301
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
CHAPTER 16
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ?
Assessing BRICS and
De elopmen Finance
MARKO JUUTINEN
Takeaways o Leading Change
The chap e discusses change on he mac o le el o he eme ging wo ld
o de h ough an analysis o BRICS de elopmen inance. I discusses
BRICS as a new agen in global a ai s, which esponds o he leade ship
demands o a changing wo ld o de . De ined by plu alism and dispe sion
o powe , he eme ging wo ld o de necessi a es a o m o agency wi h a
highe ole ance o di e ence. The ocus o his chap e is on de elopmen .
I seeks o assess BRICS agency pa icula ly in his con ex h ough wo
compe ing hypo heses – BRICS as a challenge and BRICS as a cons uc i e
leade o change. The chap e i s p esen s a c i ical pe spec i e o
de elopmen , hen e iews schola ly pe cep ions and empi ical e idence
on BRICS. I concludes wi h a discussion on he hypo heses. Adop ing
a linea pe spec i e o change, he chap e discusses he challenge o
he BRICS o o hodox de elopmen inance, and sees no e idence o a
challenge. Howe e , he non-linea app oach o change p o ides mo e
nuanced insigh s in o he agency and leade ship ole o he BRICS.
302
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
I
n e na ional a ai s a e unde going signi ican changes. On one hand, he
US has los i s p edominan posi ion in global go e nance. While s ill
powe ul, i is unable o in luence decisi ely in e na ional o ganisa ions. A
he same ime, he in luence o ising powe s and he long-excluded majo i ies
o he Global Sou h has inc eased. Because o his ensuing cacophony o
a g owingly plu alis ic wo ld o de , global go e nance on mul ila e al
le el, like he Wo ld T ade O ganiza ion (WTO), has
been c ippled wi h in e na ional coope a ion shi ing
o egional and in a- egional g oupings. Consequen ly,
in e na ional a ai s a e inc easingly cha ac e ised by
agmen a ion, plu alism, and compe i ion.
As a new ins i u ion o in a- egional and eme ging
powe coope a ion, BRICS p esen s us wi h a case s udy
in o hese ans o ma ions. A e hese changes making
he wo ld less go e nable and mo e con lic -p one? O
is go e nance jus aking new o ms o be e e lec
he inhe en plu alism o he wo ld? Acco ding o
Ami a Acha ya (2016), agmen a ion o go e nance
does no necessa ily imply he end o go e nabili y
and coope a ion. In ac , he a gues ha agmen a ion
and plu alism migh be a means o be e leade ship, mo e c ea i e and
esponsi e o pa icula con ex s and special needs.
This chap e p esen s a case s udy on BRICS, ounded in 2009 by B azil,
Russia, India, and China and joined by Sou h A ica in 2011. The pu pose
o his chap e is o examine how his new ini ia i e ela es o global
go e nance and leade ship. This boils down o he ques ion abou BRICS’
agency: wha kind o agen is i ? Two compe ing hypo heses ame his wo k:
1. BRICS is a challenge 2. BRICS is a cons uc i e leade o change? The
i s hypo hesis de i es om he BRICS challenge heo y, which p oposes
ha BRICS seeks o challenge he cu en sys em and he e o e p omo es
ins abili y in global go e nance. This hypo hesis de ines he ela ion o new
in e na ional o ganisa ions o global go e nance in e ms o linea change.
The al e na i e hypo hesis is based on a non-linea unde s anding o
change, a key heme explo ed in his book. F om a non-linea pe spec i e,
change may be concei ed o as an inhe en ly open p ocess mo e akin o
The pu pose o
his chap e is o
examine how he
BRICS ini ia i e
ela es o global
go e nance and
leade ship.
303
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
c ea i e chaos han planned ha mony. Change is no me ely a eac ion
o some hing o a logical ou come o p eceding causes. Ins ead, changes
occu in con ex s whe e inpu ac o s a e uncon ollable, unknown and
andom. In an inc easingly plu alis ic wo ld o de , whe e dispe sion and
mul iplica ion o poli ical agency, au ho i y and knowledge ha e b oken
linea con inui ies be ween hem, he non-linea pe spec i e o e s a
complemen a y way o unde s and change. Indeed, linea pe spec i es
p esuppose con inui y whe e i does no necessa ily exis . This makes i
di icul o ecognise changes ha come, so o speak, om ou side he box.
