scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Divergent evolution in the cytoplasmic domains of PRLR and GHR genes in Artiodactyla

Read accessible full text

Divergent evolution in the cytoplasmic domains of PRLR and GHR genes in Artiodactyla

Author: Iso-Touru, Terhi,Kantanen, Juha,Li, Menghua,Gizejewski, Zygmunt,Vilkki, Johanna
Publisher: BioMed Central,uk,London
Year: 2011
Source: https://jukuri.luke.fi/bitstream/10024/475609/1/TerhiIT.pdf
BioMed Cen al
Page 1 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
BMC E olu iona y Biology
Open Access
Resea ch a icle
Di e gen e olu ion in he cy oplasmic domains o PRLR and GHR
genes in A iodac yla
Te hi Iso-Tou u*1, Juha Kan anen1, Meng-Hua Li1,3, Zygmun Gizejewski2
and Johanna Vilkki1
Add ess: 1Bio echnology and Food Resea ch, MTT Ag i ood Resea ch Finland, 31600 Jokioinen, Finland, 2Ins i u e o Animal Rep oduc ion and
Food Resea ch, Polish Academy o Sciences, Pl-10-747 Olsz yn, Tuwima 10, Poland and 3Ecological Gene ics Resea ch Uni , Depa men o
Biological and En i onmen al Sciences, PO Box 65, FI-00014 Uni e si y o Helsinki, Finland
Email: Te hi Iso-Tou u* - [email p o ec ed]; Juha Kan anen - j[email p o ec ed]; Meng-Hua Li - menghua.[email p o ec ed];
Zygmun Gizejewski - [email p o ec ed]; Johanna Vilkki - [email p o ec ed]
* Co esponding au ho
Abs ac
Backg ound: P olac in ecep o (PRLR) and g ow h ho mone ecep o (GHR) belong o he
la ge supe amily o class 1 cy okine ecep o s. Bo h o hem ha e been iden i ied as candida e
genes a ec ing key quan i a i e ai s, like g ow h and ep oduc ion in li es ock. We ha e
p e iously s udied he molecula ana omy o he cy oplasmic domain o GHR in di e en ca le
b eeds and a iodac yl species. In his s udy we ha e analysed he co esponding cy oplasmic
signalling egion o PRLR.
Resul s: We sequenced PRLR gene exon 10, coding o he majo pa o he cy oplasmic domain,
om ca le, Ame ican bison, Eu opean bison, yak, sheep, pig and wild boa indi iduals. We ound
di e en pa e ns o a ia ion in he wo ecep o s wi hin and be ween uminan s and pigs. Pigs and
bison species ha e no a ia ion wi hin GHR exon 10, bu show high haplo ype di e si y o he
PRLR exon 10. In ca le, PRLR shows lowe di e si y han GHR. The Bo inae PRLR haplo ype
ne wo k i s be e he known phylogene ic ela ionships be ween he species han ha o he
GHR, whe e di e ences wi hin ca le b eeds a e la ge han be ween he di e en species in he
sub amily. By compa ison wi h he wild boa haplo ypes, a high numbe o subsequen
nonsynonymous subs i u ions seem o ha e accumula ed in he pig PRLR exon 10 a e
domes ica ion.
Conclusion: Bo h genes a ec a mul i ude o ai s ha ha e been a ge s o selec ion a e
domes ica ion. The genes seem o ha e esponded di e en ly o di e en selec ion p essu es
imposed by human a i icial selec ion. The esul s sugges possible e ec s o selec i e sweeps in
GHR be o e domes ica ion in he pig lineage o species di e gence in he Bison lineage. The PRLR
esul s may be explained by s ong di ec ional selec ion in pigs o unc ional swi ching.
Backg ound
Domes ica ion o he unique o m o mu ualism ha
de elops be ween a human popula ion and a a ge ani-
mal popula ion has s ong selec i e ad an ages o bo h
pa ne s [1]. Li es ock domes ica ion s a ed a ound
10000 yea s ago in he Fe ile C escen , beginning wi h
Published: 22 July 2009
BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-172
Recei ed: 11 May 2009
Accep ed: 22 July 2009
This a icle is a ailable om: h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
© 2009 Iso-Tou u e al; licensee BioMed Cen al L d.
This is an Open Access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/2.0),
which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal wo k is p ope ly ci ed.
BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
Page 2 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
goa s and sheep [2]. Impo an ai s ega ding domes ica-
ion include beha iou and ep oduc ion as well as dai y-
ing [3]. Milking o he uminan animals was p ac iced
in ensi ely al eady o e 8000 yea s ago (six h and se en h
millennia BC) in no hwes Ana olia. Domes ica ed li e-
s ock species ha e unde gone and a e cons an ly unde
a i icial selec ion. S ong di ec ional selec ion in domes-
ic animals is pos ula ed o ha e led o selec i e sweeps in
which alleles a loci ha unde lie selec ed ai s (g ow h,
e ili y, milk p oduc ion, coa colou ) ha e dec eased o
inc eased ma kedly in hei equency [4]. A ecen
genome wide analysis o ca le iden i ied de ec able signa-
u es o domes ica ion and a i icial selec ion in he ca le
genome, bu also ha he cu en le els o di e si y wi hin
b eeds a e a leas as g ea as wi hin humans [5]. Howe e ,
he e ec s o domes ica ion and a i icial selec ion a e s ill
mos ly unknown a he le el o nucleo ide sequence a i-
a ion.
