scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

The main church of Dadivank and the metropolitan architectural ideas

Abstract

Das wissenschaftliche Interesse an der Architektur, den Reliefs und den Wandmalereien des Klosters Dadivank in der Provinz Arzach im mittelalterlichen…

Read accessible full text

The main church of Dadivank and the metropolitan architectural ideas

Author: Kazaryan, Armen
Year: 2024
DOI: 10.38072/978-3-928794-95-4/p24
Source: https://macau.uni-kiel.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/macau_derivate_00005689/kiel-up_978-3-928794-95-4_p24.pdf
| 491
A men Kaza yan
The main chu ch o Dadi ank and
he me opoli an a chi ec u al ideas
1
Abs ac
The schola ly in e es in he a chi ec u e, elie s, and mu als o he monas e y o Dadi ank in he A sakh
p o ince o he medie al A menia mani es ed i sel in ecen yea s in he cou se o he conse a ion and
es o a ion wo ks ca ied ou on i and in he ollowing esea ch. The main chu ch, S . As a sa sin o
Ca hoghike, ha is he Ca hed al, acco ding o he insc ip ion, was buil in 1214 by A zu
Kha un, he wi e
o Vakh ang, P ince and so e eign o Ha e k and all o Ve in Khachen. Despi e Dadi ank’s
dis an loca ion
om he medie al A menian capi al Ani, he s udy assumes ha i s ex e nal image was c ea ed in acco -
dance wi h he image o he Ani ca hed al. Mo eo e , we do no know o any o he buildings embodying
he same idea be o e Dadi ank’s Ca hoghike was buil . This main conclusion has been demons a ed
by he esul s o an analysis o wo peculia i ies o he Dadi ank chu ch, which seem e y impo an
o he unde s anding o i s image: 1) he blind a cade on he main body, wi h only one colonne e
and wi h speci ic p o ile o he a chi ol s; 2) ose es in he ields o he a chi ol s o he a cade o he
d um. Also, he s udy has an impo an meaning o clea ly unde s anding he o iginal iew o he Ani
ca hed al and i s ole in he de elopmen o he 13 h-cen u y A menian a chi ec u e.
1. In oduc ion
Among nume ous medie al monas ic ensembles o A sakh, Dadi ank (o Khu a ank) is
one o he mos in e es ing wi h ega d o i s complica ed s uc u e as well as o i s beau i ul
a angemen in a moun ain landscape. Se e al imp essi e cons uc ions o he monas e y
we e buil mos ly du ing he 13 h cen u y wi h di e en pu poses and a ious olume ic
and spa ial solu ions (Fig. 1). O hese, he e a e unique s uc u es, such as 4-column cons-
uc ions: he so-called › emple‹ and he ga i , as well as an unusually shaped bell owe ,
1 The s udy has been ealized by he g an o he Russian Science Founda ion, p ojec no. 22-18-00354, in he Na ional
Resea ch Moscow S a e Uni e si y o Ci il Enginee ing (NRU MGSU). Topic: »The A chi ec u e and monumen al a
o Ani as a phenomenon o wo ld a is ic cul u e. Making o he me opoli an school o A menian a chi ec u e o he
10 h-14 h cen u ies.«
Kiel-UP • h ps://doi.o g/10.38072/978-3-928794-95-4/p24
492 | Das kul u elle E be on A zach | Արցախի մշակութային ժառանգությունը
in o which wo high khachka s — unsu passed in beau y and designed in he monas e y in
1283 — we e inse ed.2 Acco ding o he legend he g a e o S . Dadi, a disciple o Apos le
Thaddeus, one o he se en y disciples o Ch is is loca ed he e in Dadi ank.
