scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Application of integrated building simulation and CFD to a classroom heating case study in a mediterranean climate

Abstract

This study develops knowledge of the methodological analysis of indoor air distribution in high density rooms, allowing evaluation of the expected comfort level of the occupants. A typical classroom is presented as a case study, focusing on the influence of dedicated ventilation. The methodology established the boundary conditions using discretization and determination of values over time which defined the dynamic energy behaviour of the room, by means of a nodal model. The study incorporates sectional isothermal curves and air velocity analysis, the use of indicators to evaluate the thermal comfort of the occupants according to ASHRAE standards, and comparisons of alternative HVAC systems. A case study application shows poor efficiency of traditional radiator heating systems versus those which incorporate a neutral ventilation air supply.

Read accessible full text

Application of integrated building simulation and CFD to a classroom heating case study in a mediterranean climate

Author: Campano, Miguel Ángel; Domínguez Amarillo, Samuel; Fernández-Agüera, Jessica; Sendra, Juan J.
Year: 2012
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/14c02ad5-c9ef-4862-a892-711bd4be6a48/download
APPLICATION OF INTEGRATED BUILDING SIMULATION AND CFD TO A
CLASSROOM HEATING CASE STUDY IN A MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE
Miguel A. Campano*1, Samuel Domínguez1, Jesica Fe nández-Agüe a1, Juan J. Send a1
Ins i u e o A chi ec u e and Building Science, Se ille, Spain
2 Reina Me cedes A enue, Se ille 41012, ES.
*E-mail add ess: mcamp[email p o ec ed]s
ABSTRACT
This s udy de elops knowledge o he me hodological
analysis o indoo ai dis ibu ion in high densi y
ooms, allowing e alua ion o he expec ed com o
le el o he occupan s. A ypical class oom is p esen ed
as a case s udy, ocusing on he in luence o dedica ed
en ila ion. The me hodology es ablished he bounda y
condi ions using disc e iza ion and de e mina ion o
alues o e ime which de ined he dynamic ene gy
beha iou o he oom, by means o a nodal model.
The s udy inco po a es sec ional iso he mal cu es and
ai eloci y analysis, he use o indica o s o e alua e
he he mal com o o he occupan s acco ding o
ASHRAE s anda ds, and compa isons o al e na i e
HVAC sys ems.
A case s udy applica ion shows poo e iciency o
adi ional adia o hea ing sys ems e sus hose which
inco po a e a neu al en ila ion ai supply.
INTRODUCTION
HVAC sys ems a e always designed o sol e he
equa ion o balance be ween ene gy demand and he
powe supplied o he space. Usually, his solu ion is
ca ied ou by assuming he ans e is be ween wo
disc e e poin s, one in e nal and one ex e nal.
Howe e , he spaces o be deal wi h a e olumes
whe e he occupan s usually ha e eedom o
mo emen o loca ion, wi h mul iple poin s whe e his
ene gy load-con ibu ion a io does no beha e as in
he o iginally o eseen model. This p oblem is c i ical
in e alua ing wo linked concep s: he e iciency o
deli e ing ene gy o he sys em o he olume
occupied, and he eal com o o he di e en
occupan s acco ding o hei spa ial dis ibu ion in he
olume.
Al hough he e a e many me hods o calcula ing he
ans e equa ions o a he mal sys em, hese a e
achie ed wi h a nodal model, whe e i is no possible o
know wha he ene gy dis ibu ion will be wi hin he
space, wi hou es ablishing a spa ial model based on
CFD (Zhai, Z.J. e al). The gene a ion o hese models
allows he ene gy e iciency o he building o be
e alua ed, and i s ene gy dis ibu ion o be analysed,
by conside ing he enues as h ee-dimensional spaces
whe e occupan s, u ni u e, equipmen and o he hea
sou ces a e ac i e in he sys em.
This wo k is p esen ed wi h his ocus, and has sough
o de elop a me hodology o connec ing he nodal
analysis esul s, ep esen ing he empo al e olu ion o
he ene gy s a es o he building-HVAC-ex e io
sys em, and i s impac on di e en s a es o he in e io
space.
