scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Disclosing the Tacit Links between Risk and Success in Organizational Development Project Portfolios

Abstract

Project portfolios aim to impact organizational strategic goals, influencing both the organization’s business model and its processes. Nonetheless, the actual impact is dependent on the portfolio’s success, which is affected by the materialization of risk factors. This study aims to examine the tacit conceptualization of project portfolio risk as a risk measure explicitly based on project portfolio success itself. In order to focus on the portfolios of organizational development projects, Social Representation Theory was adopted to analyze empirical evidence from twenty-eight semi-structured interviews conducted with project portfolio practitioners. Findings showed that strategic fit, future preparedness, and stakeholder satisfaction were dimensions of success within which project portfolio risk could be conceptualized. Additionally, results evidenced that risk factors influenced project portfolio success through systematic and non-systematic impacts on project portfolio outputs, and also had direct impacts on project portfolio outcomes. This paper provides empirical evidence to back up the conceptualization of project portfolio risk explicitly oriented to portfolio success as a multidimensional risk measure. It represents a new avenue for conducting portfolio risk analysis for both practitioners and academics, orienting the decision-making process based on the portfolio success rather than only on the success of each project.

Read accessible full text

Disclosing the Tacit Links between Risk and Success in Organizational Development Project Portfolios

Author: Micán, Camilo,Fernandes, Gabriela,Araújo, Madalena
Year: 2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14095235
Source: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/100504/1/Disclosing-the-Tacit-Links-between-Risk-and-Success-in-Organizational-Development-Project-PortfoliosSustainability-Switzerland.pdf
Ci a ion: Micán, C.; Fe nandes, G.;
A aújo, M. Disclosing he Taci Links
be ween Risk and Success in
O ganiza ional De elopmen P ojec
Po olios. Sus ainabili y 2022,14,
5235. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/
su14095235
Academic Edi o : Michele G imaldi
Recei ed: 25 Ma ch 2022
Accep ed: 21 Ap il 2022
Published: 26 Ap il 2022
Publishe ’s No e: MDPI s ays neu al
wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in
published maps and ins i u ional a il-
ia ions.
Copy igh : © 2022 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
sus ainabili y
A icle
Disclosing he Taci Links be ween Risk and Success in
O ganiza ional De elopmen P ojec Po olios
Camilo Micán1,* , Gab iela Fe nandes 2and Madalena A aújo 3
1School o Indus ial Enginee ing, Uni e sidad del Valle, Cali 760034, Colombia
2CEMMPRE, Depa men o Mechanical Enginee ing, Uni e si y o Coimb a, 3030-788 Coimb a, Po ugal;
[email p o ec ed]
3ALGORITMI, Depa men o P oduc ion and Sys ems, Uni e si y o Minho, 4800-058 Guima ães, Po ugal;
[email p o ec ed]
*Co espondence: camilo.mican@co eouni alle.edu.co
Abs ac :
P ojec po olios aim o impac o ganiza ional s a egic goals, in luencing bo h he o ga-
niza ion’s business model and i s p ocesses. None heless, he ac ual impac is dependen on he
po olio’s success, which is a ec ed by he ma e ializa ion o isk ac o s. This s udy aims o examine
he aci concep ualiza ion o p ojec po olio isk as a isk measu e explici ly based on p ojec po -
olio success i sel . In o de o ocus on he po olios o o ganiza ional de elopmen p ojec s, Social
Rep esen a ion Theo y was adop ed o analyze empi ical e idence om wen y-eigh semi-s uc u ed
in e iews conduc ed wi h p ojec po olio p ac i ione s. Findings showed ha s a egic i , u u e
p epa edness, and s akeholde sa is ac ion we e dimensions o success wi hin which p ojec po olio
isk could be concep ualized. Addi ionally, esul s e idenced ha isk ac o s in luenced p ojec
po olio success h ough sys ema ic and non-sys ema ic impac s on p ojec po olio ou pu s, and
also had di ec impac s on p ojec po olio ou comes. This pape p o ides empi ical e idence o
back up he concep ualiza ion o p ojec po olio isk explici ly o ien ed o po olio success as a
mul idimensional isk measu e. I ep esen s a new a enue o conduc ing po olio isk analysis
o bo h p ac i ione s and academics, o ien ing he decision-making p ocess based on he po olio
success a he han only on he success o each p ojec .
Keywo ds:
p ojec po olio isk; isk managemen ; p ojec po olio success; po olio managemen ;
isk ac o s; o ganiza ional de elopmen po olios
1. In oduc ion
Inc easing global compe i ion and g owing a en ion o en i onmen al and social
issues ha e led o ganiza ions o ecognize ha o be economically, ope a ionally, and
s a egically sus ainable, hei business models and p ocesses mus be aligned wi h hese
compe i i e, en i onmen al, and social changes [
1
,
2
]. In his ega d, p ojec s ep esen a
common and sui able way o d i e changes in o ganiza ions [1].
These o ganiza ional changes mus i in o a coo dina ed c oss-p ojec s uc u e ha
enables he o ganiza ion o be compe i i e in he u u e while enhancing sho - e m pe -
o mance and leading o long- e m sus ainabili y [
2
,
3
]. P ojec po olios aim o achie e
desi ed mid- o long- e m o ganiza ional ou comes ha impac business models and he
p ocesses o companies [2,4].
A p ojec po olio ep esen s a se o p ojec s and p og ams o ien ed owa ds achie -
ing speci ic o ganiza ional objec i es [
2
,
5
]. Po olio managemen has been associa ed
wi h he ope a ionaliza ion o o ganiza ional s a egy [
6
], while seeking o add ess and
in eg a e di e en s akeholde s a he o ganiza ional le el [
7
]. Thus, an app op ia e p ojec
po olio model can p o ide an oppo uni y o g ow sus ainably, imp o e s a egic business
pe o mance, and achie e a sus ainable compe i i e posi ion in esponse o he changing
en i onmen in which o ganiza ions a e imme sed [
2
,
8
]. Howe e , he po olio’s esul s
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/su14095235 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/sus ainabili y
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 2 o 19
may no sa is y expec a ions due o he ma e ializa ion o ‘ isk ac o s’ [
5
,
9
]. In line wi h he
abo e, he concep o sus ainabili y has isk managemen as one o i s ecognized impac
a eas [9].
Risk is ela ed o decision-making p ocesses speci ic o each o ganiza ion, being
connec ed o all o ganiza ional le els [
10
]. Fo ins ance, wi hin p ojec -based o ganiza ions,
Zhao e al. [
11
] pu o wa d ha he e a e isk ac o s a di e en le els, a he han jus a
he p ojec le el, which can a ec bo h p ojec s and o he o ganiza ional le els. The isk
managemen pa adigm in p ojec con ex s has e ol ed owa d a global iew ha goes
beyond a p ojec -ci cumsc ibed pe spec i e [9,11].
In his ega d, he exis ence o speci ic po olio-le el ‘ isk ac o s’ [
5
,
9
,
12
] has been
ecognized; o ins ance, Bai e al. [
12
] iden i ied 20 isks o e he p ojec po olio li e cycle,
e ealing ha six o hem can be conside ed c i ical po olio isks. I has been addi ionally
iden i ied ha a isk app oach a he p ojec po olio le el could allow highe e ec i eness,
leading o posi i e impac s on he ‘p ojec po olio success’ [
13
]. This could also help ocus
on he mos ele an isks o he p ojec po olio and, in u n, achie e he expec ed impac
on he o ganiza ional s a egy [5,14].
The cons uc ‘p ojec po olio isk’ could be aci ly concep ualized as a measu e o
impac on ‘p ojec po olio success’ due o changes in ‘ isk ac o s’ de i ed om di e en
le els. This is aligned wi h he ac ha he isk cons uc may be associa ed wi h he
exposu e concep , which indica es he amoun o measu e o impac on expec ed esul s o
he ola ili y o a iabili y in esul s due o changes in isk ac o s [15,16].