The main chu ch, S . As a sa sin o Ca hoghike, ha is he ca hed al, was buil a he
ime when he monas e y uni ed a small numbe o buildings. An insc ip ion ca ed on i s
sou he n açade s a es ha , in 1214,
»A zu Kha un, a daugh e o he P ince o P inces o Ku d, and he wi e o Vakh ang, P ince and
so e eign o Ha e k and all o Ve in Khachen, buil his ca hed al wi h he g ea hope on he
es ing place o he sel and he sons [...] (one o whom ›died in he wa agains he Tu ks‹)«.3
The building is o he common ype o domed monas ic chu ches, c uci o m inside and
ec angula om he ou side. In he co ne zones, he e a e addi ional came as in wo ie s,
mos o which se ed as chapels (Fig. 2).
The size o he chu ch is small, 12.3 by 10.6 m on he g ound plan, bu he o ms a e
monumen al and, a he same ime, he e a e elegan de ails, ollowing he g ea examples
o deco a ion o he açades and he d um wi h a blind a cade. The o namen a ion and all
he shapes o he building a e made wi h ease, he au ho s wen baldly om he ypical
p opo ions o he samples o cen al egions o A menia; he cons uc ion imp esses wi h i s
pic u esque mason y, polych ome in places — he chess in scheme o wi h inse s o a ches
and columns made wi h s one o a colou ha di e s om i s backg ound (Fig. 3). We do
no need o gi e a de ailed desc ip ion o he ea u es o he Dadi ank Ca hoghike he e, as
such p esen a ions a e exis ing in p e ious publica ions dedica ed o he a chi ec u e and
conse a ion wo ks on he chu ch.4 The main goal o his s udy is he unco e ing o he
o igin o i s a chi ec u e in he pa o he a chi ec u al idea.
2 Paolo Cuneo, A chi e u a A mena dal qua o al dicianno esimo secolo / Con es i e con ibu e di T. B eccia F a adocchi,
M. Has a ’yan, M. A. Lala Comneno, A. Za ian, ol. 1–2. Roma: De Luca Edi o e, 1988, 450–455, no. 245; Shahen Mk chy-
an Историко-архитектурные памятники Нагорного Карабаха (Is o iko-a khi ek u nye pamia niki Nago nogo Ka abakha)
(His o ical-Cul u al Monumen s o Nago no-Ka abakh). Second ed. Ye e an: Pa be akan 1989, 34–39; Mu ad Has a ian.
Հայկական ճարտարապետության Արցախի դպրոցը (A sakh School o A menian A chi ec u e). Ye e an: A men-
ian Academy o Sciencies, 1992, 43–61; Sam el Ka ape yan Памятники армянской культуры в зоне Нагорного Карабаха
(Pamia niki a mianskoi kul u y zone Nago nogo Ka abakha) (Monumen s o A menian Cul u e in he Zone o Na-
go no-Ka abakh). Ye e an: RAA, 2000, 79–122; Sam el Ay azyan Դադի վանքի վերականգնումը 1997–2011 թթ. (Dadi
anki e akangnume 1997–2011 .) (The Res o a ion o he Monas e y o Dad (1997 o 2011)). Ye e an: RAA, 2015; A a
Za ian, Ch is ine Lamou eux La conse a ion- es au a ion des pein u es mu als da es 1297 dans l’eglise Ka hoghike-
Sain e-Me e-de-Dieu cons ui e en 1214. Ye e an: Tig an Me s, 2021 (in A menian and F ench), 51–91.
3 O iginal A menian insc ip ion has been published se e al imes (Դիվան հայ վիմագրության (Di an hai imag u ian)
(Co pus o A menian Insc ip ions), ol. 5: A sakh, ed. by Sed ak G. Ba khuda ian, Ye e an: Academy o Sciences o
A menian SSR, 1982, 198–199, no. 708; Sam el Ka ape yan (c . n. 2), 108–110, no. 1; A a Za ian/ Ch is ine Lamou eux
(c . n. 2) 94–95). I s ansla ions ha e been published also in Russian (Ka ape yan 2000, 106–107) and in F ench (Za ian,
Lamou eux 2021, 94–95).
