scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Increased PIO2 at exhaustion in hypoxia enhances muscle activation and swiftly relieves fatigue: a placebo or a PIO2 dependent effect?

Abstract

1,765

Read accessible full text

Increased PIO2 at exhaustion in hypoxia enhances muscle activation and swiftly relieves fatigue: a placebo or a PIO2 dependent effect?

Author: Torres-Peralta, Rafael,Losa Reyna,Jose,Morales-Alamo, David,González-Izal, Miriam,Perez Suárez,Ismael,Ponce-González, Jesús G.,Izquierdo, Mikel,Calbet, José A.L.
Publisher: 1664-042X
Year: 2016
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00333
Source: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/bitstream/10553/44471/1/Increased_exhaustion_hypoxia.pdf
ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 August 2016 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00333 Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 1August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333 Edited by: Gregoire P. Millet, University of Lausanne, Switzerland Reviewed by: Tadej Debevec, Jožef Stefan Institute, Slovenia Thomas Rupp, University of Savoy, France *Correspondence: José A. L. Calbet [email protected] Specialty section: This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology Received: 17 March 2016 Accepted: 20 July 2016 Published: 17 August 2016 Citation: Torres-Peralta R, Losa-Reyna J, Morales-Alamo D, González-Izal M, Pérez-Suárez I, Ponce-González JG, Izquierdo M and Calbet JAL (2016) Increased PIO2at Exhaustion in Hypoxia Enhances Muscle Activation and Swiftly Relieves Fatigue: A Placebo or a PIO2Dependent Effect? Front. Physiol. 7:333. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00333 Increased PIO2at Exhaustion in Hypoxia Enhances Muscle Activation and Swiftly Relieves Fatigue: A Placebo or a PIO2Dependent Effect? Rafael Torres-Peralta1, 2, José Losa-Reyna1, 2, David Morales-Alamo1, 2, Miriam González-Izal3, Ismael Pérez-Suárez1, 2, Jesús G. Ponce-González1, Mikel Izquierdo3and José A. L. Calbet1, 2* 1Department of Physical Education, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain, 2Research Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Instituto Universitario de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias, Las Palmas, Spain, 3Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Tudela, Spain To determine the level of hypoxia from which muscle activation (MA) is reduced during incremental exercise to exhaustion (IE), and the role played by PIO2in this process, ten volunteers (21 ±2 years) performed four IE in severe acute hypoxia (SAH) (PIO2=73 mmHg). Upon exhaustion, subjects were asked to continue exercising while the breathing gas mixture was swiftly changed to a placebo (73 mmHg) or to a higher PIO2(82, 92, 99, and 142 mmHg), and the IE continued until a new exhaustion. At the second exhaustion, the breathing gas was changed to room air (normoxia) and the IE continued until the final exhaustion. MA, as reflected by the vastus medialis (VM) and lateralis (VL) EMG raw and normalized root mean square (RMSraw, and RMSNz, respectively), normalized total activation index (TAINz), and burst duration were 8–20% lower at exhaustion in SAH than in normoxia (P<0.05). The switch to a placebo or higher PIO2allowed for the continuation of exercise in all instances. RMSraw, RMSNz, and TAINz were increased by 5–11% when the PIO2was raised from 73 to 92, or 99 mmHg, and VL and VM averaged RMSraw by 7% when the PIO2was elevated from 73 to 142 mmHg (P<0.05). The increase of VM-VL average RMSraw was linearly related to the increase in PIO2, during the transition from SAH to higher PIO2(R2=0.915, P<0.05). In conclusion, increased PIO2at exhaustion reduces fatigue and allows for the continuation of exercise in moderate and SAH, regardless of the effects of PIO2on MA. At task failure, MA is increased during the first 10 s of increased PIO2when the IE is performed at a PIO2close to 73 mmHg and the PIO2is increased to 92 mmHg or higher. Overall, these findings indicate that one of the central mechanisms by which severe hypoxia may cause central fatigue and task failure is by reducing the capacity for reaching the appropriate level of MA to sustain the task. The fact that at exhaustion in severe hypoxia the exercise was continued with the placebo-gas mixture demonstrates that this central mechanism has a cognitive component. Keywords: fatigue, performance, hypoxia, altitude, muscle activation, human experimentation, exercise, oxygenation

Torres-Peralta et al. Oxygenation Effects on Muscle Activation at Fatigue INTRODUCTION Muscle activation, as reflected by the root mean square of the electromyographic signal (EMGRMS), is higher in severe acute hypoxia (SAH) than normoxia at the same absolute intensity, but lower in hypoxia than in normoxia at the same relative intensity (Torres-Peralta et al., 2014). Close to exhaustion, the surface integrated electromyographic (iEMG) activity is higher during constant-intensity exercise in hyperoxia (FIO2=0.30) than in SAH (FIO2=0.10) (Amann et al., 2007). This could mean that hypoxia limits the motor drive output from the central nervous system (CNS) leading to reduced muscle activation (MA) and task failure. In agreement with this idea, during exercise in severe hypoxia, fatigue is rapidly relieved by oxygenation with normoxic (Calbet et al., 2003a) or hyperoxic gas (Amann et al., 2007). If hypoxia depresses muscle activation, oxygenation should be accompanied by an immediate increase in MA while the intensity of exercise remains at the same absolute level. However, it remains unknown whether the ergogenic effect of an increase in oxygenation requires a concomitant elevation of muscle activation. During exercise in severe acute (Calbet et al., 2003a, 2015a; Amann et al., 2007; Morales-Alamo et al., 2015) and chronic hypoxia (Kayser et al., 1994; Calbet et al., 2003b) task failure is thought to be predominantly caused by central mechanisms sensitive to reduced O2delivery to the brain (Goodall et al., 2012, 