scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Anisotropic flow and flow fluctuations of identified hadrons in Pb–Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV

Read accessible full text

Anisotropic flow and flow fluctuations of identified hadrons in Pb–Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV

Author: ALICE Collaboration
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Year: 2023
Source: https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/123456789/87863/1/JHEP05%282023%29243.pdf
This is a sel -a chi ed e sion o an o iginal a icle. This e sion
may di e om he o iginal in pagina ion and ypog aphic de ails.
Au ho (s):
Ti le:
Yea :
Ve sion:
Copy igh :
Righ s:
Righ s u l:
Please ci e he o iginal e sion:
CC BY 4.0
h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
Aniso opic low and low luc ua ions o iden i ied had ons in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN
= 5.02 TeV
© CERN, o he bene i o he ALICE Collabo a ion. A icle unded by SCOAP3
Published e sion
ALICE Collabo a ion
ALICE Collabo a ion. (2023). Aniso opic low and low luc ua ions o iden i ied had ons in
Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV. Jou nal o High Ene gy Physics, 2023(5), A icle 243.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)243
2023
JHEP05(2023)243
Published o SISSA by Sp inge
Recei ed:June 22, 2022
Accep ed:Sep embe 1, 2022
Published:May 31, 2023
Aniso opic low and low luc ua ions o iden i ied
had ons in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV
The ALICE collabo a ion
E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
Abs ac : The i s measu emen s o ellip ic low o π±, K±, p+¯p, K0
S,Λ+Λ,φ,Ξ−+Ξ+,
and Ω−+ Ω+using mul ipa icle cumulan s in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV a e
p esen ed. Resul s ob ained wi h wo- ( 2{2}) and ou -pa icle cumulan s ( 2{4}) a e
shown as a unc ion o ans e se momen um, pT, o a ious collision cen ali y in e -
als. Combining he da a o bo h 2{2}and 2{4}also allows us o epo he i s
measu emen s o he mean ellip ic low, ellip ic low luc ua ions, and ela i e ellip ic low
luc ua ions o a ious had on species. These obse ables p obe he e en -by-e en eccen-
ici y luc ua ions in he ini ial s a e and he con ibu ions om he dynamic e olu ion
o he expanding qua k–gluon plasma. The cha ac e is ic ea u es obse ed in p e ious
pT-di e en ial aniso opic low measu emen s o iden i ied had ons wi h wo-pa icle co -
ela ions, namely he mass o de ing a low pTand he app oxima e scaling wi h he numbe
o cons i uen qua ks a in e media e pT, a e simila ly p esen in he ou -pa icle co ela-
ions and he combina ions o 2{2}and 2{4}. In addi ion, a pa icle species dependence
o low luc ua ions is obse ed ha could indica e a signi ican con ibu ion om inal s a e
had onic in e ac ions. The compa ison be ween expe imen al measu emen s and CoLBT
model calcula ions, which combine he a ious physics p ocesses o hyd odynamics, qua k
coalescence, and je agmen a ion, illus a es hei impo ance o e a wide pT ange.
Keywo ds: Collec i e Flow, Hea y Ion Expe imen s, Pa icle Co ela ions and Fluc ua-
ions
A Xi eP in : 2206.04587
Open Access, Copy igh CERN,
o he bene i o he ALICE Collabo a ion.
A icle unded by SCOAP3.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)243
JHEP05(2023)243
Con en s
1 In oduc ion 1
2 Expe imen al se up 3
3 Analysis p ocedu e 4
3.1 E en and ack selec ion 4
3.2 Selec ion o π±,K±, and p+p5
3.3 Recons uc ion o φmesons 5
3.4 Recons uc ion o K0
Sand Λ+Λ6
3.5 Recons uc ion o Ξ−+Ξ+and Ω−+Ω+6
3.6 Flow obse ables 7
3.7 Flow ex ac ion me hods 7
4 Sys ema ic unce ain ies 9
5 Resul s 11
5.1 Mass o de ing and scaling p ope ies 12
5.2 Resul s on low luc ua ions 14
5.3 Compa ison wi h models 16
6 Summa y 20
The ALICE collabo a ion 27
1 In oduc ion
The p ima y goal o he ul a- ela i is ic hea y-ion collision p og amme a he La ge
Had on Collide (LHC) is o s udy he p ope ies o he qua k–gluon plasma (QGP), a
no el s a e o s ongly in e ac ing ma e a high empe a u es and ene gy densi ies [1,2].
S udies o he azimu hal aniso opy o pa icle p oduc ion ha e con ibu ed signi ican ly o
he cha ac e iza ion o he sys em c ea ed in hea y-ion collisions [3,4]. Aniso opic low
e lec s he con e sion o he ini ial s a e spa ial aniso opy in o inal s a e aniso opies in
momen um space. This ansla ion is acili a ed by in e ac ions be ween he cons i uen s
o he qua k–gluon plasma (QGP) [5–7] and a la e s ages, a e had onisa ion, be ween
he p oduced pa icles. Aniso opic low is quan i ied by s udying he azimu hal dis ibu-
ion o pa icles emi ed in he plane ans e se o he beam di ec ion [3]. This is usually
exp essed in e ms o a Fou ie se ies in he azimu hal angle ϕ[8,9] acco ding o
Ed3N
dp3=1
2π
d2N
pTdpTdη(1+2
∞
X
n=1
n(pT, η) cos[n(ϕ−Ψn)]),(1.1)
– 1 –
JHEP05(2023)243
whe e E,N,p,pT,ϕ, and ηa e he ene gy, yield, momen um, ans e se momen um,
azimu hal angle, and pseudo apidi y o pa icles, espec i ely, and Ψnis he azimu hal
angle o he symme y plane o o de n [10,11]. The ncoe icien s a e gi en by
n=hcos[n(ϕ−Ψn)]i,(1.2)
whe e hi deno e an a e age o e all pa icles in a single e en . The second Fou ie coe i-
cien , 2, is usually e e ed o as ellip ic low. I is he dominan ha monic in hea y-ion
collisions wi h la ge alues o impac pa ame e (i.e. non-cen al collisions). I s alue is
sensi i e o some o he basic anspo coe icien s o he QGP, e.g. he shea iscosi y
o e en opy densi y a io (η/s). The s udy o ellip ic low has been ins umen al in es-
ablishing he s ongly-coupled QGP pa adigm, i s in collisions a he Rela i is ic Hea y
Ion Collide (RHIC) [12–15] and, since 2010, in collisions a he La ge Had on Collide
(LHC) [16–18].
A ound he s a o he LHC hea y-ion p og am, i was ealised ha ellip ic low is also
a sensi i e p obe o he ini ial s a e o hea y-ion collisions [19]. I s magni ude luc ua es
om one e en o he o he , e lec ing he e en -by-e en luc ua ing ene gy-densi y p o-
iles o he nuclea o e lap egion p io o he o ma ion o he QGP. Ini ial e en -by-e en
geome y luc ua ions lead o he luc ua ions o e en-ha monic aniso opic low and gene -
a e non-ze o odd ha monics. In ac , he ini ial geome y luc ua ions lead o h k
ni 6=h nik
and he de elopmen o di e en o de symme y planes Ψnin di e en kinema ic egions
in pTo η[20–22]. Thus, a comp ehensi e in es iga ion o he inal s a e low luc ua ions
is c ucial o unde s anding he e en -by-e en ini ial geome y luc ua ions and hei im-
pac on he sys em dynamic e olu ion. S udies o cha ged pa icles in Pb–Pb collisions
a LHC ene gies indica ed non-Gaussian ini ial s a e luc ua ions and, consequen ly, made
i possible o cons ain hei p obabili y dis ibu ion unc ion (p.d. .) [23,24]. S udies o
low luc ua ions ha e so a been pe o med bo h expe imen ally and in heo e ical model
calcula ions o he measu emen s in eg a ed o e a la ge kinema ic ange [25–28]. On
he o he hand, a pT-di e en ial s udy, and in pa icula wi h iden i ied had ons, has no
been done be o e. These s udies can p o ide insigh s on he in e play be ween he expan-
sion o he sys em and i s la e-s age, highly-dissipa i e had onic phase, as well as pa icle
p oduc ion mechanisms.
Simila s udies in he pas o a ious low coe icien s ha e been pi o al in es ablish-
ing he need o include iscous co ec ions in hyd odynamic models and, consequen ly, in
cons aining he alue o η/s o be e y close o he conjec u ed lowe limi o 1/4πcalcu-
la ed o in ini ely s ongly coupled gauge heo ies ia he AdS/CFT co espondence [29].
De ailed s udies o how aniso opic low de elops o di e en pa icle species as a unc-
ion o pT o a ious cen ali y in e als (i.e. an es ima e o he deg ee o o e lap be ween
he wo colliding nuclei) o Pb–Pb collisions a LHC ene gies [26–28] con i med a numbe
o quali a i e ea u es al eady obse ed a RHIC [12–15]: he mass o de ing o na low
pTand he pa icle ype (i.e. mesons e sus ba yons) g ouping a in e media e pT. The
o me o igina es om he in e play be ween adial low and he aniso opic expansion o
he sys em because o a he malized expanding sou ce wi h a common low eloci y o he
p oduced pa icles [30], while he la e is in e p e ed as an indica ion o had on o ma ion
– 2 –
JHEP05(2023)243
ia qua k coalescence in his momen um ange [31,32]. These s udies also e ealed, o he
i s ime, simila quali a i e ea u es in he 1% mos cen al Pb–Pb collisions [27], a ca -
ego y o e en s known as ul acen al wi h no p e ailing ellipsoidal geome y. In addi ion,
new esul s on he non-linea low modes o highe ha monics [33] illus a ed unambigu-
ously ha he a o emen ioned ea u es can s ill be obse ed a e he non-linea esponse
o he sys em, he la e being p opo ional o he p oduc o lowe -o de ini ial spa ial
aniso opies [34–37].
