INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
ISSN (p in ) 2833-2172, ISSN (online) 2833-2180
Volume 04 Issue 11 No embe 2025
DOI: 10.58806/ijsshm .2025 4i11n14, Impac Fac o : 6.79
Page No. 2159-2165
IJSSHMR, Volume 04 Issue 11 No embe 2025 www.ijsshm .com Page 2159
Un a eling he Nexus o Collec i e Collabo a ion and Ne wo king in SMEs:
Analysing Collec i e Ac ion o Weal h C ea ion in Nige ia
D Obinwanne kelechukwu A uomah1, Ogochukwu La y, Acha a PhD2, Ukonu Chosen-Tochi3, Roseline
Chinasa Agba ae oh PhD4
1Depa men o Accoun ancy Abia S a e Uni e si y, U u u
2Depa men o Managemen Abia S a e Uni e si y, U u u
3Depa men o Ma ke ing Abia S a e Uni e si y, U u u
4Depa men o Accoun ing Abia S a e Uni e si y, U u u
ABSTRACT: Small and Medium En e p ises (SMEs) a e pi o al o economic de elopmen , pa icula ly in de eloping coun ies
like Nige ia. This s udy explo es he ela ionship be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion wi hin Nige ian
SMEs. Using a quan i a i e esea ch design, da a we e collec ed om 300 SMEs ac oss a ious sec o s in Nige ia. The s udy
employed s uc u ed ques ionnai es o ga he da a on collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king ac i i ies, and weal h c ea ion me ics.
Da a analysis was conduc ed using desc ip i e s a is ics, co ela ion analysis, and mul iple eg ession analysis. The indings e eal
a signi ican posi i e ela ionship be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion in SMEs. The s udy concludes
ha os e ing collec i e ac ion and obus ne wo king can enhance weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs, he eby con ibu ing o
economic g ow h and de elopmen .
KEYWORDS: Collec i e Collabo a ion, Ne wo king, SMEs, Weal h C ea ion, Nige ia
INTRODUCTION
Small and Medium En e p ises (SMEs) a e widely ecognized as he backbone o economic de elopmen , pa icula ly in de eloping
coun ies. In Nige ia, SMEs con ibu e o e 48% o na ional GDP and accoun o 84% o employmen , se ing as i al engines o
po e y alle ia ion and weal h c ea ion (A iyo, 2005; OECD, 2020). Howe e , hese en e p ises ace sys emic challenges, including
limi ed access o inance, wi h only 15% o Nige ian SMEs secu ing o mal c edi (Wo ld Bank, 2020), alongside inadequa e
in as uc u e and weak ins i u ional amewo ks (Oyela an-Oyeyinka, 2010). Such cons ain s s i le p oduc i i y and inno a ion,
pe pe ua ing cycles o in o mali y and s agna ion (OECD, 2020).
To mi iga e hese ba ie s, collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king ha e eme ged as ans o ma i e s a egies. Collec i e
collabo a ion—de ined as join e o s among SMEs o achie e sha ed objec i es—enables esou ce pooling, isk-sha ing, and
economies o scale (Po e , 1998). Fo ins ance, indus ial clus e s in Nige ia’s ag icul u al and manu ac u ing sec o s ha e enhanced
SMEs’ access o bulk aw ma e ials, sha ed logis ics, and collabo a i e ma ke ing, educing cos s by up o 30% (Oyela an-Oyeyinka,
2010). Simila ly, ne wo king, which in ol es building ela ionships o esou ce and knowledge exchange, os e s social capi al
c i ical o SME esilience (Adle & Kwon, 2002). G ano e e ’s (1985) seminal wo k on embeddedness unde sco es how s ong
in e - i m ne wo ks acili a e us and ecip oci y, enabling SMEs o na iga e ola ile ma ke s. Empi ical s udies in Nige ia e eal
ha SMEs engaged in ade associa ions o digi al pla o ms (e.g., social media g oups) exhibi 25% highe e enue g ow h due o
imp o ed access o ma ke in elligence and inancing (Opu e e al., 2021; GSMA, 2022).
