Copy igh © ISRG Publishe s. All igh s Rese ed.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17678277
40
ISRG PUBLISHERS
Abb e ia ed Key Ti le: ISRG J Edu Humani Li
ISSN: 2584-2544 (Online)
Jou nal homepage: h ps://is gpublishe s.com/is gjehl/
Volume – II Issue – VI (No embe -Decembe ) 2025
F equency: Bimon hly
Islamic Epis emology: The In eg a ion o Knowledge and Con empo a y Challenges
om an Islamic Schola ly Pe spec i e
A.M. Isma ulloh1*, Moh. Roqib2
1, 2 Pascasa jana Uni e si as Islam Nege i P o . K. H. Sai uddin Zuh i Pu woke o, Indonesia
| Recei ed: 13.11.2025 | Accep ed: 19.11.2025 | Published: 22.11.2025
*Co esponding au ho : A.M. Isma ulloh
Pascasa jana Uni e si as Islam Nege i P o . K. H. Sai uddin Zuh i Pu woke o, Indonesia
Abs ac
Islamic epis emology is con on ed wi h a ange o con empo a y challenges a ising om he secula iza ion o knowledge,
disciplina y agmen a ion, and he in ellec ual iden i y c isis wi hin Muslim socie ies. These issues s em om he dominance o a
secula Wes e n epis emological pa adigm ha sepa a es knowledge om di ine alues, esul ing in a dicho omy be ween
eligious sciences (ʿulūm al-dīn) and wo ldly sciences (ʿulūm al-dunyā). This s udy aims o e-examine he ounda ions o Islamic
epis emology g ounded in he p inciple o awḥīd and o e alua e he ele ance o A. Amin Abdullah‘s in eg a ion–in e connec ion
pa adigm as a me hodological esponse in con empo a y Islamic s udies. Employing a lib a y esea ch me hod, his s udy analyzes
classical and mode n sou ces—such as Al-A as, Nas , Al-Fa uqi, and Amin Abdullah—using con en analysis o iden i y epis emic
pa e ns and assess hei signi icance o p esen -day academic discou se. Findings e eal ha he secula iza ion o knowledge has
p oduced a c isis o alue and pu pose, as highligh ed by Al-A as and Nas , who a gue ha he loss o adab esul s in epis emic
con usion and mo al diso ien a ion. Addi ionally, he sha p di ide be ween Islamic sciences and empi ical disciplines has led o
epis emological agmen a ion, causing bo h eligious schola s and mode n scien is s o lose he essen ial connec ion be ween ex ,
eason, and socio-his o ical eali y. The s udy u he demons a es ha Amin Abdullah‘s in eg a ion–in e connec ion pa adigm
o e s a obus epis emological amewo k by syn hesizing he bayānī ( ex ual), bu hānī ( a ional), and ʿi ānī (spi i ual-in ui i e)
domains wi hin a dialogical and mul idisciplina y model. This pa adigm no only es o es he balanced ela ionship be ween
e ela ion, eason, and expe ience bu also enables he de elopmen o knowledge ha is socially ele an , e hically g ounded, and
spi i ually meaning ul. The s udy concludes ha econs uc ing Islamic epis emology
based on awḥīd and in e disciplina y
in eg a ion is an u gen agenda o add essing mode n in ellec ual challenges. Amin Abdullah‘s pa adigm p o es o be an
Copy igh © ISRG Publishe s. All igh s Rese ed.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17678277
41
1. INTRODUCTION
Knowledge occupies a highly cen al and undamen al posi ion
wi hin he s uc u e o Islamic epis emology. This asse ion is no
me ely no ma i e bu is g ounded in s ong heological
ounda ions. The mos p ima y e idence can be ound in he i s
e ela ion deli e ed o he P ophe Muhammad (peace be upon
him), he command ―Iq a‘‖ (Read) (Qu ‘an, Al-‗Alaq 96:1–5). In
i s b oade in e p e a ion, his command is no simply an
impe a i e o li e acy bu a philosophical call o ead, s udy, and
con empla e he en i e y o exis en ial eali y. This eali y is
di ided in o wo ca ego ies o di ine signs: aya qauliyyah ( e bal
signs con ained in he sac ed ex ) and aya kauniyyah (cosmic
signs mani es ed h oughou he uni e se). Bo h se e as in eg al
and complemen a y sou ces o knowledge. F om his pe spec i e,
Islamic epis emology ega ds knowledge as a di ine gi (ni‗ma
Allah) ha enables humans o ul ill hei mission o s ewa dship
(is ikhlā ) on ea h—namely, o manage and cul i a e li e (is i‗mā
al-a dh) wi h ull esponsibili y.
