Accurate measurement of the standard 235U(n,f) cross section from thermal to 170 keV neutron energy

Accurate measurement of the standard 235U(n,f) cross section from thermal to 170 keV neutron energy S. Amaducci15,35, O. Aberle1, J. Andrzejewski2, L. Audouin3, M. Bacak4,1,5, J. Balibrea6, M. Barbagallo7, F. Beˇ cvᡠr8, E. Berthoumieux5, J. Billowes9, D. Bosnar10, A. Brown11, M. Caamaño12, F. Calviño13, M. Calviani1, D. Cano-Ott6, R. Cardella1, A. Casanovas13, F. Cerutti1, Y. H. Chen3, E. Chiaveri1,9,14, N. Colonna7, G. Cortés13, M. A. Cortés-Giraldo14, L. Cosentino15, L. A. Damone7,16, M. Diakaki5, C. Domingo-Pardo17, R. Dressler18, E. Dupont5, I. Durán12, B. FernándezDomínguez12, A. Ferrari1, P. Ferreira19, P. Finocchiaro15, V. Furman20, K. Göbel21, A. R. García6, A. Gawlik2, S. Gilardoni1, T. Glodariu22, I. F. Gonçalves19, E. González-Romero6, E. Griesmayer4, C. Guerrero14, F. Gunsing5,1, H. Harada23, S. Heinitz18, J. Heyse24, D. G. Jenkins11, E. Jericha4, F. Käppeler25, Y. Kadi1, A. Kalamara26, P. Kavrigin4, A. Kimura23, N. Kivel18, I. Knapova8, M. Kokkoris26, M. Krtiˇ cka8, D. Kurtulgil21, E. Leal-Cidoncha12, C. Lederer27, H. Leeb4, J. Lerendegui-Marco14, S. Lo Meo28,29, S. J. Lonsdale27, D. Macina1, A. Manna29,30, J. Marganiec2,31, T. Martínez6, A. Masi1, C. Massimi29,30, P. Mastinu32, M. Mastromarco7, E. A. Maugeri18, A. Mazzone7,33, E. Mendoza6, A. Mengoni28, P. M. Milazzo34, F. Mingrone1, A. Musumarra15,35, A. Negret22, R. Nolte31, A. Oprea22, N. Patronis36, A. Pavlik37, J. Perkowski2, I. Porras38, J. Praena38, J. M. Quesada14, D. Radeck31, T. Rauscher39,40, R. Reifarth21, C. Rubbia1, J. A. Ryan9, M. Sabaté-Gilarte1,14, A. Saxena41, P. Schillebeeckx24, D. Schumann18, P. Sedyshev20, A. G. Smith9, N. V. Sosnin9, A. Stamatopoulos26, G. Tagliente7, J. L. Tain17, A. Tarifeño-Saldivia13, L. Tassan-Got3, S. Valenta8, G. Vannini29,30, V. Variale7, P. Vaz19, A. Ventura29, V. Vlachoudis1, R. Vlastou26, A. Wallner43, S. Warren9, C. Weiss4, P. J. Woods27, T. Wright9, and P. Žugec10,1 and the n_TOF Collaboration 1European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Switzerland 2University of Lodz, Poland 3Institut de Physique Nucléaire, CNRS-IN2P3, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91406 Orsay Cedex, France 4Technische Universität Wien, Austria 5CEA Irfu, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 6Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Spain 7Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Italy 8Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 9University of Manchester, United Kingdom 10Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia 11University of York, United Kingdom 12University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain 13Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain 14Universidad de Sevilla, Spain 15INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy 16Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Bari, Italy 17Instituto de Física Corpuscular, CSIC - Universidad de Valencia, Spain 18Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Villingen, Switzerland 19Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal 20Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR), Dubna, Russia 21Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany 22Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Romania 23Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai-mura, Japan 24European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Geel, Retieseweg 111, B-2440 Geel, Belgium 25Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Campus North, IKP, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany 26National Technical University of Athens, Greece 27School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom 28Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie (ENEA), Bologna, Italy 29Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna, Italy 30Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, Italy 31Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany 32Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Legnaro, Italy 33Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy 34Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Italy EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 08002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023908002 ND2019 © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 35Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy 36University of Ioannina, Greece 37University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna, Austria 38University of Granada, Spain 39Department of Physics, University of Basel, Switzerland 40Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom 41Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), India 42Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, Italy 43Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Abstract. An accurate measurement of the 235U(n,f) cross section from thermal to 170 keV of neutron energy has recently been performed at n_TOF facility at CERN using 6Li(n,t)4He and 10B(n,α)7Li as references. This measurement has been carried out in order to investigate a possible overestimation of the 235U fission cross section evaluation provided by most recent libraries between 10 and 30 keV. A custom experimental apparatus based on in-beam silicon detectors has been used, and a Monte Carlo simulation in GEANT4 has been employed to characterize the setup and calculate detectors efficiency. The results evidenced the presence of an overestimation in the interval between 9 and 18 keV and the new data may be used to decrease the uncertainty of 235U(n,f) cross section in the keV region. 