scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Uncertainties in Characteristic Strengths of Historic Steels Using Non-Destructive Techniques

Abstract

The use of various non- or minor-destructive tests (NDTs) is often preferred to reduce the cost of structural surveys of historic structures made of cast and wrought irons or old carbon steels. This contribution thus explores the measurement errors associated with common NDT techniques and quantifies uncertainties in characteristic strength estimates based on NDTs only. It appears that a unity mean and coefficient of variation of 12% might be adopted for the measurement uncertainty of the methods under study (Brinell, Leeb, Poldi, Vickers, Rockwell). On average, the true characteristic ultimate strength is by ~15% larger than that based on many NDTs. This represents the expected gain when the characteristic value is estimated from five DTs instead of a large number of NDTs. In practice detailed reliability assessments should always be based on result

Read accessible full text

Uncertainties in Characteristic Strengths of Historic Steels Using Non-Destructive Techniques

Author: Sýkora, Miroslav
Publisher: Vysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostrava
Year: 2019
DOI: 10.35181/tces-2019-0022
Source: https://dspace.vsb.cz/bitstreams/df6aa871-8213-47a3-bf62-c66b40821117/download
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 2 | 2019 | DECEMBER
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 65
UNCERTAINTIES IN CHARACTERISTIC STRENGTHS
OF HISTORIC STEELS USING NON-DESTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES
Mi osla SÝKORA1, Jan MLČOCH1, Pa el RYJÁČEK2
1Depa men o S uc u al Reliabili y, Klokne Ins i u e, Czech Technical Uni e si y in P ague,
Šolíno a 7, P ague, Czech Republic
2Depa men o S eel and Timbe S uc u es, Facul y o Ci il Enginee ing, Czech Technical Uni e si y in P ague,
Tháku o a 7, P ague, Czech Republic
mi osla [email p o ec ed], [email p o ec ed], pa el. yjacek@ s .c u .cz
DOI: 10.35181/ ces-2019-0022
Abs ac . The use o a ious non- o mino -des uc i e
es s (NDTs) is o en p e e ed o educe he cos o
s uc u al su eys o his o ic s uc u es made o cas and
w ough i ons o old ca bon s eels. This con ibu ion hus
explo es he measu emen e o s associa ed wi h common
NDT echniques and quan i ies unce ain ies in
cha ac e is ic s eng h es ima es based on NDTs only. I
appea s ha a uni y mean and coe icien o a ia ion o
12% migh be adop ed o he measu emen unce ain y
o he me hods unde s udy (B inell, Leeb, Poldi, Vicke s,
Rockwell). On a e age, he ue cha ac e is ic ul ima e
s eng h is by ~15% la ge han ha based on many
NDTs. This ep esen s he expec ed gain when he
cha ac e is ic alue is es ima ed om i e DTs ins ead o
a la ge numbe o NDTs. In p ac ice de ailed eliabili y
assessmen s should always be based on esul s o DTs o
a leas on NDTs p ope ly calib a ed by DTs.
Keywo ds
His o ic s eel, cha ac e is ic s eng h, i on,
measu emen e o , non-des uc i e es , unce ain y.
1. In oduc ion
The mechanical p ope ies o his o ic me al ma e ials
such as cas and w ough i ons o old ca bon s eels
exhibi a conside able sca e dependen on pe iods o
cons uc ion and he egion o a p oduce , esul ing in
di e ences in he p oduc ion p ocedu e, i s quali y and
alloy composi ion [1] and [2]. Commonly, he design
documen a ion o his o ic s uc u es is missing and he e
is no clea ela ionship be ween ma e ial s eng hs and
yea o execu ion o his o ic s eel b idges in he Czech
Republic [3]. This is why he in o ma ion o hei
assessmen s needs o be based on measu emen s and es s
only [4] and [5]. The use o a ious non- o mino -
des uc i e es s (NDTs) is o en p e e ed o e o
des uc i e es s (DTs) o educe he cos o s uc u al
su ey and damage o he s uc u e.
