scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Diiron centre mutations in Ciona intestinalis alternative oxidase abolish enzymatic activity and prevent rescue of cytochrome oxidase deficiency in flies

Abstract

The mitochondrial alternative oxidase, AOX, carries out the non proton-motive re-oxidation of ubiquinol by oxygen in lower eukaryotes, plants and some animals. Here we created a modified version of AOX from Ciona instestinalis, carrying mutations at conserved residues predicted to be required for chelation of the diiron prosthetic group. The modified protein was stably expressed in mammalian cells or flies, but lacked enzymatic activity and was unable to rescue the phenotypes of flies knocked down for a subunit of cytochrome oxidase. The mutated AOX transgene is thus a potentially useful tool in studies of the physiological effects of AOX expression.

Read accessible full text

Diiron centre mutations in Ciona intestinalis alternative oxidase abolish enzymatic activity and prevent rescue of cytochrome oxidase deficiency in flies

Author: Andjelković, Ana,Oliveira, Marcos T,Guiseppe, Cannino,Yalgin, Cagri,Dhandapani, Praveen K,Dufour, Eric,Rustin, Pierre,Szibor, Marten,Jacobs, Howard T
Year: 2015
Source: https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/10024/99547/1/diiron_centre_mutations_2015.pdf
1
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s
Dii on cen e mu a ions in Ciona
in es inalis al e na i e oxidase
abolish enzyma ic ac i i y and
p e en escue o cy och ome
oxidase de iciency in lies
Ana Andjelko ić1, Ma cos T. Oli ei a1,2, Giuseppe Cannino1, Cag i Yalgin1,
P a een K. Dhandapani1,3, E ic Du ou 1, Pie e Rus in4, Ma en Szibo 1,3 & Howa d T. Jacobs1,3
The mi ochond ial al e na i e oxidase, AOX, ca ies ou he non p o on-mo i e e-oxida ion o
ubiquinol by oxygen in lowe euka yo es, plan s and some animals. He e we c ea ed a modi ied e sion
o AOX om Ciona ins es inalis, ca ying mu a ions a conse ed esidues p edic ed o be equi ed o
chela ion o he dii on p os he ic g oup. The modi ied p o ein was s ably exp essed in mammalian cells
o lies, bu lacked enzyma ic ac i i y and was unable o escue he pheno ypes o lies knocked down
o a subuni o cy och ome oxidase. The mu a ed AOX ansgene is hus a po en ially use ul ool in
s udies o he physiological e ec s o AOX exp ession.
The mi ochond ial al e na i e oxidase, AOX, ca ies ou he non p o on-mo i e e-oxida ion o ubiquinol by
molecula oxygen. Te minal elec on ans e by AOX cons i u es a pa allel sys em o ha p o ided by OXPHOS
complexes III and IV in plan s, ungi, p o is s and many animal phyla1. AOX is belie ed o become ac i a ed unde
s ess condi ions, when he OXPHOS cy och ome chain is o e loaded o una ailable.
In many o ganisms his is achie ed, a leas in pa , ia he egula ed exp ession o he AOX gene, which is
induced by a a ie y o s esses ele an o OXPHOS dys unc ion2,3. The enzyme is also inhe en ly esponsi e o
he me abolic signa u e o such s esses in di e en o ganisms. Fi s ly, i is ac i a ed by high le els o i s educed
subs a e, ubiquinol
4,5
, which is assumed o e lec a lowe a ini y o he subs a e han ha exhibi ed by OXPHOS
complex III, wi h which i compe es. Thus, unde no mal physiological condi ions, mos o he elec on low
om ubiquinol o oxygen is channelled h ough complexes III and IV, e en i AOX is physically p esen . Only i
ubiquinol le els inc ease, o example, i he enzyma ic capaci y o complexes III and IV becomes limi ing, will
AOX become unc ionally signi ican . In addi ion, AOX is allos e ically ac i a ed in many o ganisms by me abo-
li es whose le els inc ease unde condi ions o OXPHOS insu iciency, o example py u a e3, as well as by o he
me aboli es indica i e o cellula edox s a e.
Al hough he AOX gene has been los , du ing he cou se o e olu ion, in he lineages leading o he mos com-
plex and ad anced me azoan g oups, including mammals
1
, we easoned ha i s ein oduc ion by ansgenesis
should enable such animals o bu e many o he pa hological s esses esul ing om OXPHOS dys unc ion6.
Thus AOX could become a he apeu ic ool o ea ing mi ochond ial diseases and o he condi ions media ed by
OXPHOS dys unc ion7. P elimina y es s in model o ganisms, including cul u ed human cells8,9, D osophila10,11
and he mouse12, suppo his concep . In pa icula , he exp ession o AOX om he unica e Ciona in es inalis, was
shown o compensa e many o he pheno ypes esul ing om cy och ome oxidase (COX, complex IV) de iciency
in D osophila, including he knockdown o s uc u ally essen ial subuni s o he complex
11
. Howe e , i AOX is o
be o alue in e en ual he apy, he mechanism o his compensa ion needs o be es ablished. The hypo hesized
1BioMediTech and Tampe e Uni e si y Hospi al, Uni e si y o Tampe e, FI-33014, Finland. 2Depa amen o de
Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências Ag á ias e Ve e iná ias, Uni e sidade Es adual Paulis a “Júlio de Mesqui a Filho”,
14884-900 Jabo icabal, SP, B azil. 3Ins i u e o Bio echnology, Uni e si y o Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland. 4INSERM
UMR 1141 and Uni e si é Pa is 7, Facul é de Médecine Denis Dide o , Hôpi al Robe Deb é, 48, Boule a d Sé u ie ,
75019, Pa is, F ance. Co espondence and eques s o ma e ials should be add essed o H.T.J. (email: howa d.
