scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Technology transfers from universities and innovation

Abstract

This study uses causal inference methods to assess the impact of university research and development (R&D) transfers on firm innovation, utilizing the Spanish survey (PITEC) spanning the period from 2003 to 2016. In particular, multivariate Nearest Neighbor Matching (NNM) method is employed for the estimation of the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATET). The findings indicate that university collaboration has a mostly positive impact on a range of innovation outcomes, including process innovation, product innovation, and patent registration, but it mainly not significant. These findings lend support to the proposition that university R&D transfers are an important factor in stimulating firm innovation. Finally, the research acknowledges the limitations of its methodology and suggests avenues for future research.

Read accessible full text

Technology transfers from universities and innovation

Author: Oiz Chueca, Mirian
Year: 2025
Source: https://addi.ehu.eus/bitstream/10810/73809/4/TFM_Oiz.pdf
Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU
Mas e Thesis
Technology ans e s om uni e si ies and inno a ion
Mi ian Oiz Chueca
Supe ised by Ja ie Ga deazabal Ma ías
July 22nd, 2024
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 2 -
Table o con en s
1. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………… 4
2. LITERATURE REVIEW ……………………………………………………. 5
3. DATA DESCRIPTION ……………………………………………………… 6
3.1. Va iable de ini ion ……………….…………………...…………….…… 7
3.2. Desc ip i e analysis ………………………..…………………….……… 9
4. METHODOLOGY …………………………………………...……………... 10
5. RESULTS …………………………………………………………………... 12
5.1. E ec o collabo a ion wi h uni e si ies ……………….……………… 12
5.2. Compa ison wi h he e ec o collabo a ion wi h o he companies ……. 20
5.3. Compa ison wi h he e ec o collabo a ion wi h any ype o
o ganiza ion ……………………………………………………………. 21
6. CONCLUSIONS …………………………………………….……………... 22
7. REFERENCES ……………………………………………………….…….. 24
8. APPENDIX ..………………………………………………………………. 26
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 3 -
Abs ac
This s udy uses causal in e ence me hods o assess he impac o uni e si y esea ch and
de elopmen (R&D) ans e s on i m inno a ion, u ilizing he Spanish su ey (PITEC)
spanning he pe iod om 2003 o 2016. In pa icula , mul i a ia e Nea es Neighbo
Ma ching (NNM) me hod is employed o he es ima ion o he A e age T ea men E ec
on he T ea ed (ATET). The indings indica e ha uni e si y collabo a ion has a mos ly
posi i e impac on a ange o inno a ion ou comes, including p ocess inno a ion, p oduc
inno a ion, and pa en egis a ion, bu i mainly no signi ican . These indings lend
suppo o he p oposi ion ha uni e si y R&D ans e s a e an impo an ac o in
s imula ing i m inno a ion. Finally, he esea ch acknowledges he limi a ions o i s
me hodology and sugges s a enues o u u e esea ch.
Key wo ds: R&D ans e s, inno a ion, uni e si ies
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 4 -
1. INTRODUCTION
In he con empo a y business en i onmen , cha ac e ized by apid change and in ense
compe i ion, he capaci y o inno a e is o pa amoun impo ance o i ms seeking o
succeed and gain a compe i i e ad an age. Uni e si ies, wi h hei subs an ial in ellec ual
capi al and pionee ing esea ch, se e as a impo an condui o ins illing an en i onmen
conduci e o inno a ion. In ligh o his, he e has been a no able inc ease in he numbe
o uni e si y-indus y collabo a ions, wi h i ms p oac i ely engaging wi h uni e si ies
in o de o gain access o hei expe ise and knowledge esou ces.
This esea ch explo es he complex in e ela ionship be ween uni e si y R&D
collabo a ion wi h i ms and his las ones’ inno a ion. This s udy speci ically examines
he impac o uni e si y collabo a ion on a i m's inno a i e pe o mance, encompassing
p ocess inno a ion, p oduc inno a ion, and pa en egis a ion. The analysis employs
da a om he Spanish su ey, PITEC (Panel de Inno ación Tecnológica, Panel o
Technological Inno a ion), which co e s R&D ans o ma ion in companies om 2003
o 2016. The su ey ga he s comp ehensi e da a on a ange o inno a ion- ela ed opics,
including uni e si y-indus y collabo a ion, inno a ion ou comes, and i m
cha ac e is ics, o be used o he esea ch analysis. The me hodology employed combines
mul i a ia e nea es neighbo ma ching, wi h accoun s o obse ed con ounding, and
di e ence-in-di e ence, which accoun s o ime in a ian unobse ed con ounding.
