scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Teaching practices mediating the effect of teachers’ psychological stress, and not physiological on their visual focus of attention

Read accessible full text

Teaching practices mediating the effect of teachers’ psychological stress, and not physiological on their visual focus of attention

Author: Chaudhuri, Saswati,Jõgi, Anna-Liisa,Pakarinen, Eija,Lerkkanen, Marja-Kristiina
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Year: 2023
Source: https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/123456789/92051/1/chaudhuriym.pdf
This is a sel -a chi ed e sion o an o iginal a icle. This e sion
may di e om he o iginal in pagina ion and ypog aphic de ails.
Au ho (s):
Ti le:
Yea :
Ve sion:
Copy igh :
Righ s:
Righ s u l:
Please ci e he o iginal e sion:
CC BY 4.0
h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
Teaching p ac ices media ing he e ec o eache s’ psychological s ess, and no
physiological on hei isual ocus o a en ion
© 2023 he Au ho s
Published e sion
Chaudhu i, Saswa i; Jõgi, Anna-Liisa; Paka inen, Eija; Le kkanen, Ma ja-K is iina
Chaudhu i, S., Jõgi, A.-L., Paka inen, E., & Le kkanen, M.-K. (2023). Teaching p ac ices media ing
he e ec o eache s’ psychological s ess, and no physiological on hei isual ocus o
a en ion. F on ie s in Educa ion, 8, A icle 1283701.
h ps://doi.o g/10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
2023
F on ie s in Educa ion 01 on ie sin.o g
Teaching p ac ices media ing he
e ec o eache s’ psychological
s ess, and no physiological on
hei isual ocus o a en ion
Saswa iChaudhu i
1
*, Anna-LiisaJõgi
2, EijaPaka inen
1,3 and
Ma ja-K is iinaLe kkanen
1
1 Depa men o Teache Educa ion, Uni e si y o Jy äskylä, Jy äskylä, Finland, 2 School o Educa ion,
Tallinn Uni e si y, Tallinn, Es onia, 3 No wegian Cen e o Lea ning En i onmen and Beha io al
Resea ch in Educa ion, Uni e si y o S a ange , S a ange , No way
The aim o he p esen s udy was o in es iga e he associa ion be ween eache s’
(N  =  53) physiological and psychological s ess and hei isual ocus o a en ion
as well as he media ing e ec o eaching p ac ices on his associa ion in
au hen ic class oom se ings. Da a we e collec ed using mul imodal me hods
o measu emen : sali a y co isol le els o physiological s ess, a sel - epo ed
ques ionnai e o psychological s ess, obse ed eaching p ac ices du ing one
school day, and eye- acking ideo eco dings o class oom eache s du ing one
lesson o eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion. The esul s showed ha nei he
eache s’ physiological no psychological s ess was di ec ly ela ed o hei
isual ocus o a en ion. Howe e , using mo e child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices
compa ed wi h eache -di ec ed ones was ela ed o a highe numbe o ixa ions
on s uden s, longe o al ixa ion du a ion, and mo e indi idualized dis ibu ion
o isual ocus o a en ion on s uden s. Teache ’s eaching p ac ices media ed
he e ec o eache s’ psychological s ess on hei ixa ion coun s on s uden s
and dis ibu ion o isual ocus o a en ion. The esul s sugges ha eaching
p ac ices a e ela ed o he isual a en ion eache s’ gi e o s uden s and ha
eache s’ s ess a ec s hei isual ocus o a en ion h ough eaching p ac ices.
The p ac ical implica ions o his s udy sugges ha eache s should ecei e
aining and suppo o ecognize hei s ess le el and i s associa ion wi h hei
eaching.
KEYWORDS
eache s ess, eaching p ac ices, eache isual ocus o a en ion, co isol,
eye- acking, G ade 1
1 In oduc ion
Teache s need o manage se e al unp edic able class oom si ua ions and he demands
a ising om hem du ing he school day. Acco dingly, eache s need o gi e immedia e isual
ocus o a en ion and in e ac wi h s uden s in ol ed in hese si ua ions o assess hei lea ning-
ela ed needs and beha io s. I has been epo ed ha eache s’ pe cep ions o hei wo k- ela ed
s ess a e linked o he way hey in e ac wi h s uden s. Fo ins ance, when eache s a e highly
s essed, hey end o o e less emo ional suppo o s uden s and show lowe quali y o
class oom o ganiza ion (Pen inen e al., 2020). They also gi e less indi idualized isual ocus
o a en ion o he s uden s (Chaudhu i e  al., 2022a). Fu he mo e, eache s who epo
OPEN ACCESS
EDITED BY
Ch is ian Kosel,
Technical Uni e si y o Munich, Ge many
REVIEWED BY
No a McIn y e,
Uni e si y o Sou hamp on, Uni edKingdom
And eas Gegen u ne ,
Uni e si y o Augsbu g, Ge many
Syl ia Gabel,
Uni e si y o Augsbu g, Augsbu g, in
collabo a ion wi h e iewe AG
*CORRESPONDENCE
Saswa i Chaudhu i
[email p o ec ed]
RECEIVED 26 Augus 2023
ACCEPTED 06 No embe 2023
PUBLISHED 22 No embe 2023
CITATION
Chaudhu i S, Jõgi A-L, Paka inen E and
Le kkanen M-K (2023) Teaching p ac ices
media ing he e ec o eache s’ psychological
s ess, and no physiological on hei isual
ocus o a en ion.
F on . Educ. 8:1283701.
doi: 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
COPYRIGHT
© 2023 Chaudhu i, Jõgi, Paka inen and
Le kkanen. This is an open-access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e
Commons A ibu ion License (CC BY). The
use, dis ibu ion o ep oduc ion in o he
o ums is pe mi ed, p o ided he o iginal
au ho (s) and he copy igh owne (s) a e
c edi ed and ha he o iginal publica ion in his
jou nal is ci ed, in acco dance wi h accep ed
academic p ac ice. No use, dis ibu ion o
ep oduc ion is pe mi ed which does no
comply wi h hese e ms.
