scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

The immunogenic potential of bacterial flagella for Salmonella-mediated tumor therapy.

Abstract

Genetically engineered Salmonella Typhimurium are potent vectors for prophylactic and therapeutic measures against pathogens as well as cancer. This is based on the potent adjuvanticity that supports strong immune responses. The physiology of Salmonella is well understood. It simplifies engineering of both enhanced immune‐stimulatory properties as well as safety features, thus, resulting in an appropriate balance between attenuation and efficacy for clinical applications. A major virulence factor of Salmonella is the flagellum. It is also a strong pathogen‐associated molecular pattern recognized by extra‐ and intracellular receptors of immune cells of the host. At the same time, it represents a serious metabolic burden. Accordingly, the bacteria evolved tight regulatory mechanisms that control flagella synthesis in vivo. Here, we systematically investigated the immunogenicity and adjuvant properties of various flagella mutants of Salmonella in vitro and in a mouse cancer model in vivo. We found that mutants lacking the flagellum‐specific ATPase FliHIJ or the inner membrane ring FliF displayed the greatest stimulatory capacity and strongest anti‐tumor effects, while remaining safe in vivo. Scanning electron microscopy revealed the presence of outer membrane vesicles in the ΔfliF and ΔfliHIJ mutants. Finally, the combination of the ΔfliF and ΔfliHIJ mutations with our previously described attenuated and immunogenic background strain SF102 displayed strong efficacy against the highly resistant cancer cell line RenCa. We thus conclude that manipulating flagella biosynthesis has great potential for the construction of highly efficacious and versatile Salmonella vector strains.

Read accessible full text

The immunogenic potential of bacterial flagella for Salmonella-mediated tumor therapy.

Author: Felgner, Sebastian,Spöring, Imke,Pawar, Vinay,Kocijancic, Dino,Preusse, Matthias,Falk, Christine,Rohde, Manfred,Häussler, Susanne,Weiss, Siegfried,Erhardt, Marc
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Year: 2019
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32807
Source: https://repository.helmholtz-hzi.de/bitstream/10033/622064/1/Felgner%20et%20al.pdf
The immunogenic po en ial o bac e ial lagella o Salmonella-media ed
umo he apy
Sebas ian Felgne 1,2,#, Imke Spö ing1, Vinay Pawa 2,4, Dino Kocijancic5, Ma hias P eusse2,
Ch is ine Falk3, Man ed Rohde4, Susanne Häussle 2, Sieg ied Weiss5,&, Ma c E ha d 1,6,&
1 In ec ion Biology o Salmonella, Helmhol z Cen e o In ec ion Resea ch, B aunschweig, Ge many
2 Depa men o Molecula Bac e iology, Helmhol z Cen e o In ec ion Resea ch, B aunschweig, Ge many
3 Ins i u e o T ansplan Immunology, Medical School Hanno e , Hanno e , Ge many
4 Cen al Facili ies o Mic oscopy, Helmhol z Cen e o In ec ion Resea ch, B aunschweig, Ge many
5 Ins i u e o Immunology, Medical School Hanno e , Hanno e , Ge many
6 Ins i u e o Bac e ial Physiology, Humbold Uni e si y, Be lin, Ge many
NOVELTY AND IMPACT: Balancing sa e y and he apeu ic e icacy emains a majo challenge o he
a ional design o bac e ia o immuno he apy applica ions. We demons a ed ha manipula ing he
spa io empo al egula ion o lagella syn hesis can con e his balance in Salmonella. Unexpec edly,
ab oga ing lagella syn hesis a an ea ly s age esul ed in ou e memb ane esicle o ma ion, which
enhanced he immunogenic p ope ies. These enginee ed Salmonella s ains migh ha e he
po en ial o se e as ec o pla o m o a ious he apies anging om immuniza ion o cance
he apy.