1 Introduction Most of the neutron cross sections are measured using a standard reaction as reference, i.e. a small group of reactions know with high accuracy in a well defined energy interval [1] [2]. The use of this reference implies that the knowledge of the standard determines the achievable accuracy on the measured cross section. The 235U(n,f) is one of the most used references, thanks to the wide neutron energy range, indeed it is defined as standard at thermal (0.0253 eV) and from 0.15 to 200 MeV. Recent experimental data [3] highlighted a possible overestimation of the 235U fission cross section in the major libraries in the neutron energy range between 10 and 30 keV. Even if in this interval the 235U(n,f) is not a standard, it is still often used as reference, in particular for capture and fission cross section measurements of actinides. This energy interval is interesting for many technological applications, in particular for the design of new generation fission reactors and for nuclear waste burning, which require accurate neutron cross section data. In 2016 at n_TOF facility a new measurement of the 235U(n,f) cross section was performed, in order to obtain accurate data and investigate further on this discrepancy. For this measurement two different standard reactions have been used as references, namely 6Li(n,t)4He and 10B(n,α)7Li, while a stack of in-beam silicon detectors has been used to detect the reaction products. Even though in-beam silicons detectors have already been employed at n_TOF (see ref. [4]), this was the first time that in-beam silicons were used to measure fission reactions at n_TOF. 2 Experimental setup The measurement has been performed in the first experimental area of n_TOF facility at CERN. At n_TOF the protons accelerated by the PS (Proton Synchrotron) interact with a lead target and produce though a spallation process a pulsed neutron beam characterized by a very high instantaneous flux, this feature came proves to be very useful to increase the signal-to-background ratio when the sample is radioactive like the 235U. The neutron energy is measured using the time of flight technique with a resolution of 10−3-10−4, thanks to the long flight path (around 185 m). The 235U(n,f) cross section has been measured using 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) as reference, single pad silicon detectors were used to measure the reaction products, taking advantage of their good energy resolution to discriminate the products from the background. Six silicon and six samples have been arranged so that each detector faces only one sample as it is reported in fig. 1, the apparatus was placed in-beam and the neutrons were crossing all the detectors and samples. The silicons were 200 um thick, ensuring all the particles were stopped inside the detectors, and having an area of 5x5 cm2, relaxes the alignment constraint since the area is large compared to the n_TOF beam dimensions. For each reaction two detectors have been used, one placed after the corresponding sample, in order to measure the products in the forward direction with respect to the neutron beam, and one before the target to cover the backward direction. The presence of two detectors increases the redundancy and compensates to a large extent the systematic uncertainty due to angular anisotropy emission of products. 3 Data analysis A calibration of the flight path has been performed with a linear fit of the first resonances of the 235U(n,f), followed by a minimization of χ2between experimental data and ENDF-B/VIII evaluation, the value of L =183.49(2) m has been later used to transform the time of flight into kinetic energy. Thanks to the design of the experimental apparatus all the target samples shared the same neutron flux, apart from a correction due to absorption in the materials along the beam. Moreover the samples were thin enough to apply the thin-target approximation and the 235U(n,f) cross section can be calculated from the equation: 2 EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 08002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023908002 ND2019 35Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy 36University of Ioannina, Greece 37University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna, Austria 38University of Granada, Spain 39Department of Physics, University of