Edi o ial
GS Spa k: Jou nal o Applied Academic Discou se
Volume 03, Issue 01, 2025, pp. 1-6
OPEN ACCESS
F ee lowing i e o knowledge
Scien i ic W i ing: Wha Needs To Be Included
Ni oj Dahal
Ka hmandu Uni e si y School o Educa ion, Lali pu , Nepal
How o ci e his a icle: Dahal, N. (2025). Scien i ic w i ing: Wha needs o be included. GS Spa k:
Jou nal o Applied Academic Discou se, 3(1), 1-6. h ps://doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.17289345
1
GS Spa k: Jou nal o Applied Academic Discou se (ISSN: 3021-9329) Copy igh © 2025
The Edi o : Gau ishanka Mul iple Campus, Bhimeshwo -3, Cha iko , Dolakha, Nepal.
Dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License
(CC BY-NC 4.0)
NC
BY
CC
INFO
Ni oj Dahal
E-mail
[email p o ec ed]
ORCID
h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0001-7646-1186
ABSTRACT
Scien i ic w i ing se es as he basis o
academic communica ion and knowledge
dissemina ion in esea ch communi ies
wo ldwide. This edi o ial examines he
essen ial componen s ha cons i u e e ec i e
scien i ic w i ing, add essing bo h s uc u al
and quali a i e elemen s necessa y o
success ul schola ly communica ion. The
discussion encompasses undamen al aspec s,
including p ope manusc ip s uc u e,
adhe ence o o ma ing guidelines, e hical
conside a ions, and he c i ical ole o cla i y in
scien i ic exp ession. D awing on es ablished
esea ch me hodologies and publica ion
s anda ds, his edi o ial guides esea che s a
all ca ee s ages who seek o enhance hei
scien i ic w i ing capabili ies. Key a eas
explo ed include he impo ance o
comp ehensi e li e a u e e iews,
me hodological anspa ency, app op ia e use
o ci a ions, and he e hical obliga ions inhe en
in schola ly publishing. The edi o ial
emphasizes ha e ec i e scien i ic w i ing
ex ends beyond me ely documen ing esea ch
indings o encompass clea communica ion o
me hodologies, implica ions, and limi a ions.
Fu he mo e, i highligh s he ans o ma i e
Dahal, N. (2025). GS Spa k, 3(1)
GS Spa k: Jou nal o Applied Academic Discou se (ISSN: 3021-9329)
2
po en ial o well-cons uc ed scien i ic
na a i es in ad ancing in e disciplina y
collabo a ion and os e ing inno a ion ac oss
STEAM disciplines. The ecommenda ions
p esen ed he ein aim o suppo he
de elopmen o w i ing p ac ices ha mee
publica ion s anda ds while also making
signi ican con ibu ions o he b oade
scien i ic discou se and ad ancing knowledge.
Finally, his edi o ial concludes wi h a b ie
o e iew o he a icles ea u ed in Volume 3,
Issue 1.
Keywo ds: scien i ic w i ing, academic
communica ion, knowledge dissemina ion,
o ma ing guidelines, e hical conside a ions
In oduc ion
Scien i ic w i ing is one o he mos
c i ical skills o esea che s ac oss all
disciplines, se ing as he p ima y means o
communica ing disco e ies, me hodologies,
and insigh s o he global scien i ic communi y
(Day & Gas el, 2016). The abili y o con ey
complex esea ch indings clea ly and
accu a ely has become inc easingly impo an
in ou in e connec ed academic landscape,
whe e in e disciplina y collabo a ion and
knowledge ans e d i e inno a ion (Swo d,
2012). As no ed by Pinke (2014), e ec i e
scien i ic w i ing dissemina es in o ma ion
while also shaping he ajec o y o scien i ic
p og ess by making esea ch accessible and
ac ionable o di e se audiences. The
signi icance o well-s uc u ed scien i ic
w i ing ex ends beyond indi idual publica ion
success o encompass b oade implica ions o
scien i ic in eg i y and ep oducibili y
(Casade all & Fang, 2018). In an e a whe e
esea ch anspa ency and open science
p ac ices a e inc easingly emphasized, he
quali y o scien i ic communica ion has a di ec
impac on he eliabili y and u ili y o published
esea ch (Nosek e al., 2015). Fu he mo e, he
democ a iza ion o scien i ic knowledge
h ough clea and comp ehensi e w i ing
se es o b idge he gap be ween specialized
esea ch communi ies and b oade socie al
applica ions (B ownell e al., 2013).
