scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Clonal variation in basic density, moisture content and heating value of wood, bark and branches in hybrid aspen

Read accessible full text

Clonal variation in basic density, moisture content and heating value of wood, bark and branches in hybrid aspen

Author: Hytönen, Jyrki,Beuker, Egbert,Viherä-Aarnio, Anneli
Publisher: Finnish Society of Forest Science
Year: 2018
Source: https://jukuri.luke.fi/bitstream/10024/541710/1/2018%20Hyt%c3%b6nen%2c%20J%2c%20Beuger%2c%20E.%2c%20%26amp%3b%20Viher%c3%a4-Aarnio.pdf
1
SILVA FENNICA
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938
Ca ego y: esea ch a icle
h ps://doi.o g/10.14214/s .9938
h p://www.sil a ennica. i
Licenced CC BY-SA 4.0
ISSN-L 0037-5330 | ISSN 2242-4075 (Online)
The Finnish Socie y o Fo es Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Jy ki Hy önen1, Egbe Beuke  2 and Anneli Vihe ä-Aa nio 3
Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en and
hea ing alue o wood, ba k and b anches in hyb id
aspen
Hy önen J., Beuke E., Vihe ä-Aa nio A. (2018). Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e
con en and hea ing alue o wood, ba k and b anches in hyb id aspen. Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no.
2 a icle id 9938. 15 p. h ps://doi.o g/10.14214/s .9938
Highligh s
• Hyb id aspen clones di e ed in hei mois u e con en , ash con en , basic densi y and hea -
ing alue.
• S em wood had lowe ash con en , basic densi y and e ec i e hea ing alue han s em ba k.
• The e was signi ican e ical a ia ion in wood and ba k along he s em in mois u e con en
and basic densi y.
Abs ac
Hyb id aspen (Populus emula × P. emuloides) is one o he as es g owing ee species in Fin-
land. Du ing he mid-1990s, a b eeding p og amme was s a ed wi h he aim o selec ing clones
ha we e supe io in p oducing pulpwood. Hyb id aspen can also be g own as a sho - o a ion
c op o bioene gy. To s udy clonal a ia ion in wood and ba k p ope ies, se en clones we e
selec ed om a 12-yea -old ield ial loca ed in sou he n Finland. F om each clone, i e ees
we e ha es ed and samples we e aken om s em wood, s em ba k and b anches o de e mine
basic densi y, e ec i e hea ing alue, mois u e and ash con en . Ve ical wi hin- ee a ia ion in
mois u e con en and basic densi y was also s udied. The di e ences be ween clones we e signi i-
can o almos all s udied p ope ies. Fo all s udied p ope ies he e was a signi ican di e ence
be ween wood and ba k. Wood had lowe ash con en (0.5% s. 3.9%), basic densi y (378 kg m–3
s. 450 kg m–3) and e ec i e hea ing alue (18.26 MJ kg–1 s. 19.24 MJ kg–1), bu highe mois-
u e con en (55% s. 49%) han ba k. The alues o b anches we e in e media e. These esul s
sugges ha he p ope ies o hyb id aspen impo an o ene gy use could be imp o ed by clonal
selec ion. Howe e , selec ing clones based on as g ow h only may be challenging since i may
lead o a dec ease in hyb id aspen wood densi y.
Keywo ds hyb id aspen; clonal a ia ion; basic densi y; ash con en ; mois u e con en ; hea ing
alue; wood; ba k; b anches
Add esses 1Na u al Resou ces Ins i u e Finland (Luke), Na u al esou ces, Teknologiaka u 7,
FI-67100 Kokkola, Finland; 2 Na u al Resou ces Ins i u e Finland (Luke), P oduc ion sys ems,
Finlandian ie 18, FI-58450 Punkaha ju, Finland; 3 Na u al Resou ces Ins i u e Finland (Luke),
P oduc ion sys ems, La oka anonkaa i 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
E-mail [email p o ec ed]
Recei ed 13 Decembe 2017 Re ised 29 Ma ch 2018 Accep ed 5 Ap il 2018
2
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938 · Hy önen e al. · Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en …
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
1 In oduc ion
Hyb id aspen (Populus × we s einii Häme -Ah i), a c oss be ween he na i e Eu opean aspen
(P. emula L.) and Ame ican aspen (P. emuloides Michx.), is conside ed o be he as es g owing
ee species in Finland (Hynynen 1999; Beuke e al. 2016). In he 1950s and 60s, hyb id aspen was
cul i a ed in Finland wi h he pu pose o g owing aw ma e ial o he ma ch indus y, bu wi h he
all o ma ch indus y in he ea ly 1970s in e es in aspen dec eased (Beuke 2000; Kä ki 2001). A
new b eeding p og amme wi h hyb id aspen was s a ed in Finland du ing he mid-1990s wi h he
aim o p oducing pulpwood (Beuke 2000). Indi idual hyb id aspen ees, supe io in g ow h and
quali y, we e selec ed pheno ypically om s ands and ials ha had been plan ed du ing he 1950s
and 60s. The selec ed ees we e ege a i ely p opaga ed h ough mic o-p opaga ion. Because o
he la ge a ia ion be ween he ees in succeeding in he p opaga ion p ocess, only clones ha had
a high a e o p opaga ion success we e selec ed o u he es ing in ield ials.