The second hypo hesis is ha BRICS is a cons uc i e o ce in global
a ai s. F om his pe spec i e, BRICS is a esponse o o e lec i e o he
eme ging plu alis ic wo ld o de . I can be analysed as a space make
o new al e na i es o go e nance, p omo ion o plu alism as well as
leade ship in di used powe sys em. The pa icula ocus o his chap e
is on BRICS de elopmen inance ini ia i es. I sheds ligh on BRICS’s
ela ion o de elopmen bo h as a pa adigm and p ac ice. To he ex en ha
BRICS c ea es space o new de elopmen p ac ices and pa adigm, and o
he ex en i akes leade ship in sol ing de elopmen issues, i dese es he
label o a cons uc i e leade o change.
The chap e is o ganised as ollows. The i s sec ion discusses de elopmen
as a pa adigm applied by in e na ional inancial ins i u ions, he Wo ld
Bank and he In e na ional Mone a y Fund. The second sec ion discusses
cu en deba es and pe cep ions o BRICS and de ails he wo hypo heses
o he case s udy. The hi d sec ion p esen s an empi ical analysis o BRICS
de elopmen inance ini ia i es, es ablishing he di e ences be ween BRICS
ins i u ions and he dominan mul ila e al inancial ins i u ions. I a gues
ha while BRICS can only wi h di icul y be seen as a p omo e o al e na i e
de elopmen inance, i is none heless opening up a space o e hinking and
un hinking he p edominan ideas and p ac ices o de elopmen inance.
P oblema ising he O hodoxy o De elopmen
The concep o de elopmen means e olu ion in a s a e o being o a
g adual ise om being unde de eloped o being de eloped. The concep
304
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
is desc ip i e in he sense ha i e e s o a p ocess o becoming some hing.
While he e is no s ic classi ica ion o de eloped coun ies, his g oup o
coun ies includes he usual suspec s: he US, Canada, mos o Wes e n
and all o No he n Eu ope, Aus alia, Sou h Ko ea, Swi ze land, and Is ael.
All hese coun ies a e libe al democ acies. Acco ding o some schola s
(e.g., Fe guson, 2011; Fukuyama, 1992), i is he p ac ice o ee ma ke s,
compe i ion and indi iduali y ha de ines libe al democ acies and explains
hei ad ancemen . Libe al democ acies, acco ding o his iew, ha e ound
he pa adigm and he o mula o de elopmen . In his sense, de elopmen
can be amed as a no ma i e concep .
F om an epis emological s andpoin , de elopmen is like any o he
no ma i e concep : i is o a undamen ally subjec i e na u e. The e is no
God o de elopmen – seen and hea d by all o humani y – who could lay
down, explain and each he pa adigm o de elopmen . F om a philosophical
s andpoin , de elopmen is a plu alis concep . While i s ac ual o m and
subs ance a ies om place o place, om people o people, no one can
claim uni e sali y o hei subjec i e ideas. None heless, de elopmen
has i s high p ies s and a mies, like mos o he subjec i e u hs o
poli ical impo ance. Indeed, i was no so long ago ha he Washing on-
based in e na ional inancial ins i u ions (IFIs), he Wo ld Bank G oup
and he In e na ional Mone a y Fund (IMF), domina ed he poli ics o
de elopmen . The o hodoxy which eme ged om hese ins i u ions was
he idea ha ma ke o ces we e he bes mechanism o de elopmen .
This is usually e e ed o as he Washing on Consensus o ee ma ke
undamen alism (e.g., S igli z, 2002).
This o hodoxy o de elopmen was based on he idea ha p i a e ma ke
o ces we e he bes a ailable mechanism o de elopmen and ha he
s a e o being de eloped was equi alen o an un e e ed ma ke economy.