4 Mu ad Has a ian (c . n. 2), 45–49; Babken Ulubabyan. Հայոց Արևելից կողմանց եկեղեցին և մշակույթը (Haio s A e-
eli s koghman s ekeghe sin e mshakui e) (The Chu ch and Cul u e o he A menian Eas e n Sides). Ye e an: Tig an
Me s, 1998, 368–374; Sam el Ay azyan (c . n. 2), 28–37; A a Za ian/ Ch is ine Lamou eux (c . n. 2), 93–111.
Kaza yan: The main chu ch o Dadi ank and he me opoli an a chi ec u al ideas | 493
The in e es in he a chi ec u e o his chu ch and in s udying he o igin o i s a chi ec u e
ge s bigge . Mo eo e , in he las couple o yea s, he Udins’ communi y o Aze baijan, wi h
he suppo o he au ho i ies o ha coun y, was ying o claim i s igh s, as supposedly he
hei s o all pa s o Agh ank (Caucasian Albania), o he Ch is ian sh ines o A sakh. Ea lie ,
Aze baijani schola s sys ema ically engaged in he ›Albanianiza ion‹ o he A menian he i age
o Nago no-Ka abakh, om ime o ime ecei ing a ebu om hei colleagues om o he
coun ies. The solu ion o he p oblem p esen ed in my a icle should clea ly e eal he com-
ple e inconsis ency o such pseudo-scien i ic poli ical claims. I am o do his solely by means
o an a chi ec u al analysis o his monumen in he con ex o A menian a chi ec u e
.
Mo eo e , he schola ly in e es in he a chi ec u e, elie s, and mu als o he Dadi ank
Chu ch mani es ed i sel in ecen yea s in he cou se o he conse a ion and es o a ion
wo ks ca ied ou he e and in he ollowing esea ch. In 2001–2005, he chu ch was es-
o ed; he esul s o hose wo ks we e co e ed in he a icles and a book by he a chi ec
Fig. 1: Dadi ank. Main iew o he monas e y om no h-wes . Pho o by A. Kaza yan (2012). All igh s ese ed.
494 | Das kul u elle E be on A zach | Արցախի մշակութային ժառանգությունը
Fig. 2: Dadi ank. G ound
plan and sou he n
açade, measu emen s. D awing used
ma e ials om: Ay azyan 2015, 95; Za ian,
Lamou eux 2021, ig. 87.
Kaza yan: The main chu ch o Dadi ank and he me opoli an a chi ec u al ideas | 495
Sam el Ay azyan.5 In 2014–2017, he mu als ha we e concen a ed on he no he n and
sou he n walls o he inne space we e ully disco e ed and clea ed by A a Za ian and
Ch is ine Lamou eux.6 Bo h o hese books, he main pu pose o which was o p esen he
a chaeological and conse a ion wo k on he si e, con ain sec ions desc ibing and analyzing
he a chi ec u al ea u es o he Dadi ank Chu ch.
5 Sam el Ay azyan (c . n. 2).
6 A a Za ian/ Ch is ine Lamou eux (c . n. 2).
Fig. 3: Dadi ank. Ca hoghike Chu ch. View om no h-eas . Pho o by A. Kaza yan (2012).
All igh s ese ed.

496 | Das kul u elle E be on A zach | Արցախի մշակութային ժառանգությունը
2. The image o Dadi ank Ca hoghike in he con ex
o he A menian monas ic chu ches o he Zaka id Pe iod
In he con ex o he Khachen Kingdom, he a chi ec u e and deco a ion o he Dadi ank
chu ch can only compe e wi h he ca hed al o S . John he Bap is o he Gandzasa Mo-
nas e y o 1216–1238, magni icen in o ms and elie s. These wo chu ches we e buil by
he same kind o a chi ec u al ype, and in some deco a i e shapes hey a e con enien . The
acades o bo h a e deco a ed by a blind a cade, in which iangula niches a e insc ibed.