Howe e , an app oach based on he men ioned aci concep ualiza ion o ‘p ojec
po olio isk’ is s ill ba ely s udied. By con as , inancial success measu es ha e been used
o conduc he isk assessmen o o ganiza ional in es men s in p ojec po olios
[17–19]
wi hin a gene al managemen app oach [
20
]; and p ojec success measu es, such as ime o
cos o each p ojec wi hin he po olio, ha e been inco po a ed in o isk assessmen s
o p ojec s conside ing he in e dependencies ha de i e om he po olio en i on-
men [21–23], which ollows a p ojec success iew.
The e o e, om his backg ound, he ollowing esea ch ques ion was posed: How
could ‘p ojec po olio isk’ be concep ualized as a measu e o impac on ‘p ojec po olio
success’ due o changes in ‘ isk ac o s’?
Recognizing he di e si y o con ex s, a ibu es, and pa icula i ies among di e en
ypes o p ojec po olios, his s udy ocused on he po olios o o ganiza ional de elop-
men p ojec s. This ype o p ojec po olio emb aces a mixed se o p ojec s di ec ly ela ed
o he i m’s s a egy o co po a e-le el goals and o ganiza ional s a egic impac s [
24
,
25
].
I aims o achie e a mid- o long- e m o ganiza ional ou come and, consequen ly, posi-
i ely impac business models and p ocesses [
2
]. To ha end, o ganiza ional de elopmen
po olios a e s uc u es ha espond o eme ging changes in he ex e nal and in e nal
en i onmen . The e o e, his ype o p ojec po olio conside s he s a e o he company
i sel , including he compe i i e en i onmen , ma ke ing p io i ies, changing consume
demands, equi emen s o p oduc ion echnologies, e c. [25,26].
This s udy akes he epis emological s ance o a cons uc i ism- ounded scien i ic
pa adigm o o ganizing he esea ch [
27
]. Twen y-eigh semi-s uc u ed in e iews we e
conduc ed and analyzed o cap u e he p ac i ione s’ pe spec i es on ‘ isk ac o s’ and
‘p ojec po olio success’ amed wi hin he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ cons uc . Fo ha
eason, Social Rep esen a ion Theo y (SRT) was adop ed as he heo e ical lens.
The emainde o he pape is o ganized as ollows. Fi s ly, a backg ound on ‘p ojec
po olio isk’, ‘ isk ac o s’, ‘p ojec po olio success’, and SRT is p esen ed. Then, he
adop ed esea ch me hodology is desc ibed. This is ollowed by he indings de i ed om
he in e iews, discussion o he main indings ha eme ged om he s udy, conclusions,
limi a ions, and u u e wo k ecommenda ions.
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 3 o 19
2. Li e a u e Re iew
2.1. Risk in P ojec Po olios
The concep ualiza ion o isk de i ed om Mode n Po olio Theo y, de eloped by
Ha y Ma kowi z in 1952, is p esen ed as he seminal heo y inso a as p ojec po olio isk
is a conce n [
28
]. Mode n Po olio Theo y has been used o es ablish a pa allel be ween
inancial po olios and p ojec po olios, speci ically ocusing on isk inco po a ion in o
he p ojec po olio selec ion p ocess [
17
,
19
], hus adop ing a gene al isk managemen
app oach [
20
]. These s udies a e ocused on he isk associa ed wi h inancial esul s,
gene ally de ining he isk as a unidimensional measu e. In his ega d, he isk is associa ed
wi h a ia ions in he po olio’s inancial esul s due o he a ia ion de i ed om each
p ojec and, by conside ing he co ela ion be ween each pai o p ojec s. In o he wo ds,
o al po olio isk can be conside ed o be composed o independen p ojec isk and
in e dependen p ojec isk [19].
When looking o isk app oaches o ien ed mo e owa ds p ojec po olio cha ac e is-
ics han gene al managemen , i has been posed ha po olio alue canno be measu ed
only in mone a y e ms [
13
,
29
,
30
]. Fo ins ance, p oposals o ien ed o in eg a e bo h mone-
a y and non-mone a y ac o s ha e been made [
30
]. To his end, a disc e e compa ison
o al e na i es has been explo ed [
1
,
30
], whe e a ibu es associa ed wi h he isk o each
p ojec a e conside ed as c i e ia in he po olio selec ion p ocess. O he p oposals ha e
ocused on es ima ing he isk as changes in he scope, ime, o cos o p ojec s due o some
isk ac o in e dependency and p ojec in e dependency, o as changes in he cumula i e
cos o he p ojec s wi hin he po olio [
20
,
22
,
23
,
31
]. Hence, a pe spec i e on isk in which
he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ is associa ed wi h he success o he p ojec s wi hin he po olio
is p oposed he e.
Fo his eason, hese p oposals ha e been de eloped unde a p ojec managemen
app oach [
20
], ecognizing, in mos cases, he mul idimensional na u e o p ojec success
in a way ha aci ly conside s he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ as a measu e o impac on he
success o he p ojec s wi hin he po olio due o p ojec in e dependency and changes
in p ojec ‘ isk ac o s’ du ing he p ojec po olio execu ion. Fo ins ance, conside ing
in e dependencies be ween p ojec s, se e al s udies ha e ocused on how he isk is p opa-
ga ed ac oss he p ojec s wi hin he po olio [
22
,
23
]. Howe e , po olio-le el ‘ isk ac o s’
and he condi ion ha he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ goes beyond he sum o he indi idual
isk o each p ojec wi hin he po olio, al hough highligh ed, ha e no been explici ly
inco po a ed in o isk concep ualiza ion unde his app oach.
Ho man e al. [
5
], Ghasemi e al. [
9
], and Bai e al. [
12
] p esen he iden i ica ion
and ca ego iza ion o p ojec -po olio le el ‘ isk ac o s’ om a ull spec um o p ojec
po olios. In addi ion, Ghasemi e al. [
9
] pose a isk assessmen model o ien ed owa ds
es ablishing he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ as he impac on he ‘p ojec po olio success’ as
a unidimensional measu e due o changes in p ojec - and po olio-le el ‘ isk ac o s’.
Thus, ex ending he ac ha p ojec po olios ep esen he b idge be ween p ojec s and
o ganiza ional s a egy, an al e na i e app oach o ‘p ojec po olio isk’ eme ges which
would allow o inco po a ing he speci ic po olio le el in o he analysis, i.e., po olio-
le el ‘ isk ac o s’ and ‘p ojec po olio success’ as he expec ed po olio measu es ha a e
impac ed by he ‘ isk ac o s’.
The adop ion o his al e na i e app oach o ien ed explici ly owa ds he po olio
le el could help disclose he aci ole o he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ as he b idge be ween
he p ojec -managemen - and gene al-managemen -based isk app oaches iden i ied in he
li e a u e.
2.2. Risk Fac o s in P ojec Po olios
Risk ca ego iza ion con ibu es o he e ec i eness and quali y o isk analysis, as well
as leading o a isk-based decision p ocess [
4
,
5
]. Hence, di e en ca ego iza ion schemes
o ‘ isk ac o s’ associa ed wi h p ojec s wi hin a p ojec po olio ha e been iden i ied
in he li e a u e. These ca ego iza ion schemes ha e mainly aimed a classi ying ‘ isk
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 4 o 19
ac o s’ by hei sou ces. Al e na i e ca ego iza ion schemes ha e ecen ly been posed, o
ins ance, he iden i ica ion and ca ego iza ion o c i ical isks o p ojec po olios o e he
li e cycle [12].
