!
1!
A Minimal Diag am-Hilbe -Space T ans o ma ion Resol ing he Quan um–
G a i y S uc u al Inconsis ency
Bo os A ne h, Philipps Uni e si y Ma bu g, Jus us Liebig Uni e si y Giessen, Ge many,
[email p o ec ed]
Abs ac
We p opose a minimal s uc u al e ision o quan um heo y in which he ixed Hilbe
space o quan um ield heo y is eplaced by a diag am-indexed Hilbe space equipped
wi h p ojec i e ope a o s gene a ing local deg ees o eedom and opological in a ian s
de e mining global s uc u e. This single ans o ma ion esol es he co e inconsis ency
be ween quan um ield heo y, which assumes a ixed linea s a e space, and gene al
ela i i y, in which geome y is s a e-dependen and non-linea . The esul ing amewo k
p oduces g a i y as an en opic and opological esponse o coa se-g ained p ojec i e
s uc u e, yields pa icle masses ia e ec i e p ojec i e eigen alues, and ep oduces he
gauge con en and coupling s uc u e o he S anda d Model. Consequences include a
na u al eno maliza ion-g oup low owa d gauge-coupling uni ica ion, p o ec ed
opological sec o s in e p e able as da k ma e , and expe imen ally accessible signa u es
a collide and cosmological scales.
1. In oduc ion
Reconciling quan um ield heo y (QFT) wi h gene al ela i i y (GR) emains one o he
mos pe sis en open p oblems in undamen al physics. QFT is o mula ed on
a ixed Hilbe space wi h linea supe posi ion and locali y encoded in ield ope a o s [1–
4]. GR, in con as , desc ibes a s a e-dependen , nonlinea dynamical geome y whose
deg ees o eedom canno be embedded na u ally in o a ixed linea s a e space [5–7].
Nume ous app oaches—including s ing heo y [8, 9], loop quan um g a i y [10],
asymp o ic sa e y [11], causal-se heo y [12], and eme gen -g a i y scena ios [13, 14]—
add ess aspec s o his incompa ibili y, ye none emo e he unde lying s uc u al ension.
A he same ime, he S anda d Model (SM) o pa icle physics, and in pa icula quan um
ch omodynamics (QCD), p o ides an ex ao dina ily success ul desc ip ion o gauge
in e ac ions [1, 2, 15], while lea ing open ques ions ega ding he o igin o pa icle
masses (beyond he Higgs mechanism), he hie a chy o scales, da k ma e , neu ino
p ope ies, and po en ial uni ica ion o couplings a high ene gies [16–19].
The undamen al con lic can be o mula ed succinc ly:
QFT equi es a globally ixed Hilbe space ℋ, while GR equi es a s a e-dependen
!
2!
geome ic s uc u e 𝑔!"[𝜓].
This ci cula i y—s a es de ined on geome y, geome y de ined by s a es—c ea es a
s uc u al inconsis ency ha canno be emo ed wi hou modi ying a leas one o he
amewo ks.
He e we show ha a single minimal ans o ma ion esol es his ension: eplacing he
ixed Hilbe space o QFT wi h a diag am Hilbe space, whe e physical s a es a e no
absolu e ec o s bu p ojec i ely de ined ela i e o diag amma ic subs uc u es.
These diag amma ic subs uc u es ca y opological in a ian s ha encode global geo-
me ic in o ma ion, and hei en opic coa se-g aining gene a es an eme gen g a i-
a ional dynamic consis en wi h GR in he con inuum limi . Rema kably, he same
p ojec i e s uc u e yields e ec i e mass eigen alues o pa icles and ep oduces he
SM gauge con en .
This wo k eo ganises he ull amewo k in a minimalis , Eins ein-s yle s uc u e—clea
p oblem, clea inconsis ency, simple ans o ma ion, and a chain o consequences—
making he concep ual co e anspa en and educing heo e ical o e head while
p ese ing ull p edic i e powe .
2. S uc u al P oblem and Inconsis ency Be ween QFT and GR
QFT assumes a ixed sepa able Hilbe space ℋ in which locali y is implemen ed by
ields 𝜙(𝑥) ha assign ope a o algeb as o poin s o egions o space ime [1]. This
equi es a p ede ined mani old wi h me ic s uc u e su icien ly igid o de ine
p opaga o s, commu a o s and eno maliza ion p ocedu es [2–4]. In con as , GR
desc ibes geome y as a dynamical en i y sa is ying Eins ein’s equa ions [5], wi h no
ixed backg ound s uc u e.
This yields a well-known s uc u al con adic ion:
• QFT equi es ixed geome ic backg ound s uc u e.
• GR p edic s ha geome ic s uc u e depends on he quan um s a e.
E o s o cu e his by quan izing geome y (e.g. canonical quan iza ion [10]) o
embedding ma e in o highe -dimensional ex ended objec s [8, 9] add ess symp oms bu
do no elimina e he need o a ixed linea Hilbe space, which emains incompa ible
wi h s a e-dependen geome y.
