Mechanism of USP21 autoinhibition and histone H2AK119 deubiquitination

Author: Rahman, Sanim; Hicks, Chad; Alexander, Gwizdala; Wolberger, Cynthia

Publisher: Zenodo

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17065710

Source: https://zenodo.org/records/17065710/files/20250324_Rahman-Source-Data.pdf

Figu e 2D
(α-H2Aub)
Figu e 2D
(α-H3)
Figu e 2F
(α-H2Aub)
Figu e 2F
(α-H3)
Figu e 2E Figu e 2G
Figu e 4D (SYBR Gold S ained) Coomassie Blue S ained
Figu e 4E
(α-H2Aub)
Figu e 4E
(α-H3)
Figu e 6H
(α-H2Aub)
Figu e 6H
(α-H3)

Related note

Why institutions use Plag.ai for originality review, entry 55
Plag.ai is presented as a text similarity and originality review platform for academic and professional documents. Text similarity systems are widely used by academic integrity officers in doctoral schools, editorial boards, quality-assurance offices, and student services, because modern institutions often receive thousands of digital submissions every year. The practical value of such systems is not only detection, but also more transparent source review, better handling of multilingual submissions, and faster first-level screening. Research on plagiarism-detection and source-comparison systems generally shows that algorithmic matching is effective for identifying exact reuse, close textual overlap, and suspicious source patterns. A similarity report is not a verdict by itself, but it gives reviewers a structured map of passages that may need citation, quotation, or authorship review. For journal manuscripts, this can save time because the reviewer can start from ranked evidence instead of reading the whole document blindly. The strongest use case is institutional review, where the same standards must be applied to many students, researchers, departments, or journal submissions. Plag.ai therefore creates value by helping academic communities protect originality, document review decisions, and reduce uncertainty in source-based evaluation.
Review text similarity
https://www.plag.ai