scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Monitoring resistance of Helicoverpa armigera to different insecticides used in cotton in Spain

Abstract

Helicoverpa armigera is the key pest of cotton in Spain, resulting in many insecticide treatments against it. The resistance status of H. armigera to different insecticides currently used in cotton was evaluated in Spain in two different seasons, 1999 and 2004. Four populations were tested in total, two in each season. Toxicological bioassays were conducted in the laboratory, and performed on third instar larvae by topical application of the insecticides. LD50's were estimated by probit analysis and resistance factors (RF) were calculated at the LD50 level. Four insecticides were evaluated, but only endosulfan reached a moderate resistance level (RF = 11.4), and the others (methomyl, chlorpyrifos and lambda-cyhalothrin) showed low resistance (RF between 1.9 and 6.0). Such results indicate the generally low resistance of H. armigera to most of the insecticides used against this pest in cotton in Spain. Possible explanations for this situation are discussed

Read accessible full text

Monitoring resistance of Helicoverpa armigera to different insecticides used in cotton in Spain

Author: Avilla Hernández, Carlos; González Zamora, José Enrique
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2009.09.007
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/17cda190-f262-4778-9bc3-fbab04bf6bf6/download
1
Ti le:
1
Moni o ing esis ance o
Helico e pa a mige a
o di e en insec icides used in co on
2
in Spain.
3
4
Au ho s: Ca los A illa, José E. González-Zamo a
5
6
A ilia ions: Depa men o Ciencias Ag o o es ales, Uni e si y o Se ille. Ca e e a
7
de U e a, km 1. E-41012-Se ille (Spain)
8
9
Co esponding au ho : José E. González-Zamo a
10
zamo [email protected]
11
Phone: +34-954 486 459
12
Fax: +34-954 46 436
13
Published in: C op P o ec ion 29 (2010) 100–103
14
doi:10.1016/j.c op o.2009.09.007
15
2
Abs ac
1
Helico e pa a mige a
is he key pes o co on in Spain, esul ing in many
2
insec icide ea men s agains i . The esis ance s a us o
Helico e pa a mige a
o
3
di e en insec icides cu en ly used in co on was e alua ed in Spain in wo di e en
4
seasons, 1999 and 2004. Fou popula ions we e es ed in o al, wo in each season.
5
Toxicological bioassays we e conduc ed in he labo a o y, and pe o med on hi d
6
ins a la ae by opical applica ion o he insec icides. LD50’s we e es ima ed by
7
p obi analysis and esis ance ac o s (RF) we e calcula ed a he LD50 le el. Fou
8
insec icides we e e alua ed, bu only endosul an eached a mode a e esis ance le el
9
(RF=11.4), and he o he s (me homyl, chlo py i os and lambda-cyhalo h in) showed
10
low esis ance (RF be ween 1.9 and 6.0). Such esul s indica e he gene ally low
11
esis ance o
H. a mige a
o mos o he insec icides used agains his pes in co on
12
in Spain. Possible explana ions o his si ua ion a e discussed.
13
14
Key wo ds: insec icide esis ance, co on,
Helico e pa a mige a
, endosul an,
15
me homyl, chlo py i os, lambda-cyhalo h in.
16
3
1. In oduc ion
1
Co on is an impo an c op in he Guadalqui i i e alley (Andalucía, sou he n
2
Spain), especially in he p o inces o Se ille, Có doba and Cádiz. One o i s main
3
economic cos s comes om insec icide ea men s agains pes s like
Helico e pa
4
a mige a
Hübne (Lepidop e a: Noc uidae), he key pes o co on in sou he n Spain
5
(Du án, 1999).
H. a mige a
can se e ely educe co on yields, mainly because i
6
eeds on lowe buds, lowe s and on he boll. I s con ol is based mainly on an IPM
7
schedule, which in ol es es ima ing popula ions o he pes and i s na u al enemies:
8
p edado y bugs (He e op e a) and lacewings (Neu op e a), and ecommending
9
insec icides only when
H. a mige a
popula ions su pass a h eshold and na u al
10
enemies a e sca ce (Du án, 1999; 2003).
