scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Learnings from Local Collaborative Transformations: Setting a Basis for a Sustainability Framework

Abstract

The complexity of the sustainability challenge demands for collaboration between different actors, be they governments, businesses, or grassroots movements, at all levels. Nevertheless, and according to previous research, many tensions and obstacles to partnership still exist and results are far from meaningful. By investigating potential synergies, our purpose is to define a sustainability framework to promote better collaboration between community-based initiatives and local governments, in the context of transformation. Specifically, the research aim presented in this paper is to harvest learnings from existing collaborative experiments at the municipal level. As a starting point and using exploratory literature review concerning areas like policy (e.g., public administration) or business and management research, we propose a ‘Compass for Collaborative Transformation’. This heuristic device can support the study of these sustainability experiments. We also introduce a method to map the governance imprint of these collaborations and to provide a ‘proxy’ of transformative efforts. We then present and discuss results from 71 surveyed cases happening in 16 countries in America and Europe, comparing distinctive frameworks involved. Finally, we consider the preconditions of a framework to improve these local collaborations—namely the capacity to support joint navigation through transformative efforts, facing high levels of uncertainty and complexity—and present ongoing efforts to codesign a new sustainability framework.

Read accessible full text

Learnings from Local Collaborative Transformations: Setting a Basis for a Sustainability Framework

Author: Macedo, Pedro,Huertas, Ana,Bottone, Cristiano,del Río, Juan,Hillary, Nicola,Brazzini, Tommaso,Wittmayer, Julia M.,Penha-Lopes, Gil
Publisher: MDPI
Year: 2020
Source: https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstream/10451/46253/1/Macedo_Sustainability_2020.pdf
sus ainabili y
A icle
Lea nings om Local Collabo a i e T ans o ma ions:
Se ing a Basis o a Sus ainabili y F amewo k
Ped o Macedo 1,* , Ana Hue as 2, C is iano Bo one 2, Juan del Río2, Nicola Hilla y 3,
Tommaso B azzini 2, Julia M. Wi maye 4and Gil Penha-Lopes 1
1
Cen e o Ecology, E olu ion and En i onmen al Changes, Faculdade de Ci
ê
ncias, Uni e sidade de Lisboa,
1749-016 Lisbon, Po ugal; [email p o ec ed]
2Municipali ies in T ansi ion P ojec , To nes TQ9 5HN, UK; [email p o ec ed]g (A.H.);
[email p o ec ed] (C.B.); [email p o ec ed]g (J.d.R.);
[email p o ec ed] (T.B.)
3T ansi ion Ne wo k, To nes TQ9 5HN, UK; [email p o ec ed]g
4Du ch Resea ch Ins i u e o T ansi ions, E asmus Uni e si y Ro e dam, 3062 PA Ro e dam,
The Ne he lands; [email p o ec ed].nl
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]; Tel.: +351-936061160
Recei ed: 16 Decembe 2019; Accep ed: 18 Janua y 2020; Published: 21 Janua y 2020


Abs ac :
The complexi y o he sus ainabili y challenge demands o collabo a ion be ween di e en
ac o s, be hey go e nmen s, businesses, o g ass oo s mo emen s, a all le els. Ne e heless,
and acco ding o p e ious esea ch, many ensions and obs acles o pa ne ship s ill exis and
esul s a e a om meaning ul. By in es iga ing po en ial syne gies, ou pu pose is o de ine a
sus ainabili y amewo k o p omo e be e collabo a ion be ween communi y-based ini ia i es and
local go e nmen s, in he con ex o ans o ma ion. Speci ically, he esea ch aim p esen ed in
his pape is o ha es lea nings om exis ing collabo a i e expe imen s a he municipal le el.
As a s a ing
poin and using explo a o y li e a u e e iew conce ning a eas like policy (e.g., public
adminis a ion) o business and managemen esea ch, we p opose a ‘Compass o Collabo a i e
T ans o ma ion’. This heu is ic de ice can suppo he s udy o hese sus ainabili y expe imen s.
We also in oduce a me hod o map he go e nance imp in o hese collabo a ions and o p o ide
a ‘p oxy’ o ans o ma i e e o s. We hen p esen and discuss esul s om 71 su eyed cases
happening in 16 coun ies in Ame ica and Eu ope, compa ing dis inc i e amewo ks in ol ed.
Finally, we conside he p econdi ions o a amewo k o imp o e hese local collabo a ions—namely
he capaci y o suppo join na iga ion h ough ans o ma i e e o s, acing high le els o unce ain y
and complexi y—and p esen ongoing e o s o codesign a new sus ainabili y amewo k.
Keywo ds:
collabo a ion; go e nance; amewo k; local go e nmen ; communi y-based ini ia i e;
sus ainabili y; ans o ma ion
1. In oduc ion
The easons behind he need o a deep change in ou socie ies a e well i e a ed and include
clima e change and o he consequences o c ossing plane a y bounda ies, e.g., [
1
]. Ne e heless, like
o he s, e.g., [
2
] (p. 2), we conside ha acing limi s, such as plane a y bounda ies, is an oppo uni y o
eimagine socie y and ha we should emb ace ans o ma ion as ou wa chwo d.
The complexi y o his challenge demands o collabo a ion be ween di e en o ganiza ions, be
hey s a es, businesses, o ci il socie y [
3
], ansla ing in o he capaci y o i s membe s o collec i ely
se and pu sue sha ed goals [
4
]. This collabo a ion is expec ed o happen ac oss le els [
5
] (p. 85) wi h
he local con ex becoming an e ec i e space o engaging ci izens and o ganiza ions since hey a e
di ec ly a ec ed by decisions and he impac o (in)ac ion.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795; doi:10.3390/su12030795 www.mdpi.com/jou nal/sus ainabili y
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 2 o 24
In ac , a g owing ield o ans o ma ion esea ch is dedica ing i s e o s o sus ainabili y
challenges [
6
–
8
]. While, Pa e son and colleagues [
9
] conclude ha he e is he need o “place
go e nance and poli ics a he cen e o esea ch on ans o ma ions owa ds sus ainabili y,” Abson and
colleagues [
10
] accen ua e he u gency o “iden i y solu ion-o ien ed app oaches o ans o ma ional
change” also [
11
]. The p esen esea ch ies o ace hese challenges by ocusing on local collabo a i e
ans o ma ions ha migh be he basis o an inno a i e p ocess leading o a mo e sus ainable socie y.
The esea ch aim is o de elop p ac ical knowledge a he han epis emic, in a ph onesis app oach [
12
].
We y o ace he gene al ques ion: How can we gene a e, in p ac ice, local ac ion ha can
po en ially c ea e global posi i e ans o ma ion in an e ec i e and e icien way? Su ely many
solu ions ha e al eady been explo ed and he e is no one single answe . Wha (possibly) makes his
esea ch dis inc is he s a ing poin : We assume ha a g ea po en ial o ans o ma ion es s in he
join ac ion be ween local au ho i ies and ci il socie y. Ou app oach is o concep ualize and empi ically
explo e he dynamic in e ac ions be ween hese local ac o s in he con ex s hey a e embedded [13].
The assumed esea ch ques ion is he e o e how o p omo e syne gies be ween local go e nmen s
and communi y-based ini ia i es in hei pu sui s o (local) sus ainabili y. A key ea u e is ha i is no
looking o a new ‘ ecipe’ o p omo ing local collabo a ions bu ins ead a sus ainabili y amewo k
ha can help exis ing collabo a ions o os e hei ans o ma i e impac .
A pa icipa o y ac ion esea ch app oach was decided, since i has p o en o be aluable
in suppo ing sus ainabili y and ans o ma i e e o s a local le el by mixing he p oduc ion o
knowledge and socie al ac ion [14].
The esea ch de eloped included he c ea ion o an assessmen ool o local ans o ma i e
collabo a ions, mapping and assessing 71 impac ul collabo a i e cases in 16 coun ies, co-designing
an ag eed amewo k, es ing and e ining in pilo s, p omo ing a communi y o p ac ice and ou each.
In his pape we s a by add essing he collabo a i e dynamics be ween local o ganiza ions (ou
uni o analyses), p oposing a ‘Compass o Collabo a i e T ans o ma ion’ as an assessmen ool (nex
sec ion). Unde ‘me hods’ we p esen he esea ch design and he me hods used in ha es ing and
analyzing he exis en 71 cases (case s udy esea ch). The lea nings om he c oss-case analysis o he
mul i-ac o go e nance ne wo ks a e p esen ed in he ollowing sec ion (‘ esul s’). In ‘discussion’ we
a i e a he p oposi ions o a sus ainabili y amewo k o imp o e hese local collabo a ions and
p esen he ongoing e o s o codesign and es a new ins umen o ac i a e syne gies. Finally, in
‘conclusions,’ we summa ize he scien i ic con ibu ions o his pape .
2. Local T ans o ma i e Collabo a ions
Collabo a ion is a he hea o na u al e olu ion [
15
], including ha o humans, and is conside ed
a posi i e ea u e in cul u es ac oss he wo ld wi hou known excep ion [
16
], e en hough i migh
be losing g ound owa ds compe i ion [
17
]. Consequen ly, collabo a ion cap u es he a en ion o
many esea ch ields, om game heo y [
18
] o s a egic managemen [
19
], and is well s udied unde
public adminis a ion [
20
]. Policy s udies ha e shown ha collabo a ion can mi iga e con lic , he e o e
enabling collec i e ac ion [
21
]. Pa ne ships, as collabo a i e a angemen s, can also p oduce and
ca alyze syne gies by way o pooling esou ces and skills [22].
Howe e , we should also men ion ha collabo a ion is no panacea o ad ance go e nance [
23
].
As esea ch showed ex ensi ely, collabo a ions a e no easy asks; hey ake ime, e o , and esou ces,
equi e wo king wi h complex human in e ac ions a ound powe ela ions, and do no necessa ily
lead o syne gies and ad an ages [
3
,
24
]. They a e inhe en ly pa adoxical [
3
] and con ibu ions o
sus ainabili y lack e idence [25].
Se e al ac o s can in luence he esul s o collabo a ions and ha e been epo ed in li e a u e.
In an e o o sys ema ize hese ac o s a ‘Compass o Collabo a i e T ans o ma ion’ is p oposed
(Figu e 1). This heu is ic was used in he esea ch p ocess as an assessmen amewo k o exis ing
expe iences o ans o ma i e collabo a ion be ween local o ganiza ions.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 3 o 24
Sus ainabili y 2020, 12, 795 3 o 28
(Figu e 1). This heu is ic was used in he esea ch p ocess as an assessmen amewo k o exis ing
expe iences o ans o ma i e collabo a ion be ween local o ganiza ions.
Figu e 1. Wha makes a success ul ans o ma i e collabo a ion? The ‘Compass o Collabo a i e
T ans o ma ion’ allows a mul idimensional assessmen o collabo a ions be ween local go e nmen s
and communi y-based ini ia i es, in e ms o ans o ma ion owa ds sus ainabili y. The g een ci cles
ela e p ima ily o he quali y o he p ocess (coc ea ion) and ela ionships es ablished (mu ual
suppo ) and he yellows o ou comes, including conc e e ou pu s (cop oduc ion) and mo e in angible
impac s (open inno a ion).