Fo pulpwood p oduc ion, he ecommenda ion is o plan abou 1200 hyb id aspen plan s
pe hec a e and g ow o 20 o 25 yea s wi hou hinning. A e clea cu ing, he nex gene a ion
can be es ablished om oo sucke s, which a e p oduced in abundance om he exis ing oo
sys em (McCa hy and Ry e 2015; Hy önen 2018). Dense, sp ou o igina ed hyb id aspen s ands
could also be g own o bioene gy applying much sho e o a ions han hose ecommended o
pulpwood (Tullus e al. 2012; Hy önen 2018). Ano he op ion would be a combina ion o sho
o a ion cul i a ion o bioene gy o pulpwood, ollowed by selec i e hinning, and p oduc ion o
la ge dimension ees o enee o sawn imbe (McCa hy and Ry e 2015).
Hyb id aspen g ows bes on e ile o es si es and o me ag icul u al land wi h good ae a-
ion and wa e condi ions (Lu e e al. 2017). A he mos sui able si es in Sou he n Finland he
yield o he i s o a ion s ands can be up o 20 m3 ha–1 pe yea in o a ions o a ound 20 yea s
(Beuke e al. 2016). G ow h o he second o a ion is expec ed o be e en be e due o highe s and
densi y and igo ous ini ial g ow h o he coppice due o he exis ing oo sys em. Hyb id aspen
is e y suscep ible o damage by mammal he bi o es. He bi o e damage may no only a ec he
su i al and g ow h a e o he plan a ions, bu also has a majo e ec on s em and wood quali y.
The plan a ions should be enced agains moose and he indi idual ees p o ec ed agains oles
and ha es. Failu es o ea lie hyb id aspen plan a ions we e mainly due o unsui able o igin o he
plan ing ma e ial, unsui able si e condi ions, as well as poo managemen a es ablishmen phase
and seedling s age o damage by b owsing mammals (Vihe ä-Aa nio 1999).
The p ope ies o he biomass eeds ock can be de e mined by a ious cha ac e is ics,
depending on he end use. Wood densi y is conside ed o be one o he mos impo an quali y
ai s o he use ulness o imbe , as a high densi y has a posi i e e ec on mos o he mechanical
s eng h p ope ies (He äjä i 2004a,b). Na i e Eu opean aspen is known o ha e se e al a ou able
p ope ies ega ding mechanical p ocessing (Söy ilä 1992; He äjä i e al. 2006), bu s udies on
he co esponding p ope ies o hyb id aspen a e limi ed (He äjä i e al. 2006; He äjä i 2009).
Ene gy yield, measu ed as hea ing alue, is one o he mos impo an wood quali y cha ac e is ics
o ene gy plan a ions (Kenney e al. 1990). The ash con en o biomass is known o a y be ween
ee species and ee componen s (Hakkila and Kalaja 1983; Voipio and Laakso 1992; Hy önen
and Nu mi 2015). High wood densi y en ails a highe hea ing alue pe olume, whe eas high
ash con en dec eases he hea ing alue o biomass (Sheng and Aze edo 2005). In addi ion, high
amoun s o ash can also a ec he clogging o he ash handling mechanisms o powe plan s and
may lead o highe cleaning and main enance equi emen s o he boile s (Niu e al. 2016).
In o de o know i wood quali y ai s can be imp o ed h ough he b eeding and selec ion
o supe io hyb id aspen clones, mo e knowledge is needed abou he gene ic a ia ion as well as
he wi hin- ee a ia ion o hose ai s.
