scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Does sacking a coach really help? Evidence from a Difference-in-Differences approach

Abstract

This project looks to evaluate if football clubs should or should not change their coach in order to improve their performance in the national league. For this analysis I selected, three of the most important European football leagues, La Liga (Spain), Serie A (Italy) and Premier League (England). The data used in this project was taken from the transfermarkt website, a large football platform. The data period is from season 2005-06 to season 2019-20 and has information about individual games results and squad value by player. The steps before the analysis were a data cleaning and consolidation of the information, creation of new features as a performance measure and selection of cases of interest for this analysis based on club and coach profile. Numeric variables were standardized to be on the same scale and make different seasons comparable. A K-means was applied to identify clubs according to their investments which has a proportional correlation with performance. Finally, a difference in differences analysis was applied to evaluate if a club would obtain a performance gain if they decided to sack their coach between game twelve and twenty-six of the season after a poor performance in consideration to squad price. As a general conclusion, it is possible to consider that on average the clubs in the treatment group and comparison group recover their performance after a period of underperforming, but the recovery of the clubs that sack their coach is lower compared with the clubs that keep them.

Read accessible full text

Does sacking a coach really help? Evidence from a Difference-in-Differences approach

Author: Fabrício, Gustavo de Souza Machado
Year: 2022
Source: https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/136015/1/TCDMAA0148.pdf
i
Does sacking a coach eally
help? E idence om a
Di e ence-in-Di e ences
app oach
Gus a o de Souza Machado Fab ício
Disse a ion p esen ed as pa ial
equi emen o ob aining he mas e ’s
deg ee in Ad anced Analy ics
iii
NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School
Ins i u o Supe io de Es a ís ica e Ges ão de In o mação
Uni e sidade No a de Lisboa
Does sacking a coach eally help? E idence om a
Di e ence-in-Di e ences app oach
By
Gus a o de Souza Machado Fab ício
This p ojec is p esen ed as pa ial equi emen o ob aining he mas e ’s
deg ee in Da a Science and Ad anced Analy ics
Supe iso : B uno Damásio
No embe 2021
i
Acknowledgemen s
I would like o exp ess my g a i ude o my supe iso , p o esso B uno Damásio who
ga e me all he suppo and a en ion du ing he esea ch and analysis, p o iding
ma e ials, his ime o discuss abou he me hods, his pa ience, his ision ha helped me
o make his hesis a eali y.
I am ex emely g a e ul o my pa en s M . Jose Ca los Fab ício and M s. Solange
Fab ício o hei us in me, o he ime and e o in es ed in my educa ion, wi hou
hem none o his would be possible. Also, a special hank you o my li e pa ne
Danielle New on o he pa ience and suppo du ing my mas e ’s.
Finally, my hanks o my mas e ’s iends ha made his jou ney mo e in e es ing han
i al eady was, wi h special men ion o Vic o Gonzalez my pa ne in mos o he
p ojec s du ing he mas e ’s. Thanks o you suppo , and pa ne ship.
To all o you, wi hou whom I would no be who I am and wha I ha e achie ed, Thank
You.
Abs ac
This p ojec looks o e alua e i oo ball clubs should o should no change hei coach
in o de o imp o e hei pe o mance in he na ional league. Fo his analysis I selec ed,
h ee o he mos impo an Eu opean oo ball leagues, La Liga (Spain), Se ie A (I aly)
and P emie League (England).
The da a used in his p ojec was aken om he ans e ma k websi e, a la ge oo ball
pla o m. The da a pe iod is om season 2005-06 o season 2019-20 and has in o ma ion
abou indi idual games esul s and squad alue by playe .
The s eps be o e he analysis we e a da a cleaning and consolida ion o he in o ma ion,
c ea ion o new ea u es as a pe o mance measu e and selec ion o cases o in e es o
his analysis based on club and coach p o ile. Nume ic a iables we e s anda dized o
be on he same scale and make di e en seasons compa able. A K-means was applied
o iden i y clubs acco ding o hei in es men s which has a p opo ional co ela ion
wi h pe o mance.
Finally, a di e ence in di e ences analysis was applied o e alua e i a club would
ob ain a pe o mance gain i hey decided o sack hei coach be ween game wel e and
wen y-six o he season a e a poo pe o mance in conside a ion o squad p ice.