Acco ding o he s uc u ed li e a u e e iew conduc ed by Micán e al. [
21
], isk
ac o ca ego ies based on isk ac o sou ces could be syn hesized in o ou ca ego ies:
(1) he P ojec Po olio Managemen (PPM) le el, conside ing aspec s ela ed o po olio
in o ma ion managemen , con lic s a he po olio le el, and lack o po olio managemen
capabili ies; (2) P ojec in e ac ions, conside ing he esou ce in e dependency be ween
p ojec s as ‘ isk ac o s’ and he dependency o ou pu s be ween p ojec s; (3) Ex e nal
condi ions, in which a e g ouped ‘ isk ac o s’ de i ed om ex e nal condi ions o he
pa en o ganiza ion; and (4) O ganiza ional condi ions, conside ing aspec s ela ed ha
o ganiza ional decisions o p ocesses, including p ojec managemen p ocess and decisions
ela ed o he s uc u e o he po olio, which can in luence he p ojec po olio esul s.
Al e na i ely, he concep ualiza ion o sys ema ic and non-sys ema ic isks de i ed
om Mode n Po olio Theo y (MPT) has been adop ed o concep ualize he ‘p ojec
po olio isk’ sou ces [
32
,
33
]. This means ha , o classi y he ‘ isk ac o s’ by he ex en o
hei impac , he non-sys ema ic isk is associa ed wi h indi idual isk con ibu ions om
each p ojec isk ac o , and sys ema ic isk is de i ed om hose ‘ isk ac o s’ which ha e
an impac on he whole p ojec po olio [17].
Howe e , he ep esen a ion o sys ema ic isk has di e en in e p e a ions; o ex-
ample, Cos a e al. [
32
] pose i as being exclusi ely associa ed wi h en i onmen al ac o s,
while D ake and By d [
33
] men ion ha , besides he ac o s o he en i onmen , i includes
he isk de i ed om he in e dependency o ‘ isk ac o s’ and p ojec in e ac ions as isk
ac o sou ces. In addi ion, al hough he concep ualiza ion o sys emic and non-sys emic
isk o p ojec po olios has been widely adop ed o inco po a ing isk in o he p ojec
po olio selec ion p ocess [
17
], i is sca cely conside ed o isk analysis in he p ojec
po olio execu ion phase.
2.3. P ojec Po olio Success
Fi e ‘p ojec po olio success’ dimensions a e gene ally desc ibed in he li e a u e
[34,35]
:
(i) s a egic i , (ii) u u e p epa edness, (iii) a e age p ojec success, (i ) syne gy exploi a-
ion, and ( ) po olio balance, whe e success dimensions i, iii, i and a e based on he
PPM goals de ined by Coope e al. [
36
] o po olios o p oduc de elopmen p ojec s,
which la e we e adop ed o o he ypes o p ojec po olios. Table 1summa izes hese
i e ‘p ojec po olio success’ dimensions.
In addi ion, he dimension ela ed o economic success was inco po a ed in some
wo ks as a ‘p ojec po olio success’ dimension [
34
,
35
], while o he publica ions ega d
his dimension as a business success dimension, and he e o e a posi i e consequence o
‘p ojec po olio success’ mo e han a ‘p ojec po olio success’ dimension i sel [37].
Table 1. P ojec po olio success dimensions.
Success
Dimension Desc ip ion
S a egic i The deg ee o which he p ojec po olio e lec s he company’s s a egy,
bea ing in mind aspec s such as s uc u e, echnology, o en i onmen [
34
,
37
].
Fu u e
p epa edness
Long- e m bene i s and oppo uni ies o e ed by he p ojec po olio. This
dimension is based on he c ea ion o new ma ke s, new o imp o ed
echnologies, capabili ies o p ocesses, posi i e impac s on b and alue o
employe epu a ion, and he abili y o adap and eac o echnological o
ma ke changes [34].
A e age
p ojec success
Associa ed wi h wo main aspec s: (1) he p ojec ion o pe o mance measu es,
measu ed using c i e ia such as budge , schedule, quali y, and cus ome
sa is ac ion; (2) he ma ke and comme cial pe o mance o each p ojec ,
measu ed using inancial pe o mance c i e ia [34,35].
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 5 o 19
Table 1. Con .
Success
Dimension Desc ip ion
Syne gy
exploi a ion
C oss-p ojec coo dina ion includes syne gies ela ed o echnologies, he
ma ke , knowledge, and esou ces [
37
,
38
]. Howe e , p ac ices ocused on his
dimension ‘a e no o en pu in o p ac ice due o he complexi y o he
nume ous in e dependencies wi hin he po olio’ [37] (p. 809).
Po olio
balance
Sho - e m and long- e m bene i s, well-adjus ed isk le el, app op ia e
equilib ium be ween p ojec ypes and be ween use o new and exis ing
echnologies, esou ce adequacy [9,34].
2.4. Social Rep esen a ion Theo y
Social ep esen a ions can be de ined as sys ems o cogni i e elemen s—opinions,
knowledge, and belie s—pa icula o a cul u e, a social ca ego y, o a g oup, wi h ega d o
objec s in he social en i onmen [
39
,
40
]. Social Rep esen a ion Theo y (STR) was o iginally
de eloped o analyze he ela ionship be ween indi iduals and socie y o psychological
s udies. Howe e , SRT can be equally applied o unde s and he ela ionship be ween
a subjec and an objec [
40
,
41
]. Thus, o ins ance, i has been inco po a ed o conduc
quali a i e analysis in di e en ields [
39
,
42
–
44
]. In his ega d, he adop ion o SRT has
g own in di e en a eas o knowledge, including he managemen ield [41].
Th ee main o ien a ions can be iden i ied wi hin SRT, which a e [45] he sociogene ic
model, he sociodynamic model, and he s uc u al model. This esea ch adhe es o a
sociogene ic model. Acco ding o he sociogene ic model, a social ep esen a ion in ol es
wo dis inc bu complemen a y p ocesses: ancho ing and objec i ying. Ancho ing is
de ined as he p ocess by which new in o ma ion is in e p e ed by linking i wi h amilia
knowledge. Objec i ica ion is de ined as he p ocess by which he objec is ep oduced and
desc ibed in a conc e e and selec i e manne [
39
,
40
]. The schema iza ion o he objec is
de ined as he igu a i e co e [40].
In a sociogene ic model o SRT ope a ionaliza ion, monog aphic and quali a i e ap-
p oaches o da a collec ion and analysis cons i u e he main me hodological amewo k [
40
],
and he esea che s mainly op ed o obse a ions o in e iews [45].
3. Resea ch Me hodology
3.1. Resea ch Design
In his s udy, he p ojec po olio was conside ed o be an o ganiza ion o an o -
ganiza ional subsys em. A cons uc i ism- ounded scien i ic pa adigm o o ganiza ion
esea ch was adop ed. In o ganiza ional design science, he goal o esea ch using his
app oach is o de elop knowledge o guide design p ocesses [
27
]. In he cons uc i is
iew o o ganiza ional design science, cons uc i is epis emologies and o ganiza ional
design science complemen each o he o gene a e u he knowledge [27].
SRT was adop ed as he heo e ical lens, adhe ing o a sociogene ic model o SRT
ope a ionaliza ion. The cons uc s ‘ isk ac o s’ and ‘p ojec po olio success’ we e de ined
as objec s, while p ac i ione s we e es ablished as subjec s, wi h a goal o unde s anding
he ela ionship be ween he p ac i ione s and hei no ion o wha cons i u es hese con-
s uc s. In ligh o his, an explo a o y quali a i e esea ch p ocess was unde aken. Social
ep esen a ion was ocused on desc ibing he objec i ica ion o he wo cons uc s unde
analysis: ‘ isk ac o s’ and ‘p ojec po olio success’.
3.2. Da a Collec ion
A semi-s uc u ed in e iew me hod can p o ide o build explana ions o a speci ic,
clea opic so ha issues p e iously de ined can be add essed [
46
]. In his ega d, he
li e a u e e iew on ‘ isk ac o s’ om a po olio pe spec i e and ‘p ojec po olio success’
was used as backg ound o he in e iew design. Thus, he ou isk ac o ca ego ies

Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 6 o 19
p oposed by Micán e al. [
21
] (see Sec ion 2.2) we e de ined as ini ial hemes ega ding he
cons uc ‘ isk ac o s’, de ining hem as isk ac o ca ego ies, and he i e ‘p ojec po olio
success’ dimensions desc ibed in Table 1(see Sec ion 2.3) we e es ablished as ini ial hemes
conce ning he cons uc ‘p ojec po olio success’.