The i s p oposi ion ad oca es ha local ins i u ions should p omo e he coc ea ion o ini ia i es
(‘doing i oge he ’), by making use o hei collec i e in elligence. This can in ol e p ocesses o
collabo a i e en isioning, analyzing scena ios, and se ing pa hways [26–28]. Discussing and
ag eeing on a sha ed unde s anding and analyses o he p oblem, as well as long- e m commi men s,
a e conside ed c i ical [29]. T ansi ion managemen , o ins ance, ocuses on he ole o a eam o
leade s in collabo a i e isioning and s ee ing o expe imen s, combined wi h a e lexi e app oach
ha includes moni o ing, e alua ing, and lea ning [30–33]. Clea ly de ining complemen a y oles
and aking join decisions a e also ac o s p esen in e ec i e join implemen a ion p ocesses. These
e o s a e expec ed o ein o ce legi imacy [34], especially i aspec s o inclusion, ep esen a i eness,
anspa ency, and accoun abili y a e conside ed.
The second p oposi ion highligh s he need o mu ual suppo wi h ecip oci y in mind (‘win-
win si ua ion’), leading o c oss- e iliza ion, ul illing ela ionships, and empowe men . Key
condi ions o ui ul collabo a ions a e he commi men o wo k oge he and he de elopmen o
us [35]. S udies also show ha unding can be impo an bu no as much as c ea ing spaces o
pe manen , endu ing, s uc u ed, and in e pe sonal dialogue [36,37]. A sui able le el o bu eauc acy
and o mali y is also c i ical o educe he isk o phenomena like ‘coe ci e isomo phism’ [38], in
which communi y-based ini ia i es a e p essu ed o con o m o equi emen s and expec a ions o
incumben egimes (e.g., o adop a legal s uc u e o i wi hin he pa ame e s o he poli ical
agenda). In gene al, sha ing goods and se ices o in o ma ion and knowledge (e.g., wo-way
aining), and also c oss ma ke ing (p omo ing and pa icipa ing in each o he ’s ac i i ies), a e ac o s
ha can con ibu e posi i ely. Fai ness should be p omo ed by equally sha ing isks, e o s, and
bene i s.
Figu e 1.
Wha makes a success ul ans o ma i e collabo a ion? The ‘Compass o Collabo a i e
T ans o ma ion’ allows a mul idimensional assessmen o collabo a ions be ween local go e nmen s
and communi y-based ini ia i es, in e ms o ans o ma ion owa ds sus ainabili y. The g een ci cles
ela e p ima ily o he quali y o he p ocess (coc ea ion) and ela ionships es ablished (mu ual suppo )
and he yellows o ou comes, including conc e e ou pu s (cop oduc ion) and mo e in angible impac s
(open inno a ion).
The i s p oposi ion ad oca es ha local ins i u ions should p omo e he coc ea ion o ini ia i es
(‘doing i oge he ’), by making use o hei collec i e in elligence. This can in ol e p ocesses o
collabo a i e en isioning, analyzing scena ios, and se ing pa hways [
26
–
28
]. Discussing and ag eeing
on a sha ed unde s anding and analyses o he p oblem, as well as long- e m commi men s, a e
conside ed c i ical [
29
]. T ansi ion managemen , o ins ance, ocuses on he ole o a eam o leade s in
collabo a i e isioning and s ee ing o expe imen s, combined wi h a e lexi e app oach ha includes
moni o ing, e alua ing, and lea ning [
30
–
33
]. Clea ly de ining complemen a y oles and aking join
decisions a e also ac o s p esen in e ec i e join implemen a ion p ocesses. These e o s a e expec ed
o ein o ce legi imacy [
34
], especially i aspec s o inclusion, ep esen a i eness, anspa ency, and
accoun abili y a e conside ed.
The second p oposi ion highligh s he need o mu ual suppo wi h ecip oci y in mind (‘win-win
si ua ion’), leading o c oss- e iliza ion, ul illing ela ionships, and empowe men . Key condi ions
o ui ul collabo a ions a e he commi men o wo k oge he and he de elopmen o us [
35
].
S udies also show ha unding can be impo an bu no as much as c ea ing spaces o pe manen ,
endu ing, s uc u ed, and in e pe sonal dialogue [
36
,
37
]. A sui able le el o bu eauc acy and
o mali y is also c i ical o educe he isk o phenomena like ‘coe ci e isomo phism’ [
38
], in which
communi y-based ini ia i es a e p essu ed o con o m o equi emen s and expec a ions o incumben
egimes (e.g., o adop a legal s uc u e o i wi hin he pa ame e s o he poli ical agenda). In gene al,
sha ing goods and se ices o in o ma ion and knowledge (e.g., wo-way aining), and also c oss
ma ke ing (p omo ing and pa icipa ing in each o he ’s ac i i ies), a e ac o s ha can con ibu e
posi i ely. Fai ness should be p omo ed by equally sha ing isks, e o s, and bene i s.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 4 o 24
The hi d p oposi ion ocuses on cop oduc ion, namely he join deli e y o goods and se ices
aiming a ca ing o people and he plane , hus p omo ing ‘communi y esilience’ [
39
]. The cop oduc ion
o (hope ully ans o ma i e) public se ices may be he decisi e s ep in a collabo a ion be ween
local go e nmen s and g ass oo s mo emen s. Bo ai d [
40
] concluded ha suppo ing cop oduc ion
should be he “new public se ice e hos.” In pa icula , he cop oduc ion o goods and se ices by
di e en ac o s o ganized in o polycen ic sys ems can be “c ucial o achie ing highe le els o wel a e
in de eloping coun ies, pa icula ly o hose who a e poo ” [
41
]. Some ad ances ha e occu ed,
especially in ‘communi y ene gy’ [
42
] and ‘ecosys em s ewa dship’ [
43
]. Cop oduc ion migh include
he p o ision o well-being and pe sonal g ow h (e.g., lea ning oppo uni ies, communi y engagemen );
‘g een’ economy (e.g., en ep eneu ship, localiza ion, ci cula i y); ib an cul u e (e.g., local he i age,
c ea i i y); social capi al (e.g., ex en o ne wo ks, densi y o ela ionships); jus ice and equi y (e.g.,
delibe a e edis ibu i e e o s, inclusion); ecological es o a ion; o he so s o clima e mi iga ion
and adap a ion.
Finally, he ou h p oposi ion add esses he need o open inno a ion, making anspa en
and explici wha is o be ans o med and o whom, and p omo ing he des abiliza ion o exis ing
egimes. The idea o ‘delibe a e dis up ion’ is a eac ion o he u gency o ackling sus ainabili y
issues and he need o adical and ‘deep’ change, e.g., [
44
–
46
]. Se e al heo ies ha e been p oposed
o ame he mo e in angible ou comes, anging om ans o ma i e social inno a ion [
47
], social
lea ning [
48
], p ac ices heo y [
49
], echnological inno a ion sys ems [
50
], na a i es o change [
51
,
52
],
ins i u ionaliza ion [
53
], cul u al change [
54
], ne wo ked go e nance [
55
], e c. These ollow om
(some imes) opposing on ologies [
56
]. He e he e m ‘open inno a ion’ is used o emphasize he
impo ance o using in e nal and ex e nal ideas in hese collabo a ions [57].
3. Me hods
By in es iga ing he po en ial syne gies be ween local o ganiza ions, ou pu pose is o ind a
amewo k o p omo e a be e collabo a ion be ween communi y-based ini ia i es (CBIs) and local
go e nmen s (LGs), in he con ex o ans o ma ion.
A pa icipa o y ac ion esea ch p ocess was chosen since he main in en ion is o suppo
p ac i ione s in enhancing hei impac by de eloping p ac ical solu ions [
58
,
59
]. These kinds o
p ocesses a e pa icula ly help ul in he con ex o sus ainabili y— esea che s engage in hei social
esponsibili y and assume he oles o change agen s, knowledge b oke s, (sel ) e lec i e scien is s, and
p ocess acili a o s [60].
A collabo a i e inqui y was se in ol ing he T ansi ion mo emen and he Uni e si y o Lisbon,
also ancho ed by hei ole wi hin ECOLISE (Eu opean Ne wo k o Communi y-Led Ini ia i es on
Clima e Change and Sus ainabili y). The wo k is in eg a ed in he p ojec ‘Municipali ies in T ansi ion,’
s a ed in 2017.
The T ansi ion mo emen is conside ed one o he mos signi ican examples o local communi ies
leading he way o a pos -ca bon socie y, a leas in Eu ope [
61
–
63
]. These ini ia i es a e sp ead
wo ld-wide and demons a e a dis inc i e openness o collabo a ions [
64
]. They a e, he e o e,
a pe inen and sui able s a ing poin o he p esen esea ch ( ha does no es ic i sel o he
T ansi ion mo emen ), p o iding an expe imen al space wi h ans o ma ional ambi ion [
65
] (p. 6).
Ne e heless, a bias owa d Wes e n coun ies migh be expec ed. I should also be conside ed ha
hese expe imen s do no always e lec he di e si y o he communi ies in which hey h i e [
66
,
67
],
despi e hei e o s on inclusi i y [61].
Resea ch included codesigning a amewo k ha could be used o boos he ans o ma i e each
o coope a ion be ween local ac o s o sus ainabili y and es ing and e ining he amewo k in pilo s.
The expe imen a ion p ocess is p esen ed elsewhe e.
Fo he codesign we used a mul i-me hod app oach including li e a u e e iew, an explo a i e
analysis o 71 su eyed cases o local o egional collabo a ions happening in 16 coun ies in Ame ica
and Eu ope, and ansdisciplina y co-design sessions.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 5 o 24
Wi h he aim o lea ning om he exis ing cases o ans o ma i e collabo a ion a local le el, a wo
phase esea ch was de eloped: (1) Gene al ha es ing by obse a ion and ques ionnai es ( o inc ease
each and ge quan i a i e da a); a snowball sampling was used s a ing om he T ansi ion mo emen ;
and (2) in-dep h s udy o eigh selec ed cases using obse a ion and semi-s uc u ed in e iews o
main s akeholde s ( o ge de ailed in o ma ion and di e en poin s o iew).
In phase 1, a snowball sampling was used s a ing om he lis o T ansi ion Hubs (na ional
o egional ne wo ks wi hin he T ansi ion mo emen ) and sp eading o T ansi ion ini ia i es and
co esponden ne wo ks o p ac i ione s, in a way o make good use o hei esou ces and knowledge.
Da a was collec ed by people ha pa icipa ed in o obse ed cases whe e LGs we e in ol ed in
exempla y and s able collabo a i e e o s wi h CBIs. Da a collec o s and cases we e no necessa ily
linked o he T ansi ion mo emen .
Da a was collec ed h ough ques ionnai es (p o ided online) and ela ed p ima ily o he dynamics
be ween ac o s in ol ed (ou uni o analysis), including go e nance models and ools used o os e
collabo a ion. In phase 2, in e iews we e pe o med o case pa icipan s (including one om he LG,
one om he CBI, and a hi d pe son no in ol ed in he case managemen , possibly a bene icia y o
someone pa icipa ing in he ac i i ies).