A school building was chosen as he applica ion model,
because a class oom ep esen s a space wi h p oblems
ha a e ypical o hose o be analysed, due o i s high
in e nal load, high en ila ion (ISO 13779:2008 on
Ven ila ion o non- esiden ial buildings) and high
com o needs and p olonged use o e ime. The
e olu ion o i s beha iou o e a ypical day is a
pa icula ly impo an ac o , gi en he in luence o he
posi i e loads associa ed wi h he use o he space
(Ka imipanah, T. e al).
This s udy is p esen ed as he nex s ep in he wo king
me hodology begun in "Analysis o he mal emissions
om adia o s in class ooms in Medi e anean
clima es" and i inco po a es new analy ical ools and
b oadens he ield o s udy o include he in luence o
mechanical en ila ion. The wo k uses a se ies o
indica o s, among which he Fange me hod is
highligh ed, and is supplemen ed wi h a se ies o linea
g aphs o he mal a ia ions.
The inal objec i e o his wo k is he de elopmen o a
me hodology o unde ake compa a i e s udies
be ween HVAC sys ems, enabling decision making
based on he esul s o ene gy dis ibu ion and he
desi ed com o o he occupan s.
SIMULATION METHODOLOGY
De ini ion o he model unde s udy
The cha ac e is ics o he base model o he s udy a e
as ollows: a ypical class oom o 50m2 co esponding
o he non-uni e si y eaching cen e ype,
accommoda ing 25 s uden s wi h hei eache .
Dimensions a e 7.25 x 6.40 me es and 3.00 me es
SimBuild
2012
Fi h Na ional Con e ence o IBPSA-USA
Madison, Wisconsin
Augus 1-3, 2012
715
high, wi h he window o he le o he sea s o easie
eading wi h na u al ligh ing. The space is de ined, in
addi ion o i s no h side (wo s case o ien a ion o he
s udy o hea ing sys ems), by ho izon al and e ical
pa i ions in con ac wi h o he class ooms o simila
size and use, and he common access co ido (Fig. 1).
Figu e 1 Floo plan o he class oom unde s udy
A poin o highligh is he inco po a ion o a lap op o
each s uden .
The building was assumed o be loca ed in a C3 zone
(acco ding o Spanish clima ic zoning), which has
mode a ely cold win e s and ho summe s, as can be
seen on Table 1.
Table 1 Loca ion da a
Loca ion
G anada (Spain)
Time zone
GTM +1:00
Longi ude/La i ude
3.78º (W) / 37.18º (N)
Ele a ion abo e sea le el
559.0 m
Ex e io calcula ion empla e
1.9 ºC
Rela i e humidi y o calcula ion
90%
Wind speed
10.1 m/s
Calcula ion da e
21s o Janua y
Clima ic da e empla e
ESP_G anada.swec
The building da a on he he mal en elope comply wi h
he cu en na ional s anda d o limi ing ene gy
demand, and a e shown in Table 2.
Table 2 En elope
ELEMENT TRANSMITTANCE
(W/m
2
·K)
Façade
0.45
Ve ical pa i ions
2.09
Slab
1.98
Insula ed doo
0.84
Fenes a ion
Double glazed window (4/6/4) wi h
he mal b eak
Desc ip ion o he sys ems s udied
The s udy ocuses on he modi ica ion o he beha iou
o he class oom o e a ypical usage pe iod, by adding
a mechanical en ila ion sys em o a adia o hea ing
ins alla ion, which adi ionally elied on uncon olled
en ing h ough he en elope (model A). This o iginal
model is he mos common in Sou he n Eu ope.
The adia o hea exchange sys em, common o bo h
models, consis s o h ee s eel panels benea h he
windows o model A and wo s eel panels o model
B, ma ked ed in Figu e 2a and b, wi h an a e age
emission empe a u e o 70 ºC and a a he mal
di e ence o 20 ºC in he wa e I/O. The wa e low
a ies acco ding o he he mal equi emen s o he
enue.
Figu e 2 Posi ioning o HVAC elemen s in he models
The in il a ion a e o model 1 is ep esen ed by a
cons an alue o 1 ai change pe hou in oduced in o
he enue h ough windows pe ime e , adop ed as a
usual alue as we ha e been able o app ecia e in
di e en ield es s. The emaining ai ge s ou o he
enue h ough he doo jambs.