This esea ch is d i en by he esea ch ques ion: does he ans e o esea ch and
de elopmen (R&D) om uni e si ies o i ms lead o inc eased inno a ion in hose
i ms? By analyzing da a om he PITEC su ey and employing a obus me hodology,
his s udy aims o answe his ques ion and con ibu e o he unde s anding o he ole ha
his uni e si y ans e s plays in d i ing inno a ion in i ms. The analysis will commence
wi h a e iew o he ex an li e a u e, ollowed by a comp ehensi e accoun o he
a ailable da a and he me hodology o be employed. Subsequen ly, he indings will be
p esen ed, and some conclusions will be d awn.
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 5 -
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
The con e gence o academic esea ch and indus ial inno a ion ep esen s a
signi ican d i e o economic g ow h. This e iew examines he impac o uni e si y
esea ch and de elopmen (R&D) ans e s on i m inno a ion. This s udy examines he
ole o uni e si ies as ca alys s, acili a ing he ans o ma ion o knowledge in o cu ing-
edge p oduc s and p ocesses.
Se e al s udies suppo a posi i e associa ion be ween uni e si y echnology ans e
and i m inno a ion. Ga cía-Vega & Vicen e-Chi i ella (2020) demons a e a signi ican
ise in inno a i eness o i ms acqui ing R&D om uni e si ies. Ca boni & Medda
(2021) ein o ces his link, highligh ing he e ec i eness o uni e si y R&D in p omo ing
p oduc inno a ion. Fu he mo e, Li & Tan (2020) ind a posi i e spillo e e ec om
uni e si y R&D ac i i ies on i m inno a ion wi hin he same geog aphic loca ion.
The e ec i eness o uni e si y R&D ans e s depends on a ious ac o s. Bellucci &
Pennacchio (2015) emphasize he impo ance o a uni e si y's en ep eneu ial spi i and
he quali y o i s esea ch. Fi ms wi h open sea ch s a egies and a ocus on adical
inno a ion bene i mo e om uni e si y knowledge (Bellucci &
Pennacchio, 2015). Addi ionally, Ga cía-Vega & Vicen e-Chi i ella (2024) sugges ha
a i m's abso p i e capaci y, i s abili y o unde s and and u ilize ex e nal
knowledge, plays a c i ical ole in le e aging uni e si y R&D e ec i ely.
Uni e si y R&D ans e s can also gene a e posi i e ex e nali ies beyond di ec
knowledge acquisi ion. Ga cía-Vega & Vicen e-Chi i ella (2020) ind ha hese ans e s
enhance i ms' in e nal R&D capabili ies, po en ially c ea ing a i uous cycle o
inno a ion. Simila ly, Acos a e al. (2009) highligh he ole o uni e si y g adua es as a
sou ce o knowledge spillo e s, con ibu ing o new business o ma ion in high-
echnology sec o s.
Collabo a ion ne wo ks u he in luence he bene i s i ms de i e om uni e si y
R&D. Bolí a -Ramos (2017) inds ha i ms collabo a ing wi h uni e si ies in na ional

Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 6 -
o egional ne wo ks show a s onge pa en ing p opensi y compa ed o hose wi hou
such collabo a ions. Howe e , Becke e al. (2023) sugges ha uni e si y spillo e s can
be limi ed, wi h some e idence o posi i e e ec s on pa en ing and new- o- ma ke
inno a ion in speci ic ci cums ances.
While uni e si y R&D ans e s o e signi ican ad an ages, challenges emain.
Kanama & Nishikawa (2015) iden i y a ious obs acles in inno a ion ac i i ies, such as
inancial and echnological limi a ions, ha d i e i ms o seek uni e si y
knowledge. Howe e , access o uni e si y knowledge may no always ansla e in o
p o i able inno a ion.
In conclusion, a g owing body o esea ch suppo s he posi i e impac o uni e si y
R&D ans e s on i m inno a ion. The e ec i eness o hese ans e s depends on ac o s
such as he i m's abso p i e capaci y, he uni e si y's esea ch en i onmen , and he
na u e o collabo a ion ne wo ks. Fu he esea ch is needed o explo e he mechanisms
unde lying uni e si y R&D spillo e s and iden i y s a egies o maximize hei bene i s
o i ms.
