scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Large differences in catch per unit of effort between two minnow trap models

Read accessible full text

Large differences in catch per unit of effort between two minnow trap models

Author: Merilä, Juha,Lakka, Hanna-Kaisa,Eloranta, Antti
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2013
Source: https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/123456789/43997/2/175605006151.pdf
This is an elec onic ep in o he o iginal a icle.
This ep in may di e om he o iginal in pagina ion and ypog aphic de ail.
Au ho (s):
Ti le:
Yea :
Ve sion:
Please ci e he o iginal e sion:
All ma e ial supplied ia JYX is p o ec ed by copy igh and o he in ellec ual p ope y igh s, and
duplica ion o sale o all o pa o any o he eposi o y collec ions is no pe mi ed, excep ha
ma e ial may be duplica ed by you o you esea ch use o educa ional pu poses in elec onic o
p in o m. You mus ob ain pe mission o any o he use. Elec onic o p in copies may no be
o e ed, whe he o sale o o he wise o anyone who is no an au ho ised use .
La ge di e ences in ca ch pe uni o e o be ween wo minnow ap models
Me ilä, Juha; Lakka, Hanna-Kaisa; Elo an a, An i
Me ilä, J., Lakka, H.-K., & Elo an a, A. (2013). La ge di e ences in ca ch pe uni o
e o be ween wo minnow ap models. BMC Resea ch No es, 6(151).
h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/1756-0500-6-151
2013
RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access
La ge di e ences in ca ch pe uni o e o
be ween wo minnow ap models
Juha Me ilä
1*
, Hanna-Kaisa Lakka
2
and An i Elo an a
3
Abs ac
Backg ound: Li le is known abou a ia ion in ca ch pe uni o e o (CPUE) in s ickleback ishe ies, o he ac o s
explaining his a ia ion. We in es iga ed how nine-spined s ickleback (Pungi ius pungi ius) CPUE was in luenced by
ap model by compa ing he CPUEs o wo e y simila minnow ap models ished side-by-side in a pai ed
expe imen al design.
Resul s: The gal anized ap ype (mean CPUE = 1.31 ish h
–1
) ou - ished he black ap ype (mean CPUE = 0.20 ish
h
–1
) consis en ly, and yielded on a e age 81% mo e ish.
Conclusions: The esul s demons a e ha small di e ences in ap appea ance can ha e la ge impac s on CPUE.
This has implica ions o s udies designed o in es iga e abundance and occu ence o ish using minnow aps.
Keywo ds: Fishe y, T ap, Ca chabili y, CPUE, Pungi ius pungi ius, S ickleback, Funnel ap
Backg ound
Ca ch pe uni o e o (CPUE) is an impo an a iable
in ishe ies sciences, as i p o ides means o moni o
popula ion size ends (e.g. [1]), ela i e abundance o
species in di e en habi a s and si es (e.g. [2]), as well as
o compa e e iciency o di e en ishing gea [3-5]. I is
well es ablished ha CPUE can be in luenced by a ious
en i onmen al ac o s [6-10], show p o ound seasonal
a ia ion [11] and be sensi i e o he ype o ishing gea
used [4,5,12,13]. Fo ins ance, Guy e al. [3] compa ed
CPUE o whi e c appies (Pomoxis annula is) as es i-
ma ed om gill and ap ne s, and ound li le co es-
pondence be ween he es ima es ob ained wi h di e en
gea ac oss di e en ese oi s and yea s.
Unde s andably, ac o s in luencing he CPUE ha e been
mainly s udied in species o comme cial in e es . Less e -
o has been pu owa ds s udying ac o s ha in luence
CPUE in species such as s icklebacks (Gas e os idae),
which a e popula models o ecological and e olu iona y
biology esea ch (e.g. [14,15]) ye hold li le o no comme -
cial in e es . Recen ly, in luence o ap ype and use o bai
on CPUE o nine-spined s icklebacks (Pungi ius pungi ius)
was in es iga ed [16], and clea ap ype and bai e ec s
we e e ealed. Howe e , he abo e men ioned s udy is hus
a he only quan i a i e s udy ocused on ac o s in luen-
cing CPUE in s icklebacks, and was es ic ed o wo col-
lapsible ap ypes.
The aim o his s udy was o es whe he wo com-
monly used and supe icially simila me allic minnow
ap ypes di e in hei CPUE when ca ching nine-
spined s icklebacks.