Relie s ep esen ing he dono s wi h he models o chu ches (k i o elie s) a e inse ed in
hei walls. Bu p opo ions o he g ound plans and se e al a chi ec u al o ms, as well as
he s ylis ic ea u es a e di e en . The las obse a ion b ings me o he opinion ha bo h
chu ches canno be buil by he same a chi ec o same builde s.7
Mo eo e , he Dadi ank chu ch was buil ea lie han he one in Gandzasa ; and i inc eases
he possibili y ha he momen o i s c ea ion was he s a ing poin o a chi ec u e and monu-
men al a s syn hesis on he e i o y o A sakh, whe e his p inciple was implemen ed in a ull
scale. A e all, i is in ha chu ch ha he majes ic a chi ec u al o ms we e en iched wi h e-
lie s and o namen s, lapida y insc ip ions, polych ome mason y, açade colou ing, and in e io
pain ings. Many o hese peculia i ies a e cha ac e is ic o bo h A menian a chi ec u e in gene al
and especially i s A sakh school. I can be assumed ha he Dadi ank chu ch lay a he oo s o
ha school o o i s adical ans o ma ion in he beginning o he 13 h cen u y.
The e is a logical ques ion: has scien i ic esea ch de e mined he place o his chu ch in
he de elopmen o he a chi ec u e o A sakh and, in gene al, o whole A menia? I seems
ha i has no . I need o men ion only one a emp o sea ching o he sou ces o Dadi ank’s
Ca hoghike a chi ec u e. Basing hei heo y on he ole o bishop Ho hannes, he abbo o
Haghba Monas e y and a ela i e o A zu Kha un, he schola s Mes op Magis os and Bag a
Ulubabyan sugges ed he Su b Nshan chu ch o Haghba (972) as a p o o ype o he chu ch
o Dadi ank. This e sion has been analyzed and mainly denied in he la es book abou he
chu ch’s a chi ec u e and mu al pain ing.8
My own esea ch is de o ed o he disclosu e o his issue, which connec s he a chi ec u-
al image o he Dadi ank chu ch wi h he ideas ha we e bo n in Ani, he capi al o A menia
in he Bag a id ime a he end o he 10 h cen u y, which u ned ou o be popula again om
he end o he 12 h cen u y.
Be o e p esen ing he e sion o he o igin o he a chi ec u e o his chu ch, I will pay
a en ion o he eason o all he di icul ies in inding he o igins and › amily ies‹ o me-
die al a chi ec u al s uc u es, which especially applies o he his o iog aphy o A menian
7 Mu ad Has a ian (c . n. 2), 44–45.
8 A a Za ian/ Ch is ine Lamou eux (c . n. 2), 94–96.
Kaza yan: The main chu ch o Dadi ank and he me opoli an a chi ec u al ideas | 497
a chi ec u e, whe e he me hod o ypological analysis is dominan .9 The me hod was de-
eloped in he 20 h cen u y, in he a mosphe e o longing o unc ionalism and o malis -
a ionalis ends in a chi ec u e. Ce ainly, medie al cus ome s and a chi ec s had simila
conside a ions, bu no on he o eg ound. Fo he mos pa , hey could hink in images,
especially when hey planned ex ao dina y buildings, and he u ili y was no he only ea-
son o hei c ea ion. The main monas ic chu ches, ca hed als as a ule, we e e ec ed on
he ini ia i e o p ominen ep esen a i es o secula and spi i ual au ho i ies; in he a chi-
ec u al design, he ideas de e mining he image y o he wo k p e ailed. The e o e, i we
wan o un a el he idea gi en o he a chi ec o de eloped as a esul o his join c ea i i y
wi h he cus ome , i is necessa y o comp ehend p ecisely he image y cha ac e is ics o he
comple ed building.