Essen ial Componen s and S uc u e
Manusc ip O ganiza ion
The ounda ion o e ec i e scien i ic
w i ing lies in adhe ence o es ablished
s uc u al amewo ks ha acili a e eade
comp ehension and in o ma ion e ie al
(Hea d, 2016). The con en ional IMRaD
o ma (In oduc ion, Me hods, Resul s, and
Discussion) p o ides a logical p og ession
ha mi o s he scien i ic me hod and eade
expec a ions (Sollaci & Pe ei a, 2004). Each
sec ion se es dis inc unc ions: he
in oduc ion es ablishes con ex and a ionale
(Swales & Feak, 2012), me hods ensu e
ep oducibili y (A ino e al., 2013), esul s
p esen indings objec i ely (Dahal, 2025;
Kalle , 2004), and discussion in e p e s
implica ions and limi a ions (Doche y &
Smi h, 1999).
Beyond basic s uc u e, e ec i e
manusc ip s equi e comp ehensi e li e a u e
e iews ha posi ion esea ch wi hin exis ing
knowledge amewo ks (Boo h e al., 2016).
The in eg a ion o ele an ci a ions p o ides
eade s wi h pa hways o u he explo a ion
(Pea s & Shields, 2019). Mo eo e ,
app op ia e use o igu es, ables, and
supplemen a y ma e ials enhances
comp ehension and suppo s main ex ual
a gumen s (Tu e, 2001).
Ti le and Abs ac Cons uc ion
The c a o in o ma i e i les and
abs ac s ep esen s a c i ical componen o
scien i ic communica ion, as hese elemen s
o en de e mine eade engagemen and
disco e abili y (Ha ley, 2008). E ec i e
i les should be concise ye desc ip i e,
inco po a ing key e ms ha acili a e
da abase sea ches while a oiding unnecessa y
Dahal, N. (2025). GS Spa k, 3(1)
GS Spa k: Jou nal o Applied Academic Discou se (ISSN: 3021-9329)
3
ja gon (Ba deka , 2016). Simila ly, abs ac s
mus p o ide comp ehensi e summa ies ha
enable eade s o assess he esea ch's
ele ance and me hodology wi hou needing
o access he ull manusc ip (And ade, 2011).
Language and S yle Conside a ions
Cla i y and p ecision in scien i ic
w i ing demand ca e ul a en ion o language
choices and s ylis ic con en ions ha enhance
eadabili y while main aining accu acy
(Gopen & Swan, 1990). The use o ac i e
oice, when app op ia e, c ea es mo e
engaging and di ec communica ion han
excessi e eliance on passi e cons uc ions
(Ame ican Psychological Associa ion, 2020).
Addi ionally, he judicious use o echnical
e minology ensu es accessibili y o b oade
audiences wi hou comp omising scien i ic
p ecision (Williams & Bizup, 2017).
E ec i e pa ag aph s uc u e and
ansi ional elemen s guide eade s h ough
complex a gumen s, main aining a logical
low h oughou manusc ip s (C ews, 2013).
The p inciple o "old- o-new" in o ma ion
p og ession helps eade s build unde s anding
inc emen ally, while clea opic sen ences
p o ide oadmaps o each pa ag aph's
con en (Cla k, 2016). Fu he mo e, a en ion
o sen ence a ie y and hy hm p e en s
mono ony and sus ains eade engagemen
h oughou leng hy echnical discussions
(Lanham, 2007).
E hical Conside a ions in Scien i ic W i ing
Scien i ic w i ing ca ies inhe en
e hical obliga ions ha ex end beyond
accu acy o encompass issues o au ho ship,
ci a ion p ac ices, and esea ch in eg i y
(S eneck, 2006). P ope a ibu ion o ideas
and indings h ough comp ehensi e ci a ion
p ac ices acknowledges in ellec ual
con ibu ions by enabling eade s o ace he
de elopmen o scien i ic concep s
(Commi ee on Publica ion E hics, 2019). The
phenomenon o plagia ism, whe he
in en ional o inad e en , unde mines he
ounda ion o schola ly communica ion and
iola es undamen al p inciples o academic
in eg i y (Roig, 2015).