Me hods
The apping was conduc ed in Ry ilampi (ca. 66°23
0
07″
N, 29°18
0
42″E), which is an isola ed pond (su ace a ea =
4.98 ha) wi h maximum dep h o ca. 5.1 m. The wo di -
e en minnow ap ypes, bo h manu ac u ed by F abill
(Jackson, Wisconsin, USA) a e pic u ed in Figu e 1. One
o he ap ypes was a gal anized unnel shaped ap
(also known as GEE Minnow ap) measu ing 419 mm ×
229 mm (model # 1279), hence o h e e ed o as he sil-
e ap. The o he ap ype (model # 1271) was simila
o he sil e ap in i s dimensions, bu had a black inyl
coa ing (Figu e 1a), and is hence o h e e ed o as he
black ap. Mo eo e , while he ne ing in he sil e ap
is squa e-shaped, ha o he back ap is diamond-shape
(Figu e 1a). Bo h ap ypes ha e wo ound en ances
(ca. 25 mm in diame e ; Figu e 1b) and a e widely used
by esea che s (e.g. [7,17]) and ishe men (see Discus-
sion). All aps we e se unbai ed.
* Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]
1
Ecological Gene ics Resea ch Uni , Depa men o Biosciences, Uni e si y o
Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
Full lis o au ho in o ma ion is a ailable a he end o he a icle
© 2013 Me ilä e al.; licensee BioMed Cen al L d. This is an Open Access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e
Commons A ibu ion License (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/2.0), which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and
ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal wo k is p ope ly ci ed.
Me ilä e al. BMC Resea ch No es 2013, 6:151
h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1756-0500/6/151
Se 1: Six pai s o aps, each consis ing o one sil e
and one black ap, we e se on July 7 2012 be ween
20.00–20.30, and e ie ed July 8 2012 be ween 13.00–
14.00. This co esponds o an a e age soak ime o
16.6 h ( ange: 16.4–16.7) and 199 ap-hou s (=12
aps × 16.6 h). The aps we e lowe ed o he bo om in
a pai wise ashion a dep hs anging om 2–3.8 m, and
hei dis ance om sho e anged be ween 5 and 50 m.
When he aps we e e ie ed, he numbe o nine-
spined s icklebacks in each ap was coun ed and
eco ded. Wa e empe a u e du ing he apping was
abou 18°C a a dep h o 10 cm om he su ace.
Se 2: A second se , also consis ing o six pai s o
aps, was se on July 10 2012 be ween 06.15–06.35, and
e ie ed July 11 be ween 06.20–06.35. This co esponds
o an a e age soak ime o 24.0 h ( ange: 23.9–24.3) and
288 ap-hou s. Se ing was done o he wise in a simila
ashion as in Se 1, bu he aps we e ished om he
sho e a dep hs be ween 0.6–1 m. The ap pai s in his
se we e loca ed 5–50 m apa om each o he .
The CPUE o a gi en ap was es ima ed as he num-
be o ish caugh di ided by ap-speci ic soak ime,
yielding an es ima e o numbe o ish caugh pe hou .
The da a was analyzed using a gene alized linea
mixed model (GLMM) in which he numbe o ish
caugh was ea ed as Poisson dis ibu ed esponse a i-
able, and he ap ype and se (i.e. he wo ca ching oc-
casions) as ac o s. This analysis was supplemen ed wi h
wo non-pa ame ic uni a ia e es s sui ed o analyzing
da a o ma ched-pai na u e. Fi s , a Wilcoxon Signed
Rank es was used o es whe he he e was a di e -
ence in CPUE be ween pai ed sil e and black aps.
Second, a mo e conse a i e sign es was used o he
same e ec . Two- ailed es s we e used. All analyses
we e conduc ed using JMP s a is ical so wa e ( e . 9.0.0;
SAS Ins i u e Inc.) wi h an Apple Macin osh pla o m.
Da a accessibili y
All he da a is gi en in Table 1.
E hics s a emen
The wo k desc ibed in his pape does no cons i u e an
animal expe imen in legal sense, and hence, he only e-
qui ed pe missions we e na ional pe sonal ishing
licenses o 2012 (possessed by all au ho s) and a license
(# 3087/41/2011) om Me sähalli us, owne o he wa e
body whe e he ishing was done.