All hese s udies elied on measu ing a ious low ha monics using a ia ions o wo-
pa icle co ela ion echniques. One o he disad an ages o such app oaches is ha hey a e
sensi i e o non- low e ec s, i.e. co ela ions be ween (mainly wo) pa icles no associa ed
wi h he common symme y plane. In o de o supp ess such con ibu ions, one could
measu e mul ipa icle cumulan s which need a la ge da a sample o each he same le el
o unce ain ies as o hei wo-pa icle coun e pa measu emen s. This is possible now
by combining he en i e da a se o Pb–Pb collisions a he cen e-o -mass ene gy pe
nucleon pai √sNN = 5.02 TeV om he LHC Run 2. Fu he mo e, he usage o highe -
o de cumulan s opens up he possibili y o s udy, o he i s ime, he pa icle species
dependence o low luc ua ions.
The i s measu emen s o ellip ic low and low luc ua ions using wo- and ou -pa icle
cumulan s o π±,K±, p+p,K0
S,Λ+Λ,φ,Ξ−+Ξ+, and Ω−+Ω+in Pb–Pb collisions a
√sNN = 5.02 TeV a e p esen ed in his a icle. Resul s ob ained wi h he gene ic ame-
wo k [38–40], which co ec s de ec o ine iciencies and non-uni o mi ies in he azimu hal
accep ance, a e epo ed o a wide ange o ans e se momen a (0.2< pT<6 GeV/c)
in he 10–60% cen ali y in e al. Cen ali y is exp essed as pe cen iles o he inelas ic
had onic c oss sec ion, wi h low pe cen age alues co esponding o head-on collisions.
The s udies a e pe o med sepa a ely o pa icles and an ipa icles, and he esul s a e
compa ible wi hin he s a is ical unce ain ies. The e o e, 2is he a e age be ween e-
sul s o pa icles and an ipa icles which o he es o he a icle will be deno ed as π±,
K±, p+p, e c.
This a icle is o ganized as ollows: he expe imen al se up is p esen ed in sec ion 2,
while he analysis p ocedu e, pa icle iden i ica ion (PID), econs uc ion me hods, and
low measu emen echniques a e desc ibed in sec ion 3. Sec ion 4ou lines he e alua ion
o sys ema ic unce ain ies. The 2o π±,K±, p+p,K0
S,Λ+Λ,φ,Ξ−+Ξ+, and Ω−+Ω+
and he co esponding low luc ua ions a e epo ed and compa ed o hyd odynamic cal-
cula ions in sec ion 5. The a icle concludes wi h a summa y in sec ion 6.
2 Expe imen al se up
The ALICE de ec o [41,42] has been designed o allow de ailed physics s udies unde
he ex eme condi ions c ea ed in hea y-ion collisions. ALICE consis s o a cen al ba el
ha con ains se e al de ec o s wi h ull o limi ed azimu hal co e age and a se o o wa d
de ec o s. The cen al egion is loca ed in a solenoid magne which gene a es up o a 0.5T
ield pa allel o he beam di ec ion.
– 3 –

JHEP05(2023)243
The main acking de ec o s, posi ioned in he cen al ba el, a e he Inne T acking
Sys em (ITS) [41] and he Time P ojec ion Chambe (TPC) [43]. The ITS consis s o six
laye s o silicon de ec o s employing h ee di e en echnologies. The wo inne mos laye s
a e Silicon Pixel De ec o s (SPD), ollowed by wo laye s o Silicon D i De ec o s (SDD).
Finally, he wo ou e mos laye s a e double-sided Silicon S ip De ec o s (SSD). The SPD
is also used o e en selec ion and e ex econs uc ion. The TPC su ounds he ITS and
is also employed o p ecise acking o cha ged pa icles and o pa icle iden i ica ion ia
he speci ic ene gy loss, dE/dx. The dE/dxis ex ac ed using a unca ed-mean p ocedu e,
esul ing in a dE/dx esolu ion o he 5%mos cen al Pb–Pb collisions o a ound 6.5%,
which imp o es o mo e pe iphe al collisions [42]. The de ec o p o ides a sepa a ion by a
leas 2 s anda d de ia ions (σ) o π±,K±, and p+pa pT<0.7 GeV/c and he possibili y
o iden i y pa icles on a s a is ical basis o pT>2 GeV/c [42]. The Time o Fligh de ec o
(TOF) [44] is loca ed a ound he TPC and is used o pa icle iden i ica ion by measu ing
he ligh ime o pa icles om he collision poin wi h a esolu ion o abou 80 ps [42]. The
s a ime o he TOF measu emen is p o ided by he T0 de ec o wi h a esolu ion o
abou 25 ps [42,45], wo a ays o Che enko coun e s co e ing he pseudo apidi y anges
−3.3< η < −3.0(T0C) and 4.6< η < 4.9(T0A), o om a combina o ial algo i hm
ha uses he pa icle a i al imes a he TOF de ec o i sel [42,44]. Bo h me hods o
es ima ing he s a ime a e ully e icien o he 60%mos cen al Pb–Pb collisions. The
TOF p o ides a 3σsepa a ion be ween π±–K±and K±–p+pup o pT= 2.5 GeV/c and
pT= 4 GeV/c, espec i ely [42]. The ITS, TPC, and TOF de ec o s co e he ull azimu h
wi hin |η|<0.9.
In he o wa d egion, wo scin illa o a ays (V0) [46] a e used o igge ing, e en
selec ion, and he de e mina ion o he collision cen ali y [47]. The V0 consis s o wo
sys ems, he V0C and V0A, posi ioned a −3.7< η < −1.7and 2.8< η < 5.1, espec i ely.
In addi ion, wo ungs en-qua z neu on Ze o Deg ee Calo ime e s (ZDCs), ins alled 112.5
me e s om he in e ac ion poin on each side, a e used o e en selec ion.
Mo e de ails on he ALICE se up and he pe o mance o he de ec o s can be ound
in e s. [41,42].
3 Analysis p ocedu e
3.1 E en and ack selec ion
The da a sample used in his analysis consis s o Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV
eco ded by he ALICE de ec o in he yea s 2015 and 2018 LHC da a- aking campaigns.
A minimum bias igge was p o ided by equi ing signals in bo h V0A and V0C scin illa o
a ays. In addi ion, he sample o semi-cen al collisions was enhanced by an online selec-
ion based on he V0 signal ampli udes. Beam-induced backg ound e en s (i.e. beam–gas
in e ac ions) we e emo ed o line u ilizing he V0 and ZDC iming in o ma ion. Pileup o
collisions om di e en bunch c ossings in he TPC was ejec ed by compa ing mul iplici y
es ima es om he V0 de ec o o hose o acking de ec o s a mid apidi y, exploi ing he
di e ence in eadou imes be ween he sys ems. The p ima y e ex posi ion, de e mined
om acks econs uc ed in he ITS and TPC, was equi ed o be wi hin ±10 cm om he
– 4 –
JHEP05(2023)243
nominal in e ac ion poin along he beam di ec ion. These selec ion c i e ia we e me by
app oxima ely 245 million e en s in he 10–60% cen ali y in e al. The collision cen ali y
was es ima ed om he ampli udes o he signals measu ed in he V0 de ec o [47].
Cha ged-pa icle acks, used o measu e he 2o π±,K±, p+p,φ-mesons, and in-
clusi e cha ged pa icles, we e econs uc ed using he ITS and TPC wi hin |η|<0.8and
0.2< pT<10 GeV/c. Each ack was equi ed o ha e a minimum numbe o 70 TPC
space poin s (ou o a maximum o 159) wi h a χ2pe TPC space poin lowe han 4
and a leas 2 hi s in he ITS wi h a χ2pe ITS hi smalle han 36. Mo eo e , acks
wi h a dis ance o closes app oach (DCA) la ge han 2 cm in he longi udinal di ec-
ion we e ejec ed. In he ans e se plane, a pT-dependen DCA selec ion o he o m
0.0105+0.0350 p−1.1
Tcm was applied. These selec ion c i e ia lead o an e iciency o abou
80% o p ima y acks a pT>0.5 GeV/c and con amina ion om ake acks ( andom
associa ions o space poin s) and seconda y cha ged pa icles (i.e. pa icles o igina ing om
weak decays, con e sions, and seconda y had onic in e ac ions in he de ec o ma e ial) o
abou 5% a pT≈1 GeV/c.
3.2 Selec ion o π±,K±, and p+p
Pa icle iden i ica ion o π±,K±, and p+pis pe o med using he dE/dx om he TPC
and he ime o ligh om he TOF sys em, i a ailable. The iden i ica ion is based on
he no malised di e ence be ween he measu ed and he expec ed signal o a gi en species
(σTPC and σTOF, espec i ely). I uses he co ela ion be ween nσTPC and nσTOF in a
Bayesian app oach [48], whe e he signals con e ed in o p obabili ies a e olded wi h he
expec ed abundances (p io s) o each pa icle species. The minimal p obabili y h eshold
has been se o 0.95 o π±and 0.85 o K±and p+p. In addi ion, pa icles a e selec ed
by equi ing |nσTPC|<3and |nσTOF|<3 o each species in he whole pT ange. This
p ocedu e ensu es a high pu i y o he s udied sample, hus educing he unce ain ies
due o pa icle misiden i ica ion. The esul ing pu i y, es ima ed using Mon e Ca lo (MC)
simula ions, is highe han 95% o π± o 0.2< pT<10 GeV/c, abo e 80% o K± o
0.3< pT<6 GeV/c, and eaches alues la ge han 90% o p+p o 0.5< pT<6 GeV/c.
3.3 Recons uc ion o φmesons
The φmeson is econs uc ed in he decay channel φ→K++ K−wi h a b anching
a io o 49.2% [49]. I s decay p oduc s a e selec ed using he same c i e ia o p ima y
K±(see sec ion 3.2). The φmeson yield is ob ained om he in a ian mass (MK+K−)
econs uc ed om all possible K±pai s a e sub ac ing he combina o ial backg ound
e alua ed using he like-sign kaon pai s in each pTand cen ali y in e al. The esul ing
MK+K−dis ibu ion is pa ame ised as a sum o a B ei –Wigne (BW) dis ibu ion and
a hi d-o de polynomial unc ion ha accoun s o esidual con amina ion wi hin he
in a ian mass ange o 0.99 < MK+K−<1.07 GeV/c2. The pT-di e en ial yield o φ
mesons is ex ac ed by in eg a ion o he BW dis ibu ion and used o he 2ex ac ion
oge he wi h he backg ound yield (see eq. 3.14). The p ocedu e o he econs uc ion o
φmeson is iden ical o he p e ious measu emen s [28], while he ex ac ion o 2{4}(pT)
is sligh ly di e en and explained in sec ion 3.7.
