scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Accuracy Evaluation and Comparison of Mobile Laser Scanning and Mobile Photogrammetry Data

Abstract

Mobile mapping systems (MMS) are becoming used in standard geodetic tasks more common in the last years. This paper deals with the accuracy evaluation of two types of data acquired by MMS RIEGL VMX-450, and their comparison. The first type is data from mobile laser scanning (MLS). The second type is mobile photogrammetry data. The new high accurate test point field was built in area of Advanced Materials, Structures and Technologies (AdMaS) research centre that is part of Brno University of Technology. Geodetic network and test point field were measured by Trimble R8s GNSS system and Trimble S8 HP total station. The estimate of the 3D standard deviation determined by an adjustment is 2 mm. The accuracy of MLS and mobile photogrammetry data was tested based on the differences between the coordinates of the points determined from the MMS data and determined by before mentioned high precise measurement. The resulting coordinates from photogrammetric data were determined by manual detection of targets in the images. The estimate of the 3D standard deviation is 0.017 m from the MLS data, and 0.061 m from the mobile photogrammetry data. As we supposed, the mobile laser scanning data are significantly more accurate than mobile photogrammetry data. Achieved accuracy of MLS exceeds the original expectations with respect to the GNSS/IMU positioning accuracy, which is according to the manufacturer RIEGL between 0.02-0.05 m. The same scene is often scanned with multiple scanning passes to ensure high quality of the scanned point cloud, therefore we tested the relative accuracy of mobile laser scanning data from two MMS vehicle passes in the same locality of interest. Two different data sets were evaluated, first data set contains points on roads, second data set on buildings. The standard deviation estimate does not exceed 0.008 m and the maximum absolute deviation does not exceed 0.030 m for both data sets. The difference between the two passes is not significant in comparison with the accuracy criteria required for standard mapping purposes. We also compared automatic point cloud production from photogrammetry data processed in Bentley ContextCapture to the point cloud from laser scanning. The MLS data has been used as a reference because it is significantly more accurate as mentioned before. This comparison was done only on the second data set (buildings). The standard deviation estimate is 0.16 m and the maximum absolute deviation is 0.25 m. Our evaluation contains also statistical testing of outliers and stragglers. In contrast to many authors, we don't use the simplified approach 3 rule, and in 1D. We use more exact approach using critical values of the statistics for significance levels = 5 % and = 1 % to stragglers and outliers test in 3D.

Read accessible full text

Accuracy Evaluation and Comparison of Mobile Laser Scanning and Mobile Photogrammetry Data

Author: Kalvoda, Petr; Nosek, Jakub; Kuruc, Michal; Volařík, Tomáš; Kalvodová, Petra
Publisher: IOP Publishing Ltd
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
Source: https://dspace.vut.cz/bitstreams/df40d272-42a7-42e1-8808-b3e315510c8e/download
IOP Con e ence Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Accu acy E alua ion and Compa ison o Mobile Lase Scanning and
Mobile Pho og amme y Da a
To ci e his a icle: Pe Kal oda e al 2020 IOP Con . Se .: Ea h En i on. Sci. 609 012091
View he a icle online o upda es and enhancemen s.
This con en was downloaded om IP add ess 147.229.117.44 on 20/04/2021 a 06:59
Con en om his wo k may be used unde he e ms o heC ea i eCommonsA ibu ion 3.0 licence. Any u he dis ibu ion
o his wo k mus main ain a ibu ion o he au ho (s) and he i le o he wo k, jou nal ci a ion and DOI.