3
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938 · Hy önen e al. · Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en …
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
The main objec i e o his s udy was o de e mine he clonal a ia ion o ash and mois u e
con en , basic densi y and hea ing alue among se en selec ed hyb id aspen clones g owing on
o me ag icul u al land in sou he n Finland. In addi ion, we examined he a ia ion o hose ai s
wi hin he ees be ween wood, ba k and b anches, as well as he e ical a ia ion o wood and
ba k.
2 Ma e ial and me hods
2.1 Field ial and clones
The ma e ial o his s udy was ob ained om a hyb id aspen clonal ial in U jala, sou he n Finland
(61°00´N, 23°29´E) ha was es ablished in sp ing 1998. The ial included 25 mic o p opaga ed
hyb id aspen clones. The clones o igina ed om ees ha had been selec ed pheno ypically om
s ands and ials ha we e es ablished in sou he n and cen al Finland du ing he 1950s and 1960s.
The selec ed ees we e supe io in g ow h, had good s em quali y (s aigh wi h ew b anches) and
showed no signs o diseases. The one-yea -old con aine ized hyb id aspen plan s we e g own in he
Haapas ensy jä nu se y o he Fo es Resea ch Ins i u e. The expe imen al layou was a andomized
comple e block design wi h i e eplica es and en ees pe plo ( wo ows o i e ees pe clone
pe plo wi h a spacing o 2 m (wi hin ows) × 4 m (be ween ows)). The ial was es ablished on a
o me ag icul u al ield wi h a sandy clay soil. Be o e plan ing, he soil was p epa ed by plough-
ing. No weed con ol was ca ied ou be o e o a e plan ing. The si e was enced agains moose
and each indi idual ee was p o ec ed agains oles and ha es by a 50 cm high Tubex ube.
Fo his s udy, se en hyb id aspen clones we e selec ed by pheno ype (Table 1). The selec ed
clones we e amongs he en bes clones o heigh g ow h in he ial. Howe e , because in his
s udy he o al ee biomass was s udied, in addi ion o g ow h he clones we e also selec ed o be
di e en in b anching in ensi y, based on ex e io obse a ion. The sha e o b anches om o al
mass in he clones o hyb id aspen a ied om 30 o 43%, he mean being 34%.
Table 1. The hyb id aspen clones included in he s udy, he loca ion o he s and hey we e selec ed om and he o igin
o hei pa en s, as accu a ely as could be eco e ed om he old documen s.
Clone Loca ion o
selec ion
La i ude Longi ude Mo he
species
O igin o he
mo he
Fa he
species
O igin o he
a he
7Vih i 60°20´ 24°26´ Populus
emula
Tuusula,
Finland
Populus
emuloides
Aleza Lake,
Ca iboo, BC, Canada
14 Lapinjä i 60°37´ 26°11´ Populus
emula
Toi akka,
Finland
Populus
emuloides
Maple, On a io,
Canada
20 Nu mijä i 60°30´ 24°42´ Populus
emuloides
Aleza Lake,
Ca iboo, BC, Canada
Populus
emula Finland
21 Vih i 60°20´ 24°26´ Populus
emula
Helsinki,
Finland
Populus
emuloides
Gal , On a io,
Canada
24 Vaajakoski 62°15´ 25°54´ Populus
emula
Tuusula,
Finland
Populus
emuloides
Maple, On a io,
Canada
26 Vaajakoski 62°15´ 25°54´ Populus
emuloides
Go henbu g bo anical
ga den, Sweden
Populus
emula
Tuusula,
Finland
27 Loppi 60°37´ 24°27´ Populus
emula
Punkaha ju,
Finland
Populus
emuloides Canada
4
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938 · Hy önen e al. · Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en …
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
2.2 Field measu emen s and sample collec ion
One ee pe clone was selec ed a andom om each block ( o al i e ees/clone) and ha es ed
du ing win e (Decembe –Janua y) a e 12 g owing seasons. Howe e , due o mo ali y, wo ees
o clone 21 had o be aken om block 1 and wo ees o clone 27 om blocks 1 and 4. A e
elling, heigh (dm) and diame e a b eas heigh (DBH, cm) o each ee we e measu ed. The
ees we e delimbed and he b anches o each ee we e collec ed, weighed and bundled. A sample
consis ing o 10 cm sec ions om op, middle and base sec ions o each b anch bundle was aken
o analysis. F om he s em, 5 o 6-cm- hick sample discs we e sawn a a heigh o 0.6 m, 1.3 m
and 2 m om he s ump and om he e on e e y wo me es o he op o each ee. Only wo ees
we e all enough o be sampled a 12 me es heigh . Because he e we e only wo 12 m samples
hey we e excluded om he da a. All samples we e ma ked ( ee numbe , sampling heigh ) and
packed in plas ic bags.
