scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Minor architecture as major architecture

Abstract

Based on a supposed conceptualization found in Manfredo Tafuri on the notion of "Major Architecture", which only appears only in one of his books and in a way not explicitly developed, a whole series of authors compare the openings of a contrary notion, "Minor Architecture", which would serve to counteract the excesses that the discipline has historically perpetuated. In particular, the term "Minor" goes back to Deleuze/Guattari's interpretation of Kafka's work as "Minor Literature". The temporality of the discussion between a major and a minor architecture starts in the field of the relationship literature/architecture in the American universities, at the end of the 1990s within the peak of the deconstruction. It should be remembered the definition of différance, where an economy of oppositions scans our language, as Derrida wrote. Jennifer Bloomer is the first to see such a concept "Major" but, in our opinion, with the little development that Tafuri makes, compared to others such as "incomplete architecture", it does not justify the comparison of all those who did not doubt that Tafuri developed it. From J. Stoner's book (2012) to the epigonal comparisons of courses at Yale (2015), with respectable academics such as F. Scott or J. Till, they have aimed to move from the minor in the literature to any other ways of making in culture, that deconstruction of the architectural sense. Following a genealogical review of the writings that are linked to each other with the same fragile foundational condition in Tafuri, the aim is to determine if there is a weak argument and to evaluate the possibility that the lesser is comparable to the greater, for its usurpation. At the same time, we intend to elucidate whether when "architecture" is spoken of, it is understood on the contrary it is "space" and to promote an extension to counter-spaces and heterotopias.

Read accessible full text

Minor architecture as major architecture

Author: Tapia Martín, Carlos; Rodrigues Alves, Manoel
Publisher: Critic|all PRESS + Departamento de Proyectos Arquitectónicos (ETSAM - UPM)
Year: 2021
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/932b6fa4-5c32-489e-9be7-aabb06f58016/download
c i ic | all
2
3
2
3
EDITED: c i ic|all PRESS + Depa amen o de
P oyec os A qui ec ónicos (ETSAM - UPM)
ISBN: 978-84-09-29471-8
© 2021c i icall.
© Tex s and pho og aphs o he au ho s
This wo k is published unde C ea i e Commons Licence.
A ibu ion-NonComme cial-NonDe i s 2.5 Gene ic.
Saõ Paulo 25-26 Ma ch 2021
IV
DIGITAL PROCEEDINGS
c i ic | all
4
5
4
5
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEEORGANIZING COMMITTEE Luis Rojo
Luiz Recamán
José A agüez
Ma a Caldei a
And és Cáno as
Ma ina Co ei a
En ique de Te esa
Juan El i a
En ique Encabo
Ca men Espegel
Rica do Fabb ini
I o Gi o o
Vanessa G ossman
Juan He e os
Fe nando La a
O a io Leonidio
Ja ie Ma o o
Guioma Ma ín
Se gio Ma ín Blas
Nicolás Ma u i
Nie es Mes e
Nelson Mo a
Ma ia C is ina Nascen es Cab al
Albe o Nicolau
Claudia Pian á Cos a Cab al
Ma ia José Piza o
Ka in Rappl
Fe nando Rod íguez
Edua do Roig
Ma cos Rosa
Lize e Ma ia Rubano
Ruy Sa dinha Lopes
Ignacio Sen a
Jesús Ula gui
Jesús Vassallo
Sil ia Colmena es I Di ec o
Leand o Med ano I Di ec o
Luis Rojo I Scien i ic Commi ee coo dina o
Luiz Recaman I Scien i ic Commi ee coo dina o
Sál o a Feliz I Assis an eam
Ma iana Wilde on I Assis an eam
Raphael G azziano I Assis an eam
Akemi Mo i a I Assis an eam
Alessand o Muzi I Assis an eam
Jaime Sola es I Assis an eam
Ta iane Teles I Assis an eam
Isabel Mayo al | Digi al P oceedings layou
c i ic | all
6
7
6
7
INDEX
01
02
03
04
05
P esen a ion
Call o Pape s
Con e ence P og am
Index o selec ed pape s
Pape s
c i ic | all
c i ic | all
MT
8
8
9
back o index
01 P esen a ion
This ou h edi ion o C i ic|all Con e ence consolida es
he ini ia i e ha he A chi ec u al Design Depa men o
Mad id School o A chi ec u e ETSAM UPM s a ed some
yea s ago o p o ide an in e na ional o um o c i icism.
This ime, wi h a join e en co-o ganized wi h Facul ade de
A qui e u a e U banismo o Sao Paulo Uni e si y FAU USP,
he Con e ence enhances i s scope as a place o knowledge
p oduc ion om which o con ene ele an oices a ound he
p oposed opic a each edi ion.
We would like o hank all pa icipan s o hei wo k and us ,
as well as he membe s o he Scien i ic Commi ee o hei
e o and commi men in a qui e ha d ime o e e yone all
o e he plane .
We would like o ein o ce he idea con ained in he
con e ence’s name. C i ic|all is a call on c i icism, and also
a call o all. An appoin men ha , beyond he scope o each
edi ion, we hope will be able o enhance a mo e gene al
deba e on he ole o a chi ec u e in he p esen con ex .
Sil ia Colmena es & Leand o Med ano
Di ec o s o C i ic|all

c i ic | all
c i ic | all
MT
10
10
11
back o index
02 Call o Pape s
#dual-ec ics
The bina y s uc u e o he dual seems o ha e los i s s a us.
Too simple o hold he complexi y o ou cu en wo ld, oo
a ached o he dicho omis schema ism ha spli s posi ions
in o o and agains . Howe e , he implici symme y o he
dual should no make us o e look he ad an ages o aking
hings in pai s.
Compa ison is a he base o any in ellec ual ac i i y
commi ed o he p oduc ion o knowledge, because
meaning mos ly s ems om he obse a ion o di e ence.
As a p ima y scien i ic de ice, i gene ally add esses he
ask o con i ming o e u ing a ce ain hypo hesis o heo y.
By poin ing ou he coincidence o di e gence be ween he
wo e ms o he compa ison, i ends o ely on a logic o
causali y in o de o p oceed owa ds a gene aliza ion. Ye ,
in i s ba es o m, compa ison can also pu sue a pu ely
in e p e i e goal. Such is he case o analogy, based on he
p emise ha he wo e ms pa alleled a e no a all equal,
excep om a speci ic poin o iew. Analogic easoning
p oceeds om he pa icula owa ds he pa icula . F om
a o mal logic s ance, i lacks any demons a i e capaci y
because i elies, no on he p obable, bu on he plausible.