Syed Muhammad Naquib al-A as, one o he mos in luen ial
con empo a y Muslim hinke s, emphasizes he sanc i y o
knowledge by in insically linking i o he concep s o awḥīd ( he
oneness o God) and adab. Tawḥīd p o ides he on ological
amewo k ha all o ms o knowledge ul ima ely o igina e om
he One, he eby a i ming ha eali y is a cohe en uni y a he
han a collec ion o agmen ed domains. Meanwhile, adab si ua es
knowledge wi hin an axiological amewo k, in which he pu sui
and applica ion o knowledge mus be accompanied by e hical
alues, spi i ual awa eness, and he p ope ecogni ion o he
igh ul place o e e y hing in he o de o exis ence.
Consequen ly, knowledge in Islam is nei he neu al no alue- ee;
i unc ions as a means o d awing close o God ( aqa ub ilā
Allāh) and p omo ing uni e sal well-being (jalb al-maṣāliḥ).
Howe e , he de elopmen o mode n ci iliza ion—signi ican ly
shaped by pos -Enligh enmen Wes e n scien i ic pa adigms—has
led o a majo shi in epis emological o ien a ion. Knowledge has
unde gone a deep p ocess o secula iza ion, h ough which i has
been sepa a ed om anscenden al, mo al, and spi i ual alues.
Human eason and empi ical me hods ha e been ele a ed as he
sole legi ima e sou ces o u h (scien ism), while e ela ion and
me aphysics ha e been elega ed o he p i a e sphe e and deemed
i ele an o public schola ly discou se. The impac o his
secula iza ion has p oduced a sha p epis emological dicho omy
be ween ― eligious sciences‖ and ―secula sciences.‖
This dicho omy is no me ely concep ual bu has become
ins i u ionalized wi hin educa ional sys ems. On he one hand,
many Islamic highe educa ion ins i u ions s ill ely hea ily on
adi ional ex ual-no ma i e app oaches and o en lack
me hodological inno a ion o add ess con empo a y complexi ies,
esul ing in he isk o becoming isola ed om mode n
de elopmen s. On he o he hand, secula uni e si ies end o adop
educa ional models ha sepa a e science and echnology om
mo al and spi i ual conside a ions. As a consequence, Islamic
educa ion aces a c isis o schola ly iden i y mani es ed in wo
pola ized ou comes: eligious schola s who s uggle o engage wi h
eal-wo ld issues, and echnically p o icien scien is s who lack
spi i ual dep h and e hical esponsibili y. I le unadd essed, his
condi ion will unde mine he abili y o he Muslim communi y o
con ibu e meaning ully o global ci iliza ion.
Responding o hese dicho omous and secula challenges, A. Amin
Abdullah o e s an epis emological b eak h ough h ough his
pa adigm o in eg a ion-in e connec ion. This pa adigm p o ides a
me hodological amewo k aimed a b idging he gap be ween ex
( e ela ion and adi ion) and con ex (social, human, and
echnological eali ies. In con as o ea lie Islamiza ion-o -
knowledge app oaches ha end o be hie a chical and op-down,
Abdullah‘s model emphasizes a ―spide -web‖ con igu a ion in
which a ious ields— eligious sciences, social sciences and
humani ies, as well as na u al sciences and echnology—occupy
pa allel and mu ually in e ac i e posi ions wi hin a dialogical
ne wo k.
This app oach goes beyond e ical in eg a ion (subo dina ing
secula sciences unde eligious sciences) and ins ead p omo es
ho izon al in e connec ion h ough mul idisciplina y,
in e disciplina y, and e en ansdisciplina y engagemen . I
encou ages cons uc i e dialogue among he h ee epis emic
app oaches in Islamic in ellec ual adi ion: bayānī ( ex ual–
he meneu ical), bu hānī ( a ional–empi ical), and ‗i ānī
(in ui i e–spi i ual). Thus, he pa adigm no only econs uc s
Islamic epis emology o main ain con empo a y ele ance bu also
equips schola s and p ac i ione s wi h me hodological ools o
add ess mode n human p oblems—such as injus ice, ecological
c isis, and mo al decadence—in a holis ic, comp ehensi e, and
sus ainable manne .
Fo his eason, he p esen a icle seeks o explo e Islamic
epis emology mo e deeply by ocusing on A. Amin Abdullah‘s
in eg a ion–in e connec ion pa adigm as an analy ical esponse o
he p oblems o epis emological dicho omy and knowledge
secula iza ion. This s udy is expec ed o con ibu e o he
econs uc ion o an in eg a i e Islamic educa ion model capable o
p oducing schola s who a e in ellec ually excellen while i mly
g ounded in spi i uali y and e hics.
