scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Analysis of spatial heterogeneity in normal epithelium and preneoplastic alterations in mouse prostate tumor models

Read accessible full text

Analysis of spatial heterogeneity in normal epithelium and preneoplastic alterations in mouse prostate tumor models

Author: Valkonen, Mira,Ruusuvuori, Pekka,Kartasalo, Kimmo,Nykter, Matti,Visakorpi, Tapio,Latonen, Leena
Year: 2017
Source: https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/10024/100860/1/analysis-Of_spatial_2017.pdf
1
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s
Analysis o spa ial he e ogenei y
in no mal epi helium and
p eneoplas ic al e a ions in mouse
p os a e umo models
Mi a Valkonen1,*, Pekka Ruusu uo i1,2,*, Kimmo Ka asalo1,3, Ma i Nyk e 1, Tapio Visako pi1,4
& Leena La onen1,4
Cance in ol es his ological changes in issue, which is o p ima y impo ance in pa hological diagnosis
and esea ch. Au oma ed his ological analysis equi es abili y o compu a ionally sepa a e pa hological
al e a ions om no mal issue wi h all i s a iables. On he o he hand, unde s anding connec ions
be ween gene ic al e a ions and his ological a ibu es equi es de elopmen o enhanced analysis
me hods sui able also o small sample sizes. He e, we se ou o de elop compu a ional me hods o
ea ly de ec ion and dis inc ion o p os a e cance - ela ed pa hological al e a ions. We use analysis o
ea u es om HE s ained his ological images o no mal mouse p os a e epi helium, dis inguishing he
desc ip o s o a iabili y be ween en al, la e al, and do sal lobes. In addi ion, we use wo common
p os a e cance models, Hi-Myc and P en+/− mice, o build a ea u e-based machine lea ning model
sepa a ing he ea ly pa hological lesions p o oked by hese gene ic al e a ions. This wo k o e s a
se o compu a ional me hods o sepa a ion o ea ly neoplas ic lesions in he p os a es o model
mice, and p o ides p oo -o -p inciple o linking speci ic umo geno ypes o quan i a i e his ological
cha ac e is ics. The esul s ob ained show ha sepa a ion be ween di e en spa ial loca ions wi hin
he o gan, as well as classi ica ion be ween his ologies linked o di e en gene ic backg ounds, can be
pe o med wi h e y high speci ici y and sensi i i y.
Tissue his ology is one o he main de e minan s in s udying and diagnosing many pa hologies, including cance .
Solid umo s change he s uc u e o he issue due o al e ed mo phologies and localiza ions o umo cells wi hin
he no mal issue. His opa hology is adi ionally a e y in ui i e me hod, whe e decisions a e mos o en based
on isual inspec ion. O en, howe e , abili y o objec i ely ecognize and quan i y pa hological changes in issue
his ology would be desi ed. Fu he mo e, gaining he decisi e pa hological in o ma ion om basic his ological
s ainings, mos o en hema oxylin and eosin (HE), would help o a oid using cos ly special s ainings. Se e al
cu en app oaches aim o de elop ools o help clinical pa hologis s o de e mine p esence o s a e o a pa icula
lesion om HE-s ained images, e.g. o s age cance o diagnos ic and p ognos ic pu poses1,2. Ye , a p essing need
o diagnose cance a ea lie s ages conce ns se e al cance ypes, e.g. p os a e cance and b eas cance ; when
umo s a e s ill small and changes in hem mo e benign, ea men op ions and p ognoses a e be e . Abili y o
ecognize and quan i y small and sub le changes in issue mo phology a e c ucial also o basic and p eclinical
esea ch aiming o iden i y ea ly changes p eceding and leading o malignan s ages o cance .
To be able o quan i y changes in issue mo phology, measu able de e minan s o he pa hology in ques ion
need o be de e mined. Key ques ions a e how o di e en ia e be ween no mal and pa hological issue, how o
measu e he s age o he pa hological change, and e en how o di e en ia e be ween se e al possible ypes o
change, e.g. sub ypes o cance . Fo example, accu a e sepa a ion o pa hologies om no mal issue his ology
equi es unde s anding and inclusion o all s a es and a iables o he no mal issue, whe he o igina ing om
1P os a e Cance Resea ch Cen e , Facul y o Medicine and Li e Sciences and BioMediTech, Uni e si y o Tampe e,
Tampe e, Finland. 2Tampe e Uni e si y o Technology, Po i, Finland. 3BioMediTech Ins i u e and Facul y o
Biomedical Sciences and Enginee ing, Tampe e Uni e si y o Technology, Tampe e, Finland. 4Fimlab Labo a o ies,
Tampe e Uni e si y Hospi al, Tampe e, Finland. *These au ho s con ibu ed equally o his wo k. Co espondence
and eques s o ma e ials should be add essed o L.L. (email: [email p o ec ed])
Recei ed: 28 Decembe 2016
accep ed: 13 Feb ua y 2017
Published: 20 Ma ch 2017
OPEN
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
2
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
cha ac e is ics o he issue i sel , o echnical a ia ion due o e.g. o ien a ion o he his ological sec ion cu el-
a i e o issue s uc u es.
In cance esea ch, ecen yea s o nex -gene a ion sequencing ha e e ealed he ex en o gene ic and gene
exp ession al e a ions in cance 3,4. Howe e , he pheno ypic e ec s o many gene ic al e a ions and hei com-
bina ions is s ill unde esea ch. The common goal is o be able o sub ype umo s be e o enhanced pa ien
s a i ica ion and ca e in he u u e. Combina ion o gene ic in o ma ion wi h his ology, howe e , equi es ha
he his ological in o ma ion can be ans o med in o a quan i a i e, objec i e o m. This can be achie ed h ough
digi al imaging and compu a ional analysis o he his ological cha ac e is ics. While compu a ional image in o -
ma ics can p o ide a ple ho a o quan i ied desc ip o s o a gi en image, he challenge in his ology is o so ou
he ele an cha ac e is ics which can be p esen ed in he o m o use ul ea u e ep esen a ions.
