scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Iberian Spirantization and Continuant Spreading

Abstract

The spirantization of voiced obstruents in languages of the Iberian Peninsula is examined, especially for Catalan and Spanish. Phonologicai analyses based on the spreading of the feature [continuant] face serious problems and can be mantained only at the cost of empiricai inadequacy or postulation of ad hoc interpretation of principles or additional rules. It is proposed that these inadequacies stem from the phonologicai character of the anaiyses, and that a phonetic treatment of the aitemation gives more satisfactory results.

Read accessible full text

Iberian Spirantization and Continuant Spreading

Author: Mascaró, Joan
Publisher: Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Year: 1991
Source: https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/cwpil/1132256Xv1/1132256Xv1p167.pdf
Ibe ian Spi an iza ion and Con inuan Sp eading
Joan Masca 6
Uni e si a Au bnoma de Ba celona
The spi an iza ion o oiced obs uen s in languages o he Ibe ian Peninsula is
examineú, especially o Ca alan and Spanish. Phonologicai analyses based on he
sp eading o he ea u e [con inuan ] ace se ious p oblems and
can
be man ained only
a he cos o empi icai inadequacy o pos ula ion o ad hoc in e p e a ion o
p inciples o addi ional ules. I is p oposed ha hese inadequacies s em om he
phonologicai cha ac e o he anaiyses, and ha
a
phone ic ea men o he
ai ema ion gi es mo e sa is ac o y esul s
.
The al e na ion be ween he se ies o oiced s ops [b], [d], [g], and hei espec i e spi an
app oximan s [PI,
[a],
[y] shows a e y simila dis ibu ion in he Spanish, Ca alan, Basque,
and Po uguese dialec s o he Ibe ian Peninsula. Some a ie ies o hese languages show a
di e en dis ibu ion, ha may ha e o be analyzed in a di e en way; he e
I
will use he em
"Ibe ian spi an iza ion" o e e o he dis ibu ion o s ops and spi an s desc ibed below, which
is sha ed, acco ding o he a ailable li e a u e and o my own obse a ions, by mos Ibe ian
a ie ies.l The de e mina ion o he p ope na u e o his dis ibu ion is in e es ing no on
desc ip i e g ounds alone, bu also because o he con o e ed s a us o he ea u e
[con inuan ] in phonological heo y
2,
in pa icula wi h espec o i s ep esen a ional p ope ies
which depend on i s possibili y o sp eading.
The
aim
o his pape is somewha limi ed: he main goa1 is o de e mine wha he exac na u e
o he dis ibu ion is, i.e. o es ablish he co ec linguis ic gene aliza ion ha co e s he
dis ibu ion. Since as a as I can see mos cu en desc ip ions ely on alse assump ions (o
Ca alan
Wo king Pape s in Linguis ics (CWPL),
1991:
167- 179.
Uni e si a Au bnoma de Ba celona
else on e y simpli ied e idence), a e iew o he basic ac s migh p o e qui e use ul. Mo e
speci icaly,
I
will each wo conclusions: a he desc ip i e le el, ha he dis ibu ion is
go e ned by phone ic ac o s, and w. . . he heo y o phonology, ha , consequen ly, Ibe ian
spi an iza ion cases do no cons i u e a gumen s o a sp eading ea men o [con inuan ].
1.
The
basic ac s
Spanish can illus a e he basic ac s. Mos desc ip ions o s anda d Cas ilian Spanish
( ollowing Na a o Tomás (1971)) p esen he ollowing s a e o a ai s (which will be e ised
la e ):
Pos pausall y b
j6n
gana
des' d6n
'well' 'wins' 'dis-dain'
A e nasals Ambos 6nda
U'S
gA 0
'bo h' 'wa e' 'a ca '
A e la e als: o d ald6a
mA1
dla
'hamle ' 'bad day'
b.
[Pl.
[al, [yl
a e ocoids
6j
plno
blwaa
$xo
( owels, glides) ' he e's wine' 'widow'
'I
do'
a e ica i es dezplo dezae
a y
Ano
'de ou ' 'si nce' 'A ghan'
a e
ka p6n
be he
m8
y w6sa
'coa1
'
'g een' 'hea y sea'
A e la e als: o b, g
m
l
p
68
es
'a housand imes'
Alga
'seaweed'
As can
be
seen om he examples in (1) no all possible con ex s a e a es ed in Cas ilian
Spanish; in pa icula , he e a e no examples o
b,
d,
g,
a e obs uen s s ops. This is so
because no obs uen s ops appea syllable inally; in his posi ion hey a e no mally weakened
and spi an ized
(
68
pol, e c.).
