scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Reproducibility of 3 mm-Slice-Thick Reconstruction of Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomography Scans

Abstract

Background: After the failure of medical treatment, the surgery of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is planned according to endoscopic and paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) findings. Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether this study method might be eligible in studies aiming at radiation dose reduction. Sinus CT scans were chosen as a model because of the high variation of the radiological anatomy of surgically important sinonasal structures. We hypothesized that 3 mm-slice-thick reconstruction CT had poor reproducibility. Methods: 59 CRS patients underwent routine multi-detector sinus CT (CTMD). CT3mm was reconstructed from CTMD data-sets. Lund-Mackay (LM) scores and 43 other structural parameters were analyzed blinded. Agreement was studied between CTMD and CT3mm (intra-observer reproducibility), and between three observers (inter-observer reproducibility) by using Cohen’s kappa. Results: The inter-observer agreement was moderate (kappa 0.4 - 0.6, p < 0.01) in the majority of structures of CT3mm scans. The intra-observer reproducibility of CT3mm scans was very good in most structures, however, it was poor in important structures such as frontal and spheno-ethmoid recess, lamina pa-pyracae, and location of optic nerve or anterior ethmoidal artery. The grade of surgeon’s confidence of CT3mm in comparison to CTMD was lower (kappa 0.2 - 0.4, P < 0.05). Conclusion: This methodology might have some use in studies aiming at radiation dose reduction. As was expected, 3 mm-slice-thick reconstruction CT had poor reproducibility and surgeon’s confidence. More recent methods such as cone beam computed tomography scans have nowadays more relevant dose reduction potential

Read accessible full text

Reproducibility of 3 mm-Slice-Thick Reconstruction of Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomography Scans

Author: Karjalainen, Matti,Julkunen, Anna,Markkola, Antti,Dastidar, Prasun,Huhtala, Heini,Suvinen, Mikko,Kuukka, Anna-Maija,Rautiainen, Markus,Numminen, Jura,Toppila-Salmi, Sanna
Year: 2016
Source: https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/10024/98868/1/reproducibility_of_3_mm-slice_2016.pdf
Open Jou nal o Radiology, 2016, 6, 39-48
Published Online Ma ch 2016 in SciRes. h p://www.sci p.o g/jou nal/oj ad
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.4236/oj ad.2016.61006
How o ci e his pape : Ka jalainen, M., e al. (2016) Rep oducibili y o 3 mm-Slice-Thick Recons uc ion o Pa anasal Sinus
Compu ed Tomog aphy Scans. Open Jou nal o Radiology, 6, 39-48. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.4236/oj ad.2016.61006
Rep oducibili y o 3 mm-Slice-Thick
Recons uc ion o Pa anasal
Sinus Compu ed Tomog aphy Scans
Ma i Ka jalainen1*, Anna Julkunen2,3*, An i Ma kkola4, P asun Das ida 5, Heini Huh ala6,
Mikko Su inen1,7, Anna-Maija Kuukka1, Ma kus Rau iainen1,8, Ju a Numminen1#,
Sanna Toppila-Salmi2,9#
1Depa men o O o hinola yngology, Uni e si y o Tampe e, Tampe e, Finland
2T ansplan a ion Labo a o y, Haa man Ins i u e, Uni e si y o Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
3Depa men o O al and Maxillo acial Diseases, Uni e si y o Helsinki and Helsinki Uni e si y Hospi al, Helsinki,
Finland
4Uni e si y o Helsinki and HUS Imaging, Helsinki, Finland
5Medical Imaging Cen e, Depa men o Radiology, Tampe e Uni e si y Hospi al, Finland
6School o Public Heal h, Uni e si y o Tampe e, Tampe e, Finland
7Depa men o O o hinola yngology, Tampe e Ci y Hospi al, Tampe e, Finland
8Depa men o Ea and O al diseases, Tampe e Uni e si y Hospi al, Tampe e, Finland
9Depa men o Alle gy, Uni e si y o Helsinki and Helsinki Uni e si y Hospi al, Helsinki, Finland
Recei ed 19 Janua y 2016; accep ed 23 Ma ch 2016; published 28 Ma ch 2016
Copy igh © 2016 by au ho s and Scien i ic Resea ch Publishing Inc.