Accumula ing knowledge o he domes ic species
genomes has enabled mapping o loci a ec ing key ai s
unde a i icial selec ion in li es ock. In ca le, nume ous
such quan i a i e ai loci (QTL) ha e been iden i ied.
O e i y QTLs ha e been localized o ca le ch omosome
20 h p://genomes.sapac.edu.au/bo ineq l/. Two in e es -
ing candida e genes wi h po en ial e ec s on a ious ag o-
nomically impo an ai s, p olac in ecep o (PRLR) and
g ow h ho mone ecep o (GHR) loca e in his ch omo-
some a a dis ance o 7.5 Mb (B au4.0, Oc .2007, h p://
www.ensembl.o g). An S o N subs i u ion (S18N) in he
signal pep ide o he PRLR is linked wi h p o ein and a
yield [6] and he subs i u ion F279N in he ansmem-
b ane pa o he GHR has been sugges ed o be a quan i-
a i e ai nucleo ide/causa i e mu a ion a ec ing milk
a and p o ein pe cen age [7].
Bo h GHR and PRLR belong o he supe amily o class I
cy okine ecep o s, which p esumably a ose as he esul
o mul iple gene duplica ions and subsequen di e gen
e olu ion. GHR and PRLR sha e a common e ia y s uc-
u e (an ex acellula domain, a single memb ane span-
ning ansmemb ane domain, and a cy oplasmic
domain). They media e he signals o hei ligands, he
g ow h ho mone (GH), p olac in (PRL) and placen al lac-
ogen (PL). The binding o he ligand o he ex acellula
pa induces homo- o he e odime iza ion o he ecep-
o s, ollowed by in acellula signal ansmission by he
JAK-S a signalling pa hway [8,9]. Bo h GHR and PRLR a e
in ol ed in mamma y g ow h and unc ion. The main
biological ole o he GH is he con ol o pos na al
g ow h, whe eas he addi ional epo ed e ec s o PRL
include in ol emen in seasonali y, ep oduc ion, beha -
iou and immuno egula ion. Amino acid sequence iden-
i y be ween GHR and PRLR a ies be ween 30% and 70%
depending on he pa o he ecep o . The g ea es simi-
la i y o he aa sequences be ween GHR and PRLR is in he
ex acellula domains. The cy oplasmic domain and espe-
cially he well conse ed BOX1 is essen ial o signal ans-
duc ion.
We ha e p e iously examined he GHR cy oplasmic
domain sequence in di e en ca le b eeds and A iodac-
yla species [10], whe e we obse ed in e es ing polymo -
phism. The aim o his s udy was o cha ac e ize pa e ns
o polymo phism in he co esponding in acellula
egion o PRLR in di e en A iodac yla species and
b eeds o enable he compa ison o sequence e olu ion in
esponse o domes ica ion and a i icial selec ion in wo
e olu iona y ela ed and closely loca ed candida e genes.
Resul s
The sequence analysis o he cy oplasmic domain o he
PRLR gene e ealed in e es ing a ia ion in wild and
domes ica ed A iodac yla species and subspecies (Table
1). Al oge he 13 SNPs we e ound om he ca le sam-
ples. O hese six we e p esen in bo h Eu opean and A i-
can ca le: one nsSNP (E378K) and i e sSNPs (N 1088,
N 1427, N 1622, N 1754, and N 1775). Eu opean ca le
had wo p i a e nsSNPs (P340T, A536V) and wo p i a e
sSNPs (N 1682, N 1817) while A ican ca le had wo p i-
a e nsSNPs (V439M and L497R) and one p i a e sSNP
(N 1769). The ca le SNPs we e in e ed o seg ega e as 14
haplo ypes (Figu e 1) wo o which we e sha ed by Eu o-
pean and A ican ca le (haplo ypes BOS_PRLR1 and
BOS_PRLR2). Ame ican bison and Eu opean bison
sha ed one nsSNP (E384K). Besides ha , Ame ican bison
had one p i a e nsSNP (D588E). Eu opean bison samples
we e mo e di e gen ; hey had wo p i a e nsSNPs
(Q397K and M446V) and one sSNP (N 1730). S a is i-
cally in e ed haplo ypes o he Ame ican bison and
Eu opean bison a e gi en in Figu e 1. Ame ican bison and
Eu opean bison sha e one haplo ype, BBI_PRLR3/
BBO_PRLR3. The s udied yak samples we e monomo -
phic (Figu e 1). Sheep samples ca ied ou sSNP
(N 1007, N 1160, N 1217, and N 1400) and h ee nsSNP
(E387K, A476T, and S480R) in exon 10. The E387K posi-
ion has been ixed o E in he Bos lineage and K in he
Bison lineage.
S a is ical haplo ype econs uc ion unco e ed 4 di e en
sheep haplo ypes. Cloning o one ambiguous sheep indi-
idual e ealed wo unique haplo ypes (OVIS_PRLR5 and
OVIS_PRLR6) and hese haplo ypes we e included in u -
he analysis (Figu e 2). Numbe ing o he Bos and Bison,
and O is SNPs is based on he e e ence sequence
NM_001039726. All Bos, Bison and O is SNPs we e in
Ha dy-Weinbe g equilib ium.