11
12
The con ol o his pes in Spanish co on may equi e se e al applica ions
13
h ough he season ( he IPM co on is sp ayed wi h insec icides be ween 2 and 9
14
imes, ange ob ained om 23 seasons, Du án (1999; 2003)), mainly o endosul an
15
and me homyl (2-6 ea men s), complemen ed wi h o he p oduc s including
16
py e h oids (e.g. lambda-cyhalo h in), o ganophospha es (e.g. chlo py i os) o o he
17
ca bama es (e.g. hiodica b) (Du án, 2003). The con inuous use o hese p oduc s
18
can lead o he de elopmen o esis an popula ions o
H. a mige a
, and in he 2003
19
season impo an con ol ailu es o
H. a mige a
we e obse ed in co on ields. The
20
ailu e epo s in ol ed mainly he Se ille p o ince and he wo p oduc s ha we e
21
mos used agains his ca e pilla , endosul an and me homyl. The e a e many epo s
22
o he esis ance o
H. a mige a
(and o he Helio hinae) o insec icides a ound he
23
wo ld, especially o py e h oids, bu also o o he g oups o insec icides, like
24
4
cyclodienes (such as endosul an), ca bama es (such as me homyl and hiodica b)
1
and o ganophospha es (such as clo py iphos) (McCa e y, 1999; Bues e al., 2005;
2
Ahmad e al., 2007; Pie an onio e al., 2007; Ugu lu and Gu kan, 2007; Saleem e
3
al., 2008).
4
5
Co on is a good c op in which o s udy he p esence o esis ance o insec icides
6
due o he high numbe o ea men s ha may be applied (Deguine e al., 2008),
7
bu un il now no speci ic s udy has been done in his c op in Spain, e en hough,
8
wi h G eece and Bulga ia, i is one o he ew coun ies in he Eu opean Union whe e
9
co on is cul i a ed. On he o he hand, ou s udy complemen s o he s ca ied ou in
10
Spain o analyze he s a us o esis ance in
H. a mige a
in di e en c ops (To es-Vila
11
e al., 2002a,b). This s udy co e ed wo seasons: he 1999 season, in which he
12
baseline esis ance o he insec icides ha a e mos equen ly used agains
H.
13
a mige a
in co on was es ablished wi h a labo a o y s ain, and compa ed wi h a
14
ield popula ion, and he 2004 season, in which he e olu ion o suscep ibili y o he
15
same insec icides o e he pe iod o 5 yea s, and con ol ailu es o
H. a mige a
in
16
co on epo ed in he p e ious 2003 season, we e analysed.
17
18
2. Ma e ial and me hods
19
The
H. a mige a
popula ions used in his s udy we e ob ained om co on ields
20
in Se ille and Có doba (Andalucía, sou he n Spain) om la ae collec ed in di e en
21
plo s. In 1999, he labo a o y s ain was c ea ed om a numbe o pupae om a
22
colony ha had been main ained in he Uni e si y o Có doba by P o esso E. Va gas-
23
Osuna since 1996, wi h pe iodical ein oduc ions o indi iduals om co on ields,
24
5
and wi h no con ac wi h any kind o insec icide. The 1999 ield s ain was ob ained
1
in June by collec ing la ae om di e en co on ields om he p o ince o Se ille.
2
In he 2004 season, wo popula ions we e collec ed, he i s in June (p io o
3
applica ion o insec icides agains
H. a mige a
in ha season) om la ae om
4
di e en co on ields in he p o ince o Se ille in which con ol ailu es o
H.
5
a mige a
had been obse ed in he p e ious 2003 season, and he o he in
6
Sep embe , om he same o nea by co on plo s.
7
8
La ae we e b ough o he labo a o y and ea ed ollowing he me hodology o
9
Poi ou and Bues (1974), a 26±1 ºC and 55±10 %RH wi h a 16:8(L:D) pho ope iod.
10
Adul s we e ea ed in e ical cylind ical ubes o 11 cm in diame e and 26 cm in
11
heigh , cons uc ed om labo a o y d ying pape and co e ed wi h pape . Th ee o
12
i e pai s o adul s we e placed in each ube o ma ing and o iposi ion in he
13
condi ions desc ibed abo e, and we e ed wi h a 10% honey solu ion. Eggs we e
14
collec ed in co on bundles and placed in con aine s. A e ha ching, la ae we e ed
15
wi h a semi-syn he ic die (Poi ou and Bues, 1974) and ea ed in he condi ions
16
desc ibed abo e. Thi d ins a la ae we e ans e ed o indi idual cages o 4 cm in
17
diame e and 2 cm in heigh , wi h a po ion o die , o insec icide bioassays.
18
19
Labo a o y es ing o he insec icides was ca ied ou wi h he i s o second
20
gene a ion o la ae ea ed in he labo a o y. Toxicological bioassays we e pe o med
21
on hi d ins a la ae using he s anda d opical applica ion p ocedu e as
22
ecommended by he En omological Socie y o Ame ica (Anonymous, 1970) and
23
ollowing he guidelines o Robe son and P eisle (1992). Fou p oduc s we e used:
24

6
endosul an (Thiodan-35, 350 g l-1 a.i. om Baye C opScience), me homyl (Bonsul,
1
200 g l-1 a.i. om Baye C opScience), chlo py i os (Cuspide-48, 480 g l-1 a.i. om
2
Come cial Química Massó), and lambda-cyhalo h in (Ka a e King, 25 g l-1 a.i. om
3
Syngen a). Fo each insec icide, se ial dilu ions in ace one [o 0.075% humec an
4
(Ag idexa, om Baye C opScience) in wa e o lambda-cyhalo h in] we e p epa ed
5
so ha each was one-hal o he p e ious dose. A d op o solu ion (2 µl) was applied
6
wi h a 0.5–10 µl mic opipe e o he ho acic do sum o each hi d ins a la ae.