2. METHODOLOGY
This s udy employs a quali a i e app oach using lib a y esea ch as
i s p ima y me hod. Lib a y esea ch is conduc ed by examining
p ima y and seconda y sou ces ela ed o Islamic epis emology,
knowledge in eg a ion, and con empo a y scien i ic pa adigms.
This me hod is selec ed because he ocus o he s udy lies in
analyzing concep s, heo ies, and he pe spec i es o bo h classical
e ec i e epis emological b idge connec ing eligious sciences, he humani ies, and science– echnology, he eby o e ing a holis ic
ounda ion o highe educa ion cu icula. Thus, Islamic epis emology possesses he po en ial no only o espond o con empo a y
issues bu also o se e as an in ellec ual amewo k capable o os e ing a mo ally g ounded and scien i ically ad anced mode n
Islamic ci iliza ion.
Keywo ds:
Islamic Epis emology, In eg a ion o Knowledge, A. Amin Abdullah, Secula iza ion o Knowledge, Islamic Knowledge
T adi ion.
Copy igh © ISRG Publishe s. All igh s Rese ed.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17678277
42
and mode n Muslim schola s conce ning knowledge and
epis emology. Zed (2014) explains ha lib a y esea ch aims o
explo e ideas h ough ex s and schola ly wo ks sys ema ically in
o de o p oduce heo e ical syn hesis and new unde s andings.
The p ima y da a in his esea ch include o iginal wo ks o
in luen ial schola s such as al-Ghazālī (Iḥyā‘ ‗Ulūm al-Dīn), Syed
Muhammad Naquib al-A as (P olegomena o he Me aphysics o
Islam), Ismail Raji al-Fa uqi (Islamiza ion o Knowledge), and A.
Amin Abdullah (Pa adigma In eg asi-In e koneksi). Seconda y
da a a e ob ained om epu able jou nals, con e ence p oceedings,
and suppo ing books ele an o knowledge in eg a ion, he
secula iza ion o knowledge, and con empo a y epis emological
challenges. Sou ce selec ion ollows he p inciples o c edibili y,
ecency, and ele ance (C eswell, 2014).
Da a collec ion is conduc ed h ough documen a ion, which
in ol es iden i ying, acing, and o ganizing schola ly ex s om
a ious academic eposi o ies such as Google Schola ,
Resea chGa e, and digi al lib a ies o Islamic uni e si ies. The
collec ed da a a e hen analyzed using con en analysis. This
echnique ocuses on ca ego izing and in e p e ing ex ual
meanings o unco e pa e ns linking Islamic epis emology,
knowledge in eg a ion, and con empo a y challenges. Acco ding o
K ippendo (2013), con en analysis enables esea che s o e eal
hidden messages wi hin ex s and hei ele ance o social con ex s.
The analy ical p ocess consis s o h ee main s ages: (1) Da a
educ ion, which in ol es selec ing and simpli ying ele an
in o ma ion; (2) Da a p esen a ion, which o ganizes in o ma ion
in o a concep ual amewo k; (3) Conclusion d awing, which
o mula es concep ual conclusions ega ding he posi ion o
Islamic epis emology in add essing mode n challenges (Miles,
Hube man, & Saldaña, 2014). Thus, his me hod does no me ely
p esen da a bu also analyzes, c i iques, and syn hesizes heo ies o
p oduce cons uc i e and o iginal indings.
This esea ch is desc ip i e-analy ical in na u e, aiming o desc ibe
Islamic epis emology while p o iding a c i ical analysis o he
issues o knowledge dicho omy and secula iza ion. This app oach
aligns wi h he objec i e o he s udy, which is o explo e an in-
dep h unde s anding o knowledge in eg a ion wi hin he
amewo k o Islamic epis emology and i s ele ance in add essing
con empo a y ci iliza ional challenges.
3. DISCUSSION
The Na u e o Knowledge in Islam
In he Islamic pe spec i e, ‗ilm (knowledge) is no me ely a ional
in o ma ion bu encompasses spi i ual and mo al dimensions as
well. Te minologically, classical schola s de ine knowledge as
clea and ce ain unde s anding o some hing in acco dance wi h i s
ue eali y (al-Ghazālī, Iḥyā‘ ‗Ulūm al-Dīn). The Qu ‘an employs
he e m ‗ilm mo e han 750 imes, signi ying i s cen ali y wi hin
he s uc u e o Islamic eachings (al-A as, 1995). One o he
ea lies e ealed e ses commands eading and in oking he name
o God as he sou ce o all knowledge (Qu ‘an, 96:1–5). This
illus a es ha he Islamic concep ion o knowledge does no
in ol e sepa a ing he in ellec om God; a he , i is he
u iliza ion o he in ellec o comp ehend he signs o God. Thus,
knowledge in Islam possesses a anscenden al dimension, o i s
pinnacle lies in he ecogni ion o Allah as he ul ima e sou ce o
all knowledge (Qu ‘an, 2:31).
