scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

One of the minor gods: A case study on Khentytjenenet, an Old Kingdom deity of the Memphite necropolis

Abstract

Hitherto sparse evidence on Khentytjenenet has been markedly enlarged owing to new excavations of the Czech archaeological mission at Abusir. A recently discovered cluster of individuals holding priestly titles and/or epithets referring to Khentytjenenet has given us an impetus to scrutinise this deity. Records of Khentytjenenet are closely connected with a specific geographical part of the Memphite necropolis – Abusir and North Saqqara. The appearance of this deity was obviously associated with social, religious and administrative changes during the reign of Nyuserre. The title “hem-netjer-priest of Khentytjenet” appeared for the first time in the titulary of the high priest Ptahshepses, buried at North Saqqara (C1), and simultaneously within personal names of individuals who held offices under Nyuserre and were buried at Abusir or North Saqqara. Whereas personal names compounded with the element Khentytjenenet were characteristic for the mid-Fifth Dynasty, the title hem-netjer-priest and epithet imakhu kher linked with Khentytjenet occurred in the Sixth Dynasty. His name was also the component of several names of royal domains and estates in the late Fifth and early Sixth Dynasty.

Read accessible full text

One of the minor gods: A case study on Khentytjenenet, an Old Kingdom deity of the Memphite necropolis

Author: Veronika Dulíková
Publisher: Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta
Year: 2016
Source: https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/20.500.11956/96778/1/1484130_veronika_dulikova_36-46.pdf
36 PES XVII/2016 STUDIES
One o he mino gods: A case s udy
on Khen y jenene , an Old Kingdom dei y
o he Memphi e nec opolis
Ve onika Dulíko á
The appea ance o he god Osi is in he mid-Fi h Dynas y is well-known and many esea che s ha e
been in e es ed in i (e.g. G i i hs 1966; Bolshako 1992 and 2001; Shalomi-Hen 2007 and 2015;
Ma hieu 2010). Se e al so-called mino gods eme ged app oxima ely simul aneously wi h Osi is,
including o ins ance Khen y jenene . This ac coincided wi h a ans o ma ion o he whole socie y
o ancien Egyp , which came o pass du ing he eign o Nyuse e. A numbe o inno a ions came
abou in a ious sphe es – eligion, socie y, adminis a ion, omb a chi ec u e, e c. – mi o ing
achange in he powe pa icipa ion in he socie y a ha ime ( o exempli ica ion o he mos dis inc
changes, see Dulíko á 2016). The e idence o he god Khen y jenene in he Six h Dynas y has been
g owing owing o he exca a ions o he Czech Ins i u e o Egyp ology a Abusi Sou h.1
Fig. 1 The alse doo o He epuni, bu ied a Abusi Sou h, who se ed as “hem-ne je -p ies o Khen y jenene ” and was e e ed wi h he same god
(pho o M. F ouz, d awing J. Malá ko á)
The name o he god Khen y jenene is li e ally ansla ed
as “Fo emos o he Tjenene ” (Do man 2002: 106), “ he
Fo emos one o Tjenene ” (e.g. Jones 2000: 36, no. 177)
o “He who is a he head o The Ele a ed Place”
(Holmbe g 1946: 217–218). A ew esea che s ha e
pa ially deal wi h Khen y jenene in hei s udies
conce ning p ima ily eligion issues. In connec ion wi h
he Abydos lis and using Old Kingdom ex s, He mann
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:41 S ánka 36
Kees (1915: 58–59) and John Baines (1988) ouched on
Khen y jenene in hei excellen ea ises, as did
Alexande He mann Schlögl (1980: 105–107) in his
excu sus on an anonymous dei y in his monog aph abou
he god Ta enen. In hei esea ch on his god in he Old
Kingdom pe iod, Ba ba a L. Begelsbache -Fische (1981:
212, 232) and Ch is ian Lei z (2002: 876) men ioned
Khen y jenene in hei o e iews, which e lec a abula
and al e na i ely encyclopaedic cha ac e .2
While some schola s ha e conside ed Khen y jenene o
be a mani es a ion o aspec o he god P ah (e.g. Do man
2002: 100), he appea s as an independen dei y. Finally,
Baines (1988: 127) assumes ha Khen y jenene is possi-
bly ela ed o Ta enen, a god closely associa ed wi h P ah
in he New Kingdom.
