa e
po en ials ha allows addi ional wa e up ake om he
s ess condi ion, hus bu e ing he immedia e e ec o
wa e de ici . P oline accumula ion helps he plan s o
minimize he dehyd a ion damage o he cell
memb ane. The esul s showed ha , unde wa e s ess
condi ions, he geno ypes showed signi ican dec eased
in me abolic ac o s, such as dec eased in chlo ophyll
(A, B), ca o enoids con en and enhanced accumula ion
o p oline (Din e al., 2011; Kannan e al., 2017).
Accumula ion o p oline is a widesp ead plan esponse
o wa e de ici . P oline accumula ion is belie ed o
play adap i e oles in plan s ess ole ance. Wa e
de ici has a posi i e inc ease in he lea accumula ed
p oline le els Table 6. The pa en al geno ypes showed
signi icance di e ences in p oline accumula ed unde
no mal and s ess condi ions. The pa en al geno ypes
Giza 77 ollowed by Giza 68 and Giza 86 eco ded he
highes alues o p oline accumula ed in lea unde
s ess condi ions. On he o he side, pa en al geno ypes
which showed high alues o p oline accumula ion
unde no mal condi ions ga e he lowes alues o
p oline unde s ess condi ions. Simila esul s we e
ob ained by (Kannan e al., 2017).

ABDEL-MONEAM, M.A. ET AL. ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
10
Table 4. P opo ional con ibu ion o lines, es e s and hei in e ac ion o o al a iance o wa e ela ions and lea es chemical
composi ion unde no mal and wa e s ess condi ions
Sou ce
To al wa e con en
(%)
F ee wa e
(%)
Bound wa e
(%)
Lea wa e de ici
(%)
Rela i e wa e con en
(%)
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
Lines
21.04
17.76
23.51
21.81
20.24
16.74
29.43
17.05
19.60
16.78
Tes e
35.59
13.31
12.38
5.26
40.59
14.67
12.43
14.22
22.06
11.96
Lines x
Tes e
43.37
68.92
64.11
72.93
39.17
68.59
58.13
68.73
58.34
71.26
N = no mal i iga ion and S = wa e s ess
Table 4. con inued
Sou ce
Osmo ic p essu e
(ba )
Chlo ophyll A
(mg g-1 dw )
Chlo ophyll B
(mg g-1 dw )
Ca o enoides
(mg g-1 dw )
P oline
(mg g-1 w )
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
Lines
29.18
17.06
22.48
22.91
19.11
23.27
26.96
22.41
29.27
17.09
Tes e
12.75
14.28
6.58
6.79
6.71
1.63
8.11
11.84
12.36
14.20
Lines x
Tes e
58.06
68.65
70.94
70.30
74.18
75.11
64.93
65.76
58.37
68.71
N = no mal i iga ion and S = wa e s ess
Table 5. P opo ional con ibu ion o lines, es e s and hei in e ac ion o o al a iance o d ough ole ance indices unde no mal
and wa e s ess condi ions
Sou ce
Tol
M.P.
H.M.
S.S.I.
G.M.P.
S.T.I.
Y.I.
Y.S.I
R.D.I
D.I.