This wo k is licensed unde he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion In e na ional License (CC BY).
h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
Abs ac
Backg ound: A e he ailu e o medical ea men , he su ge y o ch onic hinosinusi is (CRS) is
planned acco ding o endoscopic and pa anasal sinus compu ed omog aphy (CT) indings. Objec-
i e: The aim o his p ospec i e s udy was o e alua e whe he his s udy me hod migh be eligi-
ble in s udies aiming a adia ion dose educ ion. Sinus CT scans we e chosen as a model because
o he high a ia ion o he adiological ana omy o su gically impo an sinonasal s uc u es. We
hypo hesized ha 3 mm-slice- hick econs uc ion CT had poo ep oducibili y. Me hods: 59 CRS
pa ien s unde wen ou ine mul i-de ec o sinus CT (CTMD). CT3mm was econs uc ed om CTMD
da a-se s. Lund-Mackay (LM) sco es and 43 o he s uc u al pa ame e s we e analyzed blinded.
Ag eemen was s udied be ween CTMD and CT3mm (in a-obse e ep oducibili y), and be ween
h ee obse e s (in e -obse e ep oducibili y) by using Cohen’s kappa. Resul s: The in e -ob-
se e ag eemen was mode a e (kappa 0.4 - 0.6, p < 0.01) in he majo i y o s uc u es o CT3mm
scans. The in a-obse e ep oducibili y o CT3mm scans was e y good in mos s uc u es, how-
e e , i was poo in impo an s uc u es such as on al and spheno-e hmoid ecess, lamina pa-
*Ma i Ka jalainen and Anna Julkunen ha e equally con ibu ed o his wo k.
#
Ju a Numminen and Sanna Toppila-Salmi a e sha ed las au ho s.
M. Ka jalainen e al.
40
py acae, and loca ion o op ic ne e o an e io e hmoidal a e y. The g ade o su geon’s con i-
dence o CT3mm in compa ison o CTMD was lowe (kappa 0.2 - 0.4, P < 0.05). Conclusion: This me-
hodology migh ha e some use in s udies aiming a adia ion dose educ ion. As was expec ed, 3
mm-slice- hick econs uc ion CT had poo ep oducibili y and su geon’s con idence. Mo e ecen
me hods such as cone beam compu ed omog aphy scans ha e nowadays mo e ele an dose e-
duc ion po en ial.
Keywo ds
Ch onic Rhinosinusi is, Compu ed Tomog aphy, Image Recons uc ion, In e -Obse e Ag eemen ,
In a-Obse e Ag eemen , Kappa, Radia ion-Dose Reduc ion, Rep oducibili y, Pa anasal Sinus,
Sinus Imaging
1. In oduc ion
Ch onic hinosinusi is (CRS) is a common, mul i ac o ial and a iable disease wi h a p e alence o a ound 10%
- 16% [1]. The diagnos ics o CRS is based on ypical symp oms and clinical indings [1]. Compu ed omog a-
phy (CT) scans a e he imaging modali y o choice con i ming he ex en o pa hology and he need o su ge y.
The main indings in CRS a e mucosal changes wi hin he os eomea al complex and/o sinuses. O he cha ac e-
is ic indings a e ai - luid le els, mucosal hickening and opaci ica ion o he no mally ae a ed sinus lumen.
The only CRS indica ing change can be scle o ic, hickened bone o he sinus wall [1]. The numbe o ana omi-
cal a ian s is e y high in pa anasal sinuses [2] [3]. Se e al o hem a e loca ed close o sinonasal su gical a ea
and hus he in aope a i e lesions o hem may lead o se e e illness o be li e h ea ening. The ope a i ely im-
po an s uc u es a e inse ion o middle u bina e and he uncina ed p ocess, he loca ion o an e io e hmoidal
a e y, and Ke os class, In ao bi al cells, posi ion o he Agge nasi cell, and he ana omical a ian s loca ed in
he ope a i e a ea [4]-[6]. S udies demons a e ha he e is dose- educ ion po en ial o CT scans [7]-[10].