2014) and to reduced interstitial brain PO2(Amann and Calbet, 2008). A fundamental difference between exercise in severe and moderate hypoxia is the region of the hemoglobin oxygen dissociation curve (ODC) at which the gas exchange occurs in the lungs. In severe hypoxia, pulmonary gas exchange occurs in the straight region of the ODC, implying that a small increase in arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) would result in a greater elevation of arterial hemoglobin saturation (SaO2) (Calbet et al., 2003a; Calbet and Lundby, 2009). In moderate hypoxia, pulmonary gas exchange occurs at the upper and flatter region of the ODC, where an improvement in PaO2 translates into a smaller elevation of SaO2(Amann et al., 2007). The fact that increasing inspiratory oxygen pressure (PIO2) to hyperoxic levels only relieved fatigue when applied at exhaustion in severe hypoxia could indicate that a substantial elevation of arterial oxygen content (CaO2) is required (Amann et al., 2007). However, the observation by Amann et al. (2007) that increased PIO2does not relieve fatigue during moderate hypoxia could indicate that the increase in SaO2is even more critical than the elevation of PaO2, since in the flatter region of the ODC the improvement of SaO2for a given increase of PaO2is smaller. It remains unknown what levels of improvement in PaO2and CaO2 are required to relieve fatigue and enhance the neural activation of muscles upon exhaustion in hypoxia. Therefore, the aims of this study were to (a) determine the influence of the level of hypoxia on a potential reduction of MA at exhaustion; (b) determine the minimum increase in PIO2 needed to enhance muscle activation at exhaustion in hypoxia; and (c) find out if the ergogenic effect of increasing PIO2is always accompanied by enhanced muscle activation, which would be an indication of a predominantly central mechanism. We hypothesized that an increase of PIO2upon exhaustion would rapidly increase MA depending on the level of hypoxia at exhaustion and the inspiratory O2pressure of the breathing gas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Subjects Ten healthy men (age: 21.1 ±2.1 years, height: 173 ±8 cm, body mass: 71 ±9 kg, body fat: 16.6 ±4.5%, VO2max: 50.4 ± 4.7 mL.kg−1.min−1) agreed to participate in this investigation. After being informed about the experiments and the possible risks associated with participation they provided written consent. The study was performed by the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (CEIH-2010-01 and CEIH-2009-01). General Overview This study was a part of a larger project that included several experiments designed to address the mechanisms limiting whole body exercise performance in humans. The results focusing on muscle metabolism and O2transport have been published (Calbet et al., 2015a; Morales-Alamo et al., 2015). Body composition was determined by dual-energy xray absorptiometry (DEXA) (Hologic QDR-1500, Hologic Corp., software version 7.10, Waltham, MA), during the familiarization sessions. The leg muscle mass was calculated from the DEXA scans using the model of Wang et al. (1999). Subjects reported to the laboratory to familiarize with maximal exercise tests in normoxia and normobaric hypoxia (Altitrainer200, SMTEC, Switzerland) on separate days. For experimental purposes, subjects performed two sets of IE tests, here called invasive and deception test. On the first experimental day, all subjects performed the invasive tests as previously described (Calbet et al., 2015a) and on the second and third day, they completed the deception protocol. The exercise tests were carried out on a cycle ergometer (Lode Excalibur Sport 925900, Groningen, The Netherlands) and subjects were instructed to pedal at 80 revolutions per minute (rpm). To facilitate the maintenance of the targeted pedaling cadence, subjects received visual feedback, and verbal instructions when deviations of 5 or more rpm occurred. Exercise Protocol Invasive Experiments Subjects reported to the laboratory at 07.00 after an overnight fast from 22.00 h. After catheterization (see below), subjects were assigned to either an IE test to exhaustion in normoxia (30 W/2 min) or hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg; 20 W/2 min; Altitrainer200, SMTEC, Switzerland), in random order and separated by 90 min rest. Before the start of the IE in hypoxia, subjects were breathing the hypoxic gas for 3 min while they were pedaling 20–40 rpm with the ergometer unloaded. At exhaustion (Exh1), the subjects were rapidly switched to breath room air (normoxia) and requested to continue the exercise at the same load for 2 min, then the load was increased by 20 W every 2 min until exhaustion (Exh2). This was followed by a lunch break (a sandwich and 200 mL of apple or pineapple juice) and a 120 min resting Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 2August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333

Torres-Peralta et al. Oxygenation Effects on Muscle Activation at Fatigue period. Thereafter, the IE in hypoxia was repeated. At Exh1 the subjects were requested to keep pedaling while a valve deviated the inspired flow to a 30 L anesthesia bag pre-filled with hypoxic gas (FIO2= ∼13.3, PIO2= ∼91 mmHg) and a small amount of CO (7 mL·kg−1body mass). The gas was breathed in an open circuit system in a well-ventilated room until the bag was almost emptied. The valve was then returned to the previous position such that the subjects continued the incremental test at this level of hypoxia (FIO2:∼13.3, PIO2:∼91 mmHg). After 2 min at the load eliciting exhaustion, the intensity was increased by 20 W/2 min until a new exhaustion (Exh2). Again, subjects were requested to keep pedaling while they were switched to breath room air (normoxia). After 2 min, the load was increased by 20 W/2 min until exhaustion (Exh3). The invasive experiments were used to study the influence of different levels of oxygenation on the hemodynamic responses and fatigue mechanisms in hypoxia, as reported previously (Calbet et al., 2015a). Deception Protocol (Noninvasive) Subjects performed four IE tests on 2 different days, separated by at least 1 week. A 90 min recovery period was established between the two tests carried out on the same day (Figure 1), as previously done (Calbet et al., 2003a). This resting period is sufficient to allow for a full recovery of peak power output and VO2max, as previously reported (Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2014; Calbet et al., 2015a). Each deception test was composed of an initial phase in severe hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg) (HYP1), followed by a second phase with a similar or a less severe level of hypoxia (HYP2), which continued with a final phase in normoxia (NX3). HYP1 started with an intensity of 60 or 70 W which, after 2 min was increased by 20 or 30 W every 2 min until exhaustion (Exh1). The 70 W starting load and the steps of 30 W were used in one of the subjects who was a welltrained triathlete, so the duration of his test was similar to the duration of the tests performed by the other subjects. Like during the invasive experiments, before the start of the IE in hypoxia, subjects were breathing the hypoxic gas for 3 min while they were pedaling at 20–40 rpm with the ergometer unloaded. At Exh1, the inspired gas mixture was rapidly changed to one of four different gas mixtures [PIO2=73 (placebo), 82, 92, and 99 mmHg, equivalent to 5200, 4400, 3600, and 3100 m above sea level, respectively]. Subjects were told and believed that they were getting normoxic gas at exhaustion. These gas mixtures were administered in random order and with a double-blind design. After 2 min at the load eliciting Exh1, the load was increased by 20 or 30 W every 2 min until exhaustion (Exh2). At Exh2, the gas mixture was rapidly changed to room air (PIO2=142 mmHg) while the subjects were strongly encouraged to continue pedaling. After 2 min at the load eliciting Exh2, the load was increased by 20 or 30 W every 2 min until exhaustion (Exh3). Although the change of PIO2upon exhaustion was intended to be maintained for 2 min before increasing the load, in some instances, for example during the placebo experiments, subjects fatigued before reaching 2 min in the new oxygenation condition. In these cases, the breathing gas mixture was rapidly changed to normoxia, maintained for 2 min in normoxia, and then increased by 20 or 30 W every 2 min until exhaustion. Exhaustion during the IE tests was defined by either the subject stopping pedaling or dropping pedaling rate below 60 rpm during 5 s (or earlier if the cadence was dropping very fast), despite strong verbal encouragement. A 30 L anesthesia bag was prefilled with the target FIO2and used as a buffer in the transition to HYP2, to gain few seconds to adjust the Altitrainer in such a way that the target FIO2was instantaneously administered at the start of the transition. During the first 10–12 s of the transitions the subjects breathed from the anesthesia bag, then a four-way valve was used to direct the inspiratory port to either the Altitrainer or room air. These 10 s (bag breathing) were used to stabilize the Altitrainer at the target FIO2corresponding to each HYP2 phase. FIGURE 1 | Experimental protocol. Each experimental day the subjects performed two incremental exercise tests in random order. The incremental exercise test always began in severe hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg). At exhaustion (Exh1) the breathing gas mixture was swiftly changed to another one with a greater oxygen PO2, except in one instance that the gas administered was the same one the subjects were breathing in severe acute hypoxia, i.e., PIO2=73 mmHg, to create a placebo condition. Subjects were asked to continue the exercise and after 2 min at the load eliciting Exh1, the load was increased by 20 or 30 W/2 min until exhaustion (Exh2). Once again, subjects were asked to keep pedaling while the gas mixture was swiftly changed to normoxia. After 2 min at the load eliciting Exh2, the intensity was increased by 20 or 30 W/2 min until the final exhaustion (Exh 3). Between Exh1 and Exh2, the breathing gas mixtures used corresponded to PIO2of 73, 82, 92, 99, and 142 mmHg (Normoxia) and were administered following a double-blind design. Subjects were asked to pedal close to 80 rpm. However, when approaching exhaustion, the pedaling rate was always reduced. Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 3August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333

Torres-Peralta et al. Oxygenation Effects on Muscle Activation at Fatigue Oxygen Uptake and Hemoglobin Oxygen Saturation Oxygen uptake was measured with a metabolic cart (Vmax N29; Sensormedics, California, USA), calibrated before each test according to the manufacturer instructions. Respiratory variables were analyzed breath-by-breath and averaged every 10 s for the analysis of transitions at exhaustion. Hemoglobin oxygen saturation was estimated with a finger pulse oximeter (SpO2) (OEM III module, 4549-000, Plymouth, MN). Electromyography Electrical MA was monitored using surface electromyography (EMG) (Figure 2). EMG signals were continuously recorded from the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis, as previously reported (Torres-Peralta et al., 2016). Before the application of the EMG electrodes, the skin surface was carefully shaved, and wiped with ethanol to reduce skin impedance. Bipolar single differential electrodes were placed longitudinally on the muscles following the SENIAM recommendations (Merletti and Hermens, 2000) and taped on the skin to minimize movement artifacts. The reference electrode was placed on the skin over the acromion. The position of the electrodes was marked on the skin with indelible ink, and these references were used for precise electrode placement in repeated experiments. The EMG signals were acquired using a 16-channel recording system (Myomonitor IV, Delsys Inc., Boston, MA) at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz using rectangular