T anspa ency in epo ing
me hodologies, limi a ions, and po en ial
con lic s o in e es se es as a basis o e hical
scien i ic communica ion (Ioannidis, 2005).
The selec i e epo ing o esul s o he
omission o ele an limi a ions can mislead
eade s and comp omise he in eg i y o he
scien i ic eco d (Simmons e al., 2011).
Mo eo e , acknowledging unding sou ces,
collabo a o s, and ins i u ional suppo
app op ia ely ensu es comp ehensi e
ecogni ion o esea ch con ibu ions
(In e na ional Commi ee o Medical Jou nal
Edi o s, 2019).
Quali y Assu ance and Pee Re iew
The pee e iew p ocess se es as a
c i ical quali y con ol mechanism ha
enhances he igo and eliabili y o scien i ic
publica ions (Smi h, 2006). Adequa e
p epa a ion o pee e iew equi es au ho s o
an icipa e po en ial c i icisms and add ess
me hodological conce ns p oac i ely
(Bo nmann, 2011). The inco po a ion o
eedback om colleagues and men o s du ing
manusc ip p epa a ion can iden i y
weaknesses and imp o e cla i y be o e o mal
submission (Goldbo , 2006).
Sel -edi ing and e ision p ocesses
ep esen essen ial componen s o quali y
assu ance ha ex end beyond basic
p oo eading o encompass s uc u al
o ganiza ion and a gumen de elopmen
(Re ising P ose, 2007). The use o checklis s
and sys ema ic e iew p ocedu es helps
ensu e compliance wi h jou nal equi emen s
and disciplina y con en ions (Gas el & Day,
2016). Addi ionally, he engagemen o
p o essional edi ing se ices, when
app op ia e, can enhance cla i y and
adhe ence o language con en ions wi hou
Dahal, N. (2025). GS Spa k, 3(1)
GS Spa k: Jou nal o Applied Academic Discou se (ISSN: 3021-9329)
4
comp omising scien i ic con en (Flowe dew,
2001).
Concluding Rema ks
E ec i e scien i ic w i ing ep esen s
a mul i ace ed skill ha encompasses
s uc u al o ganiza ion, s ylis ic cla i y,
e hical in eg i y, and quali y assu ance
p ac ices. The ecommenda ions p esen ed in
his edi o ial emphasize he impo ance o
sys ema ic app oaches o manusc ip
de elopmen ha p io i ize eade
comp ehension while main aining scien i ic
igo . As he scien i ic communi y con inues
o e ol e owa d g ea e anspa ency and
in e disciplina y collabo a ion, he abili y o
communica e esea ch indings clea ly and
e hically becomes inc easingly c i ical o
indi idual esea che s and he ad ancemen
o scien i ic knowledge.
The ans o ma i e po en ial o well-
cons uc ed scien i ic na a i es ex ends
beyond adi ional disciplina y bounda ies o
os e inno a ion and knowledge ans e
ac oss di e en ields. Thus, by adhe ing o
es ablished con en ions while emb acing
cla i y and accessibili y, esea che s can
con ibu e o a mo e inclusi e and e ec i e
scien i ic discou se ha se es bo h
specialized communi ies and b oade socie al
needs. In es ing in he de elopmen o s ong
scien i ic w i ing skills ul ima ely bene i s
bo h indi idual ca ee ad ancemen and he
collec i e p og ess o scien i ic unde s anding
and applica ion.