– 5 –
JHEP05(2023)243
3.4 Recons uc ion o K0
Sand Λ+Λ
The econs uc ion o K0
Sand Λ+Λis based on iden i ying hei seconda y e ices called
V0s in he decay channels K0
S→π++π−and Λ→p + π−(Λ→p + π+) wi h b anching
a ios o 69.2% and 63.9% [49], espec i ely. Selec ion c i e ia ela ed o he dis inc i e V-
shaped decay opology and equi emen s on he cha ac e is ics o he daugh e pa icles a e
applied o supp ess he la ge combina o ial backg ound. The in a ian mass is calcula ed
assuming ha he daugh e pa icles, iden i ied using he TPC (|nσTPC|<3) o e he en i e
pT ange, a e ei he a π+π−pai o a pπ−(pπ+) pai . The V0candida es a e selec ed wi h
an in a ian mass be ween 0.4 and 0.6 GeV/c2 o K0
Sand 1.08 and 1.16 GeV/c2 o Λ+Λ.
The daugh e acks a e econs uc ed wi hin |η|<0.8using he same TPC ack quali y
equi emen s desc ibed in sec ion 3.1 o cha ged acks. In addi ion, he a io be ween he
numbe o space poin s and he numbe o c ossed ows in he TPC is equi ed o be la ge
han 0.8, he minimum DCA o daugh e acks o he p ima y e ex is 0.1 cm, and he
maximum DCA o daugh e acks o he seconda y e ex is 0.5 cm. Only V0candida es
p oduced a a adial dis ance be ween 5 and 100 cm om he beam line and wi h a cosine o
he poin ing angle ( he angle be ween he line connec ing he p ima y and V0 e ices and
he V0momen um ec o ) la ge han 0.998 a e accep ed. To educe he con amina ion
om Λ+Λand elec on–posi on pai s coming om γcon e sions, an addi ional selec ion
is applied in he A men e os–Podolanski a iables [50] o he K0
Scandida es, simila o
wha is done in e . [28]. To ob ain he pT-di e en ial yield o K0
Sand Λ+Λ, he in a ian
mass dis ibu ions in a ious pTin e als a e pa ame ised as a sum o wo Gaussian
dis ibu ions wi h he same mean and a hi d-o de polynomial unc ion which accoun s
o esidual backg ound. The K0
Sand Λ+Λyields a e ex ac ed by in eg a ion o he
Gaussian dis ibu ions and a e no co ec ed o eed-down om highe mass ba yons (e.g.
Ξ±,Ω±), bu hese ha e a negligible e ec on 2[26].
3.5 Recons uc ion o Ξ−+Ξ+and Ω−+Ω+
The Ξ−+Ξ+and Ω−+Ω+a e econs uc ed h ough he cascade opology o he ollowing
weak decays: Ξ−→Λ + π−(Ξ+→Λ + π+) and Ω−→Λ+K−(Ω+→Λ + K+) wi h
b anching a ios o 99.9% and 67.8% [49], espec i ely, wi h a subsequen Λ(Λ) decay.
Candida es a e ound by applying opological and kinema ic c i e ia i s o selec he V0
wi h an in a ian mass be ween 1.08 and 1.16 GeV/c2and hen o ma ch i wi h one o
he emaining seconda y acks. They a e selec ed by equi ing he DCA be ween he V0
and he ack o be less han 0.3 cm, he cosine o he poin ing angle o be a leas 0.999
and 0.998 o he cascade and V0, espec i ely, he DCA be ween he V0and p ima y
e ex o be la ge han 0.05 cm, he minimum DCA o V0daugh e acks o he p ima y
e ex o be 0.1 cm, he maximum DCA o V0daugh e acks o be 1.0 cm, and he
minimum DCA o he daugh e ack o he p ima y e ex o be 0.03 cm. Only Ξ−+Ξ+
and Ω−+Ω+candida es p oduced a a adial dis ance be ween 0.9 and 100 cm om he
beam line wi h he same adial dis ance epo ed in sec ion 3.4 o V0a e accep ed. Each
o he h ee daugh e acks is also equi ed o ha e pT>0.15 GeV/c wi hin |η|<0.8and
o pass he TPC ack quali y c i e ia de ailed abo e o cha ged acks. In addi ion, he
– 6 –
JHEP05(2023)243
daugh e acks a e checked o compa ibili y wi h he pion, kaon, o p o on hypo heses by
selec ing pa icles wi h |nσTPC|<3 o each species. The pT-di e en ial yield o Ξ−+Ξ+
and Ω−+Ω+is ob ained by i ing he in a ian mass dis ibu ions wi h a sum o wo
Gaussian dis ibu ions wi h he same mean and a hi d-o de polynomial unc ion ha
desc ibe he signal and he backg ound, espec i ely.
3.6 Flow obse ables
A common app oach o s udy he e en -by-e en low luc ua ions o a gi en low coe icien
is by using he wo- and mul ipa icle cumulan s [51,52], which ha e di e en sensi i i ies
o e ec s s emming om non- low and low luc ua ions,
n{2}=h 2
ni1/2+δn,(3.1)
n{4}=h2h 2
ni2−h 4
nii1/4,(3.2)
whe e δndeno es he wo-pa icle non- low e ec s.
Assuming ha low luc ua ion σ nis ela i ely small compa ed o n, which was
ound o be ue o non-cen al hea y-ion collisions a he LHC [53–55], and also assuming
ha non- low e ec s can be expe imen ally emo ed (o la gely supp essed, e.g. by using
app op ia e ηgaps) in wo-pa icle co ela ion measu emen s, he ncan be w i en as [56]
2
n{2}=h ni2+σ2
n,(3.3)
2
n{4} ≈ h ni2−σ2
n,(3.4)
whe e h niand σ na e he mean and luc ua ions o he aniso opic low coe icien , e-
spec i ely. These wo quan i ies co espond o he i s and second momen s o he e en -
by-e en ndis ibu ion. The obse able h niis expec ed o be ee om low luc ua ions
and o only e lec he ue ellip ic low om he low symme y plane.
Bo h h niand σ ncan be calcula ed using he measu ed n{2}and n{4}as
h ni ≈ s 2
n{2}+ 2
n{4}
2,(3.5)
σ n≈s 2
n{2}− 2
n{4}
2.(3.6)
Fu he mo e, he ela i e low luc ua ions F( n)a e de ined as
F( n) = σ n
h ni.(3.7)
3.7 Flow ex ac ion me hods
The measu emen o he pT-di e en ial ncoe icien s o iden i ied had ons is pe o med
using wo- and ou -pa icle cumulan me hod [51], acco ding o
n{2}(pT) = dn{2}
pcn{2},(3.8)
n{4}(pT) = −dn{4}
(−cn{4})3/4.(3.9)
– 7 –
JHEP05(2023)243
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.05
0.1
q
n / {4}
2
20%−10
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.05
0.1
30%−20
0 1 2 3 4 5
) c (GeV/
q
n /
T
p
0
0.05
0.1
q
n / {4}
2
40%−30
0 1 2 3 4 5
) c (GeV/
q
n /
T
p
0
0.05
0.1 50%−40
0 1 2 3 4 5
) c (GeV/
q
n /
T
p
0
0.05
0.1 60%−50
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.05
0.1
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
)p p(
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
φ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
)Λ(Λ
φ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
ALICE
= 5.02 TeV
NN
s
Pb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
Figu e 4. The dependence o 2{4}/nqon pT/nq, whe e nqis he numbe o cons i uen s qua ks,
o di e en pa icle species and cen ali ies in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV. The e ical
e o ba s and he illed boxes ep esen s a is ical and sys ema ic unce ain ies, espec i ely.
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
>
2
<
20%−10
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
30%−20
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
>
2
<
40%−30
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.1
0.2
0.3 50%−40
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.1
0.2
0.3 60%−50
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
±
h
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
±
h
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
ALICE
= 5.02 TeV
NN
s
Pb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
Figu e 5. The dependence o he mean alue o 2(h 2i) on pT o di e en pa icle species and
cen ali ies in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV. The e ical e o ba s and he illed boxes
ep esen s a is ical and sys ema ic unce ain ies, espec i ely.
5.2 Resul s on low luc ua ions
The measu emen s o 2wi h wo- and ou -pa icle cumulan s p o ide he i s oppo uni y
o in es iga e he i s momen s o he 2dis ibu ion o di e en pa icle species. Figu e 5
p esen s he mean alue o 2, deno ed as h 2i, as a unc ion o pT o he same combina ion
– 14 –

JHEP05(2023)243
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
2
σ
20%−10
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
30%−20
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
2
σ
40%−30
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.05
0.1
0.15 50%−40
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.05
0.1
0.15 60%−50
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
±
h
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
±
h
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
ALICE
= 5.02 TeV
NN
s
Pb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
Figu e 6. The pTdependence o he s anda d de ia ion o 2(σ 2) o di e en pa icle species
and cen ali ies in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV. The e ical e o ba s and he illed boxes
ep esen s a is ical and sys ema ic unce ain ies, espec i ely.
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
)
2
F(
20%−10
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
30%−20
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
)
2
F(
40%−30
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
50%−40
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
60%−50
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
±
h
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
±
h
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
ALICE
= 5.02 TeV
NN
s
Pb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
Figu e 7. The ela i e ellip ic low luc ua ions (F( 2)) as a unc ion o pT o di e en pa icle
species and cen ali ies in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV. The e ical e o ba s and he
illed boxes ep esen s a is ical and sys ema ic unce ain ies, espec i ely.
o had ons and cen ali y in e als as in he p e ious igu es. Assuming ha he non-
low con ibu ion in 2
2{2,|∆η|>0.8}is negligible [21,36], his mean alue is calcula ed
acco ding o eq. 3.5 by eplacing 2
2{2}wi h 2
2{2,|∆η|>0.8}measu emen .