Wha do we ha e in he case o he ca hed al buil by P incess A zu Kha un? This is a
cen ic chu ch, almos squa e on i s base, wi h a high dome and a blind a cade enci cling
bo h he main olume and he d um. Two models, depic ed in he dono elie s abo e he
sou he n and eas e n windows, co espond o such image (Fig. 4).
One o he nex wo models o chu ches, embodied in a sculp u al o m on he d um o
he Ca hed al o S . John he Bap is in Gandzasa , buil sho ly a e he Dadi ank chu ch, in
1216–1232, looks simila (Fig. 5). In he Gandzasa Ca hed al, he i e a cade ields on each
açade a e p esen ed jus like in Dadi ank. And bo h ca hed als belong o one and he same a -
chi ec u al ype, wi h came as in he co ne s. The e is, howe e , a di e ence: hei domed heads
a e o comple ely di e en ypes. In Dadi ank, he polyhed on o he d um is emphasized wi h
bundles o pilas e s, as i bea ing a wide zigzag co nice se ing as a basis o a plici o m umb el-
la-shape oo o he dome. The line o de elopmen o such monas ic ca hed als is well known,
om Ha i cha ank (1201) o Gandzasa , h ough h ee o ou decades o he 13 h cen u y. A
hei oo s, apa om he Ha i cha ank ca hed al, he e we e wo chu ches o Ani, buil du ing
he e i al o he A menian capi al unde Zaka e and I ane Mkha g dzeli o he Zaka yans. Bo h
o hem a e known o us om econs uc ions: he Bakh agek chu ch in he econs uc ion by
To os To amanian, and he chu ch in Akhchkabe d in Ani.10 The la e combines a blind a cade
wi h a olded oo . I can be seen as a sample o all such chu ches o Ca hoghike o Ma mashen
monas e y, 1029. Bu i is a comple ely di e en heme in A menian a chi ec u e, which was
mainly de eloped in pa allel.
Ne e heless, a chu ch wi h a blind a cade on he main olume and on he d um o ms a
e y ecognizable image in A menian a chi ec u e, mo e p ecisely, a ca hed al ype. I s sim-
9 A men Yu. Kaza yan, Церковная архитектура стран Закавказья VII века: формирование и развитие традиции (Tse ko naia a khi-
ek u a s an Zaka kaz’ia VII eka: o mi o anie i az i ie adi sii (Chu ch A chi ec u e o he 7 h Cen u y in T anscaucasian
Coun ies: Fo ma ion and De elopmen o he T adi ion), in 4 ols., ol. 1. Moscow: Locus S andi Publ., 2012 (in Russian), 52, 76–78.
10 A men Yu. Kaza yan, Новые данные о куполах храмов Ани. Часть вторая. Церковь во Внутренней крепости (No ye dan-
nye o kupolakh kh amo Ani. Chas ’ o aia. Tse ko ’ o Vnu ennei k epos i) (New da a on he domes o he Ani’s chu -
ches. Pa wo. The chu ch o he Inne o ess), in: Vop osy seobshchei is o ii a khi ek u y (Ques ions o he His o y
o Wo ld A chi ec u e), no. 13, 2019, 127–144.
498 | Das kul u elle E be on A zach | Արցախի մշակութային ժառանգությունը
Fig. 4: Dadi ank. K i o s elie on he sou he n açade. Pho o by A. Kaza yan (2012). All igh s ese ed.
Kaza yan: The main chu ch o Dadi ank and he me opoli an a chi ec u al ideas | 499
pli ied e sion is a composi ion wi h a blind a cade on a high d um only and, acco dingly,
wi h smoo h walls o he main olume. Such a e he chu ches o Gegha d (1215), Maka a-
ank (1198), he ecen ly es o ed chu ch o As a snkal (1244).