These con ex s a e ound in Ca alan, howe e . This language shows he same dis ibu ion o
[b], [d], [g] s. [PI, [a], [y] as in (1) (see, e.g., Wheele (1979)). Bu , as opposed o
Spanish, obs uen s ops a e ound syllable inally, and in his con ex he noncon inuan
e sions [b], [d], [g] show up; no e ha he e is also eg essi e oicing assimila ion, hence no
[pb], [kd], e c.:
(2)
ubb51
'socce '
sClbdi
'subjec ', ' assal'
k
6b
g%
'no ca '
s69
b5
'I
am good'
ma egda
'eme ald'
p5
g
gds
'li le as e
2.
The s anda d gene aliza ion
Thus s anda d desc ip ions ha e lead some au ho s (Goldsmi h (1981), Masca ó (1983), Hanis
(1984,1985), Hualde (1988), Rome a (1990), Palmada (199 1)) o p opose ha spi an iza ion
can
be
cap u ed
by
he gene aliza ion in
(3).
(3)
Spi an
P,
8,
8
appea a e [+con inuan ] segmen s, s ops appea a e [-con inuan ]
segmen s and a e pause.
When leshed ou in some pa icula heo y,
(3)
akes he o n o se e a1 a ian s, depending
on whe he only
P,
8,
).j,
(Hanis (1984)) only
b, d,
9,
(Hualde (1988)) o bo h (Lozano
(1979), Masca 6 (1983), Hams (1985), Palmada (1991)) a e de i ed by ule. In he amewo k
o au osegmen al phonology (3) has de e mined, as can be expec ed, he p oposa1 o a
sp eading ule ha associa es delinked o unspeci ied
b,
d,
g
o he [con ] alue o he
p eceding segmen ; in hose cases in whch no sp eading akes place, he unma ked [con ] alue
is assigned no mally by de aul .
The basic p oblem aced by analyses based on he gene aliza ion in
(3)
as applying o he da a in
(1)
is he odd beha io o la e als. The la e al de e mines he appea ance o spi an s in he case
o
b,
g, bu o a s op in he case o
d.
(m
p60esJ
Alga
s. ald6a). Bu [I] should
be
ei he
[+can ]
o [-con ], and we would expec consequen ly a uni o m solu ion, i.e., ei he
ld,
*
lb,
*
19
o
*
18,
lp,
18,
which is w ong in ei he case.
Le 's call his he "la e al p oblem." Al hough I don' wan o en e in o he phonological
ea men s in de ail, I hink ha i is ai o say ha ,
as
shown by he di e si y o ea men s
a ailable, he e a e no sa is ac o y solu ions. This is e en mo e he case i he ac s a e
examined in mo e de ail (c . below).
3.
The
issue o homo ganici y.
Almos
all
phonological analyses, since
Hanis
(1%9), ha e ied
o
sol e he la e al p oblem by
de i ing he asymme y om he homo ganic cha ac e o he clus e
ld.
This has been done by
including a condi ion o sameness o place in he ule i sel , o by de i ing he e ec s om
mo e gene al p inciples.3
In his sec ion I wan o show ha a "homo ganic solu ion" is w ong on a ac ual basis. No ice
i s ha in Spanish, as shown in
(I),
he co ela ion be ween lack o spi an iza ion and
homo ganici y holds owing o a lack o e idence: he e a e cases o
ho no ganic
clus e s o
nasal o la e al
+
s op (m
b,
nd,
99,
ld) which obey he gene aliza ion, bu no a es ed cases o
he e o ganic
clus e s o nasal o la e al
+
spi an . In o he wo ds, he homo ganic solu ion
makes a speci ic he p edic ion, namely ha oiced s ops a e he e o ganic nasal o la e al will
spi an ize, bu he p edic ion canno be checked because nasals and la e als only appea
assimila ed in place o he ollowing oiced s op.
Mo eo e , his lack o coun e examples o he homo ganic solu ion is mo e appa en han eal.
In he case o clus e s wi h an ini ial ica i e we can ge
€Ja
(p og essi e assimila ion o place
and eg essi e assimila ion o oice):
em
be@e 'ins ead o ', and al hough i is clea ly
homo ganic wi h he p eceding consonan , he
d
ge s spi an ized.