The aim o his p ospec i e s udy was o e alua e whe he ou me hod migh be eligible in s udies aiming a
adia ion dose educ ion. Sinus CT scans we e chosen as a model because o he high a ia ion o he adiologi-
cal ana omy o su gically impo an sinonasal s uc u es. We hypo hesized ha 3 mm-slice- hick econs uc ion
o sinus CT scans had poo dose- educ ion po en ial and in e -obse e ag eemen .
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
2.1. Pa ien s
This p ospec i e coho s udy was ca ied ou in he Depa men o O o hinola yngology a Tampe e Uni e si y
Hospi al, Finland om 2006 o 2015. The s udy was app o ed by he e hical commi ee o he Pi kanmaa Hos-
pi al Dis ic (no 96032). W i en in o med consen was ob ained o each pa icipan . A andom sample o
59CRS pa ien s, who we e e alua ed o bene i om sinus CT scans du ing 2006-2007, was en olled o his
s udy. Pa ien da a was collec ed om medical eco ds and by a ques ionnai e a he ime he sinus CT was pe -
o med. The ollow-up da a o sinonasal ope a ions and ime o su ge y was collec ed o m pa ien eco ds o
Tampe e Uni e si y Hospi al o Tampe e Ci y Hospi al in 2015 in a e age 9 yea s a e he ime o pe o ming
sinus CT scans. None o he subjec s had used Aspi in desensi iza ion, alle gen immuno he apy, o an i IgE
he apy p io o o du ing he sinus CT scans o du ing he ollow-up.
2.2. CT Scans
The pa ien s unde wen ou ine sinus mul iple de ec o compu ed omog aphy (CTMD) examina ions o clinical
pu poses. Two di e en CTMD machines we e used: GE Ligh Speed 16 (GE Heal hca e, Milwaukee, Wisconsin)
and Philips B illiance 64 (Philips, Bes , he Ne he lands). The pa ien s we e imaged in supine posi ion wi h a
kilo ol age o 120 kV and a milliampe e second o 100 mAs. In he GE machine, he slice hickness was 0.625
mm wi h co onal econs uc ions a 1.5 mm. In he Philips machine, he slice hickness was 0.9 mm wi h co onal
econs uc ions a 0.9 mm. Bo h we e h ee dimensional (3D) in na u e wi hou any gap. In all cases, he imag-
M. Ka jalainen e al.
41
ing was pe o med using a bone il e echnique. The imaging co e ed he en i e sinonasal a ea bo h in he axial
and co onal di ec ions. The co onal e o ma ions spanned h ough he en i e a ea, s a ing om he an e io wall
o he on al sinuses and ending o he le el o he pos e io wall o he sphenoid sinuses. We pe o med 3
mm-slice- hick econs uc ions (CT3mm) om co onal, sagi al and axial da a se s o CTMD. The co onal e o ma-
ions in he CTMD and CT3mm spanned h ough he en i e a ea, s a ing om he an e io wall o he on al si-
nuses and ending a he le el o he pos e io wall o he sphenoid sinuses.
2.3. E alua ion o CT Scans
CTMD and CT3mm scans we e obse ed by h ee independen obse e s blinded o each o he and o he pa ien
his o y da a. The obse a ion o he same pa ien ’s scans occu ed a leas one week apa . The ocus was o
compa e ag eemen be ween CTMD and CT3mm scans and be ween h ee obse e s in e alua ing CRS- ela ed
changes and adiological ana omy o he s uc u es. The obse e s we e an expe ienced head and neck adiolo-
gis (AM), an expe ienced ENT- and hinosu geon (JN), and a i h yea ENT esiden (ST-S). They illed in a
49 -i em o m o sinonasal s uc u es om bo h scans and om bo h sides o each pa ien (Table 3). Simila
o ms we e illed om CTMD and CT3mm scans. E alua ion o he same pa ien ’s scans occu ed a leas 7 days
apa . All asked s uc u es had 2 - 5 di e en choices. Be o e s a ing he e alua ion o he CT scans, all choices
we e ca e ully discussed by he obse e s. Obse e s also made a pilo o 15 CT scans in o de o make su e ha
all obse e s unde s ood how o ill in he o ms. The Radiologis did no espond o he ques ions: “Need o
sep oplas y” and “G ade o su geon’s con idence based on images”.