The syne gy be ween collabo a ion and ne wo king is pi o al. Fo example, coope a i e socie ies in Lagos’ ech sec o ha e
le e aged pa ne ships wi h incuba o s and global pla o ms like Google Hus le Academy o secu e aining and en u e capi al
(GSMA, 2022). Such ecosys ems align wi h Po e ’s (1998) clus e heo y, which posi s ha geog aphic concen a ions o
in e connec ed i ms d i e egional compe i i eness. Fu he mo e, ins i u ional suppo emains c ucial: he OECD (2020) ad oca es
o policies incen i izing SME alliances, such as ax b eaks o clus e pa icipan s and g an s o digi al in as uc u e. By
p io i izing hese s a egies, Nige ian SMEs can anscend s uc u al limi a ions, ca alyzing inclusi e economic ans o ma ion.
S a emen o he P oblem
Small and Medium En e p ises (SMEs) a e pi o al d i e s o economic g ow h in Nige ia, con ibu ing 48% o GDP and 84% o
na ional employmen (A iyo, 2005; OECD, 2020). Despi e hei c i ical ole, Nige ian SMEs ace sys emic ba ie s, including
Un a eling he Nexus o Collec i e Collabo a ion and Ne wo king in SMEs: Analysing Collec i e Ac ion o
Weal h C ea ion in Nige ia
IJSSHMR, Volume 04 Issue 11 No embe 2025 www.ijsshm .com Page 2160
limi ed access o o mal c edi —only 15% secu e loans (Wo ld Bank, 2020)—coupled wi h in as uc u al de ici s and weak
ins i u ional amewo ks (Oyela an-Oyeyinka, 2010). These challenges s i le p oduc i i y, inno a ion, and scalabili y, pe pe ua ing
cycles o in o mali y and hinde ing weal h c ea ion. While collec i e collabo a ion (e.g., join en u es, indus ial clus e s) and
s a egic ne wo king (e.g., ade associa ions, digi al pla o ms) a e ecognized as mechanisms o mi iga e such cons ain s (Po e ,
1998; G ano e e , 1985), hei syne gis ic impac on weal h c ea ion emains unde explo ed in he Nige ian con ex .
Exis ing s udies emphasize collabo a ion and ne wo king indi idually, o en in de eloped economies, bu ail o add ess how hese
s a egies in e ac in esou ce-cons ained en i onmen s like Nige ia. Fo ins ance, while clus e s educe ope a ional cos s
(Oyela an-Oyeyinka, 2010), and digi al ne wo ks enhance ma ke access (GSMA, 2022), he combined e ec o hese app oaches
on SME g ow h is unclea . This gap lea es policymake s and en ep eneu s wi hou e idence-based amewo ks o op imize hese
s a egies. Consequen ly, SMEs con inue o ope a e subop imally, unde mining hei po en ial o alle ia e po e y and s imula e
economic di e si ica ion.
This s udy add esses his gap by in es iga ing he nexus be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion in
Nige ian SMEs. By quan i ying hei indi idual and combined impac s, he esea ch p o ides ac ionable insigh s o e ine policies
and p ac ices, enabling SMEs o anscend s uc u al limi a ions and ca alyze inclusi e economic ans o ma ion.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
This s udy aims o un a el he nexus be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs.
Speci ically, he s udy seeks o:
Resea ch Objec i es
1. examine he ex en o which collec i e collabo a ion in luences weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs.
2. analyze he impac o ne wo king on weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs.
3. explo e he combined e ec o collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king on weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs.
Resea ch Ques ions
RQ1: To wha ex en does collec i e collabo a ion in luence weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs?
RQ2: How does ne wo king impac weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs?
RQ3: Wha is he combined e ec o collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king on weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs?
Resea ch Hypo heses
H₁: Collec i e collabo a ion has a signi ican e ec on weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs.
H₂: Ne wo king has a signi ican impac on weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs.