Fea u e-based analysis combined wi h supe ised lea ning has been a common app oach in decision suppo
sys ems and compu e aided diagnosis based on whole slide images1,5,6,. Such app oaches ha e been success ully
used o quan i a i ely desc ibing cha ac e is ics o p os a e his ology in neoplas ic lesions bo h o a mouse
model7 and o human issue8. Howe e , p e ious s udies ha e le oom o imp o ed ea u e enginee ing and
classi ica ion pe o mance.
We aim a imp o ing his ological ecogni ion and quan i ica ion o pa hological ea u es in p os a e cance ,
and sea ch o desc ip o s o di e en ia e ea ly pa hological lesions om no mal p os a e issue. Fu he mo e, he
goal is o sepa a e gene ically di e en ypes o ea ly neoplas ic changes om each o he . In he e, we use wo clas-
sical and popula gene ic p os a e cance mouse models, namely he e ozygous P en9 and Hi-Myc10, o pe o m
quan i a i e image analysis on ea ly neoplasms compa ed o no mal mouse p os a ic issue. Wi h a compu a ional
sepa a ion o hund eds o ea u es om he whole slide images o his ological issue sec ions and a andom o es
based machine lea ning app oach, we ind a combina ion o issue ea u es able o dis inguish be ween 1) no mal
spa ial he e ogenei y in he p os a e issue, 2) ea ly P en+ /− o Hi-Myc-induced neoplasms om no mal issue,
and 3) he wo ypes o neoplasms om each o he . Ou s udy se es as he i s s ep owa ds de eloping ools
o au oma ed analysis o ea ly neoplas ic changes in p os a e issue and hei linkage o di e en gene ic g oups.
Resul s
Spa ial a ia ion in epi helium o no mal p os a e. Fi s , we wan ed o assess no mal spa ial a ia ion
in he his ology o he p os a e. Mouse co e p os a e can be di ided in h ee lobula a eas: en al p os a e (VP),
la e al p os a e (LP) and do sal p os a e (DP), which su ound he u e h a (Fig.1A). All h ee lobes a e domi-
na ed by p os a e acini co e ed wi h an epi helial cell laye and a e su ounded by a basemen memb ane and
loose connec i e issue. Be ween he lobes, sub le di e ences exis in he o ganiza ion and di ec ion o he acina
ubes, somewha a ec ing he appea ance and lumen size o acini in his ological p epa a ions. The epi helium
is o speci ic ele ance due o being he issue componen whe e p os a e cance s o igina e om. The no mal
appea ance o he epi helium a ies be ween he di e en lobes (Fig.1A). Epi helium in he DP is columna , cy o-
plasm is ela i ely eosinophilic, and he nuclei a e cen ally o basally loca ed. The epi helium can be u ed. LP
epi helium has only spa se in oldings. The cells a e cuboidal o low columna , and he nuclei a e small, uni o m
and basally loca ed. VP has only ocal epi helial u ing. The cells a e cuboidal o columa , and he cy oplasm is
less eosinophilic. Nuclei a e small and basally loca ed (Fig.1A).
We manually selec ed 227 acini o ep esen a ia ion in p os a e epi helium in his ological sec ions, including
bo h he he e ogenei y in no mal appea ance o he issue, and he echnical a iance (e.g. acini cu in di e en
o ien a ions). Fo hese images, we pe o med p ep ocessing o, o example, co ec colo a ia ion ac oss he
issue samples, and o exclude a eas no including issue (e.g. emp y and sec e ion-con aing a eas inside he acini)
(Fig.1B). We applied colo decon olu ion o sepa a e hema oxylin and eosin s ains as sepa a e colo channels,
and pe o med nuclea segmen a ion. The esul ing image in o ma ion we used o compu e a compila ion o 241
ea u es (lis ed in Supplemen a yTable1). These ea u es included nume ous desc ip o s ela ed o issue ex u e
and local en i onmen s, as well as nume ic ep esen a ions o p ope ies, spa ial a angemen , and dis ibu ion o
nuclei. When hese 241 ea u es a e used o ep esen he samples in dimension- educing -Dis ibu ed S ochas ic
Neighbo Embedding ( -SNE)11 plo , he ex en o he ex ac able spa ial a ia ion be ween he no mal lobes o
he p os a e is shown (Fig.1C). While he VP sha es cha ac e is ics wi hin he ange o LP, he DP is mo e clea ly
dis inguished om he o he lobes.
Quan i a i e cha ac e is ics o mPIN lesions. To s udy dis inc ion o small pa hological changes om
no mal epi helium, we wan ed o compa e no mal issue o ea ly pa hological lesions. Mice he e ozygous o
umo supp esso P en o m mouse p os a ic in aepi helial neoplasia (mPIN) wi hin 8–12 mon hs9. In he e, we
used p os a e samples om P en+ /− mice o 10-11 mon hs, when ecognizable mPIN is e iden (Fig.2A).
We selec ed 199 a eas o mPIN, and pe o med image p ocessing and ea u e compu a ion as abo e. A -SNE
plo (Fig.2B) shows ha he PIN lesions o di e en p os a e lobes a e mixed a he han sepa a ed as lobe-speci ic
clus e s. This indica es ha , compa ed o no mal epi helium, he spa ial he e ogenei y is dec eased in mPIN
(compa e Fig.2B o Fig.1C). When compa ing he ela i e dis ibu ions o no mal epi helium and mPIN lesions,
PIN a eas a e clea ly sepa a e om no mal issue a eas by he compu ed compila ion o ea u es (Fig.2C). When
compa ing he di e en p os a ic lobes, i is e iden ha LP is u hes and DP closes o PIN lesions based on he
compu ed ea u e p o ile, co esponding o he issue cha ac e is ics obse ed by eye (Fig.2A).