We used he ‘Compass o Collabo a i e T ans o ma ion’ (Figu e 1) as an analy ical amewo k
o he in e p e a ion o esul s. In o de o examine he go e nance imp in o he local ans o ma i e
collabo a ions we used a ool called ‘Ene gy Func ion’ [
68
], de eloped in I aly. Gi ing his me hodology,
he occu ing p ocesses can be mapped acco ding o he ac o s in ol ed and ans o ma i e ac ions
de eloped in each case.
The Ac o s’ ca ego ies used a e:
•
Municipali y, poli ical le el: Who ins i u ionally con ibu es o de ining policies, e.g., council,
commissions, pa ies
•
Municipali y, o ganiza ional s uc u e: Technicians and o he ci il se an s esponsible o
pe o ming municipal unc ions
•Con olled en i ies: En i ies ha a e in some way con olled by he municipali y
•Supplie s: Public and p i a e supplie s o he municipali y
•
O ganiza ions: Economic, social, and cul u al o ganiza ions, p o i and non-p o i (e.g., business,
schools, en i onmen al o ganiza ions)
•Public: Families and ci izens
•
Ne wo ks: O he municipali ies and ac o s ou side he e i o y (e.g., o he municipali ies, le els
o go e nmen , pa ne s in in e na ional ne wo ks)
And he Ac ions’ ca ego ies:
•Vision: Ac ions and p ocesses ha end o c ea e a ision
•
O ganiza ion: Ac ions and p ocesses ha end o c ea e o modi y he go e nance, p ocedu es,
oles, and ela ed issues (e.g., c ea ing a new o ice o deal wi h sus ainabili y issues)
•
Planning: Ac ionsandp ocesses ha end oc ea eaplan(e.g.,se inggoals,policiesin eg a ions,budge s)
•Technical aspec s: Ac ions ha modi y he sys em h ough echnology
•
Rela ions: Ac ions and p ocesses ha wan o c ea e o imp o e ela ionships, namely ac ing on
human and social aspec s
•
Cul u al change: Ac ions and p ocesses ha aim o lead o a ‘pa adigm shi ’ (including
communica ion and educa ional ac i i ies)
•
Ne wo king: Ac ions and p ocesses ha aim o c ea e s able connec ions and compa isons
(e.g., benchma king)
The ‘Ene gy Func ion’ ool is pa o a amewo k o dealing wi h he complex sus ainabili y
challenge and was one o he cases s udied in his esea ch.

Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 6 o 24
A e se ing he p econdi ions o a sus ainabili y amewo k ha could enhance syne gies,
a codesign p ocess was de eloped using socioc a ic echniques wi hin he s ee ing g oup (people om
T ansi ion Hubs and esea che om he Uni e si y o Lisbon) and in o ma ion om he case s udies
and li e a u e.
4. Resul s
Wha can we lea n om exis ing collabo a i e expe imen s a he municipal le el? We will now
p esen he esea ch de eloped o answe his ques ion.
Exempla y cases o local ans o ma ion we e collec ed h ough an online su ey sen o T ansi ion
Hubs in he beginning o July 2017. By he beginning o Oc obe 2017, 71 cases had been collec ed (see
Appendix A), cu en ly ac i e in 16 coun ies: Belgium, B azil, Chile, Colombia, Denma k, F ance,
Ge many, Hunga y, I aly, Mexico, Ne he lands, Po ugal, Spain, Sweden, Uni ed Kingdom, and Uni ed
S a es. Mos o he cases we e “well-es ablished and unning” (40), while some we e s ill in design
s age (10) o had jus s a ed (21).
Da a was collec ed mainly by people connec ed wi h he Hubs (63%) and/o T ansi ion ini ia i es
(48%). Mos o hem s a e ha hey could be pe cei ed as neu al o he cases, bu some deg ee o bias
is expec ed o occu .
The 71 cases collec ed we e mos ly loca ed in u ban con ex (a ound h ee-qua e s) wi h popula ion
anging om 200 o 12,000,000 ( equen ly be ween 1000 and 40,000). The main a ea o ac i i y (mul iple
choice possible) was aising awa eness (77%). Cases also mos ly dedica ed hemsel es (>50%) o ood
and ag icul u e; educa ion; pa icipa o y democ acy; and planning and communi y wo k (Figu e 2).
Rela ing o bene icia ies, he cases we e mos ly aimed a a gene al public (65%), ollowed by (44–32%)
adul s, amilies, elde s, young adul s, eenage s, and child en. Cases we e also asked abou assessmen
ela ing some o he main domains o he Compass (Figu e 3).
Sus ainabili y 2020, 12, 795 6 o 28
4. Resul s
Wha can we lea n om exis ing collabo a i e expe imen s a he municipal le el? We will now
p esen he esea ch de eloped o answe his ques ion.
Exempla y cases o local ans o ma ion we e collec ed h ough an online su ey sen o
T ansi ion Hubs in he beginning o July 2017. By he beginning o Oc obe 2017, 71 cases had been
collec ed (see Appendix A), cu en ly ac i e in 16 coun ies: Belgium, B azil, Chile, Colombia,
Denma k, F ance, Ge many, Hunga y, I aly, Mexico, Ne he lands, Po ugal, Spain, Sweden, Uni ed
Kingdom, and Uni ed S a es. Mos o he cases we e “well-es ablished and unning” (40), while some
we e s ill in design s age (10) o had jus s a ed (21).
Da a was collec ed mainly by people connec ed wi h he Hubs (63%) and/o T ansi ion
ini ia i es (48%). Mos o hem s a e ha hey could be pe cei ed as neu al o he cases, bu some
deg ee o bias is expec ed o occu .
The 71 cases collec ed we e mos ly loca ed in u ban con ex (a ound h ee-qua e s) wi h
popula ion anging om 200 o 12,000,000 ( equen ly be ween 1000 and 40,000). The main a ea o
ac i i y (mul iple choice possible) was aising awa eness (77%). Cases also mos ly dedica ed
hemsel es (>50%) o ood and ag icul u e; educa ion; pa icipa o y democ acy; and planning and
communi y wo k (Figu e 2). Rela ing o bene icia ies, he cases we e mos ly aimed a a gene al public
(65%), ollowed by (44%–32%) adul s, amilies, elde s, young adul s, eenage s, and child en. Cases
we e also asked abou assessmen ela ing some o he main domains o he Compass (Figu e 3).
Figu e 2. Resul s om he su ey—main subjec s ha he case s udies ocus on (n = 71).
Figu e 2. Resul s om he su ey—main subjec s ha he case s udies ocus on (n =71).
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 7 o 24
Sus ainabili y 2020, 12, 795 7 o 28
Figu e 3. Resul s om he su ey—answe s o he ques ion: “How much do you ag ee wi h he
ollowing s a emen s?” (1 = Fully disag ee; 5 = Fully ag ee).
Acco ding o he da a collec o s, cases exhibi a signi ican deg ee o inno a ion and coope a ion
be ween ac o s (Figu e 3). This was expec ed since hese we e p e equisi es o he selec ion. Cases
a e mos ly ocused in changing li es yles and p omo ing jus ice.
In e ms o clima e change mi iga ion and adap a ion, he ini ia i es s a ed ha hei
con ibu ions we e mainly by ins i u ional and beha io al change o ein o cemen , ollowed by
p oducing local and/o o ganic ood and p omo ing heal hy and sus ainable die s, p e en ing was e
and ecycling (ci cula economy), p omo ing sus ainable mobili y (cycling, public anspo , elec ic
and sha ed ca s), c ea ing g een in as uc u es, and gene a ing hea and elec ici y om enewable
sou ces (Figu e 4).
Figu e 4. Resul s om he su ey—Con ibu ions o clima e change mi iga ion and adap a ion (n = 71).
Cases su eyed we e qui e di e se, including in hei go e nance sys ems. They spanned om
g ass oo s eco-neighbo hoods in São Paulo o a well-s uc u ed ans o ma ion ini ia i e a ci y le el
in D esden wi h go e nmen al suppo , an eco illage in Colombia managed by women o
coope a i es o p oduce ene gy and p omo e local ood. Some cases ocused on he collabo a i e
p omo ion o conc e e ac i i ies o opics (e.g., cycling, ci cula economy, u ban ag icul u e) o mo e
spi i ual expe iences (e.g., inne ansi ion).
Figu e 3.
Resul s om he su ey—answe s o he ques ion: “How much do you ag ee wi h he
ollowing s a emen s?” (1 =Fully disag ee; 5 =Fully ag ee).
Acco ding o he da a collec o s, cases exhibi a signi ican deg ee o inno a ion and coope a ion
be ween ac o s (Figu e 3). This was expec ed since hese we e p e equisi es o he selec ion. Cases a e
mos ly ocused in changing li es yles and p omo ing jus ice.
In e ms o clima e change mi iga ion and adap a ion, he ini ia i es s a ed ha hei con ibu ions
we e mainly by ins i u ional and beha io al change o ein o cemen , ollowed by p oducing local
and/o o ganic ood and p omo ing heal hy and sus ainable die s, p e en ing was e and ecycling
(ci cula economy), p omo ing sus ainable mobili y (cycling, public anspo , elec ic and sha ed ca s),
c ea ing g een in as uc u es, and gene a ing hea and elec ici y om enewable sou ces (Figu e 4).
Sus ainabili y 2020, 12, 795 7 o 28
Figu e 3. Resul s om he su ey—answe s o he ques ion: “How much do you ag ee wi h he
ollowing s a emen s?” (1 = Fully disag ee; 5 = Fully ag ee).
Acco ding o he da a collec o s, cases exhibi a signi ican deg ee o inno a ion and coope a ion
be ween ac o s (Figu e 3). This was expec ed since hese we e p e equisi es o he selec ion. Cases
a e mos ly ocused in changing li es yles and p omo ing jus ice.
In e ms o clima e change mi iga ion and adap a ion, he ini ia i es s a ed ha hei
con ibu ions we e mainly by ins i u ional and beha io al change o ein o cemen , ollowed by
p oducing local and/o o ganic ood and p omo ing heal hy and sus ainable die s, p e en ing was e
and ecycling (ci cula economy), p omo ing sus ainable mobili y (cycling, public anspo , elec ic
and sha ed ca s), c ea ing g een in as uc u es, and gene a ing hea and elec ici y om enewable
sou ces (Figu e 4).
Figu e 4. Resul s om he su ey—Con ibu ions o clima e change mi iga ion and adap a ion (n = 71).
Cases su eyed we e qui e di e se, including in hei go e nance sys ems. They spanned om
g ass oo s eco-neighbo hoods in São Paulo o a well-s uc u ed ans o ma ion ini ia i e a ci y le el
in D esden wi h go e nmen al suppo , an eco illage in Colombia managed by women o
coope a i es o p oduce ene gy and p omo e local ood. Some cases ocused on he collabo a i e
p omo ion o conc e e ac i i ies o opics (e.g., cycling, ci cula economy, u ban ag icul u e) o mo e
spi i ual expe iences (e.g., inne ansi ion).
Figu e 4.
Resul s om he su ey—Con ibu ions o clima e change mi iga ion and adap a ion (n =71).