Figu e 6p esen s he ans e se momen um dependence o he second momen o he
2dis ibu ion, i.e. he s anda d de ia ion σ 2, measu ed o he i s ime o di e en
– 15 –
JHEP05(2023)243
pa icle species. As in he p e ious case, assuming negligible non- low con ibu ion in
2
2{2,|∆η|>0.8},σ 2is app oxima ed acco ding o eq. 3.6. The da a poin s o bo h
h 2iand σ 2show, as expec ed, he same quali a i e ea u es as in he p e ious cases o
igu es 2and 3: namely he mass o de ing de eloping a low alues o pTand he pa icle
ype g ouping ha is e iden a highe pT.
Combining h 2iand σ 2, one can quan i y he ela i e 2 luc ua ions (F( 2)) acco d-
ing o eq. 3.7. This quan i y is displayed in igu e 7as a unc ion o pTand cen ali y
in e als o he a ious pa icle species p esen ed in his a icle. I can be seen ha o
cen al e en s, he e is no signi ican pTo pa icle species dependence. Howe e , o mo e
pe iphe al collisions, and in pa icula s a ing om he in e al 30–40% and abo e, he
da a poin s exhibi a non-mono onic ans e se momen um dependence, wi h a minimum
in F( 2) ha lies a highe alues o pT o ba yons han o mesons. In addi ion, he F( 2)
o ba yons in 1< pT<3 GeV/c is sys ema ically lowe han o mesons. In e es ingly,
he momen um egion whe e his appa en pa icle ype g ouping de elops o F( 2)does
no coincide wi h he egion whe e a simila g ouping is epo ed o measu emen s o 2.
This could poin o a di e en o igin o hese wo obse a ions. Fo pT>3 GeV/c, all
da a poin s con e ge in o a uni e sal band wi hin he unce ain ies. The o igin o his
cha ac e is ic beha iou o F( 2)is s udied using hyd odynamical models in he ollowing
sec ion.
Finally, o u he s udy he na u e o low luc ua ions, igu e 8p esen s he pT-
dependence o he a io 2{4}/ 2{2,|∆η|>0.8}. This a io is expec ed o be sensi i e
o he luc ua ions wi hin he pic u e o ini ial s a e models. Wi hin hese models, he
spa ial eccen ici y 2 luc ua es om e en o e en . These luc ua ions a e ans e ed
h ough he low iscosi y QGP o he inal s a e and a e imp in ed in how 2 luc ua es.
Since 2∝2, he a io 2{4}/ 2{2,|∆η|>0.8}is expec ed o e lec he a io be ween
2{4}and 2{2}, which ha e posi i e and nega i e con ibu ions om he ini ial eccen ici y
luc ua ions, and hus can p o ide s ong cons ain s on ini ial s a e models. I can be seen
ha o cen al collisions, his a io does no exhibi any signi ican pTo pa icle species
dependence. S a ing om he 20–30% cen ali y in e al, howe e , a dec ease in he a io
can be seen be ween 1 and 5 GeV/c. I becomes p og essi ely mo e p onounced o mo e
pe iphe al e en s. In addi ion, s a ing om he 30–40% cen ali y in e al, and simila o
he pic u e ha de elops o F( 2), he da a poin s indica e a pa icle ype g ouping, wi h
he alues o ba yons being sys ema ically la ge han he ones o mesons. This appa en
dependence on pa icle species highligh s ha inal s a e e ec s play a signi ican ole in
hese obse ables.
5.3 Compa ison wi h models
The compa ison o esul s om aniso opic low s udies wi h hyd odynamic calcula ions
has been ins umen al in cons aining some o he basic anspo coe icien s o he QGP.
Howe e , such compa isons we e limi ed un il now o he low pT egion, i.e. in anges whe e
he mass o de ing discussed in he p e ious sec ion is p ominen . One o he i s a emp s
o p o ide a uni ied physics pic u e h oughou he en i e ans e se momen um ange o
di e en pa icle species was p esen ed ecen ly in e . [60]. In his a icle, he au ho s
– 16 –
JHEP05(2023)243
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
| > 0.8}η∆{2,|
2
/
{4}
2
20%−10
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.6
0.8
1
1.2 30%−20
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
| > 0.8}η∆{2,|
2
/
{4}
2
40%−30
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0.6
0.8
1
1.2 50%−40
0 2 4 6 8 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0.6
0.8
1
1.2 60%−50
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
±
h
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
±
h
±
π
±
K
S
0
K
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
)p p(
)Λ(Λ
)Ξ(Ξ
)Ω(Ω
ALICE
= 5.02 TeV
NN
s
Pb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
Figu e 8. The a io 2{4}/ 2{2,|∆η|>0.8}as a unc ion o pT o di e en pa icle species and
cen ali ies in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV. The e ical e o ba s and he illed boxes
ep esen s a is ical and sys ema ic unce ain ies, espec i ely.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
{4}
2
±
π
±
K
)p p(
±
π
±
K
)p p(
ALICE CoLBT
Hyd o+coal+ ag
= 5.02 TeV
NN
sPb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
20%−10
±
π
±
K
)pp(
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
{4}
2
±
π
±
K
)p p(
±
π
±
K
)p p(
ALICE CoLBT
Hyd o+coal+ ag
= 5.02 TeV
NN
sPb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
50%−40
±
π
±
K
)pp(
Figu e 9. The pT-di e en ial 2{4} o π±,K±, and p+pmeasu ed in Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN =
5.02 TeV compa ed wi h expec a ions o he same quan i y om he CoLBT hyd odynamic model
wi h qua k coalescence [60]. The le and igh panels p esen he compa ison o he 10–20% and
40–50% cen ali y in e als, espec i ely. The e ical e o ba s and he illed boxes ep esen
s a is ical and sys ema ic unce ain ies o he da a, espec i ely. The hickness o he model cu es
e lec he unce ain ies o he hyd odynamic calcula ions.
used he CoLBT hyd odynamic model [59] which allows o he simul aneous desc ip ion
o he e olu ion o pa on showe s and he bulk medium. The la e is p esc ibed by a
(3+1)-D iscous hyd odynamic model ha is ini ialized a τ0= 0.6 m/cand uses a alue
o speci ic shea iscosi y η/s = 0.10. The eeze-ou empe a u e is se o T o = 150 MeV,
beyond which a had onic a e -bu ne desc ibes he in e ac ions be ween had ons. The
emaining pa ame e s o he model we e adjus ed o ep oduce he measu ed yields, pT
– 17 –
JHEP05(2023)243
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
)c (GeV/
T
p
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
{4}
2
±
π
±
K
)p p(
±
π
±
K
)p p(
ALICE CoLBT
Hyd o+ ag
= 5.02 TeV
NN
sPb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
50%−40
±
π
±
K
)pp(
Figu e 10. The pT-di e en ial 2{4} o π±,K±, and p+pmeasu ed in Pb–Pb collisions a
√sNN = 5.02 TeV compa ed wi h expec a ions o he same quan i y om he CoLBT hyd odynamic
model wi hou qua k coalescence [60] in 40–50% cen ali y in e al. The e ical e o ba s and
he illed boxes ep esen s a is ical and sys ema ic unce ain ies o he da a, espec i ely. The
hickness o he model cu es e lec he unce ain ies o he hyd odynamic calcula ions.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0.1
0.2
0.3
>
2
<
±
π
±
K
)p p(
±
π
±
K
)p p(
ALICE
= 5.02 TeV
NN
sPb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
50%−40
(a)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
)c (GeV/
T
p
0.05
0.1
0.15
2
σ
±
π
±
K
)p p(
CoLBT (b)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0.6
0.8
1
{2}
2
/ {4}
2
(c)
Hyd o+coal+ ag
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
)c (GeV/
T
p
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
)
2
F(
(d)
Figu e 11. The pT-di e en ial (a) h 2i, (b) σ 2, (c) 2{4}/ 2{2}, and (d) F( 2) o π±,K±, and
p+pmeasu ed in one indica i e cen ali y in e al (40–50%) o Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN = 5.02 TeV
compa ed wi h expec a ions o he same quan i ies om he CoLBT hyd odynamic model [60].
The e ical e o ba s and he illed boxes ep esen s a is ical and sys ema ic unce ain ies o he
da a, espec i ely. The hickness o he model cu es e lec he unce ain ies o he hyd odynamic
calcula ions.
spec a, and in eg a ed no uniden i ied cha ged had ons in Pb–Pb collisions. One o he
impo an ing edien s which is in oduced in his model is he way had ons eme ge, wi h
he ypical hyd odynamic eeze-ou a low pTbeing complemen ed by a qua k coalescence
p esc ip ion a in e media e pTand agmen a ion a high pT[60].
– 18 –
JHEP05(2023)243
Figu e 9p esen s he e olu ion o 2{4}as a unc ion o pT o π±,K±, and p+p o
wo cha ac e is ic cen ali y in e als, 10–20% (cen al) and 40–50% (pe iphe al), in he
le and igh panels, espec i ely. The measu emen s a e compa ed wi h he expec a ions
o he same pa icle species om he CoLBT hyd odynamic model, ep esen ed by he
shaded bands. I can be seen ha he model desc ibes he pTdependence o 2{4}o e he
en i e pT ange. In pa icula , a low alues o pT(<2–3 GeV/c) whe e he hyd odynamic
expansion o he medium plays a dominan ole, he model desc ibes bo h he inc ease as
a unc ion o pTand he mass o de ing. The 2{4} eaches a peak alue a a ound pT
≈3GeV/c o pions and kaons and a pT≈4GeV/c o p o ons, be o e dec easing a
high pT. This can be na u ally explained by he in e play be ween he hyd odynamical
expansion, had on p oduc ion h ough qua k coalescence, and je agmen a ion [60].
Wi hin he CoLBT model, he hyd odynamic con ibu ion o 2is dominan o all
pa icle species up o pT= 4 GeV/c, whe eas he je agmen a ion plays an inc easingly
impo an ole o pT>6 GeV/c. In he in e media e pT egion (4–6 GeV/c), qua k
coalescence con ibu es in CoLBT o he de elopmen o he alue o 2, e en hough in he
model his mechanism accoun s o less han 25%o he o al pa icle yield. This is because
he alue o 2 om coalescence is signi ican ly la ge han he 2 om agmen a ion up
o 6 GeV/c. The addi ional mechanism o he coalescence p esc ip ion in he model is
impo an o ep oduce he expe imen al esul s quan i a i ely and o p o ide he p ope
connec ion be ween he low and high pT egions. In he o me , he mass o de ing de elops,
while in he la e he agmen a ion is he dominan pa icle p oduc ion mechanism and
no signi ican pa icle species dependence is obse ed.
