scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Knowledge Management impact in Project Management: Best Practice Model for Project Management

Abstract

This thesis aims to explore the relationship between Knowledge Management and Project Management and their influence on project success. In today’s fast-paced environment, where knowledge is the primary source of competitive advantage, it’s crucial for companies to realize the importance of knowledge management; otherwise, it may result in losing to competitors. The study addresses the need for a structured framework that enhances efficiency and success throughout the project life cycle. The research process involved an extensive literature review and interviews with project management experts, revealing both the strengths and limitations of the proposed framework. The framework consists of three key phases: "Before" for proactive process improvement, "During" for critical project management stages, and "After" for post-project knowledge transfer and evaluation. The interviews highlighted the framework's potential to bridge communication gaps, facilitate knowledge transfer, and improve project success rates. However, challenges were identified, such as the lack of information on the KM-PM intersection and potential resistance to cultural and organizational changes in large organizations. Future research should involve practical testing and validation of the framework in real-world business cases.

Read accessible full text

Knowledge Management impact in Project Management: Best Practice Model for Project Management

Author: Dominguez, Pedro Manuel Fernandes Veloso
Year: 2024
Source: https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/165447/1/TGI2447.pdf
Mas e Deg ee P og am in
In o ma ion Managemen
Knowledge Managemen impac in P ojec Managemen
Bes P ac ice Model o P ojec Managemen
Ped o Manuel Fe nandes Veloso Dominguez
Disse a ion
p esen ed as pa ial equi emen o ob aining he Mas e Deg ee P og am in In o ma ion Managemen
NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School
Ins i u o Supe io de Es a ís ica e Ges ão de In o mação
Uni e sidade No a de Lisboa
MGI
NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School
Ins i u o Supe io de Es a ís ica e Ges ão de In o mação
Uni e sidade No a de Lisboa
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IMPACT IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
By
Ped o Manuel Fe nandes Veloso Dominguez
Mas e Thesis p esen ed as pa ial equi emen o ob aining he Mas e ’s deg ee in In o ma ion
Managemen , wi h a specializa ion in Knowledge Managemen and Business In elligence
Supe iso /O ien ado (a): Ped o Maia Mal a
Oc obe , 2023
ii
STATEMENT OF INTEGRITY
I he eby decla e ha ing conduc ed his academic wo k wi h in eg i y. I con i m ha I ha e no used
plagia ism o any o m o undue use o in o ma ion o alsi ica ion o esul s along he p ocess leading
o i s elabo a ion. I u he decla e ha I ha e ully acknowledge he Rules o Conduc and Code o
Hono om he NOVA In o ma ion Managemen School.
[Ped o Manuel Fe nandes Veloso Dominguez]
[Lisbon, 20/10/2023]
iii
DEDICATION
A b ie eminde o his jou ney
“A smoo h sea ne e made a skilled sailo ”.
F anklin D. Roose el
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like o begin by hanking e e yone who has been a pa o his inc edible jou ney ha has led
o he comple ion o my mas e ’s hesis. I has been a challenging and ul illing expe ience, and in
addi ion o ha , I am eally g a e ul o he encou agemen and suppo ha I ha e ecei ed along his
pa h.
Fi s , I wan o exp ess my deepes hanks o my dedica ed p o esso , Ped o Mal a. You pa ience,
guidance, and con inuous eedback ha e been aluable h oughou his hesis, shaping i in o a
comp ehensi e and insigh ul wo k. You men o ship has been an impo an pa o my academic
jou ney. Since he beginning, you we e open o explo ing he opics ha I was mos in e es ed in and
helping me de ine my esea ch.
I am also e y g a e ul o all he indi iduals who pa icipa ed in and emb aced he challenge o
alida ing he amewo k I ha e de eloped. You insigh s and con ibu ions ha e en iched he quali y
o his s udy.
Las bu no leas , I wan o hank my amily and iends. You suppo , unde s anding, and
encou agemen ha e been my pilla s o s eng h du ing his demanding pa h. You belie in me has
made his jou ney mo e meaning ul, and I am deeply g a e ul o you p esence in e e y momen .
This hesis e lec s no jus my e o s, bu also he collec i e encou agemen and suppo o e e yone
men ioned abo e. Thank you om he bo om o my hea o being such an impo an pa o my
academic jou ney.

ABSTRACT
This hesis aims o explo e he ela ionship be ween Knowledge Managemen and P ojec
Managemen and hei in luence on p ojec success. In oday’s as -paced en i onmen , whe e
knowledge is he p ima y sou ce o compe i i e ad an age, i ’s c ucial o companies o ealize he
impo ance o knowledge managemen ; o he wise, i may esul in losing o compe i o s. The s udy
add esses he need o a s uc u ed amewo k ha enhances e iciency and success h oughou he
p ojec li e cycle. The esea ch p ocess in ol ed an ex ensi e li e a u e e iew and in e iews wi h
p ojec managemen expe s, e ealing bo h he s eng hs and limi a ions o he p oposed amewo k.
The amewo k consis s o h ee key phases: "Be o e" o p oac i e p ocess imp o emen , "Du ing"
o c i ical p ojec managemen s ages, and "A e " o pos -p ojec knowledge ans e and
e alua ion. The in e iews highligh ed he amewo k's po en ial o b idge communica ion gaps,
acili a e knowledge ans e , and imp o e p ojec success a es. Howe e , challenges we e iden i ied,
such as he lack o in o ma ion on he KM-PM in e sec ion and po en ial esis ance o cul u al and
o ganiza ional changes in la ge o ganiza ions. Fu u e esea ch should in ol e p ac ical es ing and
alida ion o he amewo k in eal-wo ld business cases.
KEYWORDS
Knowledge Managemen ; P ojec Managemen ; Bes P ac ice Model;
Sus ainable De elopmen Goals (SGD):
i
INDEX
1. In oduc ion .................................................................................................................. 1
2. Li e a u e e iew .......................................................................................................... 2
2.1. Knowledge Managemen ...................................................................................... 2
2.2. P ojec Managemen ............................................................................................. 6
2.3. Implemen ing/Combining Knowledge Managemen in P ojec Managemen ... 16
3. Me hodology .............................................................................................................. 20
Concep ual Model ...................................................................................................... 21
4. Bes p ac ice model .................................................................................................... 22
5. Resul s and discussion ................................................................................................ 30
5.1. In e iews ............................................................................................................ 30
5.2. Syn hesis and Resul s .......................................................................................... 32
6. Conclusions and u u e wo ks .................................................................................... 36
Bibliog aphical REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 38
Appendix A ...................................................................................................................... 40
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figu e 1 - Fou modes o knowledge con e sion (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995) .......................... 3
Figu e 2 - Con inuous Inno a ion (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995) .................................................. 5
Figu e 3 - Wa e all Model (Adobe Communica ions Team, 2022) ......................................... 10
Figu e 4 - Agile Me hodology (Jose Luis Amo os, 2022) .......................................................... 11
Figu e 5 - The ou phases o he p ojec li e cycle (Wes land, 2007) ..................................... 13
Figu e 6 - P ojec ini ia ion ac i i ies (Wes land, 2007) ........................................................... 13
Figu e 7 - P ojec planning ac i i ies (Wes land, 2007) ........................................................... 14
Figu e 8 - P ojec execu ion ac i i ies (Wes land, 2007) ......................................................... 15
Figu e 9 - P ojec closu e ac i i ies (Wes land, 2007) ............................................................. 15
Figu e 10 - P oposed heo e ical amewo k o p ojec knowledge sha ing con ibu ion o
p ojec (Yeong & Lim, 2011) ............................................................................................. 17
Figu e 11 - Knowledge managemen and p ojec /p og am (Yeong & Lim, 2011) .................. 18
Figu e 12 - Role o knowledge managemen in p ojec (Yeong & Lim, 2011) ......................... 19
Figu e 13 - Concep ual Model .................................................................................................. 21
Figu e 14 - Bes P ac ice Model ............................................................................................... 22
iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Ques ions s Conside a ions ..................................................................................... 33
6
gene a ing g ea e e enues; enhancing use accep ance; and/o inc easing compe i i eness” as
s a ed by Ajmal e al. (2010).
2.2. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Nowadays, mos o ganiza ions ha e s a ed o adop a p ojec -o ien ed app oach o managemen , in
which hey emphasize he managemen o single p ojec s, a ne wo k o p ojec s, and he ela ionships
be ween he company and hese p ojec s. The objec i e is o deli e supe io p oduc s, se ices, and
esul s ha a e sus ained by cus ome s and use s. Wi h p ojec s being conside ed s a egic asse s, he
ocus now is how o suppo hem e ec i ely so ha hey align wi h he o ganiza ion's s a egic goals
and objec i es and deli e he bene i s ou lined in he ini ial business cases. As no ed by Dinsmo e,
p ojec s ha e become ubiqui ous in all aspec s o o ganiza ions, and o o ganiza ions o h i e, hey
mus con inuously c ea e new p og ams and p ojec s, leading o a p ojec - ocused way o wo king
(Le in, 2010).
E en hough his end is qui e new, p ojec s as a concep ha e been a ound o a long ime. P ojec s
a e p e alen and a d i ing ac o o many businesses in a ange o sec o s, including IT, cons uc ion,
o e en pha maceu icals. They in ol e change and he c ea ion o some hing new, wi h a clea
beginning and ending. The pace o change has accele a ed, making excellen p ojec managemen
essen ial o o ganiza ions o h i e (Dinismo e & Cabanis-B ewin, 2010).
Bu wha de ines a p ojec ? The bigges o ganiza ions in P ojec Managemen a ound he globe de ine
i , such as The P ojec Managemen Ins i u e (PMI), O ice o Go e nmen Comme ce (OGC) and he
P ojec Managemen Associa ion o Japan (PMAJ), espec i ely. S a ing wi h The Ins i u e’s P ojec
Managemen Body o Knowledge guide (PMBOK) de ined p ojec as “a empo a y endea ou
unde aken o c ea e a unique p oduc , se ice, o esul ," while acco ding o he PRINCE2 guide, a
p ojec is “a empo a y o ganiza ion ha is c ea ed o he pu pose o deli e ing one o mo e business
p oduc s acco ding o an ag eed business case." Las bu no leas , PMAJ’s P ojec & P og am
Managemen guide men ions ha “p ojec e e s o a alue c ea ion unde aking based on a speci ic,
which is comple ed in a gi en o ag eed ime ame and unde cons ain s, including esou ces and
ex e nal ci cums ances” (Yeong & Lim, 2011).