Cases su eyed we e qui e di e se, including in hei go e nance sys ems. They spanned om
g ass oo s eco-neighbo hoods in S
ã
o Paulo o a well-s uc u ed ans o ma ion ini ia i e a ci y le el in
D esden wi h go e nmen al suppo , an eco illage in Colombia managed by women o coope a i es o
p oduce ene gy and p omo e local ood. Some cases ocused on he collabo a i e p omo ion o conc e e
ac i i ies o opics (e.g., cycling, ci cula economy, u ban ag icul u e) o mo e spi i ual expe iences
(e.g., inne ansi ion).
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 8 o 24
In mos o he cases i was possible o iden i y some p og essi eness in he way ha local
go e nmen s and ci il socie y wo k oge he wi h a ans o ma i e aim. Besides pa ne ships, spaces
o dialogue and lea ning, ac ion g oups a e qui e common (‘local inno a ion commi ee,’ ‘neighbo hood
en i onmen al commi ee,’ ‘neighbo hood assemblies,’ ‘schools o li e,’ ‘li ing class ooms,’ ‘ u u e ci y
eam’) as well as he c ea ion o ne wo ks connec ing change agen s.
Some o he ools used o p omo e ans o ma i e collabo a ion include sha ing land and o he
esou ces, demons a i e cen e s, cowo king spaces, con e gence e en s, social cu encies, dis ibu ion
o small g an s, sha ed social media pla o ms, e hnog aphy app oaches, communi a ian managemen
o public spaces, e c. Managemen ools like D agon D eaming, Socioc acy, Theo y U and Non iolen
Communica ion a e also used.
Mos o he cases (73%) ha e some connec ion o he T ansi ion mo emen and se e al ac i e
collabo a ions wi h municipali ies we e p esen ed. Mos o he cases also epo ed ha hey belonged
o some local, egional, na ional, o in e na ional ne wo k (e.g., Co enan o Mayo s), while a
ew c ea ed hei own ne wo ks. Funding comes om municipali ies, p i a e sec o , coope a i es,
non-go e nmen al o ganiza ions, c owd unding and use s, besides o he na ional and in e na ional
le els (e.g., Eu opean Union).
The mapping o ac o s and ac ions in ol ed o each case is p esen ed in Table 1and was p oduced
h ough con en analyses o he in o ma ion collec ed.
Table 1.
Mapping o he collec ed cases (n =71) acco ding o ac o s and ac ions in ol ed. Highe
alues ha e been lagged in bold. Colo ed cells a e conside ed ‘le e age poin s.’ Adap ed om [68].
Ac o s Ca ego ies
Ac ions
Ca ego ies
Municipali y
Poli ical
Municip.
O ganiza ion
Con olled
En i ies Supplie s O ganiza ions Public Ne wo ks
Vision 24 18 2 1 35 24 6
O ganiza ion 46 46 6 2 55 46 4
Planning 26 22 2 1 32 22 6
Technical aspec s 15 19 4 2 34 25 3
Rela ions 12 12 1 0 33 33 0
Cul u al change 35 36 5 1 62 63 8
Ne wo king 31 26 4 1 39 28 32
The empi ical obse a ion o he I alian expe ience in using he ‘Ene gy Func ion’ shows ha
he c ucial ac o s leading o eal changes in he way a communi y o ganizes i sel a e new isions
de eloped a he poli ical le el, planning occu ing a he municipali ies’ o ganiza ion le el, and a
cul u al change a he public le el. In he g id (Table 1) hose cells ha e a ‘highe ’ alue (colo ed
salmon). A second g oup o ‘key’ cells (colo ed o ange) a e conside ed as o he ac i a ion a eas wi h a
high po en ial o change. Fo example, i is assumed ha when o ganiza ions de elop a new ision,
change hei cul u e, and plan acco dingly we can obse e an e olu ion in he communi y.
We can conclude ha appa en ly he ac o s ha a e mo e ac i ely in ol ed in he cases (Figu e 5)
a e o ganiza ions and he gene al public, ollowed by local go e nmen s. Con olled en i ies and
supplie s a e no usually men ioned which can demons a e ha ini ia i es like g een p ocu emen
o li e-cycle assessmen s a e a e. O en, hese con olled en i ies manage c i ical sec o s ela ing o
sus ainabili y, like wa e , was e, o ene gy.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 9 o 24
Sus ainabili y 2020, 12, 795 9 o 28
Figu e 5. F equency o ac o s’ in ol emen in case s udies, by ac ions’ ca ego y.
Cul u al change and new go e nance schemes (in ol ing many ac o s) a e he kind o goals
mos o en pu sued, ollowed by ne wo king ac i i ies (Figu e 6). Ca ing o ela ions looks like a less
de eloped a ea o wo k. Visioning and planning can also be conside ed in ela i e de ici , aking in o
accoun he le e age powe a ibu ed o hese ac i i ies.
Figu e 6. Rela i e equency o ac ions in case s udies.
A ‘g id sco e’ was p oduced o each case by coun ing he numbe o illed cells. A ac o o 3
was applied o o ange cells and 5 o salmon (‘le e age cells’). The sco e a ies be ween 6 and 59
(a e age = 26), o a maximum alue o 73 (see Appendix A). This sco e, we could a gue, can be
conside ed a p oxy o he deg ee o ans o ma i e e o s happening in he communi y.
A mul i a ia e analysis was pe o med bu i did no allow o p o ide clea conclusions abou
possible case clus e s. We should no o ge o men ion ha lowe alues can co espond o cases
Figu e 5. F equency o ac o s’ in ol emen in case s udies, by ac ions’ ca ego y.
Cul u al change and new go e nance schemes (in ol ing many ac o s) a e he kind o goals mos
o en pu sued, ollowed by ne wo king ac i i ies (Figu e 6). Ca ing o ela ions looks like a less
de eloped a ea o wo k. Visioning and planning can also be conside ed in ela i e de ici , aking in o
accoun he le e age powe a ibu ed o hese ac i i ies.
Sus ainabili y 2020, 12, 795 9 o 28
Figu e 5. F equency o ac o s’ in ol emen in case s udies, by ac ions’ ca ego y.
Cul u al change and new go e nance schemes (in ol ing many ac o s) a e he kind o goals
mos o en pu sued, ollowed by ne wo king ac i i ies (Figu e 6). Ca ing o ela ions looks like a less
de eloped a ea o wo k. Visioning and planning can also be conside ed in ela i e de ici , aking in o
accoun he le e age powe a ibu ed o hese ac i i ies.
Figu e 6. Rela i e equency o ac ions in case s udies.
A ‘g id sco e’ was p oduced o each case by coun ing he numbe o illed cells. A ac o o 3
was applied o o ange cells and 5 o salmon (‘le e age cells’). The sco e a ies be ween 6 and 59
(a e age = 26), o a maximum alue o 73 (see Appendix A). This sco e, we could a gue, can be
conside ed a p oxy o he deg ee o ans o ma i e e o s happening in he communi y.
A mul i a ia e analysis was pe o med bu i did no allow o p o ide clea conclusions abou
possible case clus e s. We should no o ge o men ion ha lowe alues can co espond o cases
Figu e 6. Rela i e equency o ac ions in case s udies.
A ‘g id sco e’ was p oduced o each case by coun ing he numbe o illed cells. A ac o o
3 was applied o o ange cells and 5 o salmon (‘le e age cells’). The sco e a ies be ween 6 and 59
(
a e age =26
), o a maximum alue o 73 (see Appendix A). This sco e, we could a gue, can be
conside ed a p oxy o he deg ee o ans o ma i e e o s happening in he communi y.
A mul i a ia e analysis was pe o med bu i did no allow o p o ide clea conclusions abou
possible case clus e s. We should no o ge o men ion ha lowe alues can co espond o cases
whe e insu icien in o ma ion is a ailable and no necessa ily cases wi h smalle impac . The e o e, in
his con ex , i should no be conside ed a ‘ ank.’
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 16 o 24
Table A1. Con .
Name o he Case S udy Coun y Loca ion G id
Sco e Summa y
Ene gy Func ion I aly
Emilia
Romagna
Region
19
De elopmen o a heo e ical and ope a i e amewo k
o add ess “sus ainabili y and esilience” a local
go e nmen le el in a sys emic way.
Li o no I aly Li o no (Ci y) 22
Eme ging new ela ionship be ween local go e nmen
and ci izens sea ching o new me hodologies and ools
o de elop and h i e.
La Coope-Comunidad de
In e cambio Ecológico y
Solida io
Mexico Que é a o 24 A ecen coope a i e-communi y dedica ed o he local
ood sys em.
Asociacion P ojungapeo:
JET (Jungapeo en
T ansición)
Mexico Jungapeo,
Michoacán40
An ongoing communi y p ojec seeking an in eg al local
de elopmen .
Bacala en ansición Mexico Bacala ,
Quin ana Roo 21 Wo king oge he o p o ec he lagoon o Bacala and
he communi ies ha li e he e.
El I aca e Mexico Tepoz lán,
Mo elos 19
T ansi ion Reconomy p ojec based in Tepoz lan se led
as a hink ank lab o helping ood ga dening,
pe macul u e and educa ional p ojec s.
A chi ec u e o
sus ainabili y Mexico Guadalaja a
Jalisco 18
Social en e p ise o ien ed o sus ainable a chi ec u e and
dissemina ion o ools o esilience.
Ach e hoekse G oene
Ene gie Maa schappij
(Ach e hoek G een Ene gy
Coope a i e—AGEM)
The
Ne he lands
Ach e hoek
( egion) 29 Regional ene gy coope a i e owned and managed by
municipali ies.
Buu onds
Dich e s-Ri ie enwijk
(Neighbou hood Fund)
The
Ne he lands
Dich e s and
Ri ie en,
U ech
8Neighbo hood ini ia i e und aimed a dis ibu ing
small g an s.
The Aa dehuis p ojec The
Ne he lands
Ols 35
Sus ainable li ing p ojec wi h 23 houses and a
communi y building; municipali y, ansi ion ini ia i es,
and o he pa ne s a e in ol ed.
Blue Ci y The
Ne he lands
Ro e dam 24
B eeding g ound in Ro e dam o inno a i e companies
ha y o connec hei loops oge he : One company’s
ou pu is ano he company’s inpu .
Pa ce ia Local de Telhei as
(Local pa ne ship) Po ugal Telhei as,
Lumia , Lisbon 43
Neighbo hood pa ne ship ha esul ed om a
ansi ion ini ia i e and a local agenda 21 p omo ed by
he municipali y.
Coimb a em T ansição Po ugal Coimb a 25 Designing a local hub o ansi ion.
Ze o Was e Village Spain O endain,
Gipuzkoa 14 P ojec based on was e managemen /ci cula economy.
La Ga o xa Te i o i
Resilien Spain Ga o xa (21
Municipali ies) 36
Ru al egion ha is home o 21 municipali ies and o e
500 local communi y o ganiza ions ha wo k oge he
owa ds a sus ainable and well-ne wo ked socie y.
Ma es Mad id Spain P o ince o
Mad id 48
U ban ans o ma ion by p omo ing social economy and
collabo a ion (ene gy, ecycling, ood, mobili y, and
social ca e economy).
Almóci a, semilla en
ansiciónSpain
Almóci a,
Alme ía,
Andalucía
30
Municipali y ac i ely pa icipa ing in he ansi ion
mo emen , in aspec s such as ene ge ic sel -su iciency,
compos ing, and ca - ee.