As a gene al conclusion, i is possible o conside ha on a e age he clubs in he
ea men g oup and compa ison g oup eco e hei pe o mance a e a pe iod o
unde pe o ming, bu he eco e y o he clubs ha sack hei coach is lowe compa ed
wi h he clubs ha keep hem.
Keywo ds
Di e ence in Di e ences; S a is ics; Foo ball; Da a Sc aping; Clus e ing
i
Index
1. In oduc ion ............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Thesis Objec i e .............................................................................................. 2
2. Li e a u e Re iew .................................................................................................... 2
3. Theo e ical backg ound ........................................................................................... 4
3.1 K-Means ........................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Backwa d S epwise .......................................................................................... 5
3.3 Di e ences in Di e ences ............................................................................... 5
3.3.1 No a ion and modelling ............................................................................ 6
3.3.2 Unbiased es ima o assump ions .............................................................. 7
4. Me hodology ........................................................................................................... 8
4.1 Da a Sc aping ................................................................................................... 8
4.2 Da a p epa a ion ............................................................................................... 9
4.3 Clubs’ segmen a ion ...................................................................................... 12
4.4 Fil e ing cases o in e es and da a analysis ................................................... 15
4.5 Di e ence in di e ences model..................................................................... 17
5. Resul P esen a ion ................................................................................................ 18
5.1 Se ie A ........................................................................................................ 18
5.2 La Liga ....................................................................................................... 19
5.3 P emie League .......................................................................................... 20
5.4 Resul s O e iew ........................................................................................... 21
6. Conclusion and u u e wo k .................................................................................. 22
7. Limi a ions ............................................................................................................ 23
8. Re e ences ............................................................................................................. 24
9. Appendix ............................................................................................................... 26

ii
Lis o Figu es
Figu e 1 - Di e ence in di e ences es ima ion ............................................................................ 6
Figu e 2 - Sc apping and da a p epa a ion .................................................................................. 9
Figu e 3- A e age numbe o clubs by Fi s coach quan i y o games. .................................... 10
Figu e 4 - Pe cen age o sacked coaches in he inal da a se by league and clus e . ................ 16
Figu e 5 - Boxplo – Pe o mance dis ibu ion o Sé ie A by ime and Clus e ...................... 16
Figu e 6 - Boxplo – Pe o mance dis ibu ion o La Liga by ime and Clus e ...................... 17
Figu e 7 - Boxplo – Pe o mance dis ibu ion o P emie League by ime and Clus e . ........ 17
iii
Lis o Tables
Table 1- Va iables o K-means segmen a ion. ......................................................................... 13
Table 2 - K-means segmen a ion o Sé ie A ............................................................................ 13
Table 3 - K-means segmen a ion o La Liga............................................................................ 13
Table 4 - K-means segmen a ion o P emie League ............................................................... 13
Table 5 - Pe o mance o ea ed g oup in 𝑡0 by League and Clus e . ..................................... 14
Table 6 - Quan i y o obse a ions by league, clus e and ea ed ............................................ 15
Table 7- DiD Reg ession Resul s o Se ie A. .......................................................................... 18
Table 8 - DiD Reg ession Resul s o La Liga .......................................................................... 19
Table 9 - DiD Reg ession Resul s o P emie League ............................................................. 20
Table 10 - Ma ch da a se example ............................................................................................ 26
Table 11 - Playe s da a se example .......................................................................................... 26
Table 12 - Coach consolida ion da a se .................................................................................... 26
ix
Lis o abb e ia ions and ac onyms
DiD Di e ence in Di e ences
Pe o mance To al poin s won di ided by o al possible poin s
Compa ison G oup G oup o obse a ions wi hou in e en ion / ea men
T ea men G oup G oup o obse a ions ha su e ed in e en ion
Wa ning Pe o mance A pe o mance pe cen age ha clubs usually s a s o
sack hei coach.
1
1. In oduc ion
In ecen decades, in collec i e spo s, he impo ance o he coach has been highligh ed.
The coach is he pe son who o e sees aining and eam o ma ion, p epa ing i o a
good pe o mance o ob ain posi i e esul s. The coach is an expe in echnical and
ac ical di ec ion and in he playe ’s psychological and physical de elopmen . In
oo ball his is no di e en , pa o a success ul season o a oo ball club in ol es hi ing
he ideal coach o manage he eam, o ming he bes squad, and equen ly indica ing
playe s o hi e.