[email p o ec ed])
Recei ed: 27 Augus 2015
Accep ed: 22 Oc obe 2015
Published: 17 Decembe 2015
OPEN
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
2
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
enzyma ic by-pass is only one o se e al possible such mechanisms. Exp ession o an ine ansgene, such as
GFP, in place o AOX, was unable o escue he pheno ypes p oduced by enginee ed de iciency o cy och ome
oxidase10,11. Howe e , his con ol canno be unambiguously in e p e ed, since he exp essed GFP was no a ge ed
o mi ochond ia, and e en i i we e, does no possess o he s uc u al ea u es o AOX ha enable i o inse in o
he inne mi ochond ial memb ane in a speci ic ashion and in e ac wi h o he componen s he eo .
In o de o p o ide a mo e applicable es o whe he he abili y o AOX o escue COX de iciency depends
on i s p ima y enzyma ic ac i i y, we sough o enginee he AOX in such a way as o des oy his ac i i y, whils
p oducing only a minimal e ec on he o e all s uc u e, s abili y and exp ession o he p o ein. To do his, we ook
ad an age o he ac ha AOX is well conse ed phylogene ically, ha he esidues con ibu ing o i s ac i e si e
ha e been cha ac e ized in a numbe o species, and ha he s uc u e o a ep esen a i e AOX, om he p o is an
pa asi e T ypanosoma b ucei, has ecen ly been published
13
. Using cu en ly a ailable bioin o ma ics ools, we
modelled he s uc u e o he Ciona in es inalis enzyme agains his empla e, p edic ed amino-acids equi ed o
binding he ca aly ically essen ial dii on moie y a he ac i e si e, and p oceeded ia alanine-subs i u ion mu agen-
esis o c ea e an exp essible e sion o he enzyme expec ed o lack enzyma ic ac i i y, despi e being p edic ed o
old o a simila o e all s uc u e. In se e al di e en con ex s (cul u ed human and D osophila cells, as well as
whole animals), we ound ha he mu a ed AOX was s ably exp essed bu de oid o de ec able enzyma ic ac i i y.
Fu he mo e, exp ession o he ansgene encoding he mu a ed AOX was unable o escue enginee ed COX de i-
ciency in he ly, con i ming ha his escue indeed depends on he enzyma ic ac i i y o AOX.
Ma e ials and Me hods
Sequence alignmen s and molecula modelling.
The sequences o AOX homologues ound by Blas P
sea ching we e aligned using he MUSCLE algo i hm buil in o he so wa e MEGA614, wi h de aul pa ame e s.
A homologous model o he s uc u e o one subuni o he C. in es inalis AOX was gene a ed using he so wa e
I-TASSER15, based on he c ys al s uc u e o he T ypanosoma b ucei AOX (PDB 3VV9:A)13 as empla e and he
mul iple sequence alignmen desc ibed abo e as inpu es ain . O he pa ame e s we e se as de aul . Selec ion
o he model was based upon he bes accu acy es ima ions p o ided by he C-sco es, es ima ed TM-sco es and
RMSD alues. Because he N- e minal egion (M1-K103) o he C. in es inalis AOX s uc u e could no be mod-
elled wi h high accu acy, his egion was elimina ed om he analysis. The dime ic model o C. in es inalis AOX
and he posi ioning o he wo dii on cen es (one pe subuni ) we e buil by o e lapping wo copies o he model
gene a ed by I-TASSER in o he c ys al s uc u e o he dime ic T. b ucei AOX using Pymol (www.pymol.o g).
Pymol was also used o analyze all s uc u e models and o p oduce he igu es.
Cloning p ocedu es and mu agenesis. Fo D osophila exp ession, he C. in es inalis AOX coding sequence,
including i s na u al s op codon, was ecloned om he pMT/V5-His B ec o (In i ogen), in which i had been
p e iously p opaga ed, in o he EcoRI si e o pUASTa B
16
. Based on he mul iple sequence alignmen shown in
Fig. S1, and he esul s o molecula modelling (see Resul s), PCR-based alanine subs i u ion mu agenesis and
ecloning we e ca ied ou acco ding o he scheme o Fig. S2. Mu a ions E239A, H242A, E344A and H347A we e
in oduced, using he plasmid-bo ne AOX cDNA as empla e, P u DNA polyme ase (S a agene) and oligonucleo-
ides (all shown 5′ o 3′ ) as ollows: GAAGCTGAAAATGcGAGAATGgcCTTAATGACTGCG and CGCAGTCA
TTAAGgcCATTCTCgCATTTTCAGCTTC o c ea e E239A/H242A, ollowed by ATCTGAGCTGAT
GcAGCACATgcCAGATCAGTCAAC and GTTGACTGATCTGgcATGTGCTgCATCAGCTCGGAT o c ea e
E344A/H347A (lowe case le e s indica e he si es o in oduced mu a ions). Fo exp ession in S2 cells, cons uc s
con aining he o iginal and mu a ed AOX cDNA inse s, again using he na u al s op codon, we e ecloned in o
he EcoRI si e o pAc5.1/V5-His B (In i ogen, USA) o c ea e pAC/AOX17 and pAC/mu AOX. Fo ansien
mammalian exp ession, he wild- ype and mu a ed AOX coding sequences we e ecloned, espec i ely, in o a
pBR322-de i ed kanR plasmid con aining he CAG p omo e 18 and bo ine g ow h ho mone poly(A) signal, oge he
wi h o he elemen s no ele an o he p esen s udy (copies o he e ope a o , loxP si es, insula o elemen s and
po ions o he po cine Gg a1 gene), o c ea e he exp ession cons uc s pCAG-AOX and pCAG-mu AOX. The
nucleo ide sequences o all clones we e con i med by Sange sequencing using he Big Dye Te mina o 3.1 ki
(Li e Technologies) and an ABI3130xl Gene ic Analyze , acco ding o he manu ac u e ’s speci ica ions.
D osophila s ocks and main enance.