Published unde licence by IOP Publishing L d
6 h Wo ld Mul idisciplina y Ea h Sciences Symposium
IOP Con . Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science 609 (2020) 012091
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
1
Accu acy E alua ion and Compa ison o Mobile Lase
Scanning and Mobile Pho og amme y Da a
Pe Kal oda 1, Jakub Nosek 1, Michal Ku uc 1, Tomas Vola ik 1, Pe a
Kal odo a 1
1 B no Uni e si y o Technology, Ve eří 331/95, B no, Czech Republic
ku uc.m@ ce. u b .cz
Abs ac . Mobile mapping sys ems (MMS) a e becoming used in s anda d geode ic asks mo e
common in he las yea s. This pape deals wi h he accu acy e alua ion o wo ypes o da a
acqui ed by MMS RIEGL VMX-450, and hei compa ison. The i s ype is da a om mobile
lase scanning (MLS). The second ype is mobile pho og amme y da a. The new high accu a e
es poin ield was buil in a ea o Ad anced Ma e ials, S uc u es and Technologies (AdMaS)
esea ch cen e ha is pa o B no Uni e si y o Technology. Geode ic ne wo k and es poin
ield we e measu ed by T imble R8s GNSS sys em and T imble S8 HP o al s a ion. The es ima e
o he 3D s anda d de ia ion de e mined by an adjus men is 2 mm. The accu acy o MLS and
mobile pho og amme y da a was es ed based on he di e ences be ween he coo dina es o he
poin s de e mined om he MMS da a and de e mined by be o e men ioned high p ecise
measu emen . The esul ing coo dina es om pho og amme ic da a we e de e mined by manual
de ec ion o a ge s in he images. The es ima e o he 3D s anda d de ia ion is 0.017 m om he
MLS da a, and 0.061 m om he mobile pho og amme y da a. As we supposed, he mobile lase
scanning da a a e signi ican ly mo e accu a e han mobile pho og amme y da a. Achie ed
accu acy o MLS exceeds he o iginal expec a ions wi h espec o he GNSS/IMU posi ioning
accu acy, which is acco ding o he manu ac u e RIEGL be ween 0.02–0.05 m. The same scene
is o en scanned wi h mul iple scanning passes o ensu e high quali y o he scanned poin cloud,
he e o e we es ed he ela i e accu acy o mobile lase scanning da a om wo MMS ehicle
passes in he same locali y o in e es . Two di e en da a se s we e e alua ed, i s da a se
con ains poin s on oads, second da a se on buildings. The s anda d de ia ion es ima e does no
exceed 0.008 m and he maximum absolu e de ia ion does no exceed 0.030 m o bo h da a se s.
The di e ence be ween he wo passes is no signi ican in compa ison wi h he accu acy c i e ia
equi ed o s anda d mapping pu poses. We also compa ed au oma ic poin cloud p oduc ion
om pho og amme y da a p ocessed in Ben ley Con ex Cap u e o he poin cloud om lase
scanning. The MLS da a has been used as a e e ence because i is signi ican ly mo e accu a e
as men ioned be o e. This compa ison was done only on he second da a se (buildings). The
s anda d de ia ion es ima e is 0.16 m and he maximum absolu e de ia ion is 0.25 m. Ou
e alua ion con ains also s a is ical es ing o ou lie s and s aggle s. In con as o many au ho s,
we don' use he simpli ied app oach 3σ ule, and in 1D. We use mo e exac app oach using
c i ical alues o he s a is ics o signi icance le els α = 5 % and α = 1 % o s aggle s and
ou lie s es in 3D.
6 h Wo ld Mul idisciplina y Ea h Sciences Symposium
IOP Con . Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science 609 (2020) 012091
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
2
1. In oduc ion
Mobile me hods become widely used o cap u e spa ial da a o many applica ions, o example, ci il
enginee ing, oad-su eying, and 3D ci y modeling [1, 2]. The geome ic accu acy o inal p oduc s is
one o he key p ope ies, depends on a la ge numbe o ac o s. Accu acy can be assessed acco ding o
se e al c i e ia. Simply pu , he accu acy o he inal p oduc (3D model) depends on he inpu da a
accu acy, densi y ( esolu ion), and on he algo i hms used.