Fu he mo e, knowledge in Islam is no solely aimed a knowing
bu also a guiding humans owa d ecogni ion, se i ude, and
submission o Allah. The Qu ‘an a i ms, ―Indeed, among His
se an s, only hose who ha e knowledge uly ea Allah‖
(Qu ‘an, 35:28). This e se highligh s he e hical dimension o
knowledge: ue knowledge engende s khashyah (humili y and
spi i ual awa eness), a he han me e in ellec ual p es ige. Al-
A as explains ha he loss o adab in he pu sui o knowledge
leads o he co up ion o knowledge, occu ing when knowledge is
de ached om i s heocen ic o ien a ion and pu sued solely o
wo ldly gain (Islam and Secula ism, 1978). The e o e, he essence
o knowledge is no simply he accumula ion o in o ma ion bu a
p ocess o spi i ual pu i ica ion, mo al cul i a ion, and
s eng hening he human ela ionship wi h Allah.
In addi ion, Islamic schola ship encompasses wo majo ca ego ies:
(1) naqli knowledge ( e ealed knowledge) and (2) ‗aqli knowledge
( a ional/empi ical knowledge). A. Amin Abdullah (2003), h ough
his in eg a ion-in e connec ion pa adigm, asse s ha he
dicho omy be ween eligious and secula sciences is a colonial
legacy ha con adic s he Islamic epis emological amewo k. In
Islam, bo h o ms o knowledge mus be uni ied, o hey ep esen
di e en mani es a ions o he di ine signs: he aya qauliyyah ( he
Qu ‘an) and he aya kauniyyah ( he signs ound in he na u al
wo ld). Ibn Qayyim u he emphasizes ha eason is a p e equisi e
o mo al esponsibili y ( aklī ), ye i canno a ain ul ima e u h
wi hou he guidance o e ela ion (Mi āḥ Dā al-Sa‗ādah).
Wi hin his pa adigm, Islamic knowledge is in eg a i e—me ging
me aphysical, empi ical, and e hical dimensions. This in eg a i e
cha ac e is ic ep esen s a unique ea u e o Islamic epis emology
in con as o mode n Wes e n epis emology, which ends o be
secula and posi i is ic.
Func ions and Objec i es o Knowledge in he Islamic
Pe spec i e: A Comp ehensi e Re iew
In he Islamic wo ld iew, knowledge is no me ely a cogni i e ool
o unde s anding empi ical eali y; i also possesses a deepe
pu pose in insically connec ed o he e y goal o human c ea ion.
Al-A as (1995), in his wo k P olegomena o he Me aphysics o
Islam, asse s ha he p ima y unc ion o knowledge is o se e as
a means o know God (ma‗ i a ullah) and o disco e he igh ul
place (ḥaqq) o all hings wi hin he o de o exis ence. This
unc ion posi ions knowledge as nū (ligh ) ha pu i ies he hea
om he da kness o igno ance (jahl) and guides human beings
owa d ecognizing bo h God and hemsel es. Fu he mo e, Al-
Ghazali, in Iḥyā‘ ‗Ulūm al-Dīn (2000), dis inguishes be ween
p aisewo hy knowledge (al-‗ilm al-maḥmūd) and blamewo hy
knowledge (al-‗ilm al-madhmūm). P aisewo hy knowledge e e s
o bene icial knowledge (al-‗ilm al-nā i‗), namely knowledge ha
d aws indi iduals close o God, pu i ies he soul, and di ec s
e hical conduc . Thus, he unc ion o knowledge ex ends beyond
he me e accumula ion o in o ma ion; i se es as a means o
spi i ual and mo al ans o ma ion, leading human beings om a
s a e o jahl owa d ue islām (submission).