H₃: The combined e ec o collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king exe s a s onge in luence on weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs
han hei indi idual e ec s.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Collec i e Collabo a ion in SMEs
Collec i e collabo a ion e e s o he s a egic alliance o SMEs pooling esou ces, knowledge, and e o s o achie e sha ed
objec i es, such as inno a ion, ma ke expansion, o cos educ ion (Po e , 1998). Roo ed in heo ies like he esou ce-based iew
(Ba ney, 1991) and ansac ion cos economics (Williamson, 1985), collabo a ion allows SMEs o o e come esou ce sca ci y by
le e aging collec i e s eng hs. Po e ’s (1998) clus e heo y emphasizes geog aphic p oximi y as a ca alys o collabo a ion,
os e ing compe i i e ad an age h ough sha ed in as uc u e and knowledge spillo e s. Simila ly, Os om’s (1990) p inciples o
collec i e ac ion highligh he ole o us and ecip oci y in sus aining collabo a i e e o s, pa icula ly in esou ce-cons ained
en i onmen s.
Bene i s include isk-sha ing, economies o scale, and enhanced inno a ion (Po e , 1998). Fo ins ance, Nige ian ech s a ups in
he “Yabacon Valley” clus e collabo a e on so wa e de elopmen , educing indi idual R&D expendi u es by 25% (GSMA, 2022).
Howe e , challenges pe sis . Masu el and Janszen (2018) iden i ied coo dina ion cos s and ee- ide p oblems in Du ch SME
alliances, whe e smalle i ms con ibu ed less bu eaped equal bene i s. In Nige ia, in as uc u al de ici s, such as un eliable
elec ici y, hinde clus e e ec i eness (Wo ld Bank, 2020). Cul u al ac o s, like dis us s emming om pas con ac ual b eaches,
u he impede collabo a ion (Adebayo & Oluwa obi, 2021).
Ne wo king in SMEs
Ne wo king in ol es building and main aining ela ionships wi h s akeholde s o access esou ces, in o ma ion, and oppo uni ies
(Johanson & Vahlne, 2009). G ano e e ’s (1973) “s eng h o weak ies” heo y posi s ha loose connec ions (e.g., indus y
acquain ances) p o ide no el in o ma ion, while s ong ies (e.g., amily) o e emo ional suppo . Social capi al heo y (Adle &
Un a eling he Nexus o Collec i e Collabo a ion and Ne wo king in SMEs: Analysing Collec i e Ac ion o
Weal h C ea ion in Nige ia
IJSSHMR, Volume 04 Issue 11 No embe 2025 www.ijsshm .com Page 2161
Kwon, 2002) u he dis inguishes bonding capi al (in e nal ne wo ks) om b idging capi al (ex e nal ne wo ks), bo h c i ical o
SME esilience.
Ne wo king enhances ma ke in elligence, esou ce access, and legi imacy (Johanson & Vahlne, 2009). Fo example, Nige ian SMEs
pa icipa ing in he Lagos Chambe o Comme ce gained p e e en ial access o go e nmen con ac s (Oyela an-Oyeyinka, 2010).
Digi al pla o ms like Wha sApp Business ha e enabled mic o-SMEs o connec wi h supplie s, educing p ocu emen lead imes
by 30% (GSMA, 2022). Howe e , ne wo king demands signi ican ime and inancial in es men s. Adebayo (2022) ound ha
Nige ian SMEs spend 15% o hei annual budge s on ne wo king e en s, o en yielding ma ginal e u ns. Cul u al ba ie s, such as
hie a chical business p ac ices, also limi c oss-indus y collabo a ions (Madichie & Nkamnebe, 2020).
Weal h C ea ion in SMEs
Weal h c ea ion in SMEs encompasses income gene a ion, employmen , and asse accumula ion, con ibu ing o mac oeconomic
g ow h (Aud e sch & Thu ik, 2001). Schumpe e ’s (1934) heo y o inno a ion posi s ha weal h s ems om en ep eneu ial
en u es in oducing new p oduc s o p ocesses. Simila ly, he ins i u ional heo y (No h, 1990) emphasizes he ole o suppo i e
policies in enabling weal h c ea ion.
Collabo a ion and ne wo king syne gis ically enhance weal h c ea ion. Fo ins ance, Nige ian ag i-SMEs in clus e s using
coope a i e ma ke ing s a egies epo ed 35% highe incomes (Oyela an-Oyeyinka, 2010). Simila ly, SMEs in he Nnewi au o
clus e educed p oduc ion cos s by 25% h ough sha ed logis ics, ein es ing sa ings in o wo k o ce expansion (Adebayo, 2022).