To es whe he he compu ed ea u e cha ac e is ics can be used o eliably sepa a e mPIN lesions om no -
mal epi helium, we applied machine lea ning. We de eloped a andom o es based model and applied i in
lea e-one-ou c oss alida ion (LOOCV) o es ima e he p obabili y o a sample o belong o he g oup o PIN
lesions based on he ea u e da a. Figu e3A shows he classi ica ion con idence gi en by he machine lea ning
model o each sample o belong o he g oup o PIN. The accu acy o he es ima ions by he model was analysed
using ecei e ope a ing cha ac e is ic (ROC) cu e, om which he a ea unde cu e (AUC) measu e can be
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
3
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
used o quan i ying he sepa a ion be ween he no mal and p eneoplas ic issues (Fig.3B; AUC 0.988). P edic o
impo ances o 20 mos in luen ial ea u es in he model o dis inquish be ween he mo phology ypes a e shown
in Fig.3C. These ea u e impo ances we e gi en by a model ha was ained wi h all a ailable samples.
F om he LOOCV expe imen , used o alida e he obus ness o ou andom o es model, we collec ed
al oge he 426 models om which he a e age impo ances a e shown in Supplemen a yFigu e1. The a e aged
ea u e impo ance lis con ains a simila se o ea u es as ha gi en by he o iginal model ained wi h all a ail-
able samples (Fig.3C). These include se e al ypes o ex u e ea u es, such as LBPs and SIFT- ea u es. Nuclea
ea u es include se e al desc ip o s o nuclea size, densi y and neighbou hood (NhoodMaxDis , NhoodS dDis ,
HhoodSkewness, meanNucSize, meanNucDis InNucNB, NhoodMeanDis ). Ano he se o impo an ea u es
a e he ea u es desc ibing he ela i e posi ions and o ien a ions o he nuclei (NhoodNucAngleSkewABS,
NhoodNucAngleKu ABS, NhoodNucAngleVa , NhoodNucAngleS d0). These cap u e he dis inc i e p ope y
o no mal epi helial issue, whe e nuclei a e mos o en o ien ed as “beads in a ow” as opposed o sca e ed dis-
ibu ion in a umo (Supplemen alFig.2).
We u he es ed he abili y o he model o dis inguish mPIN om no mal epi helium in each lobe
(Supplemen a yFigu e3). Acco ding o he di e en incidence o mPIN in he p os a ic lobes in he P en+ / −
model mice, he numbe o mPIN samples in he analysis a ied be ween lobes being g ea es in LP and lowes in
VP (no mal epi helium and mPIN nVP = 37, nLP = 282, nDP = 107). PIN was dis inguished om no mal p os a e
mos accu a ely in LP (AUC 0.997), likely due o he clea pheno ypic di e ence in he his ology. mPIN in VP
and DP we e simila ly challenging, al hough wi h hese, ela i ely small sample se s, a e y high accu acy was s ill
eached (AUC 0.972).
Compu a ional dis inc ion be ween his ologies o di e en gene ic g oups. High exp ession o
oncogenic Myc in he mouse p os a e induces neoplas ic lesions isible al eady a 1 mon h o age10. These lesions
de elop la e on o adenoca cinoma, in con as o he mPIN in he P en+ / − he e ozygous mice which does
no de elop in o ca cinoma wi hou addi ional gene ic o ca cinogenic manipula ion9. We wan ed o compa e
hese wo ypes o ea ly neoplasms wi h gene ic di e ences, and o ind compu a ional ea u es sepa a ing hem
om each o he and om he no mal epi helium. As mos o he umo s in hese models o m in he LP, we
Figu e 1. Quan i a i e image analysis o no mal mouse p os a e his ology. (A) Gene al appea ance o
mouse p os a e in a his ological sec ion (la ge image) and a ia ion in he appea ance o no mal epi helium
wi hin h ee lobula a eas o mouse co e p os a e: en al p os a e (VP), la e al p os a e (LP) and do sal p os a e
(DP) (small images). U e h a (U) and he muscle laye (ml) su ounding i a e ma ked. Scale ba s: 1 mm
(la ge image) and 25 μm (small images). (B) O e iew o he image analysis wo k low ha includes masking
o ROI, co ec ing colo a ia ion using his og am ma ching, excluding a eas no including issue, sepa a ing
hema oxylin and eosin s ains, segmen ing cell nuclei, and ex ac ing quan i a i e ea u e da a. (C) A -SNE plo
p esen ing he spa ial a ia ion o quan i a i e ea u es in he epi helium be ween he no mal mouse p os a e
lobes (VP, LP, DP).
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
4
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
concen a ed on his issue a ea selec ing only LP samples om P en+ /− model mice (no mal epi heliu n = 137,
mPIN n = 145), and manually selec ed samples om LP o Hi-Myc mice (no mal epi helium n = 111, mPIN
n = 189). Examples o ep esen a i e his ologies on no mal and p eneoplas ic LP epi helium a e shown in Fig.4A.