I is known ha nei he he hyd odynamic expansion no he agmen a ion alone
leads o he p ecise NCQ scaling de elopmen . Such con ibu ions in he inal 2could
consequen ly gi e a na u al explana ion o he signi ican de ia ion om a uni e sal NCQ
scaling obse ed in igu e 4. On he o he hand, he model calcula ion wi h only con-
ibu ions om hyd odynamic expansion and agmen a ion bu wi hou he con ibu ion
om qua k coalescence signi ican ly unde es ima es 2{4} o pTabo e 3 GeV/c o π±,
K±, shown in igu e 10. Ne e heless, he c ossing o 2o pions, kaons, and p o ons can
de elop acco ding o CoLBT wi h a combina ion o he hyd odynamic expansion coupled
only o je agmen a ion ( o de ails e e o igu e 4 in e . [60]). This migh challenge
he p e ailing idea discussed in he li e a u e (see, e.g., e . [61]) ha he c ossing can be
a ibu ed o qua k coalescence. I is impo an o no e ha he de elopmen o he c oss-
ing poin in he absence o coalescence in CoLBT a ises om a pa icle species-dependen
pT alue whe e agmen a ion becomes dominan o e hyd odynamics.
To u he in es iga e he coalescence con ibu ions on low luc ua ions, igu es 11
and 12 p esen he compa ison o he pT-di e en ial h 2i(panel a), σ 2(panel b),
2{4}/ 2{2}(panel c), and F( 2)(panel d) o π±,K±, and p+pwi h he calcula ion
om CoLBT model wi h he combina ions o hyd odynamics, qua k coalescence, and je
agmen a ion as well as wi h CoLBT model wi h only he combina ions o hyd odynamics
and je agmen a ion, espec i ely [60]. The 40–50% cen ali y in e al was chosen as
ep esen a i e o hese compa isons. The model wi hou qua k coalescence con ibu ion
desc ibes quali a i ely he ea u es and he pTdependence o he measu emen s, bu signi -
– 19 –

JHEP05(2023)243
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0.1
0.2
0.3
>
2
<
±
π
±
K
)p p(
±
π
±
K
)p p(
ALICE
= 5.02 TeV
NN
sPb −Pb
| < 0.8η|
50%−40
(a)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
)c (GeV/
T
p
0.05
0.1
0.15
2
σ
±
π
±
K
)p p(
CoLBT (b)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0.6
0.8
1
{2}
2
/ {4}
2
(c)
Hyd o+ ag
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
)c (GeV/
T
p
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
)
2
F(
(d)
Figu e 12. The pT-di e en ial (a) h 2i, (b) σ 2, (c) 2{4}/ 2{2}, and (d) F( 2) o π±,K±,
and p+pmeasu ed in one indica i e cen ali y in e al (40–50%) o Pb–Pb collisions a √sNN =
5.02 TeV compa ed wi h expec a ions o he same quan i ies om he CoLBT hyd odynamic model
wi hou qua k coalescence [60]. The e ical e o ba s and he illed boxes ep esen s a is ical
and sys ema ic unce ain ies o he da a, espec i ely. The hickness o he model cu es e lec he
unce ain ies o he hyd odynamic calcula ions.
ican ly unde es ima es h 2io pion and kaon o pTabo e 3 GeV/c. This is e y di e en
om wha has been obse ed in igu es 9and 11. Despi e he sizable unce ain ies o
CoLBT calcula ions, he con ibu ion om qua k coalescence seems non-negligible o σ 2,
2{4}/ 2{2}, and F( 2), when compa ing he calcula ions o hyd o+coal+ ag (shown in
igu e 11) and hyd o+ ag (shown in igu e 12).
6 Summa y
In summa y, he i s measu emen o pT-di e en ial ellip ic low using wo- and ou -
pa icle cumulan s o π±,K±, p+p,K0
S,Λ+Λ,φ,Ξ−+Ξ+, and Ω−+Ω+in Pb–Pb collisions
a √sNN = 5.02 TeV is p esen ed. The mean ellip ic low, ellip ic low luc ua ions, and
ela i e ellip ic low luc ua ions a e ob ained o a ious pa icle species. Di e ences in
he alue o ela i e low luc ua ions o di e en pa icle species a e obse ed, sugges ing
ha inal s a e had onic in e ac ions u he modi y he low luc ua ions. A dis inc mass
o de ing is ound in he 10–60% cen ali y in e al o pT<3 GeV/c, which a ises om he
in e play be ween he ellip ic and adial low. In he in e media e pT ange, he magni ude
o 2{4},h 2i, and σ 2 o ba yons is la ge han ha o mesons by abou 50%. In addi ion,
pa icles show an app oxima e cons i uen qua k scaling. This scaling is es ed o 2{4},
which is expec ed o measu e low wi h li le (o no) non- low con amina ion. NCQ scaling
desc ibes he da a no be e han ±20%, an accu acy simila o wha was epo ed o he
– 20 –
JHEP05(2023)243
2using wo-pa icle co ela ions. Fu he mo e, he ela i e low luc ua ion F( 2) o he
iden i ied had ons shows an appa en spli ing be ween ba yons and mesons o cen ali y
abo e 30%, which sugges s a signi ican ole o inal-s a e in e ac ions in de eloping his
obse able. Las bu no leas , CoLBT hyd odynamic calcula ions wi h he implemen a ion
o qua k coalescence desc ibe he measu emen s o e a la ge pT ange, which con i ms he
ele ance o he qua k coalescence had oniza ion mechanism in he pa icle p oduc ion in
Pb–Pb collisions a he LHC.
Acknowledgmen s
The ALICE Collabo a ion would like o hank all i s enginee s and echnicians o hei
in aluable con ibu ions o he cons uc ion o he expe imen and he CERN accele a o
eams o he ou s anding pe o mance o he LHC complex. The ALICE Collabo a ion
g a e ully acknowledges he esou ces and suppo p o ided by all G id cen es and he
Wo ldwide LHC Compu ing G id (WLCG) collabo a ion. The ALICE Collabo a ion ac-
knowledges he ollowing unding agencies o hei suppo in building and unning he
ALICE de ec o : A. I. Alikhanyan Na ional Science Labo a o y (Ye e an Physics Ins i-
u e) Founda ion (ANSL), S a e Commi ee o Science and Wo ld Fede a ion o Scien is s
(WFS), A menia; Aus ian Academy o Sciences, Aus ian Science Fund (FWF): [M 2467-
N36] and Na ionals i ung ü Fo schung, Technologie und En wicklung, Aus ia; Minis y
o Communica ions and High Technologies, Na ional Nuclea Resea ch Cen e , Aze baijan;
Conselho Nacional de Desen ol imen o Cien í ico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Financiado a de
Es udos e P oje os (Finep), Fundação de Ampa o à Pesquisa do Es ado de São Paulo
(FAPESP) and Uni e sidade Fede al do Rio G ande do Sul (UFRGS), B azil; Bulga ian
Minis y o Educa ion and Science, wi hin he Na ional Roadmap o Resea ch In as uc-
u es 2020¿2027 (objec CERN), Bulga ia; Minis y o Educa ion o China (MOEC) , Min-
is y o Science & Technology o China (MSTC) and Na ional Na u al Science Founda ion
o China (NSFC), China; Minis y o Science and Educa ion and C oa ian Science Foun-
da ion, C oa ia; Cen o de Aplicaciones Tecnológicas y Desa ollo Nuclea (CEADEN),
Cubaene gía, Cuba; Minis y o Educa ion, You h and Spo s o he Czech Republic, Czech
Republic; The Danish Council o Independen Resea ch | Na u al Sciences, he VILLUM
FONDEN and Danish Na ional Resea ch Founda ion (DNRF), Denma k; Helsinki Ins i-
u e o Physics (HIP), Finland; Commissa ia à l’Ene gie A omique (CEA) and Ins i u
Na ional de Physique Nucléai e e de Physique des Pa icules (IN2P3) and Cen e Na-
ional de la Reche che Scien i ique (CNRS), F ance; Bundesminis e ium ü Bildung und
Fo schung (BMBF) and GSI Helmhol zzen um ü Schwe ionen o schung GmbH, Ge -
many; Gene al Sec e a ia o Resea ch and Technology, Minis y o Educa ion, Resea ch
and Religions, G eece; Na ional Resea ch, De elopmen and Inno a ion O ice, Hunga y;
Depa men o A omic Ene gy Go e nmen o India (DAE), Depa men o Science and
Technology, Go e nmen o India (DST), Uni e si y G an s Commission, Go e nmen o
India (UGC) and Council o Scien i ic and Indus ial Resea ch (CSIR), India; Na ional Re-
sea ch and Inno a ion Agency — BRIN, Indonesia; Is i u o Nazionale di Fisica Nuclea e
(INFN), I aly; Japanese Minis y o Educa ion, Cul u e, Spo s, Science and Technol-
– 21 –
JHEP05(2023)243
ogy (MEXT) and Japan Socie y o he P omo ion o Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Japan;
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia (CONACYT) y Tecnología, h ough Fondo de Coope ación
In e nacional en Ciencia y Tecnología (FONCICYT) and Di ección Gene al de Asun os del
Pe sonal Academico (DGAPA), Mexico; Nede landse O ganisa ie oo We enschappelijk
Onde zoek (NWO), Ne he lands; The Resea ch Council o No way, No way; Commission
on Science and Technology o Sus ainable De elopmen in he Sou h (COMSATS), Pak-
is an; Pon i icia Uni e sidad Ca ólica del Pe ú, Pe u; Minis y o Educa ion and Science,
Na ional Science Cen e and WUT ID-UB, Poland; Ko ea Ins i u e o Science and Technol-
ogy In o ma ion and Na ional Resea ch Founda ion o Ko ea (NRF), Republic o Ko ea;
Minis y o Educa ion and Scien i ic Resea ch, Ins i u e o A omic Physics, Minis y o
Resea ch and Inno a ion and Ins i u e o A omic Physics and Uni e si y Poli ehnica o
Bucha es , Romania; Minis y o Educa ion, Science, Resea ch and Spo o he Slo ak
Republic, Slo akia; Na ional Resea ch Founda ion o Sou h A ica, Sou h A ica; Swedish
Resea ch Council (VR) and Knu & Alice Wallenbe g Founda ion (KAW), Sweden; Eu o-
pean O ganiza ion o Nuclea Resea ch, Swi ze land; Su ana ee Uni e si y o Technology
(SUT), Na ional Science and Technology De elopmen Agency (NSTDA), Thailand Sci-
ence Resea ch and Inno a ion (TSRI) and Na ional Science, Resea ch and Inno a ion Fund
(NSRF), Thailand; Tu kish Ene gy, Nuclea and Mine al Resea ch Agency (TENMAK),
Tu key; Na ional Academy o Sciences o Uk aine, Uk aine; Science and Technology Facil-
i ies Council (STFC), Uni ed Kingdom; Na ional Science Founda ion o he Uni ed S a es
o Ame ica (NSF) and Uni ed S a es Depa men o Ene gy, O ice o Nuclea Physics
(DOE NP), Uni ed S a es o Ame ica. In addi ion, indi idual g oups o membe s ha e e-
cei ed suppo om: Ma ie Skłodowska Cu ie, Eu opean Resea ch Council, S ong 2020 —
Ho izon 2020 (g an nos. 950692, 824093, 896850), Eu opean Union; Academy o Finland
(Cen e o Excellence in Qua k Ma e ) (g an nos. 346327, 346328), Finland; P og ama
de Apoyos pa a la Supe ación del Pe sonal Académico, UNAM, Mexico.