TYPE O iginal Resea ch
PUBLISHED 22 No embe 2023
DOI 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
Chaudhu i e al. 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
F on ie s in Educa ion 02 on ie sin.o g
expe iencing less s ess end o gi e mo e a en ion o s uden s’
indi idual lea ning expe iences, espond mo e o s uden s’ needs, and
use less eac i e class oom managemen s a egies (Clunies-Ross e al.,
2008; Tu ne and Thielking, 2019).
Unp edic able si ua ions o en occu du ing eaching in au hen ic
class oom se ings and i migh bedemanding o eache s o gi e
immedia e isual ocus o a en ion o s uden s in o de o no ice
ele an in o ma ion and moni o momen - o-momen changes in
s uden s’ lea ning- ela ed beha io s (Van den Boge e al., 2014).
Acco dingly, eache s need o adjus hei eaching p ac ices and
p o ide adap i e pedagogical suppo based on he needs o hei
s uden s (Seidel e al., 2021). Howe e , wea e a om unde s anding
how eache s’ s ess is ela ed o hei eaching p ac ices and class oom
beha io owa d s uden s. P e iously, labo a o y-based s udies ha e
shown ha ela ionships exis be ween s ess and cogni ion, and isual
gaze beha io and s ess. Fo ins ance, Buchanan e al. (2006), a gued
ha physiological s ess can nega i ely in luence cogni ion in e ms o
memo y esponses in a wo d ecall es . In addi ion, Va heue e al.
(2021) a gued ha an indi idual ypically shows isual gaze a oidance
du ing a s ong co isol esponse in socially s ess ul si ua ions. The
esea che s o he men ioned s udy ha e wa an ed he use o
eye- acking o de ec he e ec s o s ess on social
in e ac ion si ua ions.
Simila ly, eaching in ol es social in e ac ions be ween eache s
and s uden s whe eby he eache mus encou age s uden ’s
pa icipa ion, manage challenging s uden beha io s, and moni o
academic de elopmen s among o he social ac i i ies in au hen ic
class oom se ings. P e ious esea ch has shown ha eache s’ high
wo k- ela ed s ess is associa ed wi h less indi idualized isual ocus
o a en ion on s uden s in au hen ic class oom se ings (Chaudhu i
e al., 2022a). In addi ion, Jŏgi e al. (2023a) showed ha he e we e
no ela ionships be ween physiological s ess and posi i e a ec in
au hen ic class oom se ings. Howe e , eache s’ sel -e icacy belie s
we e ela ed o lowe s ess and highe posi i e a ec in he middle o
he school day. Fu he mo e, Jõgi e al. (2023b) showed ha eache s’
physiological s ess did no ha e an e ec on eache s’ eaching
p ac ices o s uden ’s lea ning ou comes. Howe e , Jõgi e al. (2023b)
a gued ha eache s wi h lowe sel - epo ed s ess used ela i ely
mo e child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices han eache -di ec ed ones.
The p esen s udy is di e en om he p e iously conduc ed s udies
as wea e in es iga ing how eache s’ psychological (sel - epo ed) and
physiological (co isol le els) s ess in he class oom a e ela ed o
eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion in au hen ic class oom se ings and
whe he eache ’s eaching p ac ices media e his associa ion.
1.1 Teache s’ s ess
Teaching is a s ess ul occupa ion due o high p essu e and many
demands, no el asks, and ecu ing p oblems which need o besol ed
in he class oom (Johnson e  al., 2005; B ough on, 2010). Many
eache s expe ience he eeling ha hey do no ha e enough ime and
esou ces o do hei wo k he way hey wan o (Aulén e al., 2021).
In addi ion, dis up i e s uden beha io s (Clunies-Ross e al., 2008)
o less suppo i e leade ship cause s ain in he eaching en i onmen
(Skaal ik and Skaal ik, 2009). The e o e, eache s ypically epo
highe le els o s ess han many o he p o essionals (Aloe e al., 2014;
He man e al., 2020). S ess is ha m ul, as highe s ess is linked o
g ea e bu nou (e.g., Poge e e  al., 2019) and highe u no e
in en ions among eache s (Skaal ik and Skaal ik, 2011; Madigan and
Kim, 2021). Fu he mo e, s essed eache s also use ewe child-
cen e ed eaching p ac ices in he class oom (Jõgi e al., 2023b) and
ha e poo e ela ionships wi h hei s uden s (Ald up e al., 2018).
Howe e , less is known abou how eache s ess and eaching
p ac ices a e associa ed wi h hei isual ocus o a en ion
while eaching.
Teache s ess can be ca ego ized as a subjec i e expe ience
(psychological s ess) o a physiological s ess. The la e can
beobjec i ely assessed while he o me , which is o en based on sel -
a ings, is a subjec i e e alua ion o challenges in he eaching
en i onmen and an indi idual’s abili ies o cope wi h hese (Schlo z,
2019; Becke e al., 2022). In he p esen s udy, eache s’ physiological
s ess was measu ed by sali a y co isol, he mos sui able way o
collec co isol samples non-in asi ely in ambula o y se ings.
Co isol is eleased in he body h ough he hypo halamic–pi ui a y–
ad enal axis when a pe son ge s in o a s ess ul si ua ion and he
sympa he ic ne ous sys em is ac i a ed (Kudielka e al., 2012). Highe
day ime co isol le els a e cha ac e is ic o people unde ch onic s ess
(Mille e al., 2007) and can bea isk ac o o se e al psychological
and physiological mal unc ions, o example, inc eased anxie y o
supp ession o he immune sys em (Ch ousus, 2009). Recen esea ch
esul s sugges ha sel - epo ed s ess and physiological s ess a e wo
di e en ace s o s ess ha migh no beco ela ed (Ka z e al., 2016;
Becke e al., 2022). The e o e, in he cu en s udy, bo h indica o s o
s ess we e in es iga ed o ob ain a mo e comple e pic u e o eache s’
s ess- ela ed expe iences a wo k—including bo h he physiological
and psychological measu es o s ess.
1.2 Teaching p ac ices
The de elopmen o p ima y school s uden s’ academic skills and
mo i a ion depend on p ac ices hei eache s choose o use
(Le kkanen e al., 2012, 2016; Kikas e al., 2018; Paka inen and Kikas,
2019; Tang e al., 2022). Teache s di e in e ms o he eaching
p ac ices hey deploy in he class oom (Le kkanen e al., 2016; Tang
e al., 2017; Kikas e al., 2018). A common heo e ical amewo k o
s udying eaching p ac ices is ea ing hem as child-cen e ed and
eache -di ec ed ones, which ha e oo s in cons uc i ism and
beha io ism, espec i ely (Daniels and Shumow, 2003; S ipek and
Byle , 2004). Child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices emphasize child en’s
ac i e pa icipa ion, add essing child en’s needs, in e es s, and
ini ia i es, and eache ’s ac i e sca olding o child en’s lea ning.
