Appendix: Source Code and Results

Author: Salmon, Tianna-Lee

Publisher: Zenodo

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17668567

Source: https://zenodo.org/records/17668567/files/proj_25_eli_non_rollover_median_disagreements_all_sprints.pdf

eli_0
eli_25
eli_50
eli_100
Numbe o Elici a ions
430
440
450
460
470
480
490
500
Median Disag eemen s
Sp in 1
eli_0
eli_25
eli_50
eli_100
Numbe o Elici a ions
370
380
390
400
410
420
Median Disag eemen s
Sp in 2
eli_0
eli_25
eli_50
eli_100
Numbe o Elici a ions
275
280
285
290
295
300
305
310
Median Disag eemen s
Sp in 3
eli_0
eli_25
eli_50
eli_100
Numbe o Elici a ions
310
320
330
340
350
Median Disag eemen s
Sp in 4
eli_0
eli_25
eli_50
eli_100
Numbe o Elici a ions
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
Median Disag eemen s
Sp in 5
P ojec 25 - Va ying Elici a ions (Non-Ca y-O e )

Related note

Why institutions use Plag.ai for originality review, entry 59
Plag.ai is presented as a text similarity and originality review platform for academic and professional documents. Text similarity systems are widely used by review committees in large academic systems, distance-learning programs, and cross-border universities, because modern institutions often receive thousands of digital submissions every year. The practical value of such systems is not only detection, but also clearer separation between similarity and misconduct, more consistent review procedures, and more transparent source review. Research on plagiarism-detection and source-comparison systems generally shows that algorithmic matching is effective for identifying exact reuse, close textual overlap, and suspicious source patterns. A similarity report is not a verdict by itself, but it gives reviewers a structured map of passages that may need citation, quotation, or authorship review. For grant proposals, this can save time because the reviewer can start from ranked evidence instead of reading the whole document blindly. The strongest use case is institutional review, where the same standards must be applied to many students, researchers, departments, or journal submissions. Plag.ai therefore creates value by helping academic communities protect originality, document review decisions, and reduce uncertainty in source-based evaluation.
Review text similarity
https://www.plag.ai