2.4. Da a Analysis
S a is ical analysis was ca ied ou by he SPSS Base 15.0 S a is ical So wa e Package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL,
USA). Cohen’s kappa was used o compa e he deg ee o ag eemen o CTMD and CT3mm scans (e.g. in aob-
se e ag eemen ); and he in e -obse e ag eemen o CT3mm scans. The calcula ion is based on he di e ence
be ween how much ag eemen is ac ually p esen compa ed o how much ag eemen would be expec ed o be
p esen by chance alone. The es ablished in e p e a ion o Kappa- alue is classi ied in o 6 subg oups: Poo ≤ 0.2,
Fai 0.21 - 0.4, Mode a e 0.41 - 0.6, Good 0.61 - 0.8, and Ve y Good 0.81 - 1.0. A alue unde ze o means ha
he ag eemen is wo se han by chance, and he alue ange is om −1 o +1. Two- ailed P- alues o <0.05 we e
conside ed s a is ically signi ican .
3. Resul s
3.1. Pa ien Cha ac e is ics
The cha ac e is ics o pa ien s a e shown in Table 1. The mean (min-max) age was 43 (13 - 77) yea s by he
ime o aking he CT scans. 54.2% o pa ien s unde wen sinonasal ope a ion wi hin a yea a e he CT scans
we e pe o med (Table 1). O hese pa ien s ha we e ope a ed a he ime o CT scans, 7 (21.9%) unde wen
e ision sinonasal su ge y in a e age 3 yea s la e . 47.5% o pa ien s epo ed su e ing om diseases (o he
han CRS) wi h egula need o medica ions. The mos equen diseases we e (numbe o pa ien s): hea and
ascula diseases [11], hypo hy eosis [8], mig aine [3] and a h osis/a h i is [4].
3.2. In e -Obse e Ag eemen o CT3mm Scans
Lund-MacKay sco es (Table 2) and 43 o he s uc u es we e e alua ed by a adiologis , an ENT su geon and an
ENT esiden om bo h CTMD and econs uc ed CT3mm scans (Table 2, Table 3). The in e -obse e ag eemen
o CT3mm scans was mode a e (kappa 0.4 - 0.6) in he majo i y o s uc u es (Table 3). In CT3mm scans, he su -
gically impo an s uc u es wi h g ea es disag eemen we e ound in Ke os classi ica ion ( adiologis s. ENT
esiden ), he loca ion o an e io e hmoidal a e y and op ic ne e (all obse e s), p ominen e hmoid bulla
(ENT esiden s. ENT su geon), and hickness and con ac o middle u bina e o o bi al lamina o e hmoidal
bone ( adiologis s. ENT su geon) (Figu e 1, Table 3).
3.3. In a-Obse e Ag eemen
We compa ed he deg ee o ag eemen be ween CTMD and CT3mm scans o he Lund-MacKay sco es and 43 o h-
M. Ka jalainen e al.
42
Table 1. Cha ac e is ics o he pa ien s.
Ch onic hinosinusi is pa ien s
n (59)
%
Gende
Male
27
45.8
Female
32 54.2
Age ≥45 yea s 35 59.3
<45 yea s 24 40.7
Smoking
No
30
50.8
Ex 11 18.6
Cu en 15 25.4
Unknown 3 5.1
Alle gic hini is
No
34
57.6
Yes 23 39.0
Unknown 2 3.4
As hma
No 45 76.3
Yes 12 20.3
Unknown 2 3.4
Nasal polyps
No 42 71.2
Yes 15 25.4
Unknown 2 3.4
Du a ion o symp oms
<1 yea 8 13.6
1 - 4.9 yea s 23 39.0
5 - 14.9 yea s 14 23.7
≥15 yea s 11 18.6
Unknown 3 5.1
An ibio ic cou ses du ing he pas 2 yea s
No 11 18.6
1 - 3 22 37.3
4 - 9 14 23.7
≥10 10 16.9
Unknown 2 3.4
Cu en use o in anasal co icos e oids
No 15 25.4
Yes 42 71.2
Unknown 2 3.4
≥1 pe o al co icos e oid cou se(s) du ing he pas 1 yea
No 55 98.2
Yes 1 1.8
Unknown 3 5.1
P e ious sinonasal ope a ion(s) No 45 76.3
Yes 14 23.7
Radiological signs in CT3mm scans o p e ious sinus ope a ion
No
46
78.0
Yes
13
22.0
Sinonasal ope a ion pe o med wi hin a yea a e he CT scans
No
25
42.4
Yes
32
54.2
Unknown
2
3.4
≥1 sinonasal ope a ion(s) du ing he 9-yea ollow-up
No
47
79.7
Yes
10
16.9
Unknown
2
3.4
Cu en symp oms by VAS, mean (min - max)
Sense o smell
3.2
(0 - 10)
Pos -nasal d ip
5.0
(0 - 10)
Obs uc ion
5.5
(0 - 10)
Facial pain
4.9
(0 - 10)
Abb e ia ion: VAS = isual analogue scale (0 - 10).