I was no me ely an ideology. I was a poli ical p ac ice by in e na ional
inancial ins i u ions inancing de elopmen p ojec s expec ed o s ep
in when s a es need inancial assis ance (ac ing, o example, as a lende
o las eso ). In p ac ice, he Washing on Consensus mean ha any
coun y in need o inancial help om he IMF and he Wo ld Bank had o
commi i sel o poli ical e o ms. These included p i a iza ions o public
p ope y, cu s in public spending on in as uc u e, educa ion and heal h,
305
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
ade libe alisa ion and he de egula ion o o eign exchange (Babb, 2013;
Glina os, 2008; Saad-Filho, 2010; Williamson, 2004).
The e a e se e al ins umen al easons o he ise o a singula
pa adigm o de elopmen abo e all o he s, wo o which s and ou . The
i s is he o me hegemonic posi ion o he USA, which con ibu ed o
he uni e salisa ion o his singula pa adigm. The second is he epis emic
ounda ion in mains eam economics ha combines subjec i e p e e ences
and no ma i e alues wi h uni e sali y. One o he leading igu es in making
his combina ion was he Aus ian economis Ludwig on Mises. Acco ding
o Mises (1949, p. 21), he backbone o social and economic de elopmen is
he indi idual choices epea ed day a e day in ee ma ke s and media ed
by p ices and money. Fo on Mises, his undamen al subjec i ism o ee
ma ke s is he ounda ion o scien i ic objec i ism: ins ead o no ms and
alues, objec i is science s udies ma ke p e e ences. This p o ides he
only scien i ically e i iable no m o a good socie y: libe y o choose and
ee ma ke s. Von Mises (1949, p. 21) w i es:
[I] is in his subjec i ism ha he objec i i y o ou science lies� Because i is
subjec i is ic and akes he alue judgemen s o ac ing man as ul ima e da a
no open o any u he c i ical examina ion, i is i sel abo e all schools o
dogma ism and e hical doc ines, i is ee om alua ions and p econcei ed
ideas and judgmen s, i is uni e sally alid and absolu ely and plainly human�
Sus ainable use o na u al esou ces is one o he p oblems o his
pe spec i e o de elopmen , pa icula ly ha de eloped coun ies ha e
pollu ed he ea h so ha li e-gi ing adia ion om he sun does no escape
he ea h as i used o. Ins ead, i shines e e wa me on he plas ic ga bage
islands (la ge han some coun ies) su ing he oceanic s eams, which
a e in jeopa dy due o mel ing pola ice caps. This model o de elopmen ,
as Pe u ian diploma and au ho Oswaldo de Ri e o (2010, p. 2–3) a gues,
“ope a es in he same way as a cance ous cell ha goes on des oying
he o ganism o which i li es.” The mos a den p oponen s o ee
ma ke undamen alism a gue ha he ise in ou ma e ial well-being
h ough he a ailabili y o ca s, mobile phones, McDonalds and, mos
impo an ly, he decline in child mo ali y, a e clea indica ions o a ue

306
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
global de elopmen . Howe e , economic de elopmen has been pa alleled
wi h ecological disas e . F om he only uni e sally applicable pe spec i e,
ha is, he p ese a ion o ou common ea h, economic de elopmen has
also b ough abou a apid degene a ion o he na u al en i onmen .
Ano he se o p oblems ela ed o he de elopmen o hodoxy a e social
in na u e. Only a mino i y o he global popula ion, e en in de eloped
coun ies, enjoys economic independence, which is a key aspec o ee
ma ke compe i ion. Wi hou i , ma ke - ela ed choices a e less abou
indi idual p e e ences and mo e abou powe . E en mo e impo an ly,
one should no o ge he millions o people bo n o li e a a subsis ence
le el, wi hou indi idual o communi a ian con ol o e hei li ing
en i onmen s and subjec ed o he o ce o hunge and he money ha
se es global ma ke s (Al a edo, Chancel, Pike y, Saez, & Zucman, 2018,
p. 10–14; FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, & WHO, 2017, p. ii).
Conce n wi h he social e ec s o economic de elopmen is no new.