Wha abou P ojec Managemen ? Again, he same o ganiza ions ha e de ined P ojec Managemen
espec i ely: PMBOK as “ he applica ion o knowledge, skills, ools, and echniques o p ojec ac i i ies
o mee he p ojec equi emen ”; PRINCE2 guide as ” he planning, delega ing, moni o ing and con ol
o all aspec s o he p ojec , and he mo i a ion o hose in ol ed, o achie e he p ojec objec i es
wi hin he expec ed pe o mance a ge s o ime, cos , quali y, scope, bene i s and isks” and inally
PMAJ’s P ojec & Managemen guide as “ he p o essional capabili y o deli e , wi h due diligence, a
p ojec p oduc ha ul ils a gi en mission, by o ganizing a dedica ed p ojec eam, e ec i ely
combining he mos app op ia e echnical and manage ial me hods and echniques and de ising he
mos e icien and e ec i e wo k b eakdown and implemen a ion ou es” (Yeong & Lim, 2011).
The eason o explaining he de ini ions o p ojec and p ojec managemen is no aimed a exposing
hei di e ences bu a he showing hei simila i ies and complemen a i y.

7
Acco ding o he PMBOK, he inc ease in p ojec managemen indica es ha he applica ion o
app op ia e knowledge, p ocesses, skills, ools, and echniques can ha e a signi ican impac on p ojec
success (PMI 2008). The main objec i e o p ojec managemen is o ensu e a p ojec is comple ed
wi hin he equi ed scope de ined by he s akeholde s, wi hin he p ojec budge , on ime, and wi h a
quali y p oduc o se ice as a esul .
So, wha makes a p ojec success ul? S a ing wi h he de ini ion o success. Acco ding o he Me iam-
Webs e Dic iona y de i ed om he e b succeed, in La in succede e. “Success is a a ou able o
desi ed ou come”, as s a ed in he dic iona y.
P ojec managemen aims o achie e he comple ion o a p ojec wi hin he speci ied scope ou lined
by s akeholde s, while mee ing budge , ime, and quali y equi emen s o deli e a sa is ac o y
p oduc o se ice as he ou come.
This adi ional de ini ion is widely used when i comes o de ining a success ul p ojec , howe e o he
o ganiza ions/au ho s added addi ional dimensions o he c i e ia o p ojec success, besides he
budge , ime and quali y equi emen s; Fo example, PMAJ akes in o conside a ion heal h, sa e y and
en i onmen as key ac o s.
I is e y challenging o ha e he igh c i e ia o wha makes a p ojec success ul. Since p ojec s
in ol e di e en s akeholde s, he e will ne e be a se o c i e ia ha bene i s e e yone; di e en
pe spec i es will necessa ily be biased owa ds one o he sides, ei he he cus ome o he
o ganiza ion.
Acco ding o Yeong & Lim inspi ed by Tu ne ’s wo k, in addi ion o he adi ional de ini ion o p ojec
success, he added nine c i e ia:
• The p ojec inc eases he sha eholde alue o he pa en o ganiza ion;
• The p ojec gene a es a p o i ;
• The p ojec p o ides he desi ed pe o mance imp o emen ;
• The new asse wo ks as expec ed;
• The new asse p oduces a p oduc o p o ides a se ice ha consume s wan o buy;
• The new asse is easy o ope a e;
• The p ojec is inished on ime, o budge , and wi h he desi ed quali y;
• The p ojec eam has a sa is ac o y expe ience, and he p ojec me hei needs;
• The con ac o s made a p o i .
“P ojec success needs o balance he needs o e e ybody in he o ganiza ion. The p ojec success
c i e ia ocus on success as a whole. The op h ee poin s la e o highe -le el s a egic goals. The middle
h ee poin s ela e o he p ojec ’s ou come on whe he he p ojec deli e ed wha was expec ed. The
las h ee poin s assess he wo ks o he p ojec as well as he ou pu s o he p ojec ” (Yeong & Lim,
2011).
8
Acco ding o he S andish G oup’s Chaos Repo o 2015, which collec ed da a be ween 2011 and
2015 om all su eyed p ojec s ha we e conside ed o be success ul and we e deli e ed on ime, on
budge , and wi h he equi ed ea u es and unc ions, in 2011 only 39% o hose we e success ul, and
in 2015 ha numbe d opped o 36% (S andish G oup, 2015).
Based on his s a is ic, i is clea ha a ound 60% o he p ojec s su eyed a e ailing a some hing.
This demons a es ha p ojec managemen expe s may no ha e success ully applied knowledge
ga he ed om ea lie ini ia i es o imp o e he chances ha cu en and u u e p ojec s will succeed.
This gi es us a on o oom o de elopmen .
Why is i so di icul o achie e a highe success a e o p ojec s? To answe ha ques ion, i is
impo an o unde s and he main limi a ions o P ojec Managemen . I is impe a i e o men ion ha
in he con ex o p ojec managemen , limi a ions and disad an ages a e dis inc e ms, because
limi a ions e e o a i icial bounda ies se by p ojec managemen , while disad an ages a e undesi ed
ou comes ha esul om using p ojec managemen . Some o he exis ing p ojec managemen
limi a ions a e lis ed below.
Inabili y o “s ick” wi h he p ojec scope.
This i s limi a ion is inhe en ly co ela ed wi h P ojec Managemen . In a as -paced en i onmen like
he one in which we li e, changes happen e e y day, and p ojec s ine i ably su e om hose
consequences. Due o ha , s icking o he o iginal p ojec scope is challenging. Un o una ely, his
limi a ion equen ly causes p ojec cancella ions, budge o e uns, and delays.
Inabili y o ully align he p ojec objec i es wi h he business/o ganiza ional s a egy.
This second limi a ion is mo e ela ed owa ds he o ganiza ion. As is known, P ojec Manage s a e
esponsible o managing speci ic p ojec s and no he o ganiza ion as a whole. While p ojec s a e
ypically s a ed wi h a clea ela ionship and alignmen wi h he o e all co po a e s a egy by
s akeholde s and execu i es, P ojec Manage s alone a e no capable o ensu ing ha hei p ojec s
emain aligned wi h he company's s a egy. To add ess his limi a ion, P og am Managemen was
in oduced as a highe le el o manage ial con ol o ensu e and sus ain alignmen .
Inabili y o manage p ojec s wi h unspeci ied budge and/o schedule.
Nowadays, P ojec Managemen aces a signi ican limi a ion in his aspec . As men ioned abo e, he
adi ional de ini ions (budge , ime, and quali y) a e key ac o s ha in luence he deli e y,
cons aining a p ojec wi h a ixed budge and imeline can esul in comp omised quali y, which could
ha e long- e m consequences. I we go back a ew housands o yea s and look o he inc edible
p ojec s ha s ill li e in ou days, such as he py amids o Gize; limi ing his kind o p ojec s which
migh ha e impac ed he quali y and wonde associa ed wi h hem. Due o he cons ain s o a budge
and imeline, p ojec managemen equen ly esul s in p ojec s being deli e ed la e and wi h lowe -
han-expec ed quali y. This leads o esou ces no gi ing hei bes e o s and an o e emphasis on
deli e ing p ojec s wi hin he se imeline.
9
Dependence on unc ional managemen
Lack o con ol he P ojec Manage has o e he esou ces is clea ly a d awback acco ding o
adi ional (non-agile) p ojec managemen . Func ional manage s, o whom hey di ec ly epo , a e
he owne s o he esou ces and who also enjoy hei loyal y, app ecia ion, and espec . Because o
his, p ojec manage s equen ly ha e o ely on unc ional manage s and esou ces, which can lead
o issues. Fo P ojec Manage s o be success ul, hey equen ly ha e o make concessions o p o ide
some hing in exchange. I is impo an o no e ha in highly p ojec ized o ganiza ions, his cons ain
is minimal.
Following an exclusi e me hodology
In o de o success ully manage a p ojec , he p ojec manage mus choose and ollow a ce ain
me hodology, such as he es ablished (wa e all) echnique o he mo e ecen Agile app oach. Once
a me hodology is chosen, i is ypically no changed mid-p ojec , e en i ano he me hodology may be
be e sui ed o he p ojec . Being cons ained by an exclusi e, immu able app oach, ei he a he
o ganiza ional le el o he p ojec le el, comp omises and educes he p ojec 's po en ial and he
esou ces in ol ed (P ojec Managemen Lea ning, 2023).
Remo ing hese cons ain s can lead o be e p ojec managemen and highe quali y p ojec
ou comes.
A e explo ing he Limi a ions o P ojec Managemen , i is ime o unde s and he li e-cycle o a
p ojec .
Wha is a P ojec Li e Cycle?
Acco ding o Ra ind an V a “P ojec Li e Cycle (PLC) is a sequence o P ojec Phases and desc ibes a
Road Map on how he p ojec is c ea ed, planned o , and olled ou o use. A he end o e e y phase,
he e mus be an ou pu o deli e able; o he wise, he phase would ha e been a was e o ime”.
Nowadays, he e a e se e al ypes o p ojec li e cycles ha a e ei he designed o mee speci ic
indus ies, he na u e o he p ojec s, o o ganiza ions. Some o ganiza ions ollow s anda d PLCs, while
o he s de elop a cus omized PLC ha aligns wi h hei business p ocesses, which could possibly gi e
hem a compe i i e ad an age.
Each PLC has a speci ic low. As a gene al app oach, he majo i y o PLC be o e s a ing a p ojec , de ine
some poin s. One o he i s examples is he business need, which answe s he ques ion: why do we
need his p ojec ? A e ha ing ha de ined, d aw he p ojec de ini ion, in o de o mee he need
p e iously men ioned. P io o beginning he p ojec , we mus de ine he eam and choose hem. Wi h
ha se , we can s a he p ojec (Ra ind an V, 2023).
Again, as men ioned abo e, each o ganiza ion could ha e di e en phases o each li e cycle o a
p ojec , his is jus a small sample o wha could exis in o ganiza ions. In heo y, he e a e hund eds
o o ma s, each one pa icula and ailo ed o he o ganiza ion and he kind o p ojec s hey a e
u ilized in.
10
P ojec Me hodology and F amewo ks
The P ojec Li e Cycle ou lines he sequen ial s eps equi ed o implemen a p ojec , while he P ojec
Me hodology p o ides he app oach and s a egy o be used in he implemen a ion. I is possible o
he P ojec Me hodology o be independen o any pa icula P ojec Li e Cycle.