Basel, Switzerland 40Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom 41Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), India 42Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, Italy 43Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Abstract. An accurate measurement of the 235U(n,f) cross section from thermal to 170 keV of neutron energy has recently been performed at n_TOF facility at CERN using 6Li(n,t)4He and 10B(n,α)7Li as references. This measurement has been carried out in order to investigate a possible overestimation of the 235U fission cross section evaluation provided by most recent libraries between 10 and 30 keV. A custom experimental apparatus based on in-beam silicon detectors has been used, and a Monte Carlo simulation in GEANT4 has been employed to characterize the setup and calculate detectors efficiency. The results evidenced the presence of an overestimation in the interval between 9 and 18 keV and the new data may be used to decrease the uncertainty of 235U(n,f) cross section in the keV region. 1 Introduction Most of the neutron cross sections are measured using a standard reaction as reference, i.e. a small group of reactions know with high accuracy in a well defined energy interval [1] [2]. The use of this reference implies that the knowledge of the standard determines the achievable accuracy on the measured cross section. The 235U(n,f) is one of the most used references, thanks to the wide neutron energy range, indeed it is defined as standard at thermal (0.0253 eV) and from 0.15 to 200 MeV. Recent experimental data [3] highlighted a possible overestimation of the 235U fission cross section in the major libraries in the neutron energy range between 10 and 30 keV. Even if in this interval the 235U(n,f) is not a standard, it is still often used as reference, in particular for capture and fission cross section measurements of actinides. This energy interval is interesting for many technological applications, in particular for the design of new generation fission reactors and for nuclear waste burning, which require accurate neutron cross section data. In 2016 at n_TOF facility a new measurement of the 235U(n,f) cross section was performed, in order to obtain accurate data and investigate further on this discrepancy. For this measurement two different standard reactions have been used as references, namely 6Li(n,t)4He and 10B(n,α)7Li, while a stack of in-beam silicon detectors has been used to detect the reaction products. Even though in-beam silicons detectors have already been employed at n_TOF (see ref. [4]), this was the first time that in-beam silicons were used to measure fission reactions at n_TOF. 2 Experimental setup The measurement has been performed in the first experimental area of n_TOF facility at CERN. At n_TOF the protons accelerated by the PS (Proton Synchrotron) interact with a lead target and produce though a spallation process a pulsed neutron beam characterized by a very high instantaneous flux, this feature came proves to be very useful to increase the signal-to-background ratio when the sample is radioactive like the 235U. The neutron energy is measured using the time of flight technique with a resolution of 10−3-10−4, thanks to the long flight path (around 185 m). The 235U(n,f) cross section has been measured using 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) as reference, single pad silicon detectors were used to measure the reaction products, taking advantage of their good energy resolution to discriminate the products from the background. Six silicon and six samples have been arranged so that each detector faces only one sample as it is reported in fig. 1, the apparatus was placed in-beam and the neutrons were crossing all the detectors and samples. The silicons were 200 um thick, ensuring all the particles were stopped inside the detectors, and having an area of 5x5 cm2, relaxes the alignment constraint since the area is large compared to the n_TOF beam dimensions. For each reaction two detectors have been used, one placed after the corresponding sample, in order to measure the products in the forward direction with respect to the neutron beam, and one before the target to cover the backward direction. The presence of two detectors increases the redundancy and compensates to a large extent the systematic uncertainty due to angular anisotropy emission of products. 