I was aised by he ounde s o bo h libe alism and communism. Ka l
Ma x’s (1887/2010, p. 313) c i ique o he English ac o ies, whe e he
wo ke becomes “a li ing appendage o he machine,” is s ill applicable o
he swea shops o Indonesia, China, India and o he pa s o he eme ging
and de eloping wo ld. Adam Smi h (1776/2005, p. 637–638) wo ied abou
he e ec s o long hou s o s a iona y ac o y wo k on he in ellec ual and
emo ional abili ies o wo ke s. He w o e ha he high p oduc i i y and
economic gains o he owne may come wi h hea y cos s o he wo ke , “ o
be acqui ed a he expense o his in ellec ual, social, and ma ial i ues.”
I is equally ques ionable whe he i is p ope o millions o people in
de eloped socie ies o li e in po e y h ough bo h unemploymen and
minimum wage employmen , while a weal hy mino i y acqui es he
majo i y o he income (Eh en eich, 2001; Shiple , 2005).
Thus, he p oblems o his old pa adigm a e many, and i has been
objec ed o c i ique om academia, om de eloping coun ies as well
as om wi hin mul ila e al ins i u ions (e.g. Rod ik, 1996; S igli z, 2002;
Mendes Pe ei a, 2016). As a esul , he in e na ional inancial ins i u ions
ha e sough o be e ake in o accoun p oblems o po e y and social
exclusion, employing he concep o inclusi e g ow h o desc ibe shi
away om he old o hodoxy (Mendes Pe ei a, 2016; Saad-Filho, 2010).
307
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
Ye , many schola s ha e a gued ha hese changes do no amoun o
a change in he pa adigm i sel and ha , in spi e o some e o ms, he
Washing on Consensus emains wi hou an al e na i e. (Babb, 2013;
Glina os, 2008; Saad-Filho, 2010).
Agains his backg ound, BRICS has elici ed deba es on how i ela es
o he Washing on Consensus and whe he BRICS o e s al e na i es
o he old de elopmen pa adigm (see e.g., Ban & Bly h, 2013; G ay &
Gills, 2016; Bond & Ga cia, 2015). This chap e seeks o ela e BRICS o
global go e nance h ough he in e na ional inancial ins i u ions and in
pa icula h ough he o hodoxy o de elopmen .
BRICS: A Challenge o a Cons uc i e Leade ?
BRICS schola ship has mos ly ope a ed wi hin linea o e olu iona y
pe spec i es on change. In o he wo ds, he ocus has been on a po en ial
up u e wi h he pas o a g adual imp o emen o i . The BRICS challenge
heo y can be di ided in o wo main hypo heses: a) ha BRICS poses a
challenge o he hie a chy be ween s a es in he cu en mul ila e al sys em
o b) ha i seeks o challenge he sys em. Challenging he hie a chy
be ween s a es is ele an o a s a e-cen ic analysis o in e na ional
ela ions, and pa icula ly o he US and i s allies (e.g., Tammen e al.,
2000). F om an ins i u ionalis pe spec i e, in e na ional ela ions
a e mos ly unde s ood in e ms o ules and no ms, whe eby decision-
making akes place in in e na ional o ganisa ions be ween many s a es
(e.g. Ikenbe y, 2001). F om an ins i u ionalis pe spec i e, i is ele an o
s udy BRICS ela ions in e ms o he cu en ins i u ions, ules and no ms.
In he global ading and inancial sys em, BRICS has al eady engende ed
some changes. In esponse o he US dominance in in e na ional inancial
ins i u ions, BRICS launched wo new inancial ins i u ions in 2014: he
New De elopmen Bank (NDB) and he Con ingen Rese e A angemen
(CRA). Th ee BRICS membe s o he Wo ld T ade O ganisa ion (WTO),
B azil, India and China, played a c ucial ole in upse ing he o me balance
o powe a he WTO by inc easing he in luence o he de eloping wo ld
(Hopewell, 2016). In i s summi decla a ions, BRICS calls o a g ea e
308
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
oice o he de eloping wo ld and demands democ a ic e o ms a he
Uni ed Na ions (UN), Wo ld Bank and IMF (see S uenkel, 2013; Thaku ,
2014). Wha exac ly ha e been he e ec s and objec i es o hese changes?
Is BRICS p omo ing a new kind o economic and social de elopmen and
a new ype o mul ila e alism, o is i simply seeking a g ea e le el o
in luence; i.e., seeking o change he hie a chy be ween s a es?