KEYWORDS: Salmonella Typhimu ium, hos -pa hogen in e ac ion, lagella, luminex, bac e ia-
media ed umo he apy
ARTICLE CATEGORY: Cance he apy and p e en ion
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
This a icle has been accep ed o publica ion and unde gone ull pee e iew bu has
no been h ough he copyedi ing, ypese ing, pagina ion and p oo eading p ocess
which may lead o di e ences be ween his e sion and he Ve sion o Reco d. Please
ci e his a icle as doi: 10.1002/ijc.32807
2
# Add ess co espondence o Sebas ian Felgne , Sebas ian. elgne @helmhol z-hzi.de, Helmhol z-
Cen e o In ec ion Resea ch, Inho ens aße 7, 38124 B aunschweig, Ge many, Phone: + 49 531
6181 3133
& Con ibu ed equally o his wo k
ABBREVIATIONS: PAMP = pa hogen-associa ed molecula pa e n, LPS = lipopolysaccha ide, TLR
= oll-like ecep o , PPR = pa e n- ecogni ion ecep o , UK-1 = Uni e sal Kille 1, W = wild- ype,
MOI = mul iplici y o in ec ion, LDH = lac a e dehyd ogenase, IL = In e leukin, TNF-α = umo
nec osis ac o α, hpi = hou s pos in ec ion, dpi = days pos in ec ion, OMV = ou e memb ane
esicle, CT26 = mu ine colon ca cinoma, RenCa = enal adenoca cinoma, ELISA = enzyme-linked
immunoso ben assay, BMDM = bone-mo ow de i ed mac ophages
Abs ac : 150 wo ds
Wo ds: 5152
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
3
ABSTRACT:
Gene ically enginee ed Salmonella Typhimu ium a e po en ec o s o p ophylac ic and he apeu ic
measu es agains pa hogens as well as cance . This is based on he po en adju an ici y ha suppo s
s ong immune esponses. The physiology o Salmonella is well unde s ood. I simpli ies
enginee ing o bo h enhanced immune-s imula o y p ope ies as well as sa e y ea u es, hus,
esul ing in an app op ia e balance be ween a enua ion and e icacy o clinical applica ions. A
majo i ulence ac o o Salmonella is he lagellum. I is also a s ong pa hogen-associa ed
molecula pa e n ecognized by ex a- and in acellula ecep o s o immune cells o he hos . A
he same ime, i ep esen s a se ious me abolic bu den. Acco dingly, he bac e ia e ol ed igh
egula o y mechanisms ha con ol lagella syn hesis in i o. He e, we sys ema ically in es iga ed
he immunogenici y and adju an p ope ies o a ious lagella mu an s o Salmonella in i o and
in a mouse cance model in i o. We ound ha mu an s lacking he lagellum-speci ic ATPase
FliHIJ o he inne memb ane ing FliF displayed he g ea es s imula o y capaci y and s onges
an i- umo e ec s, while emaining sa e in i o. Scanning elec on mic oscopy e ealed he
p esence o ou e memb ane esicles in he Δ liF and Δ liHIJ mu an s. Finally, he combina ion o
he Δ liF and Δ liHIJ mu a ions wi h ou p e iously desc ibed a enua ed and immunogenic
backg ound s ain SF102 displayed s ong e icacy agains he highly esis an cance cell line
RenCa. We hus conclude ha manipula ing lagella biosyn hesis has g ea po en ial o he
cons uc ion o highly e icacious and e sa ile Salmonella ec o s ains.
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
4
INTRODUCTION
Despi e he exponen ial g ow h o biomedical knowledge o e he las decades, we a e s ill acing
heal h condi ions ha a e no con ollable. Thus, p esen biomedical esea ch is called upon o
p o ide solu ions o his dilemma. In ace o he demog aphic changes wi hin he wo ld popula ion
hese p oblems become e en mo e acu e wi h cance being one o he mos p essing p oblems.
Consequen ly, scien is s need o de elop no el and/o mo e e ec i e s a egies o accines and
immuno he apies. Sea ch o p ope p o ec i e an igens is equi ed o he success o such immune
in e en ions bu a he same ime e icacious and sa e adju an s a e equi ed o such s a egies.
Employmen o pa hogens as pla o ms o many o such app oaches is he e o e a s aigh o wa d
possibili y. These mic oo ganisms a e able o ac as po en ca ie s because hey elici s ong
immune eac ions i.e. hey exhibi s ong adju an p ope ies. Vi uses a e o en employed in his
con ex 1. Howe e , bac e ia ha e also success ully been es ed. Fo ins ance, Salmonella spp. a e
known o elici s ong cellula and humo al immune ac i i ies which unde sco e hei po en ial as an
e ec i e li e ca ie 2–4.
Salmonella spp. is a pa hogen. I may elici li e h ea ening disease in he hos . Hence, hei
pa hogenic p ope ies ha e o be a enua ed o ensu e sa e applica ion. In his case, a enua ion and
immune-s imula ion needs o be well in balance o gua an ee sa e y and e icacy 5,6. This ep esen s
he basic p oblem o li e bac e ial ca ie s.
Immune- ecogni ion, immune-s imula ion as well as immune-e asion o Salmonella a e closely
connec ed o he a ailabili y o pa hogen associa ed molecula pa e ns (PAMPs), such as
lipopolysaccha ide (LPS) o lagella 7. Responses o LPS, as an agonis o he Toll-like ecep o 4
(TLR-4) and causa i e agen o sepsis a e in ensi ely in es iga ed 8. LPS has been es ablished as
one o d i ing o ces o adju an ici y 5. These expe imen s included gene a ion o condi ionally
a enua ed Salmonella ca ie s ains. A egula o y connec ion be ween LPS modi ica ions and
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
5
lagella syn hesis ia he R lP/ClpXP pa hway has been sugges ed 9. In addi ion, he impai men o
bo h hese wo impo an PAMPs - LPS and lagellum - di ec ly led o a loss o he apeu ic po ency.
Appa en ly, such molecules a e essen ial asse s o he adju an ici y o he Salmonella ec o .
Howe e , he con ibu ion o he lagellum o he es ablishmen o a success ul in ec ion and i s
in ol emen in an e icacious immune s imula ion is less well explo ed. On he one hand, lagella
mo ili y con ibu es o pa hogenesis by p omo ing bac e ia-hos in e ac ions, adhe ence and
in asion o hos cells 10,11. On he o he hand, as soon as Salmonella eaches i s ana omical
des ina ion in he body, lagella syn hesis is a se ious bu den o he mic oo ganism. Down-
egula ion o a oid immune ecogni ion by Pa e n-Recogni ion-Recep o s (PPR), like ex acellula
TLR-5 o in acellula caspase-1 is essen ial o bac e ial su i al in i o 12,13. This e asion
mechanism al eady indica es ha bac e ia cons i u i ely exp essing lagella migh elici s ong
immune ac i a ion.