In he case o mobile lase scanning (MLS), he inpu da a o modeling consis s o egis e ed and
il e ed poin clouds. The basic p e equisi es o he accu acy o he 3D model a e he e o e he accu acy
and densi y o MLS poin clouds. This accu acy can be di ided in o absolu e and ela i e componen s,
which co espond o he posi ioning subsys em and mapping subsys em o MMS. The posi ioning
subsys em uses a Global Na iga ion Sa elli e Sys em (GNSS), Ine ial Measu ing Uni (IMU), and
Dis ance Measu emen Indica o s (DMIs) [3, 4]. The esul o GNSS, IMU, and DMI da a combina ion
in a Kalman il e is Smoo hed Bes Es ima ed T ajec o y (SBET). The accu acy o SBET can be
imp o ed by using con ol poin s [5]. The mapping subsys em pe o ms he spa ial da a acquisi ion and
ypically consis s o one o mo e LIDAR senso s and came as. Accu a e calib a ion o bo h subsys ems
is a p e equisi e o accu a e geo e e enced images and LIDAR da a.
In he case o mobile pho og amme y, he esul ing 3D model can be c ea ed in wo ways: manual
and au oma ic model gene a ion. In he case o manual model gene a ion, he model elemen s a e c ea ed
di ec ly abo e he images. The undamen al elemen s a e poin s and he inal accu acy depends on hei
accu acy. The au oma ic me hod consis s o he poin cloud gene a ion using a ma ching algo i hm [6]
and 3D model c ea ion om his poin cloud (meshing). The accu acy and densi y o he poin cloud is
he basic p e equisi e o he accu acy o he 3D model.
2. MMS desc ip ion
The used MMS RIEGL VMX-450 ( able 1, igu e 1) in eg a es wo RIEGL VQ-450 lase scanne s,
modula VMX-450-CS6 came a sys em wi h ou indus ial came as, POINT GREY ladybug5 sphe ical
came a imaging sys em, GNSS/IMU na iga ion ha dwa e, dis ance measu emen uni VMX-450-DMI
and a po able con ol uni VMX-450-CU.
Table 1. RIEGL VMX-450 echnical cha ac e is ics [7].
Senso
P ope y name
P ope y alue
VQ-450
Measu ing p inciple
Time o Fligh
Max. measu emen a e
1.1 MHz (2×0.55 MHz), ρ ≥ 10 % up o 140 m
Scan a e (selec able)
up o 400 lines/sec
Accu acy
8 mm, 1σ @ 50 m ange
P ecision
5 mm, 1σ @ 50 m ange
IMU/GNSS
Absolu e posi ion accu acy
0.02–0.05 m, 1σ
Roll and pi ch accu acy
0.005°, 1σ
Yaw (heading) accu acy
0.015°, 1σ
VMX-450-CS6
Resolu ion
5 Mpx
Pixel size
3.45 μm
Senso size
2452 × 2056 px
Nominal ocal leng h
5 mm
Ladybug5
Resolu ion
30 Mpx ( 5 Mpx × 6 senso s)
Pixel size
3.45 μm
Senso size
2048 × 2448 px
Nominal ocal leng h
4.4 mm
6 h Wo ld Mul idisciplina y Ea h Sciences Symposium
IOP Con . Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science 609 (2020) 012091
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
3
RIEGL de ines he accu acy in da ashee [7] as a deg ee o con o mi y o measu ed quan i y o i s
ue alue in he VQ-450 sec ion o able 1. The p ecision RIEGL de ines in da ashee [7] as epea abili y
( he deg ee o which u he measu emen s show he same esul ). Values in he IMU/GNSS sec ion o
able 1 a e alid i he ollowing condi ions a e ul illed: no GNSS ou ages, DMI op ion, and pos -
p ocessed using base s a ion da a. The came a calib a ion pa ame e s a e p o ided by he manu ac u e .