As he wo p eneoplas ic change ypes occu a di e en ages, ou samples om he wo di e en models
ep esen ed p os a e epi helium om mice o e y di e en age (10–11 mon hs in P en+ /− mice compa ed o 1
mon h in Hi-Myc mice). Thus, o ensu e consis ency and compa abili y o he da a om hiMyc and P en+ /− is-
sues, we selec ed ea u es whose dis ibu ions did no show s a is ically signi ican di e ence ( h eshold α = 0.05)
acco ding o Kolmogo o -Smi no es in he wo con ol g oups o use in he u he analysis. Al oge he 59 ea-
u es ul illed he c i e ion (Supplemen a yTable2, Supplemen a yFigu e4). I is e iden al eady by he ea u e
Figu e 2. Quan i a i e cha ac e is ics o mouse PIN. (A) Examples o p os a ic acini con aining no mal
epi helium and PIN lesions om he h ee lobula a eas (VP, LP, DP). (B) Rep esen a ion o he quan i a i e
ea u es o PIN lesions in h ee mouse p os a e lobes (VP, LP, DP) in wo-dimensional ea u e space using
-SNE. (C) A -SNE isualisa ion e eals dec easing spa ial he e ogenei y in PIN lesions compa ed o no mal
epi helium in he mouse p os a e.
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
5
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
alues ha he h ee g oups o samples ha e hei own, dis inc signa u es (Fig.4B). Fu he mo e, hese g oups
a e clea ly dis inguished in ep esen a ion o he samples acco ding o he ea u e alues in -SNE (Fig.4B).
We de eloped a machine lea ning model based on he selec ed subse o ea u es o es ima e he p obabili y o
a sample o belong o any o he h ee g oups (no mal epi helium, P en he e ozygous mPIN, o Hi-Myc-induced
ea ly neoplasia). The model is success ul in p edic ing accu a ely he his ological classes o he samples, as shown
in a con usion ma ix o he p edic ions (Fig.5A) and a ROC-cu e o accu acy analysis (Fig.5B; AUC 0.997 o
no mal, 0.990 o P en+ /− , and 0.995 o Hi-Myc). Simila ly as in dis inguishing mPIN om no mal epi helium,
he p edic o impo ances o he mos aluable ea u es in his andom o es model (Fig.5C) include nuclea
densi y and angle- ela ed ea u es (NhoodNucAngleKu ABS; NhoodMeanDis , numbe O NucInNucNB). As
expec ed, howe e , he sepa a ion o wo mo phologically di e en neoplas ic his ologies b ings ea u es cap-
u ing mo e de ailed ex u al in o ma ion om he s ain in ensi ies and om nuclea densi y map o he op lis
o ea u es (e.g. Densi yLBP6, LBP4H). These emain in he lis o mos in luen ial ea u es e en when a e aging
he p edic o impo ances o 582 ainings o he andom o es model (Supplemen a yFigu e5), and p o ide
de ailed, quan i a i e in o ma ion o he di e ences be ween Hi-Myc and P en+ /− -p o oked ea ly neoplasms
(Fig.5D).
Discussion
Au oma ic ecogni ion and quan i a i e analysis o issue pa hologies equi es ways o compu a ionally iden i y
ep esen a i e his ological ea u es sepa a ing no mal and al e ed issue. In his wo k, we ex ac ed a se o 241
ea u es om images o p os a e issue, and used hem o analyze spa ial he e ogenei y wi hin no mal p os a e, as
well as o sepa a e di e en ypes o ea ly neoplas ic changes om no mal issue and om each o he . Ou esul s
show ha sepa a ion be ween di e en spa ial loca ions wi hin he o gan, as well as classi ica ion be ween his ol-
ogies p o oked by di e en gene ic lesions, can be pe o med wi h e y high speci ici y and sensi i i y.
We applied adi ional machine lea ning app oach based on ex ac ion o a la ge se o enginee ed ea u es
ollowed by a andom o es ensemble classi ie . Gi en he e y high accu acy ob ained o he ela i ely low
numbe o samples and small size o egions o in e es , his app oach appea s o be well jus i ied. Recen ly, neu al
ne wo k based deep lea ning app oaches12 ha e gained much a en ion in e o s o ecognize cance ous issue
om no mal issue, and in de eloping p e-sc eening ools o pa hologis s o indica e suspec a eas in issue13,14.
The se -back o hese app oaches so a is he di icul y o examining he ele ance and meaning o model p op-
e ies, i.e. ne wo k weigh s and ou pu laye alues used in he decision low in he con ex o he issue. In o de
o in e p e he model p ope ies used compu a ionally o a pa hologis o a esea ch biologis , meaning ul and
ecognizable ea u es o he issue a e p e e ed, especially i he in o ma ion o he issue ea u es need o be com-
bined wi h eadou s ob ained om o he measu emen modali ies. Me hods o a oid he in e p e abili y issues
in using deep lea ning a e likely o ollow, while combina ion app oaches o deep lea ning and adi ional, ea u e
based machine lea ning a e also being in es iga ed15,16.
In his s udy, we used wo popula p os a e cance mouse models17, o compa e he his ology o ea ly pa hol-
ogies o igina ing om di e en gene ic al e a ions. P en is a umo supp esso ha unc ions by inhibi ing Ak
pa hway, and i is o en dele ed in human p os a e cance 18. Mice he e ozygous o P en o m cance in many
o gans9. In he p os a e, hese mice de elop mPIN9, which is a ype o in si u lesion no epo ed o de elop o
in asi e ca cinoma wi hou addi ional gene ic o ca cinogenic manipula ion. Myc, on he o he hand, is a an-
sc ip ion ac o and a powe ul oncogene o e exp essed in many cance s, including p os a e cance 19. Hi-Myc
mice10 a e a popula model o s udy p os a e cance , as i is one o he ew gene ic mouse models o ming adeno-
ca cinoma, hus exhibi ing he cance ype mos common in human p os a e. Bo h ou models ep esen an ea ly
phase in he s ep-wise de elopmen o cance , and hus can be used in s udying he ea ly pa hological changes
in issue. We achie ed a success ul sepa a ion be ween he his ologies p o oked in hese wo models by hei
Figu e 3. Classi ica ion o mouse PIN using supe ised machine lea ning. (A) Classi ica ion con idence
gi en by he andom o es model o each P en+ /− sample o belong o he g oup o PIN using LOOCV.