Howe e , limi ed a en ion has been paid o he
in es iga ion o unce ain ies in cha ac e is ic s eng h
es ima es based on NDTs only. This is why he submi ed
con ibu ion explo es he measu emen e o s associa ed
wi h common NDT ha dness echniques and quan i ies
unce ain ies in cha ac e is ic s eng h es ima es. The
measu emen unce ain y is assessed conside ing he
da abase o pai s o NDTs and DTs aken om his o ic
s uc u es om he 19 h cen u y.
2. Expe imen al Da abase
The da abase con ains 119 pai s o NDT and DT esul s
ob ained om mos ly ailway b idges and some buildings
om he second hal o he 19 h cen u y. Mos o he es
esul s we e published in p e ious scien i ic
con ibu ions [6], [7], [8], [9] and [10]. The es s o
ensile s eng h we e conduc ed by he ollowing
me hods:
1. DT esul s a e based on ensile es s acco ding o
ISO 6892 o ensile es ing o me allic ma e ials
unde no mal empe a u es. The es unce ain y
is negligible (coe icien o a ia ion, “CoV”,
V < 1%) [11].
2. The ollowing NDT me hods we e used o
de e mine ul ima e s eng h o his o ic s eels on
he basis o empi ical ela ionships wi h
ha dness o he ma e ial:
• s a ic (B inell, Rockwell, Vicke s),
• dynamic (Poldi hamme , Leeb).
The ma e ials unde in es iga ion include w ough i ons
and his o ic s eels.
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 2 | 2019 | DECEMBER
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 66
3. Measu emen Unce ain y
In line wi h common p ac ice, he measu emen s aken a
a s uc u e a e assumed o be independen obse a ions.
The da abase con ains no ob ious ou lie s; o ins ance,
measu emen s beyond he limi s o calib a ion cu es o
e y small/ high NDT s eng hs in pai s wi h mode a e
DT s eng hs ha could explained as measu emen s a
local non-homogenei ies.
The measu emen unce ain y ε is ea ed he e as a
andom a iable. A widely adop ed mul iplica i e o ma
o measu emen unce ain y is aken in o accoun :
DT = ε NDT, (1)
whe e deno es s eng h o he ma e ial.
Following he obse a ions ela ed o model
unce ain y [12], he mul iplica i e o ma is mo e
app op ia e when he di e ence be ween measu emen s
and ue alues – DT s eng hs he e – is p opo ional o
he la e . When he di e ence is independen o he
magni ude o a ue alue, he addi i e o ma becomes
mo e app op ia e.
The mul iplica i e o ma is assumed he ea e o be
ep esen a i e o NDT measu emen s. Ou lie s a e
de ec ed by he signi icance es (G ubb’s es [13]) and
excluded om u he analyses (one NDT esul o
B inell, Vicke s, and Leeb es s). The measu emen
unce ain y cha ac e is ics – mean με and CoV Vε – a e
gi en in Tab. 1. NDT esul s a e compa ed wi h
espec i e DTs o a) B inell, b) Leeb, and c) all ha dness
me hods in Fig. 1.
Conside ing b oadly di e en sample sizes o he
NDT me hods, he measu emen unce ain y
cha ac e is ics in Tab. 1 indica e ha he same mean and
CoV migh be adop ed o he me hods unde s udy in a
i s app oxima ion, με ≈ 1 and Vε ≈ 12%. This
assump ion is also suppo ed by:
• he same p inciple o he me hods, based on he
ela ionship o ha dness and ma e ial s eng h,
• simila ac o s in luencing he measu emen
unce ain y and hus by he simila expec ed magni ude o
associa ed unce ain y.
Tab.1: Measu emen unce ain y cha ac e is ics o a ious NDT
me hods.
Me hod Sample size n Mean με CoV Vε
B inell 35 0.98 12 %
Leeb 51 1.01 12 %
Poldi 18 1.01 12 %
Vicke s 10 0.89 18 %
Rockwell 5 1.00 7 %
All 119 0.99 12 %
Fig. 1: Compa ison o NDTs and DTs o a) B inell, b) Leeb, and c) all
ha dness me hods (ou lie s ma ked).