The lagellum is a sophis ica ed mac omolecula appa a us composed o se e al housand copies o
app oxima ely 25 di e en p o eins. I can be classi ied in o h ee main pa s: i) a basal body
embedded in he cy oplasmic memb ane ha a e ses he pe iplasm and cell wall up o he ou e
memb ane ( he engine), ii) a long ex e nal ilamen ( he p opelle ) and iii) a lexible, cu ed
s uc u e known as he “hook”, which connec s he basal body wi h he igid ilamen 14.
S. Typhimu ium usually encodes wo an igenically dis inc ilamen p o eins ( he lagellins FliC o
FljB), whose mu ually exclusi e exp ession is egula ed by phase swi ching 15. O no e, s ains
cons i u i ely exp essing he phase-2 lagellin p o ein FljB we e ound o be mo e po en in
a ge ing umo s in a mu ine umo model compa ed o s ains exp essing phase-1 FliC 16. In line
wi h hese obse a ions, Eom and colleagues obse ed an enhanced adju an ici y o Salmonella ha
co-exp essed bo h lagellin p o eins FliC and FljB 17. These esul s demons a e ha a modula ion
o syn hesis and assembly o lagella migh allow o enginee app op ia ely modi ied bac e ial
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.

6
ec o s ains o he apeu ic applica ions. Recen esul s con i m he impo ance o FlaB lagella
o success ul Salmonella based cance he apy 18. Fu he mo e, mo ili y, chemo axis and he
p esence o lagella as an igen ha e been shown o be impo an o umo he apy as well 18–21.
Thus, manipula ions o he a ious lagellum sub-s uc u es may posi i ely in luence he
pe o mance o he he apeu ic s ains.
In he p esen s udy, we aimed o sys ema ically un a el he connec ion be ween he p esence o
lagella componen s and immune s imula o y po ency. We hypo hesized ha manipula ing he
spa io empo al onse o lagella syn hesis o o a ious s eps in lagella assembly migh ep esen a
alid s a egy o inc ease he adju an powe o Salmonella ec o s ains wi hou inc easing hei
pa hogenici y. Thus, we in es iga ed h ee g oups o lagella mu an s (Figu e 1): i) lagellin phase
locked mu an s (FliC-ON, FljB-ON, FliC-ON & FljB-ON), ii) non- ilamen ous mu an s (∆ lgK,
∆ liF, ∆ liHIJ) and lagella o e p oduc ion mu an s (∆ lP, ∆ lP ∆ lgM and ∆ lP ∆ lgM ∆ lM).
In summa y, ou esul s highligh he impo ance o a con olled spa io empo al egula ion o
lagella syn hesis du ing hos -pa hogen in e ac ions. Salmonella mu an s lacking he inne
memb ane ing and basal body componen FliF o he lagellum-speci ic ATPase complex FliHIJ
displayed he highes he apeu ic e icacy in mu ine umo models despi e he ac ha hey a e
unable o assemble lagella. We hus belie e ha he lagellum o Salmonella ep esen s an ideal
a ge o immunomodula o y modi ica ions and i migh be possible o gene a e op imized sa e
ec o s ains wi h imp o ed adju an p ope ies o p ophylaxis and he apy.
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
7
MATERIALS AND METHODS
E hics s a emen : All animal expe imen s we e pe o med acco ding o guidelines o he Ge man
Law o Animal P o ec ion and wi h pe mission o he local e hics commi ee and he local au ho i y
LAVES (Niede sächsisches Landesam ü Ve b auche schu z und Lebensmi elsiche hei ) unde
pe mission numbe 33.9-42502-04-12/0713, 33.9-42502-04-13/1122 and 33.9-42502-04-13/1191.
S ains and p epa a ion o inoculum: Bac e ial s ains a e shown in Table S1. S ain cons uc ion
was done by P22 phage ansduc ion o λ- ed ecombina ion 22. Salmonella s ains we e g own
o e nigh and sub-cul u ed o mid-log phase in LB media a 37 °C. The bac e ia we e washed wice
and adjus ed o he desi ed OD600 in py ogen ee PBS. Pla ing se ed as con ol.
Cell lines and p ima y cells: Immo alized RAW264.7 mac ophages (RRID:CVCL_0493) we e
used o in asion assays and ob ained om Raschke e al. 23 (Salk Ins i u e, San Diego, USA).
CT26 umo cells (RRID:CVCL_7524, ob ained om: B a ain e al. 24, Comp ehensi e Cance
Cen e , Uni e si y o Alabama, USA) and RenCa umo cells (RRID:CVCL_2174, ob ained om:
Wells e al. 25, Tumo Biology Cen e , F eibu g, Ge many) we e used o he subcu aneous mu ine
umo model. All cell cul u es used in his s udy we e es ed and con i med as mycoplasma- ee.
Bone-ma ow de i ed mac ophages (BMDMs) we e isola ed om he emu o BALB/c mice and
di e en ia ed using 20% ( / ) L929 (RRID:CVCL_0462, ob ained om: Monne e al. 26, Na ional
Resea ch Cen e o Bio echnology, B aunschweig, Ge many) condi ioned medium in RPMI
con aining 10% FCS. All cells we e main ained a 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 90% el. humidi y.
Mo ili y assay: The mo ili y o he Salmonella s ains was assessed on semi-solid aga pla es
con aining 0.3% (w / ol) aga by inocula ing 2 µl o a bac e ial o e nigh cul u e in o he aga and
incuba ed a 37 °C. The swa m diame e was measu ed a e 4 h incuba ion.