(B) The sensi i i y and speci i y o he andom o es model classi ica ion shown in A p esen ed as a ROC cu e,
and he pe o mance measu ed by a ea unde he cu e (AUC). (C) Lis o 20 mos signi ican ea u es and hei
ela i e impo ances in he sepa a ion o mPIN om no mal epi helium gi en by a classi ica ion model ained
wi h all P en+ /− samples.

www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
6
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
di e en gene ic al e a ions wi h e y high speci ici y and sensi i i y. This gi es p omise o u u e aims o au o-
ma ically link gene ic and quan i a i e his ological in o ma ion o mo e a ied gene ic popula ions and umo
sub yping.
The me hod we p esen ed he e is gene ic, and he applicabili y is no limi ed o mouse issue. Tumo ma e-
ial om human pa ien s, howe e , includes highe gene ic and pheno ypic a iabili y compa ed o gene ically
es ic ed mouse model ma e ial. Thus, well anno a ed, la ge enough da ase s a e equi ed o u he de elop and
alida e au oma ed image analysis pipelines o u u e use in clinical and esea ch applica ions in human cance .
Ano he cu en challenge is o au oma e he de ec ion s ep o egions o in e es . Recen ly, machine lea ning has
been applied in au oma ed ROI de ec ion in, e.g., me as asis de ec ion om human b eas cance samples13. Ou
app oach o ROI classi ica ion could also be applied o ROI de ec ion. This equi es quan i a i e p ocessing o
no jus he in e es a eas, bu all he neighbou ing issue ypes and s uc u es as well, including he basemen
memb ane, s omal cells and ibe s, ne es, ascula u e, smoo h muscle, and adipose issue. Acqui ing quan i a-
i e ep esen a ions o hese di e en issue componen s and ypes will bene i applica ions o digi al pa hology
also beyond cance esea ch.
In addi ion o umo geno ypes, da a ep esen ing umo pheno ypes a e desi ed o combine wi h quan i a i e
ep esen a ions o his ology p o ided by me hods such as he ones p esen ed he e. Recen ad ances in spa ial
ansc ip omics20,21 in eg a ed wi h compu a ional his ological analyses will undoub edly p o ide unde s anding
o spa ial a ia ion and e olu ion o umo s. Fu he , quan i a i e ep esen a ion o issue ea u es and he e oge-
nei y along wi h h ee-dimensional econs uc ions o whole o gans om se ial sec ions, such as he p os a e22,
Figu e 4. Quan i a i e cha ac e is ics o no mal epi helium, P en he e ozygous mPIN, and Hi-Myc-
induced p eneoplasia in mouse la e al p os a e. (A) Examples o ep esen a i e his ologies o no mal and
p eneoplas ic LP epi helium om P en+ /− and Hi-Myc mouse model p os a es. Scale ba s 25 μm. (B) Dis inc
ea u e alue pa e ns o P en he e ozygous PIN, Hi-Myc-induced ea ly neoplasia, and no mal epi helium
p esen ed in a hea map a e hie a chical clus e ing o no malized ea u e alues. (C) Th ee-dimensional -SNE
isualisa ion shows dis inc i e pa e ns o he h ee his ological popula ions.
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
7
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
will enable in ui i e isuliza ion and p o ide no el insigh in o he spa ial a ia ion wi hin issue, as well as umo
g ow h pa e ns, in a na u al con ex .
Me hods
E hical pe missions. All animal expe imen a ion and ca e p ocedu es we e ca ied ou in acco dance
wi h guidelines and egula ions o he na ional Animal Expe imen Boa d o Finland, and we e app o ed
by he boa d o labo a o y animal wo k o he S a e P o incial O ices o Sou h Finland (licence numbe s
ESAVI/6271/04.10.03/2011 and ESAVI/5147/04.10.07/2015).
Tissue samples. FVB/N mice ei he he e ozygous o P en (P en+ / −
9) o ansgenic o MYC oncogene
(Hi-Myc10) we e used. P os a es we e ixed in PAXgeneTM issue ixa i e acco ding o manu ac u e ’s p o ocol,
and embedded in pa a in. 5 μm issue sec ions we e cu , a ached o glass slides, and s ained wi h hema oxylin
and eosin.
Imaging and ROI sepa a ion. HE-s ained slides we e whole slide imaged wi h Zeiss Axioskop40 mic o-
scope (Ca l Zeiss Mic oImaging, NY, USA) wi h 20x objec i e and a CCD colo came a (QICAM Fas ; QImaging,
Canada) and a mo o ized specimen s age (Mä zhäuse We zla GmbH, Ge many). The au oma ed image acqui-
si ion was con olled by he Su eyo imaging sys em (Objec i e Imaging, UK). Uncomp essed bi map ou pu
was con e ed by JVSdicom Comp esso applica ion o JPEG2000 WSI o ma 23. Snapsho images o Figu es
we e ob ained h ough JVSView i ual mic oscope (h p://j smic oscope.u a. i) and ImageJ so wa e (Na ional
Ins i u es o Heal h, Be hesda, MD, USA24). Regions o in e es we e manually ma ked using a eehand selec ion
ool in ImageJ. The esul ing bina y mask was used o ex ac ing he ROI om he ull esolu ion o iginal HE
image o u he p ocessing. In no mal issue, epi helial laye o p os a e acini was included, excluding o he is-
sue componen s in he o gan such as s oma, u e h a, essels and ne e bundles. Pa hological lesion masks each
included solely mPIN/neoplas ic epi helium. In he case o Hi-Myc samples, hese we e always wi hin a single
acinus each. In he case o P en+ /− lesions, whe e one mPIN umo could each se e al acina lumen wi hin a
ce ain sec ion, all a ec ed lumen we e included in a single mask.