No e ha hese ac o s include skills and expe ience
o he wo ke , quali y o specimen su ace, s i ness and
mass o he specimen, epea abili y o he es ing de ice,
homogenei y o ha dness o he ma e ial, numbe o
measu emen s o es ima e ha dness in one loca ion, and
200
300
400
500
600
700
200 300 400 500 600 700
NDT [MPa]
DT [MPa]
a) B inell
200
300
400
500
600
700
200 300 400 500 600 700
NDT [MPa]
DT [MPa]
b) Leeb
200
300
400
500
600
700
200 300 400 500 600 700
NDT [MPa]
DT [MPa]
c) all
Leeb B inell
Poldi Vicke s
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 2 | 2019 | DECEMBER
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 67
pa ly also he slope o he in es iga ed membe
(ho izon al s. e ical measu emen s hough commonly
compensa ed when con e ing ha dness o s eng h).
Fu he , a logno mal dis ibu ion ha is commonly
adop ed in conjunc ion wi h he mul iplica i e o ma o
he model o measu emen unce ain y [14] is assumed
o he measu emen unce ain y.
4. Unce ain y in Cha ac e is ic
S eng h Es ima e
The e ec o he measu emen unce ain y on he
es ima e o cha ac e is ic ul ima e s eng h is in es iga ed
by means o simula ions:
1. Ul ima e s eng h o w ough i ons and his o ic
s eels is o en simila o ha o he mode n s eel
S235, [3], [15] and [16]. The au ho s’ da abase
indica e ha a ue ul ima e s eng h o he
ma e ial o a pa icula in es iga ed his o ic
s uc u e could be desc ibed by:
• cha ac e is ic ul ima e s eng h
uk = 350 MPa, V u =
5%, and µ u = 380 MPa, and
• a logno mal dis ibu ion.
These assump ions a e in a b oad ag eemen wi h he
in o ma ion on his o ic me als gi en in ČSN 73 0038 –
he Czech s anda d on he assessmen o exis ing
s uc u es – as well as wi h he gene ic models o
mode n s eels p o ided in [14] and wi h empi ical
expe ience [17]. I is emphasised ha hese cha ac e is ics
apply o a homogeneous ma e ial – i is o en obse ed
in su eys o his o ic b idges ha ma e ial p ope ies
di e amongs a ious membe s such as be ween main
gi de s and seconda y membe s, beam and pla e membe s
e c.
2. The numbe o NDTs, nNDT (s udy pa ame e
he e) is ypically de e mined by he need o ha e
a easonable su ey o he s uc u e, o o i s
la ge pa ; i is commonly ela i ely la ge, say
a ound 25. NDT esul s a e sampled as ollows:
• A andom ealisa ion o a ue s eng h, u,i (i =
1..nNDT), is simula ed om a logno mal dis ibu ion wi h
he assumed mean and CoV.
• Using Eq. (1), he NDT esul is simula ed as u,NDT,i =
u,i / εi whe e he denomina o is a andom alue ob ained
om he logno mal dis ibu ion wi h με = 1 and Vε = 12%.
• The es ima e o cha ac e is ic s eng h based on nNDT
esul s, uk,NDT, is ob ained using he app oach in Annex D
o EN 1990:2002 (assuming a logno mal dis ibu ion and
“unknown CoV”).
• The e o in he es ima e hen becomes θj = uk /
uk,NDT,j = 350 MPa / uk,NDT,j.
3. This p ocedu e is epea ed nsim- imes (j =
1..nsim), o ob ain mean and CoV o he e o
una ec ed by s a is ical unce ain y. In his s udy
nsim is 1000.
4. To highligh he e ec o he measu emen
unce ain y, simila simula ions a e gene a ed
conside ing ha a numbe o DTs, nDT, is
a ailable. In his si ua ion he measu emen
unce ain y is negligible and DT esul s a e
assumed o be equal o u,i. The es ima e o
cha ac e is ic s eng h, uk,DT, is again ob ained
using Annex D o EN 1990:2002. The e o in
he es ima e hen becomes θj = 350 MPa / uk,DT,j.