In oo ball his o y we ha e a ew examples o coaches ha s ayed o decades a he
same club, such as Guy Roux, who s ayed o o y- ou yea s (1961 - 2005) in cha ge
o Auxe e-FRA, leading he club om he hi d di ision o he i le o F ench League
in 1995. In England, he mos success ul manage in he oo ball his o y, Alex Fe guson,
led Manches e Uni ed o wen y-se en yea s (1986 - 2013) winning a o al o o y-
nine i les.
Bu he his o y has mo e cases o clubs sacking hei coaches du ing he season han
examples o longe i y. Fo example, in he I alian i s di ision du ing he las i e
seasons (2015-16 – 2019-20) an a e age o wel e clubs pe season kep hei coaches
o he du a ion o he season and in he same pe iod in ele en occasions clubs he e
we e h ee o mo e coaches du ing he same season.
When a club decides o sack i s coach be o e he end o hei con ac i causes some
incon eniences. One o hem is a e mina ion ine, ha depends on he con ac be ween
bo h pa ies bu when we alk abou he iches leagues in he wo ld his usually in ol es
a la ge amoun o money. As an example, when José Mou inho was sacked om
To enham in Ap il 2021, he had a con ac un il he end o he season 2022-23, and as
a consequence o his b each o con ac To enham had o pay a se e ance package o
a ound i een million pounds o Mou inho acco ding o he websi e oo ball.london
[13].
This p ojec will analyse da a om he op h ee leagues in Eu ope, La Liga – Spain,
Se ie A – I aly and P emie League - England be ween seasons 2005-06 and 2019-20.
All leagues ha e almos he same s uc u e. The en i e season uns om Augus h ough
o May and he league consis s o wen y clubs playing agains each o he bo h a home
8
4. Me hodology
This chap e ocuses on explaining in dep h he whole analysis p ocess o answe he
p oposed ques ions in his hesis, s a ing om da a sc aping, da a p epa a ion, club’s
segmen a ion, il e cases o in e es , desc ip i e analysis and DiD model applica ion.
4.1 Da a Sc aping
The da a used in his analysis was sc aped om he web si e ans e ma k .co.uk/
T ans e ma k o e s he wo ld's la ges oo ball da abase wi h all in o ma ion on
playe s, clubs, and compe i ions as well as one o he la ges oo ball communi ies and
playing a eas o anyone who wan s o sha e and exchange ideas abou oo ball. An
o e iew o playe ma ke alues in addi ion o news, s a is ics, consul an in o ma ion
and an insigh s. The pla o m was ounded in May 2000 by Ma hias Seidel.
The sc aping p ocess was made wi h R using he lib a y es , who e icien ly sc aped
he da a om seasons 2005-06 o 2019-2020 o he English, Spanish and I alian i s
di ision leagues. Fo each league he e was a wo-sc ap p ocess, one o he game esul s
and one o playe ’s in o ma ion’s.
The game esul s da a consis s o in o ma ion such as da e o he ma ch, ime, home
eam and away eam, hei posi ion on he league able, coach and o ma ion and
a endance and esul . Each line ep esen s one game, an example o his able is
a ailable in he appendix a able 10. This in o ma ion is undamen al o iden i y when
a club sacked a coach du ing he season and calcula e he pe o mance.
The playe ’s in o ma ion consis s o he playe s name, club, age, posi ion, ma ke alue,
bes oo , and heigh . Each line ep esen s one playe du ing a speci ic season. This
in o ma ion will be help ul o iden i y club pe o mance expec a ions based on he squad
alue and o c ea e independen a iables o explain pe o mance. An example o his
able is a ailable in he appendix a able 11.
The diag am bellow ep esen s he p ocess o sc apping he da a om ans e ma k
using R, da a cleaning and ans o ma ion o build he da a ables o each league in his
hesis.

9
Figu e 2 - Sc apping and da a p epa a ion
S ep 1: Using he lib a y es , access he ans e ma k web si e in a speci ic URL o
access he in o ma ion o in e es om wo main URL s uc u es, one o ma ches
in o ma ion ha was composed by ou a iables ha changes acco ding wi h club,
season, and league. The second was o ex ac he playe s in o ma ion and was
composed by ee a iables as season and wo ela ed o he club.