Bu e en in he case o nasals and la e als, i we go beyond he no mal cases,
as
hose epo ed
in (I), he e is coun e e idence o he "homo ganic solu ion". I a p onuncia ion wi h
he e o ganic clus e s is o ced on speake s, we ne e ge he spi an --as a "homo ganic
solu ion" would p edic . This canno be done wi h all he cases, bu is qui e na u al o clus e s
like md,
mg,
gb, gd, in which case he s op appea s exac ly as in he cases whe e
homo ganici y holds. I should be poin ed ou ha in all "homo ganic" analyses homo ganici y
is c ucial o la e als, bu only in some (e.g. Hualde
(1988))
o nasals
as
well.
(4)
En Vie na m d]eí Su 'in Sou h Vie nam'
E1 Isla[m glue e o ' he igh ing Islam'
pa lu [ ;] b] a a o 'cheap pa king'
go[g dle pla a 'sil e gong'

In he case o Ca alan i is much easie o show ha spi an iza ion does no depend on
homo ganici y: he e o ganic clus e s o o al o nasal s op
+
b,d,g a e qui e equen , and
include also la e als.
(5)
a.
~Clbdi
b.
s6m d6s
'we a e wo' c.
g
BA d ndi
' u key'
keb
ga
s6m
g 6ns
'we a e big'
b6Adu
6 J
(place name)
s69 b5
6p
b5
'good yea '
up6A d5w
'egg yoik'
ma agda BJ
db
' ough yea '
uAdapSw
'po hole'
ep
g an
'bis yea '
s y~ d as
' i e days'
b
~
d
S
a
'I
come ea ly'
g dhlpa
'sun ise'
4.
Back o he ac s.
The ine icacy o he homo ganic solu ion lea es us wi h he la e al p oblem unsol ed. In
addi ion, analyses based on he gene aliza ion in
(3)
ace u he p oblems when he empi ical
domain is checked somewha mo e ca e ully. The e a e mainly wo p oblems o
be
added: i s ,
he "di e ences in a iabili y" ha de e mine an asymme y be ween con ex s showing ixed
solu ions, and con ex s ha allow bo h spi an s and s ops
in
a ia ion; second, he addi ional
odd case o ica i e+b,d,g clus e s, whe e we ge a dis ibu ion simila o ha o la e als.
Some o he li e a u e igh ly s esses he a iabili y o he phenomenon: in some cases he
solu ion p esen ed in
(1)
is dominan , bu no unique, and spi an and s op can bo h appea in
some con ex s.4 Second, con ex s do no beha e equally wi h espec o a iabili y. In some
cases he e is ha dly any a ia ion: he o ms
in
(6a) a e o ms ha a e no only e y a e
s a is ically in on o he spi an ized o ms in (6a'): when p esen ed wi h such sequences,
speake s ha e s ong nega i e judgemen s o accep abili y.
On
he o he hand, o (6b) hose
judgemen s ange om dubious o accep able, when compa ed wi h he mo e no mal cases o
(6b').
(6) a.
*
aba *ada
*
aga
a.'
apa
aaa
aya
*a npa
*
ancla
*
agya
*
alaa
amba anda
agga
alda
b. (?)axba (?)asda
(?)sega
b.'
axpa
asaa
aeya5
(?>Pa
(?)3a
(?)ga
ba
da
ga
In
he absence o mo e de ailed expe imen al da a, he a iabili y can be summa ized
as
ollows.
I
indica e he di e en con ex s (7a-k) and he con inuan alues o he elemen o he le o b,
d,
o g, and o b,
d,
g hemsel es, and
I
ha e added an example.
CLUSTER
OBSTRUENT STOP
NASAL
VOCOIDS,
R
LATERAL
+
D
LATERAL
+
B
,
G
PAUSE
FRICATIVES
+
B
D
G:
F+
B
CJlTBR,
HOMORGANiC
F
+
D,G
Chl-EF
HEXEBORGAMC
CONT
VALUE
[con ] 1s [con ] 2nd
- -
EXAMPLE
sClbdi (Ca .)