The a iabili y o he mean, CoV and con idence
in e als o he e o θ wi h a numbe o es s is displayed
in Fig. 2. While he mean μθ al eady app oaches uni y
e ec i ely o a e y small numbe o DTs, say up o
i e, he measu emen unce ain y esul s in a sca e o
NDT esul s and μθ is a om uni y (con e ging o abou
1.15). This sugges s ha , on a e age, he ue
cha ac e is ic s eng h is by ~15% la ge han ha based
on a e y la ge numbe o NDTs while al eady o nDT = 5
he uk es ima e becomes easonably unbiased, μθ = 1.03.
The simila ends a e obse ed o he CoV o he
e o θ. Bo h mean and CoV a e hen e lec ed by he
con idence in e als plo ed in Fig. 2c). I is obse ed ha
o highe numbe s o es s, say nNDT > 15 and nDT > 5,
he expec ed di e ence be ween uk,NDT and uk,DT is
a ound 15%. This ep esen s he expec ed gain when he
cha ac e is ic alue is es ima ed based on i e DTs
ins ead o a la ge numbe o NDTs.
5. Discussion
The p esen s udy p o ides he backg ound in o ma ion
o u he esea ch ha will be aimed o deli e he
me hodology o es ima ing design s eng h alues o
his o ic me als based on NDTs and a small numbe o
DTs. When de i ing he pa ial ac o , he unce ain y in
geome y and model unce ain y need o be conside ed in
addi ion o he a iabili y o a ma e ial p ope y [2], [7]
and [18].
Acco ding o he bes p esen p ac ice, ma e ial
p ope ies based on NDTs only a e only used in
p elimina y eliabili y assessmen s (see ISO 13822:2010
o he assessmen o exis ing s uc u es and he
backg ound ma e ial o de eloping he guidance on
exis ing s uc u es in Eu ocodes [19]). The de ailed
assessmen s should always be based on esul s o DTs o
a leas on NDTs p ope ly calib a ed by ew DTs. This is
also in pa ial ag eemen wi h he s udy on w ough i on
b idges by Go don and Knop [20] who concluded ha ,
as a consequence o he composi e na u e o he ma e ial,
he e is a poo co ela ion be ween s eng h and ha dness
and he s anda d con e sions be ween di e en measu es
o ha dness do no apply.
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 2 | 2019 | DECEMBER
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 68
Fig. 2: Va iabili y o he cha ac e is ics o he e o θ wi h a numbe o
es s: a) mean, b) CoV, c) con idence in e als.
In p ac ice, he ul ima e s eng h is ypically u ilised
in a limi ed numbe o cases; e.g. when assessing
esis ance o i e s, join s o o sec ions wi h holes.
Mos ly u needs o be con e ed o yield s eng h, y. The
au ho s’ la ge da abase consis s o 265 pai measu emen s
o a io α = y / u o his o ic b idges da ed back o 1865-
1940. The p elimina y analysis indica es ha he a io α:
• exhibi s no end wi h ime, yield o ul ima e s eng h,
• could be desc ibed by he mean alue o 0.8 and CoV
o 10 %.
I hus appea s ha he CoV o α is compa able o ha o
measu emen unce ain y and i is conside ably la ge
han V u. As he a io α la gely depends on he chemical
composi ion o he alloy, u he in es iga ions a e
needed o imp o e he in o ma ion on i s s a is ical
p ope ies and p opose a p ocedu e on how o include he
unce ain y in α in p ac ical eliabili y assessmen s.
Fu he esea ch will also be ocused on:
• in es iga ing he abili y o NDTs in iden i ying
non-homogenei y o he ma e ial,
• de ailed analysis o NDT unce ain y wi h espec
o he ype o he me hod and ype o an
in es iga ed ma e ial,
• c i ical compa ison o he addi i e and
mul iplica i e o ma s o measu emen
unce ain y,
• p o iding a me hodology o es ima ing esis ance
cha ac e is ics o his o ic me al s uc u es,
conside ing also p e ious s udies in his ield [21]
and [22]; see also he i s esul s in [23].