shaped (19.8 mm wide and 35 mm long) bipolar surface electrodes with 1 ×10 mm 99.9% Ag conductors, and with an inter-conductor distance of 10 mm (DE-2.3 Delsys Inc.). The EMG data were filtered with a highpass filter of 20 Hz and a low-pass filter of 450 Hz using a fifthorder Butterworth filter. The system has an input impedance of >1015per 0.2pF of input capacitance, a common mode rejection ratio of >80 dB, signal-to-noise ratio <1.2 µV, and a pre-amplifier gain 1000 V/V ±1 %. Each pedal revolution was detected using an electrogoniometer (Goniometer Biosignal Sensor S700 Joint Angle Shape Sensor; Delsys Inc. Boston) fixed on the left knee and sampled at 500 Hz. The electrogoniometer was individually calibrated taking as references the knee angles in fully extended and flexed positions. EMG and joint movement were simultaneously recorded by a portable device (Myomonitor IV, Delsys Inc. Boston) and wirelessly transmitted to a computer FIGURE 2 | Power output and EMG. Schematic representation of the power output (upper panels), raw EMG (2nd row), rectified EMG (3th row), and rectified and smoothed EMG (lower panels), during the last 60 s of the control submaximal exercise at 80 W in hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg), the last 10 s of the incremental exercise (IE) in severe hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg), the first 10 s of the transition from a PIO2of 73 to 82 mmHg, the last 10 s of the IE at a PIO2of 82 mmHg, the first 10 s in normoxia and the last 10 s before task failure in normoxia. Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 4August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333

Torres-Peralta et al. Oxygenation Effects on Muscle Activation at Fatigue (EMGWorks Wireless application and EMGWorks Acquisition 3.7.1.3; Delsys, Inc. Boston). The EMG signal corresponding to each muscle contraction was analyzed using code developed “in house” (Matlab R2012b, MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). The EMG recordings were fullwave rectified and smoothed to provide an index of muscle activation; the amplitude characteristics were analyzed via average RMS of a 25-ms moving window for the duration of the contraction burst. Contraction burst onset and offset detection were determined using 20% of the maximal EMGRMS activity of each contraction burst as a reference (Baum and Li, 2003; Hug and Dorel, 2009; Torres-Peralta et al., 2014), rather than a mean threshold value from 15 consecutive contraction bursts (Ozgunen et al., 2010). This approach yielded the same result as direct, simple visual discrimination, with 100% detection of all contraction bursts. Contraction timing was defined as the time elapsed from the knee at is greatest extension to the start of the contraction burst, expressed as a percentage of the full duration of each revolution. The EMGRMS recorded during the last minute of a 2 min 80 W load (in hypoxia, PIO2=73 mmHg) was used to normalize the remaining EMGRMS data. Besides, we defined a total activity index (TAI) as TAI = EMGRMS ×burst duration (ms) ×number of pedal strokes during the period of time analyzed. The total activity index is similar to the integrated EMG signal, but was computed separately for each contraction burst and excluded the baseline EMG between contraction bursts (Torres-Peralta et al., 2014). The TAI recorded during the last minute of a 2 min 80 W load (in hypoxia) was used to normalize the rest of the TAI values. The mean (MPF) and median (MdPF) power spectrum frequencies were calculated using Fast Fourier Transform (Solomonow et al., 1990). All variables were reported as the mean values of the pedal strokes recorded during the last 10 and 30 s of the incremental exercise. EMG data are reported separately for vastus medialis (VM) and lateralis (VL), and also as the average of the two muscles. Calculation of the Improvement in SaO2 during the First 10 s of the Transitions The mean change in SaO2needed to explain the mean improvement in VO2observed during the first 10 s of the transition from hypoxia to higher a PIO2was calculated by solving the Fick equation, using arterial blood gasses and thermodilution cardiac output data obtained in normoxia and hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg) in parallel invasive experiments performed by the same subjects (Calbet et al., 2015a). Since similar levels of peak cardiac output were reached in severe hypoxia and normoxia, it was assumed that the level of cardiac output reached at exhaustion at intermediate PIO2 levels (i.e., 82, 92, and 99 mmHg) must have been similar to that measured in normoxia. It was also assumed that cardiac output remained unchanged during the first 10 s of the transition, given the stability of heart rate during the transitions and the high dependency of cardiac output on the absolute exercise intensity (Calbet and Lundby, 2009; Calbet et al., 2009a, 2015b), which remained unchanged during the first 10 s of the transition. Statistics Normal distribution of variables was checked using the Shapiro-Wilks test. Since variables were normally distributed, differences between tests at Exh1 were determined using oneway repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Mauchly’s test of sphericity was run before the ANOVA and in the case of violation of the sphericity assumption the degrees of freedom were adjusted according to the Huynh and Feldt test. Pairwise comparisons at specific time points were performed with Student’s paired t-tests and adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Holm–Bonferroni method. Since no significant differences were observed at exhaustion between the four tests in severe hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg), these four tests were averaged to obtain a representative value for exhaustion at a PIO2of 73 mmHg. The same procedure was used to test for differences between the four IE tests ending in normoxia (Exh3). Similar results were obtained in the four tests at exhaustion in normoxia (Exh3) and hence, the