Open Access. This a icle is dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion License (CC-BY 4.0), which pe mi s any use, dis ibu ion and ep oduc ion in
any medium, p o ided he o iginal au ho (s) and sou ce a e c edi ed. SCOAP3suppo s
he goals o he In e na ional Yea o Basic Sciences o Sus ainable De elopmen .
Re e ences
[1] E.V. Shu yak, Qua k-Gluon Plasma and Had onic P oduc ion o Lep ons, Pho ons and
Psions,Phys. Le . B 78 (1978) 150 [INSPIRE].
[2] E.V. Shu yak, Quan um Ch omodynamics and he Theo y o Supe dense Ma e ,Phys. Rep .
61 (1980) 71 [INSPIRE].
[3] J.-Y. Olli aul , Aniso opy as a signa u e o ans e se collec i e low,Phys. Re . D 46
(1992) 229 [INSPIRE].
[4] S.A. Voloshin, A.M. Poskanze and R. Snellings, Collec i e phenomena in non-cen al
nuclea collisions,Landol -Bo ns ein 23 (2010) 293 [a Xi :0809.2949] [INSPIRE].
– 22 –
JHEP05(2023)243
[5] E.V. Shu yak, Theo y and phenomenology o he QCD acuum,Phys. Rep . 115 (1984) 151
[INSPIRE].
[6] J. Cleymans, R.V. Ga ai and E. Suhonen, Qua ks and Gluons a High Tempe a u es and
Densi ies,Phys. Rep . 130 (1986) 217 [INSPIRE].
[7] S.A. Bass, M. Gyulassy, H. S oecke and W. G eine , Signa u es o qua k gluon plasma
o ma ion in high-ene gy hea y ion collisions: A C i ical e iew,J. Phys. G 25 (1999) R1
[hep-ph/9810281] [INSPIRE].
[8] S. Voloshin and Y. Zhang, Flow s udy in ela i is ic nuclea collisions by Fou ie expansion
o Azimu hal pa icle dis ibu ions,Z. Phys. C 70 (1996) 665 [hep-ph/9407282] [INSPIRE].
[9] A.M. Poskanze and S.A. Voloshin, Me hods o analyzing aniso opic low in ela i is ic
nuclea collisions,Phys. Re . C 58 (1998) 1671 [nucl-ex/9805001] [INSPIRE].
[10] B. Al e and G. Roland, Collision geome y luc ua ions and iangula low in hea y-ion
collisions,Phys. Re . C 81 (2010) 054905 [E a um ibid. 82 (2010) 039903]
[a Xi :1003.0194] [INSPIRE].
[11] B.H. Al e , C. Gombeaud, M. Luzum and J.-Y. Olli aul , T iangula low in hyd odynamics
and anspo heo y,Phys. Re . C 82 (2010) 034913 [a Xi :1007.5469] [INSPIRE].
[12] BRAHMS collabo a ion, Qua k gluon plasma and colo glass condensa e a RHIC? The
Pe spec i e om he BRAHMS expe imen ,Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 1 [nucl-ex/0410020]
[INSPIRE].
[13] PHENIX collabo a ion, Fo ma ion o dense pa onic ma e in ela i is ic nucleus-nucleus
collisions a RHIC: Expe imen al e alua ion by he PHENIX collabo a ion,Nucl. Phys. A
757 (2005) 184 [nucl-ex/0410003] [INSPIRE].
[14] PHOBOS collabo a ion, The PHOBOS pe spec i e on disco e ies a RHIC,Nucl. Phys. A
757 (2005) 28 [nucl-ex/0410022] [INSPIRE].
[15] STAR collabo a ion, Expe imen al and heo e ical challenges in he sea ch o he qua k
gluon plasma: The STAR Collabo a ion’s c i ical assessmen o he e idence om RHIC
collisions,Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 102 [nucl-ex/0501009] [INSPIRE].
[16] ALICE collabo a ion, Highe ha monic aniso opic low measu emen s o cha ged pa icles
in Pb-Pb collisions a √sNN = 2.76 TeV,Phys. Re . Le . 107 (2011) 032301
[a Xi :1105.3865] [INSPIRE].
[17] ATLAS collabo a ion, Measu emen o he azimu hal aniso opy o cha ged pa icle
p oduc ion in √sNN = 2.76 TeV lead-lead collisions wi h he ATLAS de ec o ,Phys. Re . C
86 (2012) 014907 [a Xi :1203.3087] [INSPIRE].
[18] CMS collabo a ion, Measu emen o Highe -O de Ha monic Azimu hal Aniso opy in PbPb
Collisions a √sNN = 2.76 TeV,Phys. Re . C 89 (2014) 044906 [a Xi :1310.8651]
[INSPIRE].
[19] F.G. Ga dim, F. G assi, M. Luzum and J.-Y. Olli aul , Mapping he hyd odynamic esponse
o he ini ial geome y in hea y-ion collisions,Phys. Re . C 85 (2012) 024908
[a Xi :1111.6538] [INSPIRE].
[20] CMS collabo a ion, E idence o ans e se momen um and pseudo apidi y dependen e en
plane luc ua ions in PbPb and pPb collisions,Phys. Re . C 92 (2015) 034911
[a Xi :1503.01692] [INSPIRE].
– 23 –
JHEP05(2023)243
S. Padhan 46, D. Pagano 131,54, G. Paić 64, A. Palasciano 49, S. Panebianco 128,
H. Pa k 123, J. Pa k 57, J.E. Pa kkila 32,115, S.P. Pa hak114, R.N. Pa a91, B. Paul 22,
H. Pei 6, T. Pei zmann 58, X. Peng 6, M. Pennisi 24, L.G. Pe ei a 65, H. Pe ei a Da
Cos a 128, D. Pe esunko 140, G.M. Pe ez 7, S. Pe in 128, Y. Pes o 140, V. Pe áček 35,
V. Pe o 140, M. Pe o ici 45, R.P. Pezzi 104,65, S. Piano 56, M. Pikna 12, P. Pillo 104,
O. Pinazza 50,32, L. Pinsky114, C. Pin o 96, S. Pisano 48, M. Płoskoń 74, M. Planinic89,
F. Plique 63, M.G. Poghosyan 87, S. Poli ano 29, N. Poljak 89, A. Pop 45,
S. Po eboeu -Houssais 125, J. Po e 74, V. Pozdniako 141, S.K. P asad 4, S. P asad 47,
R. P eghenella 50, F. P ino 55, C.A. P uneau 134, I. Pshenichno 140, M. Puccio 32,
S. Pucillo 24, Z. Pugelo a106, S. Qiu 84, L. Quaglia 24, R.E. Quishpe114, S. Ragoni 101,
A. Rako oza ind abe 128, L. Ramello 130,55, F. Rami 127, S.A.R. Rami ez 44, T.A. Rancien73,
R. Raniwala 92, S. Raniwala92, S.S. Räsänen 43, R. Ra h 50,47, I. Ra asenga 84,
K.F. Read 87,120, A.R. Redelbach 38, K. Redlich V I,79, A. Rehman20, P. Reichel 63,
F. Reid 32, H.A. Reme-Ness 34, Z. Rescako a37, K. Reyge s 95, A. Riabo 140,
V. Riabo 140, R. Ricci 28, T. Riche 75, M. Rich e 19, A.A. Riedel 96, W. Riegle 32,
F. Riggi 26, C. Ris ea 62, M. Rod íguez Cahuan zi 44, K. Røed 19, R. Rogale 140,
E. Rogochaya 141, T.S. Rogoschinski 63, D. Roh 32, D. Röh ich 20, P.F. Rojas44, S. Rojas
To es 35, P.S. Roki a 133, G. Romanenko 141, F. Ronche i 48, A. Rosano 30,52,
E.D. Rosas64, A. Rossi 53, A. Roy 47, P. Roy100, S. Roy46, N. Rubini 25, O.V. Rueda 75,
D. Ruggiano 133, R. Rui 23, B. Rumyan se 141, P.G. Russek 2, R. Russo 84,
A. Rus amo 81, E. Ryabinkin 140, Y. Ryabo 140, A. Rybicki 107, H. Ry konen 115,
W. Rzesa 133, O.A.M. Saa imaki 43, R. Sadek 104, S. Sadhu 31, S. Sado sky 140,
J. Sae e 20, K. Ša ařík 35, S. Saha 80, B. Sahoo 46, R. Sahoo 47, S. Sahoo60, D. Sahu 47,
P.K. Sahu 60, J. Saini 132, K. Sajdako a37, S. Sakai 123, M.P. Sal an 98, S. Sambyal 91,
T.B. Sa amela110, D. Sa ka 134, N. Sa ka 132, P. Sa ma41, V. Sa i zu 22, V.M. Sa i 96,
M.H.P. Sas 137, J. Schambach 87, H.S. Scheid 63, C. Schiaua 45, R. Schicke 95,
A. Schmah95, C. Schmid 98, H.R. Schmid 94, M.O. Schmid 32, M. Schmid 94,
N.V. Schmid 87, A.R. Schmie 120, R. Scho e 127, J. Schuk a 32, K. Schwa z98,
K. Schweda 98, G. Scioli 25, E. Scompa in 55, J.E. Sege 14, Y. Sekiguchi122,
D. Sekiha a 122, I. Selyuzhenko 98,140, S. Senyuko 127, J.J. Seo 57, D. Se eb yako 140,
L. Še kšny ˙e 96, A. Se cenco 62, T.J. Shaba 67, A. Shabe ai 104, R. Shahoyan32,
A. Shanga ae 140, A. Sha ma90, D. Sha ma 46, H. Sha ma 107, M. Sha ma 91, N. Sha ma90,
S. Sha ma 76, S. Sha ma 91, U. Sha ma 91, A. Sha a 72, O. Sheibani114, K. Shigaki 93,
M. Shimomu a77, S. Shi inkin 140, Q. Shou 39, Y. Sibi iak 140, S. Siddhan a 51,
T. Siemia czuk 79, T.F. Sil a 110, D. Sil e my 75, T. Siman a hammakul105,
R. Simeono 36, G. Simone i32, B. Singh91, B. Singh 96, R. Singh 80, R. Singh 91,
R. Singh 47, S. Singh 15, V.K. Singh 132, V. Singhal 132, T. Sinha 100, B. Si a 12,