Nowadays, se e al me hodologies and amewo ks can be used in p ojec s and in o ganiza ions. Each
one o hem has i s ad an ages and disad an ages, i is up o he o ganiza ion o decide which one is
mo e sui able o hei needs. Nowadays, we can coun on mul iple me hodologies and amewo ks
such as: Wa e all, Agile, Sc um, Kanban, Ex eme P og amming (XP), PRINCE2, PMBOK, Six Sigma,
Lean, C i ical Chain P ojec Managemen , e c…
I is a ac ha all he P ojec Managemen me hodologies and amewo ks a e essen ially di e en
ways o app oach a p ojec . Each one o hem has a unique p ocess and wo k low.
To illus a e a ew examples, bellow will be explained in summa y wo o he mos used models. (Two
o he mos popula so wa e de elopmen models).
Wa e all Model
Figu e 3 - Wa e all Model (Adobe Communica ions Team, 2022)
In 1970, Wins on Royce in oduced he Wa e all model as a o mal idea in so wa e enginee ing
h ough a published pape . This model philosophy was inhe i ed om he ha dwa e manu ac u ing
s a egies used in he 70s, which emphasize a highly s uc u ed app oach (Adobe Communica ions
Team, 2022).
The Wa e all Model is a adi ional me hod o p ojec execu ion ha ollows a sequen ial
de elopmen p ocess like a wa e all h ough all he phases o a p ojec ; each phase can only begin
once he p eceding one has ended. This app oach is especially bene icial o p ojec s wi h clea ly
de ined scopes ha a e unlikely o change.
11
Agile Me hod
Figu e 4 - Agile Me hodology (Jose Luis Amo os, 2022)
Edmonds p oposed he "Agile" o "Ligh weigh " me hods in a esea ch pape in 1974. These me hods
la e de eloped in o he popula and widely used agile so wa e de elopmen me hodologies, such as
"Sc um" in 1995, "C ys al Clea " in 1996, "Ex eme P og amming" in 1997, "Adap i e So wa e
De elopmen " in 1998, "Dynamic Sys ems De elopmen Me hod" in 1995, and "Fea u e D i en
De elopmen " in 1999. In 2001, a g oup o pionee s in he ield o agile so wa e de elopmen joined
o ces and published he "Agile Mani es o" (McCo mick, 2012).
The me hodology was c ea ed in esponse o he p oblems he so wa e de elopmen sec o was
ha ing wi h high a es o p ojec delays and ailu e. Indus y leade s ealized ha an inno a i e
app oach o so wa e de elopmen managemen was necessa y o add ess hose challenges.
Thus, Agile was c ea ed, speci ically designed o so wa e de elopmen , since scope modi ica ions a e
common and equen ly expec ed in he indus y. Agile makes i possible o p oduce unc ional
so wa e applica ions quickly and allows o con inuing imp o emen s depending on changing
equi emen s.
Wha is he di e ence be ween Wa e all and Agile?
Agile is a mo e adap able, i e a i e app oach ha akes on he planning, design, implemen a ion, and
es ing ac i i ies in sho e , ecu ing cycles as opposed o he Wa e all model, which emphasizes a
comp ehensi e planning, wi h each s age ully inished be o e mo ing on o he nex (Adobe
Communica ions Team, 2022).

12
P ojec Managemen Li e Cycle
Rega dless o he ype o p ojec , hey all unde go a simila sequence o s ages. Al hough he speci ic
asks may a y depending on he p ojec , hey all ollow a simila amewo k ha includes a beginning,
a middle, and an end. This is known as he p ojec managemen li e cycle.
To ensu e success in p ojec managemen , i is essen ial o ha e a comp ehensi e unde s anding o
he p ojec li e cycle. This in ol es managing dis inc deli e ables, s akeholde s, and challenges a each
s age (W ike, 2023).
This simila amewo k men ioned abo e in he P ojec Li e Cycle can a y om au ho o au ho . In
ac , acco ding o Pin o & Sle in s udy, he e a e ou -phase li e cycle. The concep ualiza ion is he
ini ial s age o a p ojec whe e op managemen ecognizes a s a egic need, es ablishes p elimina y
goals, and explo es a ailable esou ces. I in ol es easibili y decisions by answe ing key ques ions
ela ed o he p oblem, goals and esou ces. Following he Planning phase, a o mal se o plans is
es ablished o accomplish he ini ial goals. In he Execu ion phase, he p ojec 's wo k is ca ied ou ,
ma e ials and esou ces a e p ocu ed, and pe o mance capabili ies a e con inually es ed. Finally,
he e is he e mina ion phase, which includes disbanding he p ojec eam, eleasing esou ces, and
ans e ing he comple ed p ojec o he in ended use s (Pin o & Sle in, 1998). Howe e , Tonnquis ,
de ends ha he p ojec li e cycle should also consis in 4 p ojec phases, s a ing wi h p e-s udy, by
analysing p e equisi es and speci ying he assignmen ; planning, which ansla es in o he p oduc ion
o plans o he nex phase; execu ion which is he wo k in he p ojec and implemen a ion o he
esul ; and inally closu e, o e alua e and close he p ojec . I is impo an o men ion ha he model
also includes impac ealiza ion and e i ica ion o he business impac goal. In o de o ensu e ha
he p ojec is ac ually ollowed up on and e alua ed (Tonnquis , 2009). While hese p ojec
managemen heo ies sha e a common goal and exhibi simila i ies, i 's in iguing o obse e ha
ce ain au ho s end o o e hei unique pe spec i e on he ideal p ojec li e cycle. Fo he pu pose
o his s udy, he heo y below will be he one used om now on.
Wes land in he book The P ojec Managemen Li e Cycle: A Comple e S ep-by-s ep Me hodology o
Ini ia ing Planning Execu ing and Closing he P ojec ; de ends ha he e a e ou phases wi hin he
p ojec li e cycle, s a ing wi h p ojec ini ia ion, planning, execu ion, and closu e (Wes land, 2007).
13
Figu e 5 - The ou phases o he p ojec li e cycle (Wes land, 2007)
Ini ia ion
The i s phase o a p ojec is p ojec ini ia ion, whe e a business p oblem o oppo uni y is iden i ied,
and a business case wi h po en ial solu ion op ions is c ea ed. A s udy is conduc ed o assess all he
possible solu ions a e he ecommended solu ion is p oposed. The p ojec is ini ia ed, ou lining he
objec i es, scope, and s uc u e o he p ojec , and a p ojec manage is appoin ed. The p ojec
manage ec ui s a eam and es ablishes an o ice en i onmen , and app o al is sough o he nex
phase, p ojec planning. In his phase, he p ojec scope is de ined in de ail.
“This in ol es c ea ing a:
• P ojec plan ou lining he ac i i ies, asks, dependencies and ime ames;
• Resou ce plan lis ing he labou , equipmen and ma e ials equi ed;
• Financial plan iden i ying he labou , equipmen and ma e ials cos s;
• Quali y plan p o iding quali y a ge s, assu ance and con ol measu es;”
Figu e 6 - P ojec ini ia ion ac i i ies (Wes land, 2007)
14
Planning
A e he p ojec 's objec i es, bounda ies, and s uc u e ha e been ou lined in he e ms o e e ence,
he p ojec p og esses o he de ailed planning phase.
“This in ol es c ea ing a:
• P ojec plan ou lining he ac i i ies, asks, dependencies and ime ames;
• Resou ce plan lis ing he labou , equipmen and ma e ials equi ed;
• Financial plan iden i ying he labou , equipmen and ma e ials cos s;
• Quali y plan p o iding quali y a ge s, assu ance and con ol measu es;
• Risk plan highligh ing po en ial isks and ac ions o be aken o mi iga e hose isks;
• Accep ance plan lis ing he c i e ia o be me o gain cus ome accep ance;
• Communica ions plan desc ibing he in o ma ion needed o in o m s akeholde s;
• P ocu emen plan iden i ying p oduc s o be sou ced om ex e nal supplie s. A his poin he
p ojec will ha e been planned in de ail and is eady o be execu ed“
Figu e 7 - P ojec planning ac i i ies (Wes land, 2007)
Execu ion
Du ing he p ojec execu ion phase, he plans de eloped in he p e ious phase a e pu in o ac ion. The
p ojec eam pe o ms a ious managemen p ocesses o ensu e ha he p ojec deli e ables a e
being p oduced as planned, including moni o ing and con olling deli e able ou pu s, iden i ying
changes, isks, and issues, e iewing deli e able quali y, and measu ing each deli e able agains
accep ance c i e ia. A e all deli e ables ha e been p oduced and he cus ome has accep ed he inal
solu ion, he p ojec is p epa ed o closu e.
15
Figu e 8 - P ojec execu ion ac i i ies (Wes land, 2007)
Closu e
In he p ojec closu e phase, he inal deli e ables a e eleased o he cus ome , p ojec
documen a ion is handed o e o he business, supplie con ac s a e e mina ed, p ojec esou ces
a e eleased, and he closu e o he p ojec is communica ed o all s akeholde s. The inal s ep is o
conduc a pos -implemen a ion e iew o measu e he success o he p ojec and iden i y any aluable
lessons o u u e p ojec s.
Figu e 9 - P ojec closu e ac i i ies (Wes land, 2007)
As a inal no e, Wes land s a ed, “mo e han 90 pe cen o p ojec s unde aken ail o independen ly
e iew he le el o success a e comple ion. The eason is simply ha i akes ime and addi ional
budge o o mally close he p ojec and e iew i s le el o success.” This quo e ein o ces he idea ha
his las s ep is undamen al o achie e success (Wes land, 2007).
22
4. BEST PRACTICE MODEL
This new chap e will p opose a bes p ac ice model ha comp ises Knowledge Managemen
guidelines o e e y phase o a p ojec 's li e cycle, including Ini ia ion, Planning, Execu ion, and Closu e,
as p e iously men ioned.
To es ablish speci ic Knowledge Managemen guidelines o P ojec Managemen , i is impe a i e o
conside he en i e p ojec en i onmen and implemen a se o bes p ac ices aimed a mi iga ing
isks and maximizing he likelihood o success. The e o e, o add ess he exis ing li e a u e gap ha
ails o add ess he applica ion o Knowledge Managemen in he con ex o a p ojec li e cycle, a
p oposal will be made in he ollowing chap e . The model will be di ided in o h ee phases: Be o e,
Du ing, and A e he p ojec .