F om he domes ic pig samples we ound one sSNP
(N 1620) and eigh nsSNPs (L406P, D428A, A461G,
BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
Page 3 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
K480R, M510L, G534S, G597S, and A601V). Numbe ing
o he pig SNPs is based on he pig cDNA sequence
DQ157757, acco ding o he numbe ing o p e iously
iden i ied SNPs [11]. All SNPs we e in Ha dy-Weinbe g
equilib ium. The SNPs in pig exon 10 cons i u e 5 di e -
en haplo ypes (Figu e 3). Se en ou o nine wild boa
indi iduals we e SUS_PRLR4 homozygo es, one indi id-
ual was SUS_PRLR5 homozygo e and one indi idual had
haplo ype SUS_PRLR4 and haplo ype SUS_PRLR4-del.
SUS_PRLR4-del haplo ype has a h ee-nucleo ide dele ion
(N 1439 – N 1441) inducing lack o aa 480. PRLR haplo-
ype sequences om he di e en species ha e been
deposi ed in GenBank h p://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go wi h
he accession numbe s FJ901275 – FJ901301 and
FJ901303 – FJ901307.
Compa ison o a ia ion in he GHR and PRLR cy oplas-
mic domains in he species analysed in bo h s udies is p e-
sen ed in Table 1. New esul s om he wild boa and
Eu opean bison GHR sequencing ha e been added. All
wild boa s we e monomo phic ha ing he same haplo-
ype in GHR exon 10 as domes ic pigs (FJ901302) and
Eu opean bison was shown o ha e he same GHR exon
10 haplo ype [GenBank:DQ062723] as Ame ican bison.
The mos d ama ic di e ence in he a ia ion be ween
GHR and PRLR wi hin species is seen in he domes ic pig.
The comple e lack o a ia ion in GHR is con as ed wi h
he high haplo ype and nucleo ide di e si y in he PRLR,
consis ing o mainly nonsynonymous a ia ion.
In he Bo inae sub amily PRLR and GHR show di e en
ea u es in he wo Bison species om ca le. The Bison spe-
cies, like pigs, a e monomo phic o GHR; bu show high
le el o haplo ype di e si y in PRLR. The A ican ca le
shows equally high le els o di e si y a bo h genes,
whe eas in Eu opean ca le he haplo ype and nucleo ide
di e si y is lowe a PRLR. The yak is monomo phic o
bo h genes. Sheep belongs o he same amily, Bo idae, as
Bo inae species. Sheep has simila numbe o nsSNPs in
GHR as in PRLR; howe e PRLR in all is mo e polymo -
phic.
The di e en indices o neu ali y a PRLR, Tajima's D
alue, Fu and Li's D* and F* alues a e mainly e lec ing
he same pa e n wi h each o he . The D alues o A ican
ca le, Eu opean bison and domes ic pig a e posi i e and
o Eu opean ca le and sheep nega i e (Table 1). Only he
alues o A ican ca le (bo h a PRLR and GHR) de ia e
s a is ically signi ican ly om ze o. A i icially selec ed
popula ions, like li es ock species, do no ul il he
assump ions o andom ma ing and cons an popula ion
size o he neu ali y es , hence posi i e Tajima's D al-
ues a e likely due o he demog aphic his o ies o hese
species o b eeds a he han ue balancing selec ion.
Conside ing he known his o y o zebu- au ine c oss-
b eeding in A ica [12], he obse ed allelic di e si y is
mos likely caused by admix u e
A sliding window plo o he nucleo ide di e gence along
PRLR exon 10 in 18 e eb a e species is p esen ed in Fig-
u e 4. Two egions o low nucleo ide di e si y a e e iden ,
one a he beginning and one in he egion be ween 270
bp and 400 bp om he beginning o he exon 10. All E o
K amino acid changes in Bo idae (ca le E378K, Ame i-
Table 1: Di e si y and neu ali y indices in exon 10 o PRLR and GHR genes in he s udied species.