The mechanical en ila ion sys em in oduced in he
second model unde conside a ion (model B) as a
SimBuild
2012
Fi h Na ional Con e ence o IBPSA-USA
Madison, Wisconsin
Augus 1-3, 2012
716
complemen o esol e he indoo ai quali y, acco ding
o EN 13779 on en ila ion o non- esiden ial
buildings, consis s o a neu al p ima y ai condi ione
(dedica ed ou doo ai handle ) which il e s and hea
ea s 1170 m3/h o ou doo ai o le el IDA2 a 21 °C,
he in e io empe a u e se -poin . In addi ion, wa e
apou is in oduced by a s eam lance o each 40%
ela i e humidi y a he quo ed 21 °C.
The ai is in oduced in a ypical ashion ia he
in e io uppe pa o he class oom and collec ed in a
pe pendicula plane below ha o he supply.
The a io be ween he impulse and ex ac ion lows is
80%, in o de o achie e an o e p essu e s a e o s op
he in luence o na u al in il a ions. This emaining ai
escapes om he enue hough doo jambs and he
pe ime e o he windows depending on hei ou le
su aces.
Condi ions o use and ope a ion
The elemen s used in bo h s udy models a e shown in
Table 3.
Table 3 Elemen s included in he calcula ions
The mal con ol
21 ºC se empe a u e
Tables and chai s
26 ( able and chai pe occupan )
Ligh ing 6 o e head ligh s, indi idual emission
o 58 W (con ec i e componen only)
Ne books
One pe occupan , wi h an indi idual
low emission o 30 W (Lim, E. e al
and Lee, J.M. e al).
Occupan s
Teache , s anding, and 25 s uden s,
si ing, wi h an indi idual low
emission o 45 W (con ec i e
componen only) and clo hing 1.2 clo.
0.52 people/m
2
.
Openings
Model A: In il a ion a e o 1.0 ai
change pe hou h ough he windows
pe ime e .
Model B: In il a ion a e o 0.0 ai
changes pe hou .
Radia o s Model A: Th ee s eel adia o panels.
Model B: Two s eel adia o panels.
Mechanical
Ven ila ion
Model A: None
Model B: Neu al en ila ion ai
supply o 1170 m3/h (IDA 2).
A ea occupied Acco ding o EN 13779 on en ila ion
o non- esiden ial buildings ( ig 3).
Tool o ene gy simula ion
The so wa e chosen bo h o nodal calcula ions and
o he CFD was Design Builde 2.36.007. This
p og am was designed as he nodal simula ion engine
Ene gyPlus by he U.S. Depa men o Ene gy, and
also inco po a es a s eady-s a e ype CFD module,
alida ed by he Uni e si y o No humb ia
(Newcas le), which calcula es snap-sho o he s udied
model using nodal simula ion da a as bounda y
condi ions.
Fo his s udy, a simula ion ool wi h low
compu a ional needs bu eliable esul s was adop ed,
o allow o an easie me hodology de elopmen ,
al hough he p ocess applied is usable unde all ypes
o CFD calcula ion engines.
Figu e 3 Occupied zone in ho izon al (a) and e ical
(b) sec ion o he class oom (EN 13779)
P ope ies o calcula ion and de i ed geome ical
conside a ions
When building he s udy model in he p og am o make
he nodal calcula ion, i is necessa y o c ea e he
bounda y condi ions (Figu e 4), i.e., he spaces wi h
which he class oom makes con ac , hey a e:
• The class oom on i s le (P1)
• The class oom on i s le (P1)
• The class oom immedia ely abo e (P2)
• The class oom immedia ely below (PB)
• Access co ido (P1)
The cha ac e is ics o hese spaces will be he same as
he s udy loca ion, excep he hall, which ep esen s an
a ea wi hou ai condi ioning and ze o occupa ion and
ac i i y.
Figu e 4 Model unde s udy and adjacen enues
SimBuild
2012
Fi h Na ional Con e ence o IBPSA-USA
Madison, Wisconsin
Augus 1-3, 2012
717
The bounda ies o hese adjacen a eas, which a e he
ex e io and he o he class ooms. The la e
connec ion is ep esen ed by adiaba ic pa i ions, since
he ene gy exchange wi h hese o he ooms is no o
g ea ele ance, gi en he p edominance o ene gy
lows o he ex e io ia he en elope compa ed o
hose ha occu be ween he pa i ions.
To s udy he empo al e olu ion o bo h models, i was
chosen o pe o m an hou ly simula ion hypo hesis
a e he s a a 8:00 un il 11:00, when he daily b eak
ime occu s, hus b eaking he he mal cycle (Table 4),
ob aining he cha ac e iza ion o each o hese ins an s
o la e e alua ion.