The objec i e o knowledge in he Islamic amewo k is essen ially
encapsula ed wi hin he concep s o khilā ah ( icege ency o God
on ea h) and ‗ibādah (wo ship). Acco ding o Rahman (1984) in
Islam and Mode ni y, he ul ima e pu pose o knowledge is o
enable humans o ul ill hei manda e as God‘s icege en s by
building a jus and sus ainable ci iliza ion while embodying o al
se i ude o Him alone. Knowledge, he e o e, mus be o ien ed
owa d achie ing maṣlaḥah (uni e sal goodness) and ealizing he
Copy igh © ISRG Publishe s. All igh s Rese ed.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17678277
43
maqāṣid al-sha ī‗ah ( he highe objec i es o Islamic law), which
include he p ese a ion o eligion, li e, in ellec , lineage, and
p ope y. Islamic epis emology ejec s he dicho omy be ween
eligious and wo ldly sciences because all o ms o knowledge—so
long as hey do no con adic he p inciple o awḥīd—cons i u e
God‘s signs (āyā ), whe he ex ual (qauliyyah) o cosmic
(kauniyyah), which lead o s eng hened ai h and igh eous ac ion.
As a i med in Qu ‘an 35:28, ―Only hose who ha e knowledge
among His se an s uly ea Allah.‖ This e se unde sco es he
causal ela ionship be ween ue knowledge and pie y, in which
knowledge becomes he ounda ion o an Islamic ci iliza ion ha
is digni ied, e hical, and bene icial o all o c ea ion ( aḥma an lil-
‗ālamīn).
Islamic Epis emology and he In eg a ion o Knowledge:
Cons uc ing a Holis ic In ellec ual Pa adigm
Islamic epis emology o e s a uniquely in eg a i e ounda ion o
cons uc ing a scien i ic pa adigm, ejec ing he dicho omy
be ween eligious sciences (naqliyah) and a ional o empi ical
sciences (‗aqliyah). Unlike mode n Wes e n epis emology—which
ends o be secula and sepa a es eligion om science—Islamic
epis emology uni es bo h domains wi hin he amewo k o awḥīd.
Acco ding o Syed Muhammad Naquib al-A as (1995), his
in eg a ion is possible because Islam iews all knowledge as
o igina ing om God, whe he e ealed h ough he Qu ‘an and he
Sunnah (āyā qauliyyah) o disco e ed h ough he obse a ion o
he na u al wo ld (āyā kauniyyah). Ismail Raji al-Fa uqi (1982),
h ough he concep o he Islamiza ion o knowledge, emphasizes
he need o econs uc mode n sciences by in eg a ing he
p inciples o awḥīd, ensu ing ha knowledge is no alue- ee bu
bound o Islamic e hical alues. This in eg a i e pe spec i e is
e lec ed in he golden age o Islamic ci iliza ion, when schola s
such as Ibn Sīnā and al-Bī ūnī saw no con lic be ween s udying
philosophy, medicine, and as onomy alongside Qu ‘anic sciences
and ju isp udence, as all b anches o knowledge we e unde s ood
as mani es a ions o a uni ied di ine u h.
The p ocess o in eg a ing knowledge wi hin Islamic epis emology
is no me ely a supe icial combina ion o eligious and secula
sciences; a he , i in ol es a p o ound on ological,
epis emological, and axiological uni ica ion. Osman Baka (1998),
in Classi ica ion o Knowledge in Islam, explains ha he hie a chy
o knowledge in Islam is g ounded in he p inciple o he uni y o
knowledge, whe e he naqliyah sciences occupy he highes le el
due o hei ce ain y (qaṭ‗ī) and unc ion as he ounda ional
amewo k o he ‗aqliyah sciences. This in eg a i e app oach
equi es e e y scien i ic discipline o ope a e wi hin he amewo k
o awḥīd and o be o ien ed owa d achie ing he maqāṣid al-
sha ī‗ah. In he con empo a y con ex , he g ea es challenge o
implemen ing his in eg a i e model is o e coming he legacy o
epis emological dicho omy inhe i ed om colonial educa ional
sys ems. Acco ding o Alpa slan Acikgenc (1996), he solu ion lies
in de eloping a cohe en ―Islamic scien i ic pa adigm,‖ capable o
o mula ing in eg a i e me hodologies o all ields o knowledge
while add essing mode n challenges wi hou comp omising Islamic
iden i y. Thus, Islamic epis emology no only o e s an al e na i e
o he secula iza ion o knowledge bu also p o ides he ounda ion
o building a holis ic, e hical, and digni ied in ellec ual
ci iliza ion.