Gene Species No. o No. o Tajima's Fu and Li's
n lengh (bp) ns s haplo ypes HdS±T±DD*F*
PRLR Eu opean Ca le (Bos au us) 216 891 3 7 9 0.44 0.84 1.69 -1.08 -0.41 -0.8
A ican Ca le (Bos indicus) 22 891 3 6 7 0.76 3.98 2.32 2.05* 1.36 1.86*
Yak (Bos g unniens) 4891 1
Ame ican bison (Bison bison) 3 891 2 0 3 0.73 1.05 0.98 0.31 0.06 0.12
Eu opean bison (Bison bonasus) 5 891 3 1 3 0.73 2.17 1.59 1.41 1.24 1.43
Sheep (O is a ies) 14 891 3 4 6 0.61 1.18 1.4 -0.47 -0.78 -0.8
Domes ic pig (Sus sc o a) 18 750 8 1 5 0.63 3.27 2.89 0.39 1.36 1.24
Wild boa (Sus Sc o a)9750112
0.21 0.56 0.78 -0.68 0.88 0.53
GHR Eu opean Ca le (Bos au us) 202 900 4 3 18 0.69 2.07 1.18 1.47 1.09 1.47
A ican Ca le (Bos indicus) 47 900 4 6 7 0.72 3.97 2.17 2.13* 1.38 1.94*
Yak (Bos g unniens) 4 900 1
Ame ican bison (Bison bison)3900 1
Eu opean bison (Bison bonasus) 6900 1
Sheep (O is a ies) 14 900 3 4 0.66 1.18 0.86 0.92 0.96 1.1
Domes ic pig (Sus sc o a)18690 1
Wild boa (Sus Sc o a)9690 1
Eu opean ca le b eeds a e g ouped and A ican ca le b eeds a e g ouped. ns = nsSNP, s = sSNP, Hd = haplo ype di e si y, S = nucleo ide di e si y,
TW = Wa e son's he a es ima o , * P < 0.05, ± pe kilobase be ween sequences, does no include SUS_PRLRL4_del haplo ype
BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
Page 4 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
can/Eu opean bison E384K, and sheep E387K) a e wi hin
27 bp in he second low di e si y module and addi ion-
ally one Eu opean bison K o Q subs i u ion and wo pig
subs i u ions (L406P and D428A) all inside his egion.
We s udied he possible impac s o he aa changes o he
p o ein s uc u e wi h he me hods implemen ed in SIFT
and PolyPhen p og ams [13,14]. The subs i u ion E378K
ound in ca le was p edic ed o a ec p o ein unc ion by
SIFT analysis (sco e 0.02). Two o he SNPs, E384K in bo h
bison species and V439M in ca le, go SIFT sco es below
0.1 (Table 2). This cu -o alue has been sugges ed o p o-
ide be e sensi i i y o de ec ing dele e ious SNPs [13].
E (glu amic acid) is a pola , acidic amino acid; K (lysine)
is a pola and basic amino acid; V ( aline) and M (me hio-
nine) a e nonpola and neu al amino acids.
Linkage disequilib ium (LD) analysis e ealed ha in
Eu opean ca le only one pai wise SNP compa ison
showed LD ( 2 = 1). On he o he hand, in A ican ca le
se en pai wise SNP compa isons we e in LD ( 2 = 1). The
same LD pa e n was isible in GHR exon 10 [10]. In
sheep one pai wise SNP compa ison was in LD ( 2 = 1), in
pigs wo pai wise SNP compa isons showed LD ( 2 = 1).
A pa simony haplo ype ne wo k o he sub amily Bo i-
nae is p esen ed in Figu e 5a. Mos o he common ca le
haplo ypes di e om he majo haplo ype BOS_PRLR1
only by one nucleo ide. Howe e , he e a e se e al
deduced in e media e haplo ypes ha we e no seen in
his s udy (and some o he subs i u ions a e p esen in
wo di e en loca ions on he ne wo k). The mos com-
mon haplo ype o he A ican ca le is BOS_PRLR4. I is
absen in Eu opean ca le and di e s by wo nonsynony-
mous and i e synonymous subs i u ions om he
BOS_PRLR1 ( he mos common haplo ype o he Eu o-
pean ca le). Thus he BOS_PRLR4 as well as BOS_PRLR9,
BOS_PRLR10, BOS_PRLR11 and BOS_PRLR12 p obably
ep esen zebu haplo ypes in ou da a, e lec ing he deep
di e gence be ween he au ine and zebu genomes [12].
Acco ding o he PRLR ne wo k, he yaks a e mo e closely
ela ed o he genus Bison han o he genus Bos. The mos
equen ca le haplo ype BOS_PRLR1 and he yak haplo-
S a is ically in e ed ca le, yak, Ame ican bison and Eu opean bison haplo ypes om he PRLR exon 10Figu e 1
S a is ically in e ed ca le, yak, Ame ican bison and Eu opean bison haplo ypes om he PRLR exon 10. Only
a iable si es a e shown. SNP numbe ing is based on he sequence NM_001039726.1. Amino acid numbe ing s a s om he
i s me hionine in he p o ein sequence NP_001034815.1.
                        




   !!!"#$ %  &
   
 
   
'$())))*$ + $ !
,-./+%+ 00000 0000000
,-./+%+00000 0000000
,-./+%+0000 0000000
,-./+%+000000000
,-./+%+00000 000000
,-./+%+ 00000 00000000
,-./+%+ 0000 0000000
,-./+%+ 00000 0000000
,-./+%+ 0000 0000000
,-./+%+ 0000 000000
,-./+%+ 00000 000000
,-./+%+000000000
,-./+%+00000 000000
,-./+%+ 0000 00000000
,-.1/+%+ 00 0000000000
,2/+%+ 00000000000
,2/+%+00000000000
,2/+%+3,2/+%+0000000000
,2/+%+ 0000000000
,2/+%+000000000000
BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
Page 5 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
ype BOSg _PRLR1 di e by h ee nonsynonymous and
by se en synonymous subs i u ions, whe eas he yak hap-
lo ype di e s om he Ame ican bison haplo ype
BBI_PRLR1 by h ee nonsynonymous subs i u ions. The
haplo ype BBI_PRLR1 di e s by i e nonsynonymous and
by six synonymous subs i u ions om he BOS_PRLR1.