Ex e io o ien a ion pa ame e s (posi ions and o a ions o he came as) can be compu ed by RIEGL
so wa e in pos -p ocessing. The came a da a (digi al came a images) can be expo ed in JPEG o ma .
Op ionally, index iles con aining a imes amp, posi ion, and o ien a ion can also be c ea ed o each
image. The images can be expo ed undis o ed ( adial and angen ial dis o ions a e emo ed) [8].
Figu e 1. RIEGL VMX-450 con igu a ion
3. Tes poin ield
Ou es ing is based on he analysis o he di e ences be ween he coo dina es o he poin s de e mined
om he MMS da a and de e mined by a signi ican ly mo e accu a e me hod. Iden i iabili y o hese
poin s is an impo an p ope y o esul ing accu acy. We can dis inguish wo ypes o poin
iden i iabili y o ou pu poses: poin iden i iabili y in eal-wo ld and poin iden i iabili y in cap u ed
da a (poin clouds, images). Resul ing poin coo dina es e o consis s o he iden i ica ion e o and he
e o o he used coo dina e de e mina ion me hod. Fo example, he e o o a poin de e mined by a
o al s a ion is a ec ed by a poin iden i ica ion e o in he eal wo ld. The e o o a poin measu ed
om a poin cloud is a ec ed by a poin iden i ica ion e o in a poin cloud.
In his pape , we ocus on he e o s o he used me hods. The i s s ep is minimizing he impac o
iden i ica ion e o s, he e o e i was decided o signal he es poin s by a ge s. The signaliza ion by
a ge s elimina es he e o o ambiguous iden i iabili y o some na u al poin s. I was necessa y o c ea e
a es poin s ield ha will ha e sa is ac o y accu acy cha ac e is ics o he needs o MMS accu acy
es ing. The coun o poin s mus be su icien o ensu e he eliabili y o he esul s. The AdMaS
Resea ch Cen e complex was chosen due o he easy a ailabili y and long- e m sus ainabili y o he
a ge s. 214 poin s we e es ablished in he AdMaS cen e, which we e signalized and s abilized using
checke boa d a ge s. Ho izon al a ge s (119) we e ma ked by whi e colo on asphal oadways ( igu e
2). The e ical a ge s (95) we e made om a black ma aluminum shee , which was supplemen ed
wi h a e lec i e oil ( igu e 2). Ve ical a ge s we e placed on buildings, e ical a ic signs, conc e e
pilla s and o he sui able e ical s uc u es. The a ge s on he buildings we e placed in wo heigh le els
abo e he g ound: 2 m, 10 m.
6 h Wo ld Mul idisciplina y Ea h Sciences Symposium
IOP Con . Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science 609 (2020) 012091
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
4
Figu e 2. Checke boa d a ge s
The geode ic ne wo k and he es poin ield we e measu ed wi h high accu acy. T imble R8s GNSS
sys em and T imble S8 HP o al s a ion we e used. Fi s ly, a pu pose-buil geode ic ne wo k was c ea ed.
Secondly, es ield poin s we e de e mined. The coo dina es o he es ield poin s we e calcula ed by
he geode ic ne wo k leas squa es adjus men wi h a combina ion o GNSS and e es ial
measu emen s. The Eu opean Te es ial Re e ence Sys em 89 (ETRS89) and Eu opean Te es ial
Re e ence F ame 2000 (ETRF2000) we e used [9]. The minimum-cons ained ne wo k adjus men was
used o compu ing o geode ic ne wo k. Inpu da a in adjus men was pola coo dina es measu ed by
he o al s a ion and coo dina es o ou poin s de e mined by he s a ic GNSS me hod. The cons ained
ne wo k adjus men was used o compu ing o es ield a ached o ixed poin s ( he geode ic ne wo k).
The o e all accu acy o he es ield de e mined by adjus men can be exp essed as he es ima e o he
3D s anda d de ia ion sX,Y,Z = 2 mm.