6nda
bIw Sa
ald6a
alga
gana
bC
b Gs
k
(Ca .)
dezae
bCl
3i 6k a
(Ca .)
dezplo
(7) inco po a es he obse a ion, o mal1 y epo ed a leas o Ca alan (Recasens
(
1986)), ha
in he case o he clus e
b
we no mally ind he s op
([
b]). Acco ding o my own
obse a ions wi h se e al speake s, he s op is much mo e a o ed in he case o @ han in he
o he cases o ica i e
+
b,
d,
g.,
i.e.:
(8) a.
b>p
b.
8>d
c.
-9
bu b usc bu di ec e bu glacial
ilbso basc ilbso disc e ilbso gallec
iom e bal iom doble iom glo ids
The da a summa ized in. (7) show he ollowing p oblems o an analysis based on sp eading
o [con inuan ]. Fi s he la e al p oblem, as al eady no ed. Second, he ac ha , al hough
homo ganici y has been shown no o play a ole in he case o nasals, la e als and s ops, in he
case o ica i es
a
close place o a icula ion makes he s op, i no s ic ly necessa y, a leas
p e e ed (7h), o possible (7i). Thi d, why should he e be a iabili y in pos pausal posi ion,
and a e homo ganic o quasi-homo ganic ica i es? I is a he s ihng ha in he cases in
which he [con inuan ] alue is assigned by de aul , as o owels and nasals, o unclea
(la e als) we ge a ixed solu ion, whe eas in hose cases whe e i is unde lying ( ica i es) we
ge a iabili y. Dialec s showing Ibe ian spi an iza ion di e widely in su ace esul s
depending on he in e ac ion o o he p ocesses, bu all show he kind o ixed beha io o
(3)
o
(7).
Le 's examine he la e al p oblem i s . And le us suppose o a momen ha we abandon he
equi emen o a s ic phonological solu ion. Is he e any hing in common, e.g. be ween clea
s ops, as in (7a, b), and [I] o [A] ollowed by [d]? Is he e any hing in common, simila ly,
be ween clea con inuan s, like owels o glides (7c), and [I] o [8] ollowed by
[PI
o [a]? A
ca e ul examina ion o he execu ion o a sequence like [ld] shows ha he a icula o y
co ela es o
[+can ],
ai low h ough an open ocal ac hold ue o all he ocal ac , excep
o i s cen al pa , in he pala oal eola egion. In his a ea he ai low is in e up ed by he
con ac o he on pa o he ongue blade and he ee h. Lowe ing o he back o he ongue
blade allows he ai o escape a ound he cen al closu e, be ween he cheek and he ee h.
A
phonological solu ion imposes /l/ o be ei he [+con inuan ] o [-con inuan ], bu phone ically
he co ela es o his ea u e a e no equally dis ibu ed along he ocal ac . Fo /l/ he e is
ai low om he glo is o he lips, bu he den o-pala o-al eola egion is excluded. The same
holds ue o
/ i,
which di e s om he o me because he lingual con ac is ex ended u he
back. In a ce ain sense we a e ex ending he idea ha nasals, hough clea ly con inuan s in a
global sense, a e
o al
s ops, o la e als, ha
--N.B.,
phone ically-- hough con inuan s in a
global sense, a e s ops in he cen al al eopala al egion.
The gene al idea is hus ha a)
no phona ion
implies (unde no mal ci cums ances)
NO
ai low;
b)
o al o al closu e
implies
NOai low
(o close o ze o
i
he e is a p essu e inc ease); c)
o al
o al ape u e
(du ing phona ion) implies
ai Jow.;
d)
local closu es
de e mine
ai low
in gene al,
bu
NO
ai low
locally..
The e is
an
ob ious way o cap u e he ideas ske ched abo e. Spi an iza ion is co ela ed wi h
exis ence o ai low du ing he p oduc ion o he p eceding segmen . Bu , c ucially, his ai low
has o
be
egis e ed a he place o a icula ion o he spi an izing consonan , no a he place o
he p eceding segmen i sel . In o he wo ds,
[d]
is a s op because a
i s
place o a icula ion,
i.e. he den al egion, he e is no ai low du ing he a icula ion o [I]. On he o he hand,
[PI
and [VI a e spi an s because a
i s
place o a icula ion, i.e. he labial and he ela egions,
espec i ely, he e is ai low du ing he a icula ion o [I]
The e is
an
ob ious way o cap u e he ideas ske ched abo e. Spi an iza ion is co ela ed wi h
exis ence o ai low du ing he p oduc ion o he p eceding segmen . Bu , c ucially, his ai low