Nex , an in e iew guide o p o ocol was de ined and ollowed. The in e iews
comp ise he b oade -scope esea ch p ojec wi hin which his s udy is amed, so he e o e,
he in e iew p o ocol included addi ional issues o he wo cons uc s epo ed in his
pape . Appendix Adesc ibes he in e iew blocks and ques ions. The in e iew p o ocol
consis ed o ou main blocks o ques ions (blocks wo o i e in Appendix A). This pape
epo s in de ail da a associa ed wi h he cons uc s ‘ isk ac o s’ and ‘p ojec po olio
success’. These cons uc s we e mainly associa ed wi h blocks wo and h ee. Howe e ,
in o ma ion ega ding hose cons uc s migh also ha e been men ioned by in e iewees
in he ou h o i h in e iew blocks. ‘Wha c i e ia/dimension migh ep esen p ojec
po olio success dimensions?’ was he main ques ion in block wo. ‘Could you iden i y
ypes o isks, g oups o isks, o ca ego ies o isk ha should be conside ed a he p ojec
po olio le el?’ was he main ques ion in block h ee.
P io o he in e iew, all pa icipan s ecei ed a b ie ing documen by email, which
cla i ied he esea ch scope, he main in e iew ques ions, anonymi y and con iden iali y
conce ns, and he key e ms adop ed. Whe e app op ia e, supplemen a y ques ions we e
used o p omp mo e de ailed esponses o he abo e ques ions. The in e iews we e
eco ded wi h he p io au ho iza ion o each in e iewee. Handw i en no es we e aken
du ing in e iews. This s udy was ocused on he p o essional expe ience o he in e -
iewees. Twen y-eigh in e iews we e ca ied ou . The in e iews las ed 53 minu es on
a e age. The in e iewees’ a ge p o ile was Colombian p o essionals wi h expe ience as,
o ela ed o, p ojec po olio manage s o as head o a p ojec po olio o ice, and wi h
expe ience in po olios o o ganiza ional de elopmen p ojec s.
O ganiza ional de elopmen p ojec s, also desc ibed as in e nal de elopmen p ojec s,
can be composed o a mix o business p ocess de elopmen , in e nal in o ma ion ech-
nology de elopmen , o ganiza ional change o e-enginee ing, and in es men s in new
equipmen , majo so wa e, and o he capi al p ojec s [
24
]. Thus, gi en he na u e o
o ganiza ional de elopmen p ojec po olios, mos in e iewees exp essed p o essional
expe ience associa ed wi h di e en ypes o p ojec s o mixed p ojec s. Fo ins ance, e-
e ing o he cu en ole, in e iewee se en men ioned: ‘I ha e managed ou ypes o
p ojec s: enginee ing, unde s ood as p ocesses au oma ion; in as uc u e, associa ed wi h
ci il and a chi ec u e wo ks; echnological, ela ed o so wa e solu ions; and managemen ,
hose ha ha e egula o y compliances’. Simila ly, e e ing o a p e ious p o essional expe-
ience, in e iewee nine men ioned: ‘The e we e p ojec s o all kinds, la ge o ganiza ional
p ojec s, in as uc u e p ojec s, and o he s’.
Hence, 17 in e iewees exp essed ha ing expe ience in managing mixed p ojec s (MX),
while se en, h ee, and one o he in e iewees men ioned ha hei p ima y p o essional
expe ience was associa ed wi h enginee ing p ojec s (EN), echnology in o ma ion p ojec s
(TI), and new p oduc p ojec s (NP), espec i ely. Addi ionally, conside ing he classi ica-
ion o o ganiza ions p oposed by Mülle e al. [
47
], 50%, 28%, and 22% o he in e iewees
had hei p ima y expe ience in p ocess-o ien ed, p ojec -o ien ed, and p ojec -based o ga-
niza ions, espec i ely. Table 2shows a de ailed cha ac e iza ion o he in e iewees.
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 7 o 19
Table 2. Cha ac e iza ion o in e iewees.
No. Du a ion
(min)
P ojec
Managemen
Expe ience
(Yea s)
PPM
Expe ience
(Yea s)
P ima y
Expe ience:
Type o
P ojec s
P ima y
Expe ience: Type
o O ganiza ion
Role
1 60 10 7 MX P ojec -based P ojec po olio manage
2 59 6 4 MX P ojec -based P ojec po olio manage
3 49 4 2 EN P ojec -based P ojec po olio manage
4 50 20 3 TI P ojec -o ien ed P ojec manage
5 47 8 4 EN P ojec -based P ojec po olio manage
6 61 9 1 MX P ojec -based P ojec po olio manage
7 60 11 4 MX P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
8 56 10 2 MX P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
9 73 15 5 MX P ojec -o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
10 45 11 5 MX P ojec -o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
11 50 10 3 EN P ojec -based P ojec po olio manage
12 57 8 3 MX P ocess-o ien ed Head o imp o emen o ice
13 48 5 2 NP P ojec -o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
14 60 13 10 MX P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
15 51 20 8 MX P ojec -o ien ed Head o PMO
16 66 7 3 MX P ojec -o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
17 46 12 1 TI P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
18 31 20 5 MX P ocess-o ien ed Execu i e di ec o
19 73 15 5 MX P ocess-o ien ed Head o PMO
20 46 3 1 EN P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
21 59 4 1 MX P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
22 41 15 7 EN P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
23 49 7 3 MX P ojec -o ien ed Execu i e di ec o
24 47 15 10 EN P ocess-o ien ed Head o PMO
25 42 7 3 MX P ocess-o ien ed Head o PMO
26 32 7 3 MX P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
27 47 10 4 EN P ocess-o ien ed P ojec po olio manage
28 73 18 7 TI P ojec -o ien ed Head o PMO
3.3. Da a Analysis
The quali a i e analysis o he answe s was gea ed owa ds iden i ying he aspec s
ha compound he igu a i e co e o he cons uc s unde analysis, iden i ying he main a -
gumen s o which each heme was conside ed ele an o no ele an by he in e iewees.
I in ol es, he e o e, iden i ying he quali a i e a gumen s ha es ablish whe he o no a
heme is pa o he igu a i e co e.
To analyze he empi ical da a, a hema ic analysis was conduc ed. Thema ic analysis
(TA) is de ined as an adequa e heo y-building echnique ha is ocused on analyzing
pa e ns o hemes [
48
]. Thema ic analysis has been in eg a ed in o da a analysis in s udies
de eloped unde SRT wi hin di e en heo e ical o ien a ions (see [
49
]). I has also been
inco po a ed o conduc a quali a i e analysis o in e iew da a in s udies de eloped unde
SRT [
39
]. TA app oaches can be classi ied as coding eliabili y app oaches, codebook
app oaches, o e lexi e app oaches, which di e in he way hemes a e concep ualized
(Te y e al.) [
50
]. Fo his esea ch, a e lexi e TA app oach was adop ed. In e lexi e TA a
heme is concep ualized as analy ic ou pu s ha ep esen sha ed meaning-based pa e ns,
o ganized a ound a co e concep o idea [
48
]. A six-s ep p ocedu e was conduc ed [
48
]: (i)
amilia iza ion; (ii) gene a ing codes; (iii) cons uc ing hemes; (i ) e ising; ( ) de ining
hemes; and ( i) p oducing he epo .
The amilia iza ion s ep was ca ied ou based on lis ening o a sample o in e iew
eco ds and eading all he in e iew ansc ip ions and handw i en no es. The da a om
in e iewees we e ini ially g ouped acco ding o he ou ‘ isk ac o s’ ca ego ies and i e
‘p ojec po olio success’ dimensions iden i ied in he li e a u e (see Sec ions 2.2 and 2.3).