The BRICS a e no he bes p omo e s no applie s o ma ke -o ien ed
egula o y sys ems, iscal aus e i y and comp ehensi e ade libe alisa ion
(Babb, 2013; Fou cade, 2013; Schmalz & Ebenau, 2012). They ha e ins ead
e ained a ying measu es o di ec o indi ec s a e con ol o e hei
ma ke s (Nölke, en B ink, Simone & May, 2014; S ephen, 2014), mos
no ably China (Jiang, 2014; McNally, 2012; an de Pijl, 2012). Mo eo e ,
in he UN, China and Russia – bo h membe s o he Secu i y Council – ha e
used hei e o powe in suppo o ei he hei s a egic in e es o he
undamen al alues o na ional in eg i y. An example o his is he US-led
humani a ian in e en ion in Sy ia and ega ding he applica ion o he
Responsibili y o P o ec (R2P) commi men (S uenkel, 2014).
The ac ha he BRICS economies di e om libe alised Wes e n
economies does no , howe e , alida e he hypo hesis o sys emic
change. In e nally, he BRICS coun ies a e e y di e en in e ms o
hei economic s uc u es implying ha hey ha e no sha ed economic
ision o a challenging economic al e na i e o o e . Russia is hea ily
dependen on i s oil and gas expo s and has a poo ly di e si ied economy.
India has a booming se ices sec o , bu abou hal o i s popula ion
su i e on small-scale ag icul u e. The e a e as many poo Indians as
he e a e Eu opeans al oge he , bu he e a e also as many ich Indians
as he e a e Ge mans. China, howe e , is he mos impo an ading
pa ne o all wo ld powe s, and while many a e dependen on China,
China is dependen on only a ew. In e es ingly, China’s economic ies
a e much close o he EU and he US han, o example, o India o o he
BRICS coun ies. Mo eo e , China’s economic (and mili a y) clou in
Sou h Asia (India’s neighbou hood) has in ensi ied he al eady deep-
sea ed con lic s be ween he wo.
BRICS has no common agenda o change. Indeed, Babb (2013) has
shown he e is no such hing as a BRICS consensus ha opposes he
309
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
old Washing on Consensus. Duggan (2015), in con as , has a gued ha
BRICS is changing he ules and no ms o globalisa ion wi h a new agenda
o global economic go e nance. His conclusion was based pa ly on he
an ipa hy o BRICS owa ds in e nal e o ms and pa ly on he discou se
o de elopmen in BRICS Summi decla a ions. Ne e heless, Duggan
does no p o e he exis ence o an ac ual agenda. Ins ead, he simply
demons a es he exis ence o a discou se ha de ia es om es ablished
iews on de elopmen . T ue, as Mielniczuk (2013) has a gued, new o
al e na i e discou ses can ha e long-s anding e ec s on he idea ional
cons uc ion o global go e nance h ough c ea ion o sha ed pu poses.
This, howe e , is also no he same as an agenda no does i necessa ily
lead o a o ma ion o new o al e na i e agendas.
The schola ly deba e a ound BRICS does no ende suppo o he
BRICS challenge heo y, in he sense ha BRICS is ac i ely p omo ing
sys emic change. In con as , he T ump adminis a ion clea ly iews
China and Russia in pa icula as challenge s o he US-led in e na ional
sys em. These s a es, acco ding o his iew, do no only seek o o e u n
he hie a chy be ween s a es, bu also challenge he dominance o he
libe al democ acies in in e na ional a ai s. The ecen US Na ional
Secu i y S a egy (T ump, 2017, p. 25) and he Na ional De ence S a egy
(Depa men o De ense [DoD], 2018, p. 2) decla ed ha g ea powe
compe i ion has e u ned and ha challenge s a es seek “ o shape a
wo ld consis en wi h hei au ho i a ian model – gaining e o au ho i y
o e o he na ions’ economic, diploma ic, and secu i y decisions.”
I is indeed ue ha BRICS coun ies ha e used hei posi ion o
challenge he US and de eloped coun y agendas a he UN and WTO.
Howe e , ha does no mean ha hey would no ha e played by he ules.