S ep 2: S o e ha in o ma ion in o lis s, whe e each lis ep esen s one speci ic
in o ma ion e.g. he sco e, name o he club playing home, name o he club playing
away.
S ep 3: Using he lib a y idy clean a iable ou o he o ma and ans o ming lis s
in o da a ables, as men ioned be o e, one o ma ches and o he o playe s.
S ep 4: Expo hose da a ables o x ile ha going o be used on Py hon o he analysis
4.2 Da a p epa a ion
This s ep is essen ial o he p ojec , has all consolida ions, alida ions and c i e ia
de ini ions we e made o be used in he analysis. The idea is o agg ega e he in o ma ion
by Season - Club – Manage o calcula e pe o mance, e alua e he cases o in e es and
de ine he h ee a iables o apply DiD eg ession, T ea ed, Time and T ea ed x Time.
As desc ibed be o e, in he able each line ep esen s a game o a speci ic club, ha
agg ega ion was made o c ea e a able wi h club, season, coach, numbe o games, da e
o i s game and las game o he coach. As an example, he able 12 in he appendix,
10
shows ha Ala es had h ee coaches du ing he season 2005-2006. Tha means each line
ep esen s a wo k pe iod o a coach in a club du ing a speci ic season.
F om he numbe o games in he agg ega e able, i is iden i ied which coach was
sacked o no du ing he season and o how long hey managed he club. The c i e ia
a e, i he coach had a wo k pe iod o hi y- ou games o mo e, i is conside ed ha he
s ayed o he whole season, be ween wen y-se en and hi y- h ee games, he coach
s ayed o mo e han hal o he season, be ween wel e and wen y-six games he s ayed
o hal o he season and less han wel e games he s ayed o less han hal o he
season.
Acco ding o his in o ma ion, each coach's wo k pe iod will be di ided in o wo
di e en g oups, he ones whose wo k pe iod las ed a leas hi y- ou games, hese
obse a ions will ep esen he compa ison g oup, which means obse a ions wi hou
ea men du ing he season, and he wo k pe iod ha was in e up ed du ing he season
o s a ed in some poin a e he s a o he season, will be ep esen ing he ea ed
g oup, obse a ions ha su e ed an in e en ion du ing he season.
Figu e 3- A e age numbe o clubs by Fi s coach quan i y o games.
No e: Figu e 3 ep esen s he a e age numbe o clubs o e he i een seasons ha kep
hei coach by ou di e en pe iods o ime and league.
As we can see in igu e 2, du ing a season in Se ie A, only ele en clubs on a e age will
main ain hei coach un il he end o he season, and se en clubs on a e age will sack
11
hei couch hal way h ough he season o be o e. Be ween he h ee leagues, I aly has
he highes numbe o changes.
E alua ing he g oup wi h ea men , he ideal homogeneous beha iou o all clubs wi h
ea men would be, club A du ing season one had coach X o he i s nine een games
and hen coach Y o he las nine een games, whe e coach X ep esen s 𝑡 and coach Y
ep esen s 𝑡. Bu in gene al, his does no happen, he da a base has se e al cases o
clubs wi h mo e han wo coaches du ing he same season by consequence coaches wi h
less han en games in 𝑡 which will be conside ed a low numbe o games o e alua e
pe o mance. To make a ai e alua ion, his hesis will only conside cases whe e he
coach ha s a ed he season (𝑡) had a leas be ween wel e and wen y-six games, o
he cases ha he club had wo o mo e coaches a e he i s coach, i will be conside ed
one single wo k pe iod, in o he wo ds, i will e alua e he pe o mance o he coach
ha s a ed he season and he pe o mance o he club a e he coach was sacked.
The compa ison g oup also need o be spli in 𝑡 and 𝑡, in o de o compa e pe o mance
in wo di e en momen s, in his hesis o he coaches who s ayed he en i e season his
b eak will be he game wi h lowes cumula i e pe o mance be ween i h and wen y-
hi d game. Wi h hese c i e ia he season will be di ided in he mos c i ical momen
ha is a simila condi ion o wha happens wi h he ea ed g oup.
The coach pe o mance is calcula ed di iding he o al poin s won by o al possible
poin s, ha means i he coach won wen y-one poin s in ou een games, his o al
possible poin s will be ou een imes h ee equals o o y- wo, so his pe o mance is
wen y-one di ided by o y- wo equals o i y pe cen . This me ic will be he ou come
o he model.