7
Con ols o each eplica e we e ea ed wi h ace one (o wa e wi h Ag idexa) alone.
8
The cages we e closed wi h a lid en ila ed by a hole co e ed wi h mesh, and le in
9
he same ea ing condi ions desc ibed abo e. Fo each s ain, a leas 240 la ae
10
we e ea ed pe insec icide, usually wi h 4 eplica es o 10 la ae a each o 5 o
11
mo e insec icide concen a ions. A e 48 hou s mo ali y was assessed: la ae we e
12
conside ed dead i hey we e desicca ed, o unable o mo e when dis u bed wi h a
13
b ush.
14
15
Dose-mo ali y eg essions, LD50’s and hei iducial limi s we e es ima ed by
16
p obi analysis (Finney, 1971) using he POLO Plus 1.0 so wa e (LeO a So wa e,
17
Be keley, CA, USA). Resis ance ac o s (RF) we e es ima ed a he LD50 le el as RF=
18
LD50 collec ed s ain/ LD50 e e ence s ain (ei he he 1999 labo a o y s ain o he
19
s ains collec ed in he ield in 1999 o June 2004). The insec icide esis ance le el
20
was classi ied acco ding o he c i e ia epo ed in To es-Vila e al. (2002a,b):
21
suscep ibili y (RF=1), low esis ance (RF=2–10), mode a e esis ance (RF=11–30),
22
high esis ance (RF=31–100), and e y high esis ance (RF=>100).
23
24
7
3. Resul s and Discussion
1
The esis ance in
Helico e pa a mige a
o di e en insec icides ha a e usually
2
applied in Spain on co on was es ed in wo seasons (Table 1). In all cases, he
-
3
a io o he slope was signi ican (P<0.05), so ha a signi ican dose- esponse line
4
was ob ained.
5
6
Bo h in e -season and in a-season compa isons can be made wi h he da a. In
7
he in e -season compa ison, he esul s showed ha he LD50 o all p oduc s es ed
8
had inc eased a he end o he 2004 season (in Sep embe ), when compa ed
9
agains he LD50 o he 1999 labo a o y s ain, wi h he iducial limi s no
10
o e lapping, excep in chlo py i os. This inc emen was mos ob ious wi h
11
endosul an, which eached he ca ego y o mode a e esis ance (RF=11.4), whe eas
12
he o he p oduc s we e placed in he ca ego y o low esis ance (RF ange be ween
13
1.9 and 6.0). Compa ison o he da a om Sep embe 2004 wi h he ield popula ion
14
o 1999 p oduced RFs ha anged om 1.1 o 3.1, i.e., om suscep ibili y o low
15
esis ance, bu only endosul an had iducial limi s ha did no o e lap, indica ing an
16
inc emen in i s LD50 in his pe iod.
17
18
The second kind o compa ison is in a-season. The only compa ison ha is
19
meaning ul is o he yea 2004, when ield popula ions we e collec ed a he
20
beginning and a he end o he season. The Sep embe popula ion showed
21
suscep ibili y/low esis ance (RF be ween 0.6 and 1.7) when compa ed wi h he June
22
popula ion, bu no inc emen o he LD50 was de ec ed, wi h he iducial limi s
23
o e lapping o all he insec icides.
24
8
1
The esul s ob ained in his wo k a e simila o hose ob ained in a s udy by
2
To es-Vila e al. (2002a,b) du ing 1995 o 1999, which included he same
3
insec icides es ed he e, bu in di e en c ops (excluding co on). They ound he
4
LD50 o endosul an o be be ween 0.93 and 6.70 µg/la a, which includes ou esul .
5
In e ms o he RF, he alue ob ained in his s udy was highe (RF=11.4, included in
6
he mode a e esis ance ca ego y), bu his is p obably because i was compa ed
7
wi h a mo e suscep ible labo a o y s ain. I he less suscep ible s ain o To es-Vila
8
e al. (2002a) had been used ins ead, hen he RF would be 3 (included in he low
9
esis ance ca ego y).
10
11
The o he insec icides es ed in his s udy (i.e., me homyl, chlo py i os and
12
lambda-cyhalo h in) ollowed he same pa e n as endosul an: hei LD50 is included
13
in he ange o alues epo ed in To es-Vila e al. (2002a,b), and wi h RF alues
14
ha a e always wi hin he suscep ibili y o low esis ance ca ego y.