Inicia i a RubíB illa Spain
Rub
í
, Ba celona,
Ca alunya 35
Local s a egy o change he ene ge ic model, p omo ing
ene gy sa ing and ene gy e iciency in all he sec o s o
he ci y.
Desca boniza! Que non é
pouco Spain
San iago de
Compos ela,
Galicia
19 O ganize and gi e suppo o g oups o people who a e
willing o “deca bonize” hei li es yles.
La Colabo ado a Spain Za agoza 33
Fi s cowo king P2P ha p omo es a collabo a i e
economy in he ci y h ough a ime bank o olun a y
exchange o se ices and knowledge.
Ci izen ini ia i e o
imp o e people´s li es in
he municipali y
Spain Quén a ,
G anada 19 Ci izen educa ion o imp o ing communi y li ing.
Comunidades en
ansiciónSpain Za zalejo,
Mad id 26
T ansi ion Ini ia i es, CSA, collec i e space,
anspo a ion, was e managemen , pa icipa o y
budge s.

Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 17 o 24
Table A1. Con .
Name o he Case S udy Coun y Loca ion G id
Sco e Summa y
Red Hue os U banos
Comuni a ios Spain Mad id 39 Many small ga dens will g ow small people who will
change he ci ies.
Tu u a Social cu ency Spain Vilano a i la
Gel ú29 P omo ing collec i e ci izenship p ojec s, including
social cu ency.
Sie a Oes e Ag oecologica
Spain
Sie a Oes e de
Mad id (19
Municipali ies)
24 Regional pa ne ship o ag oecological de elopmen .
Mon equin o (Dos
He manas) Spain Se ille 14 Pe macul u e p ojec o local esilience.
Jaén en T ansición Spain Jaén 37
T ansi ion Ini ia i e. The p ojec op s o local ini ia i es
ha a e mo ing owa ds economic deg ow h and good
li ing.
Mu cia IT - Inno ación y
T adiciónSpain Mu cia 35 Pa icipa o y In eg a ed Sus ainable U ban
De elopmen s a egy.
Implemen a ion o he
local digi al cu ency in
he con ex o in elligen
public spending
Spain
San a Coloma
de G amene ,
Ba celona,
Ca aluña
37 Local cu ency o p omo e social and democ a ic
economy.
Mós oles en T ansición Spain Mós oles 29
T ansi ion ini ia i e wi h he pa icipa ion o he
municipali y; implemen a ion o a new ci y model ha
aces he ecosocial challenges.
Vilawa Spain Viladecans,
Ba celona 31
Reduc ion o ene gy consump ion wi h inno a i e ools
(local cu ency).
Växjö Sweden Ci y 38 Mo e han 30 yea s o wo k on sus ainabili y.
Ai quali y: An engaging
na a i e
Uni ed
Kingdom Sou hamp on 40
Conce ns abou poo local ai quali y and heal h ha e
helped c ea e close collabo a ion be ween local o icials,
councilo s and g oups o esiden s.
Ca ing Town Uni ed
Kingdom
Ma ke Town o
To nes (and
su ounding
dis ic ), Sou h
Hams, De on
45
Local ne wo k o public, olun a y and p i a e
o ganiza ion coming oge he o pool esou ces, skills
and ideas.
Pollina o P ese a ion Uni ed
Kingdom
Monmou hshi e
18 P ese ing bees in a ansi ion con ex .
Town O cha ds Uni ed
Kingdom Cheps ow 15
The plan ing o o cha ds on own council land gi ing
he communi y he oppo uni y o pick sus ainably
g own local ui .
Walking Bus Uni ed
Kingdom Cheps ow 17
The c ea ion o a walking bus o encou age school
child en o walk o school educing emissions and
c ea ing a heal hie li es yle.
Clima e P o ec o s
Uni ed
S a es o
Ame ica
Sonoma
Coun y,
Cali o nia
35
The “clima e p o ec o s” is a well-s uc u ed
collabo a ion in e ms o p omo ing clima e ac ion, bo h
om public and go e nmen s, wi h se en yea s o
expe ience.
Sanc ua y School
Uni ed
S a es o
Ame ica
Milwaukee 10
P omo ing healing a s wi h public, special
“unde se ed communi ies” and “mino i ies.” C ea i i y
seems o play a g ea ole.
T ansi ion Cen e
Eme ging Sus ainabili y
Cul u e
Uni ed
S a es o
Ame ica
Cen e Coun y,
Pennsyl ania 45
The p ojec ´s ocus is on p omo ing a sha ed ision,
planning, and ne wo king. They gi e g ea impo ance
o economy.
Compos pickup in Media
PA
Uni ed
S a es o
Ame ica
Media,
Pennsyl ania 19 Recycling ood was e in a ansi ion con ex and
collabo a ion wi h municipali y.
T ansi ion S ee s pilo
p ojec - Des Moines
Clima e Ac ion Plan
Uni ed
S a es o
Ame ica
Des Moines,
Iowa 30 Clima e Ac ion Plan wi h a ansi ion con ex .
Building Communi y
Resilience h ough
G ass oo s and
Go e nmen
Collabo a ions
Uni ed
S a es o
Ame ica
Sonoma,
Cali o nia 59
Decade o success ul collabo a ion be ween g ass oo s
and local go e nmen ha ca alyze wide-scale
communi y ac ion.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 18 o 24
Appendix B
Table A2. Analyses o eigh cases o local collabo a ion, including go e nance model, policies, ools, and wo k in p og ess.
Case His o y Go e nance Model Policies and Tools Wo k in P og ess
Daily Ac s,
Sonoma, Uni ed
S a es o Ame ica
Founded in 2002, Daily Ac s (DA) is an educa ional NGO
whose pu pose is o be a ca alys o pe sonal and
communi y ans o ma ion. A e unning
communi y-based sus ainabili y educa ion p og ams o
i e yea s, DA ecognized ha pa ne ing wi h LGs was a
c i ical pa hway o build o ganiza ional capaci y and a ec
sys emic change.
Meanwhile LGs ecognized ha DA could o e (1) a unique
abili y o engage he communi y; (2) sus ainabili y expe ise;
(3) ope a ing in a cos -e ec i e way. The i s con ac o a
join educa ional p og am was signed wi h he ci y o
Pe aluma in 2007 and o he s ollowed. The main ba ie
ini ially was aluing DA’s se ices.
Go e nmen pa ne ships a e based on
egula yea ly inancial con ac s o
implemen sus ainabili y p og ams.
DA engages sus ainabili y expe s and
a wide ange o non-p o i s, businesses,
go e nmen agencies, and o he
o ganiza ions ac oss he gamu o
sus ainabili y- ela ed issues. DA wo ks
wi h app oxima ely a dozen di e en
alliances and ne wo ks.
Beyond la ening leade ship and
mo ing i o he edges o he
o ganiza ion and wo king in coali ions,
DA is mo ing in a p og amma ic
di ec ion ha mo e deeply engages he
leade ship o communi ies.
DA was bo n ou o a pe macul u e design
app oach wi h he unde lying e hical
p inciples o ea h ca e, people ca e, and
ai sha e, and he p ima y me hodology
being o ake an in eg a ed and
holis ic app oach.
DA wo k wi h go e nmen agencies is a
co e s a egy o a ec ing wide-scale
communi y ans o ma ion while building
o ganiza ional and mo emen capaci y in
he communi y esilience ield. Some o he
co e ope a ing p inciples a e (1) sha ed
leade ship; (2) nu u ing non-p o i
ne wo ks; (3) wo king wi h business and
go e nmen ; (4) doing bo h p og am
implemen a ion and ad ocacy wo k.
DA p omo es ‘homeg own p og ams’
ans o ming homes and landscapes in o
p oduc i e, esilien ecosys ems—educa ional
ou s expose people o inspi ing and p ac ical
examples; wo kshops help people de elop
p ac ical skills; ga den ins alla ions and
landscape ans o ma ions help people wo k
oge he o c ea e p ac ical ac s o
ans o ma ion.
‘Communi y Resilience Challenge’ is an annual
campaign o inspi e wide-scale collabo a i e
ac ion. Ac i i ies p omo ed ange om
plan ing ui ees o ins alling g eywa e and
ainwa e ca chmen sys ems o commi ing o
educe was e, shop local, and hos ing
neighbo hood po lucks.
Ecobai o, São
Paulo, B azil
Inspi a ion o Ecobai o came om educa ional expe iences
ela ed o Eco illages (2004). The ini ial ounde s (La a
F ei as and Paulo San os) go oge he wi h o he people
and p esen ed he p og am in 2005, ecei ing ins i u ional
suppo om he Ci y Council and Uni ed Na ions.
Bigges challenge in he beginning was he lack o public
awa eness. The p og am is now also ope a ing in Sal ado
and Fei a de San ana.
Ecobai o is an endu ing p og am om
he Roe ich Ins i u e o Peace and
Cul u e o B azil. In São Paulo i is
hos ed by he o ganiza ion Casa
U us a i. The e is a s uc u e o
coo dina o s, ad ise s, and nuclea o s,
wi h a sys emic app oach o leade ship.
Decision-making is always in g oup.
Focus on u ban sus ainabili y and
eco-neighbo hoods, while connec ing
di e en le els, om pe sonal o plane a y.
P ojec is g ounded in he ‘mo he ’s
pedagogy,’ based on an analogy wi h
mo he hood ( os e ing alues as deep
inclusion, ca e, in ui ion, openness, and
lexibili y). Use ools like Non iolen
Communica ion o Open Space and he
amewo k o SDG.
Ac i i ies include ec ui men o olun ee s;
ac i e dialogues wi h local agen s and
uni e si ies; campaigns, ainings, exhibi ions,
and wo kshops on en i onmen al p ac ices
and opics; ne wo king wi h he Global
Eco illage Ne wo k and T ansi ion Mo emen ;
collabo a ing in local public ini ia i es like
UMAPAZ (Open Uni e si y o En i onmen
and Cul u e o Peace) and Municipal Council
o En i onmen and Sus ainable
De elopmen .
Ene gy Func ion,
Emilia Romagna,
I aly
In 2008 “Mon e eglio Ci àdi T ansizione” was he i s
T ansi ion Ini ia i e in I aly and s a ed i s ac i i y wi h a
qui e isible, o icial and unusual s a egic pa ne ship wi h
he Municipali y. Toge he hey led ac ion on he Co enan
o Mayo s and succeeded in in ol ing he whole ‘Unione di
Comuni’ (6 municipali ies). This was he basis o a
pa ne ship wi h he egional b anch o ANCI (Na ional
Associa ion o Municipali ies), in 2009, aimed a eplica ing
his example and c ea e suppo ools. CURSA (Uni e si y
Conso ium o Socioeconomic and En i onmen al
Resea ch) joined he e o on he behal o he na ional
En i onmen al Minis y.
A e a ew yea s o expe imen s was e iden he need o a
gene al amewo k o make easie he day by day
challenges posed by he complexi y o he di e en con ex s.
I is belie ed ha ene gy issues (and
he necessa y ansi ion o a low-ca bon
economy) b ings new challenges o
local go e nance and should be
included as a new municipali ies’
unc ion (changing legisla ion).