Flagella immunos aining: Salmonella s ains g own o mid-log g ow h phase we e ixed on L-
lysine coa ed mic oscopy slides using o maldehyde (c = 2%, / ) and glu a aldehyde (c = 0.2%,
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
8
/ ). Flagellum s aining was accomplished using polyclonal abbi an i-FliC (Di co) as p ima y and
an i- abbi Alexa Fluo -488 as seconda y an ibody and he bac e ia we e s ained wi h DAPI (Sigma-
Ald ich). Images we e aken using an Axio Obse e mic oscope equipped wi h an Axiocam HR
came a (Zeiss) a 100x magni ica ion and analyzed wi h ImageJ.
In asion assays: RAW 264.7 and BMDM mycoplasma- ee cells we e used o he phagocy ic
up ake and in acellula eplica ion. The assay was pe o med as desc ibed be o e 27 using MOIs o
1 and 10. CFUs we e de e mined by pla ing o se ial dilu ions and compa ed o he co esponding
pa en al s ains.
Mu ine umo model: Six-week old BALB/c mice (Jan ie ) we e in ade mally inocula ed wi h
5*105 syngeneic CT26 o 2*106 RenCa umo cells in he igh lank. Tumo de elopmen was
moni o ed using calipe measu emen s. Upon eaching a umo olume o app ox. 150 mm³, he
mice we e injec ed in a enously in o he ail ein wi h 5*106 Salmonella.
The apeu ic e icacy: Tumo de elopmen was moni o ed using calipe measu emen s o as long
as umo s pe sis ed o un il con on ed wi h a humane endpoin in e ms o exceedingly la ge umo
size (~ 1 cm³) o mo bidi y. Body weigh as gene al heal h indica o was moni o ed using a scale. A
loss o body weigh below 80% o he o iginal body weigh was incen i e o eu hanize a subjec .
TNF-α ELISA measu emen : Supe na an samples o cul i a ed mac ophages we e aken 6 h pos
in ec ion. The TNF-α ELISA MaxTM S anda d Ki (Biolegend) was used o de e mine he TNF-α
le el acco ding o he manu ac u e ’s manual. Th ee di e en biological eplica es we e analyzed
and a PBS ea ed g oup se ed as nega i e con ol.
Cy okine, chemokine and g ow h ac o de ec ion in supe na an s and se a: Cy okine, chemokine
and g ow h ac o concen a ions in supe na an s o 264.7 RAW mac ophages cells (6 hpi) o se a
(1.5 hpi, 6 hpi and 24 hpi) we e quan i ied by he Luminex-based mul iplex echnique acco ding o
he manu ac u e ’s ins uc ions (Bio-Rad, USA). S anda d cu es and concen a ions we e
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
9
calcula ed wi h Bio-Plex Manage 6.0, he de ec ion sensi i i y o all p o eins was be ween 1 pg/ml
and 40 µg/ml.
RNA isola ion and sequencing: RNA isola ion was pe o med as desc ibed p e iously 16. Lib a y
p epa a ion o plank onic cul u es g own o mid-log phase was done using he Sc ip SeqTM 2
RNA-Seq Lib a y P ep Ki (Illumina) and he endo ’s p o ocol. Sequence eads we e mapped o
he genome sequence o he e e ence s ain Salmonella en e ica subsp. en e ica se o a
Typhimu ium UK-1 (Genbank, CP002614.1) using bow ie2 28. Di e en ial gene exp ession was
calcula ed using obus gene alized linea models and he quasi-likelihood F- es o he R package
edgeR 29. Genes we e conside ed di e en ially exp essed i he old change exp ession was
signi ican ly g ea e han 2 (edgeR unc ion glmT ea ) wi h a alse-disco e y a e (FDR) cu o o
0.05. Mul idimensional scaling plo s (MDS) we e isualized using ggplo 2 30.
Genome sequencing and SNP calling: Genomic DNA was ex ac ed om plank onic o e nigh
cul u es using he DNeasy Blood & Tissue ki (Qiagen) and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq. Single
nucleo ide polymo phism (SNP) analysis o DNA sequencing da a was ca ied ou using sam ools
mpileup and py hon 31.
S a is ics: Signi icance be ween wo g oups was de e mined using he nonpa ame ic Mann-
Whi ney es , while one-way analysis o a iance (ANOVA) wi h Bon e oni pos es was used o
compa e wo o mo e g oups. Signi icance le els o p < 0.05, p < 0.01, o p < 0.001 we e deno ed
wi h as e isks: *, **, and ***, espec i ely.
Da a a ailabili y: All aw and p ocessed sequencing da a ha e been submi ed o GEO
(GSE116623; h ps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go /geo/que y/acc.cgi?acc=GSE116623). All aw and
p ocessed genome sequencing da a ha e been submi ed o SRA (SRP153811,
h ps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go /s a/SRP153811).