Table 4 Desc ip ion o he adop ed assump ions
HEATING
SYSTEM
VENTILATION
SYSTEM
DIALY
EVOLUTION
3 adia o s unde
he windows
In il a ions h ough
he en elope
8:00; 9:00;
10:00; 11:00
2 adia o s unde
he windows
Mechanical
en ila ion sys em
8:00; 9:00;
10:00; 11:00
Fo CFD simula ion conside a ions, he bounda y
condi ions o each scena io we e gi en by he p e ious
nodal calcula ion, also made by he Design Builde
p og am.
A wo-equa ion (S anda d k-ε) u bulence model was
chosen because i is he mos comple e model included
in his so wa e, despi e o i assumes ully u bulen
low. A Reno malisa ion G oup (RNG) k-ε model
could sol e lamina low wi h mo e accu acy, bu he
ela i e de ia ion be ween bo h models esul s is
accep able o his ype o indoo en i onmen
(S eb ic, J. e al). Also, "Upwind" was chosen as a
disc e iza ion me hod because o i s g ea e simplici y
o calcula ion o a hypo hesis wi h ai as he sole
wo king luid, unde non-ex eme condi ions, wi hou
signi ican losses in he expec ed esul s.
When designing he mesh a hexahed al s uc u e wi h
s aigh , uni o m sides was chosen, wi h a maximum
spacing o 5 cm, being p og essi ely educed nea
su aces and objec s and uses a junc ion ole ance o 1
cm and a maximum a io be ween he edges o he
esul ing cells o 1 o 10.
This maximum spacing was educed o 2.5 cm in a es
model in o de o e alua e di e gences, and was
concluded ha his spacing dec ease did no a ec
signi ican ly o he o e all esul s bu high inc eased
compu a ional ime, as expec ed o hose g id
densi ies (S eb ic, J. e al).
The maximum numbe o i e a ions o each simula ion
was es ablished a 10,000.
Me hod o compa ison o esul s
Two di e en me hods we e used, one based on
nume ical indica o s and he o he on g aphs.
The ecommenda ions o S anda ds EN ISO 7730 and
EN ISO 11079 on E gonomics o he he mal
en i onmen , we e ollowed by using a numbe o
indica o s o he mal sensa ion and clo hing associa ed
wi h an a ay o e alua ion poin s o 3x3 wi h h ee
heigh s, co esponding o he legs (0.1 m), o so (0.6
m) and head (1.1 m) o a sea ed occupan , (Fig. 5),
wi h which he esul s o he calcula ion we e analysed
om he pe spec i e o a ypical use . O hese poin s,
nine o hem (co esponding o he se ies C, F and I)
we e close o adia o s, hus simula ing he possibili y
o an occupan pe manen ly sea ed nea hem, which is
qui e common in eaching class ooms and no
ecommended by he S anda d EN ISO-13779.
Figu e 5 A ay o e alua ion poin s o 3x3x3 in he
class oom unde s udy
These indica o s a e:
• Fange me hod
• P edic ed Mean Vo e (PMV)
• P edic ed Pe cen age o Dissa is ied
(PPD)
• Le el o local he mal discom o due o
D augh Ra e (DR).
• Le el o local he mal discom o due o
e ical ai empe a u e di e ence (PD).
• Requi ed clo hing insula ion (IREQ).
• To main ain he mal equilib ium wi h high
physiological esponse (IREQminimum)
• To main ain he mal equilib ium wi h no
physiological esponse (IREQneu al)
All hese indica o s we e applied a a heigh o 0.6
me e , co esponding o he ches o a sea ed occupan .
Pa allel o hese indica o s, a se ies o linea g aphs o
he mal a ia ions we e c ea ed in suppo , and in
SimBuild
2012
Fi h Na ional Con e ence o IBPSA-USA
Madison, Wisconsin
Augus 1-3, 2012
718
which we e gene a ed a se o slices o he iso he mal
cu es con ained in he e ical sec ion o be s udied
(Fig. 6), and chosen o being highly ep esen a i e.
Th ough he supe imposi ion o he g aphs o he
ins an s s udied o each model o he mal sys em, i
was possible o pe o m he analysis o hei e olu ion,
as well as he compa a i e s udy be ween he wo
sys ems.