Al hough PRINCE2 de ines a p ojec as "a empo a y o ganiza ion c ea ed o deli e one o mo e
business p oduc s acco ding o an ag eed business case," (PRINCE2Wiki, 2023) he knowledge
gene a ed in his cycle is no ini e. Ra he , in o ma ion mus be collec ed and ans o med in o
knowledge o u u e euse. As La oisie amously s a ed, "No hing is los , no hing is c ea ed,
e e y hing is ans o med," and he SECI model also ecognizes ha knowledge is ans o med, no
los . By adop ing his p oposed model, o ganiza ions can no only imp o e p ojec success bu also
bene i om inc eased knowledge managemen capabili ies.
The be o e, du ing, and a e phases o a p ojec p o ide a ho ough o e iew o he en i e p ojec li e
cycle, including i s in e ac ions wi h he o ganiza ion and he en i onmen . This di ision enables
g ea e con ol o e he en i e li e cycle o a p ojec because i akes in o conside a ion p ocesses
be o e and a e he p ojec . The “Du ing” phase, howe e , will be he main ocus o he s udy, as i is
he mos c i ical phase o he success o he p ojec . I 's impo an o no e ha hese phases a e no
s a ic bu a he cyclical and in ini e. Al hough, he e a e speci ic guidelines o each phase, i 's key o
emembe ha hey a e in e connec ed and should be iewed as a con inuous p ocess.
Figu e 14 - Bes P ac ice Model

23
BEFORE
In oduc ion
The "Be o e" chap e add esses he p ocesses ha occu be o e he s a o a p ojec . A his poin ,
he o ganiza ion has no ye commi ed o a p ojec and is ee o any esponsibili ies. The pu pose o
his chap e is o iden i y and ecommend good p ac ices ha can be used o imp o e he en i e
o ganiza ional en i onmen , wi h he goal o inc easing he success a e o u u e p ojec s. By aking a
p oac i e app oach o p ocess imp o emen , he company can be e posi ion i sel o success ul
p ojec deli e y.
This leads us o he c i ical ques ion: wha p ac ices and p ocesses should be implemen ed du ing he
be o e phase o ensu e a highe success a e o a p ojec ?
Be o e men ioning he guidelines, i is impo an o highligh ha in his phase he s a egies a e
o ganiza ion d i en.
Guidelines
De ine a Communica ion App oach
The i s s ep o implemen is o ensu e an e ec i e communica ion app oach. I plays an essen ial
ole in a company's success because i gua an ees ha e e yone is wo king owa d common goals and
unde s ands hei asks. I encou ages a cul u e o anspa ency, us , and accoun abili y, which
esul s in a mo e engaged and mo i a ed s a . E ec i e communica ion elimina es misunde s andings
and con lic s, p omo es eedback, and acili a es quick esolu ion o issues, which leads o inc eased
p oduc i i y and cus ome sa is ac ion.
De ine Knowledge Managemen So E e yone Can Unde s and I
Ha ing he Communica ion App oach es ablished we should now de ine Knowledge Managemen . As
men ioned by Le in he lack o a s anda d de ini ion o Knowledge Managemen poses a majo
challenge o o ganiza ions. Un il a KM s anda d is es ablished, each o ganiza ion mus s udy he
a ailable de ini ions and choose one ha is consis en wi h i s goals and objec i es. The concep o
knowledge managemen should emphasize people and go e nance a he han ools and p ocedu es,
and i should include explici goals, objec i es, and measu emen s o demons a e i s alue. The
a i udes o people in ol ed in KM, om indi idual con ibu o s o execu i es, as well as he exis ing
o ganiza ional cul u e owa d i , mus also be conside ed o success ul implemen a ion (Le in, 2010).
Knowledge Managemen O ien a ion and T aining
A e ha ing Knowledge Managemen de ini ion, he nex s ep will be o ien a ion and aining. To
ensu e he success o a KM p ocess and sys em, i is c ucial o p o ide o ien a ion sessions o all
employees in he o ganiza ion. The o ien a ion should co e he easons o implemen ing he sys em
and he impo ance o he p ocess. I is also essen ial o cla i y each employee's ole and
esponsibili ies in he p ocess, including when and how o sha e knowledge asse s. In addi ion,
employees should be ained on how o use he sys em's unc ions and who o con ac o suppo o
ques ions. O ganiza ions can ensu e ha all employees unde s and he impo ance o Knowledge
Managemen and how o use he sys em e icien ly by p o iding such aining (Le in, 2010).
24
Sha ed Reposi o ies/Lessons Lea ned Reposi o ies and Documen /Con en Managemen Sys ems
Finally, ha ing all he p e ious guidelines comple ed, i is s ongly ad oca ed o he c ea ion o KM
eposi o ies p io o he s a o any p ojec s. I makes comple e sense o ha e his in as uc u e in
place and eady o u u e p ojec s, as well as o applica ion in o he a eas o he o ganiza ion. As a
esul , i is a s a egic in es men ha bene i s he en i e o ganiza ion. Also, Lie ni and Ribie e sugges
ha p ojec manage s pe cei e knowledge managemen p ac ices as ad an ageous and o en adop
sha ed eposi o ies, lessons lea ned eposi o ies, and documen /con en managemen sys ems o
suppo hese p ac ices (Yeong & Lim, 2011).
DURING
In oduc ion
The Du ing phase is he mos c i ical and signi ican phase o p ojec success, as i emphasizes he
p ojec 's li e cycle. This phase includes all s ages o a p ojec 's li e cycle, such as ini ia ion, planning,
execu ion, and closu e. Hence, speci ic guidelines will be p oposed o each o hese phases o ensu e
a smoo h and success ul p ojec ou come.
The p e ious guidelines we e o ganiza ion-d i en, howe e he ones ha will be p esen ed below a e
now p ojec ed-o ien ed. Un il his momen , a PM was no assigned.
Guidelines
To acili a e he in e p e a ion, he guidelines will be assigned o he espec i e phase. I is impo an
o men ion ha hese guidelines can be adjus ed depending on he me hodology used in he p ojec .
In addi ion, he guidelines a e no s ic ly owned by he P ojec Manage , meaning ha hese bes
p ac ices can be used and applied by di e en oles, howe e he majo i y will ocus on he PM ole.
Assuming he p e ious guidelines we e implemen ed, le ’s s a wi h he Ini ia ion, ollowed by
Planning, Execu ion and inally Closu e.
INITIATION
Pe o m a knowledge analysis o iden i y wha knowledge and skills a e needed o ini ia e he
p ojec .
A his s age, he P ojec Manage was no ye appoin ed; howe e , a business case wi h a po en ial
solu ion was al eady c ea ed, which means he objec i es, scope, and s uc u e a e abou o be
discussed. To conduc his p ocess, i would be bene icial o le e age sha ed eposi o ies such as
lesson-lea ned da abases and documen /con en managemen sys ems. This would enable us o
access and analyse in o ma ion ela ed o simila clien s o p ojec s ha ha e been comple ed in he
pas , helping us o gain aluable insigh s and knowledge. Pe o ming a Knowledge analysis allows o
he cla i ica ion o p ojec objec i es, he p epa a ion o a s uc u ed app oach o accommoda e he
p ojec 's magni ude, and he de ini ion o i s scope.
25
Ma ch he mos skilled eam membe s o he p oposed p ojec .
This guideline is closely ela ed o he p e ious one. The p ojec manage can easily iden i y he igh
eam membe s o he p ojec by le e aging he o ganiza ion's knowledge managemen eposi o y,
speci ically ela ed o he human esou ces ield, which includes in o ma ion on he skills, expe ience,
and expe ise o employees om p e ious p ojec s. This simpli ies he p ojec manage 's job and
inc eases he a e o p ojec success. Due o unexpec ed e en s, no all he p ojec s go as planned. Fo
ha eason, i may be necessa y o add mo e eam membe s du ing he p ojec . In such cases, ha ing
access o a knowledge managemen eposi o y can sa e a lo o ime and e o by allowing he p ojec
manage o iden i y he mos sui able i o he p ojec .
Ul ima ely, he P ojec Manage can gua an ee ha he igh people a e in ol ed om he beginning
o he p ojec , inc easing he a e o p ojec success.
Es ablish a knowledge sha ing cul u e.
A e assigning he eam ha will be wo king on he p ojec , i is c ucial o es ablish a cul u e o
knowledge managemen om he beginning. While his bes p ac ice was al eady men ioned implici ly
in he p e ious chap e as an o ganiza ion-d i en guideline, i is impo an o ein o ce i wi hin he
p ojec con ex . This is especially c i ical i he p ojec in ol es ex e nal membe s (such as ou sou cing
pa ne s) o s akeholde s. The e o e, i is essen ial o ensu e ha all pa ies in ol ed in he p ojec a e
awa e o and commi ed o implemen ing knowledge managemen p ac ices.
PLANNING
Le e age he o ganiza ion sha ed eposi o ies o assis on he planning ac i i ies.
Reaching his poin means ha he p oposal has been accep ed and he p ojec is abou o begin. I is
c ucial o s a planning e e y de ail o he p ojec , including he smalles ones. As p e iously
men ioned in he ini ia ion phase, he i s guideline can be used o assis in he c ea ion o all he
planning ac i i ies, such as he communica ion, quali y, and isk plan. While hese ac i i ies may di e
based on he me hodology used, he p inciple o le e aging knowledge managemen p ac ices should
be applied o all o hem.
C ea ion o a Knowledge Plan.
Taking in o conside a ion he p e ious guideline, a knowledge managemen plan mus be included as
pa o he p ojec planning p ocess. Th oughou he execu ion phase, his plan should desc ibe
speci ic ac ions and echniques o suppo e ec i e knowledge ans e and sha ing. The knowledge
managemen s a egy should be de eloped in o de o p omo e a cul u e ha alues knowledge
sha ing and coope a ion in bo h o mal and in o mal si ua ions. I should include i uals and p ac ices
ha encou age eam membe s o sha e knowledge, such as egula knowledge-sha ing sessions and
he use o sui able communica ion and collabo a ion ools. In his phase, he plan is jus being c ea ed;
in he nex phase, execu ion, his guideline will be exposed in mo e de ail.