The dei y Khen y jenene has occu ed in p ies ly i les
and epi he s, as a componen o pe sonal names, as a pa
o he names o une a y domains o es a es, and once in
ano he con ex – on a agmen om Ne e i ka e’s
papy us a chi e (see below). E en hough he geog aphic
dis ibu ion o he e idence on Khen y jenene is limi ed
o a ce ain e i o y o he Memphi e nec opolis, a isual
aspec o his god in he ime o he Old Kingdom is
unknown.
In se ice o he god: Khen y jenene as pa
o p ies ly i les and epi he s
The i le “hem-ne je -p ies o Khen y jenene ”
This dei y i s appea s in connec ion wi h he p ies ly
i le Hm-nT #n y-*nn , “hem-ne je -p ies o he god
Khen y jenene ” (Jones 2000: 569, no. 2095) wi hin he
i ula y o he high- anking p ies , P ahshepses, who was
bu ied a No h Saqqa a [C1] and who became he son-in-
law o King Use ka (see e.g. Ma ie e 1889: 110–114;
Do man 2002). This indi idual ep esen s he only
documen ed p ies o he god Khen y jenene in he Fi h
Dynas y. I is no ewo hy ha he name o Osi is appea ed
o he e y i s ime p ecisely on he alse doo o his
man (see Do man 2002: 100, Fig. 3). The o icial Duahep,
who also anked among he i s people in oking Osi is,
named his son I e -Khen y jenene (see below; o mo e
in o ma ion abou Osi is, see Dulíko á 2016).
!em-ne je -p ies s conduc ed i uals in emples connec -
ed wi h he s a ues o kings and gods, d essing, ado ning,
pu i ying and umiga ing hem wi h incense and oils. They
also pa icipa ed in he ci cula ion o ood o e ings in
hese emples (Posene -K iége 1976: 574–581; Ro h 1991:
79–81).
Th ee mo e bea e s o he i le Hm-nT #n y-*nn li ed
du ing he Six h Dynas y and we e bu ied a No h Saqqa a
o Abusi Sou h (see ab. 1). One o hem was Sabu Ibebi
[Nos. 37–38 = E 1–2] (Ma ie e 1889: 460–461), who
buil his omb in he icini y o he mas aba o he
a o e-men ioned p ies , P ahshepses, a he beginning o
he Six h Dynas y.
Mo eo e , he s uc u e o Sabu Ibebi’s i ula y and he
ype o his i les esemble hose o P ahshepses. Sabu Ibebi
sha ed he omb wi h a ce ain P ahshepses, his supposed
son. Was Sabu Ibebi a ela i e o he high- anking p ies
P ahshepses [C 1]? The uniqueness o some o hei i les
wi hin ancien Egyp , he closeness o hei ombs and he
equen occu ence o he name, P ahshepses, in Sabu
Ibebi’s amily sugges his assump ion.
He epuni and Se ekhu, wo o he Six h Dynas y p ies s
o Khen y jenene , buil hei ombs a Abusi Sou h. The
alse doo o He epuni, a p ies bu ied in he cou ya d o
P incess She e neb y [AS 68, p obably in Sha 8], e eals
ha he se ed as a “hem-ne je -p ies o Khen y jenene ”,
wab 200 Mn-n -M y- a, “wab-p ies o he wo hund ed o
he py amid Men-ne e -Me y e (Pepy I)” (Jones 2000: 378,
no. 1401; o mo e abou his i le, see Goedicke 1996),
wab aA, “g ea wab-p ies ” (Jones 2000: 369, no. 1362;
Fische 1964) and imy- A c xn y(w)-S p -aA, “o e see o
he depa men o enan -landholde s o he G ea House”
A CASE STUDY ON KHENTYTJENENET PES XVII/2016 37
Tab. 1 Lis o Old Kingdom holde s o i les and epi he s ela ed o he god Khen y jenene . Thei occu ence is cha ac e is ic o he second hal
o he Old Kingdom
pe sonal name hem-ne je -p ies
o Khen y jenene e e ed wi h
Khen y jenene place o bu ial dynas y/king
P ahshepses x Saqqa a [C 1] mid 5/Nyuse e
Sabu Ibebi x Saqqa a [E 1–2] ea ly 6/Te i
Se ekhu I ji x ? Abusi [AS 68, Sha 14] la e 6
He epuni x x Abusi [AS 68, Sha 8 ?] la e 6/Pepy II
I i I enakh y x Abusi [unknown] la e 6
Qa (Junio )
Ne e me y e x Abusi [AS 17] la e 6/Pepy II
Khai (I) x Abusi [AS 68, Sha 4 o 12?] la e 6 o la e
Khai (II) x Abusi [unknown] la e 6 o la e
He epu x Saqqa a, o he eas o
Me e nebe ’s omb la e 6 o la e