H
owe e , li e ally a yea a e he cons uc ion o he Dadi ank chu ch in Ani, on he
ini ia i e o he me chan Tig an Honen s, he monas ic chu ch o S . G igo Lusa o ich
(1215) was buil , which la e passed in o he use o he Chalcedonian communi y o he
ci y (Fig. 6, 7). This chu ch esembles he Ani Ca hed al, buil by he g ea a chi ec T da ,
on he o de o Shahinshah Smba Bag a uni and Queen Ka amide in he las hi d o he
10 h cen u y (Fig. 8, 9). I is he close p oximi y o hese wo chu ches ha lea es no doub
ha he plan o Tig an Honen s was o ep oduce he main idea o he ex e nal composi ion
o he Ani ca hed al, including i s non-p ese ed, bu heo e ical econs uc ed high dome
(Kaza yan 2018). A he same ime, he in e nal s uc u e and dimensions u ned ou o be
comple ely di e en , co esponding o he capabili ies o he cus ome and he unc ions o
he monas ic chu ch.
Fig. 5: Chu ch o he Gandzasa Monas e y, iew om sou h-eas . Pho o by A. Kaza yan
(2005). All igh s ese ed.
506 | Das kul u elle E be on A zach | Արցախի մշակութային ժառանգությունը
o hem unanimously e use depic ed ose es, appa en ly conside ing hem o be he esul
o he F ench esea che ’s an asy. Now we can sa ely suspec ha in he i s hal o he
19 h cen u y he e we e many mo e de ails o he collapsed dome, and among hem we e
agmen s o a d um, including ose es. In addi ion, he e a e some ose es on he a cade’s
ields on he d um o he chu ch o de ed by Honen s in Ani, o ien ed o he ca hed al. By
con as wi h Dadi ank, he d um o his chu ch has a ieze abo e he blind a cade. So, in a
ce ain sense, i is mo e ully a copy o he Ani ca hed al’s image. We may conclude ha he
a chi ec s o bo h o hese chu ches collec ed a numbe o de ails in o a common pa e n,
and de eloped hem o a speci ic s yle on i s own.
By he ime o cons uc ion o he chu ch o de ed by Honen s in Ani, he Dadi ank
chu ch had been al eady ounded. Despi e i s a dis ance om Ani, we ha e e e y igh o
assume ha i s ex e nal image was c ea ed in acco dance wi h he image o he Ani ca he-
d al. Mo eo e , we do no know o any o he buildings embodying he same idea — espe-
cially hose which could be da ed back o he ime be o e 1214. The only excep ion could
Fig. 13: Ani Ca hed al. F agmen o he blind
a cade o he sou he n açade. Pho o by
A. Kaza yan (2017). All igh s ese ed.

Kaza yan: The main chu ch o Dadi ank and he me opoli an a chi ec u al ideas | 507
be he s one model, disco e ed in Ani du ing he exca a ions by he expedi ion o Nicholas
Ma in he ea ly 20 h cen u y. Bu i does no ha e an exac da e. No ewo hy, excep he
examples on he açades o he chu ches o Dadi ank and Gandzasa , he images o all o he
models — on he chu ches o Haghba , Sanahin, Hagha zin — do no con ain blind a cades
and hey a e much simple in gene al.
Simpli ica ion o he o iginal model, ci ing some o i s ea u es and igno ing o he s is a
cha ac e is ic app oach o medie al a chi ec u e. The e ha e ne e been li e al bo owings,
especially in cases o c ea ing a wo k o a much smalle scale. The e o e, such de ails as he
shape o he a cade’s elemen s, hei p opo ions, he absence o a ieze on he d um a he
Dadi ank chu ch look na u al. Especially, i we ake in o accoun he p o incial na u e o
he wo k o he a chi ec and mas e masons o Ca hoghike.