Resul s
A o al o 317 ish we e caugh , o which 276 we e om
sil e aps and 41 om black aps (Table 1). GLMM
showed ha he numbe o ish caugh di e ed signi i-
can ly be ween ap ypes (χ
2
= 140.12, P< 0.001) and he
wo se s (χ
2
= 98.09, P< 0.001; Figu e 1). Also, he ap-
ype*se in e ac ion was signi ican (χ
2
= 6.04, P= 0.014),
showing ha he di e ence be ween ap ypes was less
p onounced in he second as compa ed o he i s se
(Figu e 2).
Figu e 1 The wo minnow ap ypes used. (a) View om abo e
and (b) om ap en ance.
Table 1 Numbe o nine-spined s icklebacks caugh in
each o he aps in he wo se s
Numbe o ish
Se T ap-pai Sil e ap Black ap
1 1 46 2
1 2 43 17
1 3 32 5
1 4 47 0
1 5 24 8
1 6 33 7
27 7 1
28 4 0
29 7 0
210 16 0
211 11 0
212 6 1
Me ilä e al. BMC Resea ch No es 2013, 6:151 Page 2 o 4
h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1756-0500/6/151
Wilcoxon Signed Rank es con i med he GLMM e-
sul s: CPUE in sil e aps (mean ± S.E. = 1.31 ± 0.31) was
signi ican ly (on a e age 6.5 imes) la ge han in black
aps (mean ± S.E = 0.20 ± 0.09; S=-39.00, P= 0.0005).
The same conclusion was ein o ced by he sign es
(M=–6.00, P= 0.0005).
Discussion
The esul s o his s udy clea ly demons a e ha he sil-
e aps ou - ished he black aps, wi h a la ge ma gin.
This was no en i ely unexpec ed, as ea lie expe iences
in apping h ee-spined s icklebacks (Gas e os eus
aculea us) wi h hese same aps in no he n Finland
ha e le an (unquan i ied) imp ession ha he sil e
aps a e mo e e ec i e han he black aps. Simila es-
imonies a e also a ailable om No h Ame ica: se e al
cus ome e iews (www.cabelas.com) o hese aps s a e
ha sil e aps ca ch mo e minnows, shine s and c aw-
ish han black aps (e.g. Anonymous, Ma ch 10 2010:
“Side by side, I’ll ha e wo- h ee imes mo e minnows in
he gal anized ap s. black coa ed ap”;
Ch is omiowa, July 3 2007: “...side by side he black
aps agains he s eel and s eel always pull in mo e
bai ”). Hence, he be e ca ch a e o sil e o e black
aps appea s o be a gene al –albei as ye poo ly quan-
i ied –phenomenon ac oss di e en a ge species, hab-
i a s and geog aphic locali ies.
Why do he sil e aps ca ch mo e ish han he black
aps? One possible explana ion is ha he shiny appea -
ance o he sil e aps a ac s ish o some eason, o
ha ish caugh wi hin sil e aps escape (c . [18]) less
equen ly han ish caugh wi hin black aps. Ano he
possibili y is ha he da k and shadie appea ance o he
black aps epels ish. In ac , al hough he basic dimen-
sions o he wo ap ypes a e he same, he inyl coa -
ing o he black aps, in combina ion wi h hei
diamond shaped meshing, ende s he black aps mo e
“closed”and shady (Figu e 1). This migh in luence he
en y and/o e en ion a e o ish, and he eby also
ca chabili y. Di e ences in ca chabili y o squa e and
diamond shaped meshing ha e ea lie been epo ed in
he con ex o pelagic he ing (Clupea ha engus)
awling [19].
A ac ion by conspeci ics migh also play a ole in he
ma ked di e ence in he CPUE pe o mance be ween
ap ypes. I ish wi hin sil e aps a e mo e isible o
conspeci ic han ish in black aps, his migh inc ease
he ca chabili y o he sil e aps. Na u ally, he elec o-
chemical cha ac e is ics o he wo ap ypes a e also
likely o di e , bu he signi icance ha his migh bea
on ca ches emains o be in es iga ed. Wha e e he ea-
son o he di e ence, i is an undispu ed ac ha sil e
aps ou pe o m black aps in ca ching nine-spined
s icklebacks, and possibly, also many o he species o
ish.