4. MMS da a acquisi ion and p ocessing
MMS da a we e acqui ed by wo ehicle passes (in bo h di ec ions) 750 m long a a speed o 20 km/h.
Lase da a we e acqui ed a a equency o 1.1 MHz. Came a da a we e egis e ed e e y 1.5 m. The
MMS ajec o y was calcula ed using Applanix POSPac. The esul s o he GNSS Pos P ocessing
Kinema ic me hod we e e ined and smoo hed by a o wa d-backwa d Kalman il e using IMU and
DMI da a.
The p ocessing o MLS da a was pe o med in RIEGL RiPROCESS. RiPROCESS p ocessing
consis s o da a con e sion, poin clouds gene a ion, and ajec o y adjus men . In he i s s age, a poin
clouds we e c ea ed based on he POSPac ajec o y. Fu he mo e, con ol poin s and check poin s in
he poin cloud we e manually iden i ied. Mo e p ecise ajec o y was p ocessed using he
RiPRECISION module based on he co espondences be ween he poin clouds and he con ol poin s.
The esul ing poin cloud consis s o wo pa ial poin clouds co esponding o wo ehicle passes. The
esul ing poin cloud con ains mo e han 247,000,000 poin s wi h a densi y o a ound 4 mm. The wo
pa ial poin clouds con ain a ound 123,500,000 poin s wi h a densi y o a ound 8 mm.
The came a da a (ex e io o ien a ion pa ame e s and undis o ed images) we e expo ed by
RiPROCESS. These da a we e p ocessed in he Ben ley Con ex Cap u e so wa e. A o al o 3,872
images was p ocessed. Fi s ly, au oma ic keypoin ex ac ion, au oma ic ie poin ma ching, and bundle
adjus men we e pe o med. Secondly, he con ol poin s we e ma ked manually. Thi dly, he check
poin s we e ma ked manually [10]. The basic pa ame e s o pho og amme ic p ocessing a e in able 2.

6 h Wo ld Mul idisciplina y Ea h Sciences Symposium
IOP Con . Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science 609 (2020) 012091
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
5
Table 2. O e iew o Con ex Cap u e p ocessing pa ame e s.
Pa ame e name
Pa ame e alue
Coun o pho os
3872
Coun o ie poin s
490794
Median o ie poin s pe pho o
412
Rep ojec ion e o (RMS)
0.70 px
Fil e ing and cloud di e ences we e pe o med in CloudCompa e so wa e 2.10. The 2.5D olume
unc ion was used o calcula e cloud di e ences a he 5 × 5 cm g id nodes. Es ima ions o di e ences
be ween wo clouds, ha we e p ojec ed o he ho izon al plane in case o he oad sub-clouds, and o
he acade plane in case o he acade sub-clouds, we e pe o med.