26
EXECUTION
Tempo a y P ojec Reposi o y
The i s measu e in he Knowledge Plan will be he c ea ion o a Tempo a y P ojec Reposi o y. This
eposi o y can la e be inco po a ed in o he o ganiza ion's knowledge eposi o ies. Lessons lea ned
h oughou he p ojec , he isks and issues egis e , and o he ele an documen a ion a e some
examples o knowledge o be cap u ed. This will allow be e knowledge e en ion and euse in u u e
p ojec s. Addi ionally, conduc ing knowledge ans e ac i i ies is essen ial o ensu e ha all eam
membe s ha e a common unde s anding o he p ojec objec i es and equi emen s. Sha ing
knowledge and encou aging open communica ion among eam membe s imp o es p ojec success
while educing he possibili y o misunde s andings o misalignmen .
Ensu e Knowledge T ans e .
The second measu e is o ensu e e ec i e knowledge. Du ing he execu ion phase o he p ojec , i is
c ucial o es ablish e ec i e knowledge managemen p ac ices o ensu e ha all c ea ed and sha ed
knowledge is p ope ly s o ed, o ganized, and accessible o eam membe s. A key ocus is on knowledge
ans e , as es ablishing his p ac ice signi ican ly con ibu es o a highe p ojec success a e. The
knowledge ans e should happen ei he in o mal o in o mal momen s ha will be desc ibed in he
nex wo guidelines. As highligh ed by a ious au ho s, e ec i e p ojec knowledge-sha ing p ac ices
play a i al ole in p ojec success. Addi ionally, Owen's model sugges s ha knowledge is de eloped
a he ask le el, cap u ed and eused a he p ojec le el h ough pe sonal knowledge and men o ing,
and ans o med in o explici knowledge h ough p ojec documen a ion. Fo ha eason, he
socializa ion phase in Nonaka’s SECI model should be emphasized.
Make Knowledge Managemen pa o a Wo k Package in he Wo k B eakdown S uc u e
The i s momen o ensu ing e icien knowledge ans e is h ough o mal momen s. By
implemen ing his measu e, he p ojec manage is ac i ely p omo ing knowledge managemen wi hin
he p ojec , ega dless o whe he hey assume a mo e dis an o close ole wi h he eam membe s.
This ensu es ha knowledge sha ing, and collabo a ion a e encou aged h oughou he p ojec
li ecycle. Including KM in he WBS allows o be e communica ion wi h p og am o p ojec
s akeholde s, as well as p ope alloca ion o esou ces. I also es ablishes a speci ic app oach o
moni o ing and con olling he p og ess o KM ac i i ies.
Suppo and incen i e in o mal momen s o sha e hei knowledge and expe ience.
The second momen o ensu ing an e icien knowledge ans e is h ough in o mal momen s. I is
c ucial o adop a lexible app oach ha co e s all possible scena ios. By implemen ing his guideline,
p ojec manage s can ensu e ha all momen s and in e ac ions a e adequa ely add essed. No all
knowledge can be explici ly cap u ed and ans o med; o ha eason, in o mal momen s, aci
momen s, o mos known as socializa ion a e c ucial o a highe a e o p ojec success. As men ioned
ea lie , depending on he me hodology employed, oles may me ge, esul ing in p ojec manage s
assuming ei he a less echnical and mo e dis an ole o a eam lead ole, equi ing close in e ac ion
wi h eam membe s. This highligh s he impo ance o es ablishing e ec i e communica ion channels
and os e ing s ong ela ionships wi h he eam. P ojec manage s can gain aluable insigh s, be e
27
comp ehend he p ojec 's p og ess, and ensu e ha aci knowledge is sha ed and u ilized e ec i ely
by ac i ely engaging wi h eam membe s.
Regula ly e iew and upda e he knowledge managemen plan.
Finally, o ensu e he ongoing ele ance and e ec i eness o he plan c ea ed du ing he planning
phase, i is c ucial o he p ojec manage o ensu e ha he guidelines men ioned ea lie a e being
ollowed. The ideal ime o such a e iew is a he end o each phase o deli e y miles one, p o iding
a sui able window o e alua e he plan's pe o mance and make necessa y adjus men s o al e a ions.
This ensu es ha he knowledge managemen plan emains aligned wi h he p ojec 's e ol ing needs
and objec i es. Mo eo e , by conduc ing e iews a key miles ones, he p ojec eam can le e age
aluable insigh s and lessons lea ned o enhance u u e phases o deli e ies.
CLOSURE
Closing he Knowledge plan
In he inal s age o he p ojec , known as he closu e phase, i holds signi icance as i concludes he
business case and ensu es eadiness o deli e y. Despi e being a ela i ely sho phase, i is essen ial
o p ojec comple ion. Consequen ly, his guideline consolida es he closu e o he bes p ac ices ha
we e implemen ed in he las s age. Ha ing ha in mind, i is impo an o ensu e knowledge ans e .
A chi e he sha ed eposi o y con aining aluable lessons lea ned and impo an p ojec documen s
o u u e p ojec s; e alua e he posi i e impac o Knowledge Managemen on p ojec deli e ables.
AFTER
In oduc ion
The inal chap e , "A e ," is dedica ed o he pos -p ojec phase, which ocuses on ensu ing a comple e
ollow-up a e he closu e phase. I is c ucial o unde s and wha was accomplished and o u ilize he
lessons lea ned egis e o p e en mis akes and accumula e he knowledge gained om he cus ome
and he p ojec .
Simila o he Be o e phase, he guidelines ha will be p esen ed below a e o ganiza ion o ien ed.
Guidelines
Conduc p ojec in e iews.
I is essen ial o he o ganiza ion a e he p ojec o ge eedback om e e yone in ol ed. While i
may be mo e challenging o conduc hese in e iews in p ojec s in ol ing ou sou cing o ex e nal
membe s, hey p o ide aluable pe spec i es beyond wha he p ojec manage desc ibed a he end
o he p ojec . The o ganiza ion/boa d can inqui e abou he p ojec and eam en i onmen and
iden i y a eas o imp o emen . I is impo an o emphasize ha he opics and ques ions posed by
he o ganiza ion a e ailo ed speci ically o he p ojec a hand. This ailo ed app oach ensu es ha
he eedback collec ed is ele an and add esses he unique aspec s and challenges o he p ojec . This

28
guideline enhances he o ganiza ion's unde s anding o he p ojec 's s eng hs and a eas o
de elopmen , ul ima ely suppo ing con inuous g ow h and success.
Es ablish a Knowledge Managemen Rewa d and Recogni ion Sys em
A e he p ojec being deli e ed and conside ed success ul is impo an o ecognize and ewa d he
e o o he eam, in pa icula by s ic ly ollow he Knowledge Managemen plan. Encou aging s a
membe s o ac i ely pa icipa e in knowledge sha ing om he beginning is ideal, bu mos
o ganiza ions ind ha some ype o ewa d and ecogni ion sys em is equi ed un il knowledge
sha ing is he no m and no he excep ion. Implemen ing ewa ds and ecogni ion in he ea ly s ages
can e ec i ely os e a cul u e o knowledge sha ing. I is impo an ha hese ewa ds e lec he
a ious con ibu ions made by indi iduals. Simila ly, ecogni ion should ex end o hose who ensu e
he accu acy, eliabili y, and use ulness o c ea ed con en , as well as hose who egula ly assess
me ics o gauge he u iliza ion and a chi al s a us o knowledge asse s. By implemen ing a
comp ehensi e ewa ds and ecogni ion sys em, o ganiza ions can ein o ce he alue o knowledge
sha ing and encou age con inued engagemen (Le in, 2010).
T ack he Use ulness o he Knowledge Managemen Ini ia i e Th ough Me ics ha a e Visible in
he O ganiza ion
A egula e alua ion o he in eg a ion o knowledge managemen p ac ices wi hin o ganiza ional
p ocesses is c ucial. Go e nance mee ings o e a o um o deba ing he knowledge asse s' quali y
s a us, oge he wi h c i e ia ha assess how well hey co espond wi h business equi emen s.
Knowledge asse s ha a e ou da ed, ambiguous, o inco ec can a ec he abili y o make aluable
and in o med decisions. I is impo an o add ha he sha ed eposi o y is no he only sou ce, insigh s
om he P ojec Manage and he in e iews should be aken in o conside a ion. While achie ing
pe ec ion in quali y is una ainable, i is i al o p io i ize he in eg i y and use ulness o he knowledge
asse s du ing hese e alua ions (Le in, 2010).
Focus on Con inuous Imp o emen
Las bu no leas , he las guideline Con inuous Imp o emen . The phases o Be o e, Du ing, and A e
a e no isola ed e en s, bu a he a con inuous cycle. This bes p ac ice se es as he b idge o he
Be o e phase, aking in o conside a ion he lessons lea ned and ou pu s ob ained. I aims o d i e
imp o emen and g ow h wi hin he company, he eby enhancing he p obabili y o p ojec success,
by ga he ing hese insigh s he new knowledge will be inco po a ed in o he new cycle, p omo ing a
con inual cycle o de elopmen , imp o emen , and lea ning. Finally, as Le in men ion “I is necessa y
o also ecognize ha a key knowledge asse om a p ojec wo k may e en lead o a change in he
o ganiza ion's s a egic goals and ini ia i es o o he p ocesses used o comple e p oduc s, deli e
se ices and esul s, and deli e bene i s. The ocus is o mo e away om “knowledge is powe ” o
“knowledge sha ing is powe .”(Le in, 2010)
In conclusion, adop ing hese guidelines o knowledge managemen can lead o se e al bene i s.
Fi s ly, i p omo es knowledge e en ion wi hin he o ganiza ion, ensu ing ha aluable knowledge
and expe ise a e p ese ed o u u e p ojec s. Reduces cos s and minimizes he was e o esou ces
by a oiding unnecessa y duplica ion o e o s. Also, he deploymen o e ec i e knowledge
29
managemen s a egies imp o es p ojec success a es, which in he end aligns wi h he o ganiza ion's
p ima y goal. As a esul o his, cus ome s gain us in he o ganiza ion's capaci y o deli e high-
quali y p ojec s.
In addi ion, hese measu es may ha e a posi i e e ec on employees. They can imp o e hei own
skills and expe ise by p omo ing knowledge exchange and coope a ion, leading o pe sonal and
p o essional p og ess. Fu he mo e, a knowledge managemen cul u e suppo s employee
empowe men and engagemen since hey eel alued o hei e o s and ha e access o an ex ensi e
amoun o sha ed knowledge and ools. Finally, he combined e ec o imp o ed p ojec ou comes,
inc eased cus ome happiness, and inc eased employee in ol emen leads o he o ganiza ion's
o e all pe o mance and epu a ion.