We obse ed ha he CPUE o bo h ap ypes was
ma kedly di e en be ween he wo se s. This di e ence
can owe o a ious ac o s, including di e ences in ap-
ping loca ion, dep h, empe a u e and wea he condi-
ions among he wo se s. Also he sho e soak ime o
he i s as compa ed o second se migh explain he
highe CPUE in he i s se (c . [20]). Ye , in spi e o
hese di e ences, he ela i e pe o mance o he ap
ypes emained he same, sugges ing ha he ap ype
a he han o he ci cums ances may be mo e impo an
de e minan s o he CPUE. Howe e , as habi a com-
plexi y and p eda ion isk a e known o in luence min-
now ap ca ches [17], u he expe imen s in di e en
con ex s (e.g. in u bid wa e o unde p eda ion isk)
a e needed o e alua e whe he he esul s o his s udy
can be gene alized o o he con ex s oo.
I is well es ablished ha he e ogenei y in ishing
me hods and gea can c ea e he e ogenei y and e en bias
in s udies seeking o es ima e abundance o e en dis i-
bu ion o pa icula ish species (e.g. [4,5,12,13]). Ou
inding ha ap- ype can ha e a la ge impac on CPUE
o nine-spined s icklebacks adds o his e idence, and
has implica ions o s udies aiming o es ablish
Figu e 2 The numbe o ish caugh pe hou (CPUE) o nine-
spined s icklebacks caugh om deep (Se 1) and shallow (Se
2) si es wi h sil e - and black-colo ed aps. The ho izon al lines
connec ap-pai s. Black boxes indica e mean ± 95% Cl CPUE o
bo h se s. Each da a poin (ci cles) depic s CPUE in each ap (ji ed
o ease on in e p e a ion).
Me ilä e al. BMC Resea ch No es 2013, 6:151 Page 3 o 4
h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1756-0500/6/151
occu ence and abundance o ishes. Fo ins ance, e o s
ha e been unde aken o map he p esence o absence
o nine-spined s icklebacks in la ge numbe o small
lakes and ponds in Finland using oldable minnow aps
[16]. In mos cases p esence o he species could no be
es ablished, bu he su eys used ap ypes which we e
es ima ed o yield CPUEs in o de o 0.23 ish h
-1
in he
same pond as used in his s udy [16]. This alue co e-
sponds qui e well wi h he alue ob ained o “black”
aps in he p esen s udy (0.20), sugges ing ha he su -
eys migh ha e easily o e looked p esence o nine-
spined s icklebacks in low-densi y loca ions. Hence, o-
ge he wi h ea lie esul s, he esul s emphasize he
need o ca e ul selec ion and s anda diza ion o ishing
gea in bo h quan i a i e (i.e. abundance) and quali a i e
(i.e. dis ibu ion) s udies.
Conclusions
In p ac ical e ms, he esul s o his s udy deli e a
leas wo clea messages o esea che s wan ing o ca ch
s icklebacks. Fi s , he sil e aps a e likely o yield be -
e ca ches han he black aps. Second, i di e en
ypes o aps a e used, i will be impo an o con ol
o a ia ion in CPUE due o ap ype. In he u u e,
s udies ocusing on beha io al mechanisms unde lying
di e ences in ca chabili y by di e en ap ypes could
p o ide in e es ing insigh s on undamen al biological
ques ions abou ac o s in luencing animal decision
making.
Compe ing in e es s
The au ho s decla e ha hey ha e no compe ing in e es s.
Au ho s’con ibu ions
JM concei ed he s udy. JM, AE, H-KL ca ied ou he ield wo k. JM analyzed
he da a. JM, AE, H-KL all con ibu ed o w i ing he manusc ip . All au ho s
ead and app o ed he inal manusc ip .
Acknowledgemen s
We hank Ma i Sii onen o help wi h ieldwo k, Ma ika Lilja o logis ic
suppo , Jacquelin De Fa e i o commen s on ea lie e sion o his
manusc ip .
Au ho de ails
1
Ecological Gene ics Resea ch Uni , Depa men o Biosciences, Uni e si y o
Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
2
Depa men o En i onmen al Sciences,
Uni e si y o Helsinki, 15140, Lah i, Finland.
3
Depa men o Biological and
En i onmen al Sciences, Uni e si y o Jy äskylä, 40014, Jy äskylä, Finland.
Recei ed: 21 Feb ua y 2013 Accep ed: 10 Ap il 2013
Published: 16 Ap il 2013
Re e ences
1. Kidd K, Blanch ield PJ, Mills KH, Palace VP, E ans RE, Lazo chak JM, Flick RM:
Collapse o a ish popula ion a e exposu e o a syn he ic es ogen.
P oc Na l Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:8897–8901.