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
16
ha may be esponsible o his pa icula pheno ype. We employed scanning elec on mic oscopy
o sea ch o al e a ions a he cell su ace o bac e ial shape (Figu e 6). In e es ingly, his analysis
e ealed he p esence o ou e memb ane esicles (OMV) o SF102 + Δ liF and SF102 + Δ liHIJ
mu an s while all he o he mu an s did no exhibi such s uc u es. Impo an ly, he combina ion o
all ea u es (e.g. ΔlpxR ΔpagP ΔpagL - Δa oA - Δ liF o Δ liHIJ) was equi ed o p omo e OMV
o ma ion (Supplemen a y Figu e S6). Salmonella de i a i es ha lack a leas one o hese
p ope ies did no display any OMVs unde ou condi ions. As OMVs include high amoun s o LPS
and a e known o con ain lagella p o eins 44, hus, he inc eased immunogenic po en ial may e y
well be a ibu ed o hese s uc u es.
Ano he possibili y o he obse ed OMV p oduc ion was due o an independen , unin en ional
mu a ion ha may ha e accumula ed du ing he s ain cons uc ions. The e o e, we sequenced he
genome o he Δ liF mu an and i s pa en al s ains as i exhibi ed he mos p onounced OMV
p oduc ion (Table S3). No appa en SNPs o addi ional dele ions we e de ec ed in he SF102 + Δ liF
s ain ha may ha e con ibu ed o he OMV pheno ype. The e o e, he genomic o ansc ip ional
o igin o he enhanced OMV o ma ion emains unanswe ed.
Δ liHIJ and Δ liF mu an s display ad anced an i- umo p ope ies: Nex , we e alua ed whe he
he s ongly induced cy okine pa e n and p oduc ion o OMVs co ela ed wi h he he apeu ic
e icacy o he lagella mu an s ains in a mu ine umo model. O no e, umo coloniza ion i sel
appea s no o be a ec ed by he modi ica ions o he bac e ial lagella as shown p e iously 33 and
con i med by pla ing (da a no shown). CT26 umo -bea ing mice we e in ec ed in a enously wi h
5*106 bac e ia and he body weigh changes as indica o o he heal h bu den o he apy as well as
he he apeu ic e icacy was assessed (Figu e 7). Upon bac e ial applica ion, all in ec ed mice
su i ed he he apy and weigh loss was a ound 10% a mos . This can be conside ed as mino
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.

17
(Figu e 7A). The egula o y mu an s SF102 + Δ lgK and SF102 + Δ lP Δ lgM Δ lM appea ed o be
highly a enua ed as he body weigh eco e ed e y as upon an ini ial d op. In con as , he
s uc u al lagella mu an s induced a pe sis en weigh loss ha only slowly eco e ed a e 6 days.
Howe e , hese s uc u al mu an s SF102 + Δ liF and SF102 + Δ liHIJ displayed he mos
p onounced an i- umo e ec . The bac e ia clea ed all he CT26 umo s wi hin 8 o 4 days,
espec i ely (Figu e 7B and Supplemen a y Figu e S7 o indi idual umo de elopmen ). In
addi ion, he pa en al s ain SF102 and i s Δ lhDC de i a i e we e able o clea 80% o he analyzed
umo s (5/6). In con as , he hype - lagella ed s ain SF102 + Δ lP Δ lgM Δ lM and he assembly
mu an SF102 + Δ lgK appea ed o be o e -a enua ed. The umo -clea ing capaci y was e en lowe
han ha o he pa en al SF102 s ain. In summa y, he Δ liHIJ mu an s ain exhibi ed he s onges
po en ial o clea CT26 umo s. Howe e , he Δ liF s ain exhibi ed he bes balance o sa e y and
e icacy. The mice eco e ed as es om e ec s o he in ec ion when exposed o hese bac e ia.
Combina ion o SF102+Δ liF o SF102+Δ liHIJ s ongly a ec RenCa umo s: Al hough he
cause o he s ong p oduc ion o OMVs in he SF102 + Δ liF o SF102 + Δ liHIJ s ains emains
unknown, hese s uc u es likely con ibu e o he imp o ed immunogenici y. We he e o e
wonde ed how s ongly he he apeu ic po ency o hese s ains was imp o ed. Thus, we es ed
hese mu an s agains he highly esis an cance cell line RenCa (Figu e 7C). As shown be o e, he
LPS mu an s only e a ded he g ow h RenCa sho ly 5. In con as , employing SF102 + Δ liF and
SF102 + Δ liHIJ o he apy d ama ically imp o ed he an i- umo esponse and signi ican ly
p olonged he su i al o he RenCa bea ing mice. Thus, he unique combina ion o mu a ions and
speci ically he in oduc ion o he gene dele ions Δ liF o Δ liHIJ a ec ing lagella assembly and
egula ion esul ed in an i-cance s ains o excep ional he apeu ic po ency.
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
18
DISCUSSION
Salmonella exe s unique di ec in e ac ions wi h he hos cell ia specialized sec e ion sys ems,
e ec o p o eins o PAMPs. Thus, Salmonella displays g ea po en ial as a highly e sa ile a ge ed
deli e y sys em o accina ion and cance immune he apies 45–48. Flagella ep esen one o he
majo PAMPs o hese bac e ia. Hence, in he p esen s udy we aimed o in es iga e he e ec s o
he s uc u e, spa io- empo al egula ion and syn hesis o he bac e ial lagellum du ing hos -
pa hogen in e ac ions and in he apy.