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 8 o 19
This g ouping s a egy se ed o iden i y whe he he in e iewees men ioned new o
complemen a y isk ca ego ies o success dimensions.
In he code gene a ing s ep, i was es ablished ha he analysis p ocess would be
ca ied ou in blocks o ou in e iews a a ime. A i s possible se o codes de i ed
om he analysis o he i s block o ou in e iews was p e-de ined. Consequen ly, he
codes we e upda ed in each cycle o analysis; o do so, codes we e me ged, added, o spli
acco ding o each new g oup o da a. Fo his s ep, a sen ence was de ined as he uni o
da a analysis. Then, as a esul o his s ep, six codes we e gene a ed o ‘Risk ac o s’ and
se en codes o ‘p ojec po olio success’. Table 3shows an example o codes de i ed
om in e iew analysis. In he case o he cons uc ‘p ojec po olio success’, he codes
co espond di ec ly o he success dimensions men ioned by he in e iewees.
Table 3. Cons uc s, codes, and hemes.
Cons uc Codes
Themes *
T1 T2 T3 T4
Risk ac o s
P ojec s and p og ams X
Po olio X
O ganiza ion X
Impac on se e al p ojec s X
Impac on po olio X
Impac on po olio ou comes X
P ojec po olio
success
S a egic i X
Fu u e p epa edness X
S akeholde sa is ac ion X
Economic impac X
A e age P ojec success X
Po olio balance X
Syne gies exploi a ion X
*
T1:
Sou ces amed in he p ojec po olio as an o ganiza ional uni ;
T2:
Risk as an ex ension o he impac
gene a ed;
T3:
Success dimensions linked o po olio ou comes;
T4:
Success dimensions no linked o po olio
ou comes.
Based on he codes de ined, he s eps o cons uc ing hemes, e ising hemes, and
de ining hemes we e ca ied ou o ob ain g oups o da a wi h sha ed meaning-based
pa e ns ega ding he cons uc s unde s udy. This p ocess was o ien ed so as o ensu e
ha each heme was ela ed o a cen al meaning. Each in e iew was ansc ibed. The
coding p ocess was suppo ed by NVIVO so wa e.
These ou hemes g ouped he in o ma ion p o ided by in e iewees ega ding ‘ isk
ac o s’ and ‘p ojec po olio success’. Howe e , hese hemes do no en i ely ep esen
he igu a i e co e o ‘p ojec po olio isk’ de i ed om bo h cons uc s. In his ega d,
he heme ‘Success dimensions no linked o po olio ou comes’ e e s o success dimensions
men ioned by in e iewees ha we e associa ed wi h PPM success a he han p ojec
po olio success i sel . In o he wo ds, he in e iewees did no associa e he success
dimensions ha a e pa o his heme as ep esen ing p ojec po olio esul s om an
o ganiza ional iew. The e o e, based on he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ concep ualiza ion
adop ed, his heme was disc edi ed as pa o he igu a i e co e om he pe spec i es o
Colombian p ac i ione s.
Thus, hemes ‘Sou ces amed in he p ojec po olio as an o ganiza ional uni ’, ‘Risk
as an ex ension o he impac gene a ed’, and ‘Success dimensions linked o po olio
ou comes’ ep esen he igu a i e co e o ‘p ojec po olio isk’, based on he ‘ isk ac o s’
and ‘p ojec po olio success’ cons uc s in po olios o o ganiza ional de elopmen
p ojec s om he pe spec i es o Colombian p ac i ione s. Consequen ly, hese h ee hemes
we e de ined as he p ima y objec i ica ion g oups o ‘p ojec po olio isk’ eme ging om
Colombian p ac i ione s’ pe spec i es. The indings ega ding hese objec i ica ion g oups
a e epo ed in Sec ion 4.
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 9 o 19
3.4. In e nal and Ex e nal Validi y
The ansc ip ion and coding p ocesses o all in e iews we e ca ied ou by he same
esea che (in e iewe ), hus ensu ing consis ency o coding. To check he in e nal alidi y
o he coding p ocess, he emaining wo esea che s in ol ed in he p ojec we e asked o
audi he ail o he key coding decisions a ising om he esea ch p ocess.
Rela ing o ex e nal alidi y, he small and segmen ed samples equen ly used in
quali a i e esea ch limi he gene alizabili y o such s udies [
46
]. Thus, as in he s udy
ca ied ou by an de Hoo n and Whi y [
51
], heo e ical and manage ial con ibu ions a e
empe ed by he quali a i e na u e o his s udy and he cha ac e is ics o he sample.
Pa icipan s we e selec ed by con enience sampling, he mos common sampling
s a egy in his ype o s udy, as he in e iewees’ pa icipa ion is associa ed wi h hei a ail-
abili y and in e es in pa icipa ing a he han an alea o y selec ion o pa icipan s
[52,53]
.
The e o e, a s a is ical index canno be es ablished ega ding he ep esen a i eness o he
sample. The li e a u e sugges s ha a sample size be ween 5 and 30 in e iewees allows
o unde s anding o commonali ies wi hin an objec i e g oup [46,54].
P e ious s udies a i m ha sample size inc eases when he pa icipan g oup is
he e ogenous [
46
,
53
,
55
]. Howe e , as he in e iewees’ p o ile was exclusi ely o ien ed
owa ds Colombian po olio p ac i ione s wi h expe ience in po olios o o ganiza ional
de elopmen p ojec s, he pa icipan g oup can be conside ed homogeneous. The e o e,
he sample size o wen y-eigh in e iews conduc ed in his s udy is adequa e o un-
de s anding commonali ies wi hin he in e iewees’ g oup, i.e., iden i ying he igu a i e
co e ega ding he wo cons uc s unde s udy. Ne e heless, he sample’s homogenei y
limi s he esul s’ gene alizabili y. Rega ding his conce n, wo main h ea s o he ex e nal
alidi y o he indings and implica ions mus be conside ed: i) he geog aphical ocus
ep esen ed in he ac ha only Colombian p o essionals we e in e iewed, and ii) he
ocus on a speci ic ype o p ojec po olio, namely, o ganiza ional de elopmen p ojec
po olios.
4. Findings
4.1. P ojec Po olio Risk Fac o s
Conce ning he objec i ica ion o he ‘ isk ac o s’, wo p ima y objec i ica ion g oups
eme ged: sou ces amed in he p ojec po olio as an o ganiza ional uni , and isk as
an ex ension o he impac gene a ed. These p ima y g oups compounded o o m he
igu a i e co e o he ‘ isk ac o s’.
Conce ning he i s p ima y ep esen a ion, he p ac i ione s exp essed ha isk could
be de i ed om: each p ojec , whe e he p ojec s ep esen he cons i uen componen s o
he po olio; isk sou ces associa ed wi h he p ojec po olio le el in which he p ojec
po olio is, in i sel , a uni o managemen ; and isk de i ed om he in e ac ion o he
po olio wi h he o ganiza ion, o e en de i ed a he o ganiza ional le el, ecognizing he
in e ac ion o he p ojec po olio wi h o he o ganiza ional uni s.
Risk sou ces associa ed wi h p oblems wi h po olio- inancing capi al and p oblems
de i ed om po olio s uc u e, which a e pa o he ca ego y o o ganiza ional condi ions,
we e he isks mos o en acknowledged by he in e iewees conce ning isk sou ces
de i ed om he o ganiza ional le el. Fo example, in e iewee 9 men ioned ha ‘a
s akeholde wi h high o ganiza ional in luence can a ec o modi y he po olio s uc u e
in he w ong way [
. . .
] gene a ing isk o he po olio’s success’. Likewise, isks such
as changes in he compe i i e en i onmen and changes in ex e nal condi ions ela ed o
no ms and e e ence models, which a e pa o he ca ego y o ex e nal condi ions, we e
equen ly highligh ed by he in e iewees.