M. Si a 130,55, T.B. Skaali19, G. Sko odumo s 95, M. Slupecki 43, N. Smi no 137,
R.J.M. Snellings 58, E.H. Solheim 19, C. Soncco102, J. Song 114, A. Songmoolnak105,
F. So amel 27, S. So ensen 120, R. Spijke s 84, I. Spu owska 107, J. S aa 75, J. S achel 95,
I. S an 62, P.J. S e anic 120, S.F. S ie elmaie 95, D. S occo 104, I. S o ehaug 19,
M.M. S o e ed 34, P. S a mann 135, S. S azzi 25, C.P. S ylianidis84, A.A.P. Suaide 110,
C. Sui e 72, M. Sukhano 140, M. Suljic 32, V. Sumbe ia 91, S. Sumowidagdo 82,
– 30 –

JHEP05(2023)243
S. Swain60, I. Sza ka 12, U. Tabassam13, S.F. Tagha i 96, G. Taillepied 98, J. Takahashi 111,
G.J. Tamba e 20, S. Tang 125,6, Z. Tang 118, J.D. Tapia Takaki 116, N. Tapus124,
L.A. Ta aso ico a 135, M.G. Ta zila 45, G.F. Tassielli 31, A. Tau o 32, A. Telesca 32,
L. Te lizzi 24, C. Te e oli 114, G. Te simono 3, D. Thomas 108, A. Tikhono 140,
A.R. Timmins 114, M. Tkacik106, T. Tkacik 106, A. Toia 63, R. Tokumo o93,
N. Topilskaya 140, M. Toppi 48, F. To ales-Acos a18, T. To k 72, A.G. To es Ramos 31,
A. T i i ó 30,52, A.S. T iolo 30,52, S. T ipa hy 50, T. T ipa hy 46, S. T ogolo 32,
V. T ubniko 3, W.H. T zaska 115, T.P. T zcinski 133, R. Tu isi 53, T.S. T e e 19,
K. Ullaland 20, B. Uluku lu 96, A. U as 126, M. U ioni 54,131, G.L. Usai 22, M. Vala37,
N. Valle 21, S. Valle o 55, L.V.R. an Do emalen58, M. an Leeuwen 84, C.A. an Veen 95,
R.J.G. an Weelden 84, P. Vande Vy e 32, D. Va ga 136, Z. Va ga 136,
M. Va ga-Ko a ago 136, M. Vasileiou 78, A. Vasilie 140, O. Vázquez Doce 96,
V. Veche nin 140, E. Ve cellin 24, S. Ve ga a Limón44, L. Ve mun 98, R. Vé esi 136,
M. Ve weij 58, L. Vicko ic33, Z. Vilakazi121, O. Villalobos Baillie 101, G. Vino 49,
A. Vinog ado 140, T. Vi gili 28, V. Visla icius83, A. Vodopyano 141, B. Volkel 32,
M.A. Völkl 95, K. Voloshin140, S.A. Voloshin 134, G. Volpe 31, B. on Halle 32,
I. Vo obye 96, N. Vozniuk 140, J. V láko á 37, B. Wagne 20, C. Wang 39, D. Wang39,
M. Webe 103, A. Weg zynek 32, F.T. Weiglho e 38, S.C. Wenzel 32, J.P. Wessels 135,
S.L. Weyhmille 137, J. Wiechula 63, J. Wikne 19, G. Wilk 79, J. Wilkinson 98,
G.A. Willems 135, B. Windelband95, M. Winn 128, J.R. W igh 108, W. Wu39, Y. Wu 118,
R. Xu 6, A. Yada 42, A.K. Yada 132, S. Yalcin 71, Y. Yamaguchi93, K. Yamakawa93,
S. Yang20, S. Yano 93, Z. Yin 6, I.-K. Yoo 16, J.H. Yoon 57, S. Yuan20, A. Yuncu 95,
V. Zaccolo 23, C. Zampolli 32, H.J.C. Zanoli58, F. Zanone 95, N. Za dosh i 32,101,
A. Za ochen se 140, P. Zá ada 61, N. Za iyalo 140, M. Zhalo 140, B. Zhang 6, S. Zhang 39,
X. Zhang 6, Y. Zhang118, Z. Zhang 6, M. Zhao 10, V. Zhe ebche skii 140, Y. Zhi10,
N. Zhiga e a140, D. Zhou 6, Y. Zhou 83, J. Zhu 98,6, Y. Zhu6, G. Zino je I,3, N. Zu lo 131,54
1A.I. Alikhanyan Na ional Science Labo a o y (Ye e an Physics Ins i u e) Founda ion, Ye e an,
A menia
2AGH Uni e si y o Science and Technology, C acow, Poland
3Bogolyubo Ins i u e o Theo e ical Physics, Na ional Academy o Sciences o Uk aine, Kie , Uk aine
4Bose Ins i u e, Depa men o Physics and Cen e o As opa icle Physics and Space Science
(CAPSS), Kolka a, India
5Cali o nia Poly echnic S a e Uni e si y, San Luis Obispo, Cali o nia, Uni ed S a es
6Cen al China No mal Uni e si y, Wuhan, China
7Cen o de Aplicaciones Tecnológicas y Desa ollo Nuclea (CEADEN), Ha ana, Cuba
8Cen o de In es igación y de Es udios A anzados (CINVESTAV), Mexico Ci y and Mé ida, Mexico
9Chicago S a e Uni e si y, Chicago, Illinois, Uni ed S a es
10 China Ins i u e o A omic Ene gy, Beijing, China
11 Chungbuk Na ional Uni e si y, Cheongju, Republic o Ko ea
12 Comenius Uni e si y B a isla a, Facul y o Ma hema ics, Physics and In o ma ics, B a isla a, Slo ak
Republic
13 COMSATS Uni e si y Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakis an
14 C eigh on Uni e si y, Omaha, Neb aska, Uni ed S a es
15 Depa men o Physics, Aliga h Muslim Uni e si y, Aliga h, India
16 Depa men o Physics, Pusan Na ional Uni e si y, Pusan, Republic o Ko ea
17 Depa men o Physics, Sejong Uni e si y, Seoul, Republic o Ko ea
– 31 –
JHEP05(2023)243
18 Depa men o Physics, Uni e si y o Cali o nia, Be keley, Cali o nia, Uni ed S a es
19 Depa men o Physics, Uni e si y o Oslo, Oslo, No way
20 Depa men o Physics and Technology, Uni e si y o Be gen, Be gen, No way
21 Dipa imen o di Fisica, Uni e si à di Pa ia, Pa ia, I aly
22 Dipa imen o di Fisica dell’Uni e si à and Sezione INFN, Caglia i, I aly
23 Dipa imen o di Fisica dell’Uni e si à and Sezione INFN, T ies e, I aly
24 Dipa imen o di Fisica dell’Uni e si à and Sezione INFN, Tu in, I aly
25 Dipa imen o di Fisica e As onomia dell’Uni e si à and Sezione INFN, Bologna, I aly
26 Dipa imen o di Fisica e As onomia dell’Uni e si à and Sezione INFN, Ca ania, I aly
27 Dipa imen o di Fisica e As onomia dell’Uni e si à and Sezione INFN, Pado a, I aly
28 Dipa imen o di Fisica ‘E.R. Caianiello’ dell’Uni e si à and G uppo Collega o INFN, Sale no, I aly
29 Dipa imen o DISAT del Poli ecnico and Sezione INFN, Tu in, I aly
30 Dipa imen o di Scienze MIFT, Uni e si à di Messina, Messina, I aly
31 Dipa imen o In e a eneo di Fisica ‘M. Me lin’ and Sezione INFN, Ba i, I aly
32 Eu opean O ganiza ion o Nuclea Resea ch (CERN), Gene a, Swi ze land
33 Facul y o Elec ical Enginee ing, Mechanical Enginee ing and Na al A chi ec u e, Uni e si y o Spli ,
Spli , C oa ia
34 Facul y o Enginee ing and Science, Wes e n No way Uni e si y o Applied Sciences, Be gen, No way
35 Facul y o Nuclea Sciences and Physical Enginee ing, Czech Technical Uni e si y in P ague, P ague,
Czech Republic
36 Facul y o Physics, So ia Uni e si y, So ia, Bulga ia
37 Facul y o Science, P.J. Ša á ik Uni e si y, Košice, Slo ak Republic
38 F ank u Ins i u e o Ad anced S udies, Johann Wol gang Goe he-Uni e si ä F ank u , F ank u ,
Ge many
39 Fudan Uni e si y, Shanghai, China
40 Gangneung-Wonju Na ional Uni e si y, Gangneung, Republic o Ko ea
41 Gauha i Uni e si y, Depa men o Physics, Guwaha i, India
42 Helmhol z-Ins i u ü S ahlen- und Ke nphysik, Rheinische F ied ich-Wilhelms-Uni e si ä Bonn,
Bonn, Ge many
43 Helsinki Ins i u e o Physics (HIP), Helsinki, Finland
44 High Ene gy Physics G oup, Uni e sidad Au ónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
45 Ho ia Hulubei Na ional Ins i u e o Physics and Nuclea Enginee ing, Bucha es , Romania
46 Indian Ins i u e o Technology Bombay (IIT), Mumbai, India
47 Indian Ins i u e o Technology Indo e, Indo e, India
48 INFN, Labo a o i Nazionali di F asca i, F asca i, I aly
49 INFN, Sezione di Ba i, Ba i, I aly
50 INFN, Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, I aly
51 INFN, Sezione di Caglia i, Caglia i, I aly
52 INFN, Sezione di Ca ania, Ca ania, I aly
53 INFN, Sezione di Pado a, Pado a, I aly
54 INFN, Sezione di Pa ia, Pa ia, I aly
55 INFN, Sezione di To ino, Tu in, I aly
56 INFN, Sezione di T ies e, T ies e, I aly