values obtained in these four tests were also averaged to generate a single value representing normoxia. These two averages were compared with Student’s paired t-tests. The effect of increasing PIO2at exhaustion on all dependent variables was assessed using a twoway ANOVA for repeated measures with two factors: breathing gas (two levels: prevs. post-switch to the new breathing gas) and PIO2(four levels), followed by pairwise comparisons using Student’s paired t-tests adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Holm–Bonferroni method. The relationships between changes in PIO2and the changes in the dependent variables were tested using linear regression analysis. To compare the first 10 s of the transition between the first and the second transition, an average value for the four conditions of each transition was calculated. This generated a single value per subject for the first and another unique value per subject for the second transition. The two transitions were compared with a paired Student’s ttest. Values are reported as the mean ±standard deviation (unless otherwise stated). P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v.15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and Excel 2011 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). RESULTS Maximal Exercise in Severe Acute Hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg) and Normoxia (PIO2= 142 mmHg) As shown in Table 1, SpO2, power output at exhaustion (Wmax), VO2peak, pulmonary ventilation at exhaustion (VE), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate at exhaustion (HR), end-tidal O2pressure (PETO2), end-tidal CO2pressure (PETCO2), and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) were lower during the last 30 s of exercise in severe hypoxia than in normoxia, while the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was higher in hypoxia than in normoxia (all P ≤0.05). Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 5August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333

Torres-Peralta et al. Oxygenation Effects on Muscle Activation at Fatigue TABLE 1 | Ergospirometric and electromyographic responses during the last 30 s of the incremental exercise to exhaustion in normoxia (PIO2≈ 142 mmHg) and severe hypoxia (PIO2≈73 mmHg). Hypoxia (PIO2=Normoxia P 73 mmHg) FIO2(%) 10.8 ±0.07 20.8 ±0.04 <0.001 SpO2(%) 63.8 ±5.7 92.8 ±3.1 <0.001 Wmax (W) 170.5 ±17.9 213 ±19.7 <0.001 VO2peak (L.min−1) 2.28 ±0.19 3.44 ±0.43 <0.001 VE(L.min−1) 115.2 ±18.6 124.8 ±15.6 <0.001 RR (breaths.min−1) 50.6 ±7.0 55.9 ±7.1 <0.001 HR (beats.min−1) 179.0 ±8.4 184.8 ±5.2 <0.001 PET O2(mmHg) 51.3 ±2.3 108.2 ±7.4 <0.001 PET CO2(mmHg) 28.1 ±2.5 30.8 ±3.1 <0.001 RER 1.34 ±0.13 1.05 ±0.06 <0.001 VCO2(L.min−1) 3.06 ±0.36 3.55 ±0.41 <0.001 RPM 71.9 ±4.1 68.4 ±4.2 0.08 VM RMSraw (µV) 111.2 ±38.6 128.3 ±42.4 <0.01 VL RMSraw (µV) 97.5 ±30.8 110.4 ±28.0 <0.01 Average RMSraw (µV) 104.4 ±29.0 119.4 ±28.8 <0.005 VM RMSNz (A.U.) 178.1 ±35.2 209.2 ±58.4 <0.05 VL RMSNz (A.U.) 173.3 ±35.4 200.0 ±49.1 <0.005 Average RMSNz (A.U.) 175.4 ±31.2 204.6 ±50.3 <0.01 VM TAINz (A.U.) 111.5 ±33.5 138.7 ±47.8 <0.005 VL TAINz (A.U.) 97.3 ±21.0 117.4 ±22.7 <0.001 Average TAINz (A.U.) 102.9 ±25.5 126.7 ±30.9 <0.001 VM MPF (Hz) 89.8 ±16.9 85.2 ±16.6 <0.001 VL MPF (Hz) 89.6 ±16.5 85.5 ±17.1 <0.001 Average MPF (Hz) 89.7 ±16.7 85.4 ±16.9 <0.001 VM MdPF (Hz) 71.3 ±12.1 69.2 ±11.8 0.06 VL MdPF (Hz) 70.6 ±12.1 68.9 ±12.2 0.06 Average MdPF (Hz) 70.9 ±12.1 69.0 ±12.0 0.06 VM Burst (ms) 305.4 ±51.5 334.3 ±34.8 <0.05 VL Burst (ms) 283.0 ±34.5 306.2 ±26.7 <0.05 Average Burst (ms) 294.2 ±42.1 320.2 ±29.6 <0.05 FIO2, inspiratory oxygen fraction; SpO2, hemoglobin saturation in capillary blood measured by pulse oximetry; Wmax, power output at exhaustion; VO2, oxygen consumption; VE, pulmonary ventilation; RR, respiratory rate; HR, heart rate; PET O2, endtidal O2pressure; PET CO2, end-tidal CO2pressure; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; VCO2, CO2production; RPM, revolutions per minute; VL, vastus lateralis; VM, vastus medialis; RMSraw, raw root mean square; RMSNz, normalized root mean square; TAINz, normalized total activation index (arbitrary units, A.U.); MPF, mean power frequency; MdPF, median power frequency; Burst, contraction burst duration. n =10. Muscle activation, as reflected by VM and VL raw and normalized RMS, total activation index and contraction burst duration was 8–20% lower in hypoxia than normoxia (P<0.05) (Table 1). In contrast, MPF was 5% lower in normoxia than hypoxia (P<0.001) and a similar trend was observed for MdPF (Table 1). Effect of Increased PIO2on cardiorespiratory and EMG Variables Increased PIO2allowed for the continuation of exercise during 41.9 ±19.8, 60.7 ±30.2, 72.9 ±52.0, and 170.5 ±70.8 s for the transition from a PIO2of 73 mmHg to placebo, 82, 92, and 99 mmHg, respectively, (all P<0.05, compared to the end exercise in severe acute hypoxia). There was a linear relationship between the duration of the new oxygenation phases and the increase of PIO2(time (s) =35.1+4.86·1PIO2;R2=0.955, P <0.001, n=8), where 1PIO2represents the increase in PIO2in mmHg (Figure 3A). A similar relationship was obtained between endurance time and the estimated improvement in SaO2(time (s) =21.1+9.17·1SaO2;R2=0.973, P<0.001, n=8) (Figure 3B). Compared to the mean values observed during the last 10 s of exercise in severe hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg), PETO2, and VO2were increased, and RER reduced during the first 10 s following the increase in oxygenation (Tables 2 and 3). SpO2was only significantly increased in transitions to normoxia (Table 3), in part due to the slow response time of the pulse oximeter. These effects were more accentuated the greater the difference in PIO2between the hypoxic and the increased PIO2 condition. Transition from Severe Hypoxia (PIO2of 73 mmHg) to Higher Levels of PIO2 VL and VM RMSraw, RMSNz and TAINz were all enhanced by increasing the PIO2at exhaustion (ANOVA main breathing gas effect P<0.05) (Table 2). VM and VL