Teache s using eache -di ec ed p ac ices ypically gi e he same
ins uc ion and asks o all s uden s and emphasize co ec answe s
a he han he lea ning p ocess (S ipek and Byle , 2004). In p ac ice,
mos eache s employ bo h child-cen e ed and eache -di ec ed
p ac ices depending on he goal o lea ning ask, bu eache s di e in
he a io o using one o ano he (Daniels and Shumow, 2003).
Subsequen ly, du ing eaching, eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion
owa d s uden s in he class oom can a y based on s uden - ela ed
ac o s such s uden s’ basic academic skills, indi idual suppo o
s uden s in basic academic skills, and s uden s’ beha io owa d he
eache (Goldbe g e al., 2021; Chaudhu i e al., 2022b). Al hough
se e al s udies ha e examined he ole o eaching p ac ices in s uden
ou comes, less is known how eaching p ac ices a e associa ed wi h
Chaudhu i e al. 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
F on ie s in Educa ion 03 on ie sin.o g
eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion while eaching. I is no ewo hy ha
al hough bo h eaching p ac ices and eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion
a e measu ed om au hen ic class oom se ings, ye , hey a e wo
di e en cons uc s. Teaching p ac ices measu e he a io o child-
cen e ed e sus eache -di ec ed p ac ices based on he lea ning ask
whe eas eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion measu es eache s’
class oom beha io in e ms o du a ion o isual gaze owa d s uden s
du ing eaching.
1.3 Teache isual ocus o a en ion
Teache isual ocus o a en ion has been de ined as he eache ’s
gaze on ele an a ge s in he class oom, such as s uden s, o p ocess
in o ma ion ela ed o hei lea ning and beha io du ing eaching in
au hen ic class oom se ings ( an den Boge e  al., 2014). The
class oom is an in o ma ion-dense en i onmen in which mul iple
un o eseen si ua ions a ise ha equi e he eache ’s immedia e isual
a en ion. Despi e he un o eseen demands in he class oom
en i onmen , eache s need o no ice s uden s in o de o assess hei
lea ning- ela ed beha io s and adjus hei ins uc ion acco dingly
(Ja odzka e al., 2021).
P e ious esea ch has shown ha all s uden s in a class oom
ecei e he eache ’s isual a en ion; howe e , he amoun o i a ies
(Dessus e al., 2016). The e a e many s uden - ela ed ac o s, such as
academic skill le els and class oom beha io , ha can de e mine he
amoun o eache isual ocus o a en ion owa d s uden s. Fo
ins ance, eache s di ec a longe isual ocus o a en ion o s uden s
wi h poo basic academic skill le els in o de o p o ide mo e
indi idual and adap i e pedagogical suppo o he s uden s (Seidel
e al., 2021; Chaudhu i e al., 2022b). Fu he mo e, eache s di ec
longe isual ocus o a en ion o s uden s showing mo e in e ac i e,
dis up i e, and o - ask beha io du ing a lesson (Yamamo o and
Imai-Ma sumu a, 2013; Goldbe g e al., 2021; Shinoda e al., 2021). In
addi ion, eache - ela ed ac o s, such as pe cei ed s ess a wo k, can
a ec hei isual ocus o a en ion in he class oom. Fo example,
highe eache s’ s ess in e ms o hei pe cei ed inadequacy is
associa ed wi h less indi idualized isual ocus o a en ion on
s uden s in he class oom (Chaudhu i e al., 2022a). In summa y, he e
is e idence ha eache s’ pe cep ion o s ess can be ela ed o hei
class oom beha io in e ms o isual ocus o a en ion on s uden s.
Howe e , li le is known abou he way eache s’ physiological and
psychological s ess a e ela ed o eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion
h ough hei eaching p ac ices.
1.4 Aim o he s udy
We expand on he p e ious indings by add essing h ee impo an
issues. Fi s , wea e a om unde s anding how eache s’ physiological
and psychological s esses a e ela ed o he way hey alloca e hei
isual ocus o a en ion in he class oom. Second, he ole ha
eaching p ac ices play in eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion has been
less in es iga ed. Thi d, i is unclea whe he eaching p ac ices
media e he associa ion be ween eache s’ s ess and isual ocus o
a en ion. Weused mul imodal da a collec ion me hods o inc ease
he ecological alidi y s ongly ecommended in eache s’ well-being
esea ch (F ancis e  al., 2017; Hasche and Wabe , 2021). Ou
heo e ical model is p esen ed in Figu e1, and ou speci ic esea ch
ques ions (RQ) and hypo heses (H) a e he ollowing:
RQ1: To wha ex en a e eache s’ physiological and psychological
s esses ela ed o hei isual ocus o a en ion in he class oom?
H1: We expec ed ha highe physiological and psychological
s ess would be ela ed o less indi idualized dis ibu ion o isual
ocus o a en ion and ewe a en ion ixa ions on s uden s
(Chaudhu i e al., 2022a).
RQ2: To wha ex en a e eache s’ eaching p ac ices ela ed o
hei isual ocus o a en ion in he class oom?
H2: We expec ed ha using mo e child-cen e ed p ac ices
compa ed wi h eache -di ec ed ones is ela ed o mo e
indi idualized dis ibu ion o isual ocus o a en ion and mo e
ixa ions on s uden s (Goldbe g e al., 2021; Seidel e al., 2021).
RQ3: Do eaching p ac ices media e he e ec o eache s’ s ess
on hei isual ocus o a en ion?
H3: We expec ed ha eache s’ highe physiological and
psychological s ess would be ela ed o hei isual ocus o
a en ion in he class oom h ough employing less child-cen e ed
eaching p ac ices compa ed wi h eache -di ec ed ones
(Chaudhu i e al., 2022a; Jõgi e al., 2023b).