2.3 Assessmen o ash and mois u e con en , basic densi y and hea ing alue
In he labo a o y, he diame e wi h and wi hou ba k o each disc was measu ed in wo di ec ions
pe pendicula ly. Subsequen ly, he s em sample discs we e di ided ho izon ally in o wo discs
(2.5–3 cm in hickness). O hese, one disc was used o de e mining basic densi y using he wa e
eplacemen me hod (Olesen 1971). A e measu ing he o al olume wi h ba k o hese discs,
hey we e deba ked (ou e and inne ba k) and e-measu ed o ob ain he olume o wood. The
olume o ba k was calcula ed on he basis o hese wo measu emen s. Then, he ba k and wood
samples we e d ied a +105 °C o cons an weigh and weighed, and mois u e con en and basic
densi y calcula ed sepa a ely o wood and ba k. One basic densi y measu emen o ba k was
omi ed om he analysis due o a measu emen e o .
The o he disc hal es, as well as he b anch sample, we e used o analysing he ash con en
and hea ing alue o wood, ba k and b anches. These sample discs we e deba ked ca e ully. Then
he wood and ba k samples om all disks belonging o one and he same ee we e uni ed o o m
one wood and one ba k sample pe ee, d ied a +70 °C o cons an weigh and milled.
Calo i ic hea ing alue (qp(g oss)) was de e mined wi h an IKA C 500 calo ime e . In o de
o calcula e he e ec i e (qp(ne )), lowe , ne calo i ic alue on a d y basis) hea ing alue i is
necessa y o known he hyd ogen con en o he compa men s, since he hea o condensa ion o
wa e apou c ea ed du ing combus ion has o be aken in o accoun . The hyd ogen concen a ions
used we e ob ained om Nu mi (1997) and o b anches and ba k hey we e calcula ed as means
om igu es p esen ing alues o di e en sized b anches and inne and ou e ba k (s em 6.32%,
b anches 6.07%, ba k 6.23%). The ollowing o mula was used in he calcula ion (see Alakangas
e al. 2016):
qp(ne ) = qp(g oss) – 212.2 × w(H)d – 0.8 × [w(O)d + w(N)d]
qp(ne ) = ne calo i ic alue on a d y basis a cons an p essu e, kJ kg–1
qp(g oss) = g oss (e ec i e) calo i ic alue on a d y basis, kJ kg–1
w(H)d = hyd ogen con en in d y bio uel, %
w(O)d = oxygen con en in d y uel, %
w(N)d = ni ogen con en in d y uel, %
Fo w(O)d + w(N)d de aul alue o 41% was used (Alakangas e al. 2016). Ash con en o
he samples was de e mined by ashing he samples a 550 °C o 8 hou s.
5
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938 · Hy önen e al. · Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en …
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
2.4 S a is ical analyses
The basic densi y and mois u e con en o s em wood, s em ba k and he whole s em (wood plus
ba k) o each ee was calcula ed as a mean weighed by diame e squa ed a each measu emen
poin a di e en heigh s. The clonal di e ences in he wood, ba k and s em basic densi y, mois u e
con en , hea ing alue and ash con en we e es ed wi h mixed linea models wi h he clone as ixed
e ec , eplica ion as andom e ec and ee heigh as co a ia e. The clonal means we e compa ed
using S uden ’s LSD es a signi icance le el p < 0.05. The e ec o clone and sampling heigh
on basic densi y and mois u e con en o wood, ba k and s em was es ed wi h epea ed measu es
analysis o a iance, whe e sampling heigh was used as a wi hin-subjec a iable. Due o se e al
ees being sho e han 10 m, he analysis was con ined o 8 m o heigh . When in he epea ed
ANOVA models Mauchly’s es indica ed ha he assump ion o sphe ici y had been iola ed, he
deg ees o eedom we e co ec ed using G eenhouse-Geisse es ima es o sphe ici y. When es -
ing igu es in pe cen age e ms, a iance s abilizing ans o ma ions o squa e oo a csine was
used. The pai wise linea dependences be ween he s udied ai s we e examined wi h Pea son’s
linea co ela ion coe icien s calcula ed on he clonal means. All analyses we e done using he
IBM SPSS 22.0 p og amme.