RMSraw, as well as the VM-VL average RMSraw, were increased by 5–10% when the PIO2was raised from 73 to 92, or 99 mmHg (Table 2). VL RMSraw and the VM-VL average RMSraw were also increased when the PIO2was raised from 73 to 142 mmHg (Table 3). MPF and MdPF remained at the same level with the increase of PIO2. Transition to Normoxia As depicted in Table 3, increasing PIO2from different hypoxia conditions to normoxia was also associated to increased VM and VL RMSraw and RMSNz, as well at VM TAINz and VMVL Average TAINz (ANOVA breathing gas main effect P< 0.05) (Table 3). When the data from the two conditions with greater levels of hypoxia (PIO2of 73 and 82 mmHg) were averaged, increasing PIO2at exhaustion to normoxia significantly increased MA (RMSraw and RMSNz) and the normalized TAI (P<0.05). However, this was not the case when the data from the less hypoxic conditions (PIO2of 92 and 99 mmHg) were averaged, for which the transition to higher PIO2did not result in significantly greater muscle activation. In general, MPF and MdPF remained at the same level or changed slightly with the transition to an increased PIO2. We also analyzed the 10 s comprised between the 5th and the 15th second after the start of the transition and compared these 10 s with the last 10 s of the preceding exercise phase. The results of this analysis were essentially similar to those described above, i.e., increasing PIO2at exhaustion resulted in increased MA (RMSraw and RMSNz), particularly when fatigue occurred at high levels of hypoxia (PIO2of 73 and 82 mmHg). In general, the pedaling rate was augmented with increased oxygenation at the transition from different levels of hypoxia to normoxia, and consequently, the duration of the contraction bursts was reduced (Table 3). At the same time, the start of the Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 6August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333

Torres-Peralta et al. Oxygenation Effects on Muscle Activation at Fatigue FIGURE 3 | Relationship between the duration of new oxygenation phases with: (A) the increase of PIO2(1PIO2) and (B) the estimated improvement in arterial saturation (1SaO2). Green circles: transitions from severe hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg) to placebo (vertical arrow) and moderate hypoxia; red circles: transitions from different levels of hypoxia (PIO2of 73, 82, 92, and 99 mmHg) to normoxia. Each point corresponds to the mean of 10 subjects. contraction bursts occurred slightly earlier with an increase in oxygenation from a PIO2of 73 mmHg to normoxia. The First Transition Compared with the Second Transition In the first transition, the PIO2was increased from severe hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg) to less hypoxic levels, while during the second transition the PIO2was increased from different levels of hypoxia to normoxia. We calculated a mean value for the four PIO2conditions of the first transition and compared it with the mean value calculated using the four conditions of the second transition, including in the analysis only the breath-bybreath data collected during the first 10 s of each transition. The mean PIO2during the first and second transition was 84.3 ±2.1, and 137.5 ±3.0 mmHg, respectively, (P<0.001); while SpO2was 64.1 ±4.8 and 72.0 ±4.7%, respectively, (P <0.001). The mean exercise intensity at which the first and second transitions occurred was 170.5 ±17.9 and 173.5 ±16.3 W (P=0.08). The mean response of heart rate, pulmonary ventilation, respiratory rate and tidal volume were similar in both transitions (Figures 4A–D, respectively). In contrast, the PETCO2, PETO2, VO2, and VCO2were higher during the second transition (Figures 4E–H, respectively). Muscle activation was 6% higher during second compared to the first transition, as reflected by the VM, VL, and VM-VL average RMSraw values (P<0.05) (Figure 5A). Similar results were obtained for the VM and VM-VL average RMSNz, which were 8 and 7% higher during the second compared to the first transition, respectively (P<0.05) (Figure 5B). The VM, VL, and VM-VL average TAINz values were 8-10% higher during the second than the first transition (P<0.05) (Figure 5C). VM, VL, and VM-VL average mean and median power frequencies were 4–6% lower during the second than the first transition (P <0.001) (Figures 5D and E). The start of the burst occurred slightly earlier in the pedaling cycle during the second compared to the first transition for the VM and VM-VL average values, respectively, (P<0.05) (Figure 5F). The duration of the burst and the mean pedaling rates were similar during both transitions (P>0.56) (Figures 5G and H). Importance of the Magnitude of the Change in PIO2and the Pre-existing Level of Hypoxia on the Response to an Increase in PIO2 As reflected in Figure 6, the changes of PETO2, VO2, the duration of the bursts and pedaling rate (PR) were linearly related to the increase in PIO2as shown in the equations: 1VO2=0.0277 ·1PIO2−0.0514(R2=0.990; P<0.001;n=8);Equation 1, (Figure 6A) 1PETO2=0.654 ·1PIO2−0.852(R2=0.997; P<0.001;n=8);Equation 2, (Figure 6B) 1BD =16.33 −1.127 ·1PIO2(R2=0.941; P<0.001;n=8);Equation 3, (Figure 6E) 1PR =0.082 −1.122 ·1PIO2(R2=0.917; P<0.001;n=8);Equation 4, (Figure 6F) Where 1VO2is expressed in L·min−1;1PETO2and 1PIO2in mmHg; BD in ms, and PR in rpm. The VM-VL average RMSraw was linearly related to the increase in PIO2, but only in the transitions from a PIO2of 73 mmHg to a higher PIO2[1RMSraw (µV) =1.945 + 0.449 ·1PIO2(R2=0.915; P<0.05, n=4)] (Figure 6C). This relationship was lost after normalization of the RMS (Figure 6D). Placebo Effects In the placebo transition, subjects believed that they were receiving normoxia upon exhaustion in severe hypoxia; however, they were maintained at the same level of hypoxia. No significant changes were observed in MA (RMSNz and TAINz) as a consequence of this placebo treatment (Table 2). Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 7August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333