2 Me hods
2.1 Pa icipan s
In he p esen s udy, 53 eache s (3 males) eaching G ade 1 om
31 schools and se en municipali ies o Cen al Finland loca ed in bo h
u al and u ban a eas pa icipa ed. The eache s epo ed hei wo k
expe ience in yea s (M
exp
= 16.07, SD = 9.43, Min
exp
= 0.5, Max
exp
= 39)
and hei class size (M
cs
= 19.3, SD = 4.34, Min
cs
= 7, Max
cs
= 25). The
da a used in he s udy we e pa o a la ge p ojec ha ocused on he
ole o eache and s uden s ess on eache –s uden in e ac ions in
FIGURE1
Theo e ical model hypo hesized in he s udy.
Chaudhu i e al. 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
F on ie s in Educa ion 04 on ie sin.o g
he class oom (Le kkanen and Paka inen, 2021). The s udy was
app o ed by he uni e si y e hics commi ee be o e he da a collec ion
began, and i was de e mined o bein line wi h he Finnish Na ional
Boa d on Resea ch In eg i y (TENK, 2012). Teache s we e in o med
ha pa icipa ion in he s udy was olun a y. Teache s, as well as hei
s uden s’ pa en s, ga e w i en consen o hei pa icipa ion p io o
da a collec ion.
2.2 Measu es
2.2.1 Teache s’ physiological s ess
We used sali a co isol as eache s’ physiological s ess indica o .
Teache s we e asked o gi e six sali a samples du ing wo wo king
days: a awakening, 30 and 45 min a e awakening, a 10:00 a.m., a
he end o he school day a app oxima ely 12:00–1:00 p.m., and be o e
bed ime. Sali e e® Co isol swabs (Sa s ed , Nümb ech , Ge many)
we e used o collec ing sali a samples. Samples we e assayed by
Co isol Luminescence Immunoassay (CLIA RE62011; IBL
In e na ional Co p.) in D esden LabSe ice GmbH, Ge many.
Acco ding o ou p o ocol, a co isol sample was excluded i he
eache had ea en wi hin 30 min be o e sampling o had been ill on he
sampling day. Wealso excluded co isol samples wi h concen a ions
la ge han 73 nmoL/L as physiologically implausible (Mille
e al., 2013).
In he cu en s udy, weused samples om wo ime poin s du ing
o a e he lessons, a 10:00 a.m. and a app oxima ely 12:00–1:00 p.m.
Fo bo h samples, co isol le els om wo sampling days we e
a e aged (Wol e al., 2008; Massey e al., 2016). Highe co isol le els
ha e been in e p e ed as indica ing highe physiological s ess (Mille
e al., 2007; Be y e al., 2014).
2.2.2 Teache s’ psychological s ess
An adap ed e sion o Ge is’s Pa en al S ess In en o y (Ge is
e al., 1993; Paka inen e al., 2010) was used o measu e eache s’
eaching- ela ed psychological s ess. The sel - epo ed ques ionnai e
consis ed o h ee i ems abou eaching- ela ed s ess (e.g., “I ha e a
lo mo e p oblems in guiding he child en han Iexpec ed.”; “I o en
eel guil y o inadequa e when hinking abou wha kind o eache
Iam.” and “I some imes eel ha guiding child en is an o e whelming
ask o me.”; C onbach’s alpha = 0.76.) which we e a ed on a 5-poin
Like scale (1 = “Does no apply o me a all” and 5 = “Applies o me
e y well”). The a e age sco e o he h ee i ems was calcula ed and
used as a psychological s ess indica o .
2.2.3 Teache s’ eaching p ac ices
Teaching p ac ices we e measu ed using he Ea ly Childhood
Class oom Obse a ion Measu e (ECCOM; S ipek and Byle , 2004;
Tang e al., 2017). Teache s employing child-cen e ed and eache -
di ec ed p ac ices in hei class ooms we e a ed by ained esea ch
assis an s om h ee ideo- eco ded lessons o 45 min om one
school day. The dimensions o eaching p ac ices we e assessed based
on h ee subscales: class oom managemen (4 i ems), class oom
clima e (4 i ems), and ins uc ion (7 i ems), a ed on a 5-poin scale
(see Appendix 1 o able showing desc ip ion o subscales). The scale
poin s on each o hese i ems show he pe cen age o ins uc ional
ime eache used child-cen e ed o eache -di ec ed eaching
p ac ices (1 = ‘0–20%’ o ime, 5 = ‘81–100%’ o ime). The mean o all
i ems om all he h ee sub-scales we e used o es ima e child-
cen e ed and eache -di ec ed p ac ices (see also Tang e al., 2017).
P e ious esea ch has shown ha eache s employ child-cen e ed and
eache -di ec ed p ac ices du ing eaching, howe e , one o hese
p ac ices a e ypically domina ing (Daniels and Shumow, 2003; S ipek
and Byle , 2004). Since child-cen e ed and eache -di ec ed p ac ices
o en show s ong nega i e co ela ion such as = −0.89in he p esen
s udy sample, hese dimensions canno be added as indi idual
obse ed a iables in he same s a is ical model due o
mul icollinea i y. Acco dingly, in he p esen s udy, he a io o child-
cen e ed o eache -di ec ed p ac ices was used in he analysis (see
also Le kkanen e al., 2012; Roubino e al., 2020). A a io sco e mo e
han 1 indica ed ha he eache implemen ed mo e child-cen e ed
p ac ices whe eas a a io sco e o less han one mean ha he eache
implemen ed mo e eache -di ec ed p ac ices du ing eaching
(Roubino e al., 2020; Jõgi e al., 2023b). The in e - a e eliabili y was
assessed based on 11 obse a ions ha we e obse ed by wo
obse e s. The e was good ag eemen be ween obse e s (in aclass
co ela ion coe icien ICC[1] = 0.88 o child-cen e ed p ac ices and
ICC[1] = 0.79 o eache -di ec ed p ac ices). Fo u he analyses, one
ou o he wo obse a ions was andomly chosen o each eache .
The mean o all i ems om all he h ee sub-scales we e used o
es ima e child-cen e ed and eache -di ec ed p ac ices (Tang
e al., 2017).