57 Inha Uni e si y, Incheon, Republic o Ko ea
58 Ins i u e o G a i a ional and Suba omic Physics (GRASP), U ech Uni e si y/Nikhe , U ech ,
Ne he lands
59 Ins i u e o Expe imen al Physics, Slo ak Academy o Sciences, Košice, Slo ak Republic
60 Ins i u e o Physics, Homi Bhabha Na ional Ins i u e, Bhubaneswa , India
61 Ins i u e o Physics o he Czech Academy o Sciences, P ague, Czech Republic
62 Ins i u e o Space Science (ISS), Bucha es , Romania
63 Ins i u ü Ke nphysik, Johann Wol gang Goe he-Uni e si ä F ank u , F ank u , Ge many
64 Ins i u o de Ciencias Nuclea es, Uni e sidad Nacional Au ónoma de México, Mexico Ci y, Mexico
– 32 –
JHEP05(2023)243
65 Ins i u o de Física, Uni e sidade Fede al do Rio G ande do Sul (UFRGS), Po o Aleg e, B azil
66 Ins i u o de Física, Uni e sidad Nacional Au ónoma de México, Mexico Ci y, Mexico
67 iThemba LABS, Na ional Resea ch Founda ion, Some se Wes , Sou h A ica
68 Jeonbuk Na ional Uni e si y, Jeonju, Republic o Ko ea
69 Johann-Wol gang-Goe he Uni e si ä F ank u Ins i u ü In o ma ik, Fachbe eich In o ma ik und
Ma hema ik, F ank u , Ge many
70 Ko ea Ins i u e o Science and Technology In o ma ion, Daejeon, Republic o Ko ea
71 KTO Ka a ay Uni e si y, Konya, Tu key
72 Labo a oi e de Physique des 2 In inis, I ène Jolio -Cu ie, O say, F ance
73 Labo a oi e de Physique Suba omique e de Cosmologie, Uni e si é G enoble-Alpes, CNRS-IN2P3,
G enoble, F ance
74 Law ence Be keley Na ional Labo a o y, Be keley, Cali o nia, Uni ed S a es
75 Lund Uni e si y Depa men o Physics, Di ision o Pa icle Physics, Lund, Sweden
76 Nagasaki Ins i u e o Applied Science, Nagasaki, Japan
77 Na a Women’s Uni e si y (NWU), Na a, Japan
78 Na ional and Kapodis ian Uni e si y o A hens, School o Science, Depa men o Physics , A hens,
G eece
79 Na ional Cen e o Nuclea Resea ch, Wa saw, Poland
80 Na ional Ins i u e o Science Educa ion and Resea ch, Homi Bhabha Na ional Ins i u e, Ja ni, India
81 Na ional Nuclea Resea ch Cen e , Baku, Aze baijan
82 Na ional Resea ch and Inno a ion Agency — BRIN, Jaka a, Indonesia
83 Niels Boh Ins i u e, Uni e si y o Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denma k
84 Nikhe , Na ional ins i u e o suba omic physics, Ams e dam, Ne he lands
85 Nuclea Physics G oup, STFC Da esbu y Labo a o y, Da esbu y, Uni ed Kingdom
86 Nuclea Physics Ins i u e o he Czech Academy o Sciences, Husinec-Řež, Czech Republic
87 Oak Ridge Na ional Labo a o y, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Uni ed S a es
88 Ohio S a e Uni e si y, Columbus, Ohio, Uni ed S a es
89 Physics depa men , Facul y o science, Uni e si y o Zag eb, Zag eb, C oa ia
90 Physics Depa men , Panjab Uni e si y, Chandiga h, India
91 Physics Depa men , Uni e si y o Jammu, Jammu, India
92 Physics Depa men , Uni e si y o Rajas han, Jaipu , India
93 Physics P og am and In e na ional Ins i u e o Sus ainabili y wi h Kno ed Chi al Me a Ma e
(SKCM2), Hi oshima Uni e si y, Hi oshima, Japan
94 Physikalisches Ins i u , Ebe ha d-Ka ls-Uni e si ä Tübingen, Tübingen, Ge many
95 Physikalisches Ins i u , Rup ech -Ka ls-Uni e si ä Heidelbe g, Heidelbe g, Ge many
96 Physik Depa men , Technische Uni e si ä München, Munich, Ge many
97 Poli ecnico di Ba i and Sezione INFN, Ba i, I aly
98 Resea ch Di ision and Ex eMe Ma e Ins i u e EMMI, GSI Helmhol zzen um ü
Schwe ionen o schung GmbH, Da ms ad , Ge many
99 Saga Uni e si y, Saga, Japan
100 Saha Ins i u e o Nuclea Physics, Homi Bhabha Na ional Ins i u e, Kolka a, India
101 School o Physics and As onomy, Uni e si y o Bi mingham, Bi mingham, Uni ed Kingdom
102 Sección Física, Depa amen o de Ciencias, Pon i icia Uni e sidad Ca ólica del Pe ú, Lima, Pe u
103 S e an Meye Ins i u ü Suba oma e Physik (SMI), Vienna, Aus ia
104 SUBATECH, IMT A lan ique, Nan es Uni e si é, CNRS-IN2P3, Nan es, F ance
105 Su ana ee Uni e si y o Technology, Nakhon Ra chasima, Thailand
106 Technical Uni e si y o Košice, Košice, Slo ak Republic
107 The Hen yk Niewodniczanski Ins i u e o Nuclea Physics, Polish Academy o Sciences, C acow,
Poland
108 The Uni e si y o Texas a Aus in, Aus in, Texas, Uni ed S a es
109 Uni e sidad Au ónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico
110 Uni e sidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, B azil
– 33 –
JHEP05(2023)243
111 Uni e sidade Es adual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, B azil
112 Uni e sidade Fede al do ABC, San o And e, B azil
113 Uni e si y o Cape Town, Cape Town, Sou h A ica
114 Uni e si y o Hous on, Hous on, Texas, Uni ed S a es
115 Uni e si y o Jy äskylä, Jy äskylä, Finland
116 Uni e si y o Kansas, Law ence, Kansas, Uni ed S a es
117 Uni e si y o Li e pool, Li e pool, Uni ed Kingdom
118 Uni e si y o Science and Technology o China, He ei, China
119 Uni e si y o Sou h-Eas e n No way, Kongsbe g, No way
120 Uni e si y o Tennessee, Knox ille, Tennessee, Uni ed S a es
121 Uni e si y o he Wi wa e s and, Johannesbu g, Sou h A ica
122 Uni e si y o Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
123 Uni e si y o Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
124 Uni e si y Poli ehnica o Bucha es , Bucha es , Romania
125 Uni e si é Cle mon Au e gne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Cle mon -Fe and, F ance
126 Uni e si é de Lyon, CNRS/IN2P3, Ins i u de Physique des 2 In inis de Lyon, Lyon, F ance
127 Uni e si é de S asbou g, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000 S asbou g, F ance, S asbou g, F ance
128 Uni e si é Pa is-Saclay Cen e d’E udes de Saclay (CEA), IRFU, Dépa men de Physique Nucléai e
(DPhN), Saclay, F ance
129 Uni e si à degli S udi di Foggia, Foggia, I aly
130 Uni e si à del Piemon e O ien ale, Ve celli, I aly
131 Uni e si à di B escia, B escia, I aly
132 Va iable Ene gy Cyclo on Cen e, Homi Bhabha Na ional Ins i u e, Kolka a, India
133 Wa saw Uni e si y o Technology, Wa saw, Poland
134 Wayne S a e Uni e si y, De oi , Michigan, Uni ed S a es
135 Wes älische Wilhelms-Uni e si ä Müns e , Ins i u ü Ke nphysik, Müns e , Ge many
136 Wigne Resea ch Cen e o Physics, Budapes , Hunga y
137 Yale Uni e si y, New Ha en, Connec icu , Uni ed S a es
138 Yonsei Uni e si y, Seoul, Republic o Ko ea
139 Zen um ü Technologie und T ans e (ZTT), Wo ms, Ge many
140 A ilia ed wi h an ins i u e co e ed by a coope a ion ag eemen wi h CERN
141 A ilia ed wi h an in e na ional labo a o y co e ed by a coope a ion ag eemen wi h CERN
IDeceased
II Also a : Max-Planck-Ins i u ü Physik, Munich, Ge many
III Also a : I alian Na ional Agency o New Technologies, Ene gy and Sus ainable Economic
De elopmen (ENEA), Bologna, I aly
IV Also a : Dipa imen o DET del Poli ecnico di To ino, Tu in, I aly
VAlso a : Depa men o Applied Physics, Aliga h Muslim Uni e si y, Aliga h, India
V I Also a : Ins i u e o Theo e ical Physics, Uni e si y o W oclaw, Poland
V II Also a : An ins i u ion co e ed by a coope a ion ag eemen wi h CERN
– 34 –