Torres-Peralta et al. Oxygenation Effects on Muscle Activation at Fatigue TABLE 2 | Cardiorespiratory responses during the last 10 s of an incremental exercise to exhaustion in severe hypoxia (PIO2=73 mmHg) and during the first 10 s of oxygenation with different gas mixtures. Exhaustion Start of Exhaustion Start of Exhaustion Start of Exhaustion Start of PIO2=73 PIO2=99 PIO2=73 PIO2=92 PIO2=73 PIO2=82 PIO2=73 PIO2=73 mmHg mmHg mmHg mmHg mmHg mmHg mmHg mmHg FIO2(%) 10.78 ±0.10 13.92 ±0.23c10.82 ±0.12 12.45 ±0.75c10.78 ±0.06 12.01 ±0.25c10.79 ±0.08 10.79 ±0.20¶§‡ SpO2(%) 62.4 ±5.2 63.1 ±5.5 64.3 ±5.5 65.1 ±5.7 63.5 ±5.8 63.6 ±5.9 64.7 ±4.9 64.4 ±5.7‡ Wmax (W) 172.0 ±23.5 172.0 ±23.5 170.0 ±21.6 170.0 ±21.6 168.0 ±16.9 168.0 ±16.9 172.0 ±21.5 172.0 ±21.5 VO2peak (L.min−1) 2.32 ±0.17 2.81 ±0.46b2.23 ±0.25 2.53 ±0.34a2.33 ±0.15 2.45 ±0.27T2.27 ±0.29 2.29 ±0.32¶§‡ VE(L.min−1) 118.2 ±23.7 111.8 ±20.8 114.8 ±26.3 116.8 ±22.6 117.5 ±16.4 116.4 ±15.1 114.8 ±14.7 116.8 ±15.6 RR (breaths.min−1) 51.7 ±9.2 48.1 ±7.2 51.3 ±8.5 50.7 ±8.2 51.5 ±8.4 51.1 ±7.6 51.3 ±7.0 52.3 ±7.7 HR (beats.min−1) 179.0 ±10.2 179.3 ±10.1 180.5 ±8.2 181.0 ±7.4 177.3 ±7.4 177.5 ±7.2 180.6 ±7.9 180.8 ±8.3¶ PET O2(mmHg) 51.4 ±3.0 62.9 ±5.1c51.7 ±3.1 58.1 ±6.3c51.4 ±2.9 56.1 ±3.9c51.6 ±2.0 51.9 ±2.0¶§‡ PET CO2(mmHg) 27.3 ±2.9 27.3 ±4.3 28.3 ±2.9 28.4 ±2.7 27.4 ±3.7 27.6 ±3.0 28.5 ±2.3 28.2 ±2.4 RER 1.32 ±0.17 1.16 ±0.15T1.36 ±0.15 1.28 ±0.13 1.32 ±0.15 1.28 ±0.15 1.36 ±0.14 1.37 ±0.17§ VCO2(L.min−1) 3.06 ±0.42 3.01 ±0.44 3.03 ±0.48 3.12 ±0.41 3.07 ±0.29 3.06 ±0.28 3.08 ±0.41 3.11 ±0.39 RPM 63.6 ±9.4 66.3 ±10.3 68.5 ±7.0 71.3 ±11.4 67.1 ±9.5 68.2 ±12.0 71.2 ±7.8 70.0 ±9.3 VM RMSraw (µV) 105.9 ±37.2 119.3 ±43.5c106.3 ±42.6 112.2 ±38.1a113.5 ±42.7 120.6 ±50.2T97.2 ±43.0 99.7 ±42.6¶‡ VL RMSraw (µV) 108.8 ±38.4 119.1 ±39.9c97.3 ±48.9 102.0 ±49.2a115.8 ±49.9 114.1 ±45.1 85.9 ±35.5 87.4 ±40.6¶ Average RMSraw (µV) 107.4 ±29.1 119.2 ±33.4c101.8 ±41.5 107.1 ±39.1b114.7 ±39.2 117.3 ±40.6 91.5 ±34.9 93.6 ±38.0¶‡ VM RMSNz (A.U.) 176.2 ±48.1 195.8 ±56.9c178.0 ±58.4 191.2 ±57.2a180.9 ±50.4 187.6 ±41.7 164.8 ±67.2 168.6 ±64.2¶ VL RMSNz (A.U.) 182.5 ±55.5 199.6 ±52.2c160.2 ±38.8 171.1 ±35.5a189.6 ±67.0 185.6 ±45.4 151.7 ±49.2 152.3 ±51.7¶‡ Average RMSNz (A.U.) 179.4 ±49.8 197.7 ±52.5c169.1 ±47.0 181.2 ±45.0a185.2 ±56.4 186.6 ±40.2 158.2 ±56.8 160.5 ±56.9¶‡ VM TAINz (A.U.) 39.6 ±17.6 44.5 ±19.5b35.6 ±14.8 38.0 ±12.5 37.1 ±14.1 37.6 ±11.1 33.5 ±13.3 35.5 ±14.1¶ VL TAINz (A.U.) 36.8 ±13.5 41.2 ±14.4c30.2 ±9.7 32.8 ±7.1 37.1 ±12.6 35.8 ±8.7 29.3 ±8.8 31.6 ±14.0¶ Average TAINz (A.U.) 38.2 ±15.4 42.8 ±16.9c32.9 ±11.8 35.4 ±9.5 37.1 ±13.2 36.7 ±9.6 31.4 ±10.6 33.6 ±13.3¶ VM MPF (Hz) 96.0 ±24.8 95.1 ±24.2 89.2 ±22.8 91.5 ±23.9 91.2 ±17.3 89.8 ±15.0 84.9 ±15.5 83.6 ±13.8 VL MPF (Hz) 97.0 ±27.0 96.0 ±27.5 88.9 ±22.6 90.2 ±23.2 91.2 ±17.3 89.5 ±15.5 84.9 ±15.9 83.5 ±14.4 Average MPF (Hz) 96.5 ±25.9 95.5 ±25.7 89.1 ±22.7 90.9 ±23.5 91.2 ±17.3 89.6 ±15.3 84.9 ±15.7 83.5 ±14.1 VM MdPF (Hz) 76.3 ±17.1 76.9 ±17.1 70.3 ±15.7 72.7 ±14.7 70.8 ±13.2 71.8 ±11.6 66.9 ±10.3 66.2 ±10.5 VL MdPF (Hz) 77.8 ±19.7 77.6 ±20.0 69.8 ±15.9 70.9 ±15.0 70.7 ±13.2 71.4 ±12.0 66.4 ±10.8 65.6 ±10.2 Average MdPF (Hz) 77.0 ±18.3 77.3 ±18.4 70.0 ±15.8 71.8 ±14.7 70.8 ±13.2 71.6 ±11.7 66.7 ±10.5 65.9 ±10.3§ VM Burst (ms) 361.5 ±110.1 349.9 ±85.9 310.7 ±88.3 305.1 ±81.2 310.3 ±62.5 304.9 ±94.7 309.3 ±80.7 318.2 ±74.7 VL Burst (ms) 343.2 ±91.7 324.8 ±81.7 297.8 ±55.6 300.1 ±70.7 310.2 ±59.7 303.9 ±91.5 300.0 ±63.7 316.5 ±86.6 Average Burst (ms) 352.4 ±95.3 337.3 ±79.0 304.3 ±71.3 302.6 ±75.4 310.2 ±60.8 304.4 ±93.0 304.7 ±71.0 317.4 ±76.5 VM Timing (%) 48.8 ±3.8 47.6 ±4.2a49.4 ±2.5 49.1 ±3.2 49.4 ±2.3 49.3 ±2.9 47.9 ±3.9 48.3 ±4.2‡ VL Timing (%) 50.7 ±2.1 50.0 ±2.3 50.2 ±2.3 49.9 ±2.5 50.3 ±2.1 50.3 ±2.4 49.5 ±2.9 49.6 ±3.0 Average Timing (%) 49.7 ±2.6 48.8 ±2.7 49.8 ±2.3 49.5 ±2.7 49.8 ±2.2 49.8 ±2.6 48.7 ±3.4 49.0 ±3.5 FIO2, inspiratory oxygen fraction; SpO2, hemoglobin saturation in capillary blood measured by pulse oximetry; Wmax, power output at exhaustion; VO2, oxygen consumption; VE, pulmonary ventilation; RR, respiratory rate; HR, heart rate; PET O2, end-tidal O2pressure; PET CO2, end-tidal CO2pressure; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; VCO2, CO2production; RPM, revolutions per minute; VL, vastus lateralis; VM, vastus medialis; RMSraw, raw root mean square; RMSNz, normalized root mean square; TAINz: normalized total activation index (arbitrary units, A.U.); MPF, mean power frequency; MdPF, median power frequency; Burst, contraction burst duration; Timing: start of activation expressed as percentage of total revolution duration. aP<0.05; bP<0.01; cP<0.001; and TP<0.1 (FIO2=73 mmHg vs. new gas mixture). ¶P<0.05 ANOVA breathing gas switch main effect; §P<0.05 ANOVA oxygenation level main effect; ‡P<0.05 ANOVA breathing gas switch x oxygenation level interaction; n =10. DISCUSSION This study shows that MA during the last 10–30 s of an IE to exhaustion is lower in SAH than in normoxia, while at exhaustion in moderate hypoxia MA was similar to that observed at exhaustion in normoxia. We have shown that during exercise at different levels of hypoxia, increasing PIO2at exhaustion with normoxic or less hypoxic gas mixtures rapidly relieves fatigue and allows for the continuation of exercise. This effect is accompanied by increased MA only when the level of hypoxia during the exercise eliciting exhaustion was severe (PIO2of 73 mmHg, equivalent to an altitude close to 5200 m) and the PIO2 was increased to 92 mmHg or higher and the estimated SaO2 to 70% or higher. Nevertheless, the close linear relationship between the increase in MA (average of VM and VL RMSraw) and the increase in PIO2(Figure 6C) indicates that during exercise in SAH any small increase in PIO2could have a positive effect on muscle activation. This is also supported by the fact that during the first 10 s of the transitions, MA was higher during the second than the first transition, despite the fact Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 8August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333