3. DATA DESCRIPTION
This sec ion p esen s a desc ip ion o he da abase used, he a iables employed o
he analysis, and he new a iables ha ha e been gene a ed om he exis ing ones. I
will conclude wi h a b ie desc ip i e analysis o he sample. In o de o asce ain he
in luence o collabo a ion wi h uni e si ies on o ganiza ional inno a ion, he p esen
s udy u ilizes an exis ing da abase om a Spanish su ey, namely PITEC, conduc ed
be ween 2003 and 2016.
The PITEC (Panel de Inno ación Tecnológica, Panel o Technological Inno a ion)
p ojec has he objec i e o ep esen ing he si ua ion and e olu ion o inno a i e
companies in Spain, as well as he de ec ion o oppo uni ies and needs in his ield. The
p ojec commenced in 2003 wi h he collabo a ion o he FECYT (Fundación Española
pa a la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Spanish Founda ion o Science and Technology) and
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 7 -
he Co ec Founda ion, wi h he inpu o a g oup o esea che s om a ious uni e si ies.
Howe e , his ceased o be ca ied ou in 2016.
The da a om his pe iod o e s mo e han 460 a iables de i ed om app oxima ely
12,000 companies su eyed om 2003 onwa d, acili a ing he cons uc ion o ime se ies
ha can be used o s udy he e olu ion and impac o inno a ion in he business sec o , as
well as o iden i y he di e se inno a ion s a egies employed by companies in ques ion.
As i is a ixed panel, an annual obse a ion is collec ed om each i m, which ensu es
ha he da a ob ained a e o high quali y and eliabili y. The panel o companies is
selec ed om he na ional su eys ca ied ou by he INE (Ins i u o Nacional de
Es adís ica, Na ional S a is ics Ins i u e) in he inno a ion sec o : "Su ey on
Technological Inno a ion in Companies" and "S a is ics on R&D ac i i ies".
3.1. Va iable de ini ion
As p e iously s a ed, he da abase comp ises a mul i ude o a iables measu ing
di e se quali ies, om which we ha e iden i ied hose pe inen o ou in es iga ion. The
p ima y a iable o in e es , which will se e as he basis o in e ence, is he ans e o
esea ch and de elopmen (R&D) unds om uni e si ies o i ms. They appea as
'Pu chase o R&D se ices in Spain/uni e si ies' and 'Pu chase o R&D se ices
ab oad/uni e si ies'. They ep esen he p opo ion o ex e nal R&D expendi u e in he
i m, along wi h he pu chase o se ices in o he en i ies, which we will la e addi ionally
analyze. F om hese, he main ea men a iable o he s udy has been c ea ed, which
akes alue o 1 i he i m has ecei ed ans e s om uni e si ies and 0 i i has no .
Fu he mo e, as in Ga cía-Vega and Vicen e-Chi i ella (2020), we ha e de ined a
class o i ms ha ha e been called "s a e s". This denomina ion is accompanied by he
yea in which he company collabo a es wi h a uni e si y o he i s ime ( i s ime i
ecei es ans e s). In his way, as many s a e a iables ha e been gene a ed as he e a e
yea s in he da abase, wi h a dummy ca ego y and a alue o 1 i he company is a s a e
ha yea and 0 o he wise. In able 1 he s a e coun o each yea can be seen. The
numbe o s a e s o each yea o he sample is sp ead o e he yea s, wi h all yea s
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 8 -
ha ing igu es in he app oxima e ange o be ween 400 and 800, excep yea 2014, wi h
mo e han 1800, and 2015 wi h 203 i ms.
Table 1 S a e s
( i s ime ecei ing ans e s)
Yea
Numbe o s a e s
2004
591
2005
884
2006
503
2007
631
2008
547
2009
516
2010
511
2011
468
2012
409
2013
426
2014
1826
2015
203
2016
575
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
The a iables employed as ea men a e he ‘s a e s’ ones discussed in he p eceding
pa ag aphs, wi h 2006 being he example yea : he p e- ea men pe iod is de ined as
spanning 2003 o 2005, while he pos - ea men pe iod, du ing which he e ec s o
ea men can be obse ed, is de ined as spanning 2006 o 2016. The ea ed g oup is
de ined as he i ms which commenced collabo a ion wi h uni e si ies in 2006, while he
con ol g oup is de ined as he i ms ha nei he collabo a ed wi h uni e si ies no any
o he o he en i ies.