Khunehes x unknown, p obably Saqqa a la e 6 o la e
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:41 S ánka 37
38 PES XVII/2016 A CASE STUDY ON KHENTYTJENENET
Fig. 2 The emains o he ex on a agmen o Se ekhu’s wooden co in show a pa o he name o Khen y jenene (d awing L. Vařeko á)
Cha 1 The Old Kingdom holde s o he i le and he epi he connec ed wi h he god Khen y jenene we e bu ied exclusi ely a Saqqa a and Abusi
Cha 2 The occu ence o Khen y jenene in he Old Kingdom pe iod. The i s e idence on he god comes om in he mid-Fi h Dynas y
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:41 S ánka 38
(Jones 2000: 241, no. 882; Fe el 2010). I is p obable ha
he alse doo had o iginally been placed abo e a sha
(numbe ed as 8), in o which i was h own. While no
emains o he bu ial equipmen we e ound in he bu ial
niche, he ill o he sha con ained agmen s o po e y
essels. Mos analogies o hese pa icula essels a e
associa ed wi h he Six h Dynas y, especially wi h Pepy I,
bu some o he analogies su i ed un il he eign o
Pepy II. An analysis o he ea u es o He epuni’s alse
doo da es i o he la e Six h Dynas y, o possibly he Fi s
In e media e Pe iod ( ig. 1; o mo e in o ma ion abou
He epuni, see Dulíko á – A ias Ky na o á – Cílek 2014).
Se ekhu, whose good name was I ji, was also bu ied
wi hin he omb complex o P incess She e neb y [AS 68,
Sha 14]. The emains o he ex on his decomposing
wooden co in e y p obably include a pa o he i le
“hem-ne je -p ies o Khen y jenene ” ( ig. 2; based on he
ye unpublished ield documen a ion o he Czech mission
a Abusi Sou h). This indi idual could be iden ical wi h
he homonymous name o he son o he judge In i whose
mas aba lies nea by (Bá a – Vachala e al., o hcoming);
in i , Se ekhu is labelled as i y mDA (n) zAb, “judicial book
keepe ” (Jones 2000: 805–806, no. 2944).
The i le “hem-ne je -p ies o Khen y jene ” appea ed
a he a ely in ancien Egyp , p edominan ly in he Old
Kingdom (Lei z 2002: 876; see he summa izing cha 2).
Epi he “ e e ed wi h he god Khen y jenene ”
Besides one p ies ly i le, he god Khen y jenene occu ed
also as a pa o he epi he imAxw x #n y-*nn , “ e e ed
wi h he god Khen y jenene ” (Jones 2000: 36, no. 177) in
he Six h Dynas y (see ab. 1, cha s 1 and 2). Se e al
o icials in e ed in he same a ea as he a o e-men ioned
p ies s chose his epi he , i e a Abusi , one a Saqqa a
and one o unknown p o enance (p obably om Saqqa a).
He epuni is he only pe son who simul aneously bea s bo h
he i le and he epi he linked wi h Khen y jenene .
Ano he bea e o he epi he was a ce ain Khai (I),
cm Zk , “sem assis an o he god Soka ” (Jones 2000:
884–885, no. 3240). Khai was bu ied in She e neb y’s
cou ya d [AS 68, Sha 4 o 12]. His alse doo o a he
poo c a smanship ea u es he “in e ed T-shape panel”,
which occu s on a small numbe o s elae om he la e Old
Kingdom and he Fi s In e media e Pe iod. The ypology
o Khai’s alse doo , he iconog aphic, palaeog aphic
and epig aphic ea u es on he s ela, his pe sonal name,
he s a ig aphy in She e neb y’s cou ya d and he
whi ewashed cul place a e all indica i e o he la e Six h
Dynas y o he Fi s In e media e Pe iod ( ig. 3; o mo e
in o ma ion abou Khai, see Dulíko á 2013).
The alse doo o ano he indi idual wi h an iden ical
name as he p e iously men ioned one was ound as
a loose block du ing he au umn a chaeological season
A CASE STUDY ON KHENTYTJENENET PES XVII/2016 39
Fig. 3 The alse doo o Khai who was e e ed wi h Khen y jenene
(pho o M. F ouz, d awing J. Malá ko á)
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:42 S ánka 39
in 2015 a Abusi (9/AS79/2015, ye unpublished).