The Ene gy Func ion (EF) should be a
local policy ans e sal o all exis en
policies; ocused on acili a ion and
suppo o amilies and businesses;
g ounded in mul i-le el go e nance;
s ic ly dependen on he peculia i ies
o he e i o y (na u al and social
capi al); u gen while ha ing a
medium-long e m pe spec i e.
The p inciple o designing he EF we e:
ha ing a gene al, sys emic amewo k easy
enough o be unde s ood wi h a simple
lea ning cu e and ha ing a way o
o ganize all he a ailable ools,
me hodologies and needed in o ma ion o
hose ying o wo k in he ield.
In spi e o he name, he ac ual model o
he EF can hold much mo e han “ene gy
issues” being a sys emic ool s ongly
inspi ed by he T ansi ion wo k, sys em
hinking, and a ious heo ies o change
app oaches. I has a s ochas ic design.
The Ene gy Func ion app oach is based on a
ela ionship g id ha holds he “scena io” and
an in ended pa e n language da abase ha
con ains ools and needed in o ma ion. All is
designed o be p ac ical and g ounded on
eali y bu wi hou simpli ying he complex
en i onmen and se o condi ions and
ela ionships eal li e p esen s.
The EF was indica ed as a necessa y ool on he
Regional Ene gy S a egy o Emilia Romagna
bu kep unde de eloped.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 19 o 24
Table A2. Con .
Case His o y Go e nance Model Policies and Tools Wo k in P og ess
Fu u e Ci y
D esden 2030+,
D esden,
Ge many
In 2015, he Fede al Minis y o Educa ion and Resea ch
(BMBF) launched he Fu u e Ci y o Sus ainable
De elopmen compe i ion. Th ee phases we e conside ed:
(1) De elopmen o a common ision; (2) planning; (3)
implemen a ion. D esden’s go e nmen decided o apply in
2015 and is one o he se en inalis s going o phase 3 in
2019, ecei ing a ound one million eu os o ha pu pose.
The p ocess is d i en by he
municipali y h ough a p ojec manage
who o med a ‘Fu u e Ci y eam.’ Fi s
p ojec pa ne s we e wo scien i ic
bodies, he Leibniz Ins i u e o
Ecological U ban and Regional
De elopmen and he Knowledge
A chi ec u e a he Uni e si y o
D esden (wi h expe ience in designing
p ocesses o wo king wi h people). In
phase 2 o he pa ne s joined (e.g.,
public anspo company and ene gy
p o ide ) and a g oup was o med.
In ol emen was es ic ed o some
mee ings and a con e ence. S onge
collabo a ions a e expec ed in phase 3,
wi h join implemen a ion o p ojec s.
People om ci il socie y we e in ol ed
and he e is a sense o exci emen wi h
he possibili ies o collabo a e.
The ini ia i e ollows he inspi a ion om
he T ansi ion Mo emen , empowe ing
people o ac a hei own places, c ea ing
ooms whe e hey can mee (“people own
he ci y, and hey should be he ones
de eloping i ”). In his way, i is conside ed
a pionee ing p ojec in he go e nmen .
Discussion ooms ha e been s eamlined o
suppo people in he p ocess o c ea ing
p ojec s. Fo example, iden i ying
objec i es, p oblems o sol e, use ul
pe sonal expe iences and skills, e alua ion
c i e ia, e c.
The ini ia i e concen a es on he p ocess as
designed by BMBF, ollowing wha was
included in he applica ion.
In his phase (2) e o s a e di ec ed o
codesigning p ojec s.
Al hough his planning phase is conside ed oo
abs ac by some pa icipan s, i is belie ed
ha i is a ec ing how people ace
sus ainabili y issues and hei own ole in he
ci y. S onge connec ions a e belie ed o be
he g ea es ou come a his s age.
A ca alogue was p epa ed wi h all he ideas
ela ing o educa ion, campus and ci izen
knowledge; neighbo hood; ene gy; sus ainable
economy and business model; mobili y; u ban
space; ci izen pa icipa ion; cul u e and capi al
o cul u e.
Jungapeo en
T ansición,
Jungapeo,
Mexico
The NGO ‘P o Desa ollo In eg al del Municipio de
Jungapeo’ was c ea ed in 2015 (g ass oo s’ ac i i ies s a ed
in 2005), ocused in local, in eg al de elopmen . In 2016 he
local mayo challenged he NGO o ans o m Jungapeo
in o he i s o icial T ansi ion own in M
é
xico, which led o
a signed ag eemen .
Ba ie s a e mis us ed based on p e ious bad expe iences;
apa hy by he popula ion; sho exe cise o powe o he
municipal au ho i ies; lack o con inui y due o o e wo k.
Jungapeo en T ansición (JET) is
managed by a ull- ime s a dependen
on he CBI. I is g ounded in a ma ix
o ganiza ion wi h h ee axes (social,
ag icul u e, and ou ism) and i e
componen s ha in e ac wi h he axes
(ecology, cul u e, heal h, educa ion, and
spo s). Collabo a ion wi h
municipali y is suppo ed by egula
b ie ings and by in i ing membe s o
he municipali y o wo kshops and
ac i i ies.
Local agen s a e in ol ed, also h ough
ocal g oups (child en, s uden s,
business, eache s, elde s).
Inspi a ion comes mainly om he
T ansi ion Mo emen . I in ends o
“e adica e he men ali y o assis encialism
and dependency” and empowe he
communi y o iden i y hei needs and help
o esol e hem.
Collabo a ion be ween LGs and CBIs is
expec ed o g ow based on us and
con idence a i ing om join success ul
ac i i ies—small ini ial s eps wi h big
isibili y.
Tools like socioc acy, coaching, and
Robe ’s Rules o O de a e used o os e
inclusion and pa icipa ion.
O ganized ac i i ies ange om cleaning i e s
o compe i ions o hono ing he dead
(embedded in Mexican cul u e), local ma ke s
o d y oile s.
An educa ional app oach is he ocus,
including wo kshops o elde s, you h and
o he g oups.
Rega dless o he se e al esul s ha ha e
emana ed om own p ojec s, hey ha e been
able o obse e ecen “ou b eaks” o
spon aneous and o de ly eamwo k among he
local popula ion, “as i he T ansi ion E ec
we e con agious.”
Moni o ing includes egula and ex ensi e
su eys o pa ne s, bene icia ies and public.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 20 o 24
Table A2. Con .
Case His o y Go e nance Model Policies and Tools Wo k in P og ess
MARES, Mad id,
Spain
The economic c isis o 2008 inc eased unemploymen and
u ban social-spa ial seg ega ion. Dinamia (social consul ing)
joined he municipali y, Tangen e and Vi e o de Inicia i as
Ciudadanas ( wo collabo a i e pla o ms) wi h he idea o
suppo ing exis en CBIs ela ed o social and solida i y
economy. O he pa ne s joined he ini ia i e.
MARES is a pa ne ship cen alised in
he Council. Se e al pa ne s
pa icipa e in he execu i e, economic
and inance commi ee (wi h o ing
igh s) and s ee ing g oups (led by
di e en pa ne s). Con ol p ocesses
we e de ined, such as managemen
plan, quali y plan, isk assessmen plan,
e alua ion sys em and moni o ing,
handbook o in e nal communica ion
and decision making.
The ocus is on u ban economic esilience.
I in ends o s eng hen he eme ging
oppo uni ies in s a egic sec o s ( anspo ,
ood, was e, ene gy, and ca e, MARES in
Spanish). I seeks o coope a ion among
local ac o s, social inno a ion and he
ac i e p oduc i e in ol emen o ci izens.
The base is o “pu he people be o e he
p o i .” Use ools like he co-design o he
euse o disused buildings and public
spaces; mapping ci izens’ compe encies;
analysis o ca e needs and p oposal o
alue chain; lea ning communi ies.
Ini ia i es o collec i e sel -employmen by
means o inc ease awa eness, aining and
suppo o ci izen g oups. The bigges
challenge is he gene a ion o eal pa icipa o y
public policies in he unc ional and social
ields. The e a e expec s ou comes like a
change o anspo o low emission models,
implemen a ion o enewable ene gies and
ene gy e iciency, imp o ed ca e o olde
people and o he in ancy, consume o local
p oduc s and ag oecologic ood, hope ully
gene a ing employmen .
RubíB illa, Rubí,
Spain
In 2008 he RubíCouncil joined he Co enan o Mayo s,
wi hin he Eu opean ini ia i e o educe ca bon emissions.
A Plan o Ac ion o Sus ainable Ene gies was p epa ed
ex e nally, wi h he suppo o Ba celona Council. The Rub
í
B illa ini ia i e s a ed in 2011.
Angel Ruiz, wo king o he municipali y and p i a e
en ep eneu , played a key ole by b inging expe ise and a
business pe spec i e.
RubíB illa is a se ice p o ided by he
municipali y and managed by a
wo king g oup o eigh in e nal
echnicians. Ene gy expe s ha e been
hi ed in 2013 and se e al collabo a ions
a e es ablished wi h ex e nal en i ies.
A speci ic pa ne ship is buil wi h
schools and o he public o ganiza ions,
whe e decisions a e aken
collec i ely—in his con ex sa ings
om in es men in ene gy e iciency
a e locally ein es ed (50% in new
measu es o ene gy sa ing, leading o
a posi i e eedback loop).
The ini ia i e uses he economic ac o as
he leading mo i a ional ac o and
p io i izes economic ools commonly used
in he business sec o . Using he ‘pa e o
p inciple’ hey ocused on ene gy e iciency
in public buildings. Subs an ial emissions
and cos educ ion we e achie ed so
‘p o i s’ we e ein es ed in new ac ions
(ene gy e iciency and enewable ene gy).
The clea cos -cu ing is used as an
a gumen o con ince p i a e pa ne s.
A majo pa o he wo k done ela es o he
p i a e sec o (indus y accoun s o 40% o
emissions). This is mos ly done by p omo ing
echnical mee ings wi h he bigges ene gy
use s, we e lea nings a e sha ed and suppo is
p o ided. This includes collabo a ions wi h
he Poly echnic Uni e si y o Ca alunya.
O he ac i i ies include p o iding moni o ing
apps o amilies, ene gy cen e s a
neighbo hood le el, and buying
elec ic ehicles.
Da a moni o ing is a key ac i i y, including
eal ime checking o consump ion and
e iciency indica o s. Ci izens a e p o ided
wi h in o ma ion on ene gy cos s in public
buildings and s ee ligh ing.
Växjö, Sweden
The municipali y saw a need o es o e he local lakes in
1969 and he en i onmen al ocus has con inued since hen.
In 1993, LG app o ed a local en i onmen al policy and in
1996 decided o become a ossil uel- ee municipali y. In
1999, a Local Agenda 21 s a egy o Sus ainable Växjö was
adop ed. In 2006, he LG’s En i onmen al P og am was
ag eed (upda ed in 2010 and 2014).
Se e al pa icipa o y e o s (polls, mee ings
. . .
) ha e been
ied bu he esul s we e unsa is ac o y.