No e ha he p oposed model ocuses on Knowledge Managemen guidelines o each phase o a
p ojec 's li e cycle, i does no accoun o he impac o ex e nal and in e nal ac o s ha may
in luence a p ojec 's success. Ex e nal ac o s such as poli ical, economic, and social condi ions, as well
as in e nal ac o s like o ganiza ional cul u e/people, echnology, and p ocesses, a e unique o each
o ganiza ion and can g ea ly impac p ojec ou comes. Al hough his model does no di ec ly add ess
hese ac o s, i is impo an o ecognize hei signi icance and hei po en ial impac on p ojec
success.
30
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5.1. INTERVIEWS
In his chap e , i will be p esen ed he mock-up model o and all he ansc ip ions o he in e iews.
MOCK UP
[INTRODUCTION]
Welcome o his in e iew, whe e ou p ima y objec i e is o alida e a model ha has been c ea ed
o add ess a c ucial gap in p ojec managemen . This model akes in o accoun he o ganiza ional
con ex and he p ojec en i onmen , wi h a pa icula ocus on he p ojec 's li e cycle. I is impo an
o add ha he guidelines p oposed ook in o conside a ion p ojec managemen weaknesses, bu also
wi h he main e o o inc easing he success a e o a p ojec .
Th oughou his in e iew, we will explo e he model om a gene al pe spec i e, and acco ding o
ha , we will di e in o mo e de ails o he model. Addi ionally, depending on you a ea o expe ise,
di e en ques ions will be asked, allowing me o gain deepe insigh s in o he p ac ical applicabili y o
he model. You aluable insigh s and eedback will play a signi ican ole in alida ing he e ec i eness
and applicabili y o his model.
Le 's begin ou discussion and explo e how his model can con ibu e o he imp o emen o p ojec
success a es.
1ST PART
This i s pa a e pe sonal ques ions jus o unde s and who I am in e iewing.
[QUESTION] May I ask o you ull name?
[QUESTION] Could you please p o ide you age?
[QUESTION] Wha is you gende (Op ional)?
[QUESTION] Which o ganiza ion do you cu en ly wo k o ?
[QUESTION] Wha is you ole o posi ion wi hin he o ganiza ion?
[QUESTION] Could you sha e a bi abou you p o essional backg ound and expe ience?
2ND PART
Assuming he indi idual ead he bes p ac ice model.
[QUESTION] Based on you unde s anding o he bes p ac ice model p esen ed, do you ag ee ha he
implemen a ion o his model will ha e an impac on p ojec s, in pa icula inc easing he success a e?
31
IF YES
[QUESTION] Could you please explain he posi i e aspec s o implemen ing his model in an
o ganiza ion? Speci ically, wha did you ind mos bene icial o liked he mos abou his model?
[QUESTION] A e he e any sugges ions o addi ions ha you would like o p opose o he model? This
could include in oducing ools, ew i ing guidelines, o e en sugges ing en i ely new ones.
IF NO
[QUESTION] Could you please p o ide some insigh s on he aspec s o he model ha did no mee
you expec a ions o ailed o deli e he desi ed esul ?
[QUESTION] Do you ha e any sugges ions o po en ial enhancemen s o modi ica ions o add ess he
iden i ied weaknesses in he model?
3RD PART
This pa will be spli in wo. One o he KM expe s he o he o he PM expe s.
KM Expe s
[QUESTION] Do you belie e ha hese guidelines e ec i ely encou age knowledge sha ing and
p ese a ion?
[QUESTION] Do you belie e ha adop ing his app oach would b ing bene i s o o ganiza ions,
pa icula ly in e ms o ensu ing a highe a e o p ojec success?
PM Expe s
[QUESTION] Do you conside his model o be a iable solu ion?
[QUESTION] Do you belie e ha he amewo k could be success ully implemen ed in one o you
p ojec s o wi hin you o ganiza ion?
[QUESTION] Do you belie e ha adop ing his app oach would b ing bene i s o o ganiza ions,
pa icula ly in e ms o ensu ing a highe a e o p ojec success?
Thank you o you ime!
No e ha he in e iews conduc ed o sus ain his s udy can be ound in Appendix A.
38
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES
Adobe Communica ions Team. (2022, Ma ch 18). Wa e all Me hodology: A Comple e Guide.
h ps://business.adobe.com/blog/basics/wa e all
Ajmal, M., Helo, P., & Kekäle, T. (2010). C i ical ac o s o knowledge managemen in p ojec
business. Jou nal o Knowledge Managemen , 14(1), 156–168.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/13673271011015633
Al-Zayya , A. N., Al-Khaldi, F., Tad os, I., & Al-Edwan, G. (2010). The E ec o Knowledge Managemen
P ocesses on P ojec Managemen . 2010. h ps://doi.o g/10.5171/2010
B a , E. (2002). Knowledge o In o ma ion. 71–90. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-0-387-35611-2_5
B eznik, K. (2018). Knowledge Managemen – om i s Incep ion o he Inno a ion Linkage. P ocedia-
Social and Beha io al Sciences, 238, 141–148. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.sbsp o.2018.03.017
Dinismo e, P. C., & Cabanis-B ewin, J. (2010). THE AMA HANDBOOK OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
THIRD EDITION.
Jose Luis Amo os. (2022). The Agile De elopmen P ocess o Mobile Apps.
h ps://www.k asamo.com/agile-de elopmen -p ocess/
Koskinen, K. U. (2004). KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE PROJECT COMMUNICATION AND
IMPLEMENTATION. P ojec Managemen Jou nal • 13 Managemen Ins i u e, 35(1), 13–19.
Le in, G. (2010). Knowledge Managemen Success Equals P ojec Managemen Success.
h ps://www.pmi.o g/lea ning/lib a y/knowledge-managemen -success-gene a e- alue-6656
McCo mick, M. (2012). Wa e all s. Agile Me hodology.
h p://www.mcco mickpcs.com/images/Wa e all_ s_Agile_Me hodology.pd
Mohammad Al-Gha ibeh, K. (2011). The Knowledge Enable s o Knowledge T ans e : An Empi ical
S udy in Telecommunica ions Companies. 2011, 13. h ps://doi.o g/10.5171/2011.328944
Nonaka, I. (2007). The Knowledge-C ea ing Company.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). THE KNOWLEDGE CREATING COMPANY IKUJIRO NONAKA
HIROTAKA TAKEUCHI.
No ako ic, D. (2019). KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INSIDE OF A SMALL ORGANIZATION: Case s udy
on knowledge sha ing in p oduc -based company.
Pin o, K., & Sle in, P. (1998). C i ical success ac o s ac oss he p ojec li e cycle.
h ps://www.pmi.o g/lea ning/lib a y/c i ical-success- ac o s-p ojec -li e-cycle-2131
PRINCE2Wiki. (2023). PRINCE2 Wiki. h ps://p ince2.wiki/ex as/wha -is-p ince2/

39
P ojec Managemen Lea ning. (2023). Wha A e he Limi a ions o P ojec Managemen ? – P ojec
Managemen Lea ning. h ps://p ojec managemen lea ning.com/wha -a e- he-limi a ions-o -
p ojec -managemen .h ml
Ra ind an V. (2023). PROJECT LIFE CYCLE VS PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFECYCLE; PROJECT
METHODOLOGY VS PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY.
h ps://medium.com/@p owiz911959/p ojec -li e-cycle- s-p ojec -managemen -li ecycle-
p ojec -me hodology- s-p ojec -managemen -e76549297a64
Rowley, J. (1999). Wha is knowledge managemen ? h p://www2.mcb.co.uk/mcb /lm.asp
Ruggles, R. (1996). Knowledge Managemen Tools.
S andish G oup. (2015). CHAOS REPORT 2015.
Te a, J. C., & Angeloni, T. (2003). Unde s anding he di e ence be ween In o ma ion Managemen
and Knowledge Managemen .
Tonnquis , B. (2009). P ojec managemen .
Wes land, J. (2007). The P ojec Managemen Li e Cycle: A Comple e S ep-by-s ep Me hodology o
Ini ia ing Planning Execu ing and Closing he P ojec . h ps://docplaye .ne /8069758-The-
p ojec -managemen -li e-cycle.h ml
W ike. (2023). P ojec Managemen Li e Cycle. h ps://www.w ike.com/p ojec -managemen -
guide/p ojec -li ecycle/
Yeong, A., & Lim, T. T. (2011). In eg a ing knowledge managemen wi h p ojec managemen o
p ojec success.
40
APPENDIX A
1s INTERVIEW
Welcome o his in e iew, whe e ou p ima y objec i e is o alida e a model ha has been c ea ed
o add ess a c ucial gap in p ojec managemen . This model akes in o accoun he o ganiza ional
con ex and he p ojec en i onmen , wi h a pa icula ocus on he p ojec 's li e cycle. I is impo an
o add ha he guidelines p oposed ook in o conside a ion p ojec managemen weaknesses, bu also
wi h he main e o o inc easing he success a e o a p ojec .
Th oughou his in e iew, we will explo e he model om a gene al pe spec i e, and acco ding o
ha , we will di e in o mo e de ails o he model. Addi ionally, depending on you a ea o expe ise,
di e en ques ions will be asked, allowing me o gain deepe insigh s in o he p ac ical applicabili y o
he model. You aluable insigh s and eedback will play a signi ican ole in alida ing he e ec i eness
and applicabili y o his model.
Le 's begin ou discussion and explo e how his model can con ibu e o he imp o emen o p ojec .
A b ie summa y o he i s pe son in e iewed. Gonçalo Nuno Ga cia De Ab eu Maximiano, se es
as a p ojec manage a Milenium BCP. T ansi ioning om an accoun managemen backg ound, his
jou ney in o p ojec managemen has been bo h in iguing and en iching. Cu en ly spea heading a
p ojec cen e ed a ound a So wa e as a Se ice ool, Gonçalo is esponsible o i s li ecycle
managemen , encompassing ma ke launch, ea u e enhancemen s, main enance, and comme cial
aspec s. His adap able na u e and commi men o excellence unde sco e his con ibu ions o he
success a es o he p ojec s he o e sees.
2ND PART
Assuming he indi idual ead he bes p ac ice model.
[QUESTION] Based on you unde s anding o he bes p ac ice model p esen ed, do you ag ee ha he
implemen a ion o his model will ha e an impac on p ojec s, in pa icula inc easing he success a e?