The o he da a se ha will be used in his p ojec is ela ed o squad, each line has
in o ma ion abou one playe in a speci ic season and club like age, es ima ed alue and
posi ion. This da a se will be consolida ed by season and club, wi h in o ma ion o o al,
a e age and highes alue by playe ’s posi ion, hose new ea u es will be used as
independen a iables o explain pe o mance and c ea e clus e o clubs/ season.
Analysing he e olu ion o he es ima ed ma ke alue o he playe season o e season
we no ice ha his alue has been ising o e ime, compa ing he a e age es ima ed
alue o a playe in season 2005-2006 agains season 2019-2020 we see Se ie A wi h a
jump om 2.36M o 6.44M, wi h mo e han 170% g ow h, La Liga om 3.02M o
12
7.72M wi h 153% g ow h and P emie e League om 3.7M o 10.73M wi h 189%
g ow h. In his scena io he p ice a iables by posi ion would no be e ec i e o p edic
pe o mance once pe o mance is a ixed ange be ween ze o and one and he p ice ha e
been g owing season o e season, he co ela ion be ween p ice and pe o mance would
depend on he yea .
A solu ion o his issue was, once he da a was consolida ed, s anda dise he alues o
each season indi idually, in his way i is possible o ha e he same scale o e he
seasons and exp ess he di e ence be ween clubs inside he season. The s anda dise
echnique was he s anda d sco e o Z - Sco e scale, his echnique is be e explained in
he Theo e ical Backg ound. Wi h his ans o ma ion he co ela ion be ween
pe o mance and o al alue o he squad s anda dized is 0.69 o Se ie A, 0.74 o
P emie League and 0.78 o La Liga, as expec ed a mo e aluable squad ends o ha e
be e esul s.
4.3 Clubs’ segmen a ion
As was commen ed be o e, a mo e aluable squad ends o ha e be e esul s, and
consequen ly i implies g ea e p essu e o coaches o ha e be e esul s. Nobody
expec s ha SPAL wi h an es ima ed squad alue o nine y-se en million and ou
hund ed housand eu os would ha e he same pe o mance o Ju en us wi h a squad
alue nine imes highe in season 2018-19. In o he wo ds, i Massimiliano Alleg i
(Ju en us coach) had he same pe o mance o Leona do Semplici (SPAL coach) o
37% p obably he would be sacked du ing he season, whe eas SPAL kep Semplici un il
he end o he season.
This segmen a ion is o he pu pose o di iding clubs in o clus e s acco ding o hei
squad alue and a e , iden i ying he c i ical pe cen age o pe o mance o he clubs-
season by clus e . The ou mos co ela ed a iables wi h pe o mance will be used o
pe o m a K-means segmen a ion. The K-means was applied o h ee hund ed
obse a ions ( wen y clubs pe season, imes i een seasons.) The Elbow g aph was
used o de e mine he numbe o clus e s, minimizing he a iance inside he g oups and
maximizing he a iance be ween g oup in o de o ha e he mos e icien numbe o
clus e .
13
Table 1- Va iables o K-means segmen a ion.
The segmen a ion gene a ed he ollowing esul s:
Table 2 - K-means segmen a ion o Sé ie A
As showed in he p e ious able, in Sé ie A Clus e 1 has clubs wi h low in es men s
e.g. B escia, Pesca a and T e iso. Clus e 3 has clubs wi h medium in es men s e.g.
Udinese, Fio en ina, and To ino. Clus e s 0 and 2 Clubs wi h high in es men s e.g
Ju en us, AC Milan, and In e . Those wo clus e s ha e almos he same clubs in
di e en seasons, o ha eason Clus e 2 will be inco po a ed o Clus e 0. Tha
happens because in some seasons hose clubs had a la ge di e ence o in es men s
compa e o he o he s.
Table 3 - K-means segmen a ion o La Liga.
Clus e 0 has clubs wi h low in es men e.g. Las Palmas, Le an e, Maio ca and
Numância. Clus e 2 has clubs wi h medium in es men e.g. Se ilha, Valencia and
Villa eal. Clus e 1 has clubs wi h high in es men and is composed jus wi h
Ba celona, Real Mad id, and A le ico Mad id in some seasons.