6. Concluding Rema ks
As he mechanical p ope ies o his o ic me al ma e ials
exhibi a conside able sca e , he in o ma ion o
eliabili y assessmen s needs o be commonly based on
measu emen s and es s only. This con ibu ion explo es
he measu emen e o s associa ed wi h common NDT
ha dness echniques and quan i ies ela ed unce ain ies
in cha ac e is ic s eng h es ima es. The nume ical
analysis indica es ha :
• Uni y mean and coe icien o a ia ion o 12% migh
be adop ed o he measu emen unce ain y o he
me hods unde s udy (B inell, Leeb, Poldi, Vicke s,
Rockwell) as a i s app oxima ion.
• While he mean o he e o in he es ima e o
cha ac e is ic ul ima e s eng h (5% ac ile) app oaches
uni y e ec i ely o a e y small numbe o DTs, he
measu emen unce ain y esul s in a sca e o NDT
esul s and he mean o he es ima e is a om uni y. On
a e age i is expec ed ha he ue cha ac e is ic s eng h
is by ~15% la ge han ha based on a e y la ge numbe
o NDTs. This ep esen s he expec ed gain when he
mean o e o , μ
θ
a)
numbe o es s, n
NDT
o n
DT
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0 5 10 15 20 25
1.4
1.5
DTs
NDTs
CoV o e o , V
θ
b)
numbe o es s, n
NDT
o n
DT
0%
5%
10%
15%
0 5 10 15 20 25
20%
25%
NDTs
DTs
E o , θc)
numbe o es s, n
NDT
o n
DT
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
0 5 10 15 20 25
1.8
0.8
75% con idence in e al - NDTs
75% con idence in e al - DTs
SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 2 | 2019 | DECEMBER
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 69
cha ac e is ic alue is es ima ed based on i e DTs
ins ead o a la ge numbe o NDTs.
• To de i e he design alue, he es ima e o a 5%
ac ile needs o be di ided by a pa ial ac o ha
accoun s o he unce ain y in geome y and model
unce ain y in addi ion o he a iabili y o s eng h (and
possibly o he ac o s such as a ge eliabili y o ela i e
impo ance o he esis ance a iables wi h espec o he
limi s a e unde conside a ion).
I is emphasised ha de ailed eliabili y assessmen s
should always be based on esul s o DTs o a leas on
NDTs p ope ly calib a ed by DTs.
Acknowledgemen s
This wo k was suppo ed by he Minis y o Cul u e o
he Czech Republic unde G an DG18P02OVV033 ‘‘The
Me hods o Achie ing he Sus ainabili y o Indus ial
He i age S eel B idges”.
Re e ences
[1] JUNG, K., J. MARKOVA and M. SYKORA.
E alua ing S eng h o His o ic Cas I on using
Des uc i e and Non-des uc i e Tes s. Be on- und
S ahlbe onbau. 2018, Vol. 113, N . S2 - 16 h In .
P obabilis ic Wo kshop, 12-14 Sep 2018, pp. 141
(ex ended abs ac , 5 p. ull pape ). ISSN 0005-9900
(1437-1006 eISSN). DOI: 10.1002/bes .201800059.
[2] JUNG, K., J. MARKOVA and M. SYKORA.
Op imising Su eys and Reliabili y Assessmen s o
His o ic Cas -I on Columns. In P oc. HPSM/OPTI
2018. Ashu s Lodge: WIT P ess, 2018, pp. 71-82.
ISBN 978-178466289-9. DOI:
10.2495/HPSM180081.
[3] RYJÁČEK, P., M. MACHO, M. PAZMIŇO and J.
CAMPOS. Hodnocení deg ado aných ocelo ých
mos ů (Assessmen o deg aded s eel b idges - in
Czech). S a ebnic í (Jou nal o Ci il Enginee ing).
2019, N . 08/19, pp. 40-45. ISSN 1802-2030.
[4] MACHO, M., P. RYJÁCEK and J.C. MATOS.
S a ic and Fa igue Tes on Real S eel B idge
Componen s De e io a ed by Co osion. In .J.S eel
S uc . 2019, Vol. 19, N . 1, pp. 110-130. DOI:
10.1007/s13296-018-0099-6.