The es ablishmen o a causal ela ionship, a de ac o link
be ween he couple conside ed, is no as ele an as he
hings ha can be lea ned when looking a each one in he
ligh o he o he .
The pai ing o images has a long adi ion in he his o y
o a . Pendan pain ings consis o wo pic u es ha a e
composi ionally and iconog aphically ela ed as a pai bu
a e no a ached o each o he he way hinged dip ychs
a e. They hang o s and side by side bu sepa a ely and
au onomously. The e m de i es om he F ench ph ase
ai e pendan , adop ed o exp ess he idea o one hanging
o depending om he o he , and e ol ed in o ‘pandam’ o
designa e he dual na u e o any disposi ion consis ing o
wo undamen ally simila a pieces bu di e en in de ail,
which bo h ely on each o he o make ull meaning o one
ano he .
Meaning ul a gumen s dealing wi h a dual s uc u e o
he subjec ma e need o add ess esemblance and
coincidence as well as dissimili ude and di e gence.
Co ela ion is always a ques ion o p opo ion: How much
o ‘ his’ is p esen in ‘ ha ’?
The con on a ion o wo objec s, concep s, au ho s o
wo ks does no necessa ily imply an opposi ional choice.
When pu in o p ac ice by exempli ying exclusiona y e ms,
compa ison migh only lead o he con i ma ion o p e ious
con ic ions and he enuncia ion o alue judgemen s.
Ins ead, we sugges ha placing wo hings ace o ace can
be bo h sys ema ic and emain open o unexpec ed esul s.
A p ocedu e clea ly ela ed o he p ac ice o dialogue.
Any dialogue implies wo logoi o easons ha ag ee a
leas o discuss a disag eemen . Pla o ook his echnique
o i s highes le el as a means o push any a gumen a ion
o wa d. Such a dialec ical mode o hinking always
implies a sense o ans o ma ion. The e o e, dialec ics
aises as a sel -conscious p ocess which, by con on ing
he consequences o he simul aneous a i ma ion and
nega ion o a p oposi ion, achie es a ce ain explana ion
o his con adic ion h ough a syn hesis. Today, e en i
his ‘ esolu i e’ app oach migh be ques ioned, we mus
s ill acknowledge one eal e ec o dialec ics: i o ces us o
emain c i ical owa ds eali y.
We p opose o ca y ou a c i ique based on a duali y ha
a oids he oscilla o y pendulum o al e na i e sides as
much as i a oids he need o supe sede his opposi ion
wi h a hi d e m. An exe cise in shee compa ison, in he
mids o oday’s g owing complexi ies and mul iplici ies, ha
migh lead o a deepe unde s anding o ou discipline.
c i ic | all
12
13 back o index
c i ic | all
MT
12 back o index
03 Con e ence
P og am
S en-Olo Wallens ein
P o esso o Philosophy
Söde ö n Uni e si y, S ockholm
B eak (15’)
panel #1
The dialec ics o he case I
Ca helijne Nuijsink
ETH Zü ich. Swi ze land
Guille mo Lockha
Uni e sidad Poli écnica de Mad id, ETSAM,
Mad id, Spain
Angelica Ponzio
Uni e sidade Fede al do Rio g ande do Sul,
Po o Aleg e, B azil
And ea Machado
Uni e sidade Fede al do Rio g ande do Su,
Po o Aleg e, B azil
Bá ba a Salaza
Pon i icia Uni e sidad Ca ólica de Chile,
San iago, Chile
Conduc ed by: Vanessa G ossman
TUDel
Lunch ime
panel #2
The dialec ics o he case II
Suelen Came in
Fede al Uni e si y o Rio G ande do Sul,
Po o Aleg e, B azil
Juan Alejand o Salda iaga Sie a
Uni e sidad Nacional de Colombia,
Medellín, Colombia
Ca los Edua do Comas
Fede al Uni e si y o Rio G ande do Sul,
Po o Aleg e, B azil
Fe nanda Ca lo ich
Columbia Uni e si y,
New Yo k, EEUU
Conduc ed by: Ma ina Co eia
UFRJ
B eak (15’)
Welcome and P esen a ion
Key-no e speake
“A chi ec u e and he C i ical P ojec ”
“`Disp og amming`, `Plan-less`, `Non-mo emen `,
`No S yle`: Dialec ic S a egies in he Shinkenchiku
Residen ial Design Compe i ion (1965–2019)”
“(Pos ) S udio a chi ec u e: Bu en VS Wa hol”
“A Fil e o he F ame – om he enê e en longueu
o he ines a a eda a”
“Be ween a house and a museum: Rede ining an
eme ging ypology o exhibi ion”
Discussion
“T us in b ick: pa allels be ween Dies e and Bení ez/
Cab al”
“The In-be ween p ac ice. La F agua and P e i by
Ge mán Sampe Gnecco (1958-1969)”
“The Sesc P ojec : A Tale o Two Uni s”
“T a eling Dome. Claims and climbs o e Lebanese
and B azilian domes”
Discussion
THURSDAY 25·03·2021
All schedule indica es local ime Sao Paolo. B azil
(UTC/GMT -3 hou s)
09:00 - 09:30
09:30 - 10:30
10:30 - 10:45
10:45 - 12:15
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
12:15 - 13:00
13:00 - 14:30
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:30 - 14:45
c i ic | all
c i ic | all
14
15 back o index
back o index
panel #3
Iden i y Cons uc ion ( h ough di e ence) I
Guilhe me Wisnik
São Paulo S a e Uni e si y, USP,
B azil
Luana Ca alcan e + Raquel Paulino
Uni e si y o Po o, Po ugal
Rica do Pai a
Fede al Uni e si y o Cea á, B azil
Daniela Mo o
Fede al Uni e si y o Rio G ande do Sul,
Po o Aleg e, B azil
Alice Quei oz
Uni e sidade Es adual de Minas Ge ais,
Minas Ge ais, B azil
E ic C e els
Technische Uni e si ei Del ,
Del , Ne he lands