Islamic Epis emology and I s Con ibu ion o he Building o
Ci iliza ion
Islamic epis emology plays a cen al ole in shaping he b illiance
o classical Islamic ci iliza ion. Unlike Wes e n epis emology,
which ends o be secula and sepa a es eligious knowledge om
he a ional and empi ical sciences, Islamic epis emology o e s an
in eg a i e pa adigm ha uni es e ela ion (naql) and eason (‗aql)
wi hin a cohe en in ellec ual amewo k. Acco ding o Osman
Baka (1998), his in eg a ion is e lec ed in a hie a chical
classi ica ion o knowledge in which he e ealed sciences occupy
he highes posi ion due o hei ce ain y (qaṭ‗ī), while a ional and
empi ical sciences unc ion as suppo ing ools o unde s anding
he eali y o he uni e se. This pa adigm os e ed he eme gence
o mul idisciplina y Muslim schola s such as Ibn Sīnā, who
mas e ed no only philosophy and medicine bu also Qu ‘anic
exegesis and ju isp udence. Thei con ibu ions o he ad ancemen
o a ious scien i ic disciplines— om ma hema ics, as onomy,
and medicine o chemis y—a e insepa able om an
epis emological wo ld iew ha ega ds he en i e cosmos as āyā
Allāh ha mus be s udied and explo ed (Baka , 1998). Thus,
Islamic epis emology became he d i ing o ce behind a
ci iliza ion ha p oduced monumen al scien i ic achie emen s.
The decline o his once- lou ishing ci iliza ion, oo ed in an
in eg a i e epis emological adi ion, began wi h he weakening o
he unde s anding o awḥīd in knowledge and he eme gence o a
dicho omy be ween eligious and secula sciences. Nas (1993), in
his wo k The Need o a Sac ed Science, explains ha he
secula iza ion o knowledge in he Muslim wo ld—la gely
in luenced by Wes e n in ellec ual colonialism—has up oo ed
knowledge om i s spi i ual and me aphysical ounda ions. As a
esul , knowledge has been s ipped o i s e hical g ounding and i s
ul ima e aims (maqāṣid al-sha ī‗ah), con ibu ing o he
mul idimensional c ises aced by con empo a y Muslim socie ies.
In esponse o hese challenges, he u gen agenda is o e i e
Islamic epis emology h ough a ele an and cons uc i e
econs uc ion. Ismail Raji al-Fa uqi (1982) p oposes he concep
o he ―Islamiza ion o knowledge‖ as an epis emological ini ia i e
o b eak ee om secula amewo ks and es o e knowledge o
he domain o awḥīd. This p ojec does no aim o ejec mode n
scien i ic p og ess bu o unde ake a p ocess o c i ical il a ion
and c ea i e in eg a ion, allowing mode n knowledge o be
ha monized wi h Islamic alues and wo ld iew in o de o build an
al e na i e ci iliza ion ha is humane, jus , and spi i ually
g ounded.
A. Amin Abdullah‘s In eg a ion–In e connec ion Pa adigm: An
Epis emological B idge in Con empo a y Islamic S udies
The in eg a ion–in e connec ion pa adigm p oposed by A. Amin
Abdullah ep esen s a sophis ica ed epis emological esponse o he
ailu e o dicho omous app oaches in con empo a y Islamic
s udies. Unlike he Islamiza ion o knowledge mo emen —which
ends o ope a e wi hin a hie a chical amewo k—Abdullah‘s
pa adigm in oduces a ―web model‖ ha emphasizes ecip ocal,
ho izon al, and dialogical ela ionships among a ious ields o
knowledge. In his book Islamic S udies di Pe gu uan Tinggi:
Pendeka an In eg a i -In e konek i (2006), Abdullah s esses ha
in eg a ion does no imply subo dina ing he na u al and social
sciences o he eligious sciences, bu a he cons uc ing an
equi able dialogue in which ex s (naql) and con ex s (‗aql),
e ela ion and social eali y, mu ually en ich each o he . D awing
om con empo a y philosophy o science—pa icula ly
he meneu ics and c i ical heo y— his pa adigm unc ions as an
epis emological b idge connec ing he classical Islamic in ellec ual
Copy igh © ISRG Publishe s. All igh s Rese ed.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17678277
44
adi ion wi h mode n de elopmen s in he humani ies and social
sciences. Consequen ly, he in eg a ion–in e connec ion pa adigm
seeks o o e come he agmen a ion o he h ee majo epis emic
domains o en sepa a ed in Islamic schola ship: bayānī ( ex ual),
bu hānī ( a ional), and ‗i ānī (in ui i e).