P ep ocessing o images. The p ep ocessing o he images included his og am ma ching in o de o
emo e he colo a ia ion be ween samples, exclusion o unwan ed egions, colo decon olu ion o sepa a e
Figu e 5. Classi ica ion be ween no mal epi helium, P en he e ozygous mPIN, and Hi-Myc-induced
p eneoplasia in mouse la e al p os a e using supe ised machine lea ning. (A) Classi ica ion accu acies
o sepa a ing he h ee his ological popula ions gi en by he p oposed classi ica ion model as a con usion
ma ix. (B) ROC cu es ep esen ing he pe o mance o he classi ica ion model when dis inguishing P en
he e ozygous mPIN, Hi-Myc-induced ea ly neoplasia, and no mal epi helium. Each cu e p esen s he
classi ica ion accu acy o sepa a ing one g oup o he h ee om he wo o he o he g oups. Pe o mances
as measu ed by he a ea unde he cu e (AUC) a e shown. (C) Lis o 20 mos signi ican ea u es and hei
ela i e impo ances in he sepa a ion o P en he e ozygous mPIN, Hi-Myc-induced ea ly neoplasia, and
no mal epi helium by he andom o es model ained wi h all o he LP samples om P en+ /− , Hi-Myc,
and no mal epi helium. (D) Values o ou mos signi ican ea u es in C as boxplo s showing he di e ences
be ween P en he e ozygous mPIN, Hi-Myc-induced ea ly neoplasia, and no mal epi helium.
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
8
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
hema oxylin and eosin s ains, and nuclei segmen a ion. These s eps we e implemen ed o bounding box a eas
a ound each ROI.
His og am ma ching was pe o med o balance s aining a ia ion be ween sec ions. Fo a e e ence his og am,
a mean his og am was compu ed om a ep esen a i e se o samples consis ing o ROI images o p eneoplas ic
lesions and no mal p os a e epi helium om all h ee lobula a eas. A e his, his og am ma ching was pe -
o med by using a ans o m unc ion compu ed be ween he image’s his og am and he e e ence his og am.
To segmen he e ec i e issue a ea wi hin each ROI, a mask o sec e ion- illed egions and emp y a eas was
ob ained by sub ac ing di e en colo channels and pe o ming con as limi ed mapping o he in ensi y alues
simila ly as in Ruusu uo i e al.7. The inal bina y mask was ob ained by h esholding using O su’s me hod25. To
smoo hen he bina y segmen a ion mask, mo phological opening, closing, and illing we e pe o med.
A colo decon olu ion algo i hm26 was applied o con e he ed, g een, and blue channels o each image in o
hema oxylin s ain, eosin s ain, and backg ound. Hema oxylin s ains mainly he cell nuclei and he e o e, hema-
oxylin channel was u he p ocessed o segmen cell nuclei. Maximally s able ex emal egions (MSER)27 we e
ex ac ed om he g ayscale image o hema oxylin s ain. MSER is a me hod o blob de ec ion om an image. Se
o de ec ed egions we e selec ed based on he size co esponding o po en ial nuclei size. Addi ionally, egions
ha did no con ain high g ayscale in ensi y alues ela ed o high amoun o hema oxylin s ain, we e excluded.
To ge he map o high a e o hema oxylin, opha il e ing, maximum il e ing, Gaussian il e ing, and image
in ensi y adjus men was pe o med. Bina y mask o high hema oxylin a e was ob ained by h esholding using
O su’s me hod25. To ge he inal bina y mask o cell nuclei, MSER egions ha we e o e lapping wi h mask o
high a e o hema oxylin we e selec ed.
Fea u e ex ac ion. P ope ies o each ROI we e desc ibed wi h ex ac ion o 241 ea u es
(Supplemen a yTable1). These ea u es included local desc ip o s ela ed o image ex u e and dis ibu ion o
nuclei. Tex u e ea u es we e ex ac ed om local neighbo hoods ep esen ing dis inc le els o issue a chi-
ec u e and, hus, measu ed as di e en ea u es (e.g. Con as -H, NhoodCon as -H, ROI-BlockCon as -H,
ROICon as -H), and also om bo h hema oxylin and eosin channels (e.g. Con as -H, Con as -E). The neigh-
bo hoods o ex u e ea u es included bounding box o each segmen ed nucleus, 35 × 35 pixel neighbo hood
a ound each nucleus, non-o e lapping 50 × 50 pixel neighbo hoods wi hin e ec i e issue a ea wi h unwan ed
egions included and excluded (e.g. mROI-BlockCon as -H, ROI-BlockCon as -H), and he whole bounding
box image o he ROI. Nuclei dis ibu ion ea u es we e ex ac ed om a 100 × 100 pixel neighbo hood a ound
each nucleus. To ob ain a single ea u e ec o o he whole ROI a ea, mean ea u e alues we e calcula ed om
all blocks p esen ing one combina ion o ce ain ea u e and neighbo hood. De ails abou each ex ac ed ea u e
and he applied local neighbo hoods a e p esen ed in Supplemen a yTable1.
Tex u e ea u es. The ex ac ed ex u e based ea u es included, e.g., mean in ensi y alue, con as , co -
ela ion, and ene gy, calcula ed om g ay le el co-occu ence ma ix (GLCM). P ope ies o he ex u e wi hin
each ROI we e also ex ac ed using local bina y pa e ns (LBP)28,29 and scale-in a ian desc ip o s ob ained ia
he Scale-in a ian ea u e ans o m (SIFT)30. Addi ionally, p ope ies o MSER egions we e used as ea u es.