Figu e 6 Lineal g aphs o he mal a ia ions on
e ical sec ion on 3.57 m
DISCUSSION AND RESULT ANALYSIS
Node calcula ions
The esul s o he s uc u al he mal demand o he
class oom (wi hou mechanical en ila ion loads) as a
unc ion o ime o 21 Janua y o bo h models, a e
shown in Table 5, whe eby he adia o s deli e a
p opo ional amoun o he mal ene gy i i is equi ed.
In model B, due o he p essu iza ion c ea ed by he
neu al empe a u e en ila ion ai supply, om 10:00
in e nal loads (occupa ion, ligh ing and compu e s) a e
enough on hei own o compensa e he mal losses
h ough he en elope whi ou a hea ing sys em suppo .
Simila ly, he a e age empe a u es o he ai and
adian aces we e measu ed o each o he ins an s o
calcula ion, and a e lis ed in Table 6.
All hese da a we e used as bounda y condi ions in he
CFD calcula ion o each o he hypo heses o he
models.
Table 5 Nodal esul s o local ime s uc u al hea ing
demand (Janua y)
TIME
STRUCTURAL HEATING DEMAND
MODEL A
W
MODEL B
W
8:00 2291 1414
9:00
1158
331
10:00
696
0
11:00 321 0
Table 6 Ai and su ace a e age empe a u es o bo h
models (Janua y)
ELEMENT m2
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE
ºC
8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00
Ou doo ai
-
1.7
2.8
4.4
7.2
Ex e nal wall
23.8
14.0
15.9
16.6
17.2
Windows
7.3
8.5
12.3
13.2
14.2
Pa i ion 1
18.1
13.6
12.8
13.1
16.5
Pa i ion 2
5.7
13.9
19.3
20.0
20.4
Doo 1 1.3 11.6 11.6 11.6 13.8
Doo 2
1.3
11.6
11.6
11.6
13.8
Pa i ion 3
21.5
13.5
16.0
16.9
17.4
Pa i ion 4 21.5 13.5 16.0 16.9 17.4
Floo
45.1
14.6
15.9
16.9
17.8
Ceiling
45.1
15.4
16.6
17.5
17.8
TOTAL 190.8 14.1 15.6 16.5 17.4
CFD calcula ions
Figu e 7 3D iew o he class oom wi h mesh o iso he m cu es. Model B.
SimBuild
2012
Fi h Na ional Con e ence o IBPSA-USA
Madison, Wisconsin
Augus 1-3, 2012
719

Figu e 8 T ans e sal e ical sec ion (X = 3,57 m) and ho izon al sec ion (Z = 1 m) o model A and B a 8:00
The esul s o CFD calcula ion can be shown as a 3D
ma ix o iso he mal lines ( ig. 7) which can be cu
wi h ho izon al and e ical sec ions o being easie
analyzed ( ig. 8).
To analyse he beha iou o he wo sys ems s udied,
he cen al ans e se e ical sec ion was aken, a e
checking by means o a ho izon al sec ion a 1 me e
and he a ay o e alua ion poin s ha he o he wo
ans e se e ical sec ions which co e he emaining
poin s beha e simila ly o he s udy objec .
To calcula e he a ious indica o s, ai empe a u e,
eloci y and ela i e humidi y da a we e aken o e
ime in he e alua ion poin s D1+2 +3, E1+2 +3 and
F1 +2 +3 o bo h models.
Applying he E gonomics o he The mal
En i onmen egula ions
Wi h he da a abo e, each o he indica o s desc ibed
(Table 7) we e calcula ed, and e alua ed acco ding o
EN ISO 7730 in h ee ca ego ies, om bes o wo s
com o : A (g een), B (o ange) and C ( ed). Whe e ou
o he ange, he alue is in black.
The inal classi ica ion o he he mal en i onmen was
equal o he leas a ou able o he ou indica o s.
F om his able we can see ha al hough bo h sys ems
e ol e in a simila way, he he mal pe cep ion o he
occupan s in he adia o s only model (model A) is
sligh ly be e .