Ne wo king wi h in ech pla o ms like Flu e wa e enabled 40% o Lagos SMEs o access mic oloans, boos ing capi al liquidi y
(Opu e e al., 2021).
Empi ical E idence
Globally, s udies unde sco e he e icacy o collabo a i e models. Noo eboom (1999) ound ha Du ch SMEs engaged in join
en u es epo ed 22% highe inno a ion a es due o sha ed R&D cos s. Schmi z’s (1995) analysis o B azilian oo wea clus e s
e ealed a 15% p oduc i i y su ge om collabo a i e supply chain managemen . In A ica, Zengeni and Zengeni (2020) no ed ha
Tanzanian ag icul u al coope a i es imp o ed ma ke access by 40%, educing pos -ha es losses. Howe e , in Nige ia, Oyela an-
Oyeyinka (2010) obse ed ha indus ial clus e s in Lagos educed ope a ional cos s by 30% h ough bulk p ocu emen , ye aced
challenges like unequal powe dynamics, whe e la ge i ms domina ed decision-making.
Che y and Holm (2000) demons a ed ha New Zealand SMEs wi h in e na ional ne wo ks achie ed 35% as e expo g ow h. In
Nige ia, Opu e e al. (2021) ound SMEs using social media o B2B engagemen epo ed 25% highe e enue due o b oade
ma ke each. Con e sely, Co iello and Mun o (1997) highligh ed ha so wa e SMEs elied on in o mal ne wo ks o alen
acquisi ion, educing ec ui men cos s by 20%. Howe e , Nige ian SMEs ace unique challenges: A s udy by Madichie and
Nkamnebe (2020) e ealed ha 60% o Lagos-based SMEs s uggled o ne wo k wi h inancial ins i u ions due o s ingen colla e al
equi emen s.
Beck and Demi güç-Kun (2006) iden i ied access o inance as he p ima y weal h d i e , wi h SMEs secu ing loans exhibi ing
20% highe g ow h a es. In Nige ia, SMEs le e aging mobile money pla o ms inc eased p o i ma gins by 18% due o s eamlined
ansac ions (GSMA, 2022). Howe e , inno a ion’s ole is unde explo ed: Akinwale e al. (2019) ound ha only 12% o Nige ian
SMEs in es in R&D, limi ing hei compe i i e edge. Ins i u ional suppo also a ies; while SMEDAN p o ides aining p og ams,
only 8% o u al SMEs access hese se ices (Wo ld Bank, 2020).
THEORETICAL REVIEW
The s udy is ancho ed in h ee in e ela ed heo e ical amewo ks: Po e ’s Clus e Theo y, G ano e e ’s Embeddedness Theo y,
and Social Capi al Theo y. Po e ’s (1998) clus e heo y posi s ha geog aphic concen a ions o in e connec ed i ms, supplie s,
and ins i u ions enhance compe i i eness h ough sha ed esou ces, knowledge spillo e s, and collabo a i e inno a ion. This heo y
unde pins he ole o collec i e collabo a ion, as clus e s enable SMEs o pool esou ces (e.g., join logis ics) and educe ansac ion
cos s, aligning wi h he s udy’s ocus on collabo a i e s a egies (Po e , 1998).
G ano e e ’s (1985) embeddedness heo y emphasizes ha economic ac ions a e deeply oo ed in social ne wo ks, whe e us and
ecip oci y go e n ela ionships. This amewo k explains how ne wo king ac i i ies—such as alliances wi h ade associa ions o
digi al pla o ms— os e social capi al, enabling SMEs o access c i ical esou ces (e.g., ma ke in elligence, inancing) and mi iga e
isks in ola ile ma ke s (G ano e e , 1985).
Social Capi al Theo y (Adle & Kwon, 2002) complemen s hese pe spec i es by dis inguishing be ween bonding capi al (in e nal
cohesion) and b idging capi al (ex e nal linkages). Bonding capi al acili a es collec i e collabo a ion (e.g., coope a i e socie ies),
while b idging capi al enhances ne wo king (e.g., c oss-indus y pa ne ships), bo h o which d i e weal h c ea ion h ough
imp o ed e iciency and ma ke access (Adle & Kwon, 2002).