Lines
43.50
12.88
11.55
42.83
12
42.79
13.78
42.79
42.82
25.21
Tes e
5.12
14.03
16.87
9.61
15.55
9.62
19.68
9.62
9.63
18
Lines x Tes e
51.38
73.09
71.58
47.56
72.45
47.59
66.54
47.59
47.56
56.78
N = no mal i iga ion and S = wa e s ess
Di e en d ough ole ance indices we e calcula ed
on he basis o yield o he geno ypes unde well
i iga ed (Yp) and wa e de ici condi ions (Ys) as
shown in Table 7. Da a e ealed ha g ea e he alue
o ole ance index la ge he yield educ ion unde
wa e de ici condi ions and highe he s ess
sensi i i y. The geno ypes, pa en s and hyb ids we e
signi ican ly di e ences. The pa en al geno ypes Giza
96 ollowed by Minu y and 10229 showed he highes
educ ion in yield unde wa e de ici condi ions. The
c oss combina ions which in ol ed Giza 96 as a
common pa en eco ded highe alues o ole ance
index. In he same ime, he c oss combina ion Minu y
x Aus aly showed he highe alues o yield educ ion
ollowed by he combina ions Giza 67 x Aus aly and
Giza 69 x Aus aly. On he e e se end, s ess
ole ance index (STI), which can be used o iden i y
geno ypes ha p oduce high yield unde s ess and non-
s ess condi ions. A la ge alue o s ess ole ance index
(STI) show mo e ole an o s ess. O he yield-based
es ima es o s ess esis ance a e mean p oduc i i y,
geome ic mean and 10 ha monic mean. The geome ic
mean is o en used by b eede s in e es ed in ela i e
pe o mance since wa e de ici s ess can a y in
se e i y in ield en i onmen o e ime. S ess sensi i e
index (SSI) showed low amoun alues (less han
uni y), indica ed high ole ance o geno ypes o wa e
de ici (Zangi, 2005). To de e mine he mos desi able
d ough ole ance c i e ia, co ela ion coe icien
be ween yield in well i iga ion, yield in s ess and
o he ole an indices we e calcula ed Table 8. The
yield (Yn) unde well i iga ed condi ions ha e a s ong
associa ion wi h (Ys) yield unde s ess condi ions and
wi h mos o he ole an indices depic ing ha high
yield po en ial unde well condi ions ga e supe io
yield unde s ess condi ions and he loss o yield was
ela i ely small. The e o e, indi ec selec ion o s ess
en i onmen based on pe o mance o i iga ed
condi ions would be e ec i e (Anwa e al., 2011).
Da a illus a ed in Table 8 e ealed ha a la ge alue
o ole an index show mo e sensi i i y o wa e de ici
since co ela ion coe icien s be ween ole an index
and o he yield indices we e nega i e and signi ican .
Thus, a smalle alue o ole an index is a o ed o
selec ion, based on ole an index a o geno ypes wi h
low yield po en ial and high yield unde s ess
condi ions. Simila esul s we e ob ained by (Zangi,
2005).
ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
11
Table 6. Mean pe o mance o co on geno ypes o wa e ela ions and lea es chemical composi ion unde no mal and wa e s ess
condi ions
Geno ypes
To al wa e con en