Excep whe e s a ed, lies we e main ained and g own on s anda d
medium a 25°C, using a 12 h ligh /da k cycle, as p e iously10,19. Balance s, ecipien line w1118, he RNAi line o
CG9603 (Vienna D osophila RNAi Cen e line 106661), he ubiqui ous da-GAL4 d i e (Blooming on line 8641)
and he d i e line bea ing ela C155-GAL4 on ch omosome X and UAS-Dc 2 on ch omosome 2 (Blooming on line
25750), we e ob ained om s ock cen es. Φ C31 ecombinase-media ed-si e-di ec ed ansgenesis was used o
gene a e ansgenic ly lines (se ice p o ided by Bes Gene Inc, Chino Hills, CA), using ecipien lines wi h he
ollowing in eg a ion si es: a P18 (ch omosome X), a P40 (ch omosome 2) and a P2 (ch omosome 3), acco ding
o P ei e e al.
20
, employing he wild- ype and mu a ed AOX cons uc s cloned in pUASTa B and pUASTa B
i sel as emp y- ec o con ol. Following cha ac e iza ion, ansgenic lines we e main ained o e balance s app o-
p ia e o ch omosome X, 2 o 3, bea ing s anda d ma ke s (FM7, CyO, TM3Sb, espec i ely). T ansgenic lines
UAS-AOXF24 and UAS-AOXF6 we e desc ibed p e iously10.
Cell cul u e and ans ec ion.
HEK293T cells we e cul u ed as p e iously21. Pla es o 3 × 106 cells we e ans
-
ec ed wi h 24 μ g o he pCAG-AOX o pCAG-mu AOX plasmids o , as con ol, emp y ec o (pWPI, Addgene),
using 60 μ l Lipo ec amine® 2000 (In i ogen) unde manu ac u e ’s ecommended condi ions. D osophila S2 cells
we e g own and ans ec ed wi h pAc5.1/V5-His B o de i a i es as p e iously17.
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
3
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
Exp ession assays.
RNA ex ac ion and QRTPCR o measu e AOX ansc ip le els using RpL32 RNA as an
in e nal no maliza ion s anda d we e as p e iously desc ibed
10
, using RNA om 2 day-old adul male and emale
lies. P o ein ex ac ion om 2 day-old D osophila adul s and Wes e n blo s we e conduc ed essen ially as by
Fe nandez-Ayala e al.10, wi h he ollowing modi ica ions: o emales, 1% SDS was used o lysis ins ead o 1.5%
T i on X-100, lies we e p ocessed in ba ches o 30 ( emales) o 40 (males), SDS-PAGE used Any kD™ C i e ion™
TGX
™
18-well gels (Bio-Rad), P es ained P o ein Ladde (The mo-Scien i ic) and P oSie e
TM
EX Running and
T ans e Bu e s (Lonza), and memb anes we e ea ed in PBS-Tween® ins ead o TBS. P ima y an ibodies used
we e cus omized abbi an i-AOX10 (21s Cen u y Biochemicals, 1:10,000), abbi an i-α -ac ininin C-20-R (San a
C uz Bio echnology, 1:5,000) and mouse an i-ATP5A (Abcam, 1:50,000). Seconda y an ibodies we e Pe oxidase
Goa An i- abbi IgG and Ho se An i-mouse IgG (bo h om Vec o Labo a o ies, 1:10,000). Pos -nuclea ex ac s
(PN) om HEK293T cells we e p epa ed acco ding o Cannino e al.21. P o ein concen a ions we e measu ed
using he B ad o d assay.
Respi ome y. Oxygen consump ion o 5 × 106 human cells was measu ed 48 h a e ans ec ion, ollow-
ing pe meabiliza ion wi h 80 μ g/ml digi onin, in a Cla k- ype elec ode (Hansa ech Oxy he m sys em) using
espi a o y bu e A
22
a 37 °C. Complex II-d i en espi a ion was measu ed in he p esence o 10 mM ADP and
10 mM succina e. AOX-d i en (an imycin- esis an ) espi a ion was measu ed a e he u he addi ion o (60 ng/
ml) an imycin A, wi h sub ac ion o any esidual oxygen consump ion a e adding 100 μ M n-p opyl galla e.
Respi ome y on S2 cells was as desc ibed p e iously
17
and was also conduc ed on homogena es om 1–4 day-old
D osophila males. B ie ly, 25 males we e gen ly homogenized in 0.8 ml ice-cold isola ion bu e (250 mM suc ose,
5 mM T is-HCl, 2 mM EGTA, pH 7.4) and muslin- il e ed. Respi ome y was pe o med on 150 μ l aliquo s o his
homogena e, mixed wi h 500 μ l assay bu e (120 mM KCl, 5 mM KH
2
PO
4
, 3 mM HEPES-KOH, 1 mM EGTA,
1 mM MgCl2, 0.2% BSA, pH 7.2), subs a es (15 mM glyce ol-3-phospha e and 5 mM ADP) and inhibi o s as o
pe meabilized mammalian cells.
Beha iou al assays. Time o eclosion ollowing D osophila c osses was measu ed as p e iously23. Eggs om
pa en s c ossed wo days ea lie we e collec ed o e h ee consecu i e nigh s, and cul u ed a 25°C. Adul s less
han 24 h old we e collec ed and so ed on ice, a e which ba ches o 5 male lies we e placed in each emp y ial.
A e a 10 min wai ing pe iod, lies we e ipped down and hei subsequen beha iou eco ded using a DFK
21AF04 came a (The Imaging Sou ce, B emen, Ge many) and Media Reco de 2 so wa e (Noldus, Wageningen,
Ne he lands). The climbing index
11
o each ial was manually calcula ed om eco dings as he mean numbe
o lies which climbed 6 cm in 10 s in h ee ials. Climbing indices om di e en geno ypes we e compa ed by
one-way ANOVA wi h Bon e oni adjus men , using SPSS 12. The box plo was d awn wi h BoxPlo R (boxplo .
ye slab.com), wi h Tukey s yle whiske s ex ending o he da a poin ha is no mo e han 1.5 × IQR (in e qua ile
ange) om he edge o he box24.
Human subjec s. The wo k epo ed he e did no use human subjec s o any ma e ials de i ed om human
subjec s, o he han he eely a ailable cell-line HEK293T.
Resul s and Discussion
Modelling and c ea ion o mu a ed AOX ansgene.
