49
PRAGMALINGUISTIC MECHANISMS OF HINTING IN ENGLISH
COMMUNICATION
Uzako a A.K.,
Uni e si y o Inno a ion Technologies
Naimo a N.K.,
Uni e si y o Inno a ion Technologies
DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.17712203
Abs ac . This a icle shows ha implici meaning is no deco a ion bu he engine o English
communica ion. I explains, in simple e ms, how people say one hing and mean a li le mo e: h ough
con e sa ional implica u e, p esupposi ion, con en ional implica u e, and indi ec ness wi h poli eness.
Key wo ds: hin ; indi ec ness; implica u e; poli eness; ace; ele ance; English discou se.
A hin is when he speake does no say some hing di ec ly bu expec s he
lis ene o unde s and i om con ex , sha ed knowledge and he mos sensible
in e p e a ion o he si ua ion. In e e yday English his is e y common: i helps o be
poli e, o a oid con lic , o sa e ime, o o keep op ions open. A hin usually builds on a
no mal, li e al sen ence, bu he in ended meaning is a li le wide o sligh ly di e en .
The lis ene eco e s his ex a meaning because we end o in e p e u e ances o
op imal ele ance o he he e-and-now audience [2].
How do lis ene s ecognise a hin (some, a bi , migh , maybe)? The e a e simple,
p ac ical signals. The wo ding looks oo weak o he si ua ion; he speake chooses a
ques ion whe e an o de would be expec ed; he e is an ob ious piece o con ex ha
makes he sen ence ele an in a special way; o he sen ence con ains a con as wo d
like bu ha adds an ex a message beyond plain logic. In sho , we ma ch he sen ence
wi h he si ua ion and choose he eading ha makes he speake ’s mo e pu pose ul and
poli e.
Conside sho , na u al examples (a e each example he hidden message is gi en
in b acke s). “The mee ing oom window likes o s ay open.” (Please close i .) The
sen ence looks like a joke abou he window; he eal goal is a poli e eques wi hou a
di ec impe a i e. “Could you possibly send he ile be o e lunch?” (Please send i soon;
I need i .) A ques ion wi h a so ene (could, possibly) does he wo k o a eques while
educing p essu e. “I p omised o s ay o line onigh .” (I’m e using he ex a ask.) A
simple s a emen unc ions as a e usal bu gi es a eason and he e o e p o ec s bo h
sides’ aces. “We sol ed some o he issues.” (P obably no all o hem.) The wo d some
o en leads he lis ene o in e “no all”, unless he speake adds a co ec ion; his is a
ypical scala hin in English [4].
50
“They’ e ehea sing in S udio B again.” (They ehea sed he e be o e- his is
backg ound we ake o g an ed.) A wo d like again b ings in hidden backg ound; he
speake ea s i as sha ed knowledge and mo es on [5].
These examples show he usual ools o hin ing. Fi s , lexical so ene s and
hedges (maybe, migh , a bi , kind o , a ouch) keep he doo open and lowe he o ce o
he claim. Second, ques ions o en ac as eques s (Could you…? Would you mind…?),
because ques ions sound less imposing han commands and help p o ec ace [3]. Thi d,
unde s a emen and euphemism allow c i icism wi hou open a ack: “The epo was…
mixed.” The lis ene easily hea s “ he e we e p oblems,” ye no one loses ace. Fou h,
con as ma ke s (especially bu ) signal how o weigh good and bad news in one
sen ence. Fi h, backg ound igge s like again, s op, oo quie ly add sha ed assump ions
ha guide he con e sa ion wi hou demanding ex a sen ences. Six h, one and channel
ma e : in emails we lack oice and acial cues, so w i e s add hedges (migh , pe haps)
o show a ca e ul s ance: “The igu es migh need a second look.” This is s ill a hin
(“please e ise”), bu i is sa e and kinde .
How can we check whe he we a e dealing wi h a hin ? Th ee quick es s a e
help ul in p ac ice. Fi s , can he ex a meaning be wo ked ou om con ex and
common sense? I yes, we p obably ha e an implica u e, a classic p agma ic hin .
Second, can he speake ake i back wi hou a con adic ion? Fo ins ance: “Some o he
issues… ac ually, all o hem.” I yes, ha is he igh beha iou o a con e sa ional
hin . Thi d, does a pa icula wo d “ca y” a side message by i sel ? I he ex a meaning
is ied o a speci ic o m (like bu o a non- es ic i e apposi i e), hen he hin is
con en ional and will disappea i we change he o m. These p ac ical es s ollow he
co e ideas abou con e sa ional implica u e, cancellabili y and easoning in con ex [1].
Wha can go w ong wi h hin s? Misunde s anding appea s when he speake and
he lis ene do no sha e he same backg ound o expec a ions. A e y so e usal may
be hea d as ag eemen ; a play ul unde s a emen may be aken as p aise. To a oid his,
good speake s gi e double signals: hey combine a hin wi h a small explici cue-“Could
you possibly mo e his o omo ow? I’m a aid I won’ manage onigh .” Good
lis ene s con i m poli ely-“So you p e e omo ow mo ning, igh ?” When he opic is
sensi i e (deadlines, money, c i icism), a sho ollow-up line o en sa es ime and ace
o e e yone.
In daily wo k English, hin s a e use ul ools. They le us ad ise wi hou
commanding, co ec wi hou shaming, e use wi hou b eaking ies, and plan oge he
wi hou long explana ions. A he same ime, hey a e no andom. They ollow simple
p inciples: be coope a i e; be ele an o he momen ; choose a wo ding ha i s he
ela ionship; and lea e he o he pe son a com o able pa h o espond. Because o his,
51
hin s a e easy o lea n and o each ou sel es: we wa ch good speake s, copy hei
so ene s and pa e ns, and p ac ise pai ing a sho li e al sen ence wi h a clea , kind
in en ion.
In conclusion, hin ing is a cen al, e e yday mechanism o English p agma ics. I
es s on coope a i e easoning, poli eness, and small bu powe ul linguis ic choices
(so ene s, ques ions, con as ma ke s, backg ound igge s). When we unde s and how
hin s a e signalled and ecognised, we communica e wi h mo e ac and ewe
misunde s andings-exac ly he aim o p agmalinguis ics.
Re e ences:
1. G ice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Con e sa ion. In P. Cole & J. L. Mo gan (Eds.), Syn ax and
Seman ics 3: Speech Ac s (pp. 41–58). New Yo k: Academic P ess.
2. Spe be , D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Rele ance: Communica ion and Cogni ion (2nd ed.). Ox o d:
Blackwell.
3. B own, P., & Le inson, S. C. (1987). Poli eness: Some Uni e sals in Language Usage.
Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
4. Le inson, S. C. (2000). P esump i e Meanings: The Theo y o Gene alized Con e sa ional
Implica u e. Camb idge, MA: MIT P ess.
5. Bea e , D. I. (2001). P esupposi ion and Asse ion in Dynamic Seman ics. S an o d, CA: CSLI
Publica ions.