(%)
F ee wa e
(%)
Bound wa e
(%)
Lea wa e de ici
(%)
Rela i e wa e
con en (%)
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
L1- Giza 45
77.77
67.69
10.17
9.21
67.6
58.48
10.33
8.74
69.85
60.82
L2- Minu y
77.4
63.78
10.1
8.68
67.3
55.1
10.07
8.06
68.98
56.84
L3- Giza 67
79.01
66.65
10.51
9.22
68.5
57.43
9.08
7.28
70.21
59.23
L4- Giza 68
79.54
65.82
10.6
9.12
68.95
56.7
8.17
6.5
70.1
58.01
L5- Giza 86
78.76
65.57
10.49
9.08
68.27
56.49
9.35
7.44
70.22
58.46
L6- Giza 77
79.02
66.32
10.55
9.2
68.47
57.12
8.4
6.74
70.32
59.02
L7- Giza 94
78.53
65.69
10.42
9.07
68.11
56.62
9.34
7.8
69.41
58.06
L8- Giza 96
76.05
65.17
9.37
8.38
66.68
56.79
11.37
8.77
66.95
57.37
L9- Giza 69
75.65
65.19
9.56
8.59
66.09
56.6
10.98
8.66
67.61
58.26
T1- Dand a
76.97
67.43
9.67
8.82
67.3
58.61
10.87
8.91
66.87
58.6
T2- Pima S6
77.72
66.49
10.22
9.09
67.5
57.4
10.08
8.16
69.58
59.53
T3- Aus aly
76.94
65.56
9.9
8.78
67.04
56.78
10.35
8.59
68.14
58.05
T4- 10229
78.45
65.93
10.28
8.99
68.18
56.94
10.01
8.33
69.81
58.66
Giza 45 x Dand a
83.13
69.34
11.21
9.1
71.92
60.24
8.76
10.68
75.72
61.4
Giza 45 x Pima S6
79.6
66.49
10.32
8.36
69.28
58.13
10.1
11.86
70.12
56.8
Giza 45 x Aus aly
84.3
66.89
11.36
8.76
72.94
58.13
9.32
11.69
76.74
59.14
Giza 45 x 10229
88.25
72.19
12.07
9.67
76.19
62.53
7.96
10.02
79.64
63.39
Minu y x Dand a
87.91
72.52
12.22
9.54
75.69
62.98
7.3
9.85
82.2
63.67
Minu y x Pima S6
85.63
69.93
11.59
9.23
74.04
60.7
8.36
10.59
77.61
61.63
Minu y x Aus aly
88.85
71.66
12.15
9.42
76.7
62.24
7.76
10.08
81.48
62.89
Minu y x 10229
86.28
70.34
11.84
9.43
74.44
60.91
8.62
10.53
77.75
61.63
Giza 67 x Dand a
87.75
72.29
12.1
9.67
75.65
62.63
7.33
9.99
79.54
63.27
Giza 67 x Pima S6
88.61
71.68
11.81
9.28
76.8
62.4
7.78
10.09
79.95
62.52
Giza 67 x Aus aly
88.27
71.02
12.26
9.49
76.01
61.53
7.99
10.29
80.75
62.14
Giza 67 x 10229
90.62
70.9
12.34
9.46
78.28
61.44
7.61
10.43
81.05
63.69
Giza 68 x Dand a
83.12
67.33
11.41
9
71.71
58.33
8.82
11.57
74.23
58.38
Giza 68 x Pima S6
88.51
70.79
11.93
9.33
76.58
61.46
7.84
10.41
79.75
62.03
Giza 68 x Aus aly
89.6
73.76
11.91
9.32
77.69
64.44
7.47
9.17
81.26
63.11
Giza 68 x 10229
88.07
70.56
11.23
8.74
76.84
61.82
7.85
10.33
78.5
61.15
Giza 86 x Dand a
83.85
68.17
11.5
9.11
72.35
59.06
8.54
11.16
75.72
64.48
Giza 86 x Pima S6
90.79
71.39
11.94
9.56
75.38
61.84
8.25
10.27
77.93
61.94
Giza 86 x Aus aly
85.78
69.5
11.58
9.18
74.2
60.32
8.75
10.7
77.76
61.25
Giza 86 x 10229
89.41
71.8
12.33
9.45
77.09
62.36
7.6
10.04
83.43
63.66
Giza 77 x Dand a
81.75
66.73
11.24
8.93
70.51
57.8
9.33
12.01
73.72
58.41
Giza 77 x Pima S6
89.54
73.2
12.26
9.81
77.28
63.39
7.55
9.62
80.79
64.29
Giza 77 x Aus aly
85.79
70.15
11.37
9.07
74.43
61.09
8.74
10.51
76.93
61.16
Giza 77 x 10229
90.6
71.33
12.19
9.38
78.42
61.95
7.65
10.15
81.74
62.61