Sheep haplo ypes di e om each o he wi h one o wo
subs i u ions, OVIS_PRLR1 being he majo sheep haplo-
ype (Figu e 5b). Figu e 5c p esen s he pa simony ne -
wo k om he Sus da a. Subs i u ion G534S is he only
polymo phism ha occu s wice in he ne wo k. The
majo wild boa haplo ype SUS_PRLR4 is sepa a ed om
he wo mos di e ged domes ic pig haplo ypes
SUS_PRLR2 and SUS_PRLR3 by i e nonsynonymous
subs i u ions.
Discussion
In his s udy we demons a e di e en pa e ns o a ia-
ion in PRLR and GHR in uminan s and pigs, sugges ing
di e gen e olu ion and selec ion p essu es be o e and
a e domes ica ion.
The PRLR molecula ana omy shows in e es ing di e -
ences om he GHR. The Bo inae PRLR haplo ype ne -
wo k is e y di e en om ha o he GHR [10], whe e
di e ences wi hin Eu opean b eeds, wi hin A ican b eeds
and be ween Eu opean/A ican b eeds we e la ge han
be ween di e en species (ca le, yak, Ame ican bison as
well Eu opean bison (da a om Eu opean bison ob ained
om his s udy)). The PRLR ne wo k i s be e o he
known phylogene ic ela ionships be ween species.
Wi hin ca le b eeds, Eu opean ca le a e lacking majo
p i a e PRLR haplo ypes in con as o he p e ious GHR
s udy. Ins ead he wo majo haplo ypes, BOS_PRLR1 and
BOS_PRLR2 a e sha ed be ween Eu opean and A ican
ca le.
Du ing pig domes ica ion in Eu ope (s a ed abou 6000
yea s ago), domes ica ed p ogeny o he local Eu opean
wild boa s eplaced in oduced nea eas e n domes ic pigs
[15]. Acco ding o he coalescen heo y he mos equen
haplo ype in a popula ion le el s udy is he ances al hap-
lo ype [16], on he o he hand Wa e son e al [17] a gued
ha he highe he mu a ion a e, he less likely i is ha
he mos equen allele would be he oldes . Conside ing
he popula ion his o y o he pigs, we assume ha he
majo wild boa haplo ype SUS_PRLR4, e en hough no
he mos equen haplo ype is a good candida e o being
he ances al haplo ype o he Eu opean domes ic pig. I
ue, subs i u ions leading o es o he domes ic pig
Sus_PRLR haplo ypes ha e happened a e he domes ica-
ion, as he haplo ypes a e de i ed by a se ies o consecu-
i e subs i u ions. The esul is simila wi h he esul
ob ained om he MC1R gene ha has an e ec on coa
colou in pigs [18]. MC1R alleles/haplo ypes di e by
S a is ically in e ed sheep haplo ypes om he PRLR exon 10Figu e 2
S a is ically in e ed sheep haplo ypes om he
PRLR exon 10.
       




 !  .



)'+
-$4./+%+ 000
-$4./+%+00
-$4./+%+00000
-$4./+%+00
-$4./+%+000
-$4./+%+ 000
S a is ically in e ed pig haplo ypes om he PRLR exon 10Figu e 3
S a is ically in e ed pig haplo ypes om he PRLR
exon 10.
         




 % &  )  
 


+%. .$
.5./+%+ 00
.5./+%+00
.5./+%+0
.5./+%+0
.5./+%+00

BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
Page 6 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
mo e han one nonsynonymous mu a ion om he wild-
ype, implying a long his o y o s ong posi i e selec ion
o coa colou a ian s. I is a gued ha coa colou phe-
no ypes esul om di ec human selec ion [18]. Th ee
domes ic pig haplo ypes di e om he SUS_PRLR4 by
wo o mo e nonsynonymous subs i u ions, he la ges
di e ence being i e nonsynonymous subs i u ions. The
apid accumula ion o mu a ions in he PRLR gene in he
pig is bes explained by human in luence. Domes ica ion
and ollowing selec ion o ag icul u al pu poses ha e
educed b eed e ec i e popula ion sizes o ela i ely
small numbe s. In a popula ion wi h low Ne a la ge ac-
ion o sligh ly dele e ious mu a ions can each ixa ion
due o less e icien pu i ying selec ion [19]. This may p o-
ide one explana ion o he obse ed polymo phism in
PRLR. Howe e , he GHR gene is monomo phic in he
same pig sample, sugges ing di e en selec ion p essu es
(selec i e sweep o s ong pu i ying selec ion in GHR,
s ong posi i e selec ion o PRLR).
A e domes ica ion he ep oduc ion pe o mance o he
pig has inc eased se e al olds due o an inc ease in li e s
pe yea and pigle s pe li e [20]. This has been made
possible by selec ion and making he en i onmen mo e
a ou able o he sow o alloca e esou ces o mo e o -
sp ing. Many s udies in pigs ha e e ealed signi ican
associa ion o PRLR polymo phisms wi h di e en ep o-
duc ion ai s (e.g. [11,21,22]). Mouse knockou models
o he PRLR ha e con i med he impo ance o he PRL in
ep oduc ion ( e iewed by [23]). In addi ion o ep oduc-
i e pe o mance, he lis o modes o ac ions o PRLR is
long [8] and shows conside able change h ough e e-
b a e e olu ion [9].