Conduc ed by: Nelson Mo a
TUDel
B eak (15’)
panel #4
Iden i y Cons uc ion ( h ough di e ence) II
Ra ael U ano F ajndlich + Gab iel Rome o +
Fe nando Ca ichioli
Unicamp, Campinas, B azil
Ad iana Pablos
GSD Ha a d, Camb idge, EEUU
Jale Sa i
Yasa Uni e si y, Tu key
Jesús U illas Ace e e
Uni e sidad Poli écnica de Mad id,
Mad id, Spain
Conduc ed by: Ma cos Rosa
FAUUSP
B eak (30’)
Ga e h Dohe y
Di ec o o he Mas e
in Landscape A chi ec u e P og am,
GSD, Ha a d
Ca men Espegel
Full P o esso A chi ec u al Design Depa men and
Di ec o o he Mas e in Ad anced A chi ec u al
Design, MPAA. ETSAM-UPM
B eak (15’)
“Being Public in P i a e Spaces and Vice Ve sa:
B azilian A and A chi ec u e in he La e 1960s”
“(Dis)con inui ies in he ea men o he public-p i a e
in e ace in social housing p oduced in B azil and
Po ugal”
“Blu ing he map: Depic ing he ci y o Cu i iba as
bo h Spec acle and Expe ience”
“U ban P eda ion: he symbolic economy o he pixo”
Discussion
“The Dialec ics o Na ional and In e na ional in Osca
Niemeye ’s ca ee : on his connec ions in he Uni ed
S a es o Ame ica (1938-1947)”
“Adap a ion: Ubiqui ous and Mono unc ional
Mode nis Residen ial Dis ic ”
“F om one Lou e o ano he : cul u al cons uc s o
he sel h ough he o he ”
“Åzone Fu u es Ma ke . Inse Cåin o S a Playing”
Discussion
Key-no e speake
“C i ical Landscapes”
Key-no e speake
“No limi s”
14:45 - 16:15
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:15 - 16:30
16:30 – 18:00
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
18:00 - 18:30
18:30 - 19:30
09:30 - 10:30
10:30 - 10:45
panel #5
C i ical Duali ies (Me hodologies)
Ma co Salaza
Uni e sidad Cen al del Ecuado ,
Qui o, Ecuado
Magda Mà ia + Sil ia Musque a
Uni e si a Poli ècnica de Ca alunya,
Ba celona, Spain
Gab iel Elias de Souza
Uni e sidade Fede al Ru al do Rio de Janei o,
UFRRJ, B azil
Nikola Ma e ski
Uni e si y o São Paulo, B azil
Conduc ed by: Se gio Ma ín Blas
ETSAM-UPM
Lunch ime
panel #6
Concep ual Cons uc ions ( h ough di e ence)
Ma in Cajade
Facul ad de A qui ec u a, Diseño y U banismo, FADU
Uni e sidad de la República, Mon e ideo, U uguay
Sil ana Cas o Nicolli
Pon i icia Uni e sidade Ca olica do Rio de Janei o,
PUC-Rio, B azil
Se gio Mo omu a + Ro eni Dua e
S a e Uni e si y o Lond ina, B azil
Conduc ed by: Guioma Ma ín
ETSAM-UPM
B eak (30’)
panel #7
Ex eme Duali ies (A es o he me hodology)
Ma ia Paula Recena
Fede al Uni e si y o Rio G ande do Sul,
Po o Aleg e, B azil
Felipe Fe la Da Cos a + Ma ia Paula Recena
Fede al Uni e si y o Rio G ande do Sul,
Po o Aleg e, B azil
Peng Xue
Uni e si y o Edinbu gh, Uni ed Kingdom
Daniel Mo illa + Espe anza Campaña Ba que o
Umeå Uni e si y, Sweden
Conduc ed by: Ignacio Sen a
ETSAM-UPM
B eak (15’)
Tom A e mae e
Chai o he His o y and Theo y o U ban Design
ETH Zü ich
“Specula ions on (Con) empo a y Domes ic
A chi ec u e: Poli ics, Domes ici y, and he I ele ance
o A chi ec u e in Two Rolling P ojec s”
“Lea ning by compa ing”
“The a chi ec ’s book as sel -p omo ion and sel -
p oduc ion: con as ing Rem Koolhaas S, M, L, XL
and Bja ke Ingel’s Yes is Mo e”
“Rep esen ing a chi ec u e on ilm. The case o
Robe o Rossellini and Cen e Pompidou”
Discussion
“USA Neighbou hood Uni s USSR Mic o ayon: A
Cold Wa ba le o he ul ima e u ban p ojec o he
wen ie h cen u y”
“Na u e and Re e sed Mimesis in Toyo I o’s
A chi ec u e”
“Decomposi ion o he hie a chical sys em: duali ies in
SANAA a chi ec u e”
Discussion
“Elemen s o A chi ec u e and Cho eog aphic Objec s:
a new c i ical iewpoin ”
“Eisenman e Reich: con luences and di e gences
be ween o mal
ope a ions”
“A Radical Dual-ec ics o U ban Fo mula ion. Dashila
as a He e o opic Pa ne o he Fo bidden Ci y”
“Co se and Domes ic Space: O ho-a chi ec u al
Exoskele ons in he Disciplina y E a”
Discussion
Key-no e speake
“A chi ec u e ‘Talks Back’: On he (Im Possibili ies o a
C i ical A chi ec u al P ojec ”
10:45 - 12:15
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
12:15 - 13:00
13:00 -14:30
13:00
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:15 - 14:45
14:45 – 16:15
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:15 - 16:30
16:30 - 17:30
FRIDAY 26·03·2021
All schedule indica es local ime Sao Paolo. B azil
(UTC/GMT -3 hou s)
c i ic | all
16
17 back o index
c i ic | all
MT
16 back o index
04 Index
o selec ed
pape s
A ba a, Sophia
Calzado López, Rocio
As udillo Saco o, Ped o Es eban
Be nacchi, An onio
Lazza oni, Alicia
Cajade, Ma in
Came in, Suelen
Ca lo ich, Fe nanda
Ca u he s, Luz
G aschinsky, Da ío
Ca alho, B uno
Cas o, Caio
Cas o Nicolli, Sil ana
Ca alcan e, Luana
Paulino, Raquel
Pai a, Rica do
Comas, Ca los Edua do
Cos a, Fede ico
Cos a, Phillipe
De Miguel, Ma ía
Delgado, Fe nando
Días Gomes, Julia
Días Gomes, Le icia
Dias, So ía
Sschmid, Aloísio
Diniz, Ma ia Luisa Consal e
Dua e, Ro eni
In be ween a nomadic and a seden a y p ac ice
The EU case.