Torres-Peralta et al. Oxygenation Effects on Muscle Activation at Fatigue TABLE 3 | Cardiorespiratory responses during the last 10 s of an incremental exercise to exhaustion in different levels of hypoxia (PIO2=73, 82, 92, and 99 mmHg) and during the first 10 s of oxygenation to normoxia (PIO2=142 mmHg). Exhaustion Start of Exhaustion Start of Exhaustion Start of Exhaustion Start of PIO2=99 Normoxia PIO2=92 Normoxia PIO2=82 Normoxia PIO2=73 Normoxia mmHg mmHg mmHg mmHg FIO2(%) 14.42 ±0.12 20.26 ±0.46c13.41 ±0.39 19.99 ±0.53c11.98 ±0.21 19.90 ±0.62c10.91 ±0.44 20.02 ±0.74c¶§‡ SpO2(%) 78.2 ±4.1 80.2 ±5.3a70.4 ±6.7 73.4 ±6.8c67.6 ±4.5 68.2 ±4.2b64.7 ±4.8 66.3 ±6.20a¶§‡ Wmax (W) 180.0 ±21.1 180.0 ±21.1 172.0 ±19.3 172.0 ±19.3 170.0 ±17.0 170.0 ±17.0 172.0 ±21.5 172.0 ±21.5 VO2peak (L.min−1) 2.93 ±0.25 3.89 ±0.68b2.87 ±0.28 4.15 ±0.45c2.48 ±0.32 3.99 ±0.52c2.37 ±0.30 4.05 ±0.59c¶§‡ VE(L.min−1) 119.9 ±18.1 116.1 ±25.6 118.6 ±19.0 117.3 ±16.7 110.8 ±24.5 109.5 ±17.8 117.6 ±17.5 113.6 ±21.2 RR (breaths.min−1) 53.5 ±7.1 51.2 ±5.7 53.2 ±7.0 52.6 ±6.0 49.6 ±8.6 49.5 ±5.6 52.7 ±7.2 52.2 ±7.7 HR (beats.min−1) 182.2 ±7.9 182.1 ±8.7 182.7 ±6.2 182.9 ±6.2 178.6 ±7.0 178.5 ±6.5 180.9 ±7.9 180.5 ±7.9 PET O2(mmHg) 71.3 ±2.6 96.4 ±9.9c64.4 ±3.1 90.6 ±13.4c56.7 ±3.4 91.4 ±12.2c51.8 ±2.1 92.3 ±11.5c¶§‡ PET CO2(mmHg) 29.0 ±2.9 30.5 ±3.0a29.0 ±2.9 30.1 ±2.5a28.7 ±3.6 29.5 ±3.5a28.3 ±2.4 30.2 ±2.7a RER 1.13 ±0.08 0.92 ±0.10c1.12 ±0.08 0.87 ±0.12c1.21 ±0.11 0.84 ±0.10c1.35 ±0.14 0.90 ±0.15c¶§‡ VCO2(L.min−1) 3.28 ±0.28 3.29 ±0.51 3.21 ±0.34 3.25 ±0.29 3.00 ±0.47 3.02 ±0.37 3.13 ±0.40 3.16 ±0.41§ RPM 61.7 ±9.0 67.0 ±12.5 63.8 ±11.4 69.5 ±10.2b61.9 ±11.3 68.1 ±9.4T58.3 ±12.6 65.6 ±13.9T¶ VM RMSraw (µV) 116.9 ±45.3 122.7 ±46.6 120.2 ±42.5 119.8 ±39.2 120.1 ±49.4 125.3 ±47.6 102.6 ±47.0 108.4 ±44.3 VL RMSraw (µV) 116.5 ±38.1 123.6 ±43.3 107.3 ±52.5 110.8 ±52.6 118.4 ±50.2 122.7 ±52.9 87.2 ±36.1 94.5 ±37.0b¶ Average RMSraw (µV) 116.7 ±32.5 123.2 ±35.9 113.8 ±42.6 115.3 ±40.3 119.3 ±41.6 124.0 ±43.1 94.9 ±37.5 101.5 ±36.3a¶ VM RMSNz (A.U.) 182.1 ±53.9 191.7 ±57.8 204.3 ±70.8 205.8 ±68.7 189.5 ±57.3 197.9 ±51.7 172.9 ±70.7 184.7 ±77.1¶ VL RMSNz (A.U.) 195.4 ±52.6 206.8 ±66.6 177.8 ±41.3 183.4 ±43.3 194.5 ±70.0 199.4 ±57.5 155.9 ±55.7 167.3 ±53.4a¶ Average RMSNz (A.U.) 188.7 ±43.9 199.2 ±52.7 191.1 ±53.8 194.6 ±50.8 192.0 ±61.4 198.6 ±51.6 164.4 ±62.0 176.0 ±63.9¶ VM TAINz (A.U.) 39.9 ±15.7 43.6 ±16.2T42.8 ±19.2 40.6 ±11.2 42.1 ±17.0 42.6 ±14.5 36.1 ±14.4 38.0 ±16.4¶ VL TAINz (A.U.) 43.2 ±19.3 42.4 ±14.4 34.1 ±9.0 35.3 ±7.2 40.5 ±15.2 40.9 ±12.8 32.5 ±13.8 34.1 ±15.6 Average TAINz (A.U.) 41.5 ±17.1 43.0 ±15.1 38.4 ±13.4 37.9 ±8.4 41.3 ±15.9 41.7 ±13.5 34.3 ±13.5 36.0 ±15.5¶ VM MPF (Hz) 87.4 ±20.1 84.9 ±20.6 84.7 ±20.2 86.0 ±21.0 88.5 ±14.6 87.0 ±16.6 81.8 ±15.2 81.7 ±16.4 VL MPF (Hz) 71.4 ±15.8 85.3 ±21.9c85.7 ±19.4 85.6 ±21.8 88.1 ±15.0 86.3 ±16.9 81.9 ±15.5 82.1 ±16.1¶‡ Average MPF (Hz) 79.4 ±17.8 85.1 ±21.2b85.2 ±19.8 85.8 ±21.4 88.3 ±14.8 86.6 ±16.7 81.8 ±15.3 81.9 ±16.2‡ VM MdPF (Hz) 70.9 ±16.2 69.9 ±16.2 67.5 ±13.6 68.7 ±15.2 72.1 ±11.8 70.3 ±12.2 65.0 ±10.6 66.1 ±13.2 VL MdPF (Hz) 71.4 ±15.8 68.8 ±16.6a67.9 ±13.6 68.1 ±16.2 71.4 ±12.1 69.2 ±12.7 65.5 ±11.0 65.9 ±12.5 Average MdPF (Hz) 71.1 ±16.0 69.3 ±16.4 67.7 ±13.6 68.4 ±15.6 71.8 ±11.8 69.8 ±12.3 65.3 ±10.8 66.0 ±12.8 VM Burst (ms) 375.6 ±127.2 363.0 ±130.0 377.9 ±196.2 317.6 ±83.8 372.8 ±102.7 322.0 ±73.8a367.5 ±85.1 319.2 ±72.1a¶ VL Burst (ms) 381.7 ±120.6 321.3 ±83.7a343.6 ±109.4 309.1 ±73.1T366.7 ±107.3 315.0 ±72.4T371.4 ±97.1 309.3 ±60.0a¶ Average Burst (ms) 378.6 ±113.0 342.2 ±92.2T360.8 ±150.4 313.3 ±77.6 369.8 ±104.6 318.5 ±58.9a369.5 ±88.6 314.2 ±63.9a¶ VM Timing (%) 49.1 ±3.4 46.3 ±7.7 48.2 ±3.5 48.1 ±4.4 48.6 ±3.0 47.8 ±3.6 49.4 ±3.4 47.4 ±4.3a¶ VL Timing (%) 49.5 ±3.6 50.2 ±2.2 49.4 ±2.5 49.7 ±2.1 50.4 ±1.6 49.4 ±2.4 50.5 ±2.3 49.4 ±2.8 Average Timing (%) 49.3 ±3.0 48.3 ±4.2 48.8 ±2.7 48.9 ±3.0 49.5 ±2.1 48.6 ±2.8T50.0 ±2.8 48.4 ±3.4a¶ FIO2, inspiratory oxygen fraction; SpO2, hemoglobin saturation in capillary blood measured by pulse oximetry; Wmax, power output at exhaustion; VO2, oxygen consumption; VE, pulmonary ventilation; RR, respiratory rate; HR, heart rate; PET O2, end-tidal O2pressure; PET CO2, end-tidal CO2pressure; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; VCO2,CO2production; RPM, revolutions per minute; VL, vastus lateralis; VM, vastus medialis; RMSraw, raw root mean square; RMSNz, normalized root mean square; TAINz: normalized total activation index (arbitrary units, A.U.); MPF, mean power frequency; MdPF, median power frequency; Burst: contraction burst duration; Timing, start of activation expressed as percentage of total revolution duration. aP<0.05; bP<0.01; cP<0.001; and TP<0.1 (FIO2=73 mmHg vs. new gas mixture). ¶P<0.05 ANOVA breathing gas switch main effect; §P<0.05 ANOVA oxygenation level main effect; ‡P<0.05 ANOVA breathing gas switch x oxygenation level interaction: n =10. that both transitions occurred at comparable exercise intensities. Moreover, our investigation has also demonstrated that an increase in MA after the increase of PIO2at fatigue in hypoxia is not indispensable for the ergogenic effects elicited by the increase of PIO2. Collectively, our results suggest that severe hypoxia depresses the capacity of the central nervous system to activate the musculature during whole-body exercise to exhaustion, by a mechanism that can be swiftly reversed by increasing the PIO2. Severe Hypoxia Reduces the Level of Muscle Activation Attainable during Incremental Exercise to Exhaustion In support of a central predominance of task failure mechanisms is the rapid relief of fatigue with the increase of PIO2, e.g., when subjects at exhaustion are asked to continue the exercise once the hypoxic gas mixture they are breathing is swiftly switched to normoxic room air (Calbet et al., 2003a) or hyperoxic gas (Amann et al., 2007). This concurs with the demonstration of a Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 9August 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 333