3 Data analysis A calibration of the flight path has been performed with a linear fit of the first resonances of the 235U(n,f), followed by a minimization of χ2between experimental data and ENDF-B/VIII evaluation, the value of L =183.49(2) m has been later used to transform the time of flight into kinetic energy. Thanks to the design of the experimental apparatus all the target samples shared the same neutron flux, apart from a correction due to absorption in the materials along the beam. Moreover the samples were thin enough to apply the thin-target approximation and the 235U(n,f) cross section can be calculated from the equation: Figure 1. Design of the experimental apparatus, the silicons are named after the coupled sample, with the suffix "_f" for the forward direction and "_b" for the backward one. σ235U=C235Ufref ρre f εref Cref f235Uρ235Uε235U σref (1) where ref indicates a generic reference reaction. In eq. 1 CXis the count rate with respect to the neutron energy, fXis the correction for the absorption in the materials crossed, εXis the efficiency and ρXis the areal density. The count rate is obtained selecting the reaction products with a experimental threshold on the deposited energy, in particular for the reaction 6Li(n,t) we selected the tritons, for 10B(n,α) the alphas and for 235U(n,f) the fission fragments. The top panel of fig. 2 shows the two dimensional matrix of signal amplitude versus neutron energy for the silicon coupled with 235U sample, together with the threshold used to select the fission fragments. The wide separation between the alpha particles and the fragments is clear. The bottom panel shows the amplitude spectra of the same detector for different neutron energy intervals, on the righthand side one can identify the two-peak structure resulting from the asymmetric fission of 235U, the spectra are compressed due to a logarithmic behavior of the preamplifier for deposited energy larger than 10 MeV. The full experimental apparatus has been implemented in a Monte Carlo simulation made with the GEANT4 [6] code, in order to evaluate the correction factor for the absorption fXand the efficiencies of 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α). For the absorption a neutron beam with the same shape of the n_TOF one was simulated, the correction is represented by the fraction of neutrons entering in each target sample with respect to the simulated ones. The correction is mainly determined by the large cross section of 6Li and 10B at thermal and by the aluminum that composes the samples bakings and has large capture resonances in the keV region. The simulation was employed as well to calculate the efficiency of 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α), since for both these reactions the efficiency depends on neutron energy, in particular the main dependence is due to the anisotropy in the emission in the keV region. The reactions have been simulated according to the product angular distribution provided by ENDF-B/VIII [7], of course the experimental threshold has been calibrated and included in the simulation. The efficiency of the fission reaction Figure 2. Top panel: two dimensional plot of signals amplitude versus neutron energy for a silicon coupled to a 235U sample, the blue threshold separates fission fragments (upper region) from alpha particles (lower region). Bottom panel: amplitude spectra of the same detector for different neutron energy intervals, the separation of FF (right side) from the alpha background (left side) is very well defined. can be considered constant at this energy, thanks to the large Q-value (around 200 MeV) and the isotropic angular emission of fragments. Further details about the GEANT4 simulations are presented in ref. [8]. Once the corrections for absorption and efficiency have been applied for each reaction, the data of forward and backward detectors have been combined with a weighted average. After all the quantities that depend on the neutron energy have been calculated the shape of the fission cross section is obtained from eq. 1, apart from a constant term that includes the areal densities and the fission detection efficiency. This term has been calculated by normalizing the data to the integral of the 235U(n,f) cross section between 7.8 and 11 eV as recommended by ref. [1], since in this interval between two cross section minima the uncertainty arising from the time-to-energy calibration is negligible. Moreover at this energy the absorption in small and the contribution to the uncertainty coming from the correction is small. Table 1 lists the ratio between the thermal point, where the 235U(n,f) is a standard, and the integral between 7.8 and 11 eV for the IAEA and the measured cross section with the two standard references. The agreement is within 1 standard deviation, making the choice of the normaliza3 EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 08002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023908002 ND2019 Ratio σth /integral[7.8,11]eV (eV−1) IAEA2018 2.373 ±0.029 6Li as ref. 2.353 ±0.013(stat) ±0.007(syst) 10B as ref. 2.343 ±0.019(stat) ±0.007(syst) 10B+6Li 2.352 ±0.013(stat) ±0.007(syst) Table 1. Ratio between thermal and the [7.8,11]eV integral for IAEA and the experimental cross section measured with two standard reference reactions. tion in the 7.8 to 11 eV interval consistent with thermal standard point. Finally a final n_TOF 235U(n,f) cross section is calculated combining the two references 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) through a weighted average. 