Escola Paulis a geneaology.
Building S o ies and W i ing P ojec s
Specula i e Ecoc i icism h ough Design.
USA Neighbou hood Uni s USSR Mic o ayon.
T us in b ick: pa allels be ween Eladio Dies e and
Gabine e de A qui ec u a.
T a eling Dome. Claims and climbs o e Lebanese
and B azilian domes.
Doppelgänge A chi ec u e. The Dialec ical Pai o
he Dialec ics o he Pai .
Memo y museums as ep esen a i e places in La in
Ame ica.
Two design solu ions in Lisbon a ound a ail o e -
pass and he i e on .
Na u e and Re e sed Mimesis in Toyo I o’s
A chi ec u e.
(Dis)con inui ies in he public-p i a e in e ace:
he case o he p ojec s o Ca aíba by Joaquim
Guedes in B azil and Malaguei a by Ál a o Siza
in Po ugal.
The SESC p ojec : a ale o wo uni s.
Encla es o ci iliza ion. Mode n monumen s o Lina
Bo Ba di and Osca Niemeye in and agains he
me opolis.Space and he o he ness.
In o ma ion Tec onics. A C i ical Re iew o Digi al
and Hyb id Technologies in A chi ec u e.
Beds wi hou bed ooms.
F agmen s o his o y in Paulo Mendes da Rocha’s
Chapel o Sain Pe e .
The ela ion be ween common and epheme al:
a c i ic analysis abou he concep s.
Social ba ie ega ding ene gy: c i ical analysis
om a dual pe spec i e.
Two pe spec i es on design cul u e. F om a chi ec-
u al design o me adesign.
22
29
41
48
58
68
79
87
96
106
116
127
135
144
152
159
169
178
186
Au ho s Pape s pag.
c i ic | all
c i ic | all
590
591 back o index
back o index
In
he second case, he empo al displacemen gene a es an ea hquake owa ds he pas ha
wou
ld, when he wa e comes back a ound, gi e he eac ion a g ea e ampli ude o sense han i had
in i
s ime. Tha is why we said ha i s con empo anei y was no clea . Like Pla o po ayed as
Leona
do, his would de ine one mo e symp om o dispe sion and unce ain y in e ms o he momen
a
nd a chi ec u e, bu i would gi e c edi o he mino ac ion. Bu we ha e al eady said ha such ac ion
also has
o ela e o he compa ison wi h i s becoming, which S one es ablishes in he e ision o 4
ba
sic my hs in indi idual chap e s: ha o he objec , he subjec , in e io , and na u e. Wha is s ange
abo
u he ea men o hese my hs in he book is ha he e is no clea e e ence o he momen o o
he
mos e ealing li e a u e ha highligh s he a chi ec u al impulse due o he secula in a iance o
hese
my hs10. Pe haps i is Rykwe 's eading o ha o na u e, bu he e is only one men ion o
Luc e i
us in a no e. And we know no hing o he my h o he in e io , pe haps Pla onic. The e iew by
B
emne & Till (2012) on S one 's book does no doub ha his ca ego iza ion o he ou my hs has
a
pe inen a ilia ion wi h he his o y o a chi ec u e, wi hou needing o e i y i s o igin. The ac is
ha
, based on hem, S one makes i possible o mino a chi ec u e o become a playing ield, o i s
in
e io s o beha e like escapes, o he na u al u h ( ha pain ed by Raphael) o be shown in
ea
ch building h ough de e i o ializa ion, and o a chi ec u al subjec s o be de ined by hei
ela i
onships. The eil en ails dissidence, bu also agili y, le us no o ge . I is no ha we wan o
delegi
imize his p oposal o Bloome and S one o o he mino whe e e i is shown. Ou in en ion is
o
achie e mo e igo ous p ecision. So, le us be like Bloome in his: KAFKA.
6.
Looking up wi h you eyes closed: doing (and no jus eading) mino a chi ec u e
"I dan
ced a 'Ca é Mülle '. We all had ou eyes closed. When we did a epea , I couldn' ge he eeling o wha was new, how
impo
an i was o me. Suddenly, I ealized ha i makes a big di e ence, behind closed eyelids, i I look down o up.
Tha makes a di e ence! The igh eeling comes immedia ely. The smalles de ail ma e s. I 's a language you can lea n o
ead.
Ca é Mülle dancing. PINA, a ilm by Wim Wende s. 2013. Abou Pina Bausch, cho eog aphe .
Based
on some d awings ha Ka ka made be ween 1907 and 1917 (Fig.4), Deleuze&Gua a i
(19
75:14) gene a e a compa ison be ween he ep esen a ions o heads ben o aised om he
s
paces ex ac ed om he no els o he au ho o "The Cas le", which also se e S one o ex ac he
my
hs wi h which he a icula es he possibili y o a mino a chi ec u e.
Fig.
3
head down
po ai -pho o
=wish blocked, submi ed o subdued, neu alized, wi h minimum connec ions,
a memo y o childhood, e i o iali y, o e e i o ializa ion.
e ec head
sound-music
=wish ha ises, o escapes, and opens o new connec ions, childhood block
o animal block, de e i o ializa ion.
Fig.
4
I s
hould be s essed ha his anking is no a inalis . The e is a whole ib a ion om one o he o he
ha
p e en s he compa ison om being elec i e. The comple e disa icula ion o he no ion o space by
b
o h spa ial ep esen a ions would make a mino a chi ec embodied in Ka ka's wo k unde s and ha o
look
a he sky is o aise one's eyes, implying spi i uali y, imma e iali y, eligion, o , con e sely, ha he
a chi
ec u e esul ing om Ka ka's unde s anding o he ben head e okes his space o be subdued,
wi h
ep essions o desi e. Bu Deleuze and Gua a i do no allow he compa ison o be se led in choice.
I
is a ma e o inding he un o med ma e ex ac ed om each exp ession, be i music o pho o so ha
he opening o de e i o ializa ion is main ained. Fo his eason, we ely on Pina Bausch's inspi a io
n:
behind closed eyes, looking up o down gi es he igh eeling. Bu i is no said which one i is, i
is no
elec i e.