M. Ka jalainen e al.
43
Table 2. Medians and in e qua ile anges (Q1 - Q3) o he adiologic Lund McKay (LM) sco es e alua ed by he adiologis
om mul i-de ec o sinus compu ed omog aphy scans (CTMD) om 59 pa ien s su e ing om ch onic hinosinusi is.
LM sco e Righ Le
Median Q1 - Q3 Median Q1 - Q3
F on al sinus 0 0 - 1 0 0 - 1
An e io e hmoidal sinus 1 0 - 1 0 0 - 1
Os iomea al uni 0 0 - 2 0 0 - 2
Pos e io e hmoidal sinus 1 0 - 1 0 0 - 1
Sphenoid sinus 0 0 - 1 0 0 - 1
Maxilla y sinus 0 0 - 1 1 1 -1
LM sco e o al 3 1 - 6 4 1 - 5
Figu e 1. Two cases su e ing om ch onic hinosinusi is and who unde wen ou inely mul i-de ec o sinus compu ed o-
mog aphy scans (CTMD) ((A) (C) (E)). CTs wi h 3 mm slice hickness (CT3mm) we e econs uc ed om CTMD da a-se s in
o de o e alua e adia ion dose educ ion po en ial ((B) (D) (F)). (A) Pa ien 1, CTMD, F on al ecess and os ium. (B) Pa ien
1, CT3mm, ep esen a i e slice om F on al ecess and os ium wi h sligh ly limi ed isualiza ion. (C) Pa ien 1, CTMD, Os i-
omea al complex (D) Pa ien 1, CT3mm, ep esen a i e slice om Os iomea al complex wi h sligh ly limi ed isualiza ion. (E)
Pa ien 2, CTMD, An e io E hmoidal a e y sulcus (F) Pa ien 2, CT3mm, ep esen a i e An e io E hmoidal a e y sulcus, wi h
s ongly limi ed isualiza ion.
e s uc u es e alua ed by he adiologis . In gene al, he in a-obse e ag eemen was e y good (kappa 0.8 -
1.0) in he majo i y o s uc u es, such as Lund Mackay sco es (Table 4). Ye , se e al su gically impo an
s uc u es did no show adequa e ag eemen : OMC-a ea, on al and spheno-e hmoid ecess, lamina papy acae,
and op ic ne e (Table 4). An e io e hmoidal a e y was esponded o be unde ec able in 95% o he CT3mm
scans, bu only in 13% o he CTMD scans (Figu e 1).

M. Ka jalainen e al.
44
M. Ka jalainen e al.
45
M. Ka jalainen e al.
46
M. Ka jalainen e al.
47
3.4. Ope a i e Con idence o CT3mm Scans
ENT su geon and ENT esiden es ima ed ope a i e ce ain y o CT3mm in compa ison o CTMD. ENT su geon
esponded ha he ope a i e con idence is good in 69.6% o CTMD scans, and 64.3% o CT3mm scans. The in a-
obse e ag eemen in he g ade o ENT su geon’s con idence o CT3mm in compa ison o CTMD was mode a e
(kappa 0.4, P = 0.005). ENT esiden esponded ha he ope a i e con idence is good in 73.2% o CTMD scans,
bu only in 37.5% o CT3mm scans. The in a-obse e ag eemen in he g ade o ENT esiden ’s con idence o
CT3mm in compa ison o CTMD was hus poo (kappa 0.2, P = 0.035).