Table 7 Expec ed com o indica o s o model A and
model B (0.6 me e s high)
POINT
PMV
-3 o 3
PPD
%
DR
%
PD
%
IREQ
min
clo
neu
clo
D 2
8:00
A
B
-0.63
-0.70
13.2
15.3
4.24
6.05
8.5
2.4
0.92
0.93
1.28
1.29
E 2
8:00
A
B
-0.67
-0.68
14.5
14.6
0.00
5.09
12.5
6.3
0.95
0.92
1.31
1.28
F 2
8:00
A
B
-0.70
-0.41
15.3
8.5
1.64
3.13
19.1
1.4
0.96
0.77
1.32
1.13
D 2
9:00
A
B
-0.51
-0.67
10.4
14.3
1.18
5.23
4.5
2.4
0.86
0.92
1.23
1.28
E 2
9:00
A
B
-0.55
-0.67
11.2
14.4
0.00
5.42
5.5
4.7
0.88
0.92
1.24
1.28
F 2
9:00
A
B
-0.57
-0.42
11.7
8.6
2.94
4.76
17.9
1.1
0.88
0.77
1.24
1.13
D 2
10:00
A
B
-0.42
-0.60
8.7
12.6
0.00
5.00
3.2
2.0
0.85
0.89
1.18
1.25
E 2
10:00
A
B
-0.45
-0.61
9.2
12.7
0.00
4.38
4.2
3.6
0.86
0.89
1.22
1.25
F 2
10:00
A
B
-0.5
-0.35
10.3
7.6
3.72
4.43
4.2
1.0
0.86
0.74
1.22
1.11
D 2
11:00
A
B
-0.34
-0.54
7.4
11.2
0.00
4.92
2.6
2.0
0.79
0.85
1.15
1.22
E 2
11:00
A
B
-0.37
-0.55
7.8
11.3
0.00
5.48
3.9
3.4
0.82
0.85
1.18
1.22
F 2
11:00
A
B
-0.40
-0.53
8.4
11.1
0.00
4.77
12.1
0.9
0.83
0.85
1.19
1.08
SimBuild
2012
Fi h Na ional Con e ence o IBPSA-USA
Madison, Wisconsin
Augus 1-3, 2012
720
This is mainly due o he di e gence in he ela i e
humidi y o he ai , which inc eased o e ime in
model A and was mo e s able in he model B due o i s
hyg o he mic ea men . This humidi y a ia ion is also
mo e sha ply pe cei ed in he inc easing di e gence
be ween he wo sys ems when assessing he le el o
insula ion o he clo hing, i becoming somewha
excessi e a 11:00 in he i s case, because o he high
humidi y. D augh a e alues a e highe in model B
han model A, due o he en ila ion sys em wo king,
bu despi e his bo h models ob ain ca ego y A in his
indica o . Finally, he PD indica o demons a es
g ea e s a i ica ion in he occupied a ea o he i s
se ies o he model.
Lineal g aph analysis o he mal a ia ions
acco ding o sec ion
The esul ing g aphs a e shown in igu e 9, acco ding
o he p e iously selec ed cu s included in igu e 5.
Figu e 9 Lineal g aphs o he mal a ia ions on e ical sec ion o model A and model B
In he g aphs i can be seen again ha he e is s ong
he mal homogenei y in he ho izon al plane, b oken
only by app oach o he adia ing elemen s. On he
o he hand, a mo e p onounced s a i ica ion
phenomenon eappea s in he model A, a ac which
a ou s a be e ene gy dis ibu ion and a g ea e
endency o app oach he 21ºC ai empe a u e being
seen in he en ila ion hypo hesis (model B).
CONCLUSION
Abou he me hodology
The p ocess o c ea ing he wo king model desc ibed,
despi e ha ing been pe o med wi h a so wa e wi h
low compu a ional equi emen s bu enough accu a e
esul s, is ully expo able o o he p og ams wi h
g ea e equi emen s and ea u es because i was
ocused on es ablishing he ini ial and bounda y
condi ions, and i is p esen ed as a me hodological
SimBuild
2012
Fi h Na ional Con e ence o IBPSA-USA
Madison, Wisconsin
Augus 1-3, 2012
721
guide o he gene a ion o any kind o model o
s udying ai -condi ioned loca ions.
Mo eo e , he dual analysis o hese calcula ion da a
by using combined indica o s o p o en eliabili y as
he Fange me hod, he indica o s o local he mal
discom o and he IREQ index, as well as he se ies o
linea g aphs o he mal a ia ions, allow objec i e and
de ailed cha ac e iza ion o he he mal beha iou
simula ed wi h CFD o he HVAC sys ems in he gi en
loca ions, in o de o compa e hem wi h al e na i e
sys ems in hese loca ions.