Al hough he insc ip ion on he s ela is hea ily soiled and
wai ing o es o a ion, a pa ly eadable ex has e ealed
he i le Spc ncw , “noble o he king” (Jones 2000: 988,
no. 3648), and wo epi he s: “ e e ed wi h he god
Khen y jenene ” and “ e e ed wi h he god P ah-Soka ”
(Jones 2000: 24, no. 14). Based on he ypology o he alse
doo , i s owne , Khai (II), can be da ed o he la e Six h
Dynas y o he Fi s In e media e Pe iod.
I i I enakh y buil his omb a Abusi Sou h in he
icini y o Vizie Qa ’s amily une a y complex (Bá a
e al. 2009; Bá a – Vachala e al., o hcoming). Relie
agmen s o wall deco a ion coming om his omb we e
ound as loose blocks in he omb complex o he sons o
Vizie Qa , bu he exac posi ion o his mas aba
has no been iden i ied ye (Dulíko á 2012). He wo ked
as imy- A c Xn y(w)-S p -aA, “o e see o he depa men o
enan -landholde s o he G ea House” (Jones 2000: 241,
no. 882) and cm p , “companion o he ( oyal) house”
(Jones 2000: 896, no. 3287). Apa om he epi he
connec ed wi h Khen y jenene , he used o he epi he s
linked o Osi is, P ah-Soka , Anubis and he g ea god.
Qa Ne e me y e, he eldes son o Vizie Qa , buil his
omb [AS 17] nex o he mas aba o his a he (Bá a
e al. 2009: 145–276). He se ed as Hm-nT MAa ,
“hem-ne je -p ies o Maa ” (Jones 2000: 516–517,
no. 1913), Nxn (n) zAb, “judicial o icial and mou h o
Nekhen” (Jones 2000: 808, no. 2953) and xn y-S Mn-n -
Ppy, “a endan o he py amid o Pepy I”. His only epi he
is connec ed wi h Khen y jenene .
He epu, bu ied in he icini y o Vizie Me e nebe ’s
omb a No h Saqqa a, is one o wo bea e s o he
Khen y jenene epi he in e ed ou side Abusi Sou h,
albei in i s immedia e neighbou hood (Ku aszkiewicz
2002: 52–54, Fig. 1, Pls. 12–13). He wo ked as cHD p -aA,
“inspec o o he G ea House” (Jones 2000: 924–925,
no. 3401). His o he epi he was imAxw x nT aA nb p ,
“ e e ed wi h he g ea god, he lo d o he sky” (Jones
2000: 31, no. 146).
Khunehes, whose place o bu ial is unknown, was
p obably bu ied somewhe e in Saqqa a (Bo cha d 1964:
139–140, Bl. 89). He held he i les X y- p ncw (n) p -aA,
“king’s liegeman o he G ea House” (Jones 2000: 789,
no. 2878), Spc ncw , “noble o he king” (Jones 2000: 988,
no. 3648) and cm p , “companion o he ( oyal) house”
(Jones 2000: 896, no. 3287). Besides he epi he connec ed
wi h Khen y jenene , he used an epi he linked o Osi is.
The ypology o Khunehes’s alse doo and his i les bea
ea u es o he Six h Dynas y.
Khen y jenene as pa o heopho ic pe sonal
names
Concu en ly wi h he p ies ly i le Hm-nT #n y-*nn , he
name o he god Khen y jenene occu ed wi hin pe sonal
names o se e al indi iduals who held o ices unde
Nyuse e and we e bu ied a Abusi o No h Saqqa a.
Theopho ic pe sonal names cons i u ed ca. 21% o all
pe sonal names in he Old Kingdom pe iod. In o al,
48 dei ies we e embodied in hese names; he mos
equen was he god P ah in 146 di e en names
(Scheele-Schwei ze 2014: 107–113). Fou pe sonal names
comp ising he elemen Khen y jenene a e a es ed o
males li ing p edominan ly du ing he eign o King
Nyuse e ( ab. 2).
The name Hem-Khen y jenene , “Se an o Khen y-
jenene ” (Ranke 1952: 305, no. 17; Gou don 2007: [471]
2; Scheele-Schwei ze 2014: 540 [2410]), is a es ed on
a agmen ha was o iginally pa o he elie deco a ion
o he mo ua y emple in he py amid complex o
Nyuse e a Abusi (Bo cha d 1907: 74, no. 60). No i le
has su i ed.