5. Accu acy e alua ion me hodology
Tes ield poin s and poin clouds we e ans o med in o a local opocen ic sys em Eas , No h, Up
(E, N, U) o easie in e p e a ion. Con ol poin s we e no used as check poin s o ensu e independen
accu acy e alua ion. The coo dina es o poin s de e mined by geode ic me hod a e signi ican ly mo e
accu a e hen coo dina es de e mined om MMS da a. The e o e, we can deal wi h coo dina es Ei, Ni, Ui
de e mined by a geode ic me hod as ue alues and deal wi h di e ences (δE, δN, δU) on check poin s
as ue e o s:
𝛿𝐸𝑖=𝐸𝑖−𝐸
𝑖, 𝛿𝑁𝑖=𝑁𝑖−𝑁
𝑖, 𝛿𝑈𝑖=𝑈𝑖−𝑈
𝑖 , (1)
whe e Ẽi, Ñi, Ũi deno e coo dina es de e mined om MMS da a. I we compa e pai s o he same
accu acy, we ha e o wo k wi h he hal alues o he di e ences. The 3D di e ences a e compu ed as:
𝛿3𝐷𝑖=√𝛿𝐸𝑖
2+𝛿𝑁𝑖
2+𝛿𝑈𝑖
2 . (2)
The s anda d de ia ions a e es ima ed as:
𝑠𝐸=√∑𝛿𝐸𝑖
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑛, 𝑠𝑁=√∑𝛿𝑁𝑖
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑛, 𝑠𝑈=√∑𝛿𝑈𝑖
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑛,𝑠3𝐷 =√∑𝛿3𝐷𝑖
𝑛
𝑖=1𝑛 , (3)
whe e n is coun o di e ences (coun o check poin s). Su aces o cons an p obabili y densi y
co espond o he e o s (δE, δN, δU) o which:
[𝛿𝐸 𝛿𝑁 𝛿𝑈] 𝐶𝑥
−1 [𝛿𝐸 𝛿𝑁 𝛿𝑈]𝑇=𝑡2, (4)
whe e Cx is 3 × 3 a iance-co a iance ma ix, and is a size pa ame e [11]. The con idence ellipsoid
can be exp essed as:
𝛿𝐸
2
𝑠𝐸
2+𝛿𝑁
2
𝑠𝑁
2+𝛿𝑈
2
𝑠𝑈
2=𝑡2, (5)
The semi-p incipal axes a, b, and c o he con idence ellipsoid can be exp essed as a = ∙ sE, b = ∙ sN,
c = ∙ sU. The e o dis ibu ion p obabili y depends on he size pa ame e . The olume o he ellipsoid
equals con idence le el 1 - α. By changing in equa ions (4), and (5), he olume and wi h i he
con idence le el is changed. Fo = 1 he ellipsoid is called he s anda d con idence ellipsoid. The
con idence le el o his ellipsoid is 1 - α = 19.1 %. The p obabili y ha he e o will lie inside his
ellipsoid is 19.1 % [11].
6 h Wo ld Mul idisciplina y Ea h Sciences Symposium
IOP Con . Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science 609 (2020) 012091
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
6
An impo an indica o o accu acy is he occu ence o g oss e o s (ou lie s). The s a is ical me hods
o esul s analysis desc ibed in ISO 5725-2 [12] s anda d can be used. I he es s a is ic in “nume ical
ou lie es ” a e less han o equal o i s 5% c i ical alue (α = 5 %), he i em es ed is accep ed as co ec .
I he es s a is ic is g ea e han i s 5% c i ical alue (α = 5 %) and less han o equal o i s 1% c i ical
alue (α = 1 %), he i em es ed is called a s aggle . I he es s a is ic is g ea e han i s 1% c i ical
alue (α = 1 %), he i em is called a s a is ical ou lie [12].
The size pa ame e o con idence ellipsoid o 1 – α = 95 % p obabili y ha he e o lie inside he
ellipsoid is = 2.8, and o 1 – α = 99 % p obabili y is = 3.4. The poin s wi h e o s (δE, δN, δU) ha lie
inside 95% con idence ellipsoid (Z95%) a e accep ed. The poin s wi h e o s (δE, δN, δU) ha lie ou side
95% con idence ellipsoid (Z95%) and inside o on 99% con idence ellipsoid (Z99%) a e called s aggle s.
The poin s wi h e o s (δE, δN, δU) ha lie ou side 99% con idence ellipsoid (Z99%) a e called ou lie s.
This es can be simpli ied using he con idence sphe e ins ead o he ellipsoid. The 3D e o s ha
mee he condi ion δ3D ≤ 2.8 ∙ s3D a e accep ed. The 3D e o s ha mee he condi ion
2.8 ∙ s3D < δ3D ≤ 3.4 ∙ s3D a e called s aggle s. The 3D e o s ha mee he condi ion δ3D ≥ 3.4 ∙ s3D a e
called ou lie s.
