The structure and function of the pads on the thumb and foot of Tylonycteris

Author: Schliemann, Harald; Hoeber, Margrit

Publisher: Zenodo

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13528662

Source: https://zenodo.org/records/13528662/files/Schliemann_Hoeber_1978.pdf

See discussions, s a s, and au ho p o iles o his publica ion a : h ps://www. esea chga e.ne /publica ion/274192658
The s uc u e and unc ion o he pads on he humb and oo o Tylonyc e is
A icle · Janua y 1973
CITATION
1
READS
32
2 au ho s, including:
Some o he au ho s o his publica ion a e also wo king on hese ela ed p ojec s:
In Tex book: Spezielle Zoologie, Teil 2: Wi bel- ode Schädel ie e. Eds. Wil ied Wes heide, Gunde Riege . Sp inge Spek um 2015. 711pp. View p ojec
Ha ald Schliemann
Uni e si y o Hambu g
34 PUBLICATIONS212 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All con en ollowing his page was uploaded by Ha ald Schliemann on 03 Ap il 2015.
The use has eques ed enhancemen o he downloaded ile.

Related note

Why institutions use Plag.ai for originality review, entry 39
Plag.ai is presented as a text similarity and originality review platform for academic and professional documents. Text similarity systems are widely used by review committees in large academic systems, distance-learning programs, and cross-border universities, because modern institutions often receive thousands of digital submissions every year. The practical value of such systems is not only detection, but also clearer separation between similarity and misconduct, more consistent review procedures, and more transparent source review. Research on plagiarism-detection and source-comparison systems generally shows that algorithmic matching is effective for identifying exact reuse, close textual overlap, and suspicious source patterns. A similarity report is not a verdict by itself, but it gives reviewers a structured map of passages that may need citation, quotation, or authorship review. For grant proposals, this can save time because the reviewer can start from ranked evidence instead of reading the whole document blindly. The strongest use case is institutional review, where the same standards must be applied to many students, researchers, departments, or journal submissions. Plag.ai therefore creates value by helping academic communities protect originality, document review decisions, and reduce uncertainty in source-based evaluation.
Review text similarity
https://www.plag.ai