3 Resul s
3.1 T ee heigh and diame e
The mean heigh o all ees was 10.6 m and hei DBH 10.8 cm (Fig. 1). The e we e signi ican
di e ences in he heigh o he clones, bu no in hei DBH.
3.2 P opo ion o wood and ba k
The clones di e ed in wood (and ba k) ac ion in he s ems (Fig. 2). The amoun o wood in he
hyb id aspen s ems was on a e age 84.9%, wi h a ange o 8 pe cen age poin s be ween clones.
The wood ac ion o he s em biomass emained qui e cons an un il up o 6 m heigh a e which
i s a ed o dec ease (Fig. 2). The dec ease o he wood ac ion owa ds he op o he ee was
signi ican . The e was also a signi ican sampling heigh × clone in e ac ion o he ac ion o s em
Fig. 1. Mean heigh (A) and DBH (B) o he s udied hyb id aspen
clones. Ba s indica e s anda d e o . Clones ma ked wi h he same le -
e s do no di e om each o he a he 0.05 signi icance le el.

6
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938 · Hy önen e al. · Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en …
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
wood. Fo clonal means he e was a s ong posi i e co ela ion ( = 0.883, p = 0.008) be ween ee
heigh and he p opo ion o wood in he s ems.
3.3 Ash con en
The ash con en was lowes in hyb id aspen wood wi h a mean alue o all clones o 0.45%. The e
we e clonal di e ences in ash con en o he wood (Fig. 3). Clone 21 had he lowes ash con en
(0.40%) and clone 26 he highes (0.49%). Ash con en o he ba k was almos 10 imes highe
han ha o he wood (mean o all clones 3.9%). Clone 20 had excep ionally low ash con en in
he ba k compa ed o o he clones (Fig. 3). The ash con en o he b anches (mean o all clones
2.4%) was in e media e o ha o he wood and ba k. Ash con en o he wood and ba k did no
co ela e signi ican ly wi h he size o he ees (DBH, H). Howe e , because he ash con en o
he ba k was much highe han ha o he wood, he ash con en o b anches co ela ed nega i ely
wi h DBH ( = –0.475, p = 0.004) and H ( = –0.358, p = 0.035). Bigge ees had bigge b anches and
hus ela i ely less ash ich ba k in he b anches. When calcula ed on clonal means, no signi ican
co ela ion was ound be ween he ash con en o wood and ash con en o ba k.
Fig. 3. The mean ash con en o wood (A), ba k (B) and b anches (C) in hyb id aspen clones. Lines inside ba s indica e
s anda d e o . T ee heigh was used as a co a ia e. Clones ma ked wi h he same le e s do no di e om each o he
a he 0.05 signi icance le el.
Fig. 2. The mean wood ac ion o he o al s em biomass (A) and he wood
ac ions o s em biomass a di e en sample heigh s (B) in he s udied hyb id
aspen clones. T ee heigh was used as co a ia e. Clones ma ked wi h he same
le e s do no di e om each o he a he 0.05 signi icance le el.
7
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938 · Hy önen e al. · Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en …
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
3.4 Mois u e con en
The mois u e con en o he hyb id aspen clones was highes in he wood (on a e age 54.9%),
lowes in he ba k (48.9%) and in e media e in he b anches (50.1%) (Fig. 4). The a e age mois u e
con en o he whole s em wi hou b anches (54.3%) was only sligh ly lowe han ha o he wood
ac ion due o he small sha e o ba k o he o al s em biomass. The e we e signi ican clonal
di e ences in he mois u e con en o wood, ba k, s em as well as b anches. Fo wood mois u e
con en he co a ia e (heigh ) was signi ican indica ing ha bigge ees had lowe mois u e con-
en . No signi ican co ela ion was ound be ween he mois u e o wood and mois u e o ba k,
when calcula ed on clonal means.
The e ec o sampling heigh on wood, ba k and s em mois u e con en s was signi ican
(Fig. 5). Howe e , wood and ba k mois u e con en s changed di e en ly in he e ical di ec ion.