Giza 94 x Dand a
88.02
73.29
12.46
9.78
75.56
63.51
7.31
9.39
81.7
63.81
Giza 94 x Pima S6
88.58
70.21
12.18
9.41
76.41
60.8
7.86
10.56
80.17
61.52
Giza 94 x Aus aly
86.28
69.63
11.63
9.14
74.65
60.49
8.57
10.66
77.87
61.09
Giza 94 x 10229
88.63
70.83
11.48
8.93
77.15
61.9
7.71
10.32
77.97
60.57
Giza 96 x Dand a
80.05
66.04
10.2
8.17
69.85
57.88
9.87
12.06
71.44
57.17
Giza 96 x Pima S6
84.33
67.39
11.53
8.97
72.8
58.43
9.35
11.62
75.52
58.6
Giza 96 x Aus aly
88.71
72.52
12.41
9.7
76.3
62.83
7.87
9.75
81.89
59.81
Giza 96 x 10229
87.32
71.68
12.27
9.47
78.53
62.21
7.58
10.11
82.24
63.2
Giza 69 x Dand a
81.09
67.16
10.59
8.52
70.51
58.64
9.47
11.51
73.46
59.07
Giza 69 x Pima S6
84.33
66.67
10.77
8.25
73.57
58.42
9.17
11.69
75.21
57.72
Giza 69 x Aus aly
89.13
71.62
12.29
9.59
76.84
62.03
7.69
10.14
80.15
62.16
Giza 69 x 10229
87.65
70.9
11.58
9.17
76.07
61.74
8.07
10.26
78.59
61.81
LSD (0.05)
1.73
1.49
0.35
0.24
1.52
1.33
0.497
0.53
2.48
1.77
ABDEL-MONEAM, M.A. ET AL. ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
12
Table 6. con inued
Geno ypes
Osmo ic p essu e
(ba )
Chlo ophyll A
(mg g-1 dw )
Chlo ophyll B
(mg g-1 dw )
Ca o enoides
(mg g-1 dw )
P oline
(mg g-1 w )
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
S
L1- Giza 45
4.72
3.81
3.2
3.01
1.28
1.12
1.44
1.33
353.45
665.76
L2- Minu y
4.81
3.98
3.18
2.99
1.27
1.15
1.39
1.34
355.99
675.36
L3- Giza 67
4.29
3.67
3.34
3.13
1.31
1.23
1.50
1.31
343.48
684.48
L4- Giza 68
4.14
3.37
3.51
3.07
1.33
1.24
1.56
1.37
341.61
685.33
L5- Giza 86
4.43
3.61
3.45
3.16
1.32
1.23
1.52
1.36
343.84
685.82
L6- Giza 77
4.18
3.37
3.56
3.09
1.34
1.24
1.57
1.37
343.51
684.66
L7- Giza 94
4.51
3.84
3.26
3.05
1.3
1.22
1.47
1.35
345.54
679.6
L8- Giza 96
5.7
4.78
3.01
2.93
1.37
1.15
1.38
1.26
363.67
683.18
L9- Giza 69
5.48
4.64
3.07
3.00
1.4
1.17
1.44
1.29
364.22
680.53
T1- Dand a
5.22
4.34
3.17
3.14
1.38
1.18
1.47
1.29
360.71
672.25
T2- Pima S6
4.71
4.1
3.39
3.1
1.41
1.21
1.55
1.35
353.06
676.8
T3- Aus aly
5.12
4.38
3.23
3.07
1.41
1.19
1.5
1.32
359.91
675.56
T4- 10229
4.57
4.04
3.44
3.06
1.42
1.22
1.57
1.36
350.26
675.04
Giza 45 x Dand a
3.62
5.36
3.59
3.04
1.39
1.2
1.6
1.35
327.84
564.34
Giza 45 x Pima S6
4.17
5.94
3.3
2.77
1.29
1.09
1.53
1.29
393.18
626.99
Giza 45 x Aus aly
3.85
5.86
3.37
2.85
1.35
1.16
1.5
1.27
357.44
618
Giza 45 x 10229
3.29
5.02
4.07
3.43
1.58
1.34
1.79
1.5
285.55
529.72
Minu y x Dand a
3.22
5.06
4.1
3.42
1.53
1.32
1.82
1.52
250.66
520.46
Minu y x Pima S6
3.46
5.31
3.73
3.15
1.44
1.24
1.67
1.41
306.7
559.85
Minu y x Aus aly
3.2
5.06
3.96
3.36
1.51
1.3
1.78
1.5
274.97
532.89
Minu y x 10229
3.56
5.28
3.85
3.26
1.53
1.3
1.7
1.44
320.71
556.41
Giza 67 x Dand a
3.03
5.01
4
3.36
1.5
1.31
1.77
1.48
252.25
527.87
Giza 67 x Pima S6
3.02
4.94
3.88
3.29
1.47
1.26
1.73
1.47
276.3
533.15