Alignmen o he p edic ed Ciona in es inalis AOX
amino-acid sequence wi h he co esponding p o ein om o he axa, including T ypanosoma b ucei, e ealed
conse a ion o esidues implica ed in he o ganiza ion o he dii on cen e o he enzyme, as p e iously epo ed
by Shiba e al.
13
. The ou in a ian glu ama e esidues and wo his idines co espond in Ciona AOX wi h E200,
E239, E290, E344, H242 and H347 (Fig. S1), numbe ed om he i s me hionine o he pu a i e p ep o ein. In he
T ypanosoma AOX s uc u e, he conse ed his idines pa icipa e in a hyd ogen bond ne wo k ha also includes
a conse ed y osine, Y297 in Ciona AOX (Fig. S1). S uc u al modelling (Fig.1) showed ha Ciona AOX can
old o an almos iden ical s uc u e as i s T ypanosoma coun e pa , igno ing he poo ly conse ed N- e minal
egion ( esidues 1–103 o he Ciona p o ein, Fig. S1). Fou alpha-helices enclose he dii on cen e o each p o ome
o he homodime ic p o ein, wi h he conse ed glu ama e and his idine esidues simila ly jux aposed as in he
T ypanosoma p o ein (Fig.1). Based on his s uc u e, we es ed he unc ional signi icance o he conse ed
esidues a he p edic ed dii on cen e, by mu a ing ou o hem o alanine (E239A, H242A, E344A, H347A), in
app op ia e ansgenic cons uc s o exp ession in mammalian cells and D osophila (Fig. S2). The mu a ions we e
p edic ed o des oy he binding o i on o he ac i e si e, whils only minimally dis u bing he o e all s uc u e
o each subuni .
Mu a ed AOX can be s ably exp essed in mammalian cells and lies. In o de o es i s unc ionali y,
he exp ession o he mu a ed AOX cons uc (mu AOX) was i s e i ied, ollowing ansien ans ec ion in o
cul u ed human cells. Based on Wes e n blo ing (Fig.2A), he mu AOX p o ein was he same size and compa-
ably exp essed as wild- ype AOX. Nex , he mu AOX ansgene, unde he con ol o he GAL4-dependen UAS
p omo e , was in oduced in o he D osophila genome by a ge ed inse ion a single si es on each ch omosome.
Pa allel con ol lines we e c ea ed, con aining wild- ype AOX and emp y ec o , inse ed a he same si es. Following
alida ion o he inse ions by PCR and sequencing, we measu ed ansgene exp ession di ec ed by he ubiqui ous
da-GAL4 d i e , a bo h RNA and p o ein le els, using QRTPCR (Fig.2B, C) and Wes e n blo ing (Fig.2D, E).
In bo h emales (Fig.2B) and males (Fig.2C), he exp ession o wild- ype and mu AOX we e simila a he
RNA le el, bu 3–4 old less han AOX in he p e iously c ea ed ansgenic lines, enginee ed by andom P-elemen
inse ion. A he p o ein le el, mu AOX showed sligh ly lowe exp ession han wild- ype AOX in bo h sexes, and
exp ession was again less han in he p e iously c ea ed lines (Fig.2D, E).
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
4
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
When exp essed ubiqui ously using he da-GAL4 d i e , he AOX and mu AOX ansgenes p oduced only
e y small changes in de elopmen al iming, mos o hem non-signi ican compa ed wi h he co esponding
ec o -only line (Fig.3).
Mu a ed AOX lacks de ec able enzyma ic ac i i y. The unc ionali y o he exp essed AOX a i-
an s was es ed by pola og aphy. Pe meabilized HEK293T cells, ollowing ansien ans ec ion wi h wild- ype
AOX, suppo ed app oxima ely 80% o he uninhibi ed oxygen consump ion, in he p esence o an imycin.
An imycin- esis an oxygen consump ion was unde ec able in pe meabilized cells ansien ly ans ec ed wi h he
mu AOX cons uc o emp y ec o (Fig.4A). A simila esul was ob ained a e ans ec ion o D osophila S2 cells.
A e ans ec ion wi h ei he o wo di e en AOX-exp essing cons uc s, whole-cell espi a ion in he p esence
o an imycin was 70–73% o he uninhibi ed a e, bu was unde ec able in con ol cells o cells ans ec ed wi h he
mu AOX cons uc (Table S1). Finally, in homogena es om male ansgenic lies ca ying a ge ed inse ions a he
same locus (on ch omosome 2), induced o exp ess he ansgene ubiqui ously using he da-GAL4 d i e , wild- ype
AOX suppo ed 14% o he uninhibi ed subs a e oxida ion a e in he p esence o an imycin (Fig.4B), whe eas
mi ochond ia om mu AOX- o emp y ec o - ansgenic lies showed no an imycin- esis an subs a e oxida ion.
In e e y pola og aphy expe imen , exp ession o he AOX ansgene was e i ied by Wes e n blo ing as pe Fig.2.
Mu a ed AOX is unable o escue COX knockdown in lies. The ac ha he mu a ed AOX is de oid
o de ec able enzyma ic ac i i y allowed us o use he newly c ea ed ansgenic lines o es whe he he p e iously
obse ed pheno ypic escue o lies knocked down o a subuni o cy och ome oxidase (Cox7a) was due o he
enzyma ic ac i i y o AOX o some o he p ope y con e ed by he AOX p o ein, when exp essed in D osophila.
Mo eo e , he ac ha he newly c ea ed ansgenic lines exp ess AOX a only abou 30% o he le el o he lines
p e iously s udied, allowed us o es whe he pheno ypic escue was quan i a i ely dependen on AOX exp es-
sion le el. Ubiqui ous knockdown o CG9603, he b oadly exp essed isogene o Cox7a, was p e iously shown o
p oduce pupal le hali y11, which was escued by high-le el exp ession o AOX.
To es he new ansgenic lines, we i s con i med ha he RNAi line used in he expe imen was de oid o
he addi ional inse ion p e iously epo ed o con e pupal le hali y un ela ed o speci ic a ge knockdown25
(Fig. S3). We hen combined he CG9603 RNAi line wi h AOX and con ol ansgenes, plus he da-GAL4 d i e
o induce simul aneous ansgene exp ession and Cox7a knockdown. Wild- ype AOX escued he le hali y, as
p e iously (Fig.5A), whe eas mu AOX o he emp y ec o we e unable o do so, con i ming ha AOX enzyma ic
ac i i y is equi ed o he escue.