To conclude, somewha has ily because o he limi ed space a ailable he e, we would like o app oa
ch
wha we belie e would de ine a mino wo k in a chi ec u e, in he sense ha hese pages h
a e
ga he ed om di e en imes and au ho s: he Ob ado In e nacional de D ama u gia, Tea o
Sala
Becke , by he a chi ec s E a P a s and Rica do Flo es. We do his because he e is also a mino
hea e, as Sanchís Sinis e a has said, and i is linked o Becke himsel 11. E e y hing seems o be
an
ex ension o wha Bloome and S one said, bu e ised as a dis o ion, as his example is one o
he
mos success ul ways o he mino o appea , as a conc e e a chi ec u al p ojec ac ion, a wo k, whi
ch
is some hing ha is missing in he ex s o Bloome and S one .
Fig 5.
Le us look a Figu e 5. The cons i u ion o he sky is es ablished by he b eaking o all limi s. We
mus
no look up, bu i we do, we will see he a chi ec s lying like a a en who does no admi he bina
y,
who disin eg a es he compa able. We see i in he s o ies supe imposed on he echo o he ag
men s
hus ound whe e space eaches p esence. Whe e is he Leona do he e, in ou ime? He is no he e
o
conque an o de , jus as he was no when he usu ped Pla o's body. We will say i
wi h he wo ds o
Juan José Lahue a (2017) ega ding his same wo k: he Becke Room "is an ex ao dina y exe ci
se
o ecogni ion, which eminds me o he ad ice ha Leona do ga e o pain e s: look a he ba k on
he
ees, a he shapes o he clouds, a he pa ches o damp on he walls, o see in hem g ea o ms
o
moun ains, alleys, and i e s, o cha ac e s and ho ses, g ea s o ies.” To consis o a chi ec u e
in
Flo es & P a s, in he mino ha esis s and expands a he same ime, as Lahue a says, ele a es
he
wo k om being a commodi y o being " he eal hing". Pe haps, i i e e s ops i s inhe en in ini
e
beam o exci emen .

c i ic | all
c i ic | all
592
593 back o index
back o index
No es
1
This is li e al: "Behold, one day, passing by he wall whe e he gods ac , I hea d. I was i esis ibly cu ious..." Le Co busie , The
Modu
lo 2, las sen ence on he las page o he book.
2
Wi h he in en ion o a oiding a possible accusa ion o being simplis ic by a ibu ing he ac ions in con lic wi h eeling and
hinking
o he wo k o he a chi ec , we will e eal ha ou in en ion is o make he deba e p e ail as an a gumen a his momen
abou
wha i is o do a chi ec u e, unde consciousness and heo e ical unde s anding o abou he c a and sensa ion. When
G
oe he saw S asbou g Ca hed al o he i s ime, he was amazed by i s beau y and us a ed a no echnically unde s anding
i s
composi ional keys. He exp essed his in w i ing in 1772. His con lic be ween eason and sensa ion, as desc ibed by
Rykwe
in "Adam's Cabin in Pa adise" (1999:109), was conju ed up when he ques ioned his men o , Abbé Laugie , abou i .
Ca lo Lodo
li, he "Soc a es o A chi ec u e", could also ha e been he objec o his denuncia ion. The ision o he ca hed al, a
he same ime in ecs asy and uneasiness, made Goe he exclaim ha hea en should p o oke his same duali y and he ga e
he
a chi ec u al disciplina y body he ask o he u u e: "Mul iply, pie ce he gigan ic walls ha you mus aise agains he sky
so
ha hey ascend like sublime and lea y ees o God, whose housand b anches, millions o lea es and wigs ... announce he
beau y
o he Lo d, his owne ...”. Much ea lie , and Goe he (who, by he way, is ecognized as he ounde o mode n
compa a
i e mo phology), could ha e econciled himsel wi h ha ing hough abou ha i s mode nis who was B unelleschi,
who
cla i ied by eplacemen he Go hic emphasis in he Pazzi Chapel in Flo ence h ough a mys ical ision o Hea en bu wi h a
ampan lucidi y o a ionali y om his o y and geome y (Chak abo y, 2014:42).
3
Maybe ha is why bo h J. Que glas and B. Colomina wan ed o p opose A iadne as he i s a chi ec . Thei a emp is co-
esponsible
wi h he spi i o he Daedalus, al hough he a gumen is weakened by being shown as a anking, when in ac i is
no
necessa y.
4
Acco ding o Deleuze and Gua a i, oedipaliza ion cons i u es an illegi ima e limi a ion o he p oduc i e syn heses o he
un
conscious, because i emphasizes 1) global pe sons, hus excluding all pa en al objec s o desi e, 2) exclusi e
disjun
c ions, hus banishing he subjec o a ch onological se ies o momen s o which a cohe en na a i e can be gi en, and 3) a
seg
ega i e and biuni ocal use o conjunc i e syn heses, hus educing he subjec 's iden i y o a cohe en o s a ic se o one
s
ide in a se o opposi ions.
5
Fo hose who a e in e es ed in s udying a chi ec u e in-dep h, we would like o poin ou ha ou esea ch has been based
o
n ou wo k as p o esso s in he Mas e 's Deg ee in Sus ainable Ci y and A chi ec u e a he School o A chi ec u e in Se ille,
Spa
in. Fo he subjec ha seeks o ain ou s uden s in esea ch, we p oposed ha hey spend one academic yea wo king on
he
concep o "Mino A chi ec u e". This esea ch, sha ed be ween p o esso s (J. López-Can i, F. De la Iglesia, and C. Tapia)
a
nd s uden s, has gi en excellen esul s ha ha e been uploaded o Wikipedia o in e na ional deba e in Spanish. I con ains
he genealogy o he e m in di e en au ho s and ex s ha we ha e used he e, excep wi hou ha aceabili y as an a gumen ,
b
u as necessa y sou ces, a he end o his pape . Fo mo e in o ma ion, see he a icle "De eni meno en lo a qui ec ónico:
pol
i ización y po encialidades de esigni icación espacial" in Thema, 5. FADU Mon e ideo, No embe 2020, signed by he
pa
icipa ing s uden s.
6
No e he e ha i is no only a ma e o inding ou , in o de o e alua e he ex en o he dissemina ion o so-called F ench
Th
eo y in Ame ican li e a u e depa men s, which o hem changed hei s udy p og ams bu also o acing he aining o he
a ch
i ec s who la e ook cha ge o he de elopmen o he mos in luen ial a chi ec u al heo y in he Uni ed S a es and ab oad.