Table 4 - K-means segmen a ion o P emie League
League
Se ie A To a Value Mean Value Mean Value De ence To al Value A ack
LA Liga Mean Value To a Value Mean Value A ack Max Value De ence
P emie League To a Value Mean Value To al Value De ence Mean Value A ack
K-Means Va iables - S anda dized
Clus e To a Value Mean Value To al Value De ence Mean Value A ack N
03,05 2,85 2,63 2,83 43
10,38 0,39 0,36 0,42 156
24,40 4,42 4,40 4,26 35
31,42 1,30 1,22 1,37 66
Clus e To a Value Mean Value Max Value De ence Mean Value A ack N
0 0,29 0,32 0,43 0,26 202
1 4,71 4,65 4,63 4,45 32
2 1,56 1,58 1,80 1,43 66
Clus e To a Value Mean Value To al Value De ence Mean Value A ack N
01,24 1,33 1,17 1,17 64
14,38 4,24 4,43 4,25 44
20,41 0,42 0,46 0,41 152
33,03 2,69 2,71 2,73 40

14
The P emie League is he league wi h mo e in e sec ion o clubs be ween clus e s, as
an example Manches e Ci y appea s in all clus e s, he eason is he g ow h o inancial
po en ial wi h in es men s o e he yea s. Clus e 2, clubs wi h low in es men s e.g.
Bi mingham, She ield Uni ed and Wes B om. Clus e 0, clubs wi h medium
in es men s e.g. Wes Ham, Sou hamp on and Wol e hamp on; and Clus e 1 and 3
wi h clubs wi h high in es men s e.g. Manches e Uni ed, Li e pool and Chelsea. Those
wo clus e s we e g ouped oge he due o he simila i y o he clubs.
The nex s ep is o me ge he clus e in o ma ion wi h he ea ed da ase , in doing ha ,
i is possible o e alua e he wa ning pe o mance pe cen age o each clus e by
analysing he pe o mance o he obse a ions in 𝑡. Once he wa ning pe o mance o
each clus e is known hese alues will be used o selec he obse a ions o be used in
he DiD eg ession. Fo hose coaches whose pe o mance is equal o o below he
wa ning pe o mance in 𝑡 means ha hey we e wi h hei posi ion in isk, so i is
easonable o compa e hem wi h hose who, in he same le el o in es men s we e
sacked.
Table 5 - Pe o mance o ea ed g oup in 𝑡 by League and Clus e .
As was expec ed, he clubs wi h high in es men s, had a highe s anda d o
pe o mance. On able 5 i is possible o no ice ha La Liga has a highe a e age
pe o mance o he ea ed obse a ions when compa ed o he o he leagues, which
explains he di e ence o in es men s be ween he clubs. Jus ou o cu iosi y, be ween
he seasons 2005-06 and 2019-20 only i e di e en clubs inished he league in he op
h ee, and he league had only h ee di e en champions.
Max P 90 Mean Min
High 60% 57% 50% 39% 9
Medium 46% 44% 38% 21% 16
Low 37% 33% 25% 13% 44
High 70% 70% 65% 60% 4
Medium 57% 51% 42% 26% 11
Low 38% 33% 28% 14% 38
High 67% 66% 50% 31% 8
Medium 56% 43% 33% 21% 10
Low 41% 35% 28% 11% 32
Se ie A
P emie
League
La Liga
Pe o mance
Clus e League Q
15
4.4 Fil e ing cases o in e es and da a analysis
Once he ea ed club/season cases a e al eady p epa ed and he pe o mance by segmen
is known, he nex s ep is il e ing he non- ea ed obse a ions in 𝑡 wi h a simila
pe o mance by clus e in he ea ed g oup in 𝑡 in o de o ha e a ai compa ison. Fo
his il e he pe cen ile 90% will be used. Tha means i a non- ea ed club A in season
X o he P emie League ha belongs o clus e medium in es men wi h a pe o mance
equal o lowe o 43% in 𝑡, his obse a ion will be selec ed o he analysis.
In he same example abo e, i would no be ai o compa e a non- ea ed obse a ion
ha ha e 70% pe o mance in 𝑡, because in no mal condi ions his pe o mance le el
is ou side o he pe o mance ange ha clubs use o sack hei coach.