Volume 3, Issue 1 Co e s
Volume 3, Issue 1 includes an edi o ial
and se en a icles. The edi o ial highligh s ha
e ec i e scien i ic w i ing, as he ounda ion
o academic communica ion, demands
s uc u al igo , e hical in eg i y, and cla i y o
os e in e disciplina y collabo a ion, uphold
publica ion s anda ds, and meaning ully
ad ance global esea ch discou se. In he i s
a icle, Ghimi e and KC analyze he his o ical
e olu ion o socialis ideology h ough
Ma xism, Leninism, and Madan Bhanda i's
People's Mul ipa y Democ acy (Jabaj),
ea u ing hei heo e ical ounda ions,
p ac ical adap a ions, and Nepal's democ a ic
model as a ans o ma i e al e na i e o iolen
e olu ion. In he second a icle, Timilsina and
Bhu el examine he pe cep ions o Nepali
seconda y English eache s ega ding lipped
class oom pedagogy, highligh ing i s po en ial
o enhance s uden au onomy and engagemen
despi e challenges such as limi ed echnology,
igid cu icula, and insu icien aining. In he
hi d a icle, Bhanda i ocuses on how
emi ances signi ican ly suppo Nepal's
economy; howe e , hei o e eliance isks
long- e m s agna ion by unde mining
indus ial g ow h, labo pa icipa ion, and
sus ainable de elopmen . In he ou h a icle,
Phunyal examines he e ol ing pedagogical
p ac ices o Nepali English eache s and hei
suppo o s uden -cen e ed and ICT-
in eg a ed me hods while e ealing sys emic
ba ie s ha hinde e ec i e class oom
implemen a ion and educa ional e o m. In he
i h e iew a icle, G.C. e al. e eal how
social class in luences ma hema ics
achie emen h ough cul u al capi al,
educa ional a i udes, and s uc u al ba ie s,
u ging policy e o ms o p omo e equi y and
cul u ally esponsi e eaching. In he six h
a icle, Adhika i explo es ha despi e Nepal's
ede al manda e o inclusi e local planning,
weak ins i u ional capaci y, limi ed
engagemen , and powe imbalances hinde
meaning ul pa icipa ion, especially among
ma ginalized communi ies. In he inal a icle,
Oli and Kandel examine how emale English
eache s in Nepal cons uc hei p o essional
iden i ies amid socio-cul u al no ms,
highligh ing he need o gende -sensi i e
policies and ins i u ional suppo o os e hei
g ow h and e ec i eness.
Dahal, N. (2025). GS Spa k, 3(1)
GS Spa k: Jou nal o Applied Academic Discou se (ISSN: 3021-9329)
5
Re e ences
Ame ican Psychological Associa ion. (2020).
Publica ion manual o he Ame ican
Psychological Associa ion (7 h ed.).
Ame ican Psychological Associa ion.
And ade, C. (2011). How o w i e a good
abs ac o a scien i ic pape o
con e ence p esen a ion. Indian
Jou nal o Psychia y, 53(2), 172–175.
h ps://doi.o g/10.4103/0019-
5545.82558
A ino, A. R., D iessen, E., & Maggio, L. A.
(2019). E hical shades o g ay:
In e na ional equency o scien i ic
misconduc and ques ionable esea ch
p ac ices in heal h p o essions
educa ion. Academic Medicine, 94(1),
76–84.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1097/ACM.0000000
000002412
Ba deka , S. B. (2016). Fo mula ing he igh
i le o a esea ch a icle. Jou nal o
Associa ion o Physicians o India,
64(2), 53–56.
Boo h, A., Su on, A., & Papaioannou, D.
(2016). Sys ema ic app oaches o a
success ul li e a u e e iew. SAGE
Publica ions.
Bo nmann, L. (2011). Scien i ic pee e iew.
Annual Re iew o In o ma ion Science
and Technology, 45(1), 197–245.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/a is.2011.1440
450112
B ownell, S. E., P ice, J. V., & S einman, L.
(2013). Science communica ion o he
gene al public: Why we need o each
unde g adua e and g adua e s uden s
his skill as pa o hei o mal
scien i ic aining. Jou nal o
Unde g adua e Neu oscience
Educa ion, 12(1), E6–E10.
Casade all, A., & Fang, F. C. (2018).
Rep oducible science. In ec ion and
Immuni y, 78(12), 4972–4975.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1128/IAI.00908-10
Cla k, R. P. (2016). W i ing ools: 55 essen ial
s a egies o e e y w i e . Li le,
B own and Company.
Commi ee on Publica ion E hics. (2019).
Guidelines on good publica ion
p ac ice. COPE.
C ews, F. (2013). The andom house handbook
(6 h ed.). Random House.
Dahal, N. (2025). Quali a i e da a analysis:
Re lec ions, p ocedu es, and some
poin s o conside a ion. F on ie s in
Resea ch Me ics and Analy ics, 10,
1669578.
h ps://doi.o g/10.3389/ ma.2025.166
9578
Day, R. A., & Gas el, B. (2016). How o w i e
and publish a scien i ic pape (8 h ed.).