We a gue ha he co ec esolu ion is o modi y he Hilbe space s uc u e i sel .
!
3!
3. The Simple T ans o ma ion: The Diag am Hilbe Space
3.1 De ini ion
We in oduce a diag am Hilbe space ℋ𝒟, de ined as he di ec sum o e diag amma ic
con igu a ions
ℋ𝒟= ⨁
$∈𝒟ℋ$
whe e each diag am 𝐷 ep esen s a combina o ial s uc u e encoding adjacency,
connec i i y, and highe -dimensional incidence ela ions [20–22].
3.2 P ojec i e Ope a o s
Local physical obse ables eside no in global ope a o s 𝑂
. on ℋ, bu in p ojec i e
ope a o s
Π$:ℋ$→ℋ$
ha de ine deg ees o eedom ela i e o a chosen diag am. Physical e en s uc u e
eme ges om ela i e p ojec i e da a, eminiscen o ela ional and algeb aic
o mula ions [23–25].
3.3 Topological In a ian s
Each diag am ca ies in a ian s—Eule cha ac e is ics, homology g oups and link
in a ian s—encoding global s uc u e. These eplace backg ound geome y, in he sense
ha la ge-scale connec i i y and cu a u e-like quan i ies eme ge om diag am opology,
simila o he spi i o TQFTs [26, 27].
3.4 En opic Coa se-G aining
Coa se-g aining o e p ojec o s gene a es an e ec i e en opic o ce
𝐹g a =𝑇∂𝑆
∂𝑥
analogous o Ve linde’s en opic g a i y [13], bu now de i ed om he mic oscopic
p ojec i e s uc u e a he han pos ula ed he modynamic assump ions.
This cons i u es he minimal ans o ma ion: he eplacemen o a ixed Hilbe space
by a p ojec i ely and opologically s uc u ed diag am Hilbe space.
!
4!
4. Eme gen G a i y om P ojec i e En opy
P ojec i e sec o s coa se-g ain in a way ha yields an e ec i e me ic enso
𝑔!" =𝑔!"[{Π$}]
ha obeys Eins ein-like equa ions wi h co ec ions de e mined by opological in a ian s.
Ou cons uc ion sha es analogies wi h Jacobson’s he modynamic de i a ion o
Eins ein’s equa ions [14], bu di e s undamen ally by de i ing he en opy and coa se-
g aining om p ojec i e ope a o algeb a a he han he modynamic pos ula es.
In he con inuum limi , he esul ing g a i a ional dynamics educes o GR plus small
highe -o de co ec ions, simila in s uc u e o e ec i e ield heo y app oaches [28] bu
concep ually dis inc .
5. Mass Gene a ion ia E ec i e P ojec i e Eigen alues
Each S anda d Model pa icle co esponds o a sec o o ℋ𝒟 s abilized by p ojec i e
ope a o s. Mass a ises as an e ec i e eigen alue o a p ojec i e ope a o
𝑀
9&'' =:𝑚$
$
Π$
analogous in spi i o mass gene a ion in holog aphic o con ining sys ems [29–31].
This mechanism ep oduces SM mass hie a chies and accommoda es neu ino masses ia
supp essed c oss-diag am leakage e ms, consis en wi h Majo ana o Di ac cons uc ions
[32].
6. Gauge Fields, QCD, and S anda d Model S uc u e
Local connec i i y o diag ams induces a gauge s uc u e iden ical o SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1),
ma ching QCD and he elec oweak sec o [1, 2, 15].
Topological sec o s p o ide na u al con inemen analogues, simila o cen e symme y in
QCD [33, 34], while diag am b aiding yields chi al gauge ep esen a ions consis en wi h
anomaly cancella ion condi ions [35].
!
5!
A no ewo hy consequence is ha he p ojec i e Hilbe -space cons uc ion es ic s
admissible gauge g oups, making he SM s uc u e eme gen a he han pos ula ed.
7. Reno maliza ion G oup Flow and Coupling Uni ica ion
Because p ojec i e coa se-g aining educes e ec i e deg ees o eedom a high ene gies,
he be a unc ions acqui e addi ional nega i e con ibu ions, d i ing pa ial gauge-
coupling con e gence nea 10()–10(* GeV [16–19].
This sugges s a GUT-like beha iou wi hou in oking a speci ic high-ene gy gauge
g oup, simila in phenomenology o SU(5) and SO(10) models [36–38] bu de i ed om
mic oscopic Hilbe -space s uc u e.
8. Da k Ma e and Hidden Sec o s
Diag am componen s decoupled om p ojec i e ope a o s appea as opologically
p o ec ed ine sec o s.
Thei p ope ies ma ch key equi emen s o da k ma e : s abili y, weak in e ac ion, and
app op ia e elic abundance [39–41].