I a gene has unde gone epea ed al e na ing unc ional
adap a ion o ul il one o wo, e en mo e, unc ions, i
can lead o accumula ion o many amino acid subs i u-
ions wi h sligh ly li le o e all change o unc ion. This
phenomenon has been called unc ional swi ching [24]
and could hus explain PRLR polymo phism. Based on
he s udies done wi h he domes ic animals (e.g.
[6,7,11,21,22,25]), PRLR could ul il he c i e ion o unc-
ional swi ching. Howe e , he accumula ion o mu a-
ions in he domes ic pig PRLR seems oo as o be
explained by unc ional swi ching alone.
The majo ole o GHR in ol es pos na al g ow h and
mamma y unc ion. The lack o a ia ion in he GHR sig-
nalling domain in pigs and undomes ica ed uminan s is
in iguing. The lack o a ia ion in pigs could be he esul
Table 2: P edic ed a ec ion s a us o he amino acid subs i u ions om PRLR gene exon 10
SIFT PolyPhen
Species p edic ion sco e MSC n p edic ion PSIC±n
Eu opean Ca le (Bos au us)
P340T ole a ed 0.35 3.1 30 benign 0.78 33
E378K a ec p o ein unc ion 0.02 3.12 28 benign 0.88 27
A536V ole a ed 0.34 3.1 29 benign 0.41 31
A ican Ca le (Bos indicus)
V439M ole a ed 0.07 3.1 29 benign 0.39 31
L497R ole a ed 0.36 3.1 29 benign 0.13 30
Ame ican bison (Bison bison)
E384K* ole a ed 0.06 3.08 27 benign 1.48 23
Eu opean bison (Bison bonasus)
E384K* ole a ed 0.06 3.05 29 benign 1.50 22
Q394K* ole a ed 0.16 3.05 29 benign 1.21 24
M445V* ole a ed 0.42 3.05 28 benign 1.48 22
Sheep (O is a ies)
E387K ole a ed 0.47 3.05 29 benign 0.57 31
A476T ole a ed 0.64 3.05 29 benign 0.10 30
S480R ole a ed 0.62 3.05 29 benign 0.24 31
Domes ic pig (Sus sc o a)
L406P ole a ed 0.25 3.16 27 benign 0.65 23
D428A ole a ed 0.54 3.15 29 benign 0.04 28
A461G ole a ed 0.36 3.15 29 benign 1.34 28
K480R ole a ed 0.61 3.15 29 benign 0.29 28
M510L ole a ed 0.64 3.15 29 benign 1.31 28
G534S ole a ed 0.79 3.17 25 benign 0.23 23
G597S ole a ed 0.65 3.15 25 benign 0.35 18
A601V ole a ed 0.23 3.15 25 benign 0.51 19
* analyses we e done using he cy oplasmic pa alone, MSC = median sequence conse a ion, n = numbe o sequences ep esen a his posi ion
in he p o ein alignmen , ± PSIC sco e di e ence
BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
Page 7 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
o a s ong selec i e sweep ha has happened be o e
domes ica ion and has been main ained in domes ic pigs.
On he o he hand, he low di e si y in he wild boa may
e lec a na ow gene ic backg ound o he Finnish wild
boa popula ion. The possible a ge (causa i e mu a ion)
o selec ion a o close o he GHR exon 10 is no known.
In con as , he GHR gene cy oplasmic domain in cu en
ca le b eeds ha bou s lo s o in e es ing pe sis en poly-
mo phism, indica ing i s possible impo ance o ca le
being malleable o a i icial selec ion o g ow h and lac-
a ion ai s [10].
The PRLR gene on he o he hand shows con as ing e o-
lu ion in he s udied species, ha ing mo e subs i u ion
polymo phism in pig b eeds and bison species han in
ca le. Func ional analysis indica ed possible e ec s o
nsSNPs ound in ca le and bison, bu didn' e eal any
e ec on he p o ein s uc u e o pig nsSNPs. Howe e ,
me hods de ining e ec s o SNPs a e only p edic ions,
and he combined e ec s o a ious nsSNPs can no be
analysed by cu en s a is ical me hods. No known 3D
s uc u e o PRLR is a ailable, so mo e de ailed analysis
whe he he subs i u ion si es a e in spa ial con ac wi h
c i ical esidues emains unknown. Func ional analysis a
he molecula le el would be necessa y o sol e he ele-
ance o he polymo phisms.
Domes ica ion is a cumula i e p ocess ma ked by changes
on bo h sides o he mu ualis ic ela ionship. Long-li ing
animals like ca le espond slowe o selec ion han o
example annual c ops [1]. T ai s ha ha e been he a ge
o domes ica ion and subsequen selec ion and he genes
ha a ec hem, i.e. so called domes ica ion genes, a e o
special in e es e en hough he success o iden i y hese
genes om li es ock has been low [1,4]. Genes iden i ied
by QTL s udies a e good candida es o genes impo an
o domes ica ion success [1].