Nex , we in es iga ed he e ec s o CG9603 knockdown and i s po en ial escue by AOX, using he
neu on-speci ic d i e ela
C155
-GAL4. P e iously, i was shown ha his p oduces a locomo o de ec in newly
Figu e 1. S uc u al modelling and mu agenesis o ac i e si e o Ciona in es inalis AOX. (A) Model o
he ac i e si e o he Ciona (Ci) enzyme, g een, compa ed wi h he s uc u e o he T ypanosoma b ucei (Tb)
AOX, blue. In bo h cases, he dii on si e (i on moie ies in o ange, hyd oxyl in pink) is bu ied in a ou alpha-
helix bundle. Fo cla i y, only one p o ome is shown. (B) Conse ed esidues binding he dii on cen e show
an iden ical a angemen in he Ci model (g een) as in he Tb s uc u e (blue). (C) The esidues selec ed o
alanine-subs i u ion mu agenesis in he Ci enzyme (he e shown in blue), alongside he esul ing modelled
s uc u e.
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
5
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
Figu e 2. Exp ession o AOX ansgenes in mammalian cells and D osophila. (A) Wes e n blo o p o ein
ex ac s om HEK293T cells ans ec ed wi h wild- ype and mu a ed AOX cons uc s (w , mu ) o emp y
ec o (V), p obed o AOX and o ATP syn hase subuni α as loading con ol. (B,C) Rela i e AOX exp ession
a RNA le el, based on QRTPCR, in (B) emales and (C) males o di e en D osophila lines ansgenic o
wild- ype o mu a ed AOX, o emp y ec o , inse ed on ch omosomes X, 2 and 3, as shown, in combina ion
wi h he ubiqui ous da-GAL4 d i e . New w (wild- ype) and mu AOX lines we e hose c ea ed by si e-
speci ic in eg a ion a de ined ch omosomal si es using he Φ C31 sys em; old w AOX lines we e UAS-AOXF6
(ch omosome 2) and UAS-AOXF24 (ch omosome 3). Fo males, all alues we e signi ican ly di e en om
emp y- ec o lines; old w AOX lines we e signi ican ly di e en om new w AOX lines (p < 0.001, ANOVA
ollowed by pos -hoc Bon e oni-co ec ed es ), bu mu AOX and new w AOX lines we e no signi ican ly
di e en om each o he . S a is ical analysis o emales ga e simila esul s, al hough g ea e sample- o-sample
a ia ion o old w AOX lines yielded only p < 0.05 compa ing hem wi h new w o mu AOX lines. (D,E)
Wes e n blo o p o ein ex ac s om he same lies (amoun s as shown), p obed o AOX o , as loading con ol,
ei he ATP syn hase subuni α o α -ac inin, as indica ed.
Figu e 3. De elopmen al ime o eclosion o AOX ansgenic lies. Eclosion day (mean +SD) o emales and
males o di e en D osophila lines ansgenic o wild- ype (w ) o mu a ed (mu ) AOX, o emp y ec o ( ),
inse ed on ch omosomes X, 2 and 3, as shown, in combina ion wi h he ubiqui ous da-GAL4 d i e . *deno es
signi ican di e ence om lies o he same sex om he emp y ec o line on he same ch omosome, p < 0.05
(S uden ’s es ).

www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
6
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
eclosed lies
11
. To po en ia e he pheno ype, we included UAS-Dc 2 in he backg ound, so as o inc ease he pene-
ance o RNAi. Wi hou concomi an AOX escue, he esul ing lies showed a se e e locomo o de ec as measu ed
by hei inabili y o climb he walls o he ial, in a s anda d nega i e geo axis assay (Fig.5B). High-le el exp ession
o AOX p oduced, as be o e, a clea escue, whils lowe -le el exp ession using he newly c ea ed ansgenic lines
p oduced only a modes pheno ypic imp o emen (wild- ype AOX), o no imp o emen a all (mu AOX, Fig.5B).
S uc u al conclusions.
Al e na i e oxidases a e membe s o a supe amily o me alloenzymes, cha ac e ized
by a common ca aly ic unc ion o ac i a ion o molecula oxygen, and by common s uc u al elemen s de ining
he ca aly ic dii on cen e, including he ou -helix bundle old and a mo i comp ising wo his idine esidues,
ou ca boxyla e g oups, and a b idging ca boxyla e g oup ac oss he dii on cen e26–28. The c ys al s uc u e o
he ypanosomal enzyme indica es ha i is a homodime wi h each monome comp ising six long and ou
sho α -helices13. The subuni s in e ac wi h each o he ia α -helices 2, 3 and 4, whe eas he hyd ophobic egion
o med by α -helices 1, 2, 4 and 5 is p oposed o ancho he p o ein o he inne su ace o he mi ochond ial inne
memb ane. A se ies o conse ed a ginine esidues, capable o in e ac ing wi h phospholipid head-g oups, may
Figu e 4. Respi ome y o AOX- ans ec ed cells and lies. Oxygen consump ion (% esis an o an imycin,
as de ined in Ma e ials and Me hods) o (A) pe meabilized, ansien ly ans ec ed cells, and (B) homogena es
om male ansgenic lies induced o exp ession using da-GAL4 d i e , exp essing wild- ype (w ) o mu a ed
(mu ) AOX o emp y ec o ( ). The lies had ansgenic inse ions on ch omosome 2. *deno es signi ican
di e ence om ec o -only lies.