Giza 67 x Aus aly
3.31
5.16
3.85
3.26
1.5
1.28
1.69
1.44
287.4
543.72
Giza 67 x 10229
3.15
5.22
3.93
3.28
1.52
1.3
1.72
1.44
267.04
551.13
Giza 68 x Dand a
3.65
5.79
3.6
3.02
1.42
1.24
1.57
1.31
331.28
611.4
Giza 68 x Pima S6
3.09
4.6
3.86
3.26
1.48
1.28
1.7
1.44
279.21
550.07
Giza 68 x Aus aly
3.24
5.21
3.97
3.31
1.45
1.22
1.85
1.54
280
545.84
Giza 68 x 10229
3.24
5.18
3.68
3.09
1.36
1.15
1.7
1.42
259.91
484.52
Giza 86 x Dand a
3.53
5.59
3.67
3.1
1.43
1.26
1.61
1.36
316.48
589.72
Giza 86 x Pima S6
3.41
5.15
3.96
3.34
1.56
1.32
1.72
1.45
300.88
542.67
Giza 86 x Aus aly
3.62
5.36
3.68
3.11
1.44
1.23
1.66
1.4
327.58
565.4
Giza 86 x 10229
3.15
5.03
3.84
3.22
1.46
1.24
1.72
1.44
266.78
530.51
Giza 77 x Dand a
3.19
5.08
3.51
2.98
1.39
1.23
1.56
1.32
358.24
634.65
Giza 77 x Pima S6
3.13
4.83
4.14
3.5
1.59
1.36
1.82
1.54
378.79
637.3
Giza 77 x Aus aly
3.62
5.27
3.77
3.17
1.46
1.23
1.68
1.42
327.05
555.62
Giza 77 x 10229
3.15
5.09
3.93
3.33
1.51
1.3
1.75
1.48
269.16
536.33
Giza 94 x Dand a
3.02
4.71
4.11
3.48
1.55
1.35
1.78
1.52
251.19
496.15
Giza 94 x Pima S6
3.26
5.29
3.89
3.25
1.51
1.3
1.72
1.43
280.53
558.26
Giza 94 x Aus aly
3.54
5.34
3.79
3.2
1.48
1.27
1.69
1.42
318.06
563.29
Giza 94 x 10229
3.19
5.17
3.64
3.09
1.35
1.17
1.69
1.43
272.33
545.31
Giza 96 x Dand a
4.08
6.04
3.3
2.76
1.27
1.08
1.51
1.26
264.14
508.57
Giza 96 x Pima S6
3.86
5.82
3.58
3.01
1.45
1.24
1.57
1.32
359.3
614.3
Giza 96 x Aus aly
3.25
4.89
3.98
3.38
1.54
1.32
1.75
1.48
280.79
515.44
Giza 96 x 10229
3.12
5.06
3.88
3.28
1.49
1.27
1.73
1.47
265.46
534.21
Giza 69 x Dand a
3.92
5.76
3.45
2.92
1.32
1.14
1.61
1.35
365.38
608.22
Giza 69 x Pima S6
3.79
5.85
3.34
2.8
1.29
1.1
1.53
1.28
349.51
617.74
Giza 69 x Aus aly
3.86
6.01
3.97
3.35
1.54
1.32
1.73
1.46
271.54
536.06
Giza 69 x 10229
3.34
5.14
3.87
3.23
1.48
1.25
1.6
1.46
291.63
564.34
LSD (0.05)
0.18
0.25
0.13
0.11
0.04
0.03
0.06
0.05
22.25
24.47
LSD (0.01)
0.24
0.33
0.18
0.14
0.05
0.04
0.08
0.07
29.55
32.50
ACTA AGRARIA DEBRECENIENSIS 2021-2
DOI: 10.34101/ACTAAGRAR/2/9194
13
Table 7. Mean alues o d ough ole ance indices in co on
Pa en s
Tol
M.P.
H.M.
S.S.I.
G.M.P
S.T.I.
Y.I.
Y.S.I
R.D.I
D.I.
L1- Giza 45
18.73
68.23
66.79
1.02
67.5
0.76
0.9
0.76
0.99
0.69
L2- Minu y
28.53
68.19
65.21
1.49
66.68
0.65
0.82
0.65
0.85
0.54
L3- Giza 67
11.35
84
83.61
0.55
83.8
0.87
1.19
0.87
1.14
1.04
L4- Giza 68
14.99
77.02
76.26
0.77
76.64
0.82
1.06
0.82
1.07
0.87
L5- Giza 86
19.15
67.03
65.66
1.08
66.35
0.75
0.88
0.75
0.98
0.66
L6- Giza 77
17.82
65.22
63.86
1.03
64.53
0.76
0.86
0.76
0.99
0.66
L7- Giza 94
11.53
78.34
77.91
0.59
78.13
0.86
1.11
0.86
1.12
0.96
L8- Giza 96
53.22
71.49
61.57
2.34
66.34
0.46
0.68
0.46
0.6
0.31
L9- Giza 69
15.83
67.36
66.33
0.92
66.84
0.79
0.91
0.79
1.03
0.72
T1- Dand a
13.59
59.4
58.6
0.89
59
0.79
0.8
0.79
1.03