The mois u e con en o wood was lowes a he base o he s em and inc eased in a e ical di ec-
ion eaching i s maximum a 2–4 m heigh , hen g adually dec easing u he upwa ds and in mos
o he clones eaching i s minimum a op o he ees (Fig. 5). The ba k mois u e con en was
lowes a he base o he s em and inc eased consis en ly owa ds he op o he ee. The mois u e
o s em (wood and ba k) was lowes a he s em base. Howe e , e ical changes in s em mois u e
we e smalle han hose obse ed in wood and ba k since he mois u e o he wood was low and
ha o ba k high a he op o he s ems. The e we e signi ican clonal di e ences in he mois u e
con en o he wood, ba k and s em. The clone × sampling heigh in e ac ion was signi ican o
wood and s em mois u e con en indica ing ha he s udied clones had di e en mois u e con en
a di e en heigh s.
Fig.4. The mean mois u e con en o wood (A), ba k (B), s em (wood and ba k)
(C) and b anches (D) o he s udied hyb id aspen clones. T ee heigh was used
as co a ia e. Clones ma ked wi h he same le e s do no di e om each o he
a he 0.05 signi icance le el.
8
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938 · Hy önen e al. · Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en …
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
3.5 Basic densi y
The a e age basic densi y o wood o all clones was 378 kg m–3 and ha o ba k 450 kg m–3. The e
we e signi ican clonal di e ences in basic densi y bo h o wood and ba k (Fig. 6). The di e ence
be ween he clones wi h he highes and lowes basic densi y o wood and ba k was 44 kg m–3
and 91 kg m–3, espec i ely. Co ela ion be ween he densi y o wood and densi y o ba k was no
signi ican , when calcula ed on he clonal means. Fo clonal means he e was, howe e , a s ong
nega i e co ela ion be ween ee heigh and densi y o wood ( = –0.796, p = 0.032), as well as
be ween heigh and densi y o s em ( = –0.832, p = 0.020).
The e ec o sampling heigh on wood, ba k and s em basic densi y was signi ican (Fig. 7).
The basic densi y o hyb id aspen clones dec eased om he base o he s em up o 4–6 m heigh ,
bu inc eased again u he upwa ds owa d he op o he ee (Fig. 7). The clonal a ia ion was
signi ican as was he clone × sampling heigh in e ac ion. Clone 24 had a he lowe pa s o he
s em excep ionally low basic densi y (Fig. 7). The a ia ion in basic densi y o ba k was highe
han ha o wood. Basic densi y o ba k was highes close o he g ound and gene ally dec eased
up o 4 m, sligh ly inc easing again owa ds he op o he ees.
Fig. 5. The mean mois u e con en o wood (A), ba k (B), and s em (wood and ba k) (C) o he s udied hyb id aspen
clones a di e en sampling heigh s.
Fig. 6. The mean basic densi y o wood (A), ba k (B) and s em (wood and ba k) (C) o he s udied hyb id aspen clones.
S anda d e o o he mean. T ee heigh was used as co a ia e. Clones ma ked wi h he same le e s do no di e om
each o he a he 0.05 signi icance le el.
9
Sil a Fennica ol. 52 no. 2 a icle id 9938 · Hy önen e al. · Clonal a ia ion in basic densi y, mois u e con en …
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
3.6 Hea ing alue
Analysis o co a iance showed clonal di e ences in he e ec i e hea ing alue o bo h s em
wood and s em ba k o hyb id aspen clones (Fig. 8). Fo wood, also he co a ia e ( ee heigh )
was signi ican . Howe e , he e we e no signi ican di e ences in he e ec i e hea ing alue o
he b anches o he di e en clones. The e ec i e hea ing alue o wood was lowe han ha o
ba k, and ha o b anches was in e media e. The a e age e ec i e hea ing alue o wood was
18.264 MJ kg–1, ba k 19.239 MJ kg–1 and ha o b anches 18.747 MJ kg–1. The di e ence in hea -
Fig. 7. Mean basic densi y o wood (A), ba k (B), and s em (wood and ba k) (C) o he s udied hyb id aspen clones a
di e en sampling heigh s.
Fig. 8. The mean e ec i e hea ing alue o o en d y biomass o wood (A), ba k
(B), b anches (C) and s em (wood and ba k) (D) o hyb id aspen clones. T ee
heigh was used as co a ia e.