Fu he mo e, he implemen a ion o his pa adigm equi es a
mul idisciplina y app oach ha o ganically links di e se ields o
s udy. Abdullah (2012), in Religion, Science, and Cul u e: An
In eg a ed, In e connec ed Pa adigm o Science, asse s ha his
pa adigm is no only ele an o Islamic s udies bu also o he
b oade de elopmen o scien i ic knowledge. Th ough he concep
o ―epis emological iangula ion‖—which combines he bayānī
app oach o ex ual analysis, he bu hānī app oach o c i ical
easoning, and he ‗i ānī app oach o spi i ual insigh — his
pa adigm o e s a comp ehensi e me hodological amewo k o
add essing he complexi ies o eali y. Wi hin highe educa ion, he
implemen a ion o his pa adigm equi es cu icula econs uc ion
ha connec s e hical– eligious alues wi h ad ancemen s in
science and echnology, while equipping s uden s wi h he capaci y
o ―epis emological ij ihād‖ in esponding o con empo a y issues.
Abdullah‘s pa adigm hus no only econs uc s Islamic
epis emology bu also opens a mo e inclusi e space o dialogue
be ween he Islamic in ellec ual he i age and mode n hough .
Con empo a y Challenges in Islamic Epis emology
One o he mos se ious challenges in con empo a y Islamic
schola ship is he secula iza ion o knowledge—namely, he
de achmen o knowledge om di ine and spi i ual alues.
Secula iza ion, adop ed om he mode n Wes e n pa adigm,
posi ions eason and empi icism as he sole alid sou ces o
knowledge (scien ism), he eby ende ing e ela ion i ele an in
he p ocess o knowledge p oduc ion (Nas , 1996). As a esul , a
dicho omy eme ges be ween eligious sciences (‗ulūm al-dīn) and
wo ldly sciences (‗ulūm al-dunyā), e en hough in Islam all
knowledge ul ima ely o igina es om Allah and se es he unc ion
o wo ship. Al-A as (1995) asse s ha secula iza ion has ―caused
con usion in knowledge‖ by s ipping i o adab and i s p ope
o ien a ion, which should guide humans owa d he ecogni ion o
God. Thus, secula iza ion shi s he pu pose o knowledge om
cul i a ing mo ally e ined human beings o me ely p oducing
echnology and ma e ial ad ancemen s de oid o spi i ual
o ien a ion.
A second challenge is he agmen a ion and o e specializa ion o
knowledge, which has esul ed in he loss o in e connec edness
among disciplines wi hin Islamic in ellec ual de elopmen . The
mode n educa ional model, wi h i s igidly disciplina y and
sec o al s uc u e, c ea es a disconnec ion be ween eligious
sciences and empi ical sciences. Amin Abdullah (2003) desc ibes
his condi ion as ―disciplina y egoism‖— he a ogance o each
discipline ha conside s i sel he sole bea e o u h and e uses
dialogue wi h o he s. This s ands in con as o he Islamic
epis emological p inciple o awḥīd and in eg a ion, in which
e ela ion, eason, expe ience, and in ui ion mus in e ac
ha moniously. Abdullah‘s p oposed solu ion is he In eg a ion–
In e connec ion pa adigm, an epis emic amewo k ha uni ies he
social sciences, humani ies, eligious sciences, and na u al sciences
wi hin a dialogical s uc u e—ensu ing ha knowledge is no only
logically alid bu also e hically and spi i ually meaning ul.
A hi d and equally p essing challenge is he c isis o schola ly
iden i y among Muslims, pa icula ly in highe educa ion
ins i u ions. Many Muslim s uden s mas e mode n science and
echnology ye lack a g ounding in e hical and spi i ual alues.
This is e iden in he phenomenon o mo al disengagemen —
knowledge ad ances, bu mo al esponsibili y does no (Al-Fa uqi,
1982). Con e sely, many eligious schola s possess mas e y o
sac ed ex s bu s uggle o engage wi h social, poli ical, and
echnological eali ies. Fa id Esack (2005) desc ibes his
phenomenon as a up u e be ween ex and con ex : in e p e a ion
wi hou eali y, o eali y wi hou e ela ion. Epis emological
in eg a ion is he e o e necessa y so ha eligious schola s de elop
scien i ic li e acy and scien is s de elop spi i ual li e acy, c ea ing
a gene a ion o e hical schola s capable o add essing
con empo a y challenges.
Thus, con empo a y challenges in Islamic epis emology a e no
me ely me hodological bu also on ological and axiological. The
Muslim wo ld mus econs uc i s epis emology in a way ha
es o es knowledge o i s p ima y unc ion: achie ing human
lou ishing (maṣlaḥah) and b inging people close o Allah.
Wi hou such econs uc ion, Muslims will con inue o be
consume s o Wes e n knowledge wi hou becoming digni ied
p oduce s o knowledge. Fo his eason, he in eg a ion o
knowledge h ough he pa adigms o awḥīd and In eg a ion–
In e connec ion cons i u es an u gen epis emological agenda o
ebuilding Islamic ci iliza ion.