Disag eemen is ully accep able. Mo eo e , democ a ic decision-making
among pee s is much mo e di icul han managing a hie a chical sys em.
Go e nance o he UN and WTO is oday much less abou hie a chy
be ween s a es ha i was du ing he pos -Cold Wa unipola momen
(e.g., Ikenbe y, 2015; Hopewell, 2016). I is much mo e abou democ a ic
decision-making among pee s. Thus, go e nance is bound o be mo e
p one o disag eemen , shi ing alliances and imely nego ia ions, bu
his is some hing ha comes wi h plu alism and e idences he iabili y o
316
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
han any o he No he n coun ies. As a esul , i appea s ha he s uc u al
and idea ional con inui ies o capi alism bind BRICS o he old. In his
sense, BRICS is indeed no a challenge bu also ha dly a leade o change.
E en hough i appea s ha BRICS is a new ype o ac o on he global
s age, his in e p e a ion hus has se ious limi a ions. BRICS is new in he
sense ha i builds on and p omo es plu alism by b eaking he idea ional
p edominance o he o hodoxy o de elopmen . Ye , while BRICS has
c ea ed a space o discussion abou al e na i e de elopmen models,
he e is li le e idence o BRICS ac ually aking he lead in his discussion.
Pe haps he BRICS p omise is ye o ma e ialise.
Re e ences
Acha ya, A. (2016). The u u e o global go e nance: F agmen a ion may
be ine i able and c ea i e. Global Go e nance, 22(4), 453–460.
Al a edo, F., Chancel, L., Pike y, T., Saez, E. and Zucman, G. (2018).
Wo ld Inequali y Repo 2018. Pa is, F ance: Wo ld Inequali y Lab.
Babb, S. (2013). The Washing on Consensus as ansna ional
policy pa adigm: I s o igins, ajec o y and likely successo .
Re iew o In e na ional Poli ical Economy, 20(2), 268–297.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/09692290.2011.640435
Ban, C. & Bly h, M. (2013). The BRICs and he Washing on Consensus:
An in oduc ion. Re iew o In e na ional Poli ical Economy, 20(2),
241–255. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1080/09692290.2013.779374
Ba ma, N., Chiozza, G., Ra ne and, E., & Webe , S. (2009).
A wo ld wi hou he Wes ? Empi ical pa e ns and heo e ical
implica ions. Chinese Jou nal o In e na ional Poli ics, 2(4), 525–544.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1093/cjip/pop013
Bond, P. (2016). BRICS banking and he deba e o e sub-impe ialism.
Thi d Wo ld Qua e ly, 37(4), 611–629.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/01436597.2015.1128816.
Bond, P., & Ga cia, A. (2015). BRICS: An an i-capi alis c i ique. London,
England: Plu o P ess.
BRICS (2015). U a decla a ion and ac ion plan. 7 h BRICS Summi .

317
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
BRICS (2017). Xiamen decla a ion and ac ion plan. 9 h BRICS Summi .
Depa men o De ense (2018). Summa y o he 2018 na ional de ense
s a egy o he Uni ed S a es o Ame ica. Sha pening he Ame ican
mili a y’s compe i i e edge. Re ie ed om h ps://dod.de ense.go /
Po als/1/Documen s/pubs/2018-Na ional-De ense-S a egy-
Summa y.pd
Duggan, N. (2015). BRICS and he e olu ion o a new agenda wi hin
global go e nance. In Ma ek Rewizo ski (Ed.), The Eu opean Union
and he BRICS. Complex ela ions in he e a o global go e nance
(pp. 11–25). Heidelbe g, Ge many: Sp inge .
Eh en eich, B. (2001). Nickel and dime. On (no ) ge ing by in Ame ica.
New Yo k, NY: Hen y Hol and Company.
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, & WHO (2017). The s a e o ood secu i y and
nu i ion in he wo ld 2017. Building esilience o peace and ood
secu i y. Rome, I aly: FAO.
Fe guson, N. (2011). Ci iliza ion. The Wes and he Res , New Yo k, NY:
Penguin P ess.
Fou cade, M. (2013). The ma e ial and symbolic cons uc ion
o he BRICs: Re lec ions inspi ed by he RIPE special issue.