Abou he esul s
The adia o s only sys em, despi e allowing somewha
highe a e age ai empe a u es o be eached han in
he sys em inco po a ing mechanical en ila ion, i
su e s om a highe deg ee o s a i ica ion and
he mal he e ogenei y, while su e ing om excessi e
build-up o humidi y de i ed om occupa ion. On he
o he hand, i helps o sligh ly inc ease he mal
pe cep ion and g adually dec ease he amoun o
insula ion by clo hing.
In any case, hese di e ences a e no ma ked, because
he e ec o he in oduc ion o mechanical en ila ion
on he selec ed empe a u e o he occupied a ea does
no signi ican ly in luence he o e all he mal a ia ion
o he enclosu e, al hough i is e iden ha he e is a
need o humidi ica ion o imp o e he le el o
occupan com o .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like o hank he esea ch g oup PAIDI
TEP-130 (A chi ec u e, He i age and Sus ainabili y:
acous ics, ligh ing and ene gy) o Uni e si y o Se ille
all help and suppo p o ided.
REFERENCES
2003. ORDER which app o es he design and
cons uc ion s anda ds o educa ional buildings o
Regional Minis y o Educa ion and Science o he
Jun a de Andalucía, 23 d Janua y. O icial Gaze e o
Jun a de Andalucía. 43:4669.
Campano, M. A. e al. 2011. “Analysis o he mal
emissions om adia o s in class ooms in
Medi e anean clima es”. P ocedia Enginee ing 21:
106-113.
Fange , P.O. 1972. The mal Com o Analysis and
applica ions in en i onmen al enginee ing. Mc G aw
Hill, New Yo k.
ISO 11079:2007. E gonomics o he he mal
en i onmen . De e mina ion and in e p e a ion o cold
s ess when using equi ed clo hing insula ion (IREQ)
and local cooling e ec s. CEN.
ISO 13779:2008. Ven ila ion o non- esiden ial
buildings. Pe o mance equi emen s o en ila ion
and oom-condi ioning sys ems. CEN.
ISO 7730:2005. E gonomics o he he mal
en i onmen . Analy ical de e mina ion and
in e p e a ion o he mal com o using calcula ion o
he PMV and PPD indices and local he mal com o
c i e ia. CEN.
Ka imipanah, T. e al. 2007. “In es iga ion o ai
quali y, com o pa ame e s and e ec i eness o wo
loo -le el ai supply sys ems in class ooms”. Building
and En i onmen 42 (2): 647-655.
Lim, E. e al. 2008. “CFD analysis o Ai low
Cha ac e is ics inside O ice Room wi h Hyb id Ai -
condi ioning Sys em”. P oceedings o he 29 h AIVC
con e ence, Ai In il a ion and Ven ila ion Cen e,
Kyo o, Japan. 1: 89-94
Lee, j. M. 2009. “The mal Design o NOTEBOOK PC
by using he mal analysis”. Building and En i onmen
47 (4): 2754-2759.
Meiss, A. e al. 2011. “E ec o openings loca ion on
he en ila ion e iciency in dwellings”. In o mes de la
Cons ucción 63 (522): 53-60.
School o Buil and Na u al En i onmen o
No humb ia Uni e si y. 2011. “An In e -p og am
Analysis o Compu a ional Dynamics Based on
PHOENICS and Design Builde So wa e”. A ailable
a :
h p://www.designbuilde .co.uk/componen /op ion,com
_docman/ ask,doc_download/gid,39/I emid,30/
S eb ic, J. e al. 2008. “CFD bounda y condi ions o
con aminan dispe sion, hea ans e and ai low
simula ions a ound human occupan s in indoo
en i onmen s”. Building and En i onmen 43: 294-
303.
S amou, A. Ka si is, I. 2006. “Ve i ica ion o a CFD
model o indoo ai low and hea ans e ”. Building
and En i onmen 41 (9): 1171-1181.
Zhai, Z. J. e al. 2004. “Sensi i i y analysis and
applica ion guides o in eg a ed building ene gy and
CFD simula ion”. Ene gy and Buildings 38 (9): 1060-
1068.
SimBuild
2012
Fi h Na ional Con e ence o IBPSA-USA
Madison, Wisconsin
Augus 1-3, 2012
722