4. CONCLUSION
Based on he discussions p esen ed, i can be concluded ha
Islamic epis emology o e s a holis ic and in eg a i e scien i ic
pa adigm, undamen ally di e en om he secula and agmen ed
epis emology o he Wes . Islamic epis emology is g ounded in he
p inciple o awhid, which iews all o ms o knowledge—whe he
naqli ( e ealed) o aqli ( a ional-empi ical)—as o igina ing om
Allah SWT. Knowledge in Islam is no me ely a cogni i e p oduc ;
i possesses a anscenden al dimension ha se es as a means o
knowing Allah (ma' i a ullah), pu i ying he hea om igno ance,
and es ablishing a digni ied and jus ci iliza ion ( ahma an lil-
‗alamin).
Con empo a y challenges such as he secula iza ion o knowledge,
he dicho omy o sciences, and he c isis o in ellec ual iden i y
demand an epis emological esponse ha is ele an and
subs an ial. The pa adigm o in eg a ion–in e connec ion p oposed
by A. Amin Abdullah o e s a me hodological solu ion by
ha monizing he bayani ( ex ual), bu hani ( a ional), and i ani
(spi i ual) app oaches wi hin a mul idisciplina y amewo k. The
implemen a ion o his pa adigm in highe educa ion—pa icula ly
h ough he econs uc ion o an in eg a i e cu iculum—becomes
a s a egic agenda o p oduce schola s who mas e hei disciplines
while also possessing s ong spi i ual and e hical ounda ions.
Thus, he econs uc ion o Islamic epis emology does no only
add ess con empo a y in ellec ual challenges bu also se es as a
ounda ion o he e i al o a mode n Islamic ci iliza ion capable
o uni ing scien i ic excellence wi h mo al in eg i y.
5. REFERENCES
1. Abdullah, A. (2003). Islamic s udies dalam pa adigma
in eg asi-in e koneksi. Yogyaka a: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
2. Abdullah, A. (2006). Islamic s udies di pe gu uan inggi:
Pendeka an in eg a i -in e konek i . Yogyaka a: Pus aka
Pelaja .
Copy igh © ISRG Publishe s. All igh s Rese ed.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17678277
45
3. Abdullah, A. (2019). Mul idisiplin, in e disiplin, dan
ansdisiplin: Me ode s udi agama dan s udi Islam di e a
kon empo e . Yogyaka a: UIN Sunan Kalijaga P ess.
4. Abdullah, A. A. (2012). Religion, science, and cul u e:
An in eg a ed, in e connec ed pa adigm o science. Al-
Jami‘ah: Jou nal o Islamic S udies, 50(1), 1–25.
5. Acikgenc, A. (1996). Islamic science: Towa ds a
de ini ion. Kuala Lumpu : ISTAC.
6. Al-A as, S. M. N. (1995). P olegomena o he
me aphysics o Islam. Kuala Lumpu : ISTAC.
7. Al-Fa uqi, I. R. (1982). Islamiza ion o knowledge:
Gene al p inciples and wo kplan. He ndon: IIIT.
8. Al-Ghazālī. (1980). Iḥyā‘ ‗ulūm al-dīn. Bei u : Dā al-
Fik .
9. Baka , O. (1998). Classi ica ion o knowledge in Islam.
Kuala Lumpu : ISTAC.
10. C eswell, J. W. (2014). Resea ch design: Quali a i e,
quan i a i e, and mixed me hods app oaches. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Esack, F. (2005). The Qu ‘an: A sho in oduc ion.
Ox o d: Onewo ld.
12. Hoodbhoy, P. (1991). Islam and science: Religious
o hodoxy and he ba le o a ionali y. London: Zed
Books.
13. Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyyah. (1998). Mi āḥ dā al-sa‗ādah.
Kai o: Dā al-Hadī h.
14. K ippendo , K. (2013). Con en analysis: An
in oduc ion o i s me hodology. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
15. Miles, M. B., Hube man, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014).
Quali a i e da a analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Nas , S. H. (1993). The need o a sac ed science.
Albany, NY: S a e Uni e si y o New Yo k P ess.
17. Nas , S. H. (1996). Religion and he o de o na u e.
New Yo k: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess.
18. Rahman, F. (1984). Islam and mode ni y:
T ans o ma ion o an in ellec ual adi ion. Chicago:
Uni e si y o Chicago P ess.
19. Zed, M. (2014). Me ode peneli ian kepus akaan. Jaka a:
Yayasan Obo Indonesia.