The de elopmen has been d i en by
municipal depa men s and
municipally-owned co po a ions. Since
May 2016 he e is a sus ainabili y g oup
which is pa o he de elopmen uni
o he municipal managemen . The
g oup has wo poli icians assigned o i
and o mula es he En i onmen al
P og am. I is up o each ope a ion uni
o b eak his down in o ac ionable,
budge ed s eps wi h measu es ela ed
o he goals.
The main p inciple is o p omo e a s ong
poli ical leade ship wi h bold decisions.
The basic app oach, since 1969, has been a
sequence o poli ical decision >s ee ing
documen s >goals >municipal
boa ds/co po a ions plans >budge s >
ollow up>publica ion in annual epo
wi h goal sco eca ds.
To assu e con inui y h ee main ac o s a e
conside ed: (1) Consensus among pa ies;
(2) di ec in ol emen o poli icians; (3)
s ong managemen s uc u e in place.
Wo k is unde way o align he p og am
wi h he SDGs ( eady 2019).
The En i onmen al P og am’s measu able
goals a e planned and moni o ed h ough
Växjö municipali y’s managemen sys em.
Each municipal s ee ing boa d and company
a e esponsible o ul illmen o he goals as
well as o deli e s a is ics. The annual epo
is publicly a ailable.
Mul iple ou comes a e isible, like be e ai
and wa e quali y, g een spaces, o
sophis ica ed was e so ing.
The e is a eeling o p ide in being a he
o e on o en i onmen al de elopmen .
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 21 o 24
Re e ences
1.
S e en, W.; B oadga e, W.; Deu sch, L.; Ga ney, O.; Ludwig, C. The ajec o y o he An h opocene: The G ea
Accele a ion. An h . Re . 2015,2, 81–98. [C ossRe ]
2.
Göpel, M. The G ea Mindshi ; The An h opocene: Poli ik—Economics—Socie y—Science; Sp inge
In e na ional Publishing: Cham, Swi ze land, 2016; Volume 2, ISBN 978-3-319-43765-1.
3.
Vangen, S. De eloping P ac ice-O ien ed Theo y on Collabo a ion: A Pa adox Lens. Public Adm. Re .
2017
,
77, 263–272. [C ossRe ]
4.
Pa el, H.; Pe i , M.; Wilson, J.R. Fac o s o collabo a i e wo king: A amewo k o a collabo a ion model.
Appl. E gon. 2012,43, 1–26. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
5.
IPCC. Clima e Change 2014: Impac s, Adap a ion, and Vulne abili y. Pa A: Global and Sec o al Aspec s.
Con ibu ion o Wo king G oup II o he Fi h Assessmen Repo o he In e go e nmen al Panel on Clima e Change;
Field, C.B., Ba os, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mas and ea, M.D., Bili , T.E., Cha e jee, M., Ebi, K.L.,
Es ada, Y.O., Geno a, R.C., e al., Eds.; Camb idge Uni e si y P ess: Camb idge, UK; New Yo k, NY, USA,
2014; ISBN 9781107415379.
6.
Loo bach, D.; F an zeskaki, N.; A elino, F. Sus ainabili y T ansi ions Resea ch: T ans o ming Science and
P ac ice o Socie al Change. Annu. Re . En i on. Resou . 2017,42, 599–626. [C ossRe ]
7.
Ma ka d, J.; Ra en, R.; T u e , B. Sus ainabili y ansi ions: An eme ging ield o esea ch and i s p ospec s.
Res. Policy 2012,41, 955–967. [C ossRe ]
8.
EEA. Pe spec i es on T ansi ions o Sus ainabili y; Eu opean En i onmen Agency: Luxembou g, 2018;
ISBN 978-92-9213-939-1.
9.
Pa e son, J.; Schulz, K.; Ve oo , J.; an de Hel, S.; Wide be g, O.; Adle , C.; Hu lbe , M.; Ande on, K.;
Se hi, M.; Ba au, A. Explo ing he Go e nance and Poli ics o T ans o ma ions owa ds Sus ainabili y; Else ie B.V.:
Ams e dam, The Ne he lands, 2017; Volume 24, pp. 1–16.
10.
Abson, D.J.; Fische , J.; Le en on, J.; Newig, J.; Schome us, T.; Vilsmaie , U.; on Weh den, H.; Abe ne hy, P.;
I es, C.D.; Jage , N.W.; e al. Le e age poin s o sus ainabili y ans o ma ion. Ambio
2017
,46, 30–39.
[C ossRe ]
11.
Mille , T.R.; Wiek, A.; Sa ewi z, D.; Robinson, J.; Olsson, L.; K iebel, D.; Loo bach, D. The u u e o
sus ainabili y science: A solu ions-o ien ed esea ch agenda. Sus ain. Sci. 2014,9, 239–246. [C ossRe ]
12.
Fazey, I.; Moug, P.; Allen, S.; Beckmann, K.; Blackwood, D.; Bona en u a, M.; Bu ne , K.; Danson, M.;
Falcone , R.; Gagnon, A.S.; e al. T ans o ma ion in a changing clima e: A esea ch agenda. Clim. De .
2018
,
10, 197–217. [C ossRe ]
13.
F an zeskaki, N.; Dumi u, A.; Anguelo ski, I.; A elino, F.; Bach, M.; Bes , B.; Binde , C.; Ba nes, J.; Ca us, G.;
Ege mann, M.; e al. Elucida ing he changing oles o ci il socie y in u ban sus ainabili y ansi ions.
Cu . Opin. En i on. Sus ain. 2017,22, 41–50. [C ossRe ]
14.
Campos, I.S.; Al es, F.M.; Dinis, J.; T uninge , M.; Vizinho, A.; Penha-Lopes, G. Clima e adap a ion, ansi ions,
and socially inno a i e ac ion- esea ch app oaches. Ecol. Soc. 2016,21, 13. [C ossRe ]
15. K opo kin, P. Mu ual Aid: A Fac o o E olu ion; Cou ie Co po a ion: No h Chelms o d, MA, USA, 2012.
16.
Cu y, O.S.; Mullins, D.A.; Whi ehouse, H. Is I Good o Coope a e? Tes ing he Theo y o
Mo ali y-as-Coope a ion in 60 Socie ies. Cu . An h opol. 2019,60, 47–69. [C ossRe ]
17.
Kohn, A. No Con es : The Case agains Compe i ion; Hough on Mi lin Ha cou : New Yo k, NY, USA, 1992;
ISBN 0395631254.
18. Lozano, R. Collabo a ion as a pa hway o sus ainabili y. Sus ain. De . 2007,15, 370–381. [C ossRe ]
19.
Nies en, E.; Jolink, A.; Lopes de Sousa Jabbou , A.B.; Chappin, M.; Lozano, R. Sus ainable collabo a ion:
The impac o go e nance and ins i u ions on sus ainable pe o mance. J. Clean. P od.
2017
,155, 1–6. [C ossRe ]
20.
B yson, J.M.; C osby, B.C.; S one, M.M. Designing and Implemen ing C oss-Sec o Collabo a ions: Needed
and Challenging. Public Adm. Re . 2015,75, 647–663. [C ossRe ]
21.
Weible, C.M.; Saba ie , P.A. Coali ions, Science, and Belie Change: Compa ing Ad e sa ial and Collabo a i e
Policy Subsys ems. Policy S ud. J. 2009,37, 195–212. [C ossRe ]
22.
F an zeskaki, N.; Wi maye , J.; Loo bach, D. The ole o pa ne ships in “ ealising” u ban sus ainabili y in
Ro e dam’s Ci y Po s A ea, he Ne he lands. J. Clean. P od. 2014,65, 406–417. [C ossRe ]
23.
Fo sy h, T. Panacea o pa adox? C oss-sec o pa ne ships, clima e change, and de elopmen . Wiley In e discip.
Re . Clim. Chang. 2010,1, 683–696. [C ossRe ]

Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 22 o 24
24.
Wes man, L.; B o o, V.C. Clima e go e nance h ough pa ne ships: A s udy o 150 u ban ini ia i es in China.
Glob. En i on. Chang. 2018,50, 212–221. [C ossRe ]
25. Van Huijs ee, M.M.; F ancken, M.; Le oy, P. Pa ne ships o sus ainable de elopmen : A e iew o cu en
li e a u e. En i on. Sci. 2007,4, 75–89. [C ossRe ]
26.
Ve g ag , P.J.; Quis , J. Backcas ing o sus ainabili y: In oduc ion o he special issue. Technol. Fo ecas .
Soc. Chang. 2011,78, 747–755. [C ossRe ]
27.
Wiek, A.; Iwaniec, D. Quali y c i e ia o isions and isioning in sus ainabili y science. Sus ain. Sci.
2014
,9,
497–512. [C ossRe ]
28.
Eisenhaue , D.C. Pa hways o Clima e Change Adap a ion: Making Clima e Change Ac ion Poli ical.
Geog . Compass 2016,10, 207–221. [C ossRe ]
29.
Leach, M.; Rocks öm, J.; Raskin, P.; Scoones, I.; S i ling, A.C.; Smi h, A.; Thompson, J.; Mills one, E.; Ely, A.;
A ond, E.; e al. T ans o ming Inno a ion o Sus ainabili y. Ecol. Soc. 2012,17, 11. [C ossRe ]
30.
Loo bach, D. T ansi ion Managemen o Sus ainable De elopmen : A P esc ip i e, Complexi y-Based
Go e nance F amewo k. Go e nance 2010,23, 161–183. [C ossRe ]
31.
Loo bach, D. T ansi ion Managemen , New Mode o Go e nance o Sus ainable De elopmen ; In e na ional Books:
U ech , The Ne he lands, 2007; ISBN 978-90-5727-057-4.
32.
Loo bach, D.; Ro mans, J. The p ac ice o ansi ion managemen : Examples and lessons om ou dis inc
cases. Fu u es 2010,42, 237–246. [C ossRe ]
33. Ne ens, F.; F an zeskaki, N.; Go issen, L.; Loo bach, D. U ban T ansi ion Labs: Co-c ea ing ans o ma i e
ac ion o sus ainable ci ies. J. Clean. P od. 2013,50, 111–122. [C ossRe ]
34.
Rydin, Y.; Penning on, M. Public Pa icipa ion and Local En i onmen al Planning: The collec i e ac ion
p oblem and he po en ial o social capi al. Local En i on. 2000,5, 153–169. [C ossRe ]
35.
Hassink, J.; Sal e da, I.; Vaand age , L.; an Dam, R.; Wen ink, C. Rela ionships be ween g een u ban ci izens’
ini ia i es and local go e nmen s. Cogen Soc. Sci. 2016,2, 1–18. [C ossRe ]
36.
TESS. Final Publishable Summa y Repo ; Eu opean Resea ch P ojec TESS (Towa ds Eu opean Socie al
Sus ainabili y): Po sdam, Ge many, 2017.
37.
BASE. Key Policy Issues in Implemen ing and E alua ing he EU Adap a ion S a egy; Resea ch P ojec BASE
Bo om-Up Clima e Adap a ion S a egies Towa ds a Sus ainable Eu ope: Aa hus, Denma k, 2016.
38.
Hen ey, T.; Penha-Lopes, G. Policy and communi y-led ac ion on sus ainabili y and clima e change: Pa adox
and possibili y in he in e s ices. En i on. Inno . Soc. T ansi ions 2018,29, 52–54. [C ossRe ]
39.