Addi ionally, Schumpe e ’s Inno a ion Theo y (1934) and Ins i u ional Theo y (No h, 1990) con ex ualize weal h c ea ion.
Schumpe e highligh s inno a ion as a weal h d i e , achie able h ough collabo a i e R&D, while No h unde sco es he ole o
Un a eling he Nexus o Collec i e Collabo a ion and Ne wo king in SMEs: Analysing Collec i e Ac ion o
Weal h C ea ion in Nige ia
IJSSHMR, Volume 04 Issue 11 No embe 2025 www.ijsshm .com Page 2162
ins i u ional amewo ks (e.g., SMEDAN policies) in enabling SME g ow h. Toge he , hese heo ies p o ide a obus lens o analyze
how collabo a ion and ne wo king syne gize o o e come s uc u al ba ie s and os e weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs.
Gaps in Li e a u e
Mos s udies ocus on de eloped economies, neglec ing con ex ual ba ie s in de eloping na ions. Fo example, while Schmi z
(1995) emphasizes clus e e iciency, he o e looks ins i u ional oids in Nige ia, such as weak legal amewo ks o en o cing
collabo a ion ag eemen s (OECD, 2020). Addi ionally, ew s udies explo e digi al collabo a ion ools, such as i ual clus e s, which
could mi iga e geog aphic limi a ions (Zengeni & Zengeni, 2020).
Also, exis ing esea ch p edominan ly examines o mal ne wo ks (e.g., ade associa ions), neglec ing in o mal ne wo ks (e.g.,
kinship ies), which a e pi o al in Nige ia’s collec i is cul u e (Adebayo, 2022). Addi ionally, while Co iello and Mun o (1997)
ocus on high- ech sec o s, low- ech SMEs in ag icul u e emain unde s udied.
Fu he mo e, while Aud e sch and Thu ik (2001) link weal h o inno a ion, hey o e look con ex ual ba ie s like Nige ia’s e a ic
powe supply, which s i les p oduc ion (Akinwale e al., 2019). Addi ionally, mos s udies ea collabo a ion and ne wo king as
independen a iables, neglec ing hei in e ac ion. Fo example, how do digi al ne wo ks complemen physical clus e s? This gap
limi s policymake s’ abili y o design in eg a ed suppo amewo ks.
The li e a u e unde sco es he indi idual me i s o collabo a ion and ne wo king bu ails o add ess hei combined e icacy in
esou ce-sca ce se ings. Nige ia’s unique ins i u ional and cul u al landscape necessi a es ailo ed s a egies. By examining how
collabo a ion and ne wo king join ly d i e weal h c ea ion, his s udy b idges a c i ical gap, o e ing ac ionable insigh s o SME
s akeholde s.
METHODOLOGY
Resea ch Design
This s udy adop s a quan i a i e esea ch design o examine he ela ionship be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and
weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs. The quan i a i e app oach was chosen because i allows o he sys ema ic collec ion and analysis
o nume ical da a, enabling he iden i ica ion o pa e ns and ela ionships among a iables (C eswell, 2014).
Popula ion and Sample
The popula ion o his s udy consis s o SMEs ope a ing in a ious sec o s in Nige ia, including manu ac u ing, se ices, and ade.
The sample was d awn om SMEs egis e ed wi h he Small and Medium En e p ises De elopmen Agency o Nige ia (SMEDAN).
A o al o 300 SMEs we e selec ed using a s a i ied andom sampling echnique o ensu e ep esen a ion ac oss di e en sec o s
and egions.
Da a Collec ion
Da a we e collec ed using s uc u ed ques ionnai es adminis e ed o he owne s o manage s o he selec ed SMEs. The ques ionnai e
was di ided in o h ee sec ions: Sec ion A collec ed demog aphic in o ma ion, Sec ion B measu ed collec i e collabo a ion and
ne wo king, and Sec ion C assessed weal h c ea ion. The ques ionnai e was p e- es ed on a sample o 30 SMEs o ensu e i s
eliabili y and alidi y.