40 PES XVII/2016 A CASE STUDY ON KHENTYTJENENET
Tab. 2 Pe sonal names wi h he elemen Khen y jenene a e dis inc i e o he mid-Fi h o la e Fi h Dynas y
pe sonal name Ranke Gou don Scheele-
Schwei ze si e p o enance dynas y/
king
Hem-Khen y jenene
“Se an o
Khen y jenene ”
RPN II,
305,
no. 17
[471] 2 540/2410 Abusi
Nyuse e’s
mo ua y emple
[AC 4], elie
deco a ion
mid 5/
Nyuse e
I e -Khen y jenene
“Wha
Khen y jenene
did”
RPN I,
273,
no. 10
[88] 1
I -#n y-*nn ,
[557] 4
#n y-*nn -i
257/426
Abusi
mas aba o Vizie
P ahshepses
[AC 8], elie
deco a ion
mid 5/
Nyuse e
Saqqa a
mas aba o Duahep
[D 59], elie
deco a ion
mid 5/
Nyuse e
Washkai-Khen y jenene
“Khen y jenene ’s
ka is powe ull”
RPN I,
417,
no. 16
[161] 3 317/819 Saqqa a
mas aba o Vizie
Kai [D 19], elie
deco a ion
mid 5/
Nyuse e
Ny-Khen y jenene
“He who belongs
o Khen y jenene ”
– [324] 4 434/1643 Saqqa a
omb o Tje u
P ahhe ep, elie
deco a ion
la e 5
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:42 S ánka 40

The name I e -Khen y jenene , “Wha Khen y jenene
did”, is a es ed wice in he Old Kingdom (Ranke 1935:
273, no. 10; Gou don 2007: [88] 1 and [557] 4; Scheele-
Schwei ze 2014: 257 [426]).3Fi s ly, he bea e o his
name is pic u ed in he wall deco a ion o he mas aba
o Vizie P ahshepses, in he scene o he d agging o wo
o P ahshepses’s s a ues. I e -Khen y jenene is depic ed
wi h he i les zS (n) zAb and Hm-kA walking behind he
sledge oge he wi h a man named Duahep, who bea s ou
i les: zS (n) zAb, cHD Hm(w)-kA, wab ncw and H y-cS A
(Ve ne 1986: 110, Insc . Nos. 166 and 167, Pl. 60). Apa
o I e -Khen y jenene ’s name is also a es ed on a elie
agmen (Vachala 2004: 76–77, F agmen H 114). Sec-
ondly, I e -Khen y jenene appea s o be designa ed as he
eldes son o Duahep wi h he i le zS (n) zAb in he omb
o his a he a Saqqa a [D 59] (Ma ie e 1889: 337), wes
o he S ep Py amid, nea he omb complex o he izie ial
amily o Akhe he ep and P ahhe ep. I is wo h no icing
ha his omb ea u ed no only his new mino god bu also
he majo god Osi is ( o he wo k ac i i ies o his amily,
see ig. 5; o he lis o indi iduals in oking Osi is, see
Dulíko á 2016: Table 6.1).
I is e iden ha he owne o mas aba D 59, Duahep,
and his eldes son, I e -Khen y jenene , a e he same
indi iduals who a e depic ed nex o each o he in he
mas aba o Vizie P ahshepses, al hough hey a e po ayed
he e wi hou any amily ela ion label. Duahep and I e -
Khen y jenene we e con empo a ies o P ahshepses and
pa o hei p oduc i e li es coincided wi h he ime when
P ahshepses pe o med he izie ial o ice ( o an analysis
o hei p o essional ca ego iza ion, see Appendix).
Ano he name connec ed wi h he god, Khen y jenene ,
is Washkai-Khen y jenene “Khen y jenene ’s ka is
powe ul” (Ranke 1935: 417, no. 16; Gou don 2007:
[161] 3; Scheele-Schwei ze 2014: 317 [819]). The
indi idual wi h his name was he eldes son o Vizie
Kai and is eco ded in his omb a No h Saqqa a
[No. 63 = D 19] on his alse doo (Ma ie e 1889: 229).
Washkai-Khen y jenene began his ca ee in he
adminis a i e sphe e as zS a(w) nw ncw x -H , “sc ibe o
he oyal eco ds in he p esence” (Jones 2000: 839–840,
no. 3063) and cHD zS (n) zAb, “inspec o o judicial sc ibes”
(Jones 2000: 814, no. 297).