[5] RYJÁCEK, P. The diagnos ic echniques o he
assessmen o he his o ical s eel b idges. In IABSE
Symposium, Guima aes 2019: Towa ds a Resilien
Buil En i onmen Risk and Asse Managemen -
Repo . 2019, pp. 1651-1657.
[6] SYKORA, M. and M. HOLICKY. P obabilis ic
assessmen o a o me ac o y o boile p oduc ion.
In P oc. PROHITECH'14. Is anbul: Boğaziçi
Uni e si y Publishing, 2014, pp. 469-474. ISBN
978-975-518-361-9.
[7] JUNG, K., J. MARKOVA and M. SYKORA.
Es ima ing Design Resis ance o W ough Balcony
Gi de s. T ansac ions o he VSB - Technical
Uni e si y o Os a a, Ci il Enginee ing Se ies.
2017, Vol. 17, N . 1, pp. 51-60. ISSN 1804-4824
(Online), 1213-1962 (P in ). DOI: 10.1515/ sb-
2017-0007.
[8] HOŁOWATY JANUSZ and W. BERNARD. 16.22:
Rema ks on he ma e ial es ing o his o ical ailway
b idges: S eelwo ks buil om 1873 o 1950.
ce/pape s. 2017, Vol. 1, N . 2-3, pp. 4213-4222.
ISSN 2509-7075. DOI: 10.1002/cepa.479.
[9] WOUTERS, I., I. DE GRAEVE, D. VAN DE
VELDE, M. DE BOUW and Q. COLLETTE.
Towa ds a non-des uc i e me hodology o
dis inguish w ough i on om mild s eel in 19 h
cen u y s uc u es. In WIT T ansac ions on he Buil
En i onmen . 2011, pp. 285-293. ISSN 17433509;
ISBN 9781845645267. DOI: 10.2495/STR110241.
[10] HOLOWATY, J.M. and B. WICHTOWSKI.
P ope ies o s uc u al s eel used in ea lie ailway
b idges. S uc Eng In J In Assoc B idge S uc
Eng. 2013, Vol. 23, N . 4, pp. 512-518. ISSN 1016-
8664. DOI: 10.2749/101686613X13627347099999.
[11] SYKORA, M. and M. HOLICKY. Assessmen o
Unce ain ies in Mechanical Models. Appl Mech
Ma e . 2013, Vol. 378, N . 13, pp. 13-18. ISSN
16609336, ISBN 978-303785795-3. DOI:
10.4028/www.scien i ic.ne /AMM.378.13.
[12] HOLICKY, M., M. SYKORA and J.V. RETIEF.
Assessmen o Model Unce ain ies o S uc u al
Resis ance. P obabilis Eng Mech. 2016, Vol. 45,
N . -, pp. 188-197. ISSN 0266-8920. DOI:
10.1016/j.p obengmech.2015.09.008.
[13] HOLICKY, M. In oduc ion o P obabili y and
S a is ics o Enginee s. Be lin: Sp inge -Ve lag,
2013. 181 pp. ISBN 978-3-642-38299-4. DOI:
10.1007/978-3-642-38300-7.
[14] JCSS. JCSS P obabilis ic Model Code (pe iodically
upda ed, online publica ion). Join Commi ee on
S uc u al Sa e y, 2019. ISBN 978-3-909386-79-6.
[15] KÜHN, B., R. HELMERICH, A. NUSSBAUMER
e al. Assessmen o exis ing s eel s uc u es:
ecommenda ions o es ima ion o emaining
a igue li e. JRC, 2007. 89 pp. ISBN 1018-5593.
[16] SŽDC. Me odický pokyn p o u čo ání za íži elnos i
železničních mos ních objek ů (Me hodology o he
assessmen o load-bea ing capaci y o exis ing
ailway b idges, in Czech). P aha: Sp á a železniční
dop a ní ces y, s á ní o ganizace ( he Czech
Railway In as uc u e Adminis a ion), 2015. 116
pp.