Da a Analysis
Da a analysis was conduc ed using desc ip i e s a is ics, co ela ion analysis, and mul iple eg ession analysis. Desc ip i e s a is ics
we e used o summa ize he demog aphic cha ac e is ics o he esponden s and he key a iables. Co ela ion analysis was
employed o examine he ela ionships be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion. Mul iple eg ession
analysis was used o assess he combined e ec o collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king on weal h c ea ion.
RESULTS
Desc ip i e S a is ics
The demog aphic cha ac e is ics o he esponden s a e p esen ed in Table 1. The majo i y o he esponden s we e male (65%),
aged be ween 30 and 50 yea s (70%), and had a e ia y educa ion (80%). The SMEs we e p edominan ly in he se ices sec o
(45%), ollowed by manu ac u ing (35%) and ade (20%).
Table 1: Demog aphic Cha ac e is ics o Responden s
Va iable
Ca ego y
F equency
Pe cen age
Gende
Male
195
65%
Female
105
35%
Age
20-30 yea s
45
15%
30-50 yea s
210
70%
Un a eling he Nexus o Collec i e Collabo a ion and Ne wo king in SMEs: Analysing Collec i e Ac ion o
Weal h C ea ion in Nige ia
IJSSHMR, Volume 04 Issue 11 No embe 2025 www.ijsshm .com Page 2163
Va iable
Ca ego y
F equency
Pe cen age
Abo e 50 yea s
45
15%
Educa ion
Seconda y
60
20%
Te ia y
240
80%
Sec o
Manu ac u ing
105
35%
Se ices
135
45%
T ade
60
20%
Sou ce: Field Su ey, 2025
Co ela ion Analysis
The esul s o he co ela ion analysis a e p esen ed in Table 2. The analysis e eals a signi ican posi i e ela ionship be ween
collec i e collabo a ion and weal h c ea ion ( = 0.65, p < 0.01), indica ing ha SMEs ha engage in collec i e collabo a ion a e
mo e likely o achie e highe le els o weal h c ea ion. Simila ly, he e is a signi ican posi i e ela ionship be ween ne wo king
and weal h c ea ion ( = 0.72, p < 0.01), sugges ing ha SMEs wi h obus ne wo king ac i i ies a e mo e likely o gene a e highe
le els o weal h.
Table 2: Co ela ion Analysis
Va iable
Collec i e Collabo a ion
Ne wo king
Weal h C ea ion
Collec i e Collabo a ion
1.00
0.58**
0.65**
Ne wo king
0.58**
1.00
0.72**
Weal h C ea ion
0.65**
0.72**
1.00
**No e: ** p < 0.01
Mul iple Reg ession Analysis
The esul s o he mul iple eg ession analysis a e p esen ed in Table 3. The analysis e eals ha bo h collec i e collabo a ion (β =
0.45, p < 0.01) and ne wo king (β = 0.52, p < 0.01) ha e a signi ican posi i e impac on weal h c ea ion. The combined e ec o
collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king explains 62% o he a iance in weal h c ea ion (R² = 0.62), indica ing ha hese wo
a iables a e c i ical de e minan s o weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs.
Table 3: Mul iple Reg ession Analysis
Va iable
Be a (β)
S anda d E o
- alue
p- alue
Collec i e Collabo a ion
0.45
0.08
5.63
0.000
Ne wo king
0.52
0.07
7.43
0.000
R²
0.62
Adjus ed R²
0.61
F- alue
78.56
0.000
Table 4: Summa y o Findings
Hypo hesis
Independen Va iable(s)
Dependen
Va iable
P edic ed Rela ionship
H₁
Collec i e collabo a ion
Weal h c ea ion
Posi i e and signi ican
H₂
Ne wo king
Weal h c ea ion
Posi i e and signi ican
H₃
Collec i e collabo a ion +
Ne wo king
Weal h c ea ion
Syne gis ic and s onge han indi idual e ec s
DISCUSSION
The indings o his s udy e eal a signi ican posi i e ela ionship be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion
in Nige ian SMEs. The esul s sugges ha SMEs ha engage in collec i e collabo a ion and obus ne wo king ac i i ies a e mo e
likely o achie e highe le els o weal h c ea ion. These indings a e consis en wi h p e ious s udies ha ha e highligh ed he
Un a eling he Nexus o Collec i e Collabo a ion and Ne wo king in SMEs: Analysing Collec i e Ac ion o
Weal h C ea ion in Nige ia
IJSSHMR, Volume 04 Issue 11 No embe 2025 www.ijsshm .com Page 2164
impo ance o collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king o he g ow h and success o SMEs (Noo eboom, 1999; Che y & Holm,
2000).