To co e a b oad ange o lagella pheno ypes, we in es iga ed he beha io o ele en di e en
Salmonella a ian s mu a ed in a ious egula o y and s uc u al componen s o he lagellum. Fo
ins ance, dele ing he hin ecombinase esponsible o lagellin phase a ia ion in Salmonella
allowed o enginee lagellin phase-locked mu an s ha exp essed ei he FliC o FljB 49. In o de o
gene a e a mu an ha co-exp essed bo h ilamen p o eins, we addi ionally dele ed he nega i e
egula o o liC ansla ion, FljA, in a FljB-ON backg ound 50. Unde hese condi ions, e e y
indi idual lagellum p esumably consis s o a mix u e o bo h p o eins. The a ian exhibi ed
educed mo ili y al hough he numbe o lagella pe cell was no mal. I migh be possible ha he
s uc u al di e ences be ween bo h lagellin ypes dec ease he e iciency o lagella unc ion, e.g.
by impai ing ilamen bundle o ma ion.
In compa ison o he W , he FliC-ON phase-locked mu an did no exhibi any supe io
immunogenic beha io in i o and in i o. In con as , immune ac i a ion by he FljB-locked s ain
was inc eased du ing he ea ly s ages o in ec ion. This co ela ed wi h p e ious obse a ions ha
Salmonella exp essing FljB exhibi highe adju an po en ial 17,51. This migh also explain why he
s ain SF102, published p e iously, ep esen s a highly immunogenic he apeu ic ec o . I
p edomina ely exp esses FljB 16. The bene icial e ec o FljB-only exp ession anishes a he la e
s ages o in ec ion.
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
19
Salmonella in he mammalian hos is known o down- egula e lagella exp ession o a oid
ecogni ion by TLR-5 o caspase-1 13,52. To coun e ac his escape mechanism, we in es iga ed he
ole o egula o s o lagella syn hesis: lP, lgM and lM 38,53,54. As expec ed, s ains bea ing
dele ions o ei he gene esul ed in a signi ican ly inc eased lagella ion s a us and enhanced
lagellin p oduc ion. In e es ingly, his o e p oduc ion a ec ed bac e ial g ow h in i o.
Fu he mo e, when exposing he o e p oducing iple mu an Δ lP Δ lgM Δ lM o mac ophages,
we de ec ed inc eased le els o LDH in he supe na an s. This sugges ed ha he hype - lagella ion
migh induce in acellula caspase-1 esul ing in py op osis and mac ophage cell dea h 55. Bac e ial
dea h would consequen ly be he esul om exposu e o gen amycin in he medium. In i o, such
lagella-o e p oducing s ains would no be able o hide om immune ecogni ion o es ablish hei
in acellula niche. This is consis en wi h in i o e icacy o his s ain. I appea ed o e -a enua ed.
The mice eco e ed al eady 4 dpi and he umo clea ing e icacy was only sligh ly abo e 50%.
Thus, hype - lagella ion o he Salmonella ec o could ep esen a p omising s a egy o inc ease
accine adju an ici y bu may no be a po en s a egy o umo he apeu ic applica ions.
As hype - lagella ion did no appea o be bene icial due o he me abolic bu den and/o he
ex ensi e ac i a ion o py op osis, we nex in es iga ed he Δ lgK mu an , which is able o sec e e
monome ic lagellin, bu is unable o assemble lagella ilamen s 56. In i o, he Δ lgK mu an
induced a s ong IL-6 and TNF-α esponse. This may indica e a s ong s imula ion o he TLR-5
ecep o due o he enhanced le els o monome ic lagellin 57. Howe e , his s ong pheno ype
disappea ed in i o. Possibly, soluble lagellin was dilu ed o diges ed in he blood o he issue and
did no each concen a ions su icien o s imula e TLR-5 o in acellula ecep o s like NOD-like
ecep o s o NLRP3. This also co ela ed wi h he low e icacy in he an i- umo esponse.
The e o e, a Δ lgK dele ion may no ep esen a good choice when a emp ing o op imize a ec o
s ain o he apy.
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
20
Finally, we es ed s ains wi hou ex acellula lagella. We dele ed he gene coding o FliF, which
o ms he MS- ing o he lagella basal body in he inne memb ane 37, o FliHIJ, which is an
ATPase complex in ol ed in he expo o lagella building blocks 58. Bo h s ains nei he exp essed
no sec e ed lagellin and hus we e non-mo ile. In e es ingly, bo h s ains we e highly
immunogenic in i o and in i o. In an o he wise W backg ound, he Δ liF mu a ion induced
sec e ion o high le els o p o-in lamma o y cy okines like TNF-α o IL-6. Once he mu a ion was
ans e ed on o ou immunogenic backg ound s ain UK-1, he Δ liHIJ mu a ion displayed he mos
p onounced cy okine esponse. As FliC is an impo an PAMP ha con e s immunogenici y, his
inding was su p ising since hese mu an s a e no able o exp ess lagellin and he e o e lack he
lagella ilamen . Impo an ly, in ou he apeu ic model he SF102 + Δ liF and SF102 + Δ liHIJ
s ains we e able o clea all CT26 umo s wi hin 8 o 4 days, espec i ely. All mice su i ed he
he apy. The e o e, hese s ains exhibi an op imal balance o sa e y and e icacy.
As pu a i e eason o hei supe io i y, we made he se endipi ous disco e y ha a subs an ial
amoun o OMVs was p oduced by hese mu an s. Al hough he mechanism o OMV p oduc ion
s ill emains elusi e, we belie e ha hey signi ican ly con ibu e o he supe io he apeu ic
e icacy o hese s ains. The inc eased le els o p o-in lamma o y cy okines may de i e om he
LPS ha p edomina ely o ms he esicles o he pu a i e ca go o he OMVs ha migh include
bac e ial RNA and DNA 59. In addi ion, ecen p o eome s udies ha e shown ha OMVs can ca y
lagella p o eins 44.