Many
o hem had been ained wi h eaching p og ams coming om Li e a u e, in ins i u ions ha did no ain a chi ec s. Michael
Speaks,
o example, dean o he Sy acuse and Ken ucky Schools o A chi ec u e, among o he s h oughou his ca ee , s udied
li e a u e
wi h F. Jameson a Duke, in a p og am whe e Te y Eagle on S. Žižek, F anco Mo e i, e c. also augh . Speaks,
in e
iewed by Mi ášo á (2014:358) ecalls ha , in hose yea s, philosophy was basically analy ical, incapable o gene a ing
heo y, and ha F ench pos s uc u alis hough en e ed No h Ame ica h ough hese depa men s in Li e a u e. Acco ding
o
Cusse (2005:90), as philosophy becomes li e a u e, li e a u e becomes a me e pa cel o heo y. This p ocess o
indis in
c ion o he li e a y and philosophical co pus was no immedia e and, mo eo e , equi ed he ins i u ional appa a us o ,
among
o he s, he i s in e depa men al esea ch ins i u es, o he eg oupings be ween campuses, such as he in luen ial
S
chool o C i icism and Theo y, in I ine.
7
A chi ec u al a emp s since Ka ka's eadings ha e been many. Bo ill, o example, made se e al a emp s ha should be
con
side ed he bes o his p oli ic and con adic o y ca ee . Bu o us, o look o Ka ka means o pull back he g ow h a ound him
o
see his p imo dial s em again.
8
1988 is a unique da e o he es ablishmen o Theo y wi hin he schools o a chi ec u e. In an e en o ganized by his
Ins i u e
and published by he magazine Assemblage, all i s pa icipan s decla ed hemsel es o be heo is s o a chi ec u e,
nei
he a chi ec s who w i e no c i ics, no his o ians. Two yea s la e , he MoMA was al eady holding a symposium on
a ch
i ec u al heo y and p ac ice, consec a ing i . Jenni e Bloome was one o he speake s.
9
See, "A chi ec u e depends", lo- i a chi ec u e concep e sus hi- i a chi ec u e. I is ob ious o poin ou he p esence o he
he
sis o he mino con on ed wi h he majo also in his wo k.
10
In My hologies, Ba hes says ha he my h b ings cla i ica ion, hough no qui e an explana ion, which is wha S one could
a gue
o jus i y he way she esol es he ma e wi hou naming he o igin o he selec ed my hs. Howe e , Ba hes goes on o
say
ha my h is also a s a emen o ac , so he in e nal eco d mus be made isible a some poin . Lebbeus Woods wo ked
wi h
hese my hs, as did John Hejduk, and hey can be econs i u ed om hei ace bic o al na a i e adi ions whe e beings
ha embody na u e o he human condi ion exal i o make he cha ac e s ex ao dina y beings and unique a chi ec u al
eso
lu ions.
11
"As opposed o he no ion o he cha ac e as some hing compac , a mo e o less schema ic ansc ip o a comple e human
being,
ep esen a i e o a ce ain sociological o psychological a che ype, mino hea icali y accep s he incomple e
condi ion
o he d ama ic cha ac e , his pa ial and enigma ic cha ac e , e ealing only a minimal pa o himsel . The
Be
cke ian image o he mu ila ed, blind cha ac e , educed o a ace, a mou h, a oice... has o do wi h his educ ionism, wi h
his
mino isa ion o he concep o he cha ac e . A concep , by he way, ha , by iden i ying wi h he no ion o pe son, is highly
ideo
logized in ou
Judeo-Ch is ian-Romano-Wes e n
adi ion. All he ques ioning o he sel , o he subjec , unde aken by
con e
mpo a y hough , is e lec ed in he ea men o he cha ac e as a esidue, as some hing incomple e and un inished ha
mino
hea icali y ad oca es." Towa d a Mino Thea icali y. Sanchís Sinis e a (2007).
Image Cap ions
Fig. 1.
Ra aello Sanzio “The School o A hens” (1509-1510). S anza della Signa u a. Va ican. Wikipedia Commons.
Fig. 2. Flamma ion eng a ing. Book by Camille Flamma ion, L'A mosphe e: Mé éo ologie Populai e (Pa is, 18
88) pp.163
Fig. 3. The D awings o F anz Ka ka (1907
-1917). Pe sonal Pape s. Unpublished.
Fig. 4. Towa d a Mino Li e a u e. Book by Deleuze&Gua a i. Exce p pp. 14.
Fig. 5. Ob ado In e nacional de D ama u gia, Tea o Sala Becke , by he a chi ec s E a
P a s and Rica do Flo es. In e io .
Re e ences
No es
1 This is li e al: "Behold, one day, passing by he wall whe e he gods ac , I hea d. I was i esis ibly cu ious..." Le Co busie , The
Modulo 2, las sen ence on he las page o he book.
2 Wi h he in en ion o a oiding a possible accusa ion o being simplis ic by a ibu ing he ac ions in con lic wi h eeling and
hinking o he wo k o he a chi ec , we will e eal ha ou in en ion is o make he deba e p e ail as an a gumen a his momen
abou wha i is o do a chi ec u e, unde consciousness and heo e ical unde s anding o abou he c a and sensa ion. When
Goe he saw S asbou g Ca hed al o he i s ime, he was amazed by i s beau y and us a ed a no echnically unde s anding
i s composi ional keys. He exp essed his in w i ing in 1772. His con lic be ween eason and sensa ion, as desc ibed by
Rykwe in "Adam's Cabin in Pa adise" (1999:109), was conju ed up when he ques ioned his men o , Abbé Laugie , abou i .
Ca lo Lodoli, he "Soc a es o A chi ec u e", could also ha e been he objec o his denuncia ion. The ision o he ca hed al, a
he same ime in ecs asy and uneasiness, made Goe he exclaim ha hea en should p o oke his same duali y and he ga e
he a chi ec u al disciplina y body he ask o he u u e: "Mul iply, pie ce he gigan ic walls ha you mus aise agains he sky
so ha hey ascend like sublime and lea y ees o God, whose housand b anches, millions o lea es and wigs ... announce he
beau y o he Lo d, his owne ...”. Much ea lie , and Goe he (who, by he way, is ecognized as he ounde o mode n
compa a i e mo phology), could ha e econciled himsel wi h ha ing hough abou ha i s mode nis who was B unelleschi,
who cla i ied by eplacemen he Go hic emphasis in he Pazzi Chapel in Flo ence h ough a mys ical ision o Hea en bu wi h a
ampan lucidi y o a ionali y om his o y and geome y (Chak abo y, 2014:42).