The inal da abase o he analysis is composed by non- ea ed cases, compa ison g oup,
ha pe o mance in 𝑡 by clus e is lowe han pe cen ile 90% o he same clus e in
he ea ed cases plus he ea ed cases, ea men g oup, ha he manage a 𝑡 had
be ween wel e and wen y-six games.
Table 6 - Quan i y o obse a ions by league, clus e and ea ed
The able abo e shows ha in he clus e high he numbe o obse a ions in non-
ea ed is highe han ea ed, indica ing ha clubs wi h high in es men s and
consequen ly high pe o mance, end o keep hei coach when he pe o mance hi s
he wa ning pe cen age. On he o he side, clubs wi h low in es men s a e mo e likely
o change hei coach. A hypo hesis o ha beha iou can be ela ed o he elega ion,
clubs wi h low in es men s and pe o mance bellow he expec a ions ends o igh
agains elega ion and sack a coach expec ing a be e pe o mance is one o he mos
common e ec s. The plo below ep esen s he pe cen age o sacked coaches wi h
pe o mance below he wa ning pe cen age o he clus e .
Se ie A La Liga P emie
League
High Yes 9 4 8
High No 17 10 38
Medium Yes 16 11 10
Medium No 5 16 24
Low Yes 44 42 33
Low No 26 28 49
117 111 162
Q Obse a ions in
To al
Clus e T ea ed
𝑡

16
Figu e 4 - Pe cen age o sacked coaches in he inal da a se by league and clus e .
No e: Figu e 4 ep esen s he pe cen age o sacked coaches in he inal da ase by
League and clus e .
Compa ing leagues Se ie A a e mo e likely o sack hei coach in ela ion o he o he
leagues in e e y clus e . P emie League has he lowes pe cen age wi h 17% o he
clubs in he clus e High alue. Also, can be no ice ha he clubs wi h lowe in es men s
a e mo e likely o sack hei coaches. A possible explana ion is clubs wi h highe
in es men s ends o hi hei pe o mance goals easie in compa ison wi h clubs wi h
lowe in es men s.
The Boxplo below shows he dis ibu ion o pe o mance by ea ed/non- ea ed case
and ime di ided by clus e .
Figu e 5 - Boxplo – Pe o mance dis ibu ion o Sé ie A by ime and Clus e
17
Figu e 6 - Boxplo – Pe o mance dis ibu ion o La Liga by ime and Clus e
Figu e 7 - Boxplo – Pe o mance dis ibu ion o P emie League by ime and
Clus e .
No e: Figu es 5, 6 and 7 ep esen s he dis ibu ion o pe o mance o club/season by
ea ed and compa ison g oup in 𝑡 and 𝑡 by clus e .
By he dis ibu ion abo e, i is easy o no ice ha ime has a big in luence o bo h cases
ea ed and non- ea ed. When a club has a bad s a o he season acco ding o hei
expec a ions and capabili ies, hey end o eco e a e a ce ain poin . Fo e e y league
and clus e , he median is highe in 𝑡, compa ing wi h 𝑡. DiD will help o unde s and
i he e is pe o mance gain by changing he coach.
4.5 Di e ence in di e ences model
A e p epa ing he da a in he p e ious s eps a di e ence in di e ences model was
applied o each league and he ea u e selec ion p ocess was Backwa d S epwise
24
8. Re e ences
[1] D. Bloyce e al.(Decembe 2008), Playing he Game (Plan): A Figu a ional
Analysis o O ganiza ional Change in Spo s De elopmen in EnglandEu opean Spo
Managemen Qua e ly, Vol. 8, No. 4, 359 - 378
[2] By RT, Die enbach T, Kla ne P (2008). Ge ing O ganiza ional Change Righ in
Public Se ices: The Case o Eu opean Highe Educa ion. J Change Manag.
2008;8(1):2 1-35.
[3] Bes e s, Lucas M., Jan C. an Ou s, and Ma in A. an Tuijl. (2016), E ec i eness
o in‐season manage changes in English P emie League oo ball. De Economis 164:
335–56.
[4] González‐Gómez, F., Picazo‐Tadeo, A.J. and Ga cía‐Rubio, M.Á. (2011), The
impac o a mid‐season change o manage on spo ing pe o mance, Spo , Business
and Managemen , Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 28-42.