0.64
T2- Pima S6
15.94
72.69
71.79
0.86
72.24
0.8
0.99
0.8
1.04
0.79
T3- Aus aly
15.47
62.89
61.92
0.93
62.41
0.78
0.84
0.78
1.02
0.66
T4- 10229
24.26
34.97
30.71
2.2
32.77
0.49
0.35
0.49
0.64
0.17
Giza 45 x Dand a
18.96
80.38
79.24
0.91
79.8
0.79
1.08
0.79
1.03
0.85
Giza 45 x Pima S6
11.82
83.51
83.09
0.57
83.3
0.87
1.18
0.87
1.13
1.03
Giza 45 x Aus aly
12.57
71.42
70.86
0.7
71.14
0.84
0.99
0.84
1.09
0.83
Giza 45 x 10229
18.57
64.73
63.14
1.05
63.92
0.76
0.85
0.76
0.98
0.64
Minu y x Dand a
20.16
77.99
76.53
0.97
77.26
0.77
1.04
0.77
1.01
0.81
Minu y x Pima S6
24.61
77.34
75.36
1.19
76.35
0.72
0.99
0.72
0.94
0.72
Minu y x Aus aly
56.2
87.57
78.23
2.08
82.74
0.52
0.91
0.52
0.67
0.47
Minu y x 10229
23.91
81.95
80.1
1.07
81.01
0.75
1.07
0.75
0.98
0.8
Giza 67 x Dand a
11.83
69.08
68.57
0.69
68.82
0.84
0.96
0.84
1.09
0.81
Giza 67 x Pima S6
17.42
74.15
73.06
0.9
73.6
0.79
1
0.79
1.03
0.79
Giza 67 x Aus aly
39.07
91.41
87.07
1.51
89.21
0.65
1.1
0.65
0.85
0.72
Giza 67 x 10229
12.95
73.05
72.45
0.71
72.75
0.84
1.02
0.84
1.09
0.85
Giza 68 x Dand a
24.2
81.78
79.98
1.11
80.87
0.74
1.06
0.74
0.97
0.79
Giza 68 x Pima S6
24.97
66.61
64.25
1.35
65.42
0.69
0.83
0.69
0.89
0.57
Giza 68 x Aus aly
32.01
72.04
68.48
1.57
70.24
0.64
0.85
0.64
0.83
0.54
Giza 68 x 10229
18.11
80.58
79.47
0.86
80.02
0.8
1.09
0.8
1.04
0.87
Giza 86 x Dand a
23.2
110.79
109.55
0.83
110.17
0.81
1.51
0.81
1.05
1.23
Giza 86 x Pima S6
26.69
70.91
68.26
1.37
69.57
0.68
0.88
0.68
0.89
0.61
Giza 86 x Aus aly
21.75
84.45
82.91
0.98
83.67
0.77
1.12
0.77
1.01
0.87
Giza 86 x 10229
19.51
73.61
72.27
1
72.93
0.77
0.97
0.77
1
0.75
Giza 77 x Dand a
12.25
79.69
79.2
0.61
79.44
0.86
1.12
0.86
1.12
0.96
Giza 77 x Pima S6
11.75
87.12
86.72
0.54
86.92
0.87
1.24
0.87
1.14
1.08
Giza 77 x Aus aly
20.07
78.38
76.94
0.97
77.66
0.77
1.04
0.77
1.01
0.81
Giza 77 x 10229
20.62
57.57
55.54
1.27
56.54
0.71
0.72
0.71
0.92
0.51
Giza 94 x Dand a
15.72
77.04
76.22
0.8
76.63
0.81
1.06
0.81
1.06
0.86
Giza 94 x Pima S6
13.26
72.02
71.4
0.72
71.71
0.83
1
0.83
1.08
0.83
Giza 94 x Aus aly
27.7
74.14
71.31
1.33
72.71
0.69
0.92
0.69
0.9
0.64
Giza 94 x 10229
19.02
77.6
76.37
0.92
76.98
0.79
1.04
0.79
1.02
0.81
Giza 96 x Dand a
40
93.83
89.55
1.52
91.66
0.65
1.13
0.65
0.84
0.73
Giza 96 x Pima S6
23.87
66.59
64.43
1.3
65.5
0.7
0.83
0.7
0.91
0.58
Giza 96 x Aus aly
32.16
72.04
68.41
1.57
70.2
0.64
0.85
0.64
0.83
0.54
Giza 96 x 10229
36.17
71.06
66.43
1.75
68.7
0.59
0.81
0.59
0.77
0.48
Giza 69 x Dand a
14.27
64.43
63.59
0.85
64.01
0.8
0.87
0.8
1.05
0.7
Giza 69 x Pima S6
15.26
87.52
86.83
0.68
87.18
0.84
1.22
0.84
1.1
1.02
Giza 69 x Aus aly
37.78
69.53
64.29
1.83
66.85
0.58
0.77
0.58
0.75
0.45
Giza 69 x 10229
16.26
66.17
65.14
0.92
65.65
0.79
0.89
0.79
1.02
0.69
LSD (0.05)
9.47
10.81
10.58
0.37
10.66
0.09
0.16
0.09
0.11
0.17