The MS- ing made o FliF and he ATPase complex FliHIJ a e impo an componen s o he lagella
expo appa a us ha sec e es lagella building blocks om he in acellula o he ex acellula
space. The dele ion o ei he he Class 2 genes liF o liHIJ esul s in de ec i e lagella basal
bodies and he e o e accumula e lagella building blocks in he cy oplasm. Thus, he enhanced
OMV p oduc ion migh be a s a egy o he cell o emo e excessi e lagella p o eins. This
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
21
hypo hesis is suppo ed by he ac ha no nega i e egula o con olling lagella syn hesis a he
le el o Class 2 gene exp ession was ound o be signi ican ly egula ed.
Besides hei immune-s imula o y capaci y, he p esence o OMVs could be u he exploi ed as
deli e y sys em in u u e s udies 60,61. The e o e, using dele ions o he Class 2 genes liF and liHIJ
in combina ion wi h o he immunomodula o y mu a ions like he SF102 backg ound could u n
Salmonella in o a e y e ec i e deli e y ec o pla o m. Va ious immunogenic ca gos o
he apeu ic agen s may be anspo ed di ec ly in o umo cells o immune cells o he hos .
Taken oge he , he co ec spa io empo al egula ion o lagella syn hesis du ing hos -pa hogen
in e ac ions exe s di ec impac on he he apeu ic e icacy o Salmonella ec o s ains. While
mu an s o e -exp essing lagella we e oo sensi i e o he immune sys em o he hos , he mu a ions
∆ liF and ∆ liHIJ appea ed o be highly e icacious in ou mu ine umo models. Inc eased
immunogenic p ope ies we e con e ed by hese mu a ions. Especially he unique p oduc ion o
high numbe s o OMVs induced by mu a ions o liF and liHIJ migh allow o enhance in insic
he apeu ic ea u es o he bac e ia and ende Salmonella in o an e icacious deli e y pla o m.
Such Salmonella-based ec o s migh ep esen po en s ains o cance he apy, which is
e idenced by he subs an ial g ow h e a da ion o he e y esilien RenCa umo s, which ha e
been highly esis an o his ype o he apy hus a .
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.

22
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Ou g a i ude is ex ended o Regina Lesch and Nadine Kö ne o hei expe echnical assis ance.
Mo eo e , we hank Roy Cu iss III o p o iding pa en al s ains o Salmonella, along wi h expe
ad ice conce ning s ain design. The s udy was suppo ed in pa by he Niede sächsische
K ebsgesellscha , he Deu sche K ebshil e, he Bundesminis e ium ü Bildung und Fo schung
(BMBF) ia he INDIGO p og am, Hanno e Biomedical Resea ch School (HBRS) (all o SW), a
Lich enbe g Fellowship om he Niede sächsiche Minis e ium ü Wissenscha und Kul u
(MWK) ( o SF), an Explo a ion G an o he Boeh inge Ingelheim Founda ion (BIS) ( o SF and
ME) and he Helmhol z Associa ion Young In es iga o g an no. VH-NG-932 ( o ME).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
S.F., I.S., V.P., D.K., C.F. and M.R. pe o med and analyzed he expe imen s. M.P. and S.H. we e
esponsible o he sequencing analyses. S.H., S.W. and M.E. p o ided ideas and c i ical commen s.
S.F., S.W. and M.E. w o e he manusc ip . S.W. and M.E. di ec ed he p ojec .
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The au ho s decla e ha he e is no con lic o in e es .
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
23
REFERENCES
1. Bou nazos S, Ra e ch J V. A enua ed Vaccines o Augmen ed Immuni y. Cell Hos Mic obe
2017; 21:314–5.
2. Cu iss III R. An igen Deli e y Sys em II: De elopmen o Li e A enua ed Bac e ial
Vec o s. In: Mucosal Immunology. Else ie Inc., 2015. 1233–69.
3. Wang S, Kong Q, Cu iss R. New echnologies in de eloping ecombinan a enua ed
Salmonella accine ec o s. Mic ob Pa hog 2013; 58:17–28.
4. Mi a A, Loh A, Gonzales A, Laniewski P, Willingham C, Cu iss-Iii R, Roland KL. Sa e y
and p o ec i e e icacy o li e a enua ed Salmonella Gallina um mu an s in Rhode Island
Red chickens. Vaccine 2012; 31:1094–9.
5. F ahm M, Felgne S, Kocijancic D, Rohde M, Hensel M, Cu iss R, E ha d M, Weiss S.
E iciency o Condi ionally A enua ed Salmonella en e ica Se o a Typhimu ium in
Bac e ium-Media ed Tumo The apy. MBio 2015; 6:e00254-15.
6. Felgne S, Kocijancic D, F ahm M, Weiss S. Bac e ia in Cance The apy: Renaissance o an
Old Concep . In J Mic obiol 2016; 2016:1–14.
7. Ruby T, McLaughlin L, Gopina h S, Monack D. Salmonella’s long- e m ela ionship wi h i s
hos . FEMS Mic obiol Re 2012; 36:600–15.