15
16
A clea inc emen o he LD50 has been de ec ed in mos o he insec icides es ed
17
be ween 1999 and 2004, compa ed wi h he labo a o y s ain. Only a small change
18
was obse ed in he LD50 in he pe iod om 1999 o 2004 in he ield s ains (only
19
signi ica i e in he case o endosul an), and no signi ican inc emen was de ec ed in
20
he 2004 season. O e all, ou esul s showed li le o no di e ence om he esul s
21
ob ained in he gene al s udy ca ied ou om 1995 o 1999 by To es-Vila e al.
22
(2002a,b) in Spain, e en hough he s udy p esen ed he e included wo seasons,
23
1999 and 2004, ha we e e y sepa a e in ime. Such esul s indica e a gene al
24
9
scena io o low esis ance o
H. a mige a
o almos all he p oduc s es ed in Spain,
1
excep o some py e h oids (cype me h in, lambda-cyhalo h in and del ame h in),
2
o which To es-Vila e al. (2002b) ound high o e y high le els o esis ance,
3
al hough only in 4 ou o 111 insec icide–s ain combina ions es ed, in ol ing 2 ou
4
o 35
H. a mige a
s ains.
5
6
The le el o esis ance in
H. a mige a
o endosul an in ou s udy can be
7
conside ed as low o mode a e. This is simila o he si ua ion in o he co on-
8
g owing egions such as hose in Tu key (Ugu lu and Gu kan, 2007) and India
9
(K an hi e al., 2002; Su yawanshi e al., 2008). In e ms o o he insec icides, like
10
me homyl, se e al o ganophospha es, and especially py e h oids (such as
11
cype me h in, del ame h in, lambda-cyhalo h in, and o he s), he e a e many s udies
12
om di e en coun ies epo ing high le els o esis ance in his species (K an hi e
13
al., 2002; Pie an onio e al., 2007; Ugu lu and Gu kan, 2007; Su yawanshi e al.,
14
2008). S udies o insec icide esis ance in
Helico e pa/Helio his
in Eu ope ha e no
15
been limi ed o Spain, and in F ance he e is also e idence o signi ican le els o
16
esis ance o py e h oids (del ame h in), and mode a e esis ance o me homyl in
H.
17
a mige a
, bu no esis ance has been de ec ed agains endosul an
(Bues e al.,
18
2005).
19
20
The de elopmen o insec icide esis ance is p ima ily he esul o he selec ion
21
p essu e exe ed on sp ayed popula ions, which inc eases he equency o esis an
22
indi iduals. Howe e , he co on c op in Spain is sp ayed wi h insec icides agains
H.
23
a mige a
om 2 o 6 imes pe season (Du án, 2003), which does no help o explain
24
16
Table 1. Toxici y o opically applied insec icides, cu en ly used in co on in
1
Spain, o di e en s ains o
Helico e pa a mige a
la ae (F1 and F2, hi d ins a ), in
2
wo yea s.
3
Insec icide
Yea –S ain
In e cep
Slope±S.E.
LD50
(µg/la a)
95%
iducial
limi s
RFa
Endosul an
1999–Labo a o y
6.31
2.19±0.34
0.25
0.18–0.32
--
1999–Field
5.05
1.81±0.26
0.93
0.72–1.28
3.7
2004–June
4.54
2.11±0.27
1.64
1.30–2.05
6.6
2004–Sep embe
4.10
1.97±0.33
2.86
1.44–5.03
11.4
Me homyl
1999–Labo a o y
6.57
1.43±0.28
0.08
0.05–0.12
--
1999–Field
6.14
1.92±0.27
0.26
0.19–0.33
3.3
2004–June
5.46
1.01±0.16
0.35
0.22–0.50
4.4
2004–Sep embe
5.47
1.48±0.22
0.48
0.19–0.90
6.0
Chlo py i os
1999–Labo a o y
7.83
3.06±0.40
0.12
0.09–0.14
--
1999–Field
7.16
3.21±0.46
0.21
0.17–0.25
1.8
2004–June
5.88
2.21±0.28
0.40
0.32–0.50
3.3
2004–Sep embe
6.41
2.22±0.20
0.23
0.11–0.41
1.9
Lambda-Cyhalo h in
1999–Labo a o y
7.88
1.63±0.28
0.02
0.00–0.03
--
1999–Field
7.12
1.40±0.25
0.03
0.02–0.04
1.5
2004–June
6.87
1.64±0.19
0.07
0.06–0.09
3.5
2004–Sep embe
7.08
1.85±0.27
0.08
0.05–0.12
4.0
In all s ain–insec icide combina ions he p obi dose- esponse lines we e signi ican (
- a io
4
es ,
P
<0.05).
5
a Resis ance ac o (RF) es ima ed as RF= LD50 speci ic s ain/LD50 1999 labo a o y s ain.
6
7