Ne e heless, his monumen con ains wo peculia i ies, which seem e y impo an o
his esea ch: 1) he blind a cade on he main body, wi h only one colonne e and wi h spe-
ci ic p o ile o he a chi ol s; 2) ose es in he ields o he a chi ol s o he a cade o he
d um, which, being an excep ionally a e ea u e, emind he ea lies econs uc ion o he
Ani ca hed al p oposed by Texie . I can be assumed ha , in he middle o he 19 h cen u y,
hose blocks s ill exis ed and se ed as he basis o such an unusual econs uc ion. I see-
med inc edible o e e yone, bu i was he d um o he Dadi ank Ca hoghike, ha made he
p oposal o he F ench esea che qui e easonable. The same allusion o he shaping o he
Ani Ca hed al is con ained in he ose es on he d um o he Honen s chu ch, bu wi h an
a bi a y a angemen o he ose es.
4. Conclusion
Thus, o he i s ime, pu ing o wa d a e sion abou he embodimen o he a chi ec u-
al idea o he Ani ca hed al in he Dadi ank chu ch, I ough o commen on he possible
easons o such e e ence o he Ani ca hed al by A zu Kha un o Bishop Ho hannes Kha-
chen si, who helped he wi h he cons uc ion. This main conclusion has been demons a-
ed by he esul s o an analysis o wo peculia i ies o he Dadi ank chu ch, which seem
e y impo an o he unde s anding o i s image: 1) he blind a cade on he main body,
wi h only one colonne e and wi h a speci ic p o ile o he a chi ol s; 2) ose es in he ields
o he a chi ol s o he a cade o he d um.
Mos likely, he main ask o hei decision was a he o ical e e ence o he g ea es wo k
o he A menian capi al in o de o ans e i s symbolic and meaning ul signi icance o he
land o Khachen, decla ing i s inalienabili y om he main na ional cen e . The s udy disco-
e ed he impo ance o Ani o he de elopmen o A menian a chi ec u e du ing he i s
decades o he 13 h cen u y, when ha amous cul u al and poli ical cen e o A menia also
played a majo ole in he eligious li e o he p o inces o he coun y.
508 | Das kul u elle E be on A zach | Արցախի մշակութային ժառանգությունը
I emains o ask he opponen s om Aze baijan: how can one alk abou ce ain Alba-
nian ea u es o he A menian chu ches o A sakh, i hei c ea o s openly decla ed hei
belonging o he single A menian Chu ch in he e y o ms o buildings. They decla ed i
much mo e openly han i happened in o he his o ically A menian p o inces.
Re e ences
Ay azyan, Sam el. Դադի վանքի վերականգնումը
1997–2011 թթ. (Dadi anki e akangnume 1997–2011
.) (The Res o a ion o he Monas e y o Dad (1997 o
2011)). Ye e an: RAA, 2015.
Cuneo, Paolo, A chi e u a A mena dal qua o al dician-
no esimo secolo / Con es i e con ibu e di T. B eccia
F a adocchi, M. Has a ’yan, M. A. Lala Comneno, A.
Za ian, ol. 1–2. Roma: De Luca Edi o e, 1988.
Դիվան հայ վիմագրության (Di an hai imag u ian)
(Co pus o A menian Insc ip ions), ol. 5: A sakh,
ed. by Sed ak G. Ba khuda ian, Ye e an: Academy o
Sciences o A menian SSR, 1982.
Has a ian, Mu ad. Հայկական ճարտարապետության
Արցախի դպրոցը (A sakh School o A menian A -
chi ec u e). Ye e an: A menian Academy o Scien-
cies, 1992, 44–45.
Ka ape yan, Sam el. Հայ մշակույթի հուշարձանները
Խորհրդային Ադրբեջանին բռնակցված
շրջաններում (Monumen s o A menian Cul u e
cap u ed by he So ie Aze baidjan). Ye e an: RAA,
1999.
Ka ape yan, Sam el. Памятники армянской культуры
в зоне Нагорного Карабаха (Pamia niki a mianskoi
kul u y zone Nago nogo Ka abakha) (Monumen s
o A menian Cul u e in he Zone o Nago no-Ka a-
bakh). Ye e an: RAA, 2000.