2.2.4 Teache s’ isual ocus o a en ion
Teache s’ isual ocus o a en ion was measu ed using mobile
eye- acking echnology. Teache s wo e Tobii P o Glasses 2 (Tobii
AB, Dande yd, Sweden) o 20–25 min om he beginning o he
second lesson o a no mal school day. The au hen ic class oom
se ing du ing he eye- acking ideo eco ding was ensu ed by
gi ing he eache s eedom o conduc he lesson he way hey
wan ed. The eache s’ eye- acking ideos we e eco ded du ing 20
li e acy lessons, 26 ma h lessons, and ou ac i i y-based lessons.
Fu he mo e, wo ained esea ch assis an s calib a ed he
eye- acking glasses using a one-poin calib a ion be o e eco ding
he eye- acking ideos. The ea e , o ensu e good da a quali y, he
calib a ion was echecked and alida ed by asking he eache o
look a h ee poin s on he wall. Only a e success ul calib a ion did
he esea ch assis an s s a he eye- acking eco ding. A e he
eye- acking ideos we e eco ded, he ixa ions we e il e ed om
he ideo eco dings using he I-VT A en ion il e se ing o he
Tobii P o Lab .1.128 analysis so wa e. The I-VT A en ion il e
was bes sui ed o iden i ying ixa ion me ics, as he pa icipan ’s
physical mo emen s we e no es ic ed while eco ding he
eye- acking ideos. Each eache ’s isual ocus o a en ion was
de e mined based on hei a eas o in e es (AOIs) in he class oom.
The AOIs we e de ined as he a ge s ha he eache looked a in
he eye- acking ideos, such as s uden s, ins uc ional ma e ials
(such as hose ela ed o eaching and lea ning), and
non-ins uc ional ma e ials (such as walls, cu ains, ables, chai s,
e c.). AOI codes ha e been p e iously de e mined and used in p io
esea ch (see Chaudhu i e  al., 2022a,b). Fu he mo e, ained
esea ch assis an s mapped ixa ions on he AOIs iden i ied om
eye- acking ideo eco dings using he Tobii P o Lab .1.128
so wa e, based on whe e he eache ocused hei isual a en ion.
Fo example, eache s’ gaze on an indi idual s uden was shown by
a ed ci cle on he ideo; hen, he esea ch assis an manually

Chaudhu i e al. 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
F on ie s in Educa ion 05 on ie sin.o g
mapped he gaze on he espec i e s uden ’s pic u e and iden i ied
i as he eache ’s AOI.
To ensu e in e code eliabili y, double coding was done wi h 20%
o he ideos om he whole da ase , which p o ided a double coding
ag eemen a e age o 90.09%. Once he eye- acking ideo eco dings
we e coded, u he analysis was conduc ed using he eache s’ isual
ocus o a en ion in e ms o he eache s’ o al ixa ion du a ion on
s uden s and ixa ion coun s on s uden s. Fu he mo e, o ensu e good
quali y da a, eye- acking ideo eco dings wi h a gaze sample
pe cen age o 70% and abo e we e selec ed. The gaze sample
pe cen age is de ined as he o al pe cen age o he eco ding du a ion
when one o bo h eyes a e de ec ed by mobile eye- acking glasses.
Acco dingly, h ee ideos om he p esen da ase had o beexcluded
due o a gaze sample pe cen age lowe han 70%. The alues o o al
ixa ion du a ion g ea e han 3 SD we e excluded om he u he
analyses as ou lie s (n = 2).
2.3 P ocedu e
These ques ionnai es we e gi en o he eache s on he same day
hey we e ins uc ed abou he sali a y co isol sampling. The eache s
illed ou he ques ionnai es in hei p e e ed ime. Teaching p ac ices
we e ideo- eco ded on he i s sali a y co isol sampling day by
ained esea ch assis an s. Typically, on he same day as he ideo
eco ding, he eye- acking ideos we e eco ded du ing he second
lesson o he school day.
2.4 Analysis s a egy
In he p esen s udy, ixa ion was de ined as he ime when he
eye was ela i ely s ill and ook inpu om he en i onmen o
in o ma ion p ocessing (Holmq is e  al., 2015). Acco dingly,
eache s’ ixa ion me ics, such as o al ixa ion du a ions and
ixa ion coun s, we e conside ed as indica o s o eache s’ isual
ocus o a en ion and used o u he analysis. Teache s’ o al
ixa ion du a ion can bede ined as he du a ion o ime du ing eye
acking when he eye is ela i ely s ill and p o ides he abili y o
p ocess in o ma ion om he a ge s in he class oom en i onmen
( an den Boge e al., 2014; McIn y e e al., 2017; Goldbe g e al.,
2021; Seidel e al., 2021). Addi ionally, ixa ion coun s can bede ined
as he o al numbe o imes ixa ions occu in an AOI (such as
s uden s) in a gi en ime pe iod du ing an eye- acking eco ding
(Holmq is e  al., 2015). Nex , in o de o es ima e eache s’
dis ibu ion o isual a en ion among s uden s, eache s’ o al
ixa ion du a ion on s uden s was used o calcula e he Gini
coe icien using he Gini package in R (Zhicheng e al., 2021). The
Gini coe icien anged om 0 o 1, whe ein 0 e e ed o an equally
dis ibu ed isual ocus o a en ion on all s uden s and 1 e e ed o
an unequal dis ibu ion, whe ein only one s uden ecei ed all he
isual ocus o a en ion (Co ina e al., 2015). In he class oom
con ex , high eache s’ o al ixa ion du a ion and ixa ion coun s on
a s uden ypically indica e ha he eache is p ocessing in o ma ion
ela ed o s uden cha ac e is ics (Seidel e al., 2021). Acco ding o
Co ina e al. (2015), he high numbe o ixa ion coun s on a s uden
can ypically occu when a eache engages in p o iding eedback o
an indi idual s uden .
Desc ip i e s a is ics and bi a ia e co ela ions we e es ima ed
using IBM SPSS 28.0 (IBM, A monk, NY, USA). Pa h analyses wi h
media ion we e modeled using MPlus 8.8 (Mu hén and Mu hén,
1998–2022). Missing da a was managed h ough a ull in o ma ion
maximum likelihood (FIML) p ocedu e ha allows he inclusion o
all a ailable da a in o he model es ima ion.