4. Discussion
This s udy was ca ied ou o e alua e whe he he used me hod would be eligible when s udying adia ion dose
educ ion po en ial. As an example, we compa ed wo echniques o pa anasal sinus CT scans. F om he CT
scans we e alua ed impo an s uc u es o CRS diagnos ics and ope a ion. By e o ma ing he CT3mm images,
we we e able o e alua e he same pa ien exac ly wi hou addi ional imagining. Pa ien selec ion was pe o med
andomly om a doc o ’s ecep ion. A he e ogeneous pa ien g oup made he ex apola ion o he esul s possi-
ble o clinical p ac ice
We ound ha in e -obse e ag eemen was only mode a e in CT3mm scans. This inding is in line wi h ou
unpublished da a ha in e -obse e ag eemen is a simila le el also in he con en ional CTMD scans. This
migh be due o he ac ha sinonasal ana omy is highly a iable. In a-obse e ag eemen be ween CT3mm and
CTMD scans was e y good in mos s uc u es. Howe e , i was ai o poo in se e al su gically impo an
s uc u es. The g ade o young su geons’ con idence was ela i ely good wi h CTMD scans whe eas he g ade o
con idence was poo wi h CT3mm scans. Taking oge he , CT3mm scans seemed no o be clinically ele an im-
aging me hod.
P e iously, i has been shown ha CRS diagnos ics is possible wi h o he educed adia ion CT- echniques.
Howe e , he su gical aspec s ha e no been deal wi h in hese s udies [7]-[9]. Ou cu en s udy showed ha i
was possible o educe he adia ion dose and inc ease slice hickness wi hou comp omising he excellen bone
and so issue con as . Howe e , success ul endoscopic sinus su ge y (ESS) equi es de ailed knowledge o he
highly a iable ana omy o he nasal ca i ies, he os iomea al uni , and he skull base. In addi ion, he i al
s uc u es especially he op ic ne e and he an e io e hmoid a e y and hei ela ionship o ope a ional a eas
need o be clea .
Mul i-de ec o CT echnology comp ises mul iple de ec o s ha a e equi alen o slices. Con en ional CTMD
comp ises consecu i e slices wi h a hickness o 0.6 - 1.5 mm and causes a adia ion dose o 0.5 mS on a e age.
Technological imp o emen has been apid esul ing in 4- o 8-, 16-, 32-, 40- and 64-de ec o machines. I is
known ha he e is no sa e adia ion dose. In all exposu e quan i ies, he e is a co esponding mu a ional isk
[11]. The head and neck egion, he eyes and hy oid gland a e he mos adiosensi i e o gans. In addi ion o he
cance isk, adia ion-induced ca a ac s a e possible a e mul iple exposu es [3]. Image quali y is a ec ed by
image noise o quan um mo le and is almos always di ec ly ela ed o he adia ion dose. Keeping his in mind,
he cone beam compu ed omog aphy seems o be ele an ecen implemen a ion in CT imaging. Essen ially, i
could be he bes comp omise so a be ween low adia ion and excellen image quali y [12]-[15].
As a conclusion, ou s udy demons a ed ha his me hodology was easy o use and migh ha e some use in
s udies aiming a adia ion dose educ ion. As was expec ed, 3 mm-slice- hick econs uc ion CT had poo e-
p oducibili y and su geon’s con idence. Mo e ecen me hods such as cone beam compu ed omog aphy scans
ha e nowadays mo e ele an dose educ ion po en ial.
Acknowledgemen s
The au ho s hank esea ch nu se Ma ja-Leena Oksanen o he excellen assis ance. The s udy was suppo ed in
pa by esea ch g an s om he Ahokas Founda ion, Compe i i e Resea ch Funding o he Tampe e Uni e si y
Hospi al (G an s 9H067, 9J108, 9L087), he Finnish Medical Socie y Duodecim, he Finnish Socie y o Alle -
gology and Immunology, Finnish Socie y o O o hinola yngology-Head and Neck Su ge y, Helsinki Uni e si y
Cen al Hospi al Resea ch Funds, he Ida Mon i Founda ion, he Jane and Aa os E kko Founda ion, he Väinö
and Laina Ki i Founda ion, and he Y jö Jahnsson Founda ion.