The las pe sonal name ha includes he elemen ,
Khen y jenene , is Ny-Khen y jenene , “He who belongs
o Khen y jenene ” (Ranke no a es ed; Gou don 2007:
[324] 4; Scheele-Schwei ze 2014: 434 [1643]). Ny-
-Khen y jenene is depic ed among he bea e s o o e ings
in he mas aba o Tje u P ahhe ep, labelled as wab-p ies
o P ahhe ep (Hassan 1975: 105, 108, Fig. 56). The
unnumbe ed omb lies a No h Saqqa a, o he wes o
he S ep Py amid, in he close icini y o he mas aba
o he a o e-men ioned Duahep.
E en hough he s a us o amily ela ions o he bea e s
o Khen y jenene -names a e known om he monumen s
o hei ela i es o o hose whom hey se ed ( he
py amid complex o Nyuse e, he mas aba o Vizie
P ahshepses and he omb o Tje u P ahhe ep, a supposed
membe o he izie ial amily o “P ahhe eps”), hei
places o bu ial emain unknown. The ombs o hese men
a e loca ed mos p obably a No h Saqqa a.
Fune a y domains and o he e idence
The name o he god Khen y jenene occu ed wi hin he
names o une a y domains o es a es in connec ion wi h
h ee subsequen ule s: Djedka e Isesi, Unas and Te i.
Khen y jenene appea s once in he oyal con ex ,
i.e. wi hin he names o he oyal es a e and he oyal
domain in he py amid complex o Unas a Saqqa a:
M #n y-*nn -anx Wnic, “Khen y jenene desi es Unas
o li e” (Jacque -Go don 1962: 172); @w Wnic: Ny i
Wnic #n y-*nn , “Es a e o Unas: Wha Unas does
belongs o Khen y jenene ”. The place was p obably
si ua ed in he 7 h nome o Lowe Egyp (Jacque -Go don
1962: 169).
Khen y jenene is a es ed wice in a non- oyal con ex ,
wi hin he une a y domain p ocessions in he ombs o
wo indi iduals. The name M #n y-*nn anx Izzi,
“Khen y jenene desi es Isesi o li e” occu ed in he omb
o Kaipu e, bu ied a Saqqa a [No. 22 = D 39] and da ed
o he eign o Djedka e Isesi. The o he names o une -
a y domains a e ela ed o he omb owne (Ma ie e
1889: 276; Jacque -Go don 1962: 374). He wo ked p e-
dominan ly in he sphe e o he easu y.
Khen y jenene occu ed ou imes in he p ocession o
emale une a y domains in he mas aba o he judge In i,
bu ied a Abusi Sou h [AS 22], he son o Vizie Qa
[AS 17].4All su i ing a es a ions o he es a es a e
associa ed wi h he name o King Te i and he domains
wi h Khen y jenene a e no excep ion. The name M #n y-
*nn anx & i, “Khen y jenene desi es Te i o li e” occu ed
h ee imes on he wes e n wall o he omb en ance. The
second une a y domain is called Ny n i & i #n y-*nn ,
“Wha good Te i does belongs o Khen y jenene ”. In i
li ed du ing he eigns o Kings Pepy I and Pepy II
(Bá a – Vachala e al., o hcoming).
Apa om he abo e-men ioned occu ences,
Khen y jenene is a es ed on a agmen o papy us om
Ne e i ka e’s papy us a chi e (Posene -K iége – Ceni al
1968: Pl. LXXXA). The insc ip ion s a s wi h he
enume a ion o dei ies: [x #n y]-*nn x +d-Spc x nT w
nbw, e c. This papy us is da ed o he eign o Djedka e
Isesi (Posene -K iége 1976: 453–455).
Conclusions
The p e iously spa se e idence on Khen y jenene has
been ma kedly enla ged owing o he new exca a ions
pe o med by he Czech a chaeological mission a Abusi
Sou h. A ecen ly disco e ed clus e o indi iduals holding
p ies ly i les and/o epi he s e e ing o Khen y jenene
has gi en us an impe us o sc u inising his dei y.5
The eco ded e idence o Khen y jenene is closely
connec ed wi h a speci ic geog aphical pa o he
Memphi e nec opolis – Abusi and No h Saqqa a. The
dis ance be ween all he monumen s men ioning he god
Khen y jenene is app oxima ely 3 kilome es in he no h-
sou h axis, om he mas aba o Vizie P ahshepses a
Abusi Cen e No h o he py amid o Unas a Cen al
Saqqa a (see ig. 4).