Figu e 5. AOX escue o Cox7a de iciency. (A) Su i al (%) om egg o eclosion o lies o he indica ed
geno ypes, all bea ing he da-GAL4 d i e and he CG-9603 knockdown (RNAi) cons uc . Lines es ed
con ained ei he no addi ional ansgene (–), ec o only ( ), wild- ype (w ) o mu a ed AOX (mu ), in each case
on ch omosome 3. (B) Boxplo o climbing index o lies o he indica ed geno ypes. All lies ca ied he ela C155
-GAL4 d i e on ch omosome X plus UAS-Dc 2 wi h o wi hou he CG9603 knockdown (RNAi) cons uc on
ch omosome 2, and he indica ed AOX ansgene on ch omosome 3 (AOX7.1 is he Φ C31- a ge ed inse ion).
Ba s indica e medians, boxes show he i s and hi d qua iles pe cen iles, whiske s a e plo ed acco ding o
he Tukey scheme (K zywinski and Al man, 2014). Signi ican di e ences based on ANOVA a e indica ed by
ho izon al lines (black, ed) deno ing p < 0.05 and 0.001, espec i ely. A single ou lie poin is indica ed by an
open ci cle.
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
7
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
assis inne memb ane ancho age13. Ou s uc u e modelling o he C. in es inalis AOX sugges s ha he same
s uc u al elemen s a e conse ed in animal AOXs, and ha he enzyme is also a homodime inse ed in o he
mi ochond ial inne memb ane.
In addi ion, he model p edic s ha he ac i e si e, and he e o e he mechanism o oxygen ac i a ion, a e also
conse ed in animal AOXs. The ou -helix bundle, which ac s as a s uc u al pla o m o he binding o he wo
i on a oms, bu ies he ac i e si e deep in a hyd ophobic en i onmen . In T. b ucei AOX, glu ama e esidues 123, 162,
213 and 266, in addi ion o a hyd oxo-b idge, a e esponsible o di ec ly coo dina ing he dii on cen e. The cen e
is u he s abilized by a edox-ac i e y osine esidue29,30, Y220, and wo his idine esidues (H165 and H269),
which a e wi hin hyd ogen-bond dis ances o E123, E169 and E213. The C. in es inalis AOX model indica es ha
he homologous esidues E200, E239, E290, E344, Y297, H242 and H347 o ganize he ac i e si e in he same way.
Func ional conclusions. In heo y, he mu agenesis o a single glu ama e esidue should be enough o des -
abilize he dii on cen e
31
. Howe e , aking ad an age o he p oximi y in he DNA sequence o he codons o
E239 and H242 and o hose o E344 and H347, we we e able o c ea e alanine subs i u ions o ou impo an
ac i e si e esidues simul aneously. Acco ding o ou model, hese mu a ions should dis up i on binding, hus
gene a ing a mu an de oid o ca aly ic ac i i y, wi hou any majo dis u bance o he o e all p o ein s uc u e.
These p edic ions a e suppo ed by he ac ha he mu an and wild- ype p o eins we e exp essed a compa able
le els in mammalian cells and in lies, bu ha no enzyma ic ac i i y could be de ec ed.
Impo an ly, he mu a ed enzyme was unable o escue he o ganismal pheno ypes a ising om enginee ed
cy och ome oxidase de iciency. In heo y, he ac ion o a o eign p o ein in a enua ing such pheno ypes could be
due o any o se e al di e en mechanisms, o which he p o ision o an enzyma ic by-pass o ubiquinol oxida ion
is only one. In p e ious wo k we ound ha Ciona AOX, when exp essed in D osophila mi ochond ia, dec eased
he ne p oduc ion o mi ochond ial ROS e en unde non-inhibi ed condi ions10,32. The mechanism o his emains
unknown, bu one possibili y is ha AOX is able o ac di ec ly o indi ec ly as an an ioxidan , e.g. by binding and
quenching quinone adicals ia some o he mechanism. S udies in a ious o ganisms ha e suppo ed he idea
ha a hyd ophobic pocke , loca ed be ween α -helices 2 and 3, binds and channels ubiquinone o he ac i e si e33,
which migh be in ol ed in such an ac i i y.
A second possibili y would be a ho me ic esponse o dis up ion o he inne mi ochond ial memb ane o
i s p o ein complexes by he o eign p o ein. The induc ion o a a ie y o de ence pa hways o p o ec cells om
inc eased ROS, dis u bed p o ein, lipid o edox homeos asis, o al e ed mi ochond ial u no e o dynamics,
migh equip he o ganism o cope wi h he addi ional bu ela ed s esses o espi a o y insu iciency. Many s ud-
ies in model o ganisms suppo his concep o ‘mi oho mesis’
34
. Whils we canno ule ou ha such e ec s a e
ma e ial in o he con ex s, ou indings do exclude hem in ega d o he de elopmen al le hali y p oduced by
global cy och ome oxidase knockdown, o he locomo o dys unc ion esul ing om i s knockdown speci ically in
neu ons11. Based on ou indings, ha mu AOX canno compensa e hese pheno ypes, we in e ha he escue o
hese e ec s o cy och ome oxidase de iciency by AOX is almos ce ainly due o i s enzyma ic ac i i y as a quinol
oxidase, hough o mally we canno exclude o he , unknown e ec s o i on binding. A equi emen o enzyma ic
ac i i y migh no be ue o e e y pheno ypic ea u e con e ed by AOX in model o ganisms. Ou indings indica e
a obus way o es his in ega d o all po en ial such pheno ypes, allowing he mechanisms by which AOX ac s
o be p obed, con olled o e i ied.
Se e al quan i a i e issues a e also add essed by ou indings. The i s is ha he ex en o pheno ypic escue
depends in some ins ances on he AOX exp ession le el, bu in o he cases, such as he escue o he de elopmen al
le hali y caused by ubiqui ous COX knockdown, is an all-o -none phenomenon. We sugges ha his e lec s a
h eshold e ec whe ein e en he h ee- old lowe exp ession le el o AOX, when in eg a ed a speci ic si es by
Φ C31-media ed ecombina ion (in compa ison wi h P elemen -media ed in eg an s c ea ed p e iously), exceeds
a h eshold alue equi ed o main ain me abolic homeos asis and comple e de elopmen . In con as , he lowe
exp ession le el o he a ge ed in eg an s ga e a clea ly weake escue o locomo o dys unc ion, when COX was
knocked down only in neu ons, oughly in p opo ion o he dec eased exp ession le el.