VLFea 31 implemen a ions o SIFT and MSER we e used in his wo k.
Nuclei dis ibu ion ea u es. Fea u es ela ed o dis ibu ion o cell nuclei we e calcula ed om a nuclei
loca ion map, gene a ed by ma king he cen e poin o each segmen ed nucleus. Fea u es included desc ip o s
ela ed o in e -nuclei dis ance, nuclei loca ions wi h espec o each o he desc ibed wi h angula s a is ics, num-
be o nuclei wi hin a neighbo hood, and densi y ea u es. The densi y ea u es we e calcula ed om a Gaussian
il e ed nuclei loca ion map.
The angula s a is ic ea u es we e ex ac ed using Ci cS a oolbox32. Fo each nucleus, an angle o all i s
neighbou ing nuclei wi hin a 100 × 100 pixel block was calcula ed. Supplemen a yFigu e2 p esen s an example
pola his og am o hese calcula ed angles om bo h no mal epi helium sample and p eneoplas ic lesion sample.
The ea u es ela ed o angula s a is ics included p ope ies o his pola his og am, such as, a iance, s anda d
de ia ion, skewness, and ku osis.
Fea u e selec ion. To s udy he spa ial a ia ion in epi helium wi hin di e en lobula a eas o no mal is-
sue, as well as in he compa ison o no mal issue and p eneoplas ic mPIN lesions, we used all he ex ac ed 241
ea u es. Fo he compa ison o h ee g oups (no mal, P en+ /− , and Hi-Myc), a ea u e selec ion was pe o med
by s a is ical es ing be ween ea u es ex ac ed om bo h Hi-Myc and P en+ /− no mal p os a e epi helium sam-
ples. Two-sample Kolmogo o -Smi no es 33 (signi icance h eshold α = 0.05) was used o de e mine i he ea-
u e da a ex ac ed om hese wo no mal sample g oups we e om he same con inuous dis ibu ion. Al oge he
59 ea u es no showing s a is ically signi ican di e ece be ween he wo no mal popula ions we e included in
u he analysis (Supplemen a yTable2).
Classi ica ion. The ea u e ep esen a ions o ROI samples we e used o ain a andom o es model34.
Random o es algo i hm was chosen due o i s capabili y o handle bo h high da a dimensionali y and a ying
sample sizes in a compu a ionally e icien manne . Addi ionally, he algo i hm assigns weigh s o inpu ea u es
based on hei impo ance in he classi ica ion ask, p o iding an in e p e able classi ica ion model and addi ional
insigh in he con ibu ion o ea u es. Boo s ap agg ega ion, which is a machine lea ning algo i hm ha com-
bines mul iple e sions o decision ees in o a andom o es model, was used o imp o e he s abili y and accu-
acy o he model. Each decision ee e sion is cons uc ed om a andomly sampled da ase wi h eplacemen .
The implemen ed model was an ensemble o 50 decision ees.
Lea e-one-ou c oss- alida ion was used o es ima ing he classi ica ion pe o mance o o ou andom o -
es model. Fo example, when dis inguishing mPIN om no mal epi helium, we had 426 samples in o al, and
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
9
Scien i ic RepoR s | 7:44831 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep44831
he e o e, we ained 426 andom o es models. Fo each model, one sample was le ou om he aining phase
and hen he ained model was used o p edic he p obabili y o his excluded sample o belong o he g oup
wi h ea ly neoplas ic changes.
F om he LOOCV expe imen s, a e age ea u e impo ances and co esponding s anda d de ia ions
we e compiled. When dis inguishing mPIN om no mal epi helium, hese we e calcula ed om he ea u e
weigh s gi en by each o he ained 426 models (Supplemen a yFigu e1). When dis inguishing be ween
Hi-Myc-induced ea ly neoplasia, P en he e ozygous mPIN, and no mal epi helium, he a e age ea u e impo -
ances o he 582 models we e calcula ed (Supplemen a yFigu e5).
Re e ences
1. Yu, K.-H. e al. P edic ing non-small cell lung cance p ognosis by ully au oma ed mic oscopic pa hology image ea u es. Na u e
Communica ions 7 (2016).
2. Ba ke , J., Hoogi, A., Depeu singe, A. & Rubin, D. L. Au oma ed classi ica ion o b ain umo ype in whole-slide digi al pa hology
images using local ep esen a i e iles. Medical image analysis 30, 60–71 (2016).
3. Chak a a hi, B. V., Nepal, S. & Va ambally, S. Genomic and epigenomic al e a ions in cance . The Ame ican Jou nal o Pa hology
186, 1724–1735 (2016).
4. Roychowdhu y, S. & Chinnaiyan, A. M. T ansla ing cance genomes and ansc ip omes o p ecision oncology. CA: a cance jou nal
o clinicians 66, 75–88 (2016).
5. He, L., Long, L. R., An ani, S. & Thoma, G. R. His ology image analysis o ca cinoma de ec ion and g ading. Compu e me hods and
p og ams in biomedicine 107, 538–556 (2012).
6. Ko ha i, S., Phan, J. H., S okes, T. H. & Wang, M. D. Pa hology imaging in o ma ics o quan i a i e analysis o whole-slide images.
Jou nal o he Ame ican Medical In o ma ics Associa ion 20, 1099–1108 (2013).
7. Ruusu uo i, P., Valkonen, M., Nyk e , M., Visako pi, T. & La onen, L. Fea u e-based analysis o mouse p os a ic in aepi helial
neoplasia in his ological issue sec ions. Jou nal o pa hology in o ma ics 7 (2016).