Re iew o In e na ional Poli ical Economy, 20(2), 256–267.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/09692290.2013.779408
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end o his o y and he las man, New Yo k, NY:
Macmillan.
Glina os, I. (2008). Neolibe al law: Unin ended consequences o ma ke -
iendly law e o ms. Thi d Wo ld Qua e ly, 29(6), 1087–1099.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/01436590802201055
G ay, K. & Gills. B. (2016). Sou h–Sou h coope a ion and he ise
o he Global Sou h. Thi d Wo ld Qua e ly, 37(4), 557–574.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/01436597.2015.1128817
Gudynas, E. (2016). Beyond a ie ies o de elopmen : dispu es
and al e na i es. Thi d Wo ld Qua e ly, 37(4), 721–732.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/01436597.2015.1126504
Hopewell, K. (2016). B eaking he WTO. How eme ging powe s dis up ed he
neolibe al p ojec . S an o d, CA: S an o d Uni e si y P ess.
318
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
Ikenbe y, John G. (2001). A e ic o y. Ins i u ions, s a egic es ain , and
he ebuilding o o de a e majo wa s. P ince on, NJ: P ince on
Uni e si y P ess.
Ikenbe y, John G. (2015). The u u e o mul ila e alism: Go e ning he
wo ld in a pos -hegemonic e a. Japanese Jou nal o Poli ical Science,
16(3), 399–413, h ps://doi.o g/10.1017/S1468109915000158.
IMF (2018). IMF membe s’ quo as and o ing powe , and IMF boa d o
go e no s. Re ie ed om h ps://www.im .o g/ex e nal/np/sec/
memdi /membe s.aspx
Jiang, Y. (2014). Vulga isa ion o Keynesianism in China’s esponse o
he global inancial c isis. Re iew o In e na ional Poli ical Economy,
22(2), 360–390. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/09692290.2014.915227
Juu inen, M. & Käkönen, J. (2016a). Ba le o globalisa ions? BRICS and
US mega- egional ade ag eemen s in a changing wo ld o de . New
Delhi, India: Obse e Resea ch Founda ion
Juu inen, M. & Käkönen, J. (2016b). Blokkien paluu: BRICS-maiden nousu,
USA ja Suomi [Re u n o Blocks: Uni ed S a es, Finland and he
Rise o BRICS]. Helsinki, Finland: In o Kus annus.
Ma x, K. (2010). Capi al. A c i ique o poli ical economy. Volume I. Moscow,
Russia: P og ess Publishe s (O iginal wo k published 1887).
McNally, C. (2012). Sino-capi alism. China’s eeme gence and he
in e na ional poli ical economy. Wo ld Poli ics, 64(4), 741–776.
h ps://doi.o g/S0043887112000202
Mendes Pe ei a, J. (2016). Recycling and expansion: an analysis o he
Wo ld Bank agenda (1989–2014). Thi d Wo ld Qua e ly, 37(5),
818–839. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/01436597.2015.1113871
Mielniczuk, F. (2013). BRICS in he con empo a y wo ld: changing
iden i ies, con e ging in e es s. Thi d Wo ld Qua e ly, 34(6),
1075–1090. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/01436597.2013.802506
Mises, L. on (1949). Human ac ion, a ea ise on economics. New Ha en,
CT: Yale Uni e si y P ess.
Muh , T. (2016). Beyond ‘BRICS’: en heses on Sou h–Sou h coope a ion
in he wen y- i s cen u y. Thi d Wo ld Qua e ly, 37(4), 630–648.
319
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
NDB (2017). NDB’s gene al s a egy 2017–2021. New De elopmen Bank.
Re ie ed om h ps://www.ndb.in /wp-con en /uploads/2017/07/
NDB-S a egy-Final.pd
NDB (2014). Ag eemen on he New De elopmen Bank. Re ie ed om
h ps://www.ndb.in /wp-con en / hemes/ndb/pd /Ag eemen -on-
he-New-De elopmen -Bank.pd
Nölke, A., en B ink, T., Simone, C., & May, C. (2015). Domes ic
s uc u es, o eign economic policies and global economic
o de : Implica ions om he ise o la ge eme ging economies.