The posi i e impac o collec i e collabo a ion on weal h c ea ion can be a ibu ed o he abili y o SMEs o pool esou ces, sha e
isks, and access new ma ke s h ough collabo a i e a angemen s. By wo king oge he , SMEs can o e come esou ce cons ain s
and achie e economies o scale, he eby enhancing hei compe i i eness and capaci y o weal h c ea ion. Simila ly, he posi i e
impac o ne wo king on weal h c ea ion can be a ibu ed o he abili y o SMEs o le e age ex e nal esou ces, gain ma ke
in elligence, and build s a egic alliances h ough ne wo king ac i i ies.
The combined e ec o collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king on weal h c ea ion unde sco es he impo ance o hese s a egies
o he g ow h and success o SMEs. The indings sugges ha SMEs ha adop a dual app oach o collec i e collabo a ion and
ne wo king a e mo e likely o achie e sus ainable g ow h and con ibu e o economic de elopmen . These indings ha e impo an
implica ions o policy and p ac ice, as hey highligh he need o policies and p og ams ha p omo e collec i e collabo a ion and
ne wo king among SMEs in Nige ia.
CONCLUSION
This s udy has un a eled he nexus be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs. The
indings e eal ha collec i e collabo a ion and ne wo king a e c i ical de e minan s o weal h c ea ion in SMEs, wi h bo h a iables
ha ing a signi ican posi i e impac on weal h c ea ion. The s udy concludes ha os e ing collec i e ac ion and obus ne wo king
can enhance weal h c ea ion in Nige ian SMEs, he eby con ibu ing o economic g ow h and de elopmen .
Implica ions o Policy and P ac ice
The indings o his s udy ha e se e al implica ions o policy and p ac ice. Fi s , policymake s should de elop policies and
p og ams ha p omo e collec i e collabo a ion among SMEs. This could include he es ablishmen o business clus e s,
coope a i es, and join en u es ha enable SMEs o pool esou ces, sha e isks, and access new ma ke s. Second, policymake s
should p omo e ne wo king among SMEs by acili a ing he es ablishmen o business ne wo ks, ade associa ions, and indus y
g oups ha enable SMEs o le e age ex e nal esou ces, gain ma ke in elligence, and build s a egic alliances.
Limi a ions and Fu u e Resea ch
This s udy has some limi a ions ha should be add essed in u u e esea ch. Fi s , he s udy ocused on SMEs in Nige ia, and he
indings may no be gene alizable o o he con ex s. Fu u e esea ch should examine he ela ionship be ween collec i e
collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion in SMEs in o he coun ies. Second, he s udy used a c oss-sec ional design, which
limi s he abili y o es ablish causal ela ionships. Fu u e esea ch should adop a longi udinal design o examine he causal
ela ionships be ween collec i e collabo a ion, ne wo king, and weal h c ea ion in SMEs.
REFERENCES
1) Adebayo, O. (2022). Ne wo king dynamics in Nige ian SMEs: The ole o cul u e and digi al pla o ms. Jou nal o A ican
Business, 23(3), 456–472. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/15228916.2022.2046789
2) Adle , P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capi al: P ospec s o a new concep . Academy o Managemen Re iew, 27(1),
17–40. h ps://doi.o g/10.5465/am .2002.5922314
3) Akinwale, Y. O., Oluwa obi, S. O., & Olu inola, I. O. (2019). Inno a ion and SME pe o mance in Nige ia: The media ing
ole o in as uc u e. Technological Fo ecas ing and Social Change, 146, 437–446.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j. ech o e.2019.05.017
4) A iyo, D. (2005). Small i ms a e he backbone o he Nige ian economy. A ican Economic Analysis, 1(3), 1–13.
5) Aud e sch, D. B., & Thu ik, A. R. (2001). Wha 's new abou he new economy? Sou ces o g ow h in he managed and
en ep eneu ial economies. Indus ial and Co po a e Change, 10(1), 267-315.