Conce ning isk ela ed o he ca ego y o PPM le el, ‘p ojec po olio isk’ associa ed
wi h an inadequa e dis ibu ion o in o ma ion, imbalanced managemen o s akeholde
expec a ions, o lack o capabili y a bo h PPM and p ojec managemen le els we e all
epea edly men ioned. In e iewee 1 commen ed on lack o capabili y: ‘I had cases whe e
a good p ojec manage was p omo ed o po olio manage bu he abili ies equi ed
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 16 o 19
Finally, he indings help di e en ia e be ween po olio isk, he inancial isk aken
on by he o ganiza ion de i ed om he in es men in he po olio, and he isk associa ed
wi h he p ojec s. In p ac ical e ms, he sugges ed isk concep ualiza ion ei he subs i u es
he inancial pe spec i e o po olio isk, which is usually conside ed o p ojec po olio
selec ion o he isk assessmen o each p ojec , o complemen s i . In his ega d, coo di-
na ion mechanisms be ween ‘p ojec po olio isk’ and o he o ganiza ional isk sys ems,
i.e., ope a ional, s a egic, o p ojec isk app oaches, should be conside ed.
6. Conclusions
This pape p o ides empi ical e idence o back up he cons uc s o ‘ isk ac o s’ and
‘p ojec po olio success’ in po olios o o ganiza ional de elopmen p ojec s and discloses
how hey could be linked unde he cons uc ‘p ojec po olio isk’ as a measu e o impac
on ‘p ojec po olio success’ due o changes in ‘ isk ac o s’. The sugges ed ‘p ojec po olio
isk’ concep ualiza ion allows o ecogni ion, om a isk pe spec i e, ha o ganiza ional
de elopmen p ojec po olios a e designed o in luence s a egic pe o mance and help o
achie e a sus ainable compe i i e posi ion.
Acco ding o he p ac i ione s’ objec i ica ion, he ‘ isk ac o s’ we e ep esen ed as isk
ac o ca ego ies oo ed a he po olio, p ojec , and o ganiza ional le els, and which can
lead o gene al impac s ei he on all p ojec s wi hin he po olio (sys ema ic impac s), on a
speci ic p ojec o p ojec s, which, in u n, a ec he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ (non-sys ema ic
impac s), o di ec ly on he expec ed p ojec po olio ou comes.
When adop ing he ‘p ojec po olio success’ as a se o dimensions on which he
‘p ojec po olio isk’ could be measu ed, i was posed ha ‘p ojec po olio isk’ could
be measu ed based on he e ec i eness o he po olio. As such, acco ding o he p ac-
i ione s’ objec i ica ion, s a egic i , u u e p epa edness, and s akeholde sa is ac ion
we e p oposed as mul idimensional ou comes on which he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ could be
measu ed.
A Social Rep esen a ion Theo y lens helped us o unde s and he objec i ica ion o he
cons uc s, and consequen ly o iden i y a igu a i e co e o hese cons uc s. Howe e ,
om a me hodological s andpoin , a limi a ion o his s udy is he analysis o he ancho ing
p ocess o hese cons uc s. The empi ical esul s he e epo ed can nei he be di ec ly ex-
ended o o he ypes o po olios no assumed as ep esen a i e o po olio p ac i ione s’
pe spec i es in o he coun ies. This limi a ion is in line wi h he esea ch pa adigm adop ed
in his esea ch: a cons uc i ism- ounded scien i ic pa adigm o o ganiza ion esea ch. In
his ega d, ‘ he cons uc i is iew o o ganiza ional design science con on s esea che s
wi h he issues o gene alizing local knowledge and jus i ying gene aliza ion’ [
27
] (p. 1240).
Al hough he sugges ed ‘p ojec po olio isk’ concep ualiza ion co esponds o local
knowledge, i p o ides aluable insigh and knowledge ega ding how he isk associa ed
wi h o ganiza ional de elopmen p ojec po olios could be ep esen ed when he inhe en
s a egic na u e o his ype o po olio is conside ed. Thus, a he han p o iding a
gene alized concep ualiza ion, he indings and implica ions o his s udy open he pa h o
u he esea ch in he ield, including bo h explo a o y and con i ma o y s udies. Thus, o
ins ance, eplica ing he s udy conside ing a di e en and la ge sample and agg ega ing
he esul s would help o see how he sugges ed ‘p ojec po olio isk’ concep ualiza ion
would e ol e.
Fu u e esea ch is equi ed o explo ing he inco po a ion o he ‘p ojec po olio isk’
concep ualiza ion he e epo ed in o ‘p ojec po olio isk’ assessmen and isk esponse
planning. Fu he esea ch could also be conduc ed on de ining how o es ablish speci ic
me ics o assessing he ‘p ojec po olio isk’ based on ‘p ojec po olio success’.
Au ho Con ibu ions:
Concep ualiza ion, C.M., G.F. and M.A.; Da a cu a ion, C.M.; Fo mal analysis,
C.M.; Funding acquisi ion, C.M., G.F. and M.A.; In es iga ion, C.M.; Me hodology, C.M.; P ojec
adminis a ion, C.M.; Resou ces, C.M., G.F. and M.A.; So wa e, C.M.; Supe ision, G.F. and M.A.;
Valida ion, G.F. and M.A.; Visualiza ion, C.M.; W i ing—o iginal d a , C.M.; W i ing— e iew and
edi ing, G.F. and M.A. All au ho s ha e ead and ag eed o he published e sion o he manusc ip .

Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 17 o 19
Funding:
This esea ch was sponso ed by Col u u o-Colciencias, Colombia, by FEDER unds
h ough he p og am COMPETE–P og ama Ope acional Fac o es de Compe i i idade–and by na-
ional unds h ough FCT–Fundação pa a a Ciência e a Tecnologia–, unde he emi o p ojec s
UID/EMS/00285/2020 and UIDB/00319/2020.
Ins i u ional Re iew Boa d S a emen : No applicable.
In o med Consen S a emen :
In o med consen was ob ained om all subjec s in ol ed in he s udy.
Da a A ailabili y S a emen : No applicable.
Acknowledgmen s:
The au ho s g a e ully acknowledge he con ibu ions o he wen y-eigh in e -
iewees who pa icipa ed in he s udy.
Con lic s o In e es :
The au ho s decla e no con lic o in e es . The unde s had no ole in he design
o he s udy; in he collec ion, analyses, o in e p e a ion o da a; in he w i ing o he manusc ip , o
in he decision o publish he esul s.
Appendix A
Table A1. In e iew blocks and ques ions.
Block Objec i e Ques ions
1Cla i y he in e iew scope and he
in e iewee’s backg ound
Do you wan o know mo e abou he esea ch p ojec o abou he in e iew?
Can you gi e me a sho in oduc ion o you p o essional backg ound
ega ding p ojec managemen and po olio managemen ?
2
Iden i y pe cep ions o dimensions ha
could be associa ed wi h p ojec po olio
success.
Wha c i e ia/dimension migh ep esen p ojec po olio success
dimensions?
Do you pe cei e
<<name o a p ojec po olio success dimension iden i ied in he li e a u e>>
as ele an o p ojec po olio isk assessmen ?
3
Iden i y pe cep ions o ca ego ies in
which p ojec po olio isk could be
analyzed
Could you iden i y ypes o isks, g oups o isks, o ca ego ies o isks ha
should be conside ed a he p ojec po olio le el?
Do you pe cei e
<<name o a PPR ca ego y iden i ied in he li e a u e >>
as
a ele an ca ego y o p ojec po olio isk assessmen ?
4
Iden i y pe cep ions o componen s o
P ojec Po olio Risk Assessmen (PPRA)
ha should be conside ed o designing
and conduc ing PPRA.
Could you iden i y he main aspec s o componen s ha should be
conside ed o an adequa e PPRA?
Do you pe cei e <<name o a PPR componen iden i ied in he li e a u e>>
as a componen o p ojec po olio isk assessmen ?
5
Ob ain addi ional in o ma ion conside ed
impo an om he in e iewee’s
pe spec i e ega ding PPR assessmen
Do you conside ha he e a e o he aspec s ha should be measu ed o
conside ed as pa o PPRA?