Conclusion
QTL candida e genes GHR and PRLR ha e a ying oles in
g ow h, lac a ion and ep oduc ion in domes ic species
and may ha e esponded di e en ly in di e en species
and b eeds wi hin species o di e en selec ion p essu es.
We show he e ha hese genes ha e di e en e olu iona y
his o y among a iodac yls. Mos likely bo h genes ha e
been hea ily in luenced by a i icial selec ion du ing and
a e domes ica ion. We ound an unan icipa ed amoun
o nonsynonymous a ia ion accumula ed o pe sis ed in
hese genes in a iodac yl species du ing he sho pe iod
o domes ica ion (8000 – 10 000 yea s) and subsequen
a i icial selec ion. The di e ences be ween species indi-
ca e possible e ec s o selec i e sweeps be o e domes ica-
ion (GHR in pigs) o be o e species di e gence (GHR in
Bison), di ec ional (a i icial) selec ion (PRLR in pigs) o
unc ional swi ching (GHR in ca le, PRLR).
Sliding window p esen a ion o he nucleo ide di e gence along PRLR exon 10 among 18 di e en speciesFigu e 4
Sliding window p esen a ion o he nucleo ide di e gence along PRLR exon 10 among 18 di e en species. B a
= ca le, Bbi = Ame ican bison, Bbo = Eu opean bison, O is = sheep, Sus = pig. The posi ions o he de ec ed SNPs a e shown
on he X-axis.
BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
Page 8 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
Me hods
Ma e ials
We in es iga ed 216 indi iduals om 12 di e en Eu o-
pean Bos au us b eeds (comme cial dai y b eeds: Finnish
Ay shi e, Finnish Hols ein-F iesian; na i e Finnish dai y
b eeds: Wes e n Finnca le, No he n Finnca le, Eas e n
Finnca le, Russian b eeds: Kholmogo , Yaku Ca le, Bes-
uzhe , and Belo ussian Red, and Sou heas Eu opean
b eeds: Busa, Podolian, and Uk ainian G ey). In addi ion,
we s udied 22 samples om 3 di e en A ican b eeds
om E hiopia wi h unknown Bos indicus backg ound
(Ba ka; mo phological zebu- ype, Raya; mo phological
sanga- ype, and Foge a; zebu-sanga in e media e). Ca le
samples o igina ed om 6 di e en coun ies (Finland,
Russia, Uk aine, Byelo ussia, Se bia, and E hiopia). As e -
e ences we s udied 3 Ame ican bison indi iduals (Bison
bison) om one b eeding s ock, 6 Eu opean bison (Bison
bonasus) samples om Poland, and 4 yak (Bos g unniens)
samples om Russia. O he s udied species included 14
sheep (O is a ies) ep esen ing 6 di e en b eeds om
Russia, Poland and Finland (Romano b eed, W zosowka
b eed, Dages an local, Andi, sheep om Komi illage,
Finnsheep, and Ålandsheep), 18 pigs (Sus sc o a) ep e-
sen ing La ge Whi e, Land ace, Hampshi e and Du oc
b eeds, and 9 wild boa samples (Sus sc o a) om h ee
di e en Finnish wild boa a ms. Indi iduals om he
Pa simony ne wo k econs uc ionsFigu e 5
Pa simony ne wo k econs uc ions. a) Bo inae haplo ype ne wo k. Di e en colou s ep esen di e en ca le b eed
g oups and/o species. b) O is haplo ype ne wo k c) Sus haplo ype ne wo k. The size o he pie is p opo ional o he e-
quency o he haplo ype o he b eed g oup in ques ion and he size o he node a ea is p opo ional o he o al equency o
he haplo ype in he whole popula ion. Small black ci cles ep esen he hypo he ical haplo ypes no p esen in his s udy. BOS
= ca le, Bbi = Ame ican bison, Bbo = Eu opean bison, BOSg = yak, SUS = pig, OVIS = sheep.
BMC E olu iona y Biology 2009, 9:172 h p://www.biomedcen al.com/1471-2148/9/172
Page 9 o 11
(page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
same b eed/species we e sampled o be as un ela ed as
possible. Eu opean bison is an endange ed species and all
cu en animals (app oxima ely 3200 indi iduals)
descend om 12 ounde animals [26]. All he s udied
species belong o he same o de , A iodac yla. Pig
belongs o he amily Suidae, while all o he species
belong o he amily Bo idae. Ca le and yak a e om he
genus Bos, while Ame ican and Eu opean bison belong o
genus Bison.
Gene ic analysis
Genomic DNA was ex ac ed om blood o semen sam-
ples using sal ing ou p ocedu e [27]. The p olac in ecep-
o gene exon 10 was ampli ied in wo agmen s wi h he
same p ime se s om ca le, yak, and bison samples.
Exon 10 om he pig and sheep samples was ampli ied in
one agmen . P ime s we e designed wi h he P ime 3
h p:// odo.wi.mi .edu/ using e e ence sequences [Gen-
Bank: NM_001039726 and DQ458765.1]. The PRLR
exon 10 sequence o he uminan comp ises o 891 bp
(297 aa), which was sequenced en i ely, and ha o he
pig is 1023 bp (341 aa) long, o which we sequenced 750
bp (250 aa). In addi ion, Eu opean bison and wild boa
GHR exon 10 we e analysed using same me hods and
p ime s as desc ibed in [10]. P ime sequences a e a aila-
ble om TI-T upon eques .