6) Ba ney, J. B. (1991). Fi m esou ces and sus ained compe i i e ad an age. Jou nal o Managemen , 17(1), 99–
120. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/014920639101700108
7) Beck, T., & Demi güç-Kun , A. (2006). Small and medium-size en e p ises: Access o inance as a g ow h
cons ain . Jou nal o Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931-2943.
8) Che y, S., & Holm, D. B. (2000). In e na ionalisa ion o small o medium-sized manu ac u ing i ms: A ne wo k
app oach. In e na ional Business Re iew, 9(1), 77-93.
9) Co iello, N. E., & Mun o, H. J. (1997). Ne wo k ela ionships and he in e na ionalisa ion p ocess o small so wa e
i ms. In e na ional Business Re iew, 6(4), 361-386.
10) C eswell, J. W. (2014). Resea ch design: Quali a i e, quan i a i e, and mixed me hods app oaches. Sage publica ions.
11) G ano e e , M. (1985). Economic ac ion and social s uc u e: The p oblem o embeddedness. Ame ican Jou nal o
Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. h ps://doi.o g/10.1086/228311
Un a eling he Nexus o Collec i e Collabo a ion and Ne wo king in SMEs: Analysing Collec i e Ac ion o
Weal h C ea ion in Nige ia
IJSSHMR, Volume 04 Issue 11 No embe 2025 www.ijsshm .com Page 2165
12) G ano e e , M. S. (1973). The s eng h o weak ies. Ame ican Jou nal o Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1086/225469
13) GSMA. (2022). Digi al en ep eneu ship in Nige ia: Le e aging mobile pla o ms o SME g ow h. GSM Associa ion.
14) Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala in e na ionaliza ion p ocess model e isi ed: F om liabili y o
o eignness o liabili y o ou side ship. Jou nal o In e na ional Business S udies, 40(9), 1411-1431.
15) Madichie, N. O., & Nkamnebe, A. D. (2020). Ne wo king challenges in Nige ian SMEs: A ins i u ional oids
pe spec i e. Thunde bi d In e na ional Business Re iew, 62(3), 323–335. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/ ie.22145
16) Noo eboom, B. (1999). Inno a ion, lea ning and indus ial o ganisa ion. Camb idge Jou nal o Economics, 23(2), 127-
150.
17) No h, D. C. (1990). Ins i u ions, ins i u ional change and economic pe o mance. Camb idge Uni e si y P ess
18) OECD. (2020). SME policy esponses: Tackling COVID-19 and os e ing eco e y. OECD Publishing.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1787/2a3ad5d0-en
19) Opu e, A. P., Madichie, N. O., & Rahman, M. (2021). Ne wo king and SME pe o mance in eme ging economies: E idence
om Nige ia. Jou nal o Business Resea ch, 132, 646–657. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbus es.2020.11.056
20) Os om, E. (1990). Go e ning he commons: The e olu ion o ins i u ions o collec i e ac ion. Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
21) Oyela an-Oyeyinka, B. (2010). SME clus e s and ne wo ks in Nige ia: P ac ices, ins i u ions, and inno a ion. A ican
Jou nal o Science, Technology, Inno a ion and De elopmen , 2(3), 1–24.
22) Oyela an-Oyeyinka, B. (2010). SMEs and new echnologies: Lea ning e-business and de elopmen . Sp inge Science &
Business Media.
23) Po e , M. E. (1998). Clus e s and he new economics o compe i ion. Ha a d Business Re iew, 76(6), 77–90.
24) Schmi z, H. (1995). Collec i e e iciency: G ow h pa h o small-scale indus y. The Jou nal o De elopmen S udies,
31(4), 529-566.
25) Schumpe e , J. A. (1934). The heo y o economic de elopmen . Ha a d Uni e si y P ess.
26) Wo ld Bank. (2020). Nige ia de elopmen upda e: Na iga ing he pandemic. Wo ld Bank G oup.
27) Zengeni, K. T., & Zengeni, D. M. (2020). Collec i e ac ion and SME pe o mance in Tanzania: The ole o ins i u ional
suppo . Jou nal o En ep eneu ship in Eme ging Economies, 12(4), 567–588. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/JEEE-05-2019-
0067