As o he dependen a iables, di e en ou comes ha e been aken as indica o s o
he deg ee o inno a ion o inno a i e capaci y o he i ms. These a e whe he o no he
company has had a p ocess inno a ion in he p e ious wo yea s, whe he o no i has
had a p oduc inno a ion in he p e ious wo yea s, whe he o no i has had a pa en
applica ion and he numbe o pa en s egis e ed. The impac o collabo a ion be ween
companies and uni e si ies on he ou has been in es iga ed o e he cou se o he
ollowing yea s.
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 9 -
In closing, se e al con ol a iables ha e been selec ed o use as co a ia es in he
es ima ion o e ec s. These include he numbe o employees o he i m, he amoun o
physical capi al, he amoun o ex e nal esea ch and de elopmen expendi u e, he
amoun o in e nal esea ch and de elopmen expendi u e, he p esence o absence o
expo s, and inally, whe he he i m belongs o a business g oup.
3.2. Desc ip i e analysis
P io o es ima ing he e ec s in ques ion, a b ie desc ip i e analysis was conduc ed
o gain a comp ehensi e unde s anding o he sample. The da a a e p esen ed in Table 2,
which shows he numbe o obse a ions, he mean, and he s anda d de ia ion o he
ull sample, as well as o he obse a ions o i ms ha ha e ecei ed uni e si y ans e s
and hose ha ha e no , sepa a ely.
Table 2 Desc ip i e s a is ics
Full sample
Wi h uni e si y ans e s
Wi hou uni e si y ans e s
Obs.
Mean
S d. de .
Obs.
Mean
S d. de .
Obs.
Mean
S d. de .
T ea men Va i a b l e
T ans e s om
uni e si ies
171.511
0,261
0,439
44.812
1
0
126.699
0
0
Ou come a iables
P ocess inno a ion
135.798
0,467
0,498
9.110
0,704
0,457
126.688
0,451
0,498
P oduc inno a ion
135.799
0,464
0,498
9.110
0,744
0,437
126.689
0,445
0,497
Pa en s
135.797
0,101
0,301
9.109
0,311
0,463
126.688
0,086
0,281
Numbe o pa en s
125.717
0,487
5,938
8.325
2,238
14,385
117.392
0,363
4,781
Con ol a iables
Employmen
135.810
333,624
1.527,846
9.111
393,854
1.337,530
126.699
329,296
1.540,540
Physical in es men
135.810
4,507
12,970
9.111
10,807
17,271
126.699
4,055
12,482
Resea che s in R&D
135.810
6,765
18,684
9.111
23,904
23,773
126.699
5,533
17,634
In e nal R&D
135.810
39,609
43,815
9.111
66,055
26,574
126.699
37,708
44,195
Expo s
171.511
0,628
0,483
44.812
0,937
0,243
126.699
0,519
0,500
G oup
135.724
0,411
0,492
9.088
0,503
0,500
126.636
0,405
0,491
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 16 -
Figu e 2 shows he e ec s in a imeline ashion, and al hough as no ed abo e mos o
hem a e posi i e, hey a e no as obus o ep esen a i e as migh be expec ed a i s .
Figu e 2 Impac o ea men on p oduc inno a ion
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
A simila pa e n eme ges wi h espec o he p obabili y o iling a pa en when
ini ia ing collabo a ion wi h uni e si ies. This ou come unde sco es ha , excep o a ew
yea s in he 2006 coho and owa ds he end o 2015 and 2016, he p obabili y o iling
a pa en is highe when s a ing o collabo a e wi h uni e si ies. The nume ical e ec s a e
p esen ed in Table 5. I is in his ou come ha he e ec s a e mos signi ican , and hus i
can be s a ed ha , wi h ega d o inno a ion, he mos no able e ec obse ed in he
-.12
-.08
-.04
0
.04
.08
.12
Impac
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Da e
Impac es ima e
95% con idence in e al
Da a om 2011-2016
Impac on P oduc Inno a ion o 2011 s a e s

Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 17 -
analysis is he inc ease in he p opo ion o hose who ha e egis e ed pa en s wi h espec
o hose who ha e no egis e ed any. Fu he mo e, as illus a ed in Figu e 3, mos e ec s
a e posi i e, wi h alues exceeding ze o.