In o al, weconduc ed nine pa h analyses wi h eg ession. Fo
each o h ee dependen a iables o isual ocus o a en ion (Gini
coe icien , o al ixa ion du a ion, ixa ion coun s), we es ed h ee
pa h models wi h each o h ee s ess indica o s (psychological s ess,
co isol a 10:00 a.m., co isol a 12:00–1:00 p.m.) and eaching
p ac ices as independen a iables. In all nine models, he di ec pa hs
om s ess and eaching p ac ices o he isual ocus o a en ion
indica o we e es ima ed, and he indi ec pa h om s ess h ough
eaching p ac ices o a en ion was modeled. All nine models we e
iden i ied wi h ze o deg ees o eedom and a pe ec i (Rayko
e al., 2013).
3 Resul s
3.1 Bi a ia e associa ions be ween
eache s’ psychological and physiological
s ess, eaching p ac ices, and isual ocus
o a en ion
The desc ip i e s a is ics o he s udy a iables a e indica ed in
Table1. The bi a ia e co ela ions a e shown in Table2. The highe
sali a y co isol le els o eache s a 10:00 a.m. we e ela ed o hei
highe co isol le els a 12:00–1:00 p.m. All h ee isual ocus o
a en ion indica o s also co ela ed in he expec ed di ec ions. A
highe Gini coe icien was ela ed o sho e o al ixa ion du a ion
TABLE1 Desc ip i e s a is ics o s ess, eaching p ac ices, and isual
ocus o a en ion.
Indica o N M SD Min Max
Psychological
s ess
52 2.16 0.74 1.00 4.00
Physiological s ess
Co isol a
10:00 a.m.
(nmol/l)a
53 2.29 0.55 1.20 4.24
Co isol a
12:00–1:00 p.m.
(nmol/l)a
53 2.15 0.45 1.10 3.48
Teaching
p ac icesb
53 1.33 0.76 0.30 3.70
Visual ocus o a en ion
Gini
coe icien c
49 0.51 0.11 0.29 0.76
To al ixa ion
du a ion (ms)
48 24,935.09 8,117.45 10,629.19 45,437.40
Fixa ion coun s 50 61.65 23.57 27.64 134.00
aCo isol concen a ions a e na u al loga i hm ans o med and agg ega ed o e wo
sampling days. bRa io o child-cen e ed p ac ices o eache -di ec ed ones. cDis ibu ion o
eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion.
Chaudhu i e al. 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
F on ie s in Educa ion 06 on ie sin.o g
and lesse ixa ion coun s. A longe ixa ion du a ion was ela ed o
mo e ixa ion coun s. Howe e , no associa ions we e ound be ween
eache s’ psychological and physiological s ess and eache s’ isual
ocus o a en ion indica o s.
Teache s’ p ac ices we e ela ed o hei psychological s ess, as
eache s epo ing lowe s ess used mo e child-cen e ed p ac ices in
he class oom compa ed wi h eache -di ec ed ones. Teaching
p ac ices we e no co ela ed wi h isual ocus o a en ion indica o s
(Table2).
3.2 Teaching p ac ices media ing he
associa ion be ween eache s’
psychological s ess and isual ocus o
a en ion
Nex , we es ed nine sepa a e eg ession models, in each o which
one o h ee s ess indica o s explained one o h ee isual ocus o
a en ion indica o s h ough eache s’ eaching p ac ices (see
Tables 3–5). We ound ha nei he eache s’ psychological no
physiological s ess was di ec ly ela ed o he eache s’ isual ocus o
a en ion, excep in one case. The highe he eache s’ co isol le el in
he middle o he school day, he less a en ion hey paid o s uden s
in he class oom (β = −0.16, p = 0.029; see Table3). The e was a di ec
e ec o eaching p ac ices on he Gini coe icien (dis ibu ion o
eache isual ocus o a en ion) and ixa ion coun s. Teache s’ use o
mo e child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices compa ed wi h eache -
di ec ed ones was ela ed o he mo e indi idualized dis ibu ion o
isual ocus o a en ion (β-s = −0.33 … –0.36, p = 0.001 … 0.007) and
a g ea e numbe o ixa ions o ixa ion coun s on indi idual s uden s
(β-s = 0.39 … 0.46, p < 0.001; see Tables 3–5).
We also es ed he indi ec e ec o eache s’ s ess on isual ocus
o a en ion h ough hei eaching p ac ices. We ound an indi ec
e ec o eache ’s psychological s ess on eache s’ isual ocus o
a en ion h ough hei p ac ices (see Table5). Teaching p ac ices
media e he associa ion be ween eache s’ psychological s ess and
hei dis ibu ion o isual a en ion (β = 0.16, p = 0.034) and numbe
o ixa ions (β = −0.21, p = 0.009). Howe e , he e we e no indi ec
e ec s o eache s’ physiological s ess on eache s’ isual ocus o
a en ion (see Tables 3, 4).
TABLE2 Bi a ia e co ela ions be ween used indica o s.
Indica o 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Psychological s ess –
Physiological s ess
2. Co isol a 10:00 a.m. (nmol/
l)a
–0.01 –
3. Co isol a 12:00–1:00 p.m.
(nmol/l) a
0.13 0.52*** –
4. Teaching p ac icesb–0.43** –0.05 –0.02 –
Visual ocus o a en ion
5. Gini coe icien c
0.12 0.15 –0.06 0.12 –
6. To al ixa ion du a ion –0.11 –0.20 0.03 –0.11 –0.57*** –
7. Fixa ion coun s –0.13 –0.13 –0.06 –0.13 –0.48*** 0.60***
aCo isol concen a ions a e na u al loga i hm ans o med and agg ega ed o e wo sampling days. bRa io o child-cen e ed p ac ices o eache -di ec ed ones. cDis ibu ion o eache s’ isual
ocus o a en ion. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
TABLE3 Reg ession model showing di ec and indi ec e ec s wi h a iables such as co isol a 10:00  am, isual ocus o a en ion, and eaching
p ac ices.