Eu opean Jou nal o In e na ional Rela ions, 21(3) 538–567.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1354066114553682
ORF (2015, Augus ). The New De elopmen Bank: Iden i ying s a egic
and ope a ional p io i ies. ORF Policy B ie 17. Re ie ed om
h ps://www.o online.o g/wp-con en /uploads/2015/08/Policy-
b ie _17.pd
Ri e o, Oswaldo de (2010). My h o de elopmen : Non- iable economics and
he c isis o ci iliza ion. London, England: Zed-Books.
Rod ik, D. (1996). Unde s anding economic policy e o m.
Jou nal o Economic Li e a u e, 34(1): 9–41.
Rushe, D. & Haas, B. (2018, Feb ua y 3). T ump ade a i s: Eu ope
h ea ens US bikes, bou bon and bluejeans. The Gua dian.
Re ie ed om h ps://www. hegua dian.com/
Saad-Filho, A. (2010). G ow h, po e y and inequali y: om Washing on
Consensus o inclusi e g ow h [Wo king Pape ]. Re ie ed om
Uni ed Na ions Depa men o Economic and Social A ai s
websi e: h p://www.un.o g/esa/desa/pape s/2010/wp100_2010.pd
Schmalz, S. and Ebenau, M. (2012). A e neolibe alism? B azil, India, and
China in he global economic c isis. Globaliza ions, 9(4), 487–501.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/14747731.2012.699917
Shiple , Da id K. (2005). The wo king poo : In isible in Ame ica. New Yo k,
NY: Random House.
Smi h, A. (2005). An inqui y in o he na u e and causes o he weal h o
na ions. Penn Elec onic Classics Se ies. Hazle on, PA: Penn S a e
Uni e si y (O iginal wo k published 1776).
320
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Leade ship o a Plu alis ic O de ? Assessing BRICS and De elopmen Finance
S ephen, M. D. (2014). Rising powe s, global capi alism and libe al
global go e nance: A his o ical ma e ialis accoun o he BRICs
challenge. Eu opean Jou nal o In e na ional Rela ions, 20(4),
912–938. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1354066114523655
S igli z, J. (2002). Globaliza ion and i s discon en s. New Yo k, NY:
No on & Company.
S uenkel, O. (2013). Towa ds a ‘BRICS’ consensus?
In e na ional A ai s Fo um, 2013, 4(1), 34–34.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23258020.2013.824247
S uenkel, O. (2014). The BRICS and he u u e o R2P. Was Sy ia o
Libya he excep ion? Global Responsibili y o P o ec , 6(1), 3–28.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1163/1875984X-00601002
Tammen, R. L., Kugle , J., Lemke, D., S am III, Allen C., Alsha aba i, C.,
Abdollahin, M. A., El id, B. & O ganski, A.F.K. (2000). Powe
ansi ion s a egies o he 21s cen u y, Washing on, DC: CQ P ess.
Thaku , R. (2014). How ep esen a i e a e BRICS? Thi d Wo ld Qua e ly,
35(10), 1791–1808.
T ump, D. (2017). Na ional Secu i y S a egy. Washing on, DC:
Whi e House.
Van de Pijl, K. (2012). Is he Eas s ill ed? The con ende s a e
and class s uggles in China. Globaliza ions, 9(4), 503–516.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/14747731.2012.699921
Williamson, J. (2004, Augus ). The Washing on Consensus as policy
p esc ip ion o de elopmen . A lec u e deli e ed a he Wo ld
Bank. Re ie ed om h ps://piie.com/publica ions/pape s/
williamson0204.pd
Zhang, B. (2015). Chinese pe cep ions o US e u n o Sou heas Asia
and he p ospec o China’s peace ul ise. Jou nal o Con empo a y
China, 24(91), 176–195. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/10670564.2014.918419
Leading Change in a Complex Wo ld: T ansdisciplina y Pe spec i es
Copy igh © 2019 Tampe e Uni e si y P ess and he au ho s
Edi ed by Anni Kangas, Johanna Kujala, Anna Heikkinen,
An i Lönnq is , Ha i Laihonen and Julia Be hwai e
Tampe e: Tampe e Uni e si y P ess