Table 5 Change in he p obabili y o egis e ing a pa en
Impac in yea
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
S a e
o
2006
.0011
(.0152)
.0243
(.0178)
.0209
(.0205)
-.0124
(.0206)
.0080
(.0216)
-.0170
(.0210)
-.0163
(.0218)
.0070
(.0227)
-.0180
(.0241)
.0015
(.0238)
-.0115
(.0235)
2007
.0322**
(.0156)
.0373**
(.0182)
.0269
(.0197)
.0247
(.0211)
.0244
(.0216)
.0251
(.0219)
.0359
(.0223)
.0242
(.0237)
.0478**
(.0240)
.0308
(.0234)
2008
.0499***
(.0169)
.0281
(.0185)
.0401*
(.0209)
.0291
(.0218)
.0328
(.0221)
.0634***
(.0226)
.0361
(0238)
.0471*
(.0241)
.0304
(.0247)
2009
.0082
(.0165)
.0283
(.0196)
.0204
(.0216)
.0438**
(.0221)
.0589**
(.0240)
.0467*
(.0254)
.0319
(.0254)
.0299
(.0252)
2010
-.0048
(.0173)
-.0181
(.0195)
.0084
(.0202)
.0254
(.0233)
.0202
(.0241)
.0210
(.0239)
.0301
(.0237)
2011
.0065
(.0183)
.0136
(.0205)
.0458**
(.0227)
.0289
(.0237)
.0146
(.0246)
.0099
(.0261)
2012
.0264
(.0194)
.0383*
(.0213)
.0247
(.0236)
.0093
(.0251)
-.0073
(.0258)
2013
.0514**
(.0199)
.0402*
(.0212)
.0195
(.0228)
.0010
(.0249)
2014
.0210
(.0218)
.0243
(.0225)
.0133
(.0114)
2015
.0171
(.0203)
-.0153
(.0219)
2016
-.0224
(.0246)
∗ Signi ican a 10%; ∗∗ Signi ican a 5%; ∗∗∗ signi ican a 1%.
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 18 -
Figu e 3 Impac o ea men on pa en egis a ion
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
Finally, he las ou come o be analyzed is he change in he numbe o pa en s iled
(Table 6). The es ima es ob ained exhibi a high a iabili y, and he e is no clea pa e n
o posi i e o nega i e e ec s wi h almos all es ima es being insigni ican ly di e en
om ze o, so no i m conclusions can be d awn abou hese e ec s. I can also be seen
ha he s anda d e o s a e conside ably la ge han he o he s, and all his could be ela ed
o he con inuous na u e o he ou come.
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 19 -
Table 6 Change in he numbe o egis e ed pa en s
Impac in yea
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
S a e
o
2006
.0438
(.0920)
.1165
(.2004)
-.4500
(.6423)
-.0622
(.3324)
.0164
(.4542)
-.2942
(.2816)
-.1071
(.4754)
.1195
(.4782)
.3030
(.5500)
-.1630
(.5754)
-.1946
(.6685)
2007
.1545
(.1819)
-1.163
(1.339)
.1819
(.2491)
.2150
(.3651)
-.0374
(.2029)
.0055
(.3950)
.0041
(.4108)
.1086
(.4862)
-.4652
(.8415)
-.6558
(.8689)
2008
-.6358
(.8092)
.2230
(.2658)
.1796
(.3966)
-.3360
(.3484)
.2267
(.5077)
-.1975
(.5495)
.3050
(.4998)
-.8837
(1.377)
-.8229
(1.328)
2009
.9361
(.9608)
1.128
(.9464)
.5410
(.9700)
1.040
(1.016)
1.091
(.9966)
.6151
(.9276)
-.9582
(1.569)
-1.029
(1.494)
2010
.0302
(.2256)
-.6533*
(.3855)
.0250
(.4572)
-.4365
(.3945)
-.2279
(.4886)
-.6273
(.5424)
-1.141
(.7150)
2011
-.7564
(.5721)
-.3828
(.3853)
-.3576
(.4088)
.2046
(.5254)
-1.997
(1.423)
-1.629
(1.636)
2012
.3527
(.4991)
.4364
(.4661)
.5516
(.5408)
-1.387
(1.594)
-1.483
(1.554)
2013
.2240
(.1956)
.5124*
(.2846)
-1.538
(1.601)
-1.046
(1.679)
2014
.6782
(.5710)
-.4408
(.9640)
-.3039
(.2792)
2015
-1.539
(.9540)
-2.17**
(1.012)
2016
-.7493
(.5091)
∗ Signi ican a 10%; ∗∗ Signi ican a 5%; ∗∗∗ signi ican a 1%.