[5] Ma ínez, J. A. (2012), En enado nue o, ¿ ic o ia segu a? E idencia en
balonces o /Chaning a coach, gua an ee he win? Re is a In e nacional de Medicina y
Ciencias de la Ac i idad Física y el Depo e 12 (48), 663-679.
[6] Da id Ca d & Alan B. K uege (1994), Minimum Wages and Employmen : A
Case S udy o he Fas -Food Indus y in New Je sey and Pennsyl ania; The Ame ican
Economic Re iew, Volume 84, Issue 4 (Sep. 1994), 772-793
[7] Callaway, B., & San ’Anna, P. H. C. (2020), Di e ence-in-di e ences wi h
mul iple ime pe iods. Jou nal o Econome ics.
[8] Book. Ad ances in K-means Clus e ing - A Da a Mining Thinking - Ha dback –
2012.
[9] Desboule s Loann (No embe 2018), A Re iew on Va iable Selec ion in
Reg ession Analysis Econome ics 6(4):45
[10] Book. Impac E alua ion in P ac ice (Second Edi ion) Paul J. Ge le , Sebas ian
Ma inez, Pa ick P emand, Lau a B. Rawlings, and Ch is el M. J. Ve mee sch - 2012
[11] Ande s F ed iksson, Gus a o de Oli ei a (Oc obe 2019), Impac e alua ion using
Di e ence-in-Di e ences RAUSP Managemen Jou nal 54(4):519-532

25
[12] Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Di e ence-in-di e ences wi h a ia ion in ea men
iming. Jou nal o Econome ics
[13] h ps://www. oo ball.london/ o enham-ho spu - c/news/cos -o -sacking-jose-
mou inho-20416106
[14] h ps://www. ans e ma k .co.uk/
26
9. Appendix
Table 10 - Ma ch da a se example
Table 11 - Playe ’s da a se example
Table 12 - Coach consolida ion da a se
Da e HomeTeam HomeTeamPos AwayTeam AwayTeamPos Fo ma ion Manage A endence Resul TeamMa ches Season
01/10/2000 AC Milan 6.0 Vicenza 16.0 3-4-3 Albe o
Zacche oni 46.836 02:00 AC Milan 2000
15/10/2000 Bolonha 17.0 AC Milan 2.0 3-4-3 Albe o
Zacche oni 34.631 02:01 AC Milan 2000
21/10/2000 AC Milan 8.0 Ju en us 2.0 3-4-1-2 Albe o
Zacche oni 81.954 02:02 AC Milan 2000
01/11/2000 AC Pa ma 15.0 AC Milan 8.0 3-4-3 Albe o
Zacche oni 21.572 02:00 AC Milan 2000
05/11/2000 AC Milan 12.0 A alan a 2.0 3-4-1-2 Albe o
Zacche oni 54.641 03:03 AC Milan 2000
Playe Names Posi ion Numbe Bi h Heigh Foo Joined Value Season Team
Diego
Ca alie iDiego
Ca alie i
Gua da-
Redes 28 01/12/1982 (27) 1.89 esque do 01/08/2010 600 mil 2010 Cesana
Alex Teodo aniA.
Teodo ani
Gua da-
Redes
91 21/09/1991 (18) 1.91 di ei o 01/07/2009 200 mil 2010 Cesana
F ancesco
An onioliF.
An onioli
Gua da-
Redes 1 14/09/1969 (40) 1.87 di ei o 07/07/2009 100 mil 2010 Cesana
Alex Calde oniA.
Calde oni
Gua da-
Redes
33 31/05/1976 (34) 1.82 esque do 07/01/2011 100 mil 2010 Cesana
Aldo SimonciniA.
Simoncini
Gua da-
Redes
86 30/08/1986 (23) 1.84 esque do 01/01/2011 100 mil 2010 Cesana
TeamMa ches Season Manage Ma ch_q Fi s Ma ch Las Ma ch
Ala és 2005 Chuchi Cos 18 27/08/2005 08/01/2006
Ala és
2005
Juan Ca los Oli a
5
15/01/2006
12/02/2006
Ala és
2005
Ma io Luna
15
18/02/2006
13/05/2006
Ala és
2016
Mau icio Pelleg ino
38
21/08/2016
20/05/2017
Ala és
2017
Luis Zubeldía
4
18/08/2017
17/09/2017
Page | i