Yes, I do. I hink ha he model, he p oposed model b ings a e y impo an subjec o he able,
which is he capabili y ha eams and indi iduals as a whole, ha indi iduals and eams as a whole
ha e o sha e knowledge wi h each o he , and he ac is some hing ha we commonly ind, especially
in he inancial indus y whe e I'm cu en ly wo king, he e is his e y big gap whe e some indi iduals
migh own upon sha ing knowledge and sha ing bes p ac ices wi h ou eam membe s in o de o
main ain a ce ain sense o s a us o o p o ec hei sides o hei s ake in he p ojec . I hink ha he
way he model is buil ac ually add esses some o hese issues because i b ings a sense o inpu and
ewa d. Fo all indi iduals in e ms o i I ac ually sha e my knowledge and I ac ually pu p oduc i e
insigh s in o he p ojec and I'm able o do his and I'm able, o example, o e ie e he expe iences
ha I had in p e ious p ojec s and do he same hing as you said in he desc ip ion, i 's a e y cyclical
ool. So, he same p ac ices ha I'm doing in he end ga he ing eedback o he nex s ep, o he nex
p ojec . I hink ha he way he model is buil add esses some o he ques ions associa ed wi h people
hen o e ain in o ma ion ha hey do no sha e and a he same ime imp o e he success a e in he
p ojec s because he mo e knowledge ha you ha e on he able and he mo e sha ing and
unde s anding he eam does be ween hem. I do belie e ha i g ea ly inc eases he success a e o
41
p ojec s o a leas helps p ojec s o s eamline a bi be e and o a oid delaying deli e y da es o
unexpec ed e o s coming om eam membe s.
[QUESTION] Could you please explain he posi i e aspec s o implemen ing his model in an
o ganiza ion? Speci ically, wha did you ind mos bene icial o liked he mos abou his model?
So in e ms o he banking indus y, I do hink his model would be e y, e y success ul because you' e
alking abou a e y aging indus y, which ends o no sha e as much as one would hope so. As such,
he ac ha his model p omo es ha and he idea behind my easoning is ha i I can implemen his
a a smalle scale, I can ac ually ex apola e his in he u u e o bigge p ojec , such as i I can s a
wi h smalle objec i es, small wins, and hen ga he knowledge and hen implemen i on la ge scales.
I do belie e ha 's he main ad an age his model has. You can y, you can apply i o a small p ojec ,
unde s and how i beha es. Fo example, in a con olled en i onmen , o example, in an in e nal
p ojec wi h no implica ions o ex e nal s akeholde s o cus ome s, and hen y o implemen he
indings in hose p ojec s. I hink ha 's he main idea he e, o i was he main ad an age I see. Then
he ac is, when you' e discussing such aging indus ies, he ac ha he lack o knowledge sha ing
p ac ices end o accommoda e hese companies in a sense ha hey will no look o ha because i
hey a e accommoda ed o ha beha iou , hey will no wo k owa ds changing i . The ac is, i we
implemen his model and hen y o change he men ali y h ough he cou se o he o ganiza ion, I
do belie e ha i b ings a lo o ad an ageous p ac ices o eams.
[QUESTION] A e he e any sugges ions o addi ions ha you would like o p opose o he model? This
could include in oducing ools, ew i ing guidelines, o e en sugges ing en i ely new ones.
I don' hink he e's a lo I could say, bu he only ques ion I would ha e would be in he a e phase,
you do men ion some hing acking he use ulness o he KM ini ia i e h ough me ics. The ac is, I
couldn' eally unde s and, o example, how could you measu e hese ini ia i es? Fo example, would
you do i in a quali a i e way o quan i a i e way? Is i based on a nume ic me ics ha you ga he ?
Fo example, i he p ojec is deli e ed on da e, you conside ha , o example, 100% success. I i 's...
pas wo mon hs, pas due da e, is i 75%? Tha so o hings. I ac ually had some di icul y ying o
unde s and wha me ics could be implemen ed he e.
3RD PART
This pa will be spli in wo. One o he KM expe s he o he o he PM expe s.
PM Expe s
[QUESTION] Do you conside his model o be a iable solu ion?
Yes, de ini ely. Especially when you conside my pe sonal pe spec i e and hen ex apola e his o
o he o ganiza ions, some imes you' e wo king wi h ex e nal s akeholde s, which a e no all pa o
you eam o a leas you in e nal o ganiza ion. This amewo k ac ually comes ac oss a bi as an
agg ega o o opinions and ies o ake in o accoun all s akeholde s o he p ojec . O cou se, you
need o s a in e nally, and you need o p o ide an in e nal cul u e o people o accep he
amewo k as a iable solu ion. Bu hen i people inside you eam, o example, i hey a e deployed
o a cus ome , a e deployed in ano he eam ha i 's no he co e one om he p ojec , and hey b ing
42
his posi i e a i ude owa ds he amewo k, o he eams will be mo e inclined o adhe e o i . So as
such, I do hink i 's a e y iable solu ion, and one ha doesn' need ha much ine uning o wo k.
[QUESTION] Do you belie e ha he amewo k could be success ully implemen ed in one o you
p ojec s o wi hin you o ganiza ion?
Yes, de ini ely, yes.
[QUESTION] Do you belie e ha adop ing his app oach would b ing bene i s o o ganiza ions,
pa icula ly in e ms o ensu ing a highe a e o p ojec success?
I do hink so, bu I hink he main bene i would be changing o ganiza ional cul u e in some cases. O
cou se, I hink one leads o ano he . I you ha e a g ea e success a e in you p ojec s, hen you
o ganiza ion has a be e i and a be e en i onmen as a whole, because success d i es success. A
leas ha 's my pe spec i e. I you can implemen his amewo k ha will change he way he
o ganiza ion conduc s i sel in e ms o ga he ing eedback, u ilizing p e ious knowledge o build upon
o he u u e. I do hink ha a some poin he e will be a success associa ed wi h his amewo k. Then
ha success people will see, o cou se ha was e y success ul. How can I ex apola e ha o my
p ojec ? Then you ex apola e p ojec a e p ojec a e p ojec . u ilizing he eedback ha you b ing
om he p e ious i e a ions. Then you say, o cou se, his is such a g ea ool ha I will wo k wi h his
because his is being e y success ul. As such, my p ojec is success ul, he nex guy is success ul, and
hen my whole o ganiza ional cul u e is e y posi i e because e e yone is ha ing success. So, I hink
i 's on a psychological o a human s andpoin , i 's ac ually e y posi i e as well.
43
2ND INTERVIEW
Welcome o his in e iew, whe e ou p ima y objec i e is o alida e a model ha has been c ea ed
o add ess a c ucial gap in p ojec managemen . This model akes in o accoun he o ganiza ional
con ex and he p ojec en i onmen , wi h a pa icula ocus on he p ojec 's li e cycle. I is impo an
o add ha he guidelines p oposed ook in o conside a ion p ojec managemen weaknesses, bu also
wi h he main e o o inc easing he success a e o a p ojec .
Th oughou his in e iew, we will explo e he model om a gene al pe spec i e, and acco ding o
ha , we will di e in o mo e de ails o he model. Addi ionally, depending on you a ea o expe ise,
di e en ques ions will be asked, allowing me o gain deepe insigh s in o he p ac ical applicabili y o
he model. You aluable insigh s and eedback will play a signi ican ole in alida ing he e ec i eness
and applicabili y o his model.
Le 's begin ou discussion and explo e how his model can con ibu e o he imp o emen o p ojec
success a es.
A b ie summa y o he second pe son in e iewed. Helde Manuel Es e es Dias, holds he posi ion o
PMO leade a Cisco's p o essional se ices CX cen e in Lisbon. Wi h a backg ound in echnologies
and in o ma ion sys ems, Helde 's jou ney in o p ojec managemen has been mul i ace ed. S a ing
as a so wa e de elope , he p og essed h ough a ious oles a Cisco, including assis an manage ,
quali y lead, p ojec manage , and p og am manage . No ably, he led a eam o p ojec manage s in
a signi ican Cisco p og am wi h Voda one ac oss Eu ope. Las yea , he ansi ioned o his cu en
ole, ocusing on leading he PMO eam in he Sou he n Eu opean ma ke , encompassing coun ies
such as Po ugal, Spain, F ance, I aly, G eece, Is ael, Cyp us, and Mal a. Helde 's expe ise and
leade ship ha e been ins umen al in d i ing success wi hin he p ojec s and p og ams he o e sees.
2ND PART
Assuming he indi idual ead he bes p ac ice model.
[QUESTION] Based on you unde s anding o he bes p ac ice model p esen ed, do you ag ee ha he
implemen a ion o his model will ha e an impac on p ojec s, in pa icula inc easing he success a e?
The e a e some in e es ing poin s. So, one o hem ha I no iced ha i was in he beginning, ha is
you use a desc ip ion o PRINCE2. In ou PMO, he people go h ough he PMI ce i ica ions wi h PMP.
Bu anyway, in p ojec managemen , i 's he same assump ion. I is empo a y, igh ? So i is limi ed in
ime. I is unique, igh ? The esou ces a e limi ed. The hing he e is ha i is ini e. Bu he p ojec , as
you men ioned, is in ini e, no only in he knowledge ha is gene a ed bu also in he esul s. So he
p ojec has an impac ha will make i las . The p ojec doesn' las , bu he esul s do. One o he
esul s is knowledge managemen . I saw in you documen a e y in e es ing poin in e ms o be o e,
du ing, and a e . In e ms o he lessons lea ned, in e ms o he eposi o ies, and also wi h he eam.
So I saw se e al de ails he e ha I liked. De ini ely, many o he poin s ha you men ioned in he
documen ha you sen o me makes o al sense. Now he ques ion is, is his always applied in p ojec s,
no only in Cisco, I al eady wo ked in p ojec s also wi h many o he o ganiza ions. Un o una ely, no .