6. Resul s
The accu acy o MLS and mobile pho og amme y da a was es ed based on he di e ences be ween
he coo dina es o he poin s de e mined om he MMS da a and de e mined by be o e men ioned high
p ecise measu emen . The esul ing coo dina es om pho og amme ic da a we e de e mined by manual
de ec ion o a ge s in he images. The o e iew o con ol poin s and check poin s loca ion is shown in
igu e 3. The esul s o he accu acy e alua ion a check poin s a e desc ibed in able 3.
The esul s o he ela i e accu acy e alua ion om wo MMS ehicle passes a e desc ibed in able 4.
Two di e en MLS da a se s we e e alua ed, he i s da a se con ains poin s on oads (see column 2 in
able 4 and igu e 4), he second da a se on he acade (see column 3 in able 4 and igu e 5 le ). We also
compa ed au oma ic poin cloud p oduc ion om pho og amme y da a p ocessed in Ben ley
Con ex Cap u e o he poin cloud om lase scanning. The MLS da a has been used as a e e ence
because i is signi ican ly mo e accu a e as men ioned be o e. This compa ison was done only on he
second da a se on he acade (see column 4 in able 4 and igu e 5 igh ). These analyses a e based on
he di e ences in he poin clouds compu ed in CloudCompa e 2.10.
Figu e 3. O e iew con ol poin s and check poin s loca ion
6 h Wo ld Mul idisciplina y Ea h Sciences Symposium
IOP Con . Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science 609 (2020) 012091
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
7
Table 3. Accu acy e alua ion a check poin s
MOBILE LASER SCANNING
MOBILE PHOTOGRAMMETRY
E
N
U
3D
E
N
U
3D
Coun o con ol poin s
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
Coun o check poin s
158
158
158
158
96
96
96
96
Maximum absolu e de ia ion
0.037
0.025
0.044
0.050
0.095
0.216
0.124
0.230
S anda d de ia ion
0.011
0.009
0.009
0.017
0.031
0.045
0.027
0.061
Table 4. Rela i e accu acy e alua ion o poin clouds
Two passes MLS
oads
Two passes MLS
acade
MLS × pho og amme y
acade
Coun o g id poin s
83039
14510
10120
Maximum absolu e de ia ion
0.030
0.028
0.249
S anda d de ia ion
0.006
0.008
0.164
Figu e 4. Visualiza ion o he di e ences be ween he wo passes o MLS – oads
Figu e 5. Visualiza ion o he di e ences be ween he wo passes o MLS on he acade (le ),
be ween MLS and mobile pho og amme y on he acade ( igh )
6 h Wo ld Mul idisciplina y Ea h Sciences Symposium
IOP Con . Se ies: Ea h and En i onmen al Science 609 (2020) 012091
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091
8
The e o dis ibu ion on he check poin s is displayed in he his og ams in igu es 6, 7. The esul s
o he 3D e o es o ou lie s and s aggle s on he check poin s using Z95% and Z99% con idence sphe es
a e shown in able 5, and con idence ellipsoids in able 6 and igu e 8.
Table 5. The esul s o he ou lie s and s aggle s es on check poin s using con idence sphe e
MOBILE LASER
SCANNING
MOBILE
PHOTOGRAMMETRY
δ3D ≤ Z95%
157
92
Z95% < δ3D ≤ Z99%
1
2
δ3D > Z99%
0
2
Table 6. The esul s o he ou lie s and s aggle s es on check poin s using con idence ellipsoids
MOBILE LASER
SCANNING
MOBILE
PHOTOGRAMMETRY
(δE, δN, δU) ≤ Z95%
142
88
Z95% < (δE, δN, δU) ≤ Z99%
13
4
(δE, δN, δU) > Z99%
3
4
Figu e 6. His og ams o mobile lase scanning e o s on check poin s
Figu e 7. His og ams o mobile pho og amme y e o s on check poin s