The dei y, whose appea ance was ob iously associa ed
wi h he social, eligious and adminis a i e changes
A CASE STUDY ON KHENTYTJENENET PES XVII/2016 41
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:42 S ánka 41
42 PES XVII/2016 A CASE STUDY ON KHENTYTJENENET
Fig. 4 Saqqa a-Abusi a ea wi h he highligh ed ombs wi h occu ences o Khen y jenene ’s name da ed o he Old Kingdom pe iod: 1 P ahsepses,
2 Nyuse e’s mo ua y emple, 3 Ne e i ka e’s mo ua y emple, 4 I i I enakh y, 5 Qa Junio , 6 Khai (II), 7 In i, 8 Khai (I), 9 He epuni, 10 Se ekhu I ji,
11 Kaipu e, 12 Sabu Ibebi, 13 P ahsepses [C 1], 14 Kai, 15 Tje u P ahhe ep, 16 Duahep, 17 He epu, 18 Unas’s mo ua y emple
(V. B ůna – V. Dulíko á)
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:42 S ánka 42
A CASE STUDY ON KHENTYTJENENET PES XVII/2016 43
du ing he eign o Nyuse e, was also e lec ed in
heopho ic pe sonal names o ha pe iod, which ei he
exp ess he holde ’s ela ion o Khen y jenene as he god’s
se an (“He who belongs o Khen y jenene ”, “Se an o
Khen y jenene ”), o show Khen y jenene as a mo ing
o ce (“Khen y jenene ’s ka is powe ul”). Whe eas
pe sonal names compounded wi h he elemen , Khen y-
jenene , we e cha ac e is ic o he mid-Fi h Dynas y, he
i le “hem-ne je -p ies o Khen y jene ” occu ed only
spo adically in he Fi h Dynas y pe iod. This i le is
a es ed du ing he ollowing dynas y, which is also he
ime when he epi he imakhu khe linked o Khen y jene
appea ed, mo e p ecisely in he la e Six h Dynas y. Thus,
he i le and epi he s suppo an ongoing cul o he god
Khen y jene ha was bound o he Saqqa a-Abusi a ea
(see cha 1).
Taking in o accoun he spa ial dis ibu ion o Old
Kingdom e idence on Khen y jenene , e idence on
a sanc ua y o his god in he Middle Kingdom
(Al enmülle 2015: 249) and a much la e insc ip ion on
a s ela coming om he Pe sian pe iod deposi ed in he
Se apeum, which men ions a emple o Khen y jene
(Holmbe g 1946: 217; Leahy 1998), we can o mula e
a hypo hesis abou he exis ence o a “house” de o ed o
his dei y, loca ed in he a ea o No h Saqqa a. And zej
Ćwiek sugges ed ha he cha ac e o he enigma ic name
o Khen y jenene “Fo emos o Tjenene ” could simply
e e o he S ep Py amid complex o Ne je ykhe (And zej
Ćwiek, pe sonal communica ion).
Appendix: The da ing o Duahep and his son
I e -Khen y jenene
Duahep, who occupied posi ions in he depa men o
jus ice and se e al p ies ly unc ions, buil his omb [D 59]
o he wes o he S ep Py amid in he mid-Fi h Dynas y
(Ma ie e 1889: 335–339) (see ig. 5). Duahep held mainly
p ies ly unc ions: he se ed as Hm-nT -p ies o he
goddess Maa (Jones 2000: 516–517, no. 1930), o he god
Ho akh y (Jones 2000: 551, no. 2046), o King Ne e i ka e
(Jones 2000: 554, no. 2054), o he sun emples o Kings
Ne e i ka e and Nyuse e (Jones 2000: 537, no. 2005 and
538, no. 2006), o Nyuse e’s py amid (Jones 2000: 519,
no. 1939) and as “wab-p ies o he king”. His adminis a i e
i les we e exclusi ely connec ed wi h legal ma e s. He
eached he highes deg ee o he o e see in he a ea o
judicial sc ibes: imy- A zS (n) zAb (Jones 2000: 803, no. 2933)
and wo ked as x p zS(w) i y(w) iaH/cp w, “di ec o o sc ibes
connec ed wi h he moon” (Jones 2000: 739–740, no. 2697).
Fu he mo e, he was H y cS A n nT . , “p i y o he sec e (s)
o his god (i.e. he king)” (Jones 2000: 632–633, no. 2316).