G eenwood P ess.
h ps://doi.o g/10.5040/979840066692
6
Doche y, M., & Smi h, R. (1999). The case o
s uc u ing he discussion o scien i ic
pape s. BMJ, 318(7193), 1224–1225.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1136/bmj.318.7193.
1224
Flowe dew, J. (2001). A i udes o jou nal
edi o s o nonna i e speake
con ibu ions. TESOL Qua e ly, 35(1),
121–150.
h ps://doi.o g/10.2307/3587862
Gas el, B., & Day, R. A. (2016). How o w i e
and publish a scien i ic pape (8 h ed.).
G eenwood P ess.
h ps://doi.o g/10.5040/979840066692
6
Goldbo , R. (2006). W i ing o science. Yale
Uni e si y P ess.
Gopen, G. D., & Swan, J. A. (1990). The
science o scien i ic w i ing. Ame ican
Scien is , 78(6), 550–558.
Ha ley, J. (2008). Academic w i ing and
publishing: A p ac ical handbook.
Rou ledge.
h ps://doi.o g/10.4324/978020392798
4
Dahal, N. (2025). GS Spa k, 3(1)
GS Spa k: Jou nal o Applied Academic Discou se (ISSN: 3021-9329)
6
Hea d, S. B. (2016). The scien is 's guide o
w i ing: How o w i e mo e easily and
e ec i ely h oughou you scien i ic
ca ee . P ince on Uni e si y P ess.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1515/978140088114
7
In e na ional Commi ee o Medical Jou nal
Edi o s. (2019). Recommenda ions o
he conduc , epo ing, edi ing, and
publica ion o schola ly wo k in
medical jou nals. ICMJE.
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why mos published
esea ch indings a e alse. PLoS
Medicine, 2(8), e124.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1371/jou nal.pmed.0
020124
Kalle , R. H. (2004). How o w i e he me hods
sec ion o a esea ch pape . Respi a o y
Ca e, 49(10), 1229–1232.
Lanham, R. A. (2007). Re ising p ose (5 h ed.).
Longman.
Nosek, B. A., Al e , G., Banks, G. C.,
Bo sboom, D., Bowman, S. D.,
B eckle , S. J., ... & Ya koni, T. (2015).
P omo ing an open esea ch cul u e.
Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1126/science.aab237
4
Pea s, R., & Shields, G. (2019). Ci e hem
igh : The essen ial e e encing guide
(11 h ed.). Red Globe P ess.
Pinke , S. (2014). The sense o s yle: The
hinking pe son's guide o w i ing in he
21s cen u y. Viking.
Roig, M. (2015). A oiding plagia ism, sel -
plagia ism, and o he ques ionable
w i ing p ac ices: A guide o e hical
w i ing. O ice o Resea ch In eg i y.
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn,
U. (2011). False-posi i e psychology:
Undisclosed lexibili y in da a
collec ion and analysis allows
p esen ing any hing as signi ican .
Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–
1366.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/095679761141
7632
Smi h, R. (2006). Pee e iew: A lawed
p ocess a he hea o science and
jou nals. Jou nal o he Royal Socie y o
Medicine, 99(4), 178–182.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/014107680609
900414
Sollaci, L. B., & Pe ei a, M. G. (2004). The
in oduc ion, me hods, esul s, and
discussion (IMRAD) s uc u e: A i y-
yea su ey. Jou nal o he Medical
Lib a y Associa ion, 92(3), 364–367.
S eneck, N. H. (2006). Fos e ing in eg i y in
esea ch: De ini ions, cu en
knowledge, and u u e di ec ions.
Science and Enginee ing E hics, 12(1),
53–74.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/PL00022268
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic
w i ing o g adua e s uden s: Essen ial
asks and skills (3 d ed.). Uni e si y o
Michigan P ess.
h ps://doi.o g/10.3998/mpub.2173936
Swo d, H. (2012). S ylish academic w i ing.
Ha a d Uni e si y P ess.
h ps://doi.o g/10.4159/ha a d.978067
4065093
Tu e, E. R. (2001). The isual display o
quan i a i e in o ma ion (2nd ed.).
G aphics P ess.
Williams, J. M., & Bizup, J. (2017). S yle:
Lessons in cla i y and g ace (12 h ed.).
Pea son.