I may also be no ed ha he amoun o an imycin- esis ance con e ed upon espi a ion in homogena es om
he a ge ed in eg an s was s ill app oxima ely 14%, compa ed wi h app oxima ely 20% o he P elemen -media ed
in eg an s, e en hough hey a e exp essed a a much highe le el. The le el o espi a o y an imycin- esis ance in
he ly may a y be ween issues, and his 20% maximum may e lec only he p ope ies o he p edominan class
o mi ochond ia. Mos o he espi a o y capaci y in adul lies is es ed in he ligh muscles, whe e mi ochond ia
make up almos one- hi d o he o al issue mass
35
. The appa en uppe limi o how much elec on low can be
di e ed h ough AOX p obably e lec s speci ic ea u es o his issue and i s ene ge ic needs. The limi could be
dic a ed by he cons ain s o memb ane a chi ec u e, o example, i much o he ubiquinone pool is channelled
di ec ly om complex I o complex III ia espi a o y supe complexes, such ha i equilib a es only slowly wi h
ee ubiquinones a ailable o AOX36. Mos o he espi a o y ac i i y in adul D osophila indeed esides in supe -
complexes37. Such a phenomenon may accoun o he in e ed h eshold e ec on he escue o de elopmen al
le hali y. Con e sely, he o ganiza ion o he espi a o y chain may di e in o he issues, such as in neu ons, whe e
a mo e g aded esponse o he AOX exp ession le el is e iden .
In conclusion, mu AOX o e s a use ul ool o u u e s udies o he mechanism(s) whe eby exp ession o
Ciona AOX modi ies he pheno ypes o model o ganisms, po en ially con ibu ing he e en ual de elopmen o
AOX-based he apies.
Re e ences
1.
McDonald, A. E., Vanle be ghe, G. C. & S aples, J. F. Al e na i e oxidase in animals: unique cha ac e is ics and axonomic dis ibu ion.
J. Exp. Biol. 212, 2627–2634 (2009).
2.
Feng, H. e al. Exp ession and signal egula ion o he al e na i e oxidase genes unde abio ic s esses. Ac a. Biochim. Biophys. Sin.
45, 985–994 (2013).
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
8
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
3.
Vanle be ghe, G. C. Al e na i e oxidase: a mi ochond ial espi a o y pa hway o main ain me abolic and signaling homeos asis
du ing abio ic and bio ic s ess in plan s. In . J. Mol. Sci. 14, 6805–6847 (2013).
4.
Hoe nagel, M. H. & Wiskich, J. T. Ac i a ion o he plan al e na i e oxidase by high educ ion le els o he Q-pool and py u a e.
A ch. Biochem. Biophys. 355, 262–270 (1998).
5.
Cas o-Gue e o, N. A., K ab, K. & Mo eno-Sánchez, R. The al e na i e espi a o y pa hway o euglena mi ochond ia. J Bioene g.
Biomemb . 36, 459–469 (2004).
6.
Rus in, P. & Jacobs, H. T. Respi a o y chain al e na i e enzymes as ools o be e unde s and and coun e ac espi a o y chain
de iciencies in human cells and animals. Physiol. Plan 137, 362–370 (2009).
7.
El-Khou y, R. e al. Enginee ing he al e na i e oxidase gene o be e unde s and and coun e ac mi ochond ial de ec s: s a e o he
a and pe spec i es. B . J. Pha macol. 171, 2243–2249 (2014).
8.
Hakkaa , A., Dassa, E. P., Jacobs, H. T. & Rus in, P. Allo opic exp ession o a mi ochond ial al e na i e oxidase con e s cyanide
esis ance o human cell espi a ion. EMBO Rep. 7, 341–345 (2006).
9.
Dassa, E. P. e al. Exp ession o he al e na i e oxidase complemen s cy och ome c oxidase de iciency in human cells. EMBO Mol.
Med. 1, 30–36 (2009).
10.
Fe nandez-Ayala, D. J. e al. Exp ession o he Ciona in es inalis al e na i e oxidase (AOX) in D osophila complemen s de ec s in
mi ochond ial oxida i e phospho yla ion. Cell Me ab. 9, 449–460 (2009).
11.
Kemppainen, K. K. e al. Exp ession o al e na i e oxidase in D osophila amelio a es di e se pheno ypes due o cy och ome oxidase
de iciency. Hum. Mol. Gene . 23, 2078–2093 (2014).
12.
El-Khou y, R. e al. Al e na i e oxidase exp ession in he mouse enables bypassing cy och ome c oxidase blockade and limi s
mi ochond ial ROS o e p oduc ion. PLoS Gene . 9, e1003182 (2013).
13.
Shiba, T. e al. S uc u e o he ypanosome cyanide-insensi i e al e na i e oxidase. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4580–4585 (2013).
14. Tamu a, K., S eche , G., Pe e son, D., Filipski, A. & Kuma , S. MEGA6: Molecula E olu iona y Gene ics Analysis e sion 6.0. Mol.
Biol. E ol. 30, 2725–2729 (2013).
15.
Bazzoli, A., Te amanzi, A. G. & Zhang, Y. Compu a ional p o ein design and la ge-scale assessmen by I-TASSER s uc u e assembly
simula ions. J Mol. Biol. 407, 764–776 (2011).
16.
Bischo , J., Maeda, R. K., Hedige , M., Ka ch, F. & Besle , K. An op imized ansgenesis sys em o D osophila using ge m-line-speci ic
ϕ C31 in eg ases. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3312–3317 (2007).
17. Fukuoh, A. e al. Sc een o mi ochond ial DNA copy numbe main enance genes e eals essen ial ole o ATP syn hase. Mol. Sys .
Biol. 10, 734 (2014).
18.
Niwa, H., Yamamu a, K. & Miyazaki, J. E icien selec ion o high-exp ession ans ec an s wi h a no el euka yo ic ec o . Gene 108,
193–199 (1991).
19.
Sanz, A. e al. Exp ession o he yeas NADH dehyd ogenase Ndi1 in D osophila con e s inc eased li espan independen ly o die a y
es ic ion. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9105–9110 (2010).