Kaza yan, A men Yu. Церковная архитектура стран
Закавказья VII века: формирование и развитие
традиции (Tse ko naia a khi ek u a s an Zaka -
kaz’ia VII eka: o mi o anie i az i ie adi sii
(Chu ch A chi ec u e o he 7 h Cen u y in T ans-
caucasian Coun ies: Fo ma ion and De elopmen o
he T adi ion), in 4 ols., ol. 1. Moscow: Locus S andi
Publ., 2012 (in Russian).
Kaza yan, A men Yu. Новые данные о куполах храмов
Ани. Часть первая. Кафедральный собор зодчего
Трдата (No ye dannye o kupolakh kh amo Ani.
Chas ’ pe aia. Ka ed al’nyi sobo zodchego T da-
a) (New da a on he cupolas o Ani’s chu ches. Pa
i s . The ca hed al by an a chi ec T da ), in: Vop o-
sy seobshchei is o ii a khi ek u y (Ques ions o he
His o y o Wo ld A chi ec u e), no. 10, 2018, 145–169
(in Russian).
Kaza yan, A men Yu. Новые данные о куполах храмов
Ани. Часть вторая. Церковь во Внутренней крепости
(No ye dannye o kupolakh kh amo Ani. Chas ’ o-
aia. Tse ko ’ o Vnu ennei k epos i) (New da a on
he domes o he Ani’s chu ches. Pa wo. The chu ch
o he Inne o ess), in: Vop osy seobshchei is o ii
a khi ek u y (Ques ions o he His o y o Wo ld A -
chi ec u e), no. 13, 2019, 127–144.
Mk chyan, Shahen. Историко-архитектурные
памятники Нагорного Карабаха (Is o iko-a khi ek u -
nye pamia niki Nago nogo Ka abakha) (His o ical-
Cul u al Monumen s o Nago no-Ka abakh). Second
ed. Ye e an: Pa be akan, 1989.
Texie , Cha les Félix Ma ie, Desc ip ion de l’A ménie e
de la Pe se, de la Mésopo amie, Pa is, 1842.
To amanian, To os. The Ca hed al Chu ch o Ani. Ye e-
an: Agency o his o ical-cul u al museums and he
p ese a ion o his o ical en i onmen Publ., 2008 (in
A menian, English and Russian).
Ulubabyan, Babken. Հայոց Արևելից կողմանց
եկեղեցին և մշակույթը (Haio s A e eli s kog-
hman s ekeghe sin e mshakui e) (The Chu ch and
Cul u e o he A menian Eas e n Sides). Ye e an:
Tig an Me s, 1998.
Za ian, A a, Lamou eux Ch is ine. La conse a ion- es-
au a ion des pein u es mu als da es 1297 dans l’eglise
Ka hoghike-Sain e-Me e-de-Dieu cons ui e en 1214.
Ye e an: Tig an Me s, 2021 (in A menian and F ench).
Kaza yan: The main chu ch o Dadi ank and he me opoli an a chi ec u al ideas | 509
Au ho
P o . D . A men Kaza yan
Moscow S a e Uni e si y o Ci il Enginee ing (MGSU), Na ional Resea ch Uni e si y, Ins i u e o A chi-
ec u e and U ban Planning, Moscow, Russia, a menkaza [email p o ec ed]
Open Access
This pape is published unde he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion–Sha eAlike 4.0 In e na ional license
(CC BY-SA 4.0). Please no e ha indi idual, app op ia ely ma ked pa s o he pape may be excluded om
he license men ioned o may be subjec o o he copy igh condi ions. I such hi d pa y ma e ial is no
unde he C ea i e Commons license, any copying, edi ing o public ep oduc ion is only pe mi ed wi h he
p io consen o he espec i e copy igh owne o on he basis o ele an legal au ho iza ion egula ions.