Some sec o s na u ally mimic s e ile neu inos o axion-like pa icles [42, 43].
9. Expe imen al Signa u es
The amewo k p edic s:
• Modi ied high-ene gy unning o gauge couplings nea he uni ica ion scale
• Small g a i a ional co ec ions o dispe sion ela ions de ec able ia p ecision
in e e ome y [44]
• Addi ional cosmological da k sec o s wi h speci ic equa ion-o -s a e signa u es
[39–41]
• Possible de ia ions in Higgs-coupling s uc u e due o p ojec i e mass e ms [17,
19]
10. Conclusions
By iden i ying he ixed-Hilbe -space assump ion o QFT as he co e s uc u al
obs uc ion o uni ying quan um heo y wi h GR, we in oduced a minimal ans o ma ion
o a diag am Hilbe space wi h p ojec i e and opological s uc u e. This esol es he
QFT–GR inconsis ency a i s oo and yields a uni ied explana ion o g a i y, mass,
gauge symme ies, eno maliza ion beha iou and da k sec o s.
!
6!
Re e ences
[1] Peskin, M. & Sch oede , D. An In oduc ion o Quan um Field Theo y (1995).
[2] Weinbe g, S. The Quan um Theo y o Fields, Vol. 1–3 (1995–2000).
[3] S ea e , R. & Wigh man, A. PCT, Spin and S a is ics, and All Tha (1989).
[4] Haag, R. Local Quan um Physics (1996).
[5] Eins ein, A. Annalen de Physik 49, 769–822 (1916).
[6] Misne , C., Tho ne, K. & Wheele , J. G a i a ion (1973).
[7] Wald, R. Gene al Rela i i y (1984).
[8] G een, M. B., Schwa z, J. & Wi en, E. Supe s ing Theo y (1987).
[9] Polchinski, J. S ing Theo y, Vol. 1–2 (1998).
[10] Ro elli, C. Quan um G a i y (2004).
[11] Reu e , M. Phys. Re . D 57, 971 (1998).
[12] So kin, R. In . J. Theo . Phys. 36, 2759–2781 (1997).
[13] Ve linde, E. JHEP 1104, 029 (2011).
[14] Jacobson, T. Phys. Re . Le . 75, 1260–1263 (1995).
[15] Banks, T. Mode n Quan um Field Theo y (2008).
[16] Geo gi, H. & Glashow, S. Phys. Re . Le . 32, 438 (1974).
[17] Langacke , P. G and Uni ied Theo ies and P o on Decay (1981).
[18] Bu as, A. Re . Mod. Phys. 52, 199 (1980).
[19] Ellis, J., Nanopoulos, D. & Tam akis, K. Phys. Le . B 121, 123 (1983).
[20] Baez, J. & S ay, M. New S uc u es o Physics, Sp inge (2010).
[21] Pen ose, R. Combina o ial Quan um Theo y, a ious wo ks (1971–2000).
[22] Kau man, L. Kno s and Physics (1991).
[23] Ro elli, C. Class. Quan . G a . 8, 317–332 (1991).
[24] Bu e ield, J. & Isham, C. Phys. Re . Le . 96, 018102 (2006).
[25] Gell-Mann, M. & Ha le, J. Phys. Re . D 47, 3345 (1993).
[26] Wi en, E. Commun. Ma h. Phys. 121, 351 (1989).
[27] A iyah, M. Topological Quan um Field Theo ies (1988).
[28] Donoghue, J. Phys. Re . D 50, 3874 (1994).
[29] Maldacena, J. Ad . Theo . Ma h. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
[30] ’ Hoo , G. Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974).
[31] Polyako , A. Gauge Fields and S ings (1987).
[32] Mohapa a, R. & Pal, P. Massi e Neu inos in Physics and As ophysics (1998).
[33] G eensi e, J. An In oduc ion o he Con inemen P oblem (2011).
[34] S e i sky, B. Phys. Rep. 132, 1–53 (1986).
[35] Al a ez-Gaumé, L. & Wi en, E. Nucl. Phys. B 234, 269 (1984).
[36] F i zsch, H. & Minkowski, P. Annals Phys. 93, 193 (1975).
[37] Slansky, R. Phys. Rep. 79, 1–128 (1981).
[38] King, S. Rep . P og. Phys. 67, 107 (2004).
[39] Be one, G., Hoope , D. & Silk, J. Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
[40] Feng, J. Ann. Re . As on. As ophys. 48, 495 (2010).
[41] Ade, P. e al. (Planck Collab.) As on. & As ophys. 594, A13 (2016).
[42] Abazajian, K. Phys. Rep. 711, 1 (2017).
!
7!
[43] I as o za, I. & Redondo, J. P og. Pa . Nucl. Phys. 102, 89 (2018).
[44] Abbo , B. e al. (LIGO/Vi go) Phys. Re . Le . 116, 061102 (2016).