8. Molloy S. Hos esponse: LPS goes non-canonical. Na Re Mic obiol 2013; 11:599–599.
9. Spö ing I, Felgne S, P euße M, Eckweile D, Rohde M, Häussle S, Weiss S, E ha d M.
Regula ion o Flagellum Biosyn hesis in Response o Cell En elope S ess in Salmonella
en e ica Se o a Typhimu ium. mBio 2018; 9:e00736-17.
10. Duan Q, Zhou M, Zhu L, Zhu G. Flagella and bac e ial pa hogenici y. J Basic Mic obiol
2013; 53:1–8.
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
24
11. Ho s mann JA, Zschieschang E, T uschel T, de Diego J, Lunelli M, Rohde M, May T,
S owig T, S adal T, Kolbe M, E ha d M. Flagellin phase-dependen swimming on epi helial
cell su aces con ibu es o p oduc i e Salmonella gu coloniza ion. Cell Mic obiol 2017;
19:e12739.
12. Nys öm S, B å e A, Falkebo n T, De i o C, Rissiek B, Johansson D, Sch öde U, Uema su
S, Aki a S, Hinkula J, Applequis S. DNA-Encoded Flagellin Ac i a es Toll-Like Recep o 5
(TLR5), Nod-like Recep o Family CARD Domain-Con aining P o ein 4 (NRLC4), and Ac s
as an Epide mal, Sys emic, and Mucosal-Adju an . Vaccines 2013; 1:415–43.
13. Miao E a, Rajan J V. Salmonella and Caspase-1: A complex In e play o De ec ion and
E asion. F on Mic obiol 2011; 2:85.
14. Che ance FF V, Hughes KT. Coo dina ing assembly o a bac e ial mac omolecula machine.
Na Re Mic o 2008; 6:455–65.
15. Zieg J, Sil e man M, Hilmen M, Simon M. Recombina ional swi ch o gene exp ession.
Science 1977; 196:170–2.
16. Felgne S, F ahm M, Kocijancic D, Rohde M, Eckweile D, Bielecka A, Bueno E, Ca a F,
Ab aham W-R, Cu iss R, Häussle S, E ha d M, e al. A oa-de icien Salmonella en e ica
se o a Typhimu ium is mo e han a me abolically a enua ed mu an . MBio 2016; 7:e01220-
16.
17. Eom JS, Seok Kim J, Im Jang J, Kim B-H, Young Yoo S, Hyeon Choi J, Bang I-S, Lee IS,
Keun Pa k Y. Enhancemen o Hos Immune Responses by O al Vaccina ion o Salmonella
en e ica se o a Typhimu ium Ha bo ing Bo h FliC and FljB Flagella. PLoS One 2013;
8:e74850.
18. Zheng JH, Nguyen VH, Jiang S-N, Pa k S-H, Tan W, Hong SH, Shin MG, Chung I-J, Hong
Y, Bom H-S, Choy HE, Lee SE, e al. Two-s ep enhanced cance immuno he apy wi h
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
25
enginee ed Salmonella yphimu ium sec e ing he e ologous lagellin. Sci T ansl Med 2017;
9:eaak9537.
19. B oadway KM, Denson EAP, Jensen R V, Scha BE. Rescuing chemo axis o he an icance
agen Salmonella en e ica se o a Typhimu ium VNP20009. J Bio echnol 2015; 211:117–20.
20. Nguyen CT, Hong SH, Sin J-I, Vu HVD, Jeong K, Cho KO, Uema su S, Aki a S, Lee SE,
Rhee JH. Flagellin enhances umo -speci ic CD8+ T cell immune esponses h ough TLR5
s imula ion in a he apeu ic cance accine model. Vaccine 2013; 31:3879–87.
21. Kasinskas RW, Fo bes NS. Salmonella yphimu ium speci ically chemo ax and p oli e a e in
he e ogeneous umo issue in i o. Bio echnol Bioeng 2006; 94:710–21.
22. Da senko KA, Wanne BL. One-s ep inac i a ion o ch omosomal genes in Esche ichia coli
K-12 using PCR p oduc s . PNAS 2000; 97:6640–5.
23. Raschke WC, Bai d S, Ralph P, Nakoinz I. Func ional mac ophage cell lines ans o med by
abelson leukemia i us. Cell 1978; 15:261–7.
24. B a ain MG, S obel-S e ens J, Fine D, Webb M, Sa i AM. Es ablishmen o mouse
colonic ca cinoma cell lines wi h di e en me as a ic p ope ies. Cance Res 1980; 40:2142–
6.
25. Mau e -Gebha d M, Schmid M, Azema M, Al enschmid U, S ocklin E, Wels W, G one B.
Sys emic ea men wi h a ecombinan e bB-2 ecep o -speci ic umo oxin e icien ly
educes pulmona y me as ases in mice injec ed wi h gene ically modi ied ca cinoma cells.
Cance Res 1998; 58:2661–6.
26. Monne DA, Denke B. Cha ac e iza ion o clonally de i ed, spon aneously ans o med
bone ma ow mac ophage cell lines om lipopolysaccha ide hypo esponsi e LPS(d) and
no mal LPS(n) mice. J Leukoc Biol 1997; 61:469–80.
27. Gah ing LC, He on F, Finlay BB, Falkow S. In asion and eplica ion o Salmonella
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
32
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.

33
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
34
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
35
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
36
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.
37
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.

38
Accep ed A icle
This a icle is p o ec ed by copy igh . All igh s ese ed.