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
G aphically, we also ind mo e i egula lines han in he g aphs o he o he esul s,
highligh ing a d op in he numbe o pa en s egis e ed in 2008, p obably ela ed o he
Spanish c isis o ha yea , which can be analyzed in he g aphs o se e al o he s a e s.
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 20 -
Figu e 4 Impac o ea men on numbe o pa en egis a ion
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
5.2. Compa ison wi h he e ec o collabo a ion wi h o he companies (p oduc
inno a ion)
Wi h he in en ion o ex ending he analysis ca ied ou and inding new
cha ac e is ics o he de e minan s o en ep eneu ial inno a ion, he ini ial a iables and
he ATET es ima es we e e o mula ed, bu conside ing ha he ea men was now
collabo a ion wi h o he i ms. In his way, he e ec on en ep eneu ial inno a ion can
be compa ed wi h he es ima es ob ained o collabo a ion wi h uni e si ies.
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 21 -
Due o he size o he esul s ables, one esul (in his case p oduc inno a ion) has
been selec ed and included in Appendix 1. The esul s o R&D ans e s wi h o he
en e p ises a e simila o hose o uni e si ies. Fo mos s a e s, he e ec on he
p obabili y o ha ing a p oduc inno a ion is posi i e when hey s a o pu chase esea ch
se ices om o he en e p ises, wi h hese igu es being e y signi ican o s a e s
en e p ises in ecen yea s. Figu e 5 shows ha he e ec s ollow a simila pa e n o
bo h ypes o collabo a ion and ha he ange o he es ima es and he con idence in e als
a e he same (collabo a ion wi h uni e si ies is he blue line and wi h companies he ed
line).
Figu e 5 Compa ison o p oduc inno a ion o s a e s o 2008 and 2009
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
5.3. Compa ison wi h he e ec o collabo a ion wi h any ype o o ganiza ion
(pa en egis a ion)
To comple e his ex ension o he s udy, a di e en ea men g oup was again
selec ed, consis ing o hose en e p ises ha s a ed o collabo a e wi h one o he
o ganiza ions o which he sample p o ides da a (g oup en e p ises, o he en e p ises,
uni e si ies, public adminis a ion o ganiza ions, p i a e non-p o i o ganiza ions and

Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 22 -
in e na ional o ganiza ions). The con ol g oup includes all i ms ha ha e ne e
collabo a ed wi h anyone, and o show he compa ison o esul s, he ou come o pa en ing
has been chosen ( he able o es ima es can be ound in Appendix 2).
As expec ed, he e ec ound is also p edominan ly posi i e. I he indi idual
collabo a ions wi h uni e si ies and o he companies we e posi i e, we would expec an
e en la ge change in he p obabili y o iling a pa en . Howe e , he obse ed e ec is
no as signi ican as an icipa ed and canno be ex ended o he en i e popula ion (only o
some s a e s in he sample). This compa ison can also be seen in g aphical o m in Figu e
6, whe e collabo a ion wi h uni e si ies is ep esen ed by he blue line and join
collabo a ion by he g een line.
Figu e 6 Compa ison o pa en egis a ion o s a e s o 2009 and 2010
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion wi h PITEC da a
6. CONCLUSIONS
This s udy p o ides weak e idence in suppo o he p oposi ion ha uni e si y
collabo a ions os e inno a ion wi hin i ms. The indings illus a e ha he majo i y o
pa icipa ing o ganiza ions ha e expe ienced posi i e bu mos ly insigni ican impac s on
a ious inno a ion ou comes, including p ocess and p oduc inno a ion. These esul s a e
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 23 -
no qui e in acco dance wi h exis ing esea ch which has iden i ied he impo an ole
played by he ans e o uni e si y esea ch and de elopmen o i ms in s imula ing
inno a ion.
I is impo an o acknowledge ha he indings o his s udy a e subjec o ce ain
limi a ions. The me hodology employed di e s om ha desc ibed in he o iginal pape s.