Visual ocus o a en ion indica o
Gini coe icien c R2  =  0.12 To al ixa ion du a ion
R2  =  0.06
Fixa ion coun s R2  =  0.16
βpβpβp
Di ec e ec s on isual ocus o a en ion
Co isol a 10:00 a.m.a0.10 0.282 −0.16 0.029 −0.09 0.329
Teaching p ac icesb−0.33 0.001 0.18 0.212 0.39 <0.001
Di ec e ec o co isol on
Teaching p ac icesb
−0.04 0.713 −0.04 0.713 −0.04 0.710
Indi ec e ec o co isol a
10:00 a.m. h ough Teaching
p ac ices
0.01 0.724 −0.01 0.735 −0.02 0.719
β, s anda dized eg ession coe icien . p, alue o p. aCo isol concen a ions a e na u al loga i hm ans o med and agg ega ed o e wo sampling days. bTeaching p ac ices- a io child-cen e ed
eaching p ac ices (CC) compa ed wi h eache -di ec ed p ac ices (TD). cDis ibu ion o eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion. Values in bold a e signi ican .
Chaudhu i e al. 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
F on ie s in Educa ion 07 on ie sin.o g
4 Discussion
The aim o he p esen s udy was o in es iga e whe he eache s’
physiological s ess, psychological s ess, and eaching p ac ices a e
associa ed wi h eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion and whe he
eache s’ eaching p ac ices media e he e ec o eache s’ s ess on
hei isual ocus o a en ion. The esul s indica ed ha eache s’ use
o mo e child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices compa ed wi h eache -
di ec ed ones was ela ed o mo e indi idualized dis ibu ion o isual
ocus o a en ion and a g ea e numbe o ixa ions on s uden s while
eaching. In addi ion, he eache ’s co isol le els a 10:00 a.m. had a
small, di ec nega i e e ec on he amoun o o al ixa ion du a ion
on s uden s. Fu he mo e, he e was an indi ec e ec o eache s’
psychological s ess on eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion h ough hei
eaching p ac ices.
Fi s , he associa ion be ween eache s’ physiological and
psychological s ess and i s ela ionship wi h eache s’ isual ocus o
a en ion we e in es iga ed. The esul s showed ha mos o he measu es
o eache s’ s ess we e no associa ed wi h he eache s’ isual ocus o
a en ion. In his ega d, ou esul s do no suppo he hypo hesis
expec ing ha highe physiological and psychological s ess is ela ed o
less indi idualized dis ibu ion o isual ocus o a en ion and ewe
ixa ions on s uden s. This issue needs u he in es iga ion.
Second, he associa ion be ween eache s’ eaching p ac ices and
hei isual ocus o a en ion was in es iga ed. The esul s showed ha
he mo e eache s used child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices compa ed
wi h eache -di ec ed ones, he mo e hey indi idualized he
dis ibu ion o isual ocus o a en ion among s uden s and he
g ea e he numbe o ixa ions on s uden s. Teache s using child-
cen e ed eaching p ac ices emphasize child en’s ac i e pa icipa ion,
add ess hei needs, in e es s, and ini ia i es, and ac i ely sca old hei
lea ning. In his ega d, s uden - ela ed ac o s in he class oom play
an impo an ole in guiding eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion du ing
child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices. Fo ins ance, eache s gi e longe
du a ions o isual ocus o a en ion o s uden s showing dis up i e
o in e ac i e beha io (Goldbe g e al., 2021), inc eased hand- aising
beha io o pa icipa e in discussions (Kosel e al., 2023), and poo
pe o mance in basic academic skills (Chaudhu i e  al., 2022b).
The e o e, ou esul s suppo ed he hypo hesis expec ing ha
eache s using mo e child-cen e ed p ac ices compa ed wi h eache -
di ec ed ones is ela ed o mo e indi idualized dis ibu ion o isual
ocus o a en ion and mo e ixa ions on s uden s.
TABLE5 Reg ession model showing di ec and indi ec e ec s wi h a iables such as psychological s ess, isual ocus o a en ion, and eaching
p ac ices.
Visual ocus o a en ion indica o
Gini coe icien b
R2  =  0.12
To al ixa ion du a ion
R2  =  0.04
Fixa ion coun s
R2  =  0.17
βpβpβp
Di ec e ec s on ocus o a en ion
Psychological s ess −0.05 0.745 −0.01 0.988 0.13 0.320
Teaching p ac icesa−0.36 0.007 0.20 0.193 0.46 <0.001
Di ec e ec o s ess on Teaching
p ac icesa
−0.45 <0.001 −0.45 <0.001 −0.45 <0.001
Indi ec e ec o psychological
s ess h ough Teaching p ac ices
0.16 0.034 −0.09 0.236 −0.21 0.009
β, s anda dized eg ession coe icien . p, alue o p. aRa io o child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices compa ed wi h eache -di ec ed p ac ices. bDis ibu ion o eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion.
Values in bold a e signi ican .
TABLE4 Reg ession model showing di ec and indi ec e ec s wi h a iables such as co isol a 12:00–1:00 p.m., isual ocus o a en ion, and
eaching p ac ices.
Visual ocus o a en ion indica o
Gini coe icien c
R2  =  0.12
To al ixa ion du a ion
R2  =  0.04
Fixa ion coun s
R2  =  0.15
βpβpβp
Di ec e ec s on ocus o a en ion
Co isol a 12:00–1:00 p.m.a−0.08 0.555 0.03 0.793 0.00 0.997
Teaching p ac icesb−0.34 0.001 0.19 0.197 0.39 <0.001
Di ec e ec o co isol on
Teaching p ac icesb
−0.05 0.727 −0.05 0.727 −0.05 0.727
Indi ec e ec o co isol a
12:00–1:00 p.m. h ough
Teaching p ac ices
−0.02 0.730 −0.01 0.716 −0.02 0.722
β, s anda dized eg ession coe icien . p, alue o p. aCo isol concen a ions a e na u al loga i hm ans o med and agg ega ed o e wo sampling days. Teaching p ac ices- a io o child-
cen e ed eaching p ac ices compa ed wi h eache -di ec ed p ac ices. cDis ibu ion o eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion. Values in bold a e signi ican .