Re ell, P.; Hende son, C. Ope a ionalising a amewo k o unde s anding communi y esilience in Eu ope.
Reg. En i on. Chang. 2019,19, 967–979. [C ossRe ]
40.
Bo ai d, T. Beyond Engagemen and Pa icipa ion: Use and Communi y Cop oduc ion o Public Se ices.
Public Adm. Re . 2007,67, 846–860. [C ossRe ]
41.
Os om, E. C ossing he g ea di ide: Cop oduc ion, syne gy, and de elopmen . Wo ld De .
1996
,24,
1073–1087. [C ossRe ]
42.
A elino, F.; Bosman, R.; F an zeskaki, N.; Ake boom, S.; Boon je, P.; Ho man, J.; Pa adies, G.; Pel, B.;
Schol en, D.; Wi maye , J. The (Sel -)Go e nance o Communi y Ene gy: Challenges & P ospec s; DRIFT:
Ro e dam, The Ne he lands, 2014.
43.
Chapin, F.S.; Ca pen e , S.R.; Ko inas, G.P.; Folke, C.; Abel, N.; Cla k, W.C.; Olsson, P.; Smi h, D.M.S.;
Walke , B.; Young, O.R.; e al. Ecosys em s ewa dship: Sus ainabili y s a egies o a apidly changing plane .
T ends Ecol. E ol. 2010,25, 241–249. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
44.
Amundsen, H.; Ho els ud, G.K.; Aall, C.; Ka lsson, M.; Wes skog, H. Local go e nmen s as d i e s o
socie al ans o ma ion: Towa ds he 1.5 ◦C ambi ion. Cu . Opin. En i on. Sus ain. 2018,31, 23–29. [C ossRe ]
45.
Fazey, I.; Ca men, E.; Chapin, F.; Ross, H.; Rao-Williams, J.; Lyon, C.; Connon, I.; Sea le, B.; Knox, K.
Communi y esilience o a 1.5 ◦C wo ld. Cu . Opin. En i on. Sus ain. 2018,31, 30–40. [C ossRe ]
46. Bendell, J. Deep Adap a ion: A Map o Na iga ing Clima e T agedy. IFLAS Occas. Pap. 2018,2, 1–31.
47.
A elino, F.; Wi maye , J.M.; Pel, B.; Wea e , P.; Dumi u, A.; Haxel ine, A.; Kemp, R.; Jø gensen, M.S.;
Baule , T.; Ruijsink, S.; e al. T ans o ma i e social inno a ion and (dis)empowe men . Technol. Fo ecas . Soc.
Chang. 2019,145, 195–206. [C ossRe ]
48.
Bee s, P.J.; Sol, J.; Wals, A. Social Lea ning in a Mul i-Ac o Inno a ion Con ex . In P oceedings o he 9 h
Eu opean IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Aus ia, 4–7 July 2010; pp. 144–153.
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 23 o 24
49.
Sho e, E.; Walke , G. Go e ning ansi ions in he sus ainabili y o e e yday li e. Res. Policy
2010
,39, 471–476.
[C ossRe ]
50.
Ma ka d, J.; T u e , B. Technological inno a ion sys ems and he mul i-le el pe spec i e: Towa ds an
in eg a ed amewo k. Res. Policy 2008,37, 596–615. [C ossRe ]
51.
Hend iks, C.M. Policy design wi hou democ acy? Making democ a ic sense o ansi ion managemen .
Policy Sci. 2009,42, 341–368. [C ossRe ]
52.
Ruijsink, S.; Oli o o, V.; Taanman, M.; Cozan, S.; Wea e , P.; Kemp, R.; Wi maye , J. Social Inno a ion
E alua ion ool: C i ical Tu ning Poin s and Na a i es o Change; TRANSIT: Ro e dam, The Ne he lands, 2017.
53.
Fuen schilling, L.; T u e , B. The s uc u a ion o socio- echnical egimes—Concep ual ounda ions om
ins i u ional heo y. Res. Policy 2014,43, 772–791. [C ossRe ]
54.
Geels,F.W.; Ve hees,B.Cul u allegi imacyand amings ugglesininno a ionjou neys: A cul u al-pe o ma i e
pe spec i e and a case s udy o Du ch nuclea ene gy (1945–1986). Technol. Fo ecas . Soc. Chang.
2011
,78,
910–930. [C ossRe ]
55.
Tosun, J.; Schoene eld, J.J. Collec i e clima e ac ion and ne wo ked clima e go e nance. Wiley In e discip. Re .
Clim. Chang. 2017,8, e440. [C ossRe ]
56.
Geels, F.W. On ologies, socio- echnical ansi ions ( o sus ainabili y), and he mul i-le el pe spec i e.
Res. Policy 2010,39, 495–510. [C ossRe ]
57.
Boge s, M.; Chesb ough, H.; Moedas, C. Open Inno a ion: Resea ch, P ac ices, and Policies. Cali . Manage.
Re . 2018,60, 5–16. [C ossRe ]
58. S inge , E.T. Ac ion Resea ch; Sage Ppublica ions: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-1-4833-0183-9.
59.
Adams, M.; Alexande , C.; Beale, N.; B igh bill, N.; Cahill, C.; Came on, J.; Cha e on, P.; Cie i, M.; Coe, C.;
Dolan, C.; e al. Pa icipa o y Ac ion Resea ch App oaches and Me hods: Connec ing People, Pa icipa ion and Place;
Kindon, S., Pain, R., Kesby, M., Eds.; Rou ledge: New Yo k, NY, USA, 2007; ISBN 0-203-93367-2.
60.
Wi maye , J.M.; Schäpke, N. Ac ion, esea ch and pa icipa ion: Roles o esea che s in sus ainabili y
ansi ions. Sus ain. Sci. 2014,9, 483–496. [C ossRe ]
61.
G ossmann, M.; C eame , E. Assessing di e si y and inclusi i y wi hin he T ansi ion mo emen : An u ban
case s udy. En i on Poli . 2017,26, 161–182. [C ossRe ]
62.
Fe nandes-Jesus, M.; Ca alho, A.; Fe nandes, L.; Ben o, S. Communi y engagemen in he T ansi ion
mo emen : Views and p ac ices in Po uguese ini ia i es. Local En i on. 2017,22, 1546–1562. [C ossRe ]
63.
Penha-Lopes, G.; Hen ey, T. Reshaping he Fu u e: How Local Communi ies A e Ca alysing Social, Economic
and Ecological T ans o ma ion in Eu ope. The Fi s S a us Repo on Communi y-led Ac ion on Sus ainabili y and
Clima e Change in Eu ope; ECOLISE: B ussels, Belgium, 2019; ISBN 978-2-9602393-0-0.
64.
Biddau, F.; A men i, A.; Co one, P. Socio-psychological aspec s o g ass oo s pa icipa ion in he T ansi ion
Mo emen : An I alian case s udy. J. Soc. Poli . Psychol. 2016,4, 142–165. [C ossRe ]
65.
Longhu s , N.; Pa aki, G. WP4 CASE STUDY Repo : The T ansi ion Mo emen ; TRANSIT: Ro e dam,
The Ne he lands, 2015.
66.
Smi h, A. The T ansi ion Town Ne wo k: A Re iew o Cu en E olu ions and Renaissance. Soc. Mo . S ud.
2011,10, 99–105. [C ossRe ]
67.
Feola, G.; Nunes, R. Success and ailu e o g ass oo s inno a ions o add essing clima e change: The case o
he T ansi ion Mo emen . Glob. En i on. Chang. 2014,24, 232–250. [C ossRe ]
68.
Rossi, A.; Pinca, G.; Ca alle i, A.; Ba olomei, M.; Bo one, C. La Funzione Ene gia nei Comuni e nelle
Unioni. In Quali
à
Dell’ambien e U bano—X Rappo o—Focus su Le Ci
à
e la S ida dei Cambiamen i Clima ici;
ISPRA: Roma, I alia, 2014; ISBN 978-88-448-0686-6.
69.
Aguia , F.C.; Ben z, J.; Sil a, J.M.N.; Fonseca, A.L.; Swa , R.; San os, F.D.; Penha-Lopes, G. Adap a ion o
clima e change a local le el in Eu ope: An o e iew. En i on. Sci. Policy 2018,86, 38–63. [C ossRe ]
70.
Sey ang, G.; Pa k, J.J.; Smi h, A. A housand lowe s blooming? An examina ion o communi y ene gy in he
UK. Ene gy Policy 2013,61, 977–989. [C ossRe ]
71.
Rendon, O.; Gebha d , O.; B an h Pede sen, A.; B eil, M.; Campos, I.; Chiabai, A.; Den Uyl, R.M.; Foudi, S.;
Ga o e, L.; Ha m
á
ˇcko
á
, Z.; e al. Implemen a ion o Clima e Change Adap a ion: Ba ie s and Oppo uni ies o
Adap a ion in Case S udies; BASE: Leeds, UK, 2016.
72.
Schoon, M.; Cox, M. Collabo a ion, Adap a ion, and Scaling: Pe spec i es on En i onmen al Go e nance o
Sus ainabili y. Sus ainabili y 2018,10, 679. [C ossRe ]
Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 795 24 o 24
73.
EEA. U ban Adap a ion o Clima e Change in Eu ope 2016—T ans o ming Ci ies in a Changing Clima e; Eu opean
En i onmen Agency: Luxembou g, 2016.
74.
Tu nheim, B.; Be khou , F.; Geels, F.; Ho , A.; McMeekin, A.; Nyk is , B.; an Vuu en, D. E alua ing
sus ainabili y ansi ions pa hways: B idging analy ical app oaches o add ess go e nance challenges.
Glob. En i on. Chang. 2015,35, 239–253. [C ossRe ]
75.
Jø gensen, U. Mapping and na iga ing ansi ions—The mul i-le el pe spec i e compa ed wi h a enas o
de elopmen . Res. Policy 2012,41, 996–1010. [C ossRe ]
76.
Cunsolo, A.; Ellis, N.R. Ecological g ie as a men al heal h esponse o clima e change- ela ed loss.
Na . Clim. Chang. 2018,8, 275–281. [C ossRe ]
77.
Le zman, R. En i onmen al Melancholia—Psychoanaly ic Dimensions o Engagemen ; Rou ledge: London, UK,
2015; ISBN 9781315851853.
78.
Macy, J.; B own, M.Y. Coming Back o Li e: The Upda ed Guide o he Wo k ha Reconnec s; New Socie y
Publishe s: Gab iola Island, BC, Canada, 2014; ISBN 978-1-55092-580-7.
79.
MiT. The MiT F amewo k o he Pilo s. A ailable online: h p://municipali iesin ansi ion.o g/wp-
con en /uploads/si es/3/2019/09/MiT-F amewo k_ e sion-1.1-Ap il-2018- o-be-published.pd (accessed on
12 Decembe 2019).
80.
Bockelb ink, B.; P ies , J.; Da id, L. Socioc acy 3.0—A P ac ical Guide. A ailable online: h ps://socioc acy30.
o g/_ es/p ac ical-guide/S3-p ac ical-guide-ebook.pd (accessed on 22 No embe 2018).
©
2020 by he au ho s. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access
a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion
(CC BY) license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/).