Fu he mo e, he s udy concen a es on he in luence o uni e si y collabo a ion, whe eas
o he ac o s, including he abili ies and expe ise o employees, business ac i i y,
inancial esou ces, and echnological in as uc u e, also exe a conside able in luence
on inno a ion.
Fu he esea ch should in es iga e hese mul i ace ed ac o s in g ea e dep h in o de
o gain a mo e comp ehensi e unde s anding o hei in e ac ion wi h uni e si y
collabo a ion and i s ul ima e impac on i m inno a ion. By in es iga ing he mode a ing
and media ing e ec s o hese a iables, esea che s can p o ide mo e de ailed
knowledge o he ci cums ances unde which uni e si y collabo a ions a e mos e ec i e
in d i ing inno a ion.
Despi e hese limi a ions, he indings o his s udy highligh he signi ican ole o
ins i u ional collabo a ion in s imula ing inno a ion wi hin i ms. By le e aging he
expe ise and esou ces o uni e si ies, i ms can enhance hei inno a i e capabili ies,
leading o he de elopmen o new p oduc s, p ocesses, and se ices ha d i e economic
g ow h and socie al well-being.
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 24 -
7. REFERENCES
Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2011). Bias-Co ec ed Ma ching Es ima o s o A e age
T ea men E ec s. Jou nal O Business & Economic S a is ics, 29(1), 1-11.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1198/jbes.2009.07333
Abadie, A., D ukke , D., He , J. L., & Imbens, G. W. (2004). Implemen ing Ma ching Es ima o s
o A e age T ea men E ec s in S a a. The S a a Jou nal, 4(3), 290-311.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1536867x0400400307
Acos a, M., Co onado, D., & Flo es, E. (2009). Uni e si y spillo e s and new business loca ion
in high- echnology sec o s: Spanish e idence. Small Business Economics, 36(3), 365-
376.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11187-009-9224-4
Becke , B., Rope , S., & Vanino, E. (2023). Assessing inno a ion spillo e s om publicly unded
R&D and inno a ion suppo : E idence om he UK. Techno a ion, 128, 102860.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j. echno a ion.2023.102860
Bellucci, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2015). Uni e si y knowledge and i m inno a ion: e idence om
Eu opean coun ies. The Jou nal O Technology T ans e , 41(4), 730-752.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10961-015-9408-9
Bolí a -Ramos, M. T. (2017). The ela ion be ween R&D spending and pa en s: The mode a ing
e ec o collabo a ion ne wo ks. Jou nal O Enginee ing And Technology
Managemen , 46, 26-38.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jeng ecman.2017.11.001
(Bolí a -Ramos, 2017)
Ca boni, O. A., & Medda, G. (2021). Ex e nal R&D and p oduc inno a ion: Is o e -ou sou cing
an issue? Economic Modelling, 103, 105601.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105601
Ce ulli, G., Gab iele, R., & Po ì, B. (2016). The ole o i m R&D e o and collabo a ion as
media ing d i e s o inno a ion policy e ec i eness. Indus y And Inno a ion, 23(5),
426-447.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/13662716.2016.1169159
Ga cía-Vega, M., & Vicen e-Chi i ella, Ó. (2020). Do uni e si y echnology ans e s inc ease
i ms’ inno a ion? Eu opean Economic Re iew, 123, 03388.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.eu oeco e .2020.103388
Ga cía-Vega, M., & Vicen e-Chi i ella, Ó. (2024). The Role o Public Ex e nal Knowledge o
Fi m Inno a i eness. In e na ional Jou nal O Indus ial O ganiza ion, 103056.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijindo g.2024.103056
Kanama, D., & Nishikawa, K. (2015). Wha ype o obs acles in inno a ion ac i i ies make i ms
access uni e si y knowledge? An empi ical s udy o he use o uni e si y knowledge on
inno a ion ou comes. The Jou nal O Technology T ans e , 42(1), 141-157.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10961-015-9459-y
Li, X., & Tan, Y. (2020). Uni e si y R&D ac i i ies and i m inno a ions. Finance Resea ch
Le e s, 37, 101364.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j. l.2019.101364
Mi ian Oiz / Mas e in Economics: Empi ical Applica ions and Policies
- 25 -
Da asou ce
INE, In i u o Nacional de Es adís ica. (2003-2016). Mic oda a Panel de Inno ación Tecnológica
(PITEC) [Conjun o de da os].