8. Diamond, J., Ande son, N. H., Ba els, P. H., Mon i oni, R. & Hamil on, P. W. The use o mo phological cha ac e is ics and ex u e
analysis in he iden i ica ion o issue composi ion in p os a ic neoplasia. Human Pa hology 35, 1121–1131 (2004).
9. Di C is o ano, A., Pesce, B., Co don-Ca do, C. & Pandol i, P. P. P en is essen ial o emb yonic de elopmen and umou supp ession.
Na u e gene ics 19, 348–355 (1998).
10. Ellwood-Yen, K. e al. Myc-d i en mu ine p os a e cance sha es molecula ea u es wi h human p os a e umo s. Cance cell 4,
223–238 (2003).
11. Maa en, L. . d. & Hin on, G. Visualizing da a using -sne. Jou nal o Machine Lea ning Resea ch 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
12. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hin on, G. Deep lea ning. Na u e 521, 436–444 (2015).
13. Wang, D., Khosla, A., Ga geya, R., I shad, H. & Beck, A. H. Deep lea ning o iden i ying me as a ic b eas cance . a Xi p ep in
a Xi :1606.05718 (2016).
14. Chen, R., Jing, Y. & Jackson, H. Iden i ying me as ases in sen inel lymph nodes wi h deep con olu ional neu al ne wo ks. a Xi
p ep in a Xi :1608.01658 (2016).
15. Wang, P., Li, Z., Hou, Y. & Li, W. Combining con ne s wi h hand-c a ed ea u es o ac ion ecogni ion based on an hmm-s m
classi ie . a Xi p ep in a Xi :1602.00749 (2016).
16. Sadanandan, S. K., Rane all, P. & Wählby, C. Fea u e augmen ed deep neu al ne wo ks o segmen a ion o cells. In Eu opean
Con e ence on Compu e Vision, 231–243 (Sp inge , 2016).
17. G abowska, M. M. e al. Mouse models o p os a e cance : picking he bes model o he ques ion. Cance and Me as asis Re iews
33, 377–397 (2014).
18. Song, M. S., Salmena, L. & Pandol i, P. P. The unc ions and egula ion o he p en umou supp esso . Na u e e iews Molecula cell
biology 13, 283–296 (2012).
19. S ine, Z. E., Wal on, Z. E., Al man, B. J., Hsieh, A. L. & Dang, C. V. Myc, me abolism, and cance . Cance disco e y 5, 1024–1039
(2015).
20. C ose o, N., Bienko, M. & an Oudenaa den, A. Spa ially esol ed ansc ip omics and beyond. Na u e Re iews Gene ics 16, 57–66
(2015).
21. S åhl, P. L. e al. Visualiza ion and analysis o gene exp ession in issue sec ions by spa ial ansc ip omics. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).
22. Ka asalo, K., La onen, L., Visako pi, T., Nyk e , M. & Ruusu uo i, P. Benchma king o algo i hms o 3d issue econs uc ion. In
Image P ocessing (ICIP), 2016 IEEE In e na ional Con e ence on, 2360–2364 (IEEE, 2016).
23. Tuominen, V. J. & Isola, J. Linking whole-slide mic oscope images wi h dicom by using jpeg2000 in e ac i e p o ocol. Jou nal o
Digi al Imaging 23, 454–462 (2010).
24. Schneide , C. A., Rasband, W. S., Elicei i, K. W. e al. Nih image o imagej: 25 yea s o image analysis. Na me hods 9, 671–675 (2012).
25. O su, N. A h eshold selec ion me hod om g ay-le el his og ams. Au oma ica 11, 23–27 (1975).
26. Rui ok, A. C., Johns on, D. A. e al. Quan i ica ion o his ochemical s aining by colo decon olu ion. Analy ical and quan i a i e
cy ology and his ology 23, 291–299 (2001).
27. Ma as, J., Chum, O., U ban, M. & Pajdla, T. Robus wide-baseline s e eo om maximally s able ex emal egions. Image and ision
compu ing 22, 761–767 (2004).
28. Ojala, T., Pie ikäinen, M. & Mäenpää, T. G ay scale and o a ion in a ian ex u e classi ica ion wi h local bina y pa e ns. In
Compu e Vision-ECCV 2000, 404–420 (Sp inge , 2000).
29. Pie ikäinen, M., Ojala, T. & Xu, Z. Ro a ion-in a ian ex u e classi ica ion using ea u e dis ibu ions. Pa e n Recogni ion 33, 43–52
(2000).
30. Lowe, D. G. Dis inc i e image ea u es om scale-in a ian keypoin s. In e na ional jou nal o compu e ision 60, 91–110 (2004).
31. Vedaldi, A. & Fulke son, B. VLFea : An open and po able lib a y o compu e ision algo i hms. h p://www. l ea .o g/ (2008).
32. Be ens, P. e al. Ci cs a : a ma lab oolbox o ci cula s a is ics. J S a So w 31, 1–21 (2009).
33. Massey, F. J. Jou nal o he Ame ican S a is ical Associa ion 46, 68–78 (1951).
34. B eiman, L. Random o es s. Machine lea ning 45, 5–32 (2001).
Acknowledgemen s
We hank Ms. Päi i Ma ikainen, Ms. Ma ja Pi inen, and M s. Ma ika Vähä-Jaakkola o skill ul echnical
labo a o y assis ance. G an suppo has been ob ained om Finnish Funding Agency o Inno a ion (p ojec
Th ee dimensional his ogenomic modeling o whole p os a e), Academy o Finland (g an no. 279270), he
Cance Socie y o Finland, he Sig id Juselius Founda ion, he Medical Resea ch Fund o Tampe e Uni e si y
Hospi al, Doc o al P og amme o Compu ing and Elec ical Enginee ing a Tampe e Uni e si y o Technology,
and Emil Aal onen Founda ion.