4 Results The measured 235U(n,f) cross section calculated with the two standard reactions 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) has been compared with ENDF-B/VIII [7], JEFF3.3 [9], JENDL4.0 [10] and IAEA [1] in the integrals reported in fig. 3. The top panel reports the ratio between the n_TOF fission cross section integral and the libraries, while the bottom panel presents the deviation in standard deviation units. In the first integral considered the measured cross section is 4-5% lower than all the libraries with the exception of JENDL4.0, for the first three libraries this deviation is statistically significant, however this deviation is absent in the integral from 18 to 30 keV, where the ratio is compatible with 1. The resulting effect on the 9 to 30 keV integral is a smaller deviation, indeed it is approximately 2%, even in terms of standard deviation the discrepancy is not significant, since the difference is lower than 3σwith respect to all the considered libraries. On the opposite the new data are in good agreement with JENDL4.0 for all the considered integrals, with deviations around or smaller than 1σ. The reliability of the present result is guaranteed by the good agreement in the energy regions where the 235U(n,f) is a standard, in particular the differences between 150 and 170 keV are lower than 1% and the agreement at thermal is evidenced in tab. 1. It is important to note that the IAEA values in this energy range are reported in form of point-wise cross section and the IAEA cross section of fig. 3 is calculated by applying a linear interpolation as recommended by ref. [1]. For ENDF-B/VIII, JEFF3.3 and JENDL4.0 there is no appreciable effect arising from interpolation, thanks to the narrow energy interval between two consecutive points. In order to make a direct comparison, removing the effects due to the interpolation procedure, the experimental data have been adapted to the IAEA energy grid. Later the 235U(n,f) cross section measured with 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) has separately been compared with IAEA values. The resulting ratios between the experimental data and IAEA values are reported in fig. 4 for the two separate data-sets, one can note that the deviation in the 9 to 18 keV integral previously discussed arises from the large difference (about 7%) for the point at 9.5 keV. However with the exception of the Figure 3. Comparison between n_TOF measured cross section and the values of more recent libraries integrated on intervals of interest. point at 9.5 keV the experimental data are in agreement with the IAEA values. Figure 4. Ratio between measured cross section and the IAEA in correspondence of GMA nodes. 5 Conclusion The 235U(n,f) is one of the most used standard cross section and the evidences of an overestimation between 10 and 30 keV in major libraries required further investigations. An accurate measurement of the 235U fission cross section has been performed at n_TOF from thermal to 170 keV neutron energy, using the standard reactions 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) as references and employing a custom experimental apparatus based on in-beam silicon detectors. The experimental setup and the data analysis are described in more detail in the complete article in ref. [8], the final data sets are available on EXFOR (23453.). The results highlighted an overall discrepancy between experimental data and three of the four considered libraries 4 EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 08002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023908002 ND2019 Ratio σth /integral[7.8,11]eV (eV−1) IAEA2018 2.373 ±0.029 6Li as ref. 2.353 ±0.013(stat) ±0.007(syst) 10B as ref. 2.343 ±0.019(stat) ±0.007(syst) 10B+6Li 2.352 ±0.013(stat) ±0.007(syst) Table 1. Ratio between thermal and the [7.8,11]eV integral for IAEA and the experimental cross section measured with two standard reference reactions. tion in the 7.8 to 11 eV interval consistent with thermal standard point. Finally a final n_TOF 235U(n,f) cross section is calculated combining the two references 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) through a weighted average. 4 Results The measured 235U(n,f) cross section calculated with the two standard reactions 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) has been compared with ENDF-B/VIII [7], JEFF3.3 [9], JENDL4.0 [10] and IAEA [1] in the integrals reported in fig. 3. The top panel reports the ratio between the n_TOF fission cross section integral and the libraries, while the bottom panel presents the deviation in standard deviation units. In the first integral considered the measured cross section is 4-5% lower than all the libraries with the exception of JENDL4.0, for the first three libraries this deviation is statistically significant, however this deviation is absent in the integral from 18 to 30 keV, where the ratio is compatible with 1. The resulting effect on the 9 to 30 keV integral is a smaller deviation, indeed it is approximately 2%, even in terms of standard deviation the discrepancy is not significant, since the