[17] SIMÕES DA SILVA, L., C. REBELO, D.

SECTION BUILDING STRUCTURES & STRUCTURAL MECHANICS VOLUME: 19 | NUMBER: 2 | 2019 | DECEMBER
© 2019 TRANSACTIONS OF VSB - TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA CIVIL ENGINEERING SERIES 70
NETHERCOT, L. MARQUES, R. SIMÕES and
P.M.M. VILA REAL. S a is ical e alua ion o he
la e al– o sional buckling esis ance o s eel I-
beams, Pa 2: Va iabili y o s eel p ope ies.
Jou nal o Cons uc ional S eel Resea ch. 2009,
Vol. 65, N . 4, pp. 832-849. ISSN 0143-974X. DOI:
10.1016/j.jcs .2008.07.017.
[18] JUNG, K., J. MARKOVA, P. POKORNY and M.
SYKORA. Ma e ial P ope ies o He i age W ough
S eel S uc u e Based on Tes s. In J He i age
A chi ec u e. 2018, Vol. 2, N . 1, pp. 128-137. ISSN
2058-8321 (p in ), 2058-833X (elec onic). DOI:
10.2495/HA-V2-N1-128-137.
[19] CEN/TC250/WG2. Assessmen o Exis ing
S uc u es (d a o he echnical speci ica ion, Ma
2019, CEN/TC 250 N 2176). CEN TC250/ WG2,
2019. 54 pp.
[20] GORDON, R. and R. KNOPF. E alua ion o
w ough i on o con inued se ice in his o ic
b idges. J.Ma e .Ci .Eng. 2005, Vol. 17, N . 4, pp.
393-399. ISSN 08991561. DOI:
10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:4(393).
[21] RYJÁCEK, P., M. MACHO, V. STANCÍK and M.
POLÁK. De e io a ion and assessmen o s eel
b idges. In Main enance, Moni o ing, Sa e y, Risk
and Resilience o B idges and B idge Ne wo ks -
P oceedings o he 8 h In e na ional Con e ence on
B idge Main enance, Sa e y and Managemen ,
IABMAS 2016. CRC P ess/Balkema, 2016, pp.
1188-1195. ISBN 9781138028517.
[22] ŽITNÝ, J. and P. RYJÁCEK. Rese es in load
capaci y assessmen o exis ing b idges. IOP Con .
Se . Ma e . Sci. Eng. 2017, Vol. 236, N . 1, pp. 12-
61. ISSN 17578981. DOI:
10.1088/1757-899X/236/1/012061.
[23] LENNER, R., P. RYJÁČEK and M. SÝKORA.
Resis ance Models o Semi-P obabilis ic
Assessmen o His o ic S eel B idges (unde
e iew). In P oc. IABSE Symposium 2020. Zü ich:
IABSE, 2020, pp. 8.
Abou Au ho s
Mi osla SÝKORA was bo n in České Budějo ice,
Czech Republic. He ecei ed his M.Sc. in 2001 and Ph.D.
in 2005 om Facul y o Ci il Enginee ing, CTU in
P ague. His esea ch in e es s include basis o s uc u al
design, s uc u al eliabili y, p obabilis ic op imisa ion,
load modelling, isk assessmen o echnical sys ems, and
applica ions o p obabilis ic me hods in s uc u al design.
Jan MLČOCH was bo n in Mladá Bolesla , Czech
Republic. He ecei ed his M.Sc. in 2015 om Facul y o
Ci il Enginee ing, CTU in P ague. His esea ch in e es s
include unce ain y quan i ica ion and p obabilis ic
eliabili y analysis o ein o ced conc e e s uc u es.
Pa el RYJÁČEK was bo n in Plzeň, Czech Republic.
He ecei ed his M.Sc. in 2000 and Ph.D. in 2003 om
Facul y o Ci il Enginee ing, CTU in P ague. His
esea ch in e es s include s eel b idges (connec ions,
s abili y, composi e ac ions), FRP in he b idge
enginee ing, b idge assessmen and ein o cing, a igue
assessmen and b idge – ack in e ac ion.