2. G yska AD, Hube a WA, Ge owb KG: Rela i e abundance and leng hs o
Kendall Wa m Sp ings Dace cap u ed om di e en habi a s in a
specially designed ap. T ans Am Fish Soc 1998, 127:309–315.
3. Guy CS, Willis DW, Schul z RD: Compa ison o ca ch pe uni e o and
size s uc u e o whi e c appies collec ed wi h ap ne s and gill ne s.
N Am J Fish Manage 1996, 16:947–951.
4. A a HH, Olmez M, Beckan S, Sece S: Compa ison o h ee di e en aps
o ca ching blue c ab (Calline es sapidus Re hbn 1896) in Beymelek
Lagoon. Tu kish J Ve Anim Sci 2002, 26:1145–1150.
5. Hanchin PA, Willis DA, Sau e b TR: Compa ison o concu en ap-ne and
gill-ne samples o Black Bullheads. J F eshw Ecol 2002, 17:233–237.
6. S o B: Some ac o s a ec ing he ca ching powe o unbai ed ish aps.
J Fish Biol 1970, 2:15–22.
7. Blaus ein L: E ec s o a ious ac o s on he e iciency o minnow aps
o sample mosqui o ish (Gambusia a inis) and g een sun ish (Lepomis
cyanellus) popula ions. J Am Mosq Con Assoc 1989, 5:29–35.
8. He X, Lodge DM: Using minnow aps o es ima e ish popula ion size:
he impo ance o spa ial dis ibu ion and ela i e species abundance.
Hyd obiologia 1990, 190:9–14.
9. Bigelow KA, Boggs CH, He X: En i onmen al e ec s on swo d ish and
blue sha k ca ch a es in he US No h Paci ic longline ishe y.
Fish Oceanog 1990, 8:178–198.
10. Lindquis DC, Shaw RF: E ec s o cu en speed and u bidi y on
s a iona y ligh - ap ca ches o la al and ju enile ishes. Fish Bull 2005,
103:438–444.
11. C oss TK, McIne y MC, Schupp DH: Seasonal a ia ion in ap-ne ca ches
o bluegill on Minneso a lakes. No h Am J Fish Manag 1995, 15:328–389.
12. Jackson DA, Ha ey HH: Quali a i e and quan i a i e sampling o lake ish
communi ies. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 1997, 54:2807–2813.
13. Layman CA, Smi h DE: Sampling bias o minnow aps in shallow aqua ic
habi a s on he eas e n sho e o Vi ginia. We lands 2001, 21:145–154.
14. Bell MA, Fos e S: The E olu iona y Biology o he Th eespine S ickleback.
Ox o d: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess; 1994.
15. Ös lund-Nilsson S, Maye I, Hun ing o d FA: Biology o he Th ee-spined
S ickleback. Boca Ra on: CRC P ess; 2007.
16. Me ilä J: Fac o s in luencing nine-spined s ickleback (Pungi ius pungi ius)
apping success. Ann Zool Fennici 2012, 49:350–354.
17. Dupuch A, Pa adis Y, Magnan P: Beha iou al esponses o p ey ishes o
habi a complexi y and p eda ion isk induce bias in minnow ap
ca ches. J Fish Biol 2011, 79:533–538.
18. Culp NE, Glozie JM: Expe imen al e alua ion o a minnow ap o small
lo ic ish. Hyd obiologia 1989, 175:83–87.
19. Suu onen P, Milla RB: Size selec i i y o diamond and squa e mesh
codends in pelagic he ing awls: Only small he ing will no ice he
di e ence. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 1992, 49:2104–2117.
20. Kneib RT, C aig AH: E icacy o minnow aps o sampling mummichogs
in idal ma shes. Es ua ies 2001, 24:884–893.
doi:10.1186/1756-0500-6-151
Ci e his a icle as: Me ilä e al.:La ge di e ences in ca ch pe uni o
e o be ween wo minnow ap models. BMC Resea ch No es 2013 6:151.
Submi you nex manusc ip o BioMed Cen al
and ake ull ad an age o :
• Con enien online submission
• Tho ough pee e iew
• No space cons ain s o colo figu e cha ges
• Immedia e publica ion on accep ance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Schola
• Resea ch which is eely a ailable o edis ibu ion
Submi you manusc ip a
www.biomedcen al.com/submi
Me ilä e al. BMC Resea ch No es 2013, 6:151 Page 4 o 4
h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1756-0500/6/151