3 Maybe ha is why bo h J. Que glas and B. Colomina wan ed o p opose A iadne as he i s a chi ec . Thei a emp is co-
esponsible wi h he spi i o he Daedalus, al hough he a gumen is weakened by being shown as a anking, when in ac i is
no necessa y.
4 Acco ding o Deleuze and Gua a i, oedipaliza ion cons i u es an illegi ima e limi a ion o he p oduc i e syn heses o he
unconscious, because i emphasizes 1) global pe sons, hus excluding all pa en al objec s o desi e, 2) exclusi e
disjunc ions, hus banishing he subjec o a ch onological se ies o momen s o which a cohe en na a i e can be gi en, and 3) a
seg ega i e and biuni ocal use o conjunc i e syn heses, hus educing he subjec 's iden i y o a cohe en o s a ic se o one
side in a se o opposi ions.
5 Fo hose who a e in e es ed in s udying a chi ec u e in-dep h, we would like o poin ou ha ou esea ch has been based
on ou wo k as p o esso s in he Mas e 's Deg ee in Sus ainable Ci y and A chi ec u e a he School o A chi ec u e in Se ille,
Spain. Fo he subjec ha seeks o ain ou s uden s in esea ch, we p oposed ha hey spend one academic yea wo king on
he concep o "Mino A chi ec u e". This esea ch, sha ed be ween p o esso s (J. López-Can i, F. De la Iglesia, and C. Tapia)
and s uden s, has gi en excellen esul s ha ha e been uploaded o Wikipedia o in e na ional deba e in Spanish. I con ains
he genealogy o he e m in di e en au ho s and ex s ha we ha e used he e, excep wi hou ha aceabili y as an a gumen ,
bu as necessa y sou ces, a he end o his pape . Fo mo e in o ma ion, see he a icle "De eni meno en lo a qui ec ónico:
poli ización y po encialidades de esigni icación espacial" in Thema, 5. FADU Mon e ideo, No embe 2020, signed by he
pa icipa ing s uden s.
6 No e he e ha i is no only a ma e o inding ou , in o de o e alua e he ex en o he dissemina ion o so-called F ench
Theo y in Ame ican li e a u e depa men s, which o hem changed hei s udy p og ams bu also o acing he aining o he
a chi ec s who la e ook cha ge o he de elopmen o he mos in luen ial a chi ec u al heo y in he Uni ed S a es and ab oad.
Many o hem had been ained wi h eaching p og ams coming om Li e a u e, in ins i u ions ha did no ain a chi ec s. Michael
Speaks, o example, dean o he Sy acuse and Ken ucky Schools o A chi ec u e, among o he s h oughou his ca ee , s udied
li e a u e wi h F. Jameson a Duke, in a p og am whe e Te y Eagle on S. Žižek, F anco Mo e i, e c. also augh . Speaks,
in e iewed by Mi ášo á (2014:358) ecalls ha , in hose yea s, philosophy was basically analy ical, incapable o gene a ing
heo y, and ha F ench pos s uc u alis hough en e ed No h Ame ica h ough hese depa men s in Li e a u e. Acco ding
o Cusse (2005:90), as philosophy becomes li e a u e, li e a u e becomes a me e pa cel o heo y. This p ocess o
indis inc ion o he li e a y and philosophical co pus was no immedia e and, mo eo e , equi ed he ins i u ional appa a us o ,
among o he s, he i s in e depa men al esea ch ins i u es, o he eg oupings be ween campuses, such as he in luen ial
School o C i icism and Theo y, in I ine.
7 A chi ec u al a emp s since Ka ka's eadings ha e been many. Bo ill, o example, made se e al a emp s ha should be
conside ed he bes o his p oli ic and con adic o y ca ee . Bu o us, o look o Ka ka means o pull back he g ow h a ound him
o see his p imo dial s em again.
8 1988 is a unique da e o he es ablishmen o Theo y wi hin he schools o a chi ec u e. In an e en o ganized by his
Ins i u e and published by he magazine Assemblage, all i s pa icipan s decla ed hemsel es o be heo is s o a chi ec u e,
nei he a chi ec s who w i e no c i ics, no his o ians. Two yea s la e , he MoMA was al eady holding a symposium on
a chi ec u al heo y and p ac ice, consec a ing i . Jenni e Bloome was one o he speake s.
9 See, "A chi ec u e depends", lo- i a chi ec u e concep e sus hi- i a chi ec u e. I is ob ious o poin ou he p esence o he
hesis o he mino con on ed wi h he majo also in his wo k.
10 In My hologies, Ba hes says ha he my h b ings cla i ica ion, hough no qui e an explana ion, which is wha S one could
a gue o jus i y he way she esol es he ma e wi hou naming he o igin o he selec ed my hs. Howe e , Ba hes goes on o
say ha my h is also a s a emen o ac , so he in e nal eco d mus be made isible a some poin . Lebbeus Woods wo ked
wi h hese my hs, as did John Hejduk, and hey can be econs i u ed om hei ace bic o al na a i e adi ions whe e beings
ha embody na u e o he human condi ion exal i o make he cha ac e s ex ao dina y beings and unique a chi ec u al
esolu ions.
11 "As opposed o he no ion o he cha ac e as some hing compac , a mo e o less schema ic ansc ip o a comple e human
being, ep esen a i e o a ce ain sociological o psychological a che ype, mino hea icali y accep s he incomple e
condi ion o he d ama ic cha ac e , his pa ial and enigma ic cha ac e , e ealing only a minimal pa o himsel . The
Becke ian image o he mu ila ed, blind cha ac e , educed o a ace, a mou h, a oice... has o do wi h his educ ionism, wi h
his mino isa ion o he concep o he cha ac e . A concep , by he way, ha , by iden i ying wi h he no ion o pe son, is highly
ideologized in ou
Judeo-Ch is ian-Romano-Wes e n
adi ion. All he ques ioning o he sel , o he subjec , unde aken by
con empo a y hough , is e lec ed in he ea men o he cha ac e as a esidue, as some hing incomple e and un inished ha
mino hea icali y ad oca es." Towa d a Mino Thea icali y. Sanchís Sinis e a (2007).