20. P ei e , B. D. e al. Re inemen o ools o a ge ed gene exp ession in D osophila. Gene ics 186, 735–755 (2010).
21.
Cannino, G. e al. Glucose modula es espi a o y complex I ac i i y in esponse o acu e mi ochond ial dys unc ion. J Biol. Chem.
287, 38729–38740 (2012).
22. Ch e ien, D. e al. Re e ence cha s o espi a o y chain ac i i ies in human issues. Clin. Chim. Ac a. 228, 53–70 (1994).
23. Toi onen, J. M. e al. echnical knockou , a D osophila model o mi ochond ial dea ness. Gene ics 159, 241–254 (2001).
24. K zywinski, M. & Al man, N. Poin s o Signi icance: Visualizing samples wi h box plo s. Na u e Me hods 11, 119–120 (2014).
25. G een, E. W., Fedele, G., Gio gini, F. & Ky iacou, C. P. A D osophila RNAi collec ion is subjec o dominan pheno ypic e ec s. Na .
Me hods 11, 222–223 (2014).
26.
Be hold, D. A., Voe odskaya, N., S enma k, P., G äslund, A. & No dlund, P. EPR s udies o he mi ochond ial al e na i e oxidase.
E idence o a dii on ca boxyla e cen e . J Biol. Chem. 277, 43608–43614 (2002).
27. Be hold, D. A. & S enma k, P. Memb ane-bound di-i on ca boxyla e p o eins. Annu. Re . Plan Biol. 54, 497–517 (2003).
28.
Simone, F., Reisne , E. & Lippa d, S. J. Cu en challenges o modeling dii on enzyme ac i e si es o dioxygen ac i a ion by biomime ic
syn he ic complexes. Chem. Soc. Re . 39, 2768–2779 (2010).
29.
Albu y, M. S., A ou i , C., C ich on, P. G. & Moo e, A. L. S uc u e o he plan al e na i e oxidase. Si e-di ec ed mu agenesis p o ides
new in o ma ion on he ac i e si e and memb ane opology. J Biol. Chem. 277, 1190–1194 (2002).
30.
A ou i , C., Albu y, M. S., C ich on, P. G. & Moo e, A. L. Explo ing he molecula na u e o al e na i e oxidase egula ion and
ca alysis. FEBS Le . 510, 121–126 (2002).
31. Ajayi, W. U., Chaudhu i, M. & Hill, G. C. Si e-di ec ed mu agenesis e eals he essen iali y o he conse ed esidues in he pu a i e
dii on ac i e si e o he ypanosome al e na i e oxidase. J Biol. Chem. 277, 8187–8193 (2002).
32.
Sanz, A., Fe nández-Ayala, D. J., S e ana os, R. K. & Jacobs, H. T. Mi ochond ial ROS p oduc ion co ela es wi h, bu does no di ec ly
egula e li espan in D osophila. Aging 2, 200–223 (2010).
33.
Albu y, M. S., Ellio , C. & Moo e, A. L. Towa ds a s uc u al elucida ion o he al e na i e oxidase in plan s. Physiol. Plan 137,
316–327 (2009).
34. Yun, J. & Finkel, T. Mi oho mesis. Cell Me ab. 19, 757–766 (2014).
35.
Le enbook, L. & Williams, C. M. Mi ochond ia in he ligh muscles o insec s III. Mi ochond ial cy och ome c in ela ion o he
aging and wing bea equency o lies. J. Gen. Physiol. 39, 497–512 (1956).
36.
Geno a, M. L. & Lenaz, G. Func ional ole o mi ochond ial espi a o y supe complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Ac a. 1837, 427–443
(2014).
37.
Celo o, A. M., Chiu, W. K., Van Voo hies, W. & Palladino, M. J. Modes o me abolic compensa ion du ing mi ochond ial disease
using he D osophila model o ATP6 dys unc ion. PLoS One 6, e25823 (2011).
Acknowledgemen s
We hank Tony Moo e o use ul discussions, Filippo Scialo o he cons uc ion o he o iginal AOX plasmid o
exp ession in S2 cells, Dmi o Gospoda yo o c i ical eading o he manusc ip and Samuli Ha ikainen, E eliina
Kaulio, Tea Tuomela, Essi Ki i an a, Ou i Ku onen, Me ja Jokela and Maa i Myöhänen o echnical assis ance.
Funding was p o ided by Academy o Finland (CoE g an 272376), he Eu opean Resea ch Council (ad anced g an
232738 o HTJ), he EU (Ma ie Cu ie In e na ional Incoming Fellowship 328988 o MTO), Tampe e Uni e si y
Hospi al Medical Resea ch Fund, and he Sig id Juselius Founda ion.
Au ho Con ibu ions
A.A., M.T.O., H.T.J. and P.R. concei ed and planned he p ojec . A.A., M.T.O., G.C., C.Y. and P.K.D. conduc ed
he labo a o y wo k and analysis. H.T.J., M.S. and E.D. supe ised he labo a o y wo k and con ibu ed analysis
and insigh s. H.T.J. and M.T.O. compiled he igu es and d a ed he manusc ip .
Addi ional In o ma ion
Supplemen a y in o ma ion accompanies his pape a h p://www.na u e.com/s ep
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
9
Scien i ic RepoR s | 5:18295 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep18295
Compe ing inancial in e es s: The au ho s decla e no compe ing inancial in e es s.
How o ci e his a icle: Andjelko ić, A. e al. Dii on cen e mu a ions in Ciona in es inalis al e na i e oxidase
abolish enzyma ic ac i i y and p e en escue o cy och ome oxidase de iciency in lies. Sci. Rep. 5, 18295; doi:
10.1038/s ep18295 (2015).
This wo k is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License. The images
o o he hi d pa y ma e ial in his a icle a e included in he a icle’s C ea i e Commons license,
unless indica ed o he wise in he c edi line; i he ma e ial is no included unde he C ea i e Commons license,
use s will need o ob ain pe mission om he license holde o ep oduce he ma e ial. To iew a copy o his
license, isi h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/