This kind o “secu i y clea ance” wi h nT . , exis ing om
he eign o Nyuse e onwa ds, indica es ha Duahep had
he p i ilege o being in he p oximi y o he ule . Based on
he published documen a ion o Duahep’s mas aba, i is
e iden ha he monumen has su i ed only pa ially, he
deco a ion o he açade and pa s o he o e ing oom.
Un o una ely, he e is no a chaeological documen a ion
e ealing ha his alse doo has su i ed, o ins ance.
I is hus mo e han ob ious ha Duahep’s i ula y mus
ha e been mo e ex ensi e and he possibly occupied
mo e posi ions wi hin he adminis a ion. Duahep’s eldes
son, I e -Khen y jenene , held he i le zS (n) zAb in he omb
o his a he (Ma ie e 1889: 337).
The name o Duahep in connec ion wi h he i le zS (n)
zAb can be ound wi hin he builde s’ insc ip ions on he
s one blocks o he mas aba o Vizie P ahshepses (Ve ne
1992: insc . nos. 28, 43, 120). He was also po ayed in
he elie scenes on he wall o he omb o his izie ,
labelled as zS (n) zAb, cHD Hm(w)-kA, wab ncw and
H y-cS A ( ig. 6; Ve ne 1986: 110, insc . nos. 166 and 167,
Pl. 60). Duahep is depic ed he e oge he wi h his son
Fig. 5 Known amily ela ions and
he i ula y o he digni a y
Duahep, bu ied a Saqqa a
( isualiza ion by R. Mařík)
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:42 S ánka 43
44 PES XVII/2016 A CASE STUDY ON KHENTYTJENENET
I e -Khen y jenene , who is endowed wi h he i les
zS (n) zAb and Hm-kA (Ve ne 1986: Insc . No. 167, Pl. 60;
Vachala 2004: 76–77, F agmen H 114). E en hough he
amily ela ion be ween hese wo indi iduals is no
explici ly w i en in hie oglyphs on he walls o
P ahshepses’s mas aba, he iconog aphical exp ession – I e -
Khen y jenene is ollowing his a he Duahep – and
iden ical i les as hose in Duahep’s omb es i y o i . An
analogous case om he mas aba o his izie shows he
b o he s, Nyankhkhnum and Khnumhe ep, depic ed nex
o each o he like o e ing bea e s, also wi hou any label
indica ing hei amily ela ion (c . Ve ne 1986: Insc .
No. 75, Pl. 34).
While Be ha Po e , Rosalind Moss and Ja omí Málek
da ed Duahep o he Six h Dynas y (Po e – Moss – Málek
1979: 595), all indica ions – analyses o his i les and o
he occu ences o his name – sugges ha he li ed in he
eign o King Nyuse e in he mid-Fi h Dynas y.
No es:
1I would like o exp ess my g a i ude o e e yone who has p o ided me
s imula ing commen s on he p esen ed issue, especially o And zej Ćwiek
and wo anonymous pee - e iewe s. This s udy was w i en wi hin he
p ojec o GA ČR, No. 16-07210S: “Complex ne wo k me hods applied
o ancien Egyp da a in he Old Kingdom (2700–2180 BC)”.
2Vale ia Tu iziani (2014) has deal wi h mino gods in he Old Kingdom
pe iod in he Ph.D. p ojec , bu no esul s ha e been published ye , excep
o a sho compila ion a icle.
3In spi e o he ac ha he name is w i en iden ically in he wall
deco a ion o he wo mas abas and ep esen s a single pe son, Yannis
Gou don eads he name, I e -Khen y jenene , in wo ways in his excellen
wo k: as I e -Khen y jenene (Gou don 2007: [88] 1) and as Khen y-
jenene -i e (Gou don 2007: [557] 4). Thus he name is lis ed wice as
wo di e en names.
4The elie scene has no been published ye . The monog aph on In i’s omb
is cu en ly unde p epa a ion (Bá a – Vachala e al., o hcoming).
5This case s udy on Khen y jenene is based on an a icle published in he
Czech language, which deals wi h one o he p ies s ecen ly disco e ed a
Abusi Sou h (Dulíko á – A ias Ky na o á – Cílek 2014), and on he chap e
de o ed o he eligious inno a ion du ing he eign o he King Nyuse e,
Fig. 6 Duahep was a
con empo a y o Vizie
P ahshepses; he was po ayed
in P ahshepses’s omb oge he
wi h his son I e -Khen y jenene
(d awing L. Vařeko á)
PES XVII_2016_s udied_36-78_PES 13.12.16 11:42 S ánka 44