Image Cap ions
Fig. 1. Ra aello Sanzio “The School o A hens” (1509-1510). S anza della Signa u a. Va ican. Wikipedia Commons.
Fig. 2. Flamma ion eng a ing. Book by Camille Flamma ion, L'A mosphe e: Mé éo ologie Populai e (Pa is, 1888) pp.163
Fig. 3. The D awings o F anz Ka ka (1907-1917). Pe sonal Pape s. Unpublished.
Fig. 4. Towa d a Mino Li e a u e. Book by Deleuze&Gua a i. Exce p pp. 14.
Fig. 5. Ob ado In e nacional de D ama u gia, Tea o Sala Becke , by he a chi ec s E a P a s and Rica do Flo es. In e io .
Re e ences
Bloom, Ha old. Genios: Un Mosaico de Cien Men es C ea i as y Ejempla es. Biog a íasas y documen os. G upo Edi o ial
No ma, 2005.
Bloome , Jenni e . “Abodes o Theo y and Flesh: Tabbles o Bowe .” Assemblage 17, no. 17 (1992): 6.
Bloome , Jenni e . “A lay a s one a pa ch a pos a pen he uddy un: Mino A chi ec u al Possibili ies”. In: Bu de ,
Richa d S a egies in a chi ec u al hinking Camb idge/London: MIT P ess, 1992. 48-67
Bloome , Jenni e . A chi ec u e and he ex : The (S)c yp s o Joyce and Pi anesi. Yale Uni e si y P ess. 1993.
B emne , Lindsay, and Je emy Till. “A C acking Read: Towa d a Mino A chi ec u e by Jill S one ” (2020): 1–4.
B emne , Lindsay. “Towa ds a Mino Global A chi ec u e a Lamu, Kenya.” Social Dynamics 39, no. 3 (2013): 397–413.
Colomina, B, J Bloome , M Mo is, L Mul ey, P ince on Uni e si y. School o a chi ec u e, u ban planning. Colloque, P Whi e,
NJ) o A chi ec u e (P ince on, L Spigel, and V Bu gin. Sexuali y & Space. Pape s on A chi ec u e. P ince on A chi ec u al
P ess, 1992.
Cusse , F ançois. F ench Theo y: How Foucaul , De ida, Deleuze, & Co. T ans o med he In ellec ual Li e o he Uni ed S a es.
Uni e si y o Minneso a P ess, 2008.
Deleuze, Gilles; Gua a i, Felix. Ka ka Po Una Li e a u a Meno . México D.F., México: Ediciones E a, 1990.
De ida, Jacques. No Esc ibo Sin Luz A i icial. Cua o (Valladolid, Spain). Cua o Ediciones, 1999.
De ida, Jacques. Posiciones: En e is as Con Hen i Ronse, Julia K is e a, Jean-Louis Houdebine y Guy Sca pe a. P e- ex os.
P e-Tex os, 1977.
Foucaul , M. La A queología Del Sabe . Teo ía (Mexico Ci y, Mexico). Siglo XXI, 2013.
Jalón Oya zun, Lucía. “Common Spa iali ies: The P oduc ion o he Mul i ude.” Foo p in , no. 16 (2015): 51–68.
Jalón Oya zun, Lucía. “Épicas Meno es y A ec o Común” (1955).
Jalón Oya zun, Lucía. “The Mino Composi ion o Th eshold Domes.” MONU 24 Domes ic U banism. Ro e dam, 2016.
h p://www.monu-magazine.com/issues.h m.
Jalón Oya zun, Lucía. “Nigh as Commons: Mino A chi ec u e and Day a ing Ci izens.” Scapegoa : A chi ec u e / Landscape /
Poli ical Economy, no. 10 (2016): 57–70.
Jalón Oya zun, Lucía. “INSIGNIFICANCE AND MINOR ARCHITECTURE” (n.d.).
James-Chak abo y, K. A chi ec u e Since 1400. Uni e si y o Minneso a P ess, 2014.
Jay, Ma in. Ojos Aba idos: La Denig ación de La Visión En El Pensamien o F ancés Del Siglo XX. T es Can os (Mad id): Akal,
1993.
Ka z, Cindi. “Towa ds Mino Theo y.” En i onmen and Planning D: Socie y and Space 14, no. 4 (1996): 487–499.
Lahue a, Juan José. “Residua. Obbligo e In enzione: Un’ope a Recen e Di Flo es & P a s.” Casabella 875–876 (2017): 50–51.
McCaw, Jane . “A chi ec u al (S)C yp s: In Sea ch o a Mino A chi ec u e.” A chi ec u al Theo y Re iew 4, no. 1 (1999): 19–33.
McEwen, I K. Soc a es’ Ances o : An Essay on A chi ec u al Beginnings. MIT P ess, 1993.
Mi ášo á, M. Oxymo on and Pleonasm: Con e sa ions on Ame ican C i ical and P ojec i e Theo y o A chi ec u e. Ac a , 2014.
Sanchís Sinis e a, José. “Po Una Tea alidad Meno .” Ro oscopio. Las modi ied 2013.
h ps:// o oscopio.wo dp ess.com/2013/04/07/po -una- ea alidad-meno -jose-sanchis-sinis e a/.
Slo e dijk, Pe e . C í ica de La Razón Cínica. Biblio eca de Ensayo / Se ie mayo . Si uela, 2003.
S one , Jill. Hacia Una A qui ec u a Meno . Ba leboo h, 2018. English e sion: S one , J. Towa d A Mino A chi ec u e. The MIT
P ess. MIT P ess, 2012.
Ta u i, Man edo. Teo ías e His o ia de La A qui ec u a. Mad id: Celes e, 1997. English e sion: Ta u i, M. Théo ies e His oi e
de l’a chi ec u e. Édi ions SADG, 1976.
Tapia, Ca los, López-Ma cos, Ma a. Nega i es Denken. Con aespacios e impolí ica pa a una e isión (¿c í ica?) del es a u o
de la a qui ec u a. I In e na ional Con e ence on A chi ec u al Design and C i icism. 2014
Tapia, Ca los. “A qui ec u a y emancipación”. 2019. Thema 3, 150-157