difference is lower than 3σwith respect to all the considered libraries. On the opposite the new data are in good agreement with JENDL4.0 for all the considered integrals, with deviations around or smaller than 1σ. The reliability of the present result is guaranteed by the good agreement in the energy regions where the 235U(n,f) is a standard, in particular the differences between 150 and 170 keV are lower than 1% and the agreement at thermal is evidenced in tab. 1. It is important to note that the IAEA values in this energy range are reported in form of point-wise cross section and the IAEA cross section of fig. 3 is calculated by applying a linear interpolation as recommended by ref. [1]. For ENDF-B/VIII, JEFF3.3 and JENDL4.0 there is no appreciable effect arising from interpolation, thanks to the narrow energy interval between two consecutive points. In order to make a direct comparison, removing the effects due to the interpolation procedure, the experimental data have been adapted to the IAEA energy grid. Later the 235U(n,f) cross section measured with 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) has separately been compared with IAEA values. The resulting ratios between the experimental data and IAEA values are reported in fig. 4 for the two separate data-sets, one can note that the deviation in the 9 to 18 keV integral previously discussed arises from the large difference (about 7%) for the point at 9.5 keV. However with the exception of the Figure 3. Comparison between n_TOF measured cross section and the values of more recent libraries integrated on intervals of interest. point at 9.5 keV the experimental data are in agreement with the IAEA values. Figure 4. Ratio between measured cross section and the IAEA in correspondence of GMA nodes. 5 Conclusion The 235U(n,f) is one of the most used standard cross section and the evidences of an overestimation between 10 and 30 keV in major libraries required further investigations. An accurate measurement of the 235U fission cross section has been performed at n_TOF from thermal to 170 keV neutron energy, using the standard reactions 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α) as references and employing a custom experimental apparatus based on in-beam silicon detectors. The experimental setup and the data analysis are described in more detail in the complete article in ref. [8], the final data sets are available on EXFOR (23453.). The results highlighted an overall discrepancy between experimental data and three of the four considered libraries around 2% in the energy interval 9 to 30 keV, this difference resulted to be smaller than what has been observed in ref. [3]. In the energy region between 9 and 18 keV we found an overestimation around 4-5% in comparison to the evaluated cross section by ENDF-B/VIII, JEFF3.3 and IAEA. On the contrary no significant deviations have been observed between 18 and 30 keV for the mentioned libraries. Since the IAEA cross section is calculated through an interpolation of point-wise values, the n_TOF experimental data have been adapted to the IAEA grid and a direct comparison point-by-point has been done. The cross sections measured with the two references, namely 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,α), have been separately compared with the IAEA points. The experimental values are in a good agreement with the exception of the point at 9.5 keV, where a difference of the 7% has been observed. Indeed the discrepancy observed in the energy interval from 9 to 18 keV is due to this large difference in a single point together with the use of a linear interpolation. The reliability of these experimental data is assured by the good agreement in the energy interval where the 235U(n,f) cross section is a standard, namely at thermal energy and from 150 to 170 keV. The new data available may be used to reduce uncertainty on the 235U(n,f) cross section, in particular concerning the keV region. Furthermore this may lead in future to move the lower limit of the interval where the 235U(n,f) is a standard, at present 150 keV, to lower energies. References [1] A.D. Carlson et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148 143-188 (2018) [2] A.D. Carlson et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 110 3215 (2009) [3] M. Barbagallo et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49 156 (2013) [4] L. Cosentino et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 830 197 (2016) [5] C. Guerrero et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49 27 (2013) [6] S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 506 250 (2003) [7] D. A. Brown et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148 1 (2018) [8] S. Amaducci et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 55 120 (2019) [9] https://www.oecd-nea.org/dbdata/jeff/jeff33/ [10] K. Shibata et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48 1 (2011) 5 EPJ Web of Conferences 239, 08002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023908002 ND2019