Do you wan o add any hing?
Re e ences
1.
Dob o olskiene, N.; Tamošiuniene, R. Sus ainabili y-O ien ed Financial Resou ce Alloca ion in a P ojec Po olio h ough
Mul i-C i e ia Decision-Making. Sus ainabili y 2016,8, 485. [C ossRe ]
2.
Richa d, S.; Pelle in, R.; Bellema e, J.; Pe ie , N. A Business P ocess and Po olio Managemen App oach o Indus y 4.0
T ans o ma ion. Bus. P ocess Manag. J. 2021,27, 505–528. [C ossRe ]
3.
B ook, J.W.; Pagnanelli, F. In eg a ing Sus ainabili y in o Inno a ion P ojec Po olio Managemen —A S a egic Pe spec i e. J.
Eng. Technol. Manag. 2014,34, 46–62. [C ossRe ]
4. PMI. The S anda d o Po olio Managemen , 4 h ed.; P ojec Managemen Ins i u e, Inc.: Delawa e, PA, USA, 2017.
5.
Ho man, M.; Spalek, S.; G ela, G. Shedding New Ligh on P ojec Po olio Risk Managemen . Sus ainabili y
2017
,9, 1798.
[C ossRe ]
6.
de Oli ei a Lace da, R.T.; Ensslin, L.; Ensslin, S.R. A Pe o mance Measu emen F amewo k in Po olio Managemen : A
Cons uc i is Case. Manag. Decis. 2011,49, 648–668. [C ossRe ]
7.
Annosi, M.C.; Ma chegiani, L.; Vicen ini, F. Knowledge T ansla ion in P ojec Po olio Decision-Making: The Role o O -
ganiza ional Alignmen and In o ma ion Suppo Sys em in Selec ing Inno a i e Ideas. Manag. Decis.
2020
,58, 1929–1951.
[C ossRe ]
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 18 o 19
8.
Ma ins, C.L.; López, H.M.L.; De Almeida, A.T.; Almeida, J.A.; De Oli ei a Bo oluzzi, M.B. An MCDM P ojec Po olio
Web-Based DSS o Sus ainable S a egic Decision Making in an Elec ici y Company. Ind. Manag. Da a Sys .
2017
,117, 1362–1375.
[C ossRe ]
9.
Ghasemi, F.; Sa i, M.H.M.; Youse i, V.; Falsa i, R.; Tamošai ien
˙
e, J. P ojec Po olio Risk Iden i ica ion and Analysis, Conside ing
P ojec Risk In e ac ions and Using Bayesian Ne wo ks. Sus ainabili y 2018,10, 1609. [C ossRe ]
10.
C o ini, C.; San o o, G.; Ossola, G. Re hinking Risk Managemen in En ep eneu ial SMEs: Towa ds he In eg a ion wi h he
Decision-Making P ocess. Manag. Decis. 2020,59, 1085–1113. [C ossRe ]
11.
Zhao, X.; Hwang, B.G.; Low, S.P. En e p ise Risk Managemen Implemen a ion in Cons uc ion Fi ms: An O ganiza ional Change
Pe spec i e. Manag. Decis. 2014,52, 814–833. [C ossRe ]
12.
Libiao, B.; Liu, J.; Huang, N.; Zheng, K.; Hao, T. C i ical In e ac i e Risks in P ojec Po olios om he Li e Cycle Pe spec i e.
Asia-Pac. J. Ope . Res. 2022, 2250007. [C ossRe ]
13.
Telle , J. Po olio Risk Managemen and I s Con ibu ion o P ojec Po olio Success: An In es iga ion o O ganiza ion, P ocess,
and Cul u e. P oj. Manag. J. 2013,44, 36–51. [C ossRe ]
14.
Olsson, R. Risk Managemen in a Mul i-P ojec En i onmen : An App oach o Manage Po olio Risks. In . J. Qual. Reliab. Manag.
2008,25, 60–71. [C ossRe ]
15.
Youse i, V.; Haji, S.; Sapa auskas, J.; Kiani, S. The Impac Made on P ojec Po olio Op imisa ion by he Selec ion o Va ious Risk
Measu es. Eng. Econ. 2018,29, 168–175. [C ossRe ]
16. C ouhy, M.; Galai, D.; Ma k, R. The Essen ials o Risk Managemen ; McG aw-Hill: New Yo k, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 1.
17.
Tang, B.J.; Zhou, H.L.; Cao, H. Selec ion o O e seas Oil and Gas P ojec s unde Low Oil P ice. J. Pe . Sci. Eng.
2017
,156, 160–166.
[C ossRe ]
18.
Quenum, A.; Tho isson, H.; Wu, D.; Lambe , J.H. Resilience o Business S a egy o Eme gen and Fu u e Condi ions. J. Risk Res.
2021,24, 870–888. [C ossRe ]
19.
Tamošai ien
˙
e, J.; Youse i, V.; Tabasi, H. P ojec Po olio Cons uc ion Using Ex eme Value Theo y. Sus ainabili y
2021
,13, 855.
[C ossRe ]
20.
Ahmadi-Ja id, A.; Fa eminia, S.H.; Gemünden, H.G. A Me hod o Risk Response Planning in P ojec Po olio Managemen .
P oj. Manag. J. 2020,51, 77–95. [C ossRe ]
21.
Micán, C.; Fe nandes, G.; A aújo, M. P ojec Po olio Risk Managemen : A S uc u ed Li e a u e Re iew wi h Fu u e Di ec ions
o Resea ch. In . J. In . Sys . P oj. Manag. 2020,8, 67–84. [C ossRe ]
22.
Yang, Q.; Zou, X.; Ye, Y.; Yao, T. E alua ing he C i icali y o he P oduc De elopmen P ojec Po olio Ne wo k om he
Pe spec i e o Risk P opaga ion. Phys. A S a . Mech. I s Appl. 2022,593, 126901. [C ossRe ]
23.
Zou, X.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Q. Analysing he Risk P opaga ion in he P ojec Po olio Ne wo k Using he SIRF Model. In P oceedings
o he 10 h In e na ional Con e ence on Ope a ions Resea ch and En e p ise Sys ems, ICORES 2021, Online S eaming, 4–6
Feb ua y 2021; pp. 226–232.
24.
Elonen, S.; A o, K.A. P oblems in Managing In e nal De elopmen P ojec s in Mul i-P ojec En i onmen s. In . J. P oj. Manag.
2003,21, 395–402. [C ossRe ]
25.
Bushuye , S.; Bushuie a, V.; Onyshchenko, S.; Pa lo a, N. Agile-T ans o ma ion O ganiza ional De elopmen Based on Po olio
Managemen . In P oceedings o he 11 h IEEE In e na ional Con e ence on In elligen Da a Acquisi ion and Ad anced Compu ing
Sys ems: Technology and Applica ions, C acow, Poland, 22–25 Sep embe 2021; pp. 444–451.
26.
Bushuye , S.; Onyshchenko, S.; Bushuye a, N.; Bonda , A. Modelling P ojec s Po olio S uc u e Dynamics o he O ganiza ion
De elopmen wi h a Resis ance o In o ma ion En opy. In P oceedings o he In e na ional Con e ence on Compu e Sciences
and In o ma ion Technologies, L i , Uk aine, 22–25 Sep embe 2021; pp. 293–298.
27. A enie , M.J. Shaping a Cons uc i is View o O ganiza ional Design Science. O gan. S ud. 2010,31, 1229–1255. [C ossRe ]
28.
Xu, W.; Liu, G.; Li, H.; Luo, W. A S udy on P ojec Po olio Models wi h Skewness Risk and S a ing. In . J. Fuzzy Sys .
2017
,19,
2033–2047. [C ossRe ]
29.
Sanchez, H.; Robe , B. Measu ing Po olio S a egic Pe o mance Using Key Pe o mance Indica o s. P oj. Manag. J.
2010
,41,
64–73. [C ossRe ]
30.