Chaudhu i e al. 10.3389/ educ.2023.1283701
F on ie s in Educa ion 08 on ie sin.o g
Thi d, he media ing e ec o eache s’ eaching p ac ices on he
associa ion be ween eache s’ s ess and hei isual ocus o a en ion
was in es iga ed. The esul s showed ha eache s’ physiological s ess,
in e ms o hei highe co isol le els a 10:00 a.m., had a small e ec
on hei sho e o al ixa ion du a ion on s uden s. Howe e , he e
was an indi ec e ec o eache s’ psychological s ess on hei isual
ocus o a en ion (dis ibu ion o isual a en ion and ixa ion coun s)
h ough hei eaching p ac ices. In o he wo ds, on a posi i e no e,
less psychological s ess was ela ed o mo e child-cen e ed eaching
p ac ices, which in u n was ela ed o mo e indi idualized
dis ibu ion o isual a en ion and mo e ixa ions on s uden s. I is
plausible ha employing mo e child-cen e ed eaching p ac ices
would in ol e inc eased eache s’ isual a en ion on s uden s o
p o ide indi idual suppo in o de o encou age hei academic and
social skills de elopmen (Chaudhu i e al., 2022b). Howe e , on a
nega i e no e, high psychological s ess could be ela ed o mo e
eache -cen e ed eaching p ac ices, which in u n could be ela ed o
less isual ocus o a en ion on s uden s. This esul is suppo ed by
p e ious esea ch s a ing ha eache s expe iencing high le els o
psychological s ess end o show low quali y o class oom
o ganiza ion, o e less emo ional suppo (Pen inen e al., 2020), and
use less ins uc ional dialogue o suppo s uden s’ highe -o de
hinking skills (Bo iani e al., 2019). The e o e, ou esul s a e in line
wi h he hypo hesis ha eache s’ highe physiological and
psychological s ess is ela ed o hei isual ocus o a en ion in he
class oom and esul ing in employing less child-cen e ed eaching
p ac ices compa ed wi h eache -di ec ed p ac ices.
4.1 P ac ical implica ions o he s udy
Teache s need o beawa e o hei s ess le els as hey a e linked
o he eaching p ac ices hey use in he class oom which in u n link
o hei isual ocus o a en ion o he s uden s. Fo example, mobile
eye- acking echnology can beused du ing in-se ice ainings o
gene a e eache ’s awa eness o hei isual ocus o a en ion owa d
s uden s. P e ious esea ch has shown ha while wa ching hei own
eaching ideos, eache s e lec ed mo e c i ically on hei own
eaching p ac ices and sugges ed al e na i e eaching s a egies (Kelle
e al., 2021; Muhonen e al., 2023).
4.2 Limi a ions and u u e esea ch
di ec ions
The p esen s udy has some limi a ions. Fi s , his s udy was c oss-
sec ional in design. In he u u e, a longi udinal app oach h oughou
he academic yea could p o ide in-dep h insigh s in o issues ha a ec
eache ’s wo k- ela ed s ess, eaching p ac ices, and isual ocus o
a en ion. Second, eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion was measu ed o
he i s 20–25 min o a lesson, whe eas eaching p ac ices we e assessed
based on h ee ull lessons. In he u u e, i could bebene icial o eco d
en i e lessons in o de o s udy he a ia ion in eache s’ isual ocus o
a en ion du ing he beginning, middle, and end o a lesson. P e ious
esea ch has shown ha eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion a ies based
on hei pedagogical in en ions. Fo example, eache s ocus hei
a en ion mo e on ask- ela ed a ge s when gi ing ins uc ion han
while e lec ing on asks (Maa a e al., 2021). Thi d, s uden - ela ed
ac o s and class oom composi ion we e no conside ed in he p esen
s udy. I is possible ha he e a e mo e con ex ual ac o s, such as
s uden s’ academic skill le els (Chaudhu i e al., 2022b), ha in luence
he ela ionships be ween eache s’ s ess, eaching p ac ices, and
eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion. Also, we an sepa a e eg ession
models o each o h ee ou comes and each o h ee s ess measu es
due o he small sample size and he isk o mul icollinea i y. Howe e ,
his inc eases he chance o Type Ie o s. In he u u e, mul ile el
modeling app oaches need o beused o in es iga e o he physiological
measu es ela ed o eache s such as anxie y, and emo ional a ousal in
associa ion wi h eache ’s isual ocus o a en ion he eby allowing he
examina ion o eache s’ in aindi idual di e ences. Fu he mo e, i
would bebene icial o in es iga e whe he eache s’ physiological and
psychological s ess, eaching p ac ices, and eache s’ isual ocus o
a en ion a y based on eache s’ wo k expe ience, pa icula ly,
be ween no ice and expe eache s. Las ly, majo i y o he sample in
his s udy consis ed o emales and he e was li le ep esen a ion o he
male gende (N = 3). This could be conside ed as a limi a ion in
unde s anding how eaching ela ed s ess, eaching p ac ices, and
eache isual ocus o a en ion could a y ac oss eache s’ gende s.
5 Conclusion
The cu en s udy makes a unique con ibu ion o he exis ing
li e a u e by examining bo h physiological and psychological s ess
and hei ole in eache s’ isual ocus o a en ion in au hen ic
class oom si ua ions. The esul s indica e ha eache s’ psychological
s ess is ela ed o hei isual ocus o a en ion h ough hei eaching
p ac ices. Acco dingly, eache s need o beencou aged o de elop
coping s a egies in ela ion o hei wo k- ela ed s ess since i e ec s
hei eaching p ac ices and class oom beha io owa d s uden s.
Da a a ailabili y s a emen
The da ase s p esen ed in his a icle a e no eadily a ailable
because co isol and eye- acking da a canno be sha ed publicly.
Reques s o access he da ase s should be di ec ed o he p incipal
in es iga o o he p ojec , M-KL (ma ja-k is iina.le kkanen@jyu. i).
E hics s a emen
The s udies in ol ing humans we e app o ed by Uni e si y o
Jy äskylä’s e hical commi ee. The s udies we e conduc ed in
acco dance wi h he local legisla ion and ins i u ional equi emen s.
W i en in o med consen o pa icipa ion in his s udy was p o ided
by he pa icipan s’ legal gua dians/nex o kin.
Au ho con ibu ions
SC: Concep ualiza ion, In es iga ion, Me hodology, So wa e,
W i ing – o iginal d a , W i ing – e iew & edi ing. A-LJ:
Concep ualiza ion, Fo mal analysis, Me hodology, So wa e,
Visualiza ion, W i ing – o iginal d a , W i ing – e iew & edi ing. EP:
Concep ualiza ion, Funding acquisi ion, Me hodology, Resou ces,