One o he easons why I was cu ious abou p io i izing his con e sa ion wi h you oday is because I
conside his one o he bigges pain poin s in p ojec managemen . People and companies, and e en
cus ome s, hey will p io i ize he esul s. Do you wan o make an ex ensi e isk iden i ica ion,

44
designing mi iga ion plans. No. We wan as . We wan cheap. E e y hing you do in a p ojec has a cos
o in money o in ime o in scope. No mally, he e is always a lo o p essu e o budge and o sa e
ma gin and o sa e money on p ojec s. So wha happens is ha o cu and many imes hese cu s, hey
come om he execu i e le els, om cus ome s e c... This I would apply no only o Cisco, bu widely,
le 's say o he co po a e and he business en i onmen . When you cu cos s, wha you will do, you
will cu on he isk managemen , you will cu on he ime, because lessons lea ned is a beau i ul wo
wo ds, and we ha e al eady mul iple cases whe e i was mo e han con i med how much money, ime,
impac , business impac , cus ome s we e posi i ely impac ed by good usage o lessons lea ned. Bu
lessons lea ned equi e ime in es men om he people and many imes he e is his ocus o dedica e
he ime o he PM o he enginee o make he implemen a ion, he deploymen , and no exac ly o
his lesson as well. One o he c i e ia ha , o example, we use in ou PMO, in he audi s, is o check
i he e is a lessons lea ned ac o , o example, in he dashboa ds o in he p ocess managemen om
he PMs. E en some imes we would like o see hese acke s mo e wide and mo e sha ed ac oss all
he o ganiza ion. Bu wha happens and you men ioned hese h ee ph ases in you phases on you
model, ha is he be o e, du ing and a e . So he closu e o he p ojec , when I was p ojec manage ,
I can ell you ha main pa o he p ojec , I was no able o make a p ope ending mee ing wi h he
cus ome . discussing lessons lea ned, discussing ou comes igh om he p ocess i sel . Because he
cus ome is busy, hey a e al eady in he new loop o he new p ojec o he new hing. This was al eady
deli e ed, he p io i y is al eady he nex hing o do. The p io i y is no o analyse wha was done. see
hings ha can be be e made in he nex ime. So e en wi h ou cus ome s, his is always also a igh ,
because you canno oblige he cus ome because when we a e mee ing wi h you so close. So a leas
wha we y o do is inside and wi hin ou eams, whe e hese acke s eques us lea n and sha e and
ex end globally ac oss all he eams. The e a e challenges wi h i . Yes, he e a e. No so much in
eposi o ies ha we s a ed a he opic ha you co e ed he e on you model. We ha e ied o iew
he acke s eposi o ies, he ways o access i , bu many imes also p ojec s, as we men ioned by he
de ini ion, hey a e unique. They a e e y speci ic. So one o he challenges wi h he lessons lea ned is
ha many imes you a e s a ing a p ojec and one o he hings ha we should do is wha ? Go o
eposi o ies, lessons lea ned, and see i he e is use ul ou comes o us. To see i he e a e cases ha
happened in he pas and ha can be use ul o us. One o he di icul ies is ha e e y hing is e y
speci ic. In one case, i was wi h ano he ope a ing sys em, ano he case, i was wi h ano he ype o
de ice. On his case, i was a pa ne in he middle on he o he case, i was using ano he ype o
pla o m. So, you know, many imes, his is also one o he challenges. The p ojec s a e so unique wi h
cus ome s ha a e unique. Because many imes you make he second p ojec wi h he same cus ome ,
bu he s akeholde s a e al eady di e en and he echnology is al eady di e en . This is one o he
challenges o lessons lea ned, is ha e e y hing is e y speci ic. Ne e heless, he e is always a lo o
juice ha we can squeeze when we make a p ope knowledge managemen , p ope documen a ion,
s o age, insu ance pla o ms, and sha ing hem widely ac oss he o ganiza ion.
IF YES
[QUESTION] Could you please explain he posi i e aspec s o implemen ing his model in an
o ganiza ion? Speci ically, wha did you ind mos bene icial o liked he mos abou his model?
A posi i e aspec always abou he model o he amewo k is ha i consolida es some hing. Because
i we ell e e yone ac oss he o ganiza ion, le 's egis e , le 's sha e i . How will people in e p e i ?
45
This always happens in di e en ways, in di e en manne s. So, ha ing a model o a p ocess ha is
consolida ed will gi e s uc u e, and s uc u e will de ini ely bene i a lo .
[QUESTION] A e he e any sugges ions o addi ions ha you would like o p opose o he model? This
could include in oducing ools, ew i ing guidelines, o e en sugges ing en i ely new ones.
I don' ha e any immedia e sugges ions o addi ions o p opose o he model. I belie e i would be
bene icial o p oceed wi h es ing i u he o ga he mo e insigh s and e alua e i s e ec i eness.
3RD PART
This pa will be spli in wo. One o he KM expe s he o he o he PM expe s.
[QUESTION] Do you conside his model o be a iable solu ion?
Yeah, de ini ely. Wi hou any doub . Look, when we ha e any model, one o he hings ha we always
ha e o do is o adap i also o o ganiza ion ha we a e whe e we a e ying o apply i . They'll say
his is like he ing edien s ha you make a cake and hen i will ge o he shape o he ecipien whe e
you place i , like a pudding. The model is he same, because e e y o ganiza ion is e y speci ic, di e en
needs, di e en ype o s akeholde s. So, in any model ha you migh p opose, he e will be always
adap a ions, o each speci ic case. Belie e me, changing p ocesses and dynamics in o ganiza ions is
no an easy p ocess. I 's no an easy ask o easy job. Wi h he equi ed adap a ions o each one o he
companies o o ganiza ions, I hink ha de ini ely and ha ing a consolida ed model o he knowledge
managemen is always an ad an age.
[QUESTION] Do you belie e ha he amewo k could be success ully implemen ed in one o you
p ojec s o wi hin you o ganiza ion?
Yes, comple ely, and I conside ha Cisco and he majo i y o he companies ha I know ha e a long
way o go in e ms o knowledge managemen . The e is al eady a e y good way ha was made. So
igh now, he e is al eady dashboa d, he single sou ce o u h whe e we ha e ca ego ized he
in o ma ion. Some imes people c ea e eposi o ies o in o ma ion, people c ea e dashboa ds. You
ha e all he in o ma ion, bu hen wha is he p oblem? You ha e o main ain i because hings change,
and we need o upda e ha in o ma ion. So one o he isks o knowledge and in o ma ion eposi o ies
is ha his is no only abou building hem up. I 's also abou main aining i , upda ing i , changing i ,
emo ing hings, and adding new hings.
[QUESTION] Do you belie e ha adop ing his app oach would b ing bene i s o o ganiza ions,
pa icula ly in e ms o ensu ing a highe a e o p ojec success?
I conside ha i also depends on wha he companies al eady ha e, igh ? I you a e speaking abou
he company, o example, he ai plane companies. They make a black box commi ee, hey ga he ,
and hey see wha happened he e. Wha happened he e? They will check e e y hing; hey will ack
e e y hing ha happened. They will see wha he oo cause was. They will upda e all he manuals
al eady aken in o accoun o his issue. They will implemen a esponse plan. Many imes, he pilo s
in he ai planes ha e a big book in case e e y hing ails, and in hese books, he e a e many pages ha
ha e w i en esponse plans. So, o e e y hing ha happens, hey upda e a knowledge base and hey
sp ead i widely. These changes a e implemen ed in all he lee o a speci ic model om a plane. So,
46
ai plane companies in isk managemen , knowledge managemen , hey ha e o sha e ac oss all he
companies, all he coun ies, e e ybody using ha model will ge he wo d o ecei e no i ica ions
abou his ha hey ha e o do. I needed, hey will collec he ai planes o make changes. I you go
wi h ou model o one o hese companies, hey al eady ha e e y elabo a e models. Bu , i you go o
a company ha i is a he momen wi hou he consolida ed p ocess o knowledge managemen , I
o ally belie e ha i will be e y bene icial, and de ini ely hey will ha e se e al cases whe e hey will
see esul s o adop ing se e al o he measu es ha I saw ha in he documen .
Thank you o you ime!
47
3RD INTERVIEW
Welcome o his in e iew, whe e ou p ima y objec i e is o alida e a model ha has been c ea ed
o add ess a c ucial gap in p ojec managemen . This model akes in o accoun he o ganiza ional
con ex and he p ojec en i onmen , wi h a pa icula ocus on he p ojec 's li e cycle. I is impo an
o add ha he guidelines p oposed ook in o conside a ion p ojec managemen weaknesses, bu also
wi h he main e o o inc easing he success a e o a p ojec .
Th oughou his in e iew, we will explo e he model om a gene al pe spec i e, and acco ding o
ha , we will di e in o mo e de ails o he model. Addi ionally, depending on you a ea o expe ise,
di e en ques ions will be asked, allowing me o gain deepe insigh s in o he p ac ical applicabili y o
he model. You aluable insigh s and eedback will play a signi ican ole in alida ing he e ec i eness
and applicabili y o his model.
Le 's begin ou discussion and explo e how his model can con ibu e o he imp o emen o p ojec
success a es.
A b ie summa y o he hi d pe son in e iewed. Tiago Miguel Mo ei a Gal ão, se es as an IT
p ojec manage a Ac i eBank, a di ision o G upo Banco Come cial Po uguês. Wi h a ocus on
managing p ojec s o mobile apps and websi es, Tiago o e sees he en i e p ojec li ecycle, om
business analysis o quali y es ing, wi h a keen eye o de ail and e iciency. His expe ise lies in
na iga ing he complexi ies o IT p ojec managemen , ensu ing success ul ou comes o each
endea o he unde akes.
2ND PART
Assuming he indi idual ead he bes p ac ice model.
[QUESTION] Based on you unde s anding o he bes p ac ice model p esen ed, do you ag ee ha he
implemen a ion o his model will ha e an impac on p ojec s, in pa icula inc easing he success a e?
I do hink i would be an imp o emen wi hin he p ac ices in p ojec managemen because I eel like
i we could like ca e mo e abou he knowledge sha ing pa and ha ing all he documen s in one place
o example o e e yone o jus o ead whene e hey wan ed o o o y o sha e knowledge h ough
some ac i i ies in he beginning o he p ojec i will be mo e help ul and he ou pu would be way
be e .
IF YES
[QUESTION] Could you please explain he posi i e aspec s o implemen ing his model in an
o ganiza ion? Speci ically, wha did you ind mos bene icial o liked he mos abou his model?
I eel like i could imp o e wo main a eas, a leas om wha I ead. One o hem would be o cou se
he ou pu ha I' e old you abou in he p e ious answe . Bu e e yone wi hin an o ganiza ion could
maybe y o handle a p ojec wi hin a opic ha has been wi h somebody else be o e because wi h
he knowledge sha ing, e e yone could ge access o knowledge o o he p oduc s, I hink. So i could
imp o e ha pa as well.