Wu, L.H.; Wu, L.; Shi, J.; Chou, Y.T. P ojec Po olio Selec ion Conside ing Unce ain y: S ochas ic Dominance-Based Fuzzy
Ranking. In . J. Fuzzy Sys . 2021,23, 2048–2066. [C ossRe ]
31.
Neumeie , A.; Radszuwill, S.; Ga izy, T.Z. Modeling P ojec C i icali y in IT P ojec Po olios. In . J. P oj. Manag.
2018
,36,
833–844. [C ossRe ]
32.
Cos a, H.R.; Ba os, M.d.O.; T a assos, G.H. E alua ing So wa e P ojec Po olio Risks. J. Sys . So w.
2007
,80, 16–31. [C ossRe ]
33. D ake, J.R.; By d, T.A. Risk in In o ma ion Technology P ojec Po olio Managemen . J. In . Technol. Theo y Appl. 2006,8, 3.
34.
Voss, M. Impac o Cus ome In eg a ion on P ojec Po olio Managemen and I s Success-De eloping a Concep ual F amewo k.
In . J. P oj. Manag. 2012,30, 567–581. [C ossRe ]
35.
Telle , J.; Kock, A. An Empi ical In es iga ion on How Po olio Risk Managemen In luences P ojec Po olio Success. In . J. P oj.
Manag. 2013,31, 817–829. [C ossRe ]
36.
Coope , R.G.; Edge , S.J.; Kleinschmid , E.J. Po olio Managemen : Fundamen al o New P oduc Success. PDMA Toolb. New
P od. De . 2002,9, 331–364. [C ossRe ]
Sus ainabili y 2022,14, 5235 19 o 19
37.
Meskendahl, S. The In luence o Business S a egy on P ojec Po olio Managemen and I s Success—A Concep ual F amewo k.
In . J. P oj. Manag. 2010,28, 807–817. [C ossRe ]
38. Pe o, Y.; Ga dine , P. An In es iga ion o he In luence o O ganiza ional Design on P ojec Po olio Success, E ec i eness and
Business E iciency o P ojec -Based O ganiza ions. In . J. P oj. Manag. 2015,33, 1717–1729. [C ossRe ]
39.
Be gquis , P.; Ansolabehe e, S.; Ca ley, S.; Konisky, D. Backya d Voices: How Sense o Place Shapes Views o La ge-Scale Ene gy
T ansmission In as uc u e. Ene gy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020,63, 101396. [C ossRe ]
40.
Ra eau, P.; Moline , P.; Ab ic, J.; Moline , P. Social Rep esen a ion Theo y. In Handbook o Theo ies o Social Psychology: Volume 2;
Van Lange, P., K uglnski, A., Higgins, T., Eds.; SAGE Publica ions: London, UK, 2012; pp. 477–498.
41.
Joia, L.A.; Melon, M. The Social Rep esen a ion o Success in IT P ojec s. In . J. Manag. P oj. Bus.
2020
,13, 1578–1599. [C ossRe ]
42.
Baquiano, M.J. Unde s anding Coas al Resou ce Managemen Using a Social Rep esen a ions App oach. Ocean Coas . Manag.
2016,133, 18–27. [C ossRe ]
43.
Ande son, N.M.; Williams, K.J.H.; Fo d, R.M. Communi y Pe cep ions o Plan a ion Fo es y: The Associa ion be ween Place
Meanings and Social Rep esen a ions o a Con en ious Ru al Land Use. J. En i on. Psychol. 2013,34, 121–136. [C ossRe ]
44.
C aciun, C.; Flick, U. I Will Ne e Be he G anny wi h Rosy Cheeks: Pe cep ions o Aging in P eca ious and Financially Secu e
Middle-Aged Ge mans. J. Aging S ud. 2014,29, 78–87. [C ossRe ]
45.
Ra eau, P.; Lo Monaco, G. La Théo ie Des Rep ésen a ions Sociales: O ien a ions Concep uelles, Champs d’Applica ions e
Mé hodes. Re . CES Psicol. 2013,6, 1–21.
46. Saunde s, M.; Lewis, P.; Tho nhill, A. Resea ch Me hods o Business S uden s, 8 h ed.; Pea son Educa ion: London, UK, 2019.
47.
Mülle , R.; D ouin, N.; Sanka an, S. Modeling O ganiza ional P ojec Managemen . P oj. Manag. J.
2019
,50, 499–513. [C ossRe ]
48.
B aun, V.; Cla ke, V.; Hay ield, N.; Te y, G. Thema ic Analysis. In Handbook o Resea ch Me hods in Heal h Social Sciences;
Liampu ong, P., Ed.; Sp inge : Singapu e, Singapu e, 2019; pp. 843–860.
49.
Ceballos, L.M.; RojasDeF ancisco, L.; Mon oy Oso io, J.C. The Role o a Fashion Spo ligh E en in a P ocess o Ci y Image
Recons uc ion. J. Des in. Ma k. Manag. 2020,17, 100464. [C ossRe ]
50.
Te y, G.; Hay ield, N.; Cla e, V.; B aun, V. Thema ic Analysis. In The SAGE Handbook o Quali a i e Resea ch in Psychology; SAGE
Publica ions L d.: London, UK, 2017; pp. 17–36.
51.
an de Hoo n, B.; Whi y, S.J. The Fi e Modes o Compo men o P ojec Managing: Disclosing he Taci in P ojec Wo k. In . J.
P oj. Manag. 2019,37, 363–377. [C ossRe ]
52.
Mac Donald, K.; Rezania, D.; Bake , R. A G ounded Theo y Examina ion o P ojec Manage s’ Accoun abili y. In . J. P oj. Manag.
2020,38, 27–35. [C ossRe ]
53.
Gues , G.; Bunce, A.; Johnson, L. How Many In e iews A e Enough?: An Expe imen wi h Da a Sa u a ion and Va iabili y. Field
Me hods 2006,18, 59–82. [C ossRe ]
54.
C eswell, J.W. Resea ch Design: Quali a i e, Quan i a i e, and Mixed Me hods App oaches; SAGE Publica ions: Sou he n Oaks, CA,
USA, 2014.
55.
Michael, P. Pa on, Michael Quinn. Quali a i e Resea ch & E alua ion Me hods: In eg a ing Theo y and P ac ice; SAGE Publica ions:
Sou he n Oaks, CA, USA, 2014.
56.
Kock, A.; Schulz, B.; Kopmann, J.; Gemünden, H.G. P ojec Po olio Managemen In o ma ion Sys ems’ Posi i e In luence on
Pe o mance—The Impo ance o P ocess Ma u i y. In . J. P oj. Manag. 2020,38, 229–241. [C ossRe ]
57. Jonas, D.; Kock, A.; Gemünden, H.G. P edic ing P ojec Po olio Success by Measu ing Managemen Quali y—A Longi udinal
S udy. IEEE T ans. Eng. Manag. 2013,60, 215–226. [C ossRe ]
58.
Ma insuo, M.; Ge aldi, J. Managemen o P ojec Po olios: Rela ionships o P ojec Po olios wi h Thei Con ex s. In . J. P oj.
Manag. 2020,38, 441–453. [C ossRe ]
59.
Ninan, J.; Mahalingam, A.; Clegg, S. Ex e nal S akeholde Managemen S a egies and Resou ces in Megap ojec s: An O ganiza-
ional Powe Pe spec i e. P oj. Manag. J. 2019,50, 625–640. [C ossRe ]
60.
Abbasi, D.; Ash a i, M.; Ghodsypou , S.H. A Mul i Objec i e-BSC Model o New P oduc De elopmen P ojec Po olio Selec ion.
Expe Sys . Appl. 2020,162, 113757. [C ossRe ]
61.
Ho man, M.; G ela, G. P ojec Po olio Risk Ca ego isa ion—Fac o Analysis Resul s. In . J. In . Sys . P oj. Manag.
2018
,6, 39–58.
[C ossRe ]