In polyme ase chain eac ion (PCR), 50 ng o genomic
DNA was used in 30 Pl olume o s anda d DYNAZyme II
(Finnzymes, Finland) PCR eac ion mix. PCR p oduc s
we e pu i ied using ExoSAP-IT enzyme (GE Heal hca e
Li e sciences, UK). Sequencing eac ions we e pe o med
wi h DYEnamic ET Te mina o Ki (GE Heal hca e Li e sci-
ences, UK). The sequencing p oduc s we e pu i ied wi h
e hanol p ecipi a ion and sepa a ed on MegaBACE 1000
(Ame sham Biosciences, UK). Each agmen was
sequenced on bo h s ands and same p ime s we e used
o he sequencing as o he agmen ampli ica ion.
Sequence da a was base-called wi h Cima on 3.12 base-
calle in p og am MegaBACE Sequence analyze .
3.0.0111.1603 (Ame sham Biosciences, UK). All
sequences we e e i ied by isual inspec ion o ch oma o-
g ams. Sequenche 4.6 (Gene Codes Co po a ion) was
used o align and co ec sequences.
S a is ical analysis
Haplo ypes we e econs uc ed using he Bayesian haplo-
ype econs uc ion me hod o single nucleo ide poly-
mo phisms (SNP) om popula ion geno ype da a
u ilizing he p og am PHASE .2.1.1 [28]. Recons uc-
ions we e done using 10000 i e a ions, 1 hinning in e -
al and 1000 as bu n-in pe iod assuming a s epwise
mu a ion model. Animals ha go haplo ype pai p oba-
bili y lowe han 0.95 we e ei he cloned o disca ded
om u he analysis. Cloning was done wi h Ze o Blun ®
TOPO® PCR Cloning Ki (In i ogen, USA) and Phusion™
High-Fideli y DNA Polyme ase (Finnzymes, Finland) ol-
lowing manu ac u e 's ins uc ions. Fi e o mo e clones
pe indi idual we e sequenced as desc ibed abo e using
uni e sal M13-p ime s. Haplo ypes we e decided acco d-
ing o he esul ob ained om he cloning.
We es ima ed nucleo ide di e si y, S (pi, [29]) and Wa e -
son's he a es ima o , TW [30] along he exon 10 and made
a sliding window plo om hese wo pa ame e s among
18 e eb a e species. Pi and he a we e calcula ed o 10
bp windows placed a 5 bp in e als using he ollowing
GenBank h p://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go sequences:
NM_204854.1 (chicken), L76587.1 ( u key),
XM_001508575.1 (pla ypus), NM_001039726.1 (cow),
NM_000949.2 (human), NM_011169.4 (mouse),
NM_001034111.1 ( a ), NM_001082231.1 (Eu opean
abbi ), XM_001500104.1 (ho se), XM_536502.2 (dog),
NM_001001868.1 (pig), NM_001085736.1 and
NM_001085616.1 (Zenopus lae is), NM_001124599.1
( ainbow ou ), DQ508436.1 (salmon),
XM_001921376.1 (Danio e io), NM_001078625.1 ( ak-
i ugu), XM_001149377.1 (chimpanzee), and
XM_001091532.1 ( hesus monkey).
We calcula ed haplo ype di e si y (Hd), nucleo ide di e -
si y (pi) and Wa e son's he a es ima o o he s udied
species sepa a ely using haplo ype sequences ob ained. Pi
is based on he a e age numbe o nucleo ide di e ences
be ween he sequences and he a is based on he o al
numbe o seg ega ing si es in he sequence. To es ima e
he e ec o selec ion, we calcula ed Tajima's D [31], and
Fu and Li's D* and F* [32] o each species/subspecies
sepa a ely. Tajima's D es compa es he di e ences
be ween he numbe o seg ega ing si es and he a e age
numbe o pai wise di e ences [31]. Unde neu ali y,
Tajima's D alue is assumed o be ze o, unde posi i e
selec ion he e is an excess o a e polymo phisms and
Tajima's D alue is nega i e. Nega i e D alues can also be
due o popula ion expansion. I he e is balancing selec-
ion in e media e equency gene ic a ian s a e kep and
Tajima's D alue is posi i e. The same holds o he Fu and
Li's D* and F* es s. Con idence in e als o he Tajima's
D and Fu and Li's D* and F* alues we e ob ained by gen-
e a ing 1000 independen coalescen simula ions assum-
ing no ecombina ion. S a is ical analysis package DnaSP
4.50.3 [33] was used o calcula e Hd, Pi, Wa e son's he a
es ima o , Tajimas's D alues and Fu and Li's D* and F*.
The impac o amino acid a ian s on p o ein s uc u e ia
analysis o mul iple sequence alignmen s was done wi h
SIFT [13] and PolyPhen so wa e [14]. SIFT uses sequence
homology o p edic whe he an amino acid subs i u ion
will a ec p o ein unc ion and